1
|
Wen H, Ma H, Cai Q, Lin S, Lei X, He B, Wu S, Wang Z, Gao Y, Liu W, Liu W, Tao Q, Long Z, Yan M, Li D, Kelley KW, Yang Y, Huang H, Liu Q. Recurrent ECSIT mutation encoding V140A triggers hyperinflammation and promotes hemophagocytic syndrome in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma. Nat Med 2018; 24:154-164. [PMID: 29291352 DOI: 10.1038/nm.4456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS) is a fatal hyperinflammatory disease with a poorly understood mechanism that occurs most frequently in extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL). Through exome sequencing of ENKTL tumor-normal samples, we have identified a hotspot mutation (c.419T>C) in the evolutionarily conserved signaling intermediate in Toll pathway (ECSIT) gene, encoding a V140A variant of ECSIT. ECSIT-V140A activated NF-κB more potently than the wild-type protein owing to its increased affinity for the S100A8 and S100A9 heterodimer, which promotes NADPH oxidase activity. ECSIT-T419C knock-in mice showed higher peritoneal NADPH oxidase activity than mice with wild-type ECSIT in response to LPS. ECSIT-T419C-transfected ENKTL cell lines produced tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon (IFN)-γ, which induced macrophage activation and massive cytokine secretion in cell culture and mouse xenografts. In individuals with ENKTL, ECSIT-V140A was associated with activation of NF-κB, higher HPS incidence, and poor prognosis. The immunosuppressive drug thalidomide prevented NF-κB from binding to the promoters of its target genes (including TNF and IFNG), and combination treatment with thalidomide and dexamethasone extended survival of mice engrafted with ECSIT-T419C-transfected ENKTL cells. We added thalidomide to the conventional dexamethasone-containing therapy regimen for two patients with HPS who expressed ECSIT-V140A, and we observed reversal of their HPS and disease-free survival for longer than 3 years. These findings provide mechanistic insights and a potential therapeutic strategy for ENKTL-associated HPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haijun Wen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Institute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huajuan Ma
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qichun Cai
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.,Lymphoma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
| | - Suxia Lin
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinxing Lei
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin He
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sijin Wu
- Center for Molecular Medicine, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Zifeng Wang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Lymphoma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wensheng Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weiping Liu
- Department of Pathology, West-China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qian Tao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Zijie Long
- Department of Hematology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Yan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dali Li
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
| | - Keith W Kelley
- Laboratory of Immunophysiology, Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Science (ACES) and Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - Yongliang Yang
- Center for Molecular Medicine, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Huiqiang Huang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Lymphoma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
| | - Quentin Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Institute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,Department of Hematology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is more effective than dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of prior thalidomide exposure. Blood 2008; 112:4445-51. [DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-141614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractThis analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with thalidomide. Of 704 patients, 39% were thalidomide exposed. Thalidomide-exposed patients had more prior lines of therapy and longer duration of myeloma than thalidomide-naive patients. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone led to higher overall response rate (ORR), longer time to progression (TTP), and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo + dexamethasone despite prior thalidomide exposure. Among lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients, ORR was higher in thalidomide-naive versus thalidomide-exposed patients (P = .04), with longer median TTP (P = .04) and PFS (P = .02). Likewise for dexamethasone alone-treated patients (P = .03 for ORR, P = .03 for TTP, P = .06 for PFS). Prior thalidomide did not affect survival in lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients (36.1 vs 33.3 months, P > .05). Thalidomide-naive and thalidomide-exposed patients had similar toxicities. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone resulted in higher rates of venous thromboembolism, myelosuppression, and infections versus placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Lenalido-mide + dexamethasone was superior to placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Although prior thalidomide may have contributed to inferior TTP and PFS compared with thalidomide-naive patients, these parameters remained superior compared with placebo + dexamethasone; similar benefits compared with placebo + dexamethasone were not evident for thalidomide-exposed patients in terms of overall survival. Studies were registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT00056160 and NCT00424047.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug, structurally related to thalidomide, with pleiotropic activity including antiangiogenic and antineoplastic properties. It is the product of advances in our understanding of the biology of myeloma cells, their interactions with the microenvironment and of the underlying molecular pathways. In preclinical and clinical studies, lenalidomide was more potent and less toxic than thalidomide. Subsequent phase II and III studies confirmed the activity of lenalidomide either as a single agent or in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory myeloma patients, whereas combinations with chemotherapy induce high response rates and durable remissions. Lenalidomide has been used successfully as an upfront treatment either with high or low dose dexamethasone or with melphalan and prednisone, resulting in high overall response and complete response rates and excellent 1-year survival. Lenalidomide causes less neuropathy than thalidomide; however, the risk of thromboembolism is high, especially in patients treated with lenalidomide and steroids. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of action, toxicity and clinical activity, and the current role of lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma or other related plasma cell disorders.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The use of thalidomide is limited by adverse effects of sedation, constipation, neuropathy and thromboembolism. In order to discover more potent and less toxic immunomodulators than thalidomide, its chemical structure was modified and lenalidomide was formed. Lenalidomide is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality. Two studies and a case report have evaluated lenalidomide in these MDS patients and showed significantly higher cytogenetic responses and durable red blood cell transfusion independence. Lenalidomide should be the drug of choice for patients with low and intermediate-1 risk MDS (based on the International Prognostic Scoring System) with chromosome 5q31 deletion with or without other karyotype abnormalities. Lenalidomide, in combination with dexamethasone, has been compared with dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in two studies (MM-009 in North America and MM-010 in Europe, Israel and Australia). In these two phase III trials, lenalidomide demonstrated impressive (58-59%) response rates with dexamethasone. Lenalidomide has also been shown to overcome thalidomide resistance in MM patients. Therefore, the lenalidomide plus dexamethasone regimen provides another treatment option, in addition to first line MM treatment regimens of bortezomib, thalidomide or high-dose dexamethasone, for the treatment of relapsed or refractory MM. Lenalidomide does not produce significant sedation, constipation or neuropathy, but does lead to significant myelosuppression, unlike thalidomide. The prescribing information has a black box warning for risk of myelosuppression, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism and teratogenicity. Administration of lenalidomide is recommended at a starting dose of 10 mg/day orally for deletion 5q in MDS patients. Significant risk of myelosuppression may lead to dose reduction in the majority of these patients. Clinical trials of relapsed and refractory MM have shown that lenalidomide is clinically efficacious at a dosage of 25 mg/day when administered in combination with dexamethasone. Lenalidomide should be continued until disease progression in both MDS and MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin R Shah
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center-School of Pharmacy/VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Although multiple myeloma remains incurable with conventional treatments, management of the disease has recently been transformed with the introduction of three novel agents, bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is approved for the treatment of patients who have received one prior therapy; there is a growing body of clinical evidence showing its effectiveness alone and in combination in the frontline setting, with high response rates and consistently high rates of complete response. Thalidomide plus dexamethasone is approved as frontline treatment of multiple myeloma. Other combination regimens including thalidomide have demonstrated substantial activity in both relapsed and frontline settings. Recently, the thalidomide analogue lenalidomide has been approved, in combination with dexamethasone, for the treatment of patients who have received one prior therapy; this regimen has shown promising results in the frontline setting. These agents represent a new generation of treatments for multiple myeloma that affect both specific intracellular signaling pathways and the tumor microenvironment. Other novel, targeted therapies are also being evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies. Regimens incorporating bortezomib, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and other novel agents, together with commonly used conventional drugs, represent a promising future direction in myeloma treatment. At present, further investigation is required to assess the safety and activity of combinations integrating these other novel agents. However, bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide are now in widespread clinical use. This review therefore focuses on the extensive clinical data available from studies of these drugs in the treatment of newly diagnosed and advanced multiple myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul G Richardson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 44 Binney Street, Dana 1B02, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|