Patient-Derived Organoids for In Vivo Validation of In Vitro Data

Patient-derived organoids are promising tumor models for functional validation of next-generation sequencing-based therapy recommendations. In times of rapidly advancing precision oncology approaches in everyday clinical processes, reliable and valid tumor models are required. Tumor organoids consist of tumor "stem" cells, differentiated (epithelial) tumor, and stroma cells. The cellular architecture and interactions closely mimic the original patient tumor. These organoids can be implanted into immunodeficient mice, generating patient-derived organoid-derived xenografts, thus enabling in vitro to in vivo transfer. Most importantly, the high clinical relevance of PDO models is maintained in this conversion. This protocol describes in detail the methods and techniques as well as the materials necessary to generate in vitro PDO and in vivo PDO-derived xenograft models. The elaborate process description starts with the processing of freshly obtained tumor tissue. The proceedings include tissue processing, organoid culturing, PDO implantation into immunodeficient mice, tumor explantation, and finally tumor preservation. All these proceedings are described in this timely chronological order. This protocol will enable researchers to generate PDO models from freshly received tumor tissue and generate PDO-derived xenografts. Models generated according to these methods are suitable for a very broad research spectrum.

Incidence and associated factors of cetuximab-induced hypersensitivity infusion reactions in 1392 cancer patients treated in four French areas: a possible association with Lyme disease?

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have observed an increased incidence of Cetuximab-induced hypersensitivity infusion reactions (CI-IRs) in the southeastern states of the USA. Tick's bites were suspected of generating cross-reactions between cetuximab and alpha-gal. This study aims was to describe the incidence and associated risk factors of CI-IRs, in the French areas chosen according to their Lyme disease incidence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients that received cetuximab infusion from January 2010 to June 2019 in 4 French areas with different Lyme disease incidence rates.

RESULTS

Of 1392 patients, 117 (8.4%) experienced a CI-IR, including 68 severe (grade 3 or 4) reactions (4.9%). This CI-IR incidence was significantly higher in the Lyme disease high-risk area than in the other areas (13.2% versus 7.1%, 8.1% and 6.4%; P = 0.016). Sex (P = 0.53), premedication (P = 0.91), primary cancer location (P = 0.46) and chemotherapy regimen type (P = 0.78) had no impact on CI-IR incidence in the overall population. In the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patient subgroup, CI-IRs were significantly more frequent in the high-risk area (16.4% versus 6.7%, 7.1% and 7.0%; P = 0.0015).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that patients treated in the French area with the highest incidence of Lyme disease are at a higher risk of CI-IRs.

DPYD and TYMS polymorphisms as predictors of 5 fluorouracil toxicity in colorectal cancer patients

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an essential component of systemic chemotherapy for CRC. Our objective was to determine the genotypic frequency of polymorphisms affecting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) and thymidylate synthetase (TYMS) genes and to correlate the genetic profile with the toxicity due to 5-FU, also considering nongenetic factors. This is a prospective study that involved 66 patients. We extracted DNA by salting out methods. We carried out the genotyping of the different polymorphisms by simple PCR for the TYMS 5'UTR and by PCR-RFLP for DPYD: 1905 + 1 G > A, 85 T > C, 496 A > G, 1679 T > G, c.483 + 18G > A and the TYMS: 5'UTR VNTR, 5'UTR G > C and 3'UTR. The study of the association of DPYD and TYMS polymorphisms with the various signs of toxicity under 5-FU revealed that the polymorphisms 496 A > G were significantly associated with hepatotoxicity: OR = 3.85 (p = 0.04). In addition, 85 T > C was significantly associated with mucositis and neurotoxicity: OR = 4.35 (p = 0.03), OR = 3.79 (p = 0.02). For TYMS, the only significant association we observed for 5'UTR with vomiting: OR = 3.34 (p = 0.04). The incidence of adverse reactions related to 5-FU appears to be influenced in patients with CRC by the identified DPYD and TYMS gene polymorphisms in the Tunisian population.

Patient-Derived Organoid Model in the Prediction of Chemotherapeutic Drug Response in Colorectal Cancer

As an emerging technology in precision medicine, the patient-derived organoid (PDO) technology has been indicated to provide novel modalities to judge the sensitivity of individual tumors to cancer drugs. In this work, an in vitro model of colorectal cancer (CRC) was established using the PDO culture, and it is demonstrated that the PDO samples preserved, to a great extent, the histologic features and marker expression of the original tumor tissues. Subsequently, cancer drugs 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan were selected and screened on five CRC PDO samples, while the patient-derived organoid xenograft (PDOX) model was applied for comparison. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn according to the IC₅₀ data from the PDO model and the relative tumor proliferation rate (T/C%) from PDOX. Interestingly, the area under the ROC curve was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.64-1.04, P value = 0.028), which suggested that the IC₅₀ of cancer drugs from the PDO model was strongly correlated with PDOX responses. In addition, the optimal sensitivity cutoff value for drug screening in CRC PDOs was identified at 10.35 μM, which could act as a reference value for efficacy evaluation of 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in the colorectal cancer drug screening. Since there are no unified criteria to judge the sensitivity of drugs in vitro, our work provides a method for establishing in vitro evaluation criteria via PDO and PDOX model using the patient tissues received from local hospitals, exhibiting potential in clinical cancer therapy and precision medicine.

The Role of Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibody in mCRC Maintenance Therapy

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) combined with chemotherapy in patients with RAS (rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) can alleviate and stabilize the disease, effectively prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and improve the overall response rate (ORR), which is the first-line treatment standard scheme for RAS wild-type mCRC currently. However, whether anti-EGFR mAb can be used for the maintenance treatment after the first-line treatment of mCRC remains controversial. We reviewed the recent studies on anti-EGFR mAb. The contents include five parts, introduction, anti-EGFR mAb in mCRC and its status in first-line therapy, establishment of the maintenance treatment pattern after the standard first-line treatment for mCRC, research progress of anti-EGFR mAb in mCRC maintenance therapy, and conclusion. More studies support the maintenance treatment of anti-EGFR mAb, but some researchers raise the problems about high cost and drug resistance. Despite lack of the maintenance evidence of anti-EGFR mAb, especially lack of large-scale phase III prospective clinical trials, with the emergence of new evidence and more accurate screening of treatment-dominant groups, maintenance therapy with anti-EGFR mAb monotherapy or anti-EGFR mAb combined with fluorouracil-based schemes after first-line chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR mAb therapy might strive for more treatment opportunities, optimize treatment strategies and prolong treatment continuity, and finally, lead to more survival benefit for suitable patients.

Effect of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine on circulating and imaging biomarkers in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective biomarker study

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy supplemented by molecularly targeted therapies. There is a critical need to define biomarkers that can optimise the use of these therapies to maximise efficacy and avoid unnecessary toxicity. However, it is important to first define the changes in potential biomarkers following cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. This study reports the impact of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy across a range of circulating and imaging biomarkers.

METHODS

A single-centre, prospective, biomarker-driven study. Eligible patients included those diagnosed with colorectal cancer with liver metastases that were planned to receive first line oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. Patients underwent paired blood sampling and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biomarkers were associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Twenty patients were recruited to the study. Data showed that chemotherapy significantly reduced the number of circulating tumour cells as well as the circulating concentrations of Ang1, Ang2, VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGF-D from pre-treatment to cycle 2 day 2. The changes in circulating concentrations were not associated with PFS or OS. On average, the MRI perfusion/permeability parameter, Ktrans, increased in response to cytotoxic chemotherapy from pre-treatment to cycle 2 day 2 and this increase was associated with worse OS (HR 1.099, 95%CI 1.01-1.20, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer with liver metastases, treatment with standard chemotherapy changes cell- and protein-based biomarkers, although these changes are not associated with survival outcomes. In contrast, the imaging biomarker, Ktrans, offers promise to direct molecularly targeted therapies such as anti-angiogenic agents.

Clinical efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC).

Method

We retrospectively enrolled patients with ACRC treated with nimotuzumab plus chemotherapy (n = 40) or chemotherapy alone (n = 44). Responses were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0.

Results

The objective overall response rate and disease control rate were higher in the combined-treatment group (55.0% vs 36.4% and 85.0% vs 75.0%, respectively), but the differences were not significant. There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival or median survival time between the combined-treatment and chemotherapy-alone groups (9.89 vs 7.86 months and 22.32 vs 18.10 months, respectively). There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups.

Conclusion

Nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy had similar efficacy and safety to chemotherapy alone in patients with ACRC. The efficacy and safety of the combined treatment should be further studied in a randomized multicenter trial with a larger number of patients with ACRC.

Immunotherapy regimens for metastatic colorectal carcinomas

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality with a 5-year overall survival rate of 13%. Despite recent advances in cancer immunotherapy, only the minority of CRC patients (<15%) with microsatellite instability can potentially benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors, the only immunotherapy currently approved for mCRC. In that context, there is an unmet need to improve survival in mCRC. Our ever-increasing understanding of the immune system and its interactions with cancer has allowed development of multiple strategies to potentially improve outcomes in the majority of mCRC patients. Various approaches to manipulate patient immunity to recognize and kill colorectal cancer cells are being explored simultaneously, with combination therapies likely being the most effective. Ideally, therapies would target tumor-restricted antigens selectively found in tumors, but shielded from immune attack in normal tissues, to mount an effective cytotoxic T-cell response, while also overcoming cellular and molecular inhibitory pathways, self-tolerance, and T-cell exhaustion. Here, we provide a brief overview of the most promising immunotherapy candidates in mCRC and their strategies to produce a lasting immune response and clinical benefit in patients with mCRC.

Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review

Background

In Europe, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with panitumumab requires prior confirmation of RAS wild-type mutation status. Two studies – a physician survey and a medical records review (MRR) – were conducted to evaluate the use of panitumumab and awareness among prescribing oncologists of the associated RAS testing requirements in clinical practice.

Methods

Both studies enrolled participants from nine European countries and were carried out in three consecutive rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 (2012–2013) examined KRAS (exon 2) testing only; the results have been published in full previously. Round 3 (2014–2015) examined full RAS testing (exons 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS) and was initiated following a change in prescribing guidelines, from requiring KRAS alone to requiring full RAS testing. For the physician survey, telephone interviews were conducted with oncologists who had prescribed panitumumab to patients with mCRC in the previous 6 months. For the MRR, oncologists were asked to provide anonymised clinical information, extracted from their patients’ records.

Results

In Round 3, 152 oncologists and 131 patients’ records were included in the physician survey and MRR, respectively. In Round 3 of the physician survey, 95.4% (n = 145) of participants correctly identified that panitumumab should only be prescribed in RAS wild-type mCRC compared with 99.0% (n = 298) of 301 participants in Rounds 1 and 2, responding to the same question about KRAS testing. In Round 3 of the MRR, 100% (n = 131) of patients included in the study had confirmed KRAS or RAS wild-type status prior to initiation of panitumumab compared with 97.7% (n = 299) of 306 patients in Rounds 1 and 2 (KRAS only). Of those patients in Round 3, 83.2% (n = 109) had been tested for RAS status and 16.8% (n = 22) had been tested for KRAS status only.

Conclusions

Physicians’ adherence to prescribing guidelines has remained high over time in Europe, despite the change in indication for panitumumab treatment, from KRAS to RAS wild-type mCRC. Additionally, this study demonstrates the uptake of full RAS testing among the majority of oncologists and pathologists.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Targeted Therapies in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review of the Evidence

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. As the population of the western world ages, the incidence of colorectal tumours among elderly patients is increasing and consequently so is the demand for treatments for elderly patients. Unfortunately, elderly patients (≥65 years) often go untreated and they are also under-represented in clinical trials. Yet there is some evidence suggesting that 'fit' elderly patients have similar outcomes and tolerance to chemotherapy treatment to their younger counterparts (although the definition of fitness in the elderly population is still a matter of debate). The evidence supporting the administration of new targeted therapies in patients older than 65 years is scarce and more research is needed. In this paper, we review all the available data concerning the use of targeted therapies for mCRC in patients older than 65 years of age and discuss the differences between this age subgroup and younger patients.

Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Addition to Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) occurs in >90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) and is associated with a poorer prognosis. A systematic review of electronic databases identified studies exploring the addition of EGFR-targeted treatment to chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced (LA)/metastatic PDAC. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of EGFR-targeted therapy were explored using meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-regression was utilised to explore factors associated with improved prognosis (all studies) and benefit from EGFR-targeted therapy (RCTs). Twenty-eight studies (7 RCTs and 21 cohort studies) comprising 3718 patients were included. The addition of EGFR-targeted treatment to chemotherapy did not improve progression-free (pooled hazard ratio (HR): 0.90, p = 0.15) or overall survival (HR: 0.94, p = 0.18). EGFR-targeted therapy was associated with increased treatment-related deaths (pooled odds ratio (OR): 5.18, p = 0.007), and grade (G)3/4 rash (OR: 4.82, p = 0.03). There was a borderline significant increase in G3/4 diarrhoea (OR: 1.75, p = 0.06), but no effect on treatment discontinuation without progression (OR: 0.87, p = 0.25). Neither G3/4 rash nor diarrhoea were associated with increased survival benefit from EGFR-targeted therapy. The effect of EGFR-targeted therapy on overall survival (OS) appeared greater in studies with a greater proportion of LA rather than metastatic patients (R = -0.69, p < 0.001). Further studies in unselected patients with advanced PDAC are not warranted. The benefit from EGFR inhibitors may be limited to patient subgroups not yet clearly defined.

Current targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a review

Treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have undergone dramatic changes in the past decade and despite improved patient outcomes, there still exist areas for continued development. The introduction of targeted agents has provided clinicians with additional treatment options in mCRC, however, results have been mixed at best. These novel therapies were designed to interfere with specific molecules involved in the cellular carcinogenesis pathway and ultimately deliver a more focused treatment. Currently, their use in mCRC has been limited primarily as an adjunct to conventional chemotherapy regimens. This review explores the relevant cell-signaling networks in colorectal cancer, provides focus on the current targeted agent armamentarium approved for use in mCRC and explores the usefulness of predictive mCRC biomarkers.

Novel cancer therapies: treatments driven by tumour biology

The traditional view is that treatments within oncology largely consist of chemotherapy, which aims to maximise damage to the rapidly dividing cancer cells but often at the expense of normal cells and overall quality of life for the patient. The development of anticancer drugs has changed from the serendipitous discoveries of the past, to today's purposeful targeting of cancer cells which takes advantage of novel technological developments and a greater understanding of tumour biology. The aim of these new treatments is to affect the essential function of the cancer cell while sparing normal cells, and limiting side effects. The phenotypic characteristics of tumours, such as unregulated growth signalling, development of new vascular systems and the evasion of immune destruction are used to identify potential drug targets. Here we review the clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms for novel therapies that are currently in use and those that are in development.

Inclusion of targeted therapies in the standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer patients in a German cancer center: the more the better?!

PURPOSE

Significant prolongation of overall survival (OS) has been reached in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment within the last 5-10 years. Our study was conducted in order to evaluate and compare OS of different standard of care treatment options in a university-based outpatient clinic.

METHODS

One hundred and three mCRC patients were identified by retrospective analysis and treated according to available guidelines. OS was analyzed according to the different combinations of first- and second-line treatments.

RESULTS

mCRC patients revealed an mOS of 34.4 months. Patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) blockade in at least one treatment line showed a significantly longer survival time (p = 0.0056) versus patients without any bevacizumab. No OS differences were detected comparing the different first- and second-line chemotherapy (CTX) strategies in the unselected population. However, wild-type (wt) Kras patients treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy plus CTX in first-line therapy showed significantly longer OS compared to those receiving only additional VEGF inhibition or no targeted therapy (p = 0.0056; mOS 46.8 vs. 20.4 months, respectively). wt Kras patients profited in trend (p = 0.076) from CTX combinations of first-line anti-EGFR followed by second-line anti-VEGF compared to first-line anti-VEGF followed by second-line anti-EGFR (mOS 46.8 vs. 19.2 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate successful allocation of the current mCRC treatment according to the Kras status. Differences in OS of wt Kras patients indicated the further need for randomized trials to define the potential benefit of sequential therapy with EGFR inhibition in first-line therapy followed by VEGFR inhibition vice versa.

Molecular profiling of 6,892 colorectal cancer samples suggests different possible treatment options specific to metastatic sites

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) carries a poor prognosis with an overall 5-year survival of 13.1%. Therapies guided by tumor profiling have suggested benefit in advanced cancer. We used a multiplatform molecular profiling (MP) approach to identify key molecular changes that may provide therapeutic options not typically considered in mCRC. We evaluated 6892 mCRC referred to Caris Life Sciences by MP including sequencing (Sanger/NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in-situ hybridization (ISH). mCRC metastases to liver, brain, ovary or lung (n = 1507) showed differential expression of markers including high protein expression of TOPO1 (52%) and/or low RRM1 (57%), TS (71%) and MGMT (39%), suggesting possible benefit from irinotecan, gemcitabine, 5FU/capecitabine and temozolomide, respectively. Lung metastases harbored a higher Her2 protein expression than the primary colon tumors (4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.028). Brain and lung metastases had higher KRAS mutations than other sites (65% vs 59% vs 47%, respectively, p = 0.07, <0.01), suggesting poor response to anti-EGFR therapies. BRAF-mutated CRC (n = 455) showed coincident high protein expression of RRM1 (56%), TS (53%) and low PDGFR (22%) as compared with BRAF wild-type tumors. KRAS-mutated mCRC had higher protein expression of c-MET (47% vs. 36%) and lower MGMT (56% vs. 63%), suggesting consideration of c-MET inhibitors and temozolomide. KRAS-mutated CRC had high TUBB3 (42% vs. 33%) and low Her2 by IHC (0.5%) and HER2 by FISH (3%, p <0.05). CRC primaries had a lower incidence of PIK3CA and BRAF mutations in rectal cancer versus colon cancer (10% and 3.3%, respectively). MP of 6892 CRCs identified significant differences between primary and metastatic sites and among BRAF/KRAS sub-types. Our findings are hypothesis generating and need to be examined in prospective studies. Specific therapies may be considered for different actionable targets in mCRC as revealed by MP.

A phase I open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab for relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Pazopanib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor shown to be clinically active in the treatment of various cancer types. This study aimed to evaluate the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR), safety, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in adult patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a Phase I, 3 + 3 design, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT0050943; VEG108925) conducted in sequential cohorts to determine the MTR of pazopanib and irinotecan administered with cetuximab. Twenty-five patients received treatment in three dosing cohorts and were evaluated for safety and tolerability of the combination and pharmacokinetics of individual drugs.

RESULTS

The MTR was determined to be 400 mg pazopanib per day orally in combination with 150 mg/m(2) irinotecan biweekly and 250 mg/m(2) cetuximab weekly by infusion. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity. Pharmacokinetic results suggested that the overall systemic exposure to SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, was affected by pazopanib to a greater extent than was the systemic exposure to irinotecan itself.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided evidence for the manageable safety profile and feasibility of using the novel triplet combination of pazopanib, irinotecan, and cetuximab in patients with refractory mCRC. Further large-scale Phase II studies are warranted.

Predictive biomarkers of response to anti-EGF receptor monoclonal antibody therapies

SUMMARY 

The EGF receptor (EGFR) pathway plays an important role in the progression of several carcinomas, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The EGFR has emerged as a candidate for targeted therapy for CRC. Two monoclonal antibodies used to inhibit the EGFR signaling pathway are cetuximab and panitumumab. Both these monoclonal antibodies inhibit tumor-promoting activities, such as tumor cell proliferation, survival, angiogenesis and metastasis. However, only a subpopulation of metastatic CRC patients responds to such therapy. Constitutive activation within the pathway gives rise to other aberrantly expressed biomarkers that are able to circumvent the anti-EGFR treatment and confer resistance. Mechanisms of resistance and the value of these emerging predictive biomarkers in the clinical setting are discussed in this review.

[A perspective: role of targeted therapy in colon cancer]

Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignant disease in incidence according to a report in 2009 from Korea. The 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) remains to be a major chemotherapeutic agents. But, over the last 10-15 years, the treatment pattern for metastatic colorectal cancer changed significantly. Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are cytotoxic drugs, or bevacizumab and cetuximab are monoclonal antibodies against molecular targets. The introduction of novel agents targeting specific molecular features of cancer cells promises more options and marked improvements in efficacy for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer. Bevacizumab has been shown to extend survival in colorectal cancer when used in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU-based chemotherapy, and the addition of cetuximab to irinotecan and 5-FU-based chemotherapy eliminates irinotecan resistance. Better understanding of the tumor biology and the molecular pathway and mechanisms of tumorigenesis has led to the discovery of novel agents with improved outcomes.

Understanding the economic value of molecular diagnostic tests: case studies and lessons learned

Ten years after completion of the Human Genome Project, progress towards making “personalized medicine” a reality has been slower than expected. The reason is twofold. Firstly, the science is more difficult than expected. Secondly, limited progress has been made in aligning economic incentives to invest in diagnostics. This paper develops nine case studies of “success” where diagnostic tests are bringing personalized medicine into clinical practice with health and economic impact for patients, healthcare systems, and manufacturers. We focus on the availability of evidence for clinical utility, which is important not only for clinicians but also for payers and budget holders. We find that demonstrating diagnostic clinical utility and the development of economic evidence is currently feasible (i) through drug-diagnostic co-development, and (ii) when the research is sponsored by payers and public bodies. It is less clear whether the diagnostic industry can routinely undertake the work necessary to provide evidence as to the clinical utility and economic value of its products. It would be good public policy to increase the economic incentives to produce evidence of clinical utility: otherwise, opportunities to generate value from personalized medicine—in terms of both cost savings and health gains—may be lost.

Oncologists' attitudes toward KRAS testing: a multisite study

Recent discoveries promise increasingly to help oncologists individually tailor anticancer therapy to their patients’ molecular tumor characteristics. One such promising molecular diagnostic is Kirsten ras (KRAS) tumor mutation testing for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. In the current study, we examined how and why physicians adopt KRAS testing and how they subsequently utilize the information when discussing treatment strategies with patients. We conducted 34 semi-structured in-person or telephone interviews with oncologists from seven different health plans. Each interview was audiotaped, transcribed, and coded using qualitative research methods. Information and salient themes relating to the research questions were summarized for each interview. All of the oncologists in this study reported using the KRAS test at the time of the interview. Most appeared to have adopted the test rapidly, within 6 months of the publication of National Clinical Guidelines. Oncologists chose to administer the test at various time points, although the majority ordered the test at the time their patient was diagnosed with mCRC. While oncologists expressed a range of opinions about the KRAS test, there was a general consensus that the test was useful and provided benefits to mCRC patients. The rapid adoption and enthusiasm for KRAS suggests that these types of tests may be filling an important informational need for oncologists when making treatment decisions. Future research should focus on the informational needs of patients around this test and whether patients feel informed or confident with their physicians’ use of these tests to determine treatment access.

Antiangiogenic therapy of colorectal cancer: state of the art, challenges and new approaches

Advanced colorectal cancer is the first tumor type for which an antiangiogenic agent, namely bevacizumab, has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for therapy in humans; it has been in use since February 2004. This review paper summarizes and discusses the results obtained with this agent and highlights the main open or controversial issues on antiangiogenic therapy, taking into account that the clinical results obtained are below the expectations, particularly in the adjuvant setting.

Resectability and outcome with anti-EGFR agents in patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal liver-limited metastases: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab (C) and panitumumab (P) increase response rate and survival in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess their effect on overall response rate (ORR), the rate of radical resection (R0) and survival in patients with liver-limited initially unresectable mCRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for RCTs comparing first-line chemotherapy plus or minus C or P and reporting data in patients with KRAS wild-type, unresectable liver-limited mCRC. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence interval were calculated. Meta-analysis of hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) was also performed.

RESULTS

Four RCTs involving 484 KRAS wild-type patients were included. Compared to chemotherapy alone, the addition of C or P significantly increased the ORR (RR 1.67, p = 0.0001), the R0 resection rate from 11% to 18% (RR 1.59, p = 0.04) and PFS (HR 0.68, p = 0.002), but not OS (p = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of C and P increased the R0 resection rate by 60% and reduced the risk of progression by 32% in patients with mCRC and unresectable liver-limited disease. This combination represents one of the preferred choices as conversion therapy in KRAS wild-type patients with unresectable liver metastases.

Cost-effectiveness of adding cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the cost effectiveness of adding cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) from the perspective of the Canadian public healthcare system.

METHODS

We developed a Markov state transition model to project the lifetime clinical and economic consequences of recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. Transition probabilities were derived from a phase III trial of cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. Cost estimates were obtained from London Health Sciences Centre and the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, and expressed in 2011 CAD. A three year time horizon was used. Future costs and health benefits were discounted at 5%.

RESULTS

In the base case, cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone led to an increase of 0.093 QALY and an increase in cost of $36,000 per person, resulting in an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $386,000 per QALY gained. The cost effectiveness ratio was most sensitive to the cost per mg of cetuximab and the absolute risk of progression among patients receiving cetuximab.

CONCLUSION

The addition of cetuximab to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC has an ICER that exceeds $100,000 per QALY gained. Cetuximab can only be economically attractive in this patient population if the cost of cetuximab is substantially reduced or if future research can identify predictive markers to select patients most likely to benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy.

A nomogram predicting disease-free survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with hepatic resection: multicenter data collection as a Project Study for Hepatic Surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to create a nomogram to predict the disease-free survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with hepatic resection.

METHODS

Perioperative factors were assessed in 727 hepatectomized patients with colorectal liver metastases between 2000 and 2004 at the 11 institutions of the "Project Committee of the Liver" in the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. A nomogram was developed as a graphical representation of a stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Perioperative mortality was 0.55%. Disease-free and overall survival rates were 31.2 and 63.8% at 3 years, 27.2 and 47.7% at 5 years, and 24.7 and 38.5% at 10 years, respectively. Six preoperative factors were selected to create the nomogram for disease-free survival: synchronous metastases, 3 points; primary lymph node positive, 3 points; number of tumors 2-4, 4 points and ≥5, 9 points; largest tumor diameter >5 cm, 2 points; extrahepatic metastasis at hepatectomy, 4 points, and preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level >100, 4 points. The estimated median disease-free survival time was easily calculated by the nomogram: >8.4 years for patients with 0 points, 1.9 years for 5 points, 1.0 years for 10 points, and the rates were lower than 0.6 years for patients with more than 10 points.

CONCLUSIONS

This nomogram can easily calculate the median and yearly disease-free survival rates from only 6 preoperative variables. This is a very useful tool to determine the likelihood of early recurrence and the necessity for perioperative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases after hepatic resection.

Good response to leucovorin and fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin and cetuximab therapy in a patient with metastatic ascending colon cancer harboring a KRAS p.G13D mutation

The effectiveness of cetuximab (Cmab) against KRAS p.G13D mutant-type tumors has been reported. In this study, we report a case of metastatic ascending colon cancer harboring a KRAS p.G13D mutation in a 65-year-old female. Considering the absence of symptoms and the post-operative risk of respiratory system complications due to multiple lung metastases, particularly at the entrance to the left main bronchus, anticancer drug therapy was selected as first-line therapy. With informed consent, FOLFOX4 [folinic acid (FOL), fluorouracil (F) plus oxaliplatin (OX)] + Cmab therapy was administered as preoperative chemotherapy. A good preoperative response was obtained to the chemotherapy, with a metastatic lesion disappearing from the entrance to the left main bronchus. Subsequent resection was performed successfully with no post-operative complications. Although a histopathological examination of the resected tissue specimen revealed residual cancer cells, it also showed the marked efficacy of the chemotherapy regimen used. In this study, we describe a case of metastatic ascending colon cancer harboring a KRAS p.G13D mutation in which the patient responded well to first-line therapy with FOLFOX4 + Cmab.

Surgical removal of metastases after successful treatment containing bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer has a low cure rate. When resection of metastases is feasible, however, survival is increased. We present a case of a patient with metastases that responded well to bevacizumab-containing treatment. Consequently, surgical resection of metastases was possible resulting in increased survival.

The dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor lapatinib synergistically enhances the antitumor activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat in colorectal cancer models

As key molecules that drive progression and chemoresistance in gastrointestinal cancers, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2 have become efficacious drug targets in this setting. Lapatinib is an EGFR/HER2 kinase inhibitor suppressing signaling through the RAS/RAF/MEK (MAP/ERK kinase)/MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) and PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase)/AKT pathways. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are a novel class of agents that induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis following the acetylation of histone and nonhistone proteins modulating gene expression and disrupting HSP90 function inducing the degradation of EGFR-pathway client proteins. This study sought to evaluate the therapeutic potential of combining lapatinib with the HDACi panobinostat in colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines with varying EGFR/HER2 expression and KRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations. Lapatinib and panobinostat exerted concentration-dependent antiproliferative effects in vitro (panobinostat range 7.2-30 nmol/L; lapatinib range 7.6-25.8 μmol/L). Combined lapatinib and panobinostat treatment interacted synergistically to inhibit the proliferation and colony formation in all CRC cell lines tested. Combination treatment resulted in rapid induction of apoptosis that coincided with increased DNA double-strand breaks, caspase-8 activation, and PARP cleavage. This was paralleled by decreased signaling through both the PI3K and MAPK pathways and increased downregulation of transcriptional targets including NF-κB1, IRAK1, and CCND1. Panobinostat treatment induced downregulation of EGFR, HER2, and HER3 mRNA and protein through transcriptional and posttranslational mechanisms. In the LoVo KRAS mutant CRC xenograft model, the combination showed greater antitumor activity than either agent alone, with no apparent increase in toxicity. Our results offer preclinical rationale warranting further clinical investigation combining HDACi with EGFR and HER2-targeted therapies for CRC treatment.

Are we turning to more than a first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with high dose irinotecan?: A monocentric institution safety analysis of 46 patients

PURPOSE

Irinotecan (CPT11) at 180 mg/m(2) with LV5FU2 for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) has response rates (RRs) of 56 and 4% as first- and second-line treatments, respectively [1-2], and higher doses of CPT11 result in higher RRs. The present cohort analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of increasing doses of this combination treatment in clinical practice.

METHODS

Chemo-naive and pretreated patients with MCRC received CPT11 and LV5FU2 (5FU 48-h CI 2400 mg/m(2), D1 bolus leucovorin 200 mg/m(2)), followed by 5FU 400 mg/m(2) (cycles d1-d15). CPT11 dose was increased by 20 mg/m(2) at each cycle, from 180 mg/m(2) up to 260 mg/m(2), unless grade 3 toxicities other than alopecia arose.

RESULTS

Between March 2002 and September 2005, 46 patients were recruited (median age: 62.3 years). A total of 512 cycles of chemotherapy were administered (median: 9 cycles/patient; range: 3-41). Median follow-up was 16.2 months. Altogether, 27 patients had received prior chemotherapy: 24 with an oxaliplatin-based regimen; seven with CPT11; and five with LV5FU2 or oral 5FU. Doses of 260 mg/m(2) were used in 17 patients, 240 mg/m(2) in seven, 220 mg/m(2) in six and 200 mg/m(2) in five, while 11 remained at 180 mg/m(2); 121 cycles used 260 mg/m(2) (24%), with 76 cycles at 240 mg/m(2) (14%), 78 cycles at 220 mg/m(2) and 58 cycles at 200mg/m(2). The objective response (OR) was 40%, with stable disease (SD) in 45% and disease progression (DP) in 11%. In the first-line therapy group, partial/complete responses were 55%, with SD in 30% and DP in 15%. In pretreated patients, OR was 30.5%, SD was 58.5% and DP was 11%. Nine patients (20%) had a therapeutic break (median: 5.1 months; range: 3-10). Overall median survival was 17 months, with 16.5 months in pretreated patients and 19.6 months in the first-line group. Toxicity grades 3-4 and overall incidence per cycle were: neutropenia, 3-22%; diarrhea, 4-22%; vomiting, 2-20%; alopecia, 20-26%; anemia, 0.2-2%; thrombocytopenia, 0-0%; and mucositis, 0.4-2.2%.

CONCLUSION

The toxicity of high-dose CPT11+LV5FU2 chemotherapy was well tolerated when the dose was progressively increased according to individual tolerability, with 37% of patients receiving CPT11 at 260 mg/m(2). Progression-free survival (PFS) increased with higher doses of CPT11. In the chemo-naive and pretreated subgroups, the median PFS was 10.9 and 8.8 months, respectively (P=0.698, NS). Optimization of CPT11 doses in pretreated patients appears to pave the way for new treatment options.

Envisioning the future of early anticancer drug development

The development of novel molecularly targeted cancer therapeutics remains slow and expensive with many late-stage failures. There is an urgent need to accelerate this process by improving early clinical anticancer drug evaluation through modern and rational trial designs that incorporate predictive, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, pharmacogenomic and intermediate end-point biomarkers. In this article, we discuss current approaches and propose strategies that will potentially maximize benefit to patients and expedite the regulatory approvals of new anticancer drugs.

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and FOLFOX response in colorectal cancer patients

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

* Numerous clinical studies, including a few prospective ones, have reported conflicting results on the impact of gene polymorphisms related to fluorouracil (FU) and oxaliplatin pharmacodynamics.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

* This prospective study is the first to report that clinical response to FOLFOX is significantly related to methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms (677C-->T and 1298A-->C), with a response rate of 37, 53, 63 and 80% in patients harbouring no, one, two or three favourable MTHFR alleles, respectively. * Only polymorphisms of genes related to oxaliplatin pharmacodynamics (GSTpi 105Ile-->Val and XPD 751Ly-->Gln) influenced progression-free survival. * These results corroborate the observation that response was related to the cumulative FU dose, whereas progression-free survival was related to the cumulative oxaliplatin dose.

AIMS

To test prospectively the predictive value of germinal gene polymorphisms related to fluorouracil (FU) and oxaliplatin (Oxa) pharmacodynamics on toxicity and responsiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients receiving FOLFOX therapy.

METHODS

Advanced CRC patients (n= 117) receiving FOLFOX 7 therapy were enrolled. Gene polymorphisms relevant for FU [thymidylate synthase (TYMS, 28 bp repeats including the G-->C mutation + 6 bp deletion in 3'UTR), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR, 677C-->T, 1298A-->C), dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase (IVS14+1G-->A) and Oxa: glutathione S-transferase (GST) pi (105Ile-->Val, 114Ala-->Val), excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) (118AAT-->AAC), ERCC2 (XPD, 751Lys-->Gln) and XRCC1 (399Arg-->Gln)] were determined (blood mononuclear cells).

RESULTS

None of the genotypes was predictive of toxicity. Response rate (54.7% complete response + partial response) was related to FU pharmacogenetics, with both 677C-->T (P= 0.042) and 1298A-->C (P= 0.004) MTHFR genotypes linked to clinical response. Importantly, the score of favourable MTHFR alleles (677T and 1298C) was positively linked to response, with response rates of 37.1, 53.3, 62.5 and 80.0% in patients bearing no, one, two or three favourable alleles, respectively (P= 0.040). Polymorphisms of genes related to Oxa pharmacodynamics showed an influence on progression-free survival, with a better outcome in patients bearing GSTpi 105 Val/Val genotype or XPD 751Lys-containing genotype (P= 0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that response to FOLFOX therapy in CRC patients may be driven by MTHFR germinal polymorphisms.

Cetuximab-based therapy vs noncetuximab therapy in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

A meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab-based therapy vs noncetuximab therapy in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHOD

A total of 4617 patients from seven randomized controlled trials were available for analysis, with 2305 patients in the cetuximab group and 2312 patients in the noncetuximab group. The efficacy data included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). The safety data that contained overall grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs), specific grade 3 and 4 toxicity such as acneiform rash, cetuximab-related skin toxicity, diarrhoea, fatigue, neutropenia, hypertension, nausea and hand-foot skin reaction are evaluated.

RESULT

There was a significant PFS benefit in favour of cetuximab-based therapy (HR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.63 to 0.73) and OS benefit (HR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.81 to 1.00). The ORR was significantly higher in the cetuximab-based arm (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.30 to 3.68). The incidence of overall grade 3-4 toxicity was significantly higher in the cetuximab arm compared with the noncetuximab arm (61.2%vs 43.0%, OR = 2.32, 95%CI: 1.59-3.39). This difference was mainly attributed to cetuximab-related skin toxicity (OR = 5.86, 95%CI: 1.38-24.88), especially acneiform rash (OR = 51.37, 95%CI: 22.75-116.02). In addition, cetuximab resulted in a significant increase in grade 3 and 4 diarrhoea, fatigue and neutropenia, except for hypertension, nausea and hand-foot skin reaction.

CONCLUSION

Cetuximab-based therapy improves PFS and OS resulting in better ORR vs noncetuximab therapy. Its most common and severe AE is skin toxicity that should be predictable and manageable.

Oncogenic mutations as predictive factors in colorectal cancer

The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab have been demonstrated to be new therapeutic options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Oncogenic activation of intracellular signalling pathways downstream of EGFR has a major role in colorectal carcinogenesis but has also been reported to be an important mechanism of resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies. Among the activating mutations found in colorectal cancers, tumour KRAS mutations, which are found in approximately 40% of the cases, have been widely demonstrated as a major predictive marker of resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab, therefore, opening the way to individualized treatment for patients with mCRC. Other oncogenic mutations, such as BRAF or PIK3CA mutations or loss of PTEN expression, may also be additional interesting predictive markers of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies but required further evaluation before being incorporated in clinical practice. The identification of these molecular markers involved in the resistance of anti-EGFR antibodies will allow the development of new therapies that should target 'escape mechanisms' used by tumours to circumvent a pathway that has been pharmacologically blocked by anti-EGFR.

Evolving treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Advances in colorectal cancer treatment have led to improved outcomes for patients. A number of cytotoxic agents, alone and in combination, have shown activity. The addition of the newer, so-called "targeted" agents to standard chemotherapy drugs and regimens has also modestly improved outcomes. Progress in our knowledge and understanding of molecular pathways has led to the identification of markers critical in determining response or nonresponse to some of the targeted agents. This review discusses the available therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer and describes some of the molecular markers implicated in activity and resistance to current targeted therapies.

Electrolyte and protein imbalance following anti-EGFR therapy in cancer patients: A comparative study

Electrolytic changes in blood have been associated with the use of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the rate of incidence and the severity of blood electrolyte and protein imbalances occurring in patients receiving cetuximab or panitumumab with or without concurrent chemotherapy. Treatment data of 58 patients who received cetuximab and 21 patients who received panitumumab were analyzed. Cetuximab caused hypomagnesemia in more than half of the patients, among whom 4 had severity up to grade 2/3 level, whereas panitumumab induced hypomagnesemia in 90% of the patients with severity up to grade 2 level occurring in 38% of the patients. Intravenous magnesium supplementation on the day of anti-EGFR treatment did not always adequately control the magnesium wasting in these patients. Often treatments with these agents had to be interrupted or terminated as a result of severe electrolyte depletion despite supplementation. Taking into consideration the mechanism of magnesium wasting from the kidney and the magnesium transport process in the gut, intravenous magnesium infusion coupled with oral supplementation with more tolerant oral magnesium products may help improve the treatment outcome in these patients. Surprisingly, more than half of these patients showed significant decreases in their albumin levels, which were correlated with the initiation or discontinuation of anti-EGFR therapy. The underlying mechanism of this decrease in albumin level is not known. The increased likelihood of poor outcomes such as mortality, morbidity and prolonged hospital stay in acutely ill patients with hypoalbuminemia is well recognized. Moreover, the maintenance of adequate serum albumin levels in these patients receiving anti-EGFR therapy may play an important role in containing some of the adverse effects of concurrently administered chemotherapeutic agents.

KRAS mutational status as a predictor of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor efficacy in colorectal cancer

Inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have demonstrated promising potential in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, a proportion of patients do not respond to therapy with EGFR inhibitors, and therefore, there has been interest in identifying those patients most likely to benefit from therapy with these agents. KRAS, a member of the RAS family of signaling proteins, plays an important role in EGFR-mediated regulation of cellular proliferation and survival. Although there is still some debate regarding the prognostic importance of KRAS mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, several recent phase 2 and 3 studies have identified the presence of mutations at codons 12 and 13 of KRAS as predictors of poor response to the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies panitumumab and cetuximab. Patients with wild-type KRAS were found to have significantly better progression-free survival, overall survival, and/or objective response rate compared with patients harboring KRAS mutations. As a result, there has been growing interest in the development of KRAS mutational status as a biomarker for predicting patient response to EGFR-targeted therapy. Screening colorectal tumors for the absence of KRAS mutations may help identify patients most likely to benefit from anti-EGFR therapies.

Predicting response to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer: current practice and future directions

The identification of KRAS mutational status as a predictive marker of response to antibodies against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been one of the most significant and practice-changing recent advances in colorectal cancer research. Recently, data suggesting a potential role for other markers (including BRAF mutations, loss of phosphatase and tension homologue deleted on chromosome ten expression, and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-AKT pathway mutations) in predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy have emerged. Ongoing clinical trials and correlative analyses are essential to definitively identify predictive markers and develop therapeutic strategies for patients who may not derive benefit from anti-EGFR therapy. This article reviews recent clinical trials supporting the predictive role of KRAS, recent changes to clinical guidelines and pharmaceutical labeling, investigational predictive molecular markers, and newer clinical trials targeting patients with mutated KRAS.

Biomarkers predicting clinical outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

The monoclonal antibodies panitumumab and cetuximab that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have expanded the range of treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer. Initial evaluation of these agents as monotherapy in patients with EGFR-expressing chemotherapy-refractory tumors yielded response rates of approximately 10%. The realization that detection of positive EGFR expression by immunostaining does not reliably predict clinical outcome of EGFR-targeted treatment has led to an intense search for alternative predictive biomarkers. Oncogenic activation of signaling pathways downstream of the EGFR, such as mutation of KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA oncogenes, or inactivation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene is central to the progression of colorectal cancer. Tumor KRAS mutations, which may be present in 35%-45% of patients with colorectal cancer, have emerged as an important predictive marker of resistance to panitumumab or cetuximab treatment. In addition, among colorectal tumors carrying wild-type KRAS, mutation of BRAF or PIK3CA or loss of PTEN expression may be associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody treatment, although these additional biomarkers require further validation before incorporation into clinical practice. Additional knowledge of the molecular basis for sensitivity or resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies will allow the development of new treatment algorithms to identify patients who are most likely to respond to treatment and could also provide rationale for combining therapies to overcome primary resistance. The use of KRAS mutations as a selection biomarker for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) treatment is the first major step toward individualized treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

[The development of the first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)]

Chemotherapy options of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have been progressed rapidly in the last years. Besides of the standard fluorouracil/folinic acid treatment some new active agents (oxaliplatin and irinotecan) have been introduced, and more recently the "targeted" biologicals (bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab) have demonstrated their high effectiveness. This review summarizes the development of the first line treatment of mCRC.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor involved in the proliferation and survival of cancer cells. EGFR is the first molecular target against which monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have been developed for cancer therapy. Here we review the mechanisms underlying the effects of EGFR-specific mAb in cancer therapy. The efficacy of EGFR-specific mAb in cancer occurs thanks to inhibition of EGFR-generated signalling; furthermore, the effects of antibodies on the immune system seem to play an important role in determining the overall anti-tumour response. In this review, attention is focused on cetuximab and panitumumab, two mAb introduced recently into clinical practice for treatment of metastatic colorectal and head and neck cancer which target the external part of EGFR.

Evolving treatment of advanced colon cancer

Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy worldwide. Despite significant developments in the treatment of this disease, it still causes considerable morbidity and mortality. Recent advances include both newer cytotoxic chemotherapies and novel biologic agents. Although overall progress has been more modest than had been hoped, substantial benefits have been achieved for some patients, and the number of treatment options has substantially increased. Perhaps most importantly, treatment regimens can now be selected and tailored toward the individual patient following an informed discussion between the patient and the treating oncologist. We present in detail these recent advances and provide some insight into several promising future strategies.