Survival Benefit of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis

PURPOSE

It has been reported that the survival of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is better in East Asia countries than in developed western countries; however, the prognosis of LAGC remains poor. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of perioperative chemotherapy on the long-term survival of East Asia patients with LAGC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 2006 through August 2008, 43 patients with LAGC received perioperative S-1 combined with weekly docetaxel in a phase II study (neoadjuvant group). These patients were matched using propensity scores to patients who underwent surgery without neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the same period (surgery group). The surgical outcomes and long-term survivals were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

After matching, 43 and 86 patients were included in the neoadjuvant and surgery groups, respectively, and there was no significant difference in their baseline characteristics. Although the operating time was longer in the neoadjuvant group, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the 2 groups. The neoadjuvant group had a significantly higher 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (73.3% vs. 51.1%, P=0.005) and a trend towards higher 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (62.8% vs. 49.9%, P=0.145). In the multivariate analysis, perioperative chemotherapy was an independent factor for OS, with a hazard ratio of 0.4 (P=0.005) and a marginal effect on the PFS (P=0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative chemotherapy was associated with better long-term survival without increasing postoperative complications in the setting of D2 surgery for patients with LAGC, suggesting that perioperative chemotherapy can be a therapeutic option in East Asia countries.

Gastric cancer with high risk of intraperitoneal progression: clinical course and current treatments

Locally advanced gastric cancer with a high risk of intraperitoneal progression is characterized by poor prognosis. After radical surgery, most patients die during the first two years post-operation as a result of disease progression. The prevailing type of progression and the leading cause of death in patients with gastric cancer is implantation metastasis.

The main risk factors for peritoneal carcinomatosis in such patients include: gastric tumor invasion into serosa, the presence of tumor cells in peritoneal washings, the largeness of the tumor as accompanied by extensive serous lesions, infiltrative type of tumor growth, histological variants of gastric cancer prone to implantation metastasis and metastatic lesions in regional lymph nodes. Systemic chemotherapy does not provide effective eradication of subclinical peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

The vast majority of patients who suffer from locally advanced gastric cancer and run a high risk of implantation metastasis are characterized by subclinical peritoneal dissemination at primary diagnosis, which means a rapidly fatal prognosis for such patients. In recent years, however, the paradigm of treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer has changed: a combination of surgery and adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is used increasingly, and presents an alternative to the previously accepted surgery only approach. It is also likely to increase the survival rate.

Phase II study of docetaxel and S-1 (DS) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage III resectable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel (DTX) plus S-1 for resectable advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 47 patients from 14 centers were centrally registered. Patients received DTX (35 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15, and daily oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m(2)/day) for days 1-14 every 4 weeks for two courses, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was pathological response rate (pRR). This study was registered in the UMIN clinical trial registry (UMIN000000875).

RESULTS

The primary endpoint pRR was 47 % (90 % confidence interval (CI), 34-60 %; p < 0.0001). The response rate to preoperative chemotherapy using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was 34 %. Forty-six patients (98 %) underwent surgery, and curative resection was performed in 44 patients. Thirty-seven patients completed the protocol treatment. The most common toxicities of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were grade 3/4 neutropenia (42 %), febrile neutropenia (4 %), grade 2 anorexia (21 %), and fatigue (15 %). Treatment-related death and operative mortality was not observed in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and S-1 was well tolerated. This is promising as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen for patients with potentially resectable advanced gastric cancer.

S-1 for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

INTRODUCTION

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens are used worldwide as the standard treatment in chemotherapy for gastric cancer. S-1 , a fourth-generation oral fluoropyrimidine that combines tegafur and two biochemical modulators: gimeracil and oteracil potassium, is now attracting considerable interest.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses the clinical evidence of S-1 in gastrointestinal malignancies, such as gastric, colorectal, pancreatic and biliary tract cancers. S-1 has demonstrated advantages over standard therapies, in both advanced and postoperative settings, in large Phase III studies. S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin is recommended in the 2010 Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Results from Phase III studies have demonstrated that S-1 in combination with chemotherapies, such as cisplatin in gastric cancer, and irinotecan and oxaliplatin in colorectal cancers, is non-inferior to conventional 5-FU-based standard regimens, with the benefit of convenience and reduced toxicity.

EXPERT OPINION

The excellent design of S-1 aimed to reduce toxicity by avoiding certain routes of degradation, and to enhance activity by reducing catabolism. This has provided not only a suitable alternative to 5-FU, but also higher efficacy.

Pilot feasibility study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S-1 in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer featuring adjacent tissue invasion or JGCA bulky N2 lymph node metastases

BACKGROUND

To improve the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer, clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are being performed. Although neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) generally achieves superior local tumor control to NAC, its efficacy for locally advanced gastric cancers remains unclear. Therefore, a prospective trial was conducted to explore the feasibility and safety of NACRT with oral S-1 in a series of cases.

METHODS

Patients who had Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) cStage IIIB gastric cancer were enrolled onto this study and received oral S-1 (65 mg/m(2)/day) administration and 50-Gy radiotherapy followed by radical surgery. The primary end points were completion of therapy and safety.

RESULTS

Between October 2005 and September 2008, 12 eligible patients were enrolled. Two could not complete the chemotherapy because of grade 3 toxicity. R0 resections were performed in 11 patients (91.7 %) (95 % confidence interval 61.5-99.8). Although operative morbidity was observed in two cases, there were no postoperative deaths. A pathologic response was observed in 10 patients (83.3 %). In five (62.5 %) of eight gastric cancers with invasion to adjacent structures, microscopic tumor deposits were not found in the affected organs. The 3-year survival rate was 58.3 % during a median follow-up period of 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study is preliminary, the present regimen seems to be feasible and safe as a treatment for locally advanced gastric cancers featuring adjacent tissue invasion or JGCA bulky N2 disease. This treatment approach should now be tested using the new tumor, node, metastasis staging system in a large clinical trial.

Induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin followed by surgery for treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination is poor. Recently, chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin has been shown to be highly effective for advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

In 41 patients diagnosed with either macro- or microscopic peritoneal dissemination by staging laparoscopy, and receiving induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin between August 2002 and February 2008, response of peritoneal lesions to the induction chemotherapy and the outcome of the following surgery were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 41 patients identified, 38 patients (93%) completed two cycles. Among grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, neutropenia was most frequently observed (9 patients; 22%). After chemotherapy, 32 patients (78%) underwent surgery and R0 resection was accomplished in 22 patients. Although objective response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was recorded in only four patients (10%), peritoneal dissemination disappeared in 19 patients (46%). Patients with limited peritoneal metastasis, negative peritoneal cytology, or response of the primary lesion were more likely to exhibit disappearance of the peritoneal dissemination. Median survival time of all patients was 20.4 months. Patients with R0 resection had median survival time of 43.2 months, which was significantly longer than for those with noncurative resection (12.6 months) or without surgery (10.3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited peritoneal dissemination of gastric origin is highly sensitive to induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin. Resection after disappearance of peritoneal metastasis could cure some patients.