Sarcomatoid Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma with Brain Metastasis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma typically signifies an exceptionally poor prognosis, with patients rarely surviving beyond one year. An 83-year-old male presented to our hospital with complaints of headache and left-sided limb weakness. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the head and lungs disclosed a mass within the right temporal lobe, accompanied by peritumoral edema in the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) delineated a mass in the right temporal lobe, measuring 3 × 3 × 3 cm. He underwent cytoreductive surgery successively in the neurosurgery and urology departments. Despite experiencing postoperative tumour recurrence, the patient has lived close to four years to date. This case report illustrates that cytoreductive surgery combined with systemic pharmacotherapy can still confer significant survival benefits for elderly patients.

Sarcomatoid and Rhabdoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical, Pathologic, and Molecular Genetic Features

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sarcomatoid and rhabdoid morphologies has an aggressive biological behavior and a typically poor prognosis. The current 2022 WHO classification of renal tumors does not include them as distinct histologic entities but rather as transformational changes that may arise in a background of various distinct histologic types of RCC. The sarcomatoid component shows malignant spindle cells that may grow as intersecting fascicles, which is reminiscent of pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma. The rhabdoid cells are epithelioid cells with eccentrically located vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli and large intracytoplasmic eosinophilic inclusions. Studies have shown that RCCs with sarcomatoid and rhabdoid differentiation have distinctive molecular features. Sarcomatoid RCC harbors shared genomic alterations in carcinomatous and rhabdoid components, but also enrichment of specific genomic alterations in the sarcomatoid element, suggesting molecular pathways for development of sarcomatoid growth from a common clonal ancestor. Rhabdoid differentiation also arises through clonal evolution although less is known of specific genomic alterations in rhabdoid cells. Historically, treatment has lacked efficacy, although recently immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibitors has produced significant clinical responses. Reporting of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid features in renal cell carcinoma is required by the College of American Pathologists and the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting. This manuscript reviews the clinical, pathologic, and molecular features of sarcomatoid RCC and rhabdoid RCC with emphasis on the morphologic features of these tumors, significance of diagnostic recognition, the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis and differentiation along sarcomatoid and rhabdoid lines, and advances in treatment, particularly immunotherapy.

Epigenomic signatures of sarcomatoid differentiation to guide the treatment of renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation (sRCC) is associated with poor survival and a heightened response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Two major barriers to improving outcomes for sRCC are the limited understanding of its gene regulatory programs and the low diagnostic yield of tumor biopsies due to spatial heterogeneity. Herein, we characterized the epigenomic landscape of sRCC by profiling 107 epigenomic libraries from tissue and plasma samples from 50 patients with RCC and healthy volunteers. By profiling histone modifications and DNA methylation, we identified highly recurrent epigenomic reprogramming enriched in sRCC. Furthermore, CRISPRa experiments implicated the transcription factor FOSL1 in activating sRCC-associated gene regulatory programs, and FOSL1 expression was associated with the response to ICIs in RCC in two randomized clinical trials. Finally, we established a blood-based diagnostic approach using detectable sRCC epigenomic signatures in patient plasma, providing a framework for discovering epigenomic correlates of tumor histology via liquid biopsy.

Localised non-metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: a 31-year externally verified study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate post-nephrectomy outcomes and predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients with localised sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) and those with Grade 4 RCC (non-sRCC), as most sRCC research focuses on advanced or metastatic disease with limited studies analysing outcomes of patients with localised non-metastatic sRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 564 patients with localised RCC underwent partial or radical nephrectomy between June 1988 to March 2019 for sRCC (n = 204) or World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology Grade 4 non-sRCC (n = 360). The CSS at every stage between groups was assessed. Phase III ASSURE clinical trial data were used to externally validate the CSS findings. The Mann-Whitney U-test and chi-squared test compared outcomes and the Kaplan-Meier method evaluated CSS, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival. Clinicopathological features associated with RCC death were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 31.5 months. The median OS and CSS between the sRCC and Grade 4 non-sRCC groups was 45 vs 102 months and 49 vs 152 months, respectively (P < 0.001). At every stage, sRCC had worse CSS compared to Grade 4 non-sRCC. Notably, pT1 sRCC had worse CSS than pT3 Grade 4 non-sRCC. Negative predictors of CSS were sarcomatoid features, non-clear cell histology, positive margins, higher stage (pT3/pT4), and use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). ASSURE external verification showed worse CSS in patients with sRCC (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.36; P = 0.01), but not worse outcomes in MIS surgery (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.75-2.56; P = 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Localised sRCC had worse CSS compared to Grade 4 non-sRCC at every stage. Negative survival predictors included positive margins, higher pathological stage, use of MIS, and non-clear cell histology. sRCC is an aggressive variant even at low stages requiring vigilant surveillance and possible inclusion in adjuvant therapy trials.

Results From a Randomized Phase II Trial of Sunitinib and Gemcitabine or Sunitinib in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Features: ECOG-ACRIN E1808

INTRODUCTION

Sarcomatoid renal cancer (sRCC) patients have poor outcomes. EA1808 evaluated sunitinib and gemcitabine (SG) and sunitinib alone (S) in sRCC in a randomized cooperative group phase II trial (NCT01164228).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pts were aggregated 1:1 to SG (45 pts) or S (40 pts) using a 2-stage design. sRCC pts with ≤ 1 prior nonvascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor were stratified into prognostic groups: good (clear cell, < 20% sarcomatoid, PS 0), intermediate (20%-50% sarcomatoid, PS 0), and poor (nonclear cell or > 50% sarcomatoid or PS 1). The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). For SG, the null RR was 15% and a 30% RR was of interest. For S, a 20% RR was of interest vs. a 5% null rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

Both arms met protocol criteria for stage 2 of accrual. A total of 47 pts were randomized to SG and 40 to S. The SG arm had 9 of 45 evaluable patient responses (RR of 20%; CI = [13%-31%]) not meeting the predetermined threshold for success. The sunitinib arm met its endpoint with 6/37 (RR of 16%; CI = [9%-27%]) evaluable responses. Grade ≥ 3 events were experienced by 36 in the SG arm and 17 in the sunitinib arm CONCLUSIONS: EA1808 was the largest and first randomized cytotoxic trial for sarcomatoid RCC. Sunitinib alone but not the SG met the preset threshold of success. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is only useful in limited clinical scenarios for sRCC.

The Natural History of Renal-Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Differentiation, a Stage-by-Stage Analysis

BACKGROUND

Sarcomatoid differentiation in patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) imply aggressive behavior and often metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. We aim to examine the overall survival (OS) in patients with sRCC using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients diagnosed with sRCC between 2010-2015. We employed Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to examine the impact of several potential risk factors on OS in patients diagnosed with sRCC.

RESULTS

In total, 8582 patients with renal cancer were found to have sarcomatoid differentiation, with 4105 patients (47.8%) being diagnosed with AJCC stage IV disease. The median OS was 17.2 months (IQR 5.4, 68.7 months). Compared to patients who did not undergo surgery, OS was significantly longer in patients undergoing partial or total nephrectomy across all stages. This result remained consistent on multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics (Surgery: Hazard ratio 0.54, 95%Confidence interval 0.43 - 0.68, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort sRCC was found to have an unfavorable median OS, which was mainly caused by the high number of cases diagnosed with late-stage disease. Additionally, surgery was associated with favorable OS across all stages. This study supports the notion that surgical therapy, even in the setting of cytoreductive surgery, provides a survival benefit in patients with sRCC.

Expression of PD-L1 in renal cancer, prognostic features and clinical utility of its routine staining

INTRODUCTION

The expression of PD-L1 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with worse survival and prognostic clinical-pathological features. However, they seem to respond better to new therapeutic agents. Knowing the behavior of RCC according to the presence of PD-L1 has implications for medical counseling and therapeutic approaches.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the presence of PD-L1 in renal tumor cells and analyze its association with patients' prognostic factors, overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective analysis of RCC tissue samples, obtained between 2018 and 2021. Immunohistochemistry analysis with mouse monoclonal Anti PD-L1, clone 22C3. Definition of PD-L1 "positive" as a Tumor Proportion Score ≥1%. Comparison of prognostic factors according to the presence or absence of PD-L1, and univariate analysis for OS and CSS.

RESULTS

14% (n = 11) of the sample were PD-L1(+). Average age was 59 years. There were no statistically significant differences between PD-L1 status and TNM stages, nuclear grade and histology. PD-L1(+) had worse OS with a HR of 5.27 (CI: 1.1-23.7; P = .03) and CSS showed a unfavorable tendency for PD-L1(+) with a HR of 4.79 (CI: 0.79-28.95; P = .08).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of PD-L1 in RCC is considerable. In this study PD-L1(+) was associated with unfavorable OS and CSS. It seems reasonable to incorporate its routine use in RCC.

Therapeutic Management of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Revolution in Every Decade

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) oncogenesis is mainly driven by VHL gene inactivation, leading to overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The use of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed against VEGF and its receptor (VEGFR) revolutionised the management of metastatic renal cancer in the 2000s. The more recent development of next-generation TKIs such as cabozantinib or lenvatinib has made it possible to bypass some of the mechanisms of resistance to first-generation anti-VEGFR TKIs. During the decade 2010-2020, the development of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies revolutionised the management of many solid cancers, including RCC, in first- and subsequent-line settings. Dual ICB or ICB plus anti-VEGFR TKI combinations are now the standard of care for patients with advanced clear cell RCC. To optimise these combination therapies while preserving patient quality of life, escalation and de-escalation strategies are being evaluated in prospective randomised trials, based on patient selection according to their prognosis risk. Finally, new therapeutic approaches, such as targeting hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) and the development of innovative treatments using antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), CAR-T cells, or radiopharmaceuticals, are all potential candidates to improve further patient survival.

Molecular mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Loss of von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene is frequently observed in ccRCC and increases the expression of hypoxia-inducible factors and their targets, including epidermal growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) offer a survival benefit in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced in mRCC. Combination therapy with TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly improved patient outcomes. Therefore, TKIs still play an essential role in mRCC treatment. However, the clinical utility of TKIs is compromised when primary and acquired resistance are encountered. The mechanism of resistance to TKI is not fully elucidated. Here, we comprehensively reviewed the molecular mechanisms of resistance to TKIs and a potential strategy to overcome this resistance. We outlined the involvement of angiogenesis, non-angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, activating bypass pathways, lysosomal sequestration, non-coding RNAs, epigenetic modifications and tumor microenvironment factors in the resistance to TKIs. Deep insight into the molecular mechanisms of resistance to TKIs will help to better understand the biology of RCC and can ultimately help in the development of more effective therapies.

The significance of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid dedifferentiation in renal cell carcinoma

Dedifferentiation in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), either sarcomatoid or rhabdoid, is an infrequent event that may occur heterogeneously in the setting of any RCC histology and is associated with poor outcomes. Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is associated with inferior survival with angiogenesis targeted therapy and infrequent responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, immune checkpoint therapy has significantly improved outcomes for patients with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation. Biologically, sarcomatoid dedifferentiation has increased programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and an inflamed tumor microenvironment, in addition to other distinct molecular alterations. Less is known about rhabdoid dedifferentiation from either a clinical, biological, or therapeutic perspective. In this focused review, we will discuss the prognostic implications, outcomes with systemic therapy, and underlying biology in RCC with either sarcomatoid or rhabdoid dedifferentiation present.

Sarcomatoid-associated gene risk index for clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma is a de-differentiated form of kidney cancer with an extremely poor prognosis. Genes associated with sarcomatoid differentiation may be closely related to the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma. The prognosis of renal cell carcinoma itself is extremely variable, and a new prognostic model is needed to stratify patients and guide treatment. Data on clear cell renal cell carcinoma with or without sarcomatoid differentiation were obtained from TCGA database, and a sarcomatoid-associated gene risk index (SAGRI) and column line graphs were constructed using sarcomatoid-associated genes. The predictive power of the SAGRI and column line graphs was validated using an internal validation set and an independent validation set (E-MTAB-1980). The SAGRI was constructed using four sarcoma-like differentiation-related genes, COL7A1, LCTL, NPR3, ZFHX4, and had a 1-year AUC value of 0.725 in the training set, 0.712 in the internal validation set, and 0.770 in the independent validation set for TCGA training cohort, with high model reliability. The molecular characteristics among the SAGRI subgroups were analyzed by multiple methods, and results suggested that the SAGRI-HIGH subgroup may benefit more from immunotherapy to improve prognosis. SAGRI satisfactorily predicted the prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma with or without sarcomatoid differentiation.

Genomic alteration of MTAP/CDKN2A predicts sarcomatoid differentiation and poor prognosis and modulates response to immune checkpoint blockade in renal cell carcinoma

Sarcomatoid differentiation is a highly aggressive pathological characteristic of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and is characterized by susceptibility to progression and extremely poor prognosis. In this study, we included all genomic alteration events that led to a loss of protein function of MTAP and CDKN2A, and enrolled 5,307 RCC patients with genomic sequencing data from Western and Chinese cohorts. Notably, MTAP/CDKN2AMUT occurred in the Chinese population ~2 times more frequently than in the Western cohort and showed significant co-mutation trends. We found significantly higher proportions of sarcomatoid-positive patients with MTAPMUT or CDKN2AMUT compared with MTAP/CDKN2A wild-type (WT) patients (P < 0.001). Of the 574 RCC samples from the FUSCC cohort and 3,563 RCC samples from 17 independent cohorts, the MTAP/CDKN2AMUT significantly predicted extremely poor outcomes (P < 0.0001). The Western cohort suggested a concordant relationship between MTAP/CDKN2AMUT and sarcomatoid differentiation in RCC. Moreover, although MTAP/CDKN2AMUT RCC may be insensitive to targeted therapy, the high degree of tumor heterogeneity and higher PD-L1 and CXCL13 expression characterizations reflected that MTAP/CDKN2A-deficient features could benefit from immunotherapy for patients with RCC. This study utilized RCC samples from large-scale, global, multicenter sequencing cohorts and first proved that MTAP/CDKN2A deficiency significantly correlates with sarcomatoid differentiation in RCC and predicts aggressive progression, poor prognosis, and primary resistance to targeted therapy and potential favorable responses to immune checkpoint blockade. Unlike conventional targeted therapies, emerging drugs such as immunotherapies or synthetic lethal PRMT5 inhibitors may become novel therapeutic options for patients with MTAP/CDKN2AMUT RCC.

A Profile of Avelumab Plus Axitinib in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Until recently, the approved first-line treatment for metastatic RCC (mRCC) consisted of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) monotherapy. The landscape of first-line treatment has been transformed in the last few years with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or VEGFR TKI plus ICI combinations. This article focuses on the profile of one of these ICI plus VEGFR TKI combination, avelumab plus axitinib. We detail the characteristics of each drug separately, and then we explore the rationale for their association, its efficacy and the resulting toxicity. Finally, we examine the factors associated with avelumab plus axitinib outcomes, and their impact on therapeutic strategy.

The Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and Targeted Therapy on Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is a rare but aggressive form of kidney cancer with a poor prognosis. Despite recent advances in therapies for kidney cancers, an effective management strategy for sRCC is uncertain. We evaluated the impact of targeted therapy and cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) on survival outcomes of patients with metastatic sRCC. We identified patients diagnosed with sRCC between January 1, 1973, and December 31, 2014, within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients with metastatic sRCC were stratified based on the era of diagnosis (before or after the introduction of targeted systemic therapy in 2006) and the status of CN. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Data of 993 patients with metastatic sRCC were available for analysis. The median age was 62 years. Most patients were male (69%), Caucasian (71%), and were diagnosed in the targeted therapy era (83%); 53% of patients underwent CN. CSS and OS of the whole cohort were 5.0 months and 4.0 months, respectively. While the introduction of targeted therapy did not improve outcomes, CN improved CSS and OS in both pre-targeted therapy and targeted therapy era. On multivariable analysis, CN was a predictor of an improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR 0.51, p < 0.0001). Among other factors, older age at diagnosis, higher T stages, and node positivity were associated with worse outcomes. Our results showed that the introduction of targeted therapy did not improve outcomes in patients with metastatic sRCC. CN improved survival in both pre-targeted and targeted therapy eras.

A Systematic Review of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Clear-Cell Renal Cancer

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as active therapies in the management of advanced RCC. While multiple studies have shown clinical activity of ICIs in clear cell histologies, the evidence to support their use in non-clear cell (ncc) subtypes is based on smaller prospective trials and retrospective analyses. Objective: The objective of this review is to summarize the clinical outcomes of ICI-based therapies in ncc-subtypes and in tumors with sarcomatoid/rhabdoid features. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar and ASCO databases. The key-words “renal cell cancer” and “immune check point inhibitors” and equivalents were used and all original publications between July 2016 and July 2021 were included. Results: We included a total of 14 publications including two clinical trials and 12 case series. The most frequent histologies were papillary (up to 75-100%), unclassified (up to 34%) and chromophobe (up to 28%). ICI monotherapy showed some activity in both 1st and 2nd line with response rates up to 27% . ICI combination regimens yielded better activity than ICI monotherapy but, overall, a heterogeneous efficacy was noted across histologies. Overall, outcomes of ICIs were superior in tumors with sarcomatoid/rhabdoid features. Conclusion: The observed activity of ICI-based therapies was heterogeneous. Combination regimens, papillary subtype and sarcomatoid/rhabdoid features were associated with higher responses. These findings might help treatment decisions and require further validation.

Immunotherapy-based combinations in the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To perform indirect comparisons of efficacy and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies for renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features (sRCC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Five trials were included in our network meta-analyses comprising 568 patients. The combinations nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab plus cabozantinib achieved significant improvement of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rates (ORR). Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with the highest likelihood of achieving a complete response. All the included combinations significantly improved PFS and ORR. The combinations of pembrolizumab plus axitinib did not show a statistically significant association with OS. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib had the highest likelihood of improving PFS and OS.

SUMMARY

Our network meta-analysis demonstrates that sRCC are responsive to immune-based combinations. The dual ICI with nivolumab plus ipilimumab improved all efficacy outcomes and achieved the highest complete response rates (CRR). Although the association of nivolumab plus cabozantinib with CRR was not statistically significant, this combination demonstrated the highest likelihood of PFS and OS improvements.

Treatment and Outcome of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Sarcomatoid Differentiation: A Single-Center, Real-World Analysis of Retrospective Data

Background: Sarcomatoid differentiation/histology of renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is still underresearched in current therapy regimes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of sRCC on outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Methods: We collected complete data of 262 consecutive mRCC patients from our institutional database for this retrospective study. All patients were treated with TKIs within a single or multimodal treatment approach. All analyses were adjusted for the presence of sRCC. Descriptive statistics as well as uni- and multivariable outcome metrics, including progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as endpoints were performed.

Results: Overall, 18 patients had sRCC (6.9%). Patients with sRCC had more often clear-cell histology (p = 0.047), a higher T-stage (p = 0.048), and underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy more frequently (p < 0.001). The most common first-line TKIs were Sunitinib (65.6%), Sorafenib (19.5%), and Pazopanib (10.3%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 32 months, patients with sRCC had significantly reduced PFS (p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.01) compared to patients without sRCC. In multivariable analyses that adjusted for the effects of standard mRCC predictors, the sarcomatoid feature retained its independent association with inferior PFS (HR: 2.39; p = 0.007) and OS (HR: 2.37; p = 0.001). This association remained statistically significant in subgroup analyses of patients with Sunitinib as first-line therapy (PFS p < 0.001; OS: p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Despite its rare occurrence, our findings confirm sRCC as a powerful predictor for inferior outcomes in mRCC treated with targeted therapies. This suggests a need for more tailored treatment strategies in patients harboring mRCC with sarcomatoid histology to improve oncological outcomes.

Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Present and Future of Treatment Paradigms

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is an aggressive form of kidney cancer that is associated with poor prognosis. It can arise from any histologic type of renal cell carcinoma. The majority of cases will present with advanced or metastatic disease requiring systemic therapy. Nephrectomy is the treatment of choice in locally resectable disease. The therapeutic options for sRCC have evolved in the past decade. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and monotherapy with targeted therapy (VEGF and mTOR) have historically shown poor response rates and survival in the treatment of metastatic sRCC. The use of checkpoint inhibitors and their combination with targeted therapy against VEGF has changed the landscape and outcomes for renal cell carcinoma. Given the rarity of sRCC most of the data on treatment is from small cohorts or extrapolation from larger clinical trials. The benefit from the combination of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy to VEGF has shown promise in the sRCC population in post hoc analysis of large clinical trials. Future research focusing on further characterizing the unique biologic and clinical features of sRCC is critical in advancing the knowledge and developing effective therapy to improve clinical outcomes and survival.

MicroRNA Profiling of Morphologically Heterogeneous Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Intratumoral heterogeneity (IH) has been recently described as an important contributor to tumor growth through a branched rather than a linear pattern of tumor evolution for renal cell carcinoma. As to whether the miRNA profiling of the different and heterogeneous areas is the same or not, it is not known. This study analyzed the differences and similarities of the miRNA profiles in histologically distinct regions within several RCC tumors. The observed differences may have great implications for the development of predictive biomarkers and the identification of druggable targets with improvement of combinatorial therapeutic approaches for the effective treatment of kidney cancer, as well as for the identification of circulating malignant cells that can be useful to detect tumor recurrences.

Prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 status in Japanese patients with renal cell carcinoma

Background

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Because the prognostic impact and effect of confounding factors are less known, we investigated the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in Japanese patients with recurrent/metastatic RCC who started systemic therapy in 2010–2015.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective study recruited patients from 29 Japanese study sites who had prior systemic therapy for RCC (November 2018 to April 2019) and stored formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary lesion samples. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) by PD-L1 expression. Secondary outcomes included OS in subgroups and duration of first- and second-line therapies by PD-L1 expression. OS distributions were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methodology.

Results

PD-L1 expression (on immune cells [IC] ≥ 1%) was observed in 315/770 (40.9%) patients. PD-L1 positivity was more prevalent in patients with poor risk per both Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [MSKCC] and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium, and high-risk pathological features (higher clinical stage, nuclear grade and sarcomatoid features). Median OS for PD-L1–positive patients was 30.9 months (95% CI 25.5–35.7) versus 37.5 months (95% CI 34.0–42.6) for PD-L1–negative patients (HR 1.04 [90% CI 0.89–1.22, p = 0.65]; stratified by MSKCC risk and liver metastases). Propensity score weight (PSW)-adjusted OS was similar between PD-L1–positive and –negative patients (median 34.4 versus 31.5 months; estimated PSW-adjusted HR 0.986).

Conclusions

This study suggests PD-L1 status was not an independent prognostic factor in recurrent/metastatic RCC during the study period because PD-L1 positivity was associated with poor prognostic factors, especially MSKCC risk status.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-021-01993-x.

Omics in urology: An overview on concepts, current status and future perspectives

Recent technological advances in molecular biology have led to great progress in the knowledge of structure and function of cells and their main constituents. In this setting, 'omics' is standing out in order to significantly improve the understanding of etiopathogenetic mechanisms of disease and contribute to the development of new biochemical diagnostics and therapeutic tools. 'Omics' indicates the scientific branches investigating every aspect of cell's biology, including structures, functions and dynamics pathways. The main 'omics' are genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and radiomics. Their diffusion, success and proliferation, addressed to many research fields, has led to many important acquisitions, even in Urology. Aim of this narrative review is to define the state of art of 'omics' application in Urology, describing the most recent and relevant findings, in both oncological and non-oncological diseases, focusing the attention on urinary tract infectious, interstitial cystitis, urolithiasis, prostate cancer, bladder cancer and renal cell carcinoma. In Urology the majority of 'omics' applications regard the pathogenesis and diagnosis of the investigated diseases. In future, its role should be implemented in order to develop specific predictors and tailored treatments.

Efficacy and correlative analyses of avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), those with sarcomatoid histology (sRCC) have the poorest prognosis. This analysis assessed the efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in patients with treatment-naive advanced sRCC.

METHODS

The randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006) enrolled patients with treatment-naive advanced RCC. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib following standard doses and schedules. Assessments in this post hoc analysis of patients with sRCC included efficacy (including progression-free survival) and biomarker analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients had sarcomatoid histology and were included in this post hoc analysis; 47 patients in the avelumab plus axitinib arm and 61 in the sunitinib arm. Patients in the avelumab plus axitinib arm had improved progression-free survival [stratified hazard ratio, 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.325-1.003)] and a higher objective response rate (46.8% versus 21.3%; complete response in 4.3% versus 0%) versus those in the sunitinib arm. Correlative gene expression analyses of patients with sRCC showed enrichment of gene pathway scores for cancer-associated fibroblasts and regulatory T cells, CD274 and CD8A expression, and tumors with The Cancer Genome Atlas m3 classification.

CONCLUSIONS

In this subgroup analysis of JAVELIN Renal 101, patients with sRCC in the avelumab plus axitinib arm had improved efficacy outcomes versus those in the sunitinib arm. Correlative analyses provide insight into this subtype of RCC and suggest that avelumab plus axitinib may increase the chance of overcoming the aggressive features of sRCC.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C Antibodies Efficiently Inhibit the Growth of Experimental Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas

Despite improvement during the last ten years in the longevity of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) the disease remains incurable. Hence, new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. Relapse following anti-angiogenic treatment depends on the over-expression of vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC), one of the main drivers of lymphangiogenesis. Therefore, we developed specific mouse monoclonal antibodies and evaluated their therapeutic efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Immunization of mice with the domain of VEGFC that stimulates the VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR3) led to the selection of one hybridoma producing specific anti-VEGFC monoclonal antibodies. The selected 1E9 antibodies were sequenced, and the corresponding variable light and heavy chains were subcloned into expression vectors in frame with sequences encoding the human IgG1 constant heavy and light chains. CHO cells were stably transfected and cloned to produce chimeric antibodies. These antibodies inhibited the activation of VEGFR3 signaling, and therefore the proliferation and migration of VEGFC-stimulated endothelial cells. Moreover, they inhibited the proliferation of VEGFC-expressing renal cancer cells through NRP2 signaling. 1E9 antibodies inhibited the growth of experimental RCC, and their therapeutic efficacy was enhanced by the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab. Hence, our results suggest that targeting VEGFC could have a relevant therapeutic impact on mccRCC that relapse following anti-angiogenic treatment.

A case of multiple metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma with complete response to nivolumab

Background

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC) is associated with poor prognosis. Although there is no standard treatment for SRCC, recent studies have reported the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Case

An 82‐year‐old Japanese man presented to our hospital with an incidental right renal tumor. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed an exophytic tumor in the right kidney with suspected right iliopsoas muscle invasion. Laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy was performed. Histopathological diagnosis revealed a clear cell RCC with a spindle cell carcinoma component. CT performed 3 months after surgery revealed multiple bilateral lung metastases and local recurrence. Although the patient received tyrosine‐kinase inhibitors for treating multiple metastases, the lung metastases continued to gradually increase, and peritonitis carcinomatosis was observed. Thus, the patient was intravenously administered nivolumab once every 2 weeks. After nivolumab administration, lung metastases, local recurrence, and peritonitis carcinomatosis gradually reduced. After 20 months of nivolumab treatment, the patient achieved a complete response of multiple metastases on CT.

Conclusion

Nivolumab may be used as a treatment option for sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma with multiple metastases.

Targeted therapy response in early versus late recurrence of renal cell carcinoma after surgical treatment: A propensity score-matched study using the Korean Renal Cancer Study Group database

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinicopathological features and outcomes of targeted therapy in patients with recurrence of renal cell carcinoma in <5 years or ≥5 years after the surgical treatment for renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy in a multicenter database were retrospectively characterized according to time from surgery to recurrence. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence within 5 years after surgery, and late recurrence was defined as occurring ≥5 years after surgery. The propensity scores for recurrence status were calculated, and patients with late recurrence were matched to patients with early recurrence at a 1:3 ratio. The oncological outcomes of targeted therapy in both groups were compared.

RESULTS

Among 716 patients, 512 (71.5%) experienced early recurrence and 204 (28.5%) experienced late recurrence. The patients with late recurrence presented with younger age at surgery, lower tumor stages and Fuhrman grade, and fewer sarcomatoid features and lymphovascular invasion (all P < 0.005). All differences in clinicopathological characteristics before targeted therapy disappeared after matching. Patients with late recurrence had significantly longer median overall survival (56 months vs 36 months; P < 0.0001) and median first-line progression-free survival (12 months vs 8 months; P = 0.031). The early recurrence status was a significantly worse predictor for overall survival and first-line progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.30, P = 0.007; and hazard ratio 1.76, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Late recurrence might have prognostic value in terms of oncological outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy.

Molecular Subsets in Renal Cancer Determine Outcome to Checkpoint and Angiogenesis Blockade

Integrated multi-omics evaluation of 823 tumors from advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients identifies molecular subsets associated with differential clinical outcomes to angiogenesis blockade alone or with a checkpoint inhibitor. Unsupervised transcriptomic analysis reveals seven molecular subsets with distinct angiogenesis, immune, cell-cycle, metabolism, and stromal programs. While sunitinib and atezolizumab + bevacizumab are effective in subsets with high angiogenesis, atezolizumab + bevacizumab improves clinical benefit in tumors with high T-effector and/or cell-cycle transcription. Somatic mutations in PBRM1 and KDM5C associate with high angiogenesis and AMPK/fatty acid oxidation gene expression, while CDKN2A/B and TP53 alterations associate with increased cell-cycle and anabolic metabolism. Sarcomatoid tumors exhibit lower prevalence of PBRM1 mutations and angiogenesis markers, frequent CDKN2A/B alterations, and increased PD-L1 expression. These findings can be applied to molecularly stratify patients, explain improved outcomes of sarcomatoid tumors to checkpoint blockade versus antiangiogenics alone, and develop personalized therapies in RCC and other indications.

Outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation to immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation (sRCC) is associated with poor survival outcomes. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with sRCC comparing clear-cell (sccRCC) to non-clear cell epithelial histology (snccRCC).

METHODS

We performed retrospective analysis of sRCC patients who received ICI at MD Anderson Cancer Center (n = 48, 41 with ccRCC and 7 with nccRCC) to determine the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Additionally, we performed a prespecified multivariable Cox regression comparing survival outcomes between sccRCC and snccRCC.

RESULTS

The ORR for the entire cohort was 35.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.4%, 49.6%), including 8 (16.7%) patients (95% CI: 8.7%, 29.6%) who achieved a complete remission. The disease control rate was 52% (95% CI: 38.3%, 65.5%). In patients with sccRCC, the ORR was 39% (95% CI: 25.7%, 54.3%) and disease control rate 58.5% (43.4%, 72.2%). Among 7 snccRCC patients, only one (14.3%) achieved an objective partial response. At a median follow-up of 51.1 months, the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 2.7, 16.3) and the median OS was 28.4 months (95% CI: 15.8, NA) for the entire cohort. For patients with sccRCC, the median PFS was 8.9 months, with median OS of 30.1 months, compared with median PFS of 2.3 months (HR 0.25 [95% CI: 0.08, 0.78]; P= 0.0145) and median OS of 6.7 months (HR 0.13 [95% CI 0.04, 0.44]; P=0.0009) for patients with snccRCC.

CONCLUSION

ICIs appear to be effective in sccRCC while the treatment of snccRCC remains challenging.

Prognostic Significance of Sarcomatoid Differentiation in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

To date, the prognostic value of sarcomatoid differentiation in patients having metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains inconclusive. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted.

Materials and Methods

Relevant literatures were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library published prior to May, 2020. All patients were diagnosed with mRCC and treated with surgery, cytokine therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Sarcomatoid differentiation in the pathological specimens was identified. Each endpoint [overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS)] was assessed using a multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Fifteen observational studies having 5,828 patients with mRCC were included. The merged results showed that patients presenting sarcomatoid differentiation had a significantly inferior OS (HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.82-2.81; P < 0.001), PFS (HR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.63-3.19; P < 0.001), and CSS (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.51-3.40; P < 0.001) compared to those without sarcomatoid differentiation. Subgroup analysis based on publication year, patient population, country, number of cases, and NOS score did not change the direction of results. A significant publication bias was identified for OS, but no publication bias was identified for PFS. Moreover, sensitivity analysis also verified the robustness of the results.

Conclusion

This study suggested that sarcomatoid differentiation was correlated to unfavorable clinical outcomes in mRCC and may be a poor prognostic factor incorporating to prognostic models for mRCC patients.

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: biology, natural history and management

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is an uncommon feature that can occur in most histological subtypes of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and carries a decidedly poor prognosis. Historically, conventional treatments for sarcomatoid RCCs (sRCCs) have shown little efficacy, and median survival is commonly 6–13 months. Despite being first described in 1968, the mechanisms driving sarcomatoid dedifferentiation remain poorly understood, and information and treatment options available to physicians and patients are limited. When diagnosed at an early stage, surgical intervention remains the treatment of choice. However, preoperative identification through routine imaging or biopsy is unreliable and most patients present with advanced disease and systemic symptoms. For these patients, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy is disputed. The expansion of immunotherapies approved for RCCs has generated a search for biomarkers that might be indicative of treatment response in sRCCs, although a proven effective systemic agent remains elusive. PDL1 expression is increased in sarcomatoid dedifferentiated renal tumours, which suggests that patients with sRCCs could benefit from PD1 and/or PDL1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Treatment outcomes for sarcomatoid tumours have remained relatively consistent compared with other RCCs, but further investigation of the tumour–immune cell microenvironment might yield insights into further therapeutic possibilities.

In this Review, Blum et al. summarize the current knowledge on sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma, a diagnosis characterized by the presence of sarcomatoid dedifferentiation and a poor prognosis. They discuss the origin, presentation, molecular biology and treatment of this disease.

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is not considered to be a unique histological subtype of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs); rather, it can be present within any subtype of RCCs.

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation appears in ~4% of all RCCs, but is present in ~20% of all metastatic RCCs. According to WHO guidelines, any RCC with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is a WHO–International Society of Urological Pathology grade 4 lesion.

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is often heterogeneously present within RCCs, making routine imaging and biopsy unreliable for preoperative detection. Surgical resection for localized disease is the standard of care, with subsequent close monitoring of patients following surgery.

In patients with metastatic disease, conventional therapies such as surgery and systemic agents have been ineffective and overall 5-year survival remains at 23.5–33%.

Previous genomic analyses have failed to identify definitive mutational drivers of disease. However, sarcomatoid RCCs (sRCCs) have been shown to have higher PD1 and PDL1 expression than other subtypes of RCCs. Newer combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies could yield improved responses and outcomes.

Studies investigating sRCCs are limited by patient numbers owing to the low incidence of sRCCs and their advanced stage at presentation. Multi-institutional efforts to establish a consensus on treatment recommendations based on highly powered data are essential.

Predicting Response to Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Immunotherapy-based treatment options have become standard of care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Despite significant improvement in overall survival with these therapies, the tumors of many patients will eventually progress. This review highlights the ongoing efforts to develop biomarkers to help predict which patients are most likely to benefit from treatment with immunotherapy.

Abstract

Immunotherapy-based combinations, driven by PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 inhibitors, has altered the treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Despite significant improvements in clinical outcomes, many patients do not experience deep or lasting benefits. Recent efforts to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from immunotherapy and immunotherapy-based combinations have shown promise but have not yet affected clinical practice. PD-L1 expression via immunohistochemistry (IHC) has shown promise in a few clinical trials, although variations in the IHC assays as well as the use of different values for positivity presents unique challenges for this potential biomarker. Several other candidate biomarkers were investigated including tumor mutational burden, gene expression signatures, single gene mutations, human endogenous retroviruses, the gastrointestinal microbiome, and peripheral blood laboratory markers. While individually these biomarkers have yet to explain the heterogeneity of treatment response to immunotherapy, using aggregate information from these biomarkers may inform clinically useful predictive biomarkers.

Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in First-line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features (sRCC) have poor prognoses and suboptimal outcomes with targeted therapy. This post hoc analysis of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial analyzed the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) versus sunitinib in patients with sRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with sRCC were identified via independent central pathology review of archival tumor tissue or histologic classification per local pathology report. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) every 3 weeks (four doses) then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or sunitinib 50 mg orally every day (4 weeks; 6-week cycles). Outcomes in patients with sRCC were not prespecified. Endpoints in patients with sRCC and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate/poor-risk disease included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) per independent radiology review, and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Safety outcomes used descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of 1,096 randomized patients in CheckMate 214, 139 patients with sRCC and intermediate/poor-risk disease and six with favorable-risk disease were identified. With 42 months' minimum follow-up in patients with sRCC and intermediate/poor-risk disease, median OS [95% confidence interval (CI)] favored NIVO+IPI [not reached (NR) (25.2-not estimable [NE]); n = 74] versus sunitinib [14.2 months (9.3-22.9); n = 65; HR, 0.45 (95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P = 0.0004)]; PFS benefits with NIVO+IPI were similarly observed [median 26.5 vs. 5.1 months; HR, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.33-0.86; P = 0.0093)]. Confirmed ORR was 60.8% with NIVO+IPI versus 23.1% with sunitinib, with complete response rates of 18.9% versus 3.1%, respectively. No new safety signals emerged.

CONCLUSIONS

NIVO+IPI showed unprecedented long-term survival, response, and complete response benefits versus sunitinib in previously untreated patients with sRCC and intermediate/poor-risk disease, supporting the use of first-line NIVO+IPI for this population.See related commentary by Hwang et al., p. 5.

Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Versus Sunitinib for Patients with Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Sarcomatoid Features: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the IMmotion151 Clinical Trial

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features (sRCC) have a poor prognosis and have shown limited responsiveness to inhibition of the VEGF pathway. We conducted a prespecified analysis of the randomised, phase 3 IMmotion151 trial in previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic RCC to assess the effectiveness of atezolizumab + bevacizumab versus sunitinib in a subgroup of patients with sarcomatoid features. Patients whose tumour had any component of sarcomatoid features were included and received atezolizumab + bevacizumab (n = 68) or sunitinib (n = 74). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the group receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab overall (8.3 vs 5.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 0.52 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.79) and in the subset of patients with PD-L1-positive tumours (8.6 vs 5.6 mo; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.77). More patients receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab achieved an objective response (49% vs 14%), including complete responses (10% vs 3%), and reported greater symptom improvements versus sunitinib. Safety was consistent with the known profiles of each drug and with that reported in the overall safety-evaluable population of IMmotion151. This analysis supports enhanced activity of atezolizumab + bevacizumab in patients with sRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at patients with a specific type of kidney cancer (tumours with sarcomatoid features) that has been hard to treat. A treatment with two drugs (atezolizumab and bevacizumab) appeared to help patients live longer without the disease getting worse than another drug (sunitinib) that is often used. Patients who took the two drugs also said they were better able to carry out their everyday activities than patients who took sunitinib. The combination of these two drugs may work better in patients with this type of advanced kidney cancer.

Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management: an expert panel recommendation from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG)

PURPOSE

The outcome of RCC has improved considerably in the last few years, and the treatment options have increased. LACOG-GU and LARCG held a consensus meeting to develop guidelines to support the clinical decisions of physicians and other health professionals involved in the care of RCC patients.

METHODS

Eighty questions addressing relevant advanced RCC treatments were previously formulated by a panel of experts. The voting panel comprised 26 specialists from the LACOG-GU/LARCG. Consensus was determined as 75% agreement. For questions with less than 75% agreement, a new discussion was held, and consensus was determined by the majority of votes after the second voting session.

RESULTS

The recommendations were based on the highest level of scientific evidence or by the opinion of the RCC experts when no relevant research data were available.

CONCLUSION

This manuscript provides guidance for advanced RCC treatment according to the LACOG-GU/LARCG expert recommendations.

The impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy on survival outcomes in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a real-world cohort

BACKGROUND

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (TKI) has changed the treatment paradigm of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The recent CARMENA and SURTIME trials challenged the role of the cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of CN prior to TKI therapy in patients with mRCC in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Overall, 262 consecutive patients with mRCC were treated with CN plus TKI or TKI only at our institution between 2000 and 2016. Patients with prior immunotherapy or metastasectomy were excluded. Multiple imputation and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to account for missing values and imbalances between the treatment groups, respectively. Unadjusted and adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine differences in progression-free (PFS), overall (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

Overall, 104 (40%) patients received CN before TKI treatment. Most frequent first line therapy was Sunitinib (66%), followed by Sorafenib (20%) and Pazopanib (10%). After adjustment with IPTW, there was no difference in PFS, CSS, and OS (all P > 0.05) between the treatment groups. In subgroup analyses, CSS was improved when CN was performed in patients with sarcomatoid features and clear cell histology (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03) and PFS was improved in patients with clear cell histology when CN was performed [0.04]). CN did not improve OS in any subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

The role of CN remains controversial. We found no difference in survival outcomes between patients treated with and without CN before TKI therapy. However, CN was associated with improved survival in specific patient subgroups. Tailored, individualized treatment is key to further improve oncological outcomes for mRCC.

The genetic landscapes of urological cancers and their clinical implications in the era of high-throughput genome analysis

OBJECTIVE

With the advent of high-throughput genome analysis, we are increasingly able to sequence and hence understand the pathogenic processes underlying individual cancers. Recently, consortiums such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) have performed large-scale projects to this end, providing significant amounts of information regarding the genetic landscapes of several cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a narrative review of studies from the TCGA and other major studies. We aimed to summarise data exploring the clinical implications of specific genetic alterations, both prognostically and therapeutically, in four major urological cancers. These were renal cell carcinoma, muscle-invasive bladder cancer/carcinoma, prostate cancer, and testicular germ cell tumours.

RESULTS

With these four urological cancers, great strides have been made in the molecular characterisation of tumours. In particular, recent studies have focussed on identifying molecular subtypes of tumours with characteristic genetic alterations and differing prognoses. Other prognostic alterations have also recently been identified, including those pertaining to epigenetics and microRNAs. In regard to treatment, numerous options are emerging for patients with these cancers such as including immune checkpoint inhibition, epigenetic-based treatments, and agents targeting MAPK, PI3K, and DNA repair pathways. There are a multitude of trials underway investigating the effects of these novel agents, the results of which are eagerly awaited.

CONCLUSIONS

As medicine chases the era of personalised care, it is becoming increasingly important to provide individualised prognoses for patients. Understanding how specific genetic alterations affects prognosis is key for this. It will also be crucial to provide highly targeted treatments against the specific genetics of a patient's tumour. With work performed by the TCGA and other large consortiums, these aims are gradually being achieved. Our review provides a succinct overview of this exciting field that may underpin personalised medicine in urological oncology.

Nodular Vascular Transformation of the Lymph Node Sinuses Mimicking Sarcomatoid Change in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Vascular transformation of the lymph node sinuses (VTS) is an uncommon phenomenon that is believed to occur secondary to obstruction of efferent lymphatics, frequently occuring in retroperitoneal lymph nodes draining cancer. The nodular subtype of VTS, in particular, can mimic metastatic cancer, such as metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation, potentially resulting in inaccurate tumor grading and/or staging. We present a case of nodular VTS mimicking metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation in a patient with high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and explore the relevant differential diagnosis. Awareness of VTS is essential to avoid misdiagnosis of this benign and curative condition.

Avelumab and axitinib in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: safety and efficacy

Introduction: The incidence of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing. Over the last 10 years targeted therapies have led to improved efficacy outcomes for renal carcinoma, including longer survival. However, the majority of patients develop disease progression within a year of initiation of first-line therapy. Recently a number of new regimens have been investigated including the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with VEGF inhibitors.Areas covered: In this review, we assess the efficacy and safety of avelumab/axitinib in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic RCC and compare this combination to other current and emerging treatment regimens. In the Javelin 101 phase III registration trial, avelumab/axitinib demonstrated superior response rates and progression-free survival compared to sunitinib. However, after follow-up of 11.6 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS). Avelumab/axitinib showed a tolerable safety profile. Adverse events were manageable and were in line with expected toxicities from the single agents.Expert Opinion: Avelumab/axitinib has shown impressive efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in metastatic RCC. The future role of this treatment combination in the rapidly evolving landscape of novel combinations in this disease will have to be defined.

Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in patients with renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation

Renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation (RCCs) is rare, accounting for 1-8% of all RCC histological subtypes. In this study, we examined 139 patients with RCCs and aimed to explore their clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors. From January 2007 to January 2019, patients who were pathologically diagnosed with RCCs were included in this retrospective study. Data on clinicopathologic features and overall survival were collected. The expression of CK, vimentin, CK7, and CD10 in the sarcomatoid regions of RCCs was detected. The Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to describe the effect of clinicopathologic characteristics on overall survival. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate risk factors for prognosis. A total of 139 patients with RCCs were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years. The median survival time of all patients was 39 months. The three- and five-year survival rates were 50.2% and 44.0%, respectively. A high pathologic T stage (pT3 and pT4), microvascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis were significant predictors of prognosis. Pathologic T4 stage and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with RCCs. Furthermore, the expression of CD10 was a prognostic factor for overall survival. In this study, a relatively large cohort of patients with RCCs was analyzed. We summarized the clinicopathologic features of RCCs and explored the risk factors for prognosis. Our findings may provide valuable prediction for clinical strategy.

Salvage ipilimumab associated with a significant response in sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is an aggressive variant of RCC with generally poor prognosis. Treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors or chemotherapy generates only short-lived responses. Recent research has suggested a role for combination checkpoint inhibition as first line treatment for metastatic sRCC. This therapy consists of induction with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitor, ipilimumab, administered with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, nivolumab. After completion of four cycles of combination therapy, single-agent maintenance nivolumab is recommended until progression. Patients who progress on maintenance nivolumab are switched to alternate therapy. Herein, we present a case of a patient with RCC who progressed on maintenance nivolumab who, on retreatment with ipilimumab, demonstrated a significant response In addition, we summarize important findings to support the role of salvage ipilimumab in patients with sRCC.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 46-year-old man presented with flank pain and hematuria, the work up of which noted a left kidney mass for which he underwent nephrectomy and was diagnosed with localized sRCC with 60% sarcomatoid differentiation. Within 3 months of nephrectomy, he presented with recurrent flank pain and was diagnosed with recurrence of disease. He was treated with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg and nivolumab 3 mg/kg for four doses and demonstrated a partial response. He was then transitioned to single agent nivolumab maintenance. After 3 months on maintenance therapy, he was noted to have progression of disease. Given prior response to immune check point combination, it was decided to rechallenge the patient with 1 mg/kg ipilimumab. After two doses of ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy, the patient was noted to have a partial response. He maintained a response for an additional 9 months and treatment was eventually discontinued due to grade 3 toxicity and progression.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report demonstrates the utility of retreatment with ipilimumab as a salvage option for patients progressing on maintenance PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic RCC. Further studies are needed to identify predictors of response and toxicity to this approach, as well as the optimal scheduling of ipilimumab with maintenance nivolumab.

Molecular characterization of sarcomatoid clear cell renal cell carcinoma unveils new candidate oncogenic drivers

Sarcomatoid clear-cell renal cell carcinomas (sRCC) are associated with dismal prognosis. Genomic alterations associated with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation are poorly characterized. We sought to define the genomic landscape of sRCC and uncover potentially actionable therapeutic targets. We assessed the genomic landscape of sRCC using targeted panel sequencing including patients with microdissected sarcomatoid and epithelial components. Along with common genomic alterations associated with clear-cell histology, we found that Hippo was one of the most frequently altered pathways in these tumours. Hippo alterations were differentially enriched in sRCC compared to non-sRCC. Functional analysis showed that Hippo members mutations were associated with higher nuclear accumulation of YAP/TAZ, core effectors of the Hippo pathway. In a NF2-mutant sRCC model, YAP1 knockdown and NF2 reconstitution suppressed cell proliferation, tumour growth and invasion, both in vitro and in vivo. Overall, we show that Hippo pathway alterations are a feature of sRCC, and enable the exploration of the Hippo pathway as a novel potential therapeutic target.

Sarcomatoid Dedifferentiation in Renal Cell Carcinoma: From Novel Molecular Insights to New Clinical Opportunities

Sarcomatoid features in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have long been associated with dismal prognosis and poor response to therapy, while biological mechanisms underpinning sarcomatoid dedifferentiation remained obscure. Several efforts have been conducted to break down the molecular profile of sarcomatoid RCC and investigate different targeted therapeutic approaches. Mutations enriched for in sarcomatoid RCC involve, notably, TP53, BAP1, cell cycle, and chromatin-remodeling genes. The immunological landscape of these tumors is also gradually being uncovered, showing frequent expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. These features may be major determinants for the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this population, which has been confirmed by retrospective studies and subgroup analyses of large randomized phase 3 trials. Combinations based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition have demonstrated response rates and complete responses in >50% and >10% of patients in the first-line metastatic setting, respectively, with median overall survival exceeding two years. This remarkable improvement in outcomes effectively establishes immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations as a new standard of care in patients with sarcomatoid RCC. New research fields, including epigenetic regulations and tumor-microenvironment interactions, may further sharpen understanding of sarcomatoid RCC and advance therapeutic developments.