1
|
Ju JW, Lee HJ. Reply to: "Preoperative COVID-19 and Postoperative Mortality in Cancer Surgery: Correspondence", by Daungsupawong and Wiwanitkit. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15992-5. [PMID: 39103686 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15992-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Woo Ju
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Jin Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slater NN, Farsi S, Rogers AL, Herberger L, Penagaricano J, McKee S, King D, Samanta S, Sunde J, Vural E, Moreno MA. Reirradiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; prognostic indicators, oncologic and functional outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104482. [PMID: 39116720 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic alternatives. While reirradiation is feasible, it is usually associated with high treatment toxicity and is not yet considered the standard of care. Based on current NCCN guidelines, in the context of very advanced head and neck cancer (recurrent and/or persistent disease), surgical intervention is explored initially with/without adjuvants while unresectable disease is approached with radiation and/or systemic therapies. Specific and reliable prognostic indicators for both -oncologic and functional outcomes- have yet to be defined for this population. METHODS Retrospective chart review of 54 patients treated with reirradiation at a tertiary academic institution between January of 1998 and January of 2024. Only patients with non-metastatic recurrent, and second primary HNSCC were included in the series. Demographics, staging, radiation dose and technique, additional therapy, histopathologic variables, EORTC toxicity, pre- and post-treatment PEG/tracheotomy dependency and oncologic outcomes were retrieved. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 54 patients (37 males, 17 females) with HNSCC, averaging 62.7 years in age. Initial tumors were locally advanced in over 42 % of cases, with 58 % being node-negative. The head and cutaneous regions (24.5 %) and tongue (20.8 %) were the most common tumor sites. Primary surgical resection and adjuvant radiation were performed in 47.2 % of cases, and concurrent chemotherapy was used in 40.7 %. Reirradiation was mainly for local or regional recurrence (88.9 %), often following salvage surgery (68.5 %), with a mean dose of 5623 Gy over 52.5 fractions. Positive surgical margins were present in 29.4 % of cases, and extracapsular spread in 59.5 %. No significant differences were found between the salvage surgery and definitive reirradiation groups except for tumor site (P = 0.022). Median follow-up was 52.6 months, with 27 deaths reported. Lymphovascular invasion was significantly correlated with overall survival (P = 0.017), while initial tumor T-stage and neck disease involvement were linked to local-regional control (P = 0.030 and P = 0.033, respectively). Reirradiation increased tracheotomy and PEG-tube dependency by 20 % (P = 0.011) and 23 % (P = 0.003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation is a feasible therapeutic alternative in recurrent head and neck SCC. Oncologic outcomes observed in this series compare favorably to most published reports. Complete response and perineural invasion were independent prognostic factors for survival and locoregional control. While no mortality directly associated with treatment was observed in this series, reirradiation had a significant impact in functional outcomes in terms of increased risk of tracheotomy and peg tube dependency. Further studies are required to define the role of this treatment in head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah N Slater
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Soroush Farsi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Ashton L Rogers
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Lindsey Herberger
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Jose Penagaricano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Steven McKee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Deanne King
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Santanu Samanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Jumin Sunde
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Emre Vural
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America
| | - Mauricio A Moreno
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street #543, Little Rock, AR 72205-1709, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang JL, Chang JTC, Yeh CH, Chang TY, Huang BS, Sung PS, Lin CY, Fan KH, Wei YC, Liu CH. Incidence of Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer after Radiation Therapy: A Cohort Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1222. [PMID: 38928638 PMCID: PMC11202696 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14121222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a rare yet life-threatening complication that occurs after radiation therapy (RT). This study aimed to determine the incidence of CBS in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing contemporary RT and to explore potential discrepancies in the risk of CBS between nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and non-NPC patients. A total of 1084 patients with HNC who underwent RT between 2013 and 2023 were included in the study. All patients were under regular follow-ups at the radio-oncology department, and underwent annual contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging for cancer recurrence surveillance. Experienced neuroradiologists and vascular neurologists reviewed the recruited patients' images. Patients were further referred to the neurology department for radiation vasculopathy evaluation. The primary outcome of this study was CBS. Patients were categorized into NPC and non-NPC groups and survival analysis was employed to compare the CBS risk between the two groups. A review of the literature on CBS incidence was also conducted. Among the enrolled patients, the incidence of CBS in the HNC, NPC, and non-NPC groups was 0.8%, 0.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between the NPC and non-NPC groups (p = 0.34). Combining the findings for our cohort with those of previous studies revealed that the cumulative incidence of CBS in patients with HNC is 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after both surgery and RT, 4% (95% CI = 2-6%) after surgery alone, and 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after RT alone. Our findings indicate a low incidence of CBS in patients with HNC undergoing contemporary RT. Patients with NPC may have a CBS risk close to that of non-NPC patients. However, the low incidence of CBS could be a potentially cause of selection bias and underestimation bias.
Collapse
Grants
- CMRPG3M0811, CMRPG381503, CMRPG3C0763, CMRPG3G0261, CFRPG3L0011, and BMRPF99 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- grants 106-2511-S-182A-002-MY2, 108-2314-B-182A-050-MY3, 111-2314-B-182A-133-MY3, NMRPG3M6231-3, NMRPG3G6411-2, and NMRPG3J6131-3 Ministry of Science and Technology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Lin Jiang
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
| | - Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
- Taipei Chang Gung Head & Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hua Yeh
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Neuroradiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Yu Chang
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Shen Huang
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
- Taipei Chang Gung Head & Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
| | - Pi-Shan Sung
- Department of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yu Lin
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
- Taipei Chang Gung Head & Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
- Radiation Research Core Laboratory, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Hsing Fan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New Taipei Municipal Tu-Cheng Hospital, New Taipei City 236, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Wei
- Department of Neurology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 83301, Taiwan
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Hung Liu
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yamazaki H, Suzuki G, Aibe N, Shiomi H, Oh RJ, Yoshida K, Nakamura S, Konishi K, Matsuyama T, Ogita M. Re-irradiation for isolated neck recurrence in head and neck tumor: impact of rN category. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3107. [PMID: 38326404 PMCID: PMC10850055 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53438-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Unresectable, isolated lymph node recurrence after radiotherapy is rare but a candidate for re-irradiation. However, severe toxicity is anticipated. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the efficacy and toxicity of re-irradiation in isolated lymph node recurrence of head and neck lesions. We analyzed 46 patients who received re-irradiation for lymph node recurrence without local progression. The primary tumor sites included the oral cavity in 17 patients, the hypopharynx in 12, the oropharynx in seven, the larynx in three, the nasopharynx in two, and other sites. During a median follow-up time of 10 months, the median survival time was 10.6 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 45.5%. The 1-year local control and progression-free survival rates were 49.8% and 39.3%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, age (≥ 65 years), the interval between treatment (≥ 12 months), rN category (rN1), and gross tumor volume (GTV < 25 cm3) were predisposing factors for better survival. In the multivariate analysis, the rN category and interval were identified as statistically significant predictors. Late toxicity grade ≥ 3 occurred in four patients (8.6%). These were all Grade 5 carotid blowout syndrome, which associated with tumor invasion of the carotid artery and/ or high doses administration for the carotid artery. Small-volume rN1 tumor that recur after a longer interval is a feasible candidate for re-irradiation. However, strict patient selection and meticulous care for the carotid are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
- CyberKnife Center, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Gen Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Hiroya Shiomi
- CyberKnife Center, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryoong-Jin Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miyakojima IGRT Clinic, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Satoaki Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Matsuyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Mikio Ogita
- Radiotherapy Department, Fujimoto Hayasuzu Hospital, Miyakonojo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pannunzio S, Di Bello A, Occhipinti D, Scala A, Messina G, Valente G, Quirino M, Di Salvatore M, Tortora G, Cassano A. Multimodality treatment in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: current therapy, challenges, and future perspectives. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1288695. [PMID: 38239635 PMCID: PMC10794486 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1288695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is a complex group of diseases that presents a challenge to the clinician. The prognosis in the recurrent/metastatic disease is particularly dismal, with a median survival of approximately 12 months. Recently, the personalized and multimodal approach has increased prognosis by integrating locoregional strategies (salvage surgery and stereotactic radiotherapy) and systemic treatments (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapy). Malnutrition is a significant clinical problem that interferes with dose intensity, and thus, feeding supplementation is critical not only to increase the quality of life but also to improve overall survival. With this review, we want to emphasize the importance of the multidisciplinary approach, quality of life, and nutritional supportive care and to integrate the latest updates of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy and future therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Pannunzio
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
| | - Armando Di Bello
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
| | - Denis Occhipinti
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scala
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
| | - Gloria Messina
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
| | - Giustina Valente
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
| | - Michela Quirino
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
| | - Mariantonietta Di Salvatore
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Roma, Italy
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mohamed AS, Martin GV, Ng SP, Takiar V, Beadle BM, Zafereo M, Garden AS, Frank SJ, David Fuller C, Brandon Gunn G, Morrison WH, Rosenthal DI, Reddy J, Moreno A, Lee A, Phan J. Patterns of failure for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with salvage surgery and postoperative IMRT reirradiation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100700. [PMID: 38058404 PMCID: PMC10695834 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate patterns of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after surgical salvage and adjuvant reirradiation with IMRT for recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Materials/Methods Patterns of LRR for 61 patients treated consecutively between 2003 and 2014 who received post-operative IMRT reirradiation to ≥ 60 Gy for recurrent HNSCC were determined by 2 methods: 1) physician classification via visual comparison of post-radiotherapy imaging to reirradiation plans; and 2) using deformable image registration (DIR). Those without evaluable CT planning image data were excluded. All recurrences were verified by biopsy or radiological progression. Failures were defined as in-field, marginal, or out-of-field. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for LRR. Results A total of 55 patients were eligible for analysis and 23 (42 %) had documented LRR after reirradiation. Location of recurrent disease prior to salvage surgery (lymphatic vs. mucosal) was the most significant predictor of LRR after post-operative reirradiation with salvage rate of 67 % for lymphatic vs. 33 % for mucosal sites (p = 0.037). Physician classification of LRR yielded 14 (61 %) in-field failures, 3 (13 %) marginal failures, and 6 (26 %) out-of-field failures, while DIR yielded 10 (44 %) in-field failures, 4 (17 %) marginal failures, and 9 (39 %) out-of-field failures. Most failures (57 %) occurred within the original site of recurrence or first echelon lymphatic drainage. Of patients who had a free flap placed during salvage surgery, 56 % of failures occurred within 1 cm of the surgical flap. Conclusion Our study highlights the role of DIR in enhancing the accuracy and consistency of POF analysis. Compared to traditional visual inspection, DIR reduces interobserver variability and provides more nuanced insights into dose-specific and spatial parameters of locoregional recurrences. Additionally, the study identifies the location of the initial recurrence as a key predictor of subsequent locoregional recurrence after salvage surgery and re-IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdallah S.R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Geoffrey V. Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vinita Takiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Beth M. Beadle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Mark Zafereo
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C. David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G. Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alterio D, Zaffaroni M, Bossi P, Dionisi F, Elicin O, Falzone A, Ferrari A, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Sanguineti G, Szturz P, Volpe S, Scricciolo M. Reirradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a pragmatic approach-part I: prognostic factors and indications to treatment. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:160-173. [PMID: 37731151 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01713-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reirradiation (reRT) of locally recurrent/second primary tumors of the head and neck region is a potentially curative treatment for patients not candidate to salvage surgery. Aim of the present study is to summarize available literature on both prognostic factors and indications to curative reRT in this clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS A narrative review of the literature was performed on two topics: (1) patients' selection according to prognostic factors and (2) dosimetric feasibility of reRT. Postoperative reRT and palliative intent treatments were out of the scope of this work. RESULTS Patient-tumor and treatment-related prognostic factors were analyzed, together with dosimetric parameters concerning target volume and organs at risk. Based on available evidence, a stepwise approach has been proposed aiming to provide a useful tool to identify suitable candidates for curative reRT in clinical practice. This was then applied to two clinical cases, proposed at the end of this work. CONCLUSION A second course of RT in head and neck recurrence/second primary tumors is a personalized approach that can be offered to selected patients only in centers with expertise and dedicated equipment following a multidisciplinary team discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Dionisi
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Falzone
- Unità Operativa Multizonale di Radiologia Ospedale di Rovereto e Arco, Azienda Sanitaria per i Servizi Provinciali di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Annamaria Ferrari
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Petr Szturz
- Department of Oncology, University of Lausanne (UNIL) and Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li J, Huang L, Wu H, Li J, Cao X, Liu Z. Re-irradiation for recurrent cervical cancer: A single institutional experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 43:100690. [PMID: 37876912 PMCID: PMC10590764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Salvage treatment of recurrent cervical cancer of patients with a history of radiotherapy is currently a major clinical challenge. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively analyze clinical outcomes of radiation in patients with recurrent cancer who have previously received radiotherapy at our hospital and further explore the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent re-irradiation were included in our department between January 2015 and December 2017. All the patients received Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) alone or VMAT followed by three dimensional-image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT). The volume and dose for re-irradiation depended on previous radiation fields, dosimetry and recurrence sites. All patients received systemic chemotherapy before or after re-irradiation. Results Fifty patients were included in our study. The median time from primary radiotherapy to re-irradiation was 12 months. Local recurrence, which was the most common failure following primary treatment, was present in 25 patients (50.0 %) while regional recurrence, loco-regional recurrence and distant recurrence combined in-filed recurrence was present in 8 (16.0 %), 9 (18.0 %) and 8 patients (16.0 %). Re-irradiation dose to lymph nodes was 45 Gy with or without a boost up to 55-60 Gy, and to the gross mass was 36-45 Gy with or without a boost up to 45-61 Gy. The median follow-up period was 22 (range,4-59) months. The 3-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 58.0, 38.7, and 44.4 %, respectively. The median time of PFS and OS was 14 and 26 months, respectively. The interval between two successive radiotherapies beyond 12 months was significantly associated with better LC and PFS (p ≤ 0.05), but without the benefit of OS (p > 0.05). Serum SCC antigen level less than 1.5 ng/ml had a significantly better impact on PFS (p ≤ 0.05). Overall, 14 patients (28 %) experienced ≥ grade 3 acute toxicities, while 9 (18 %) experienced ≥ grade 3 late toxicities. Conclusions Re-irradiation with VMAT is an effective and safe salvage treatment option with a reasonably good clinical outcome and toxicity profile in selected patients. In our experience, recurrent cancer patients with an interval between two successive radiotherapy courses beyond 12 months and with a serum SCC-Ag level less than 1.5 ng/ml, had improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Lin Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Haiying Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Jia Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Xinping Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Zhimin Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen AM, Harris JP, Gan M, Nabar R, Tjoa T, Haidar YM, Truong A, Chow DS, Armstrong WB. Posttreatment Surveillance Imaging After Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2342825. [PMID: 37948074 PMCID: PMC10638654 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance The role of surveillance imaging after treatment for head and neck cancer is controversial and evidence to support decision-making is limited. Objective To determine the use of surveillance imaging in asymptomatic patients with head and neck cancer in remission after completion of chemoradiation. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a retrospective, comparative effectiveness research review of adult patients who had achieved a complete metabolic response to initial treatment for head and neck cancer as defined by having an unequivocally negative positron emission tomography (PET) scan using the PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) scale within the first 6 months of completing therapy. The medical records of 501 consecutive patients who completed definitive radiation therapy (with or without chemotherapy) for newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck between January 2014 and June 2022 were reviewed. Exposure Surveillance imaging was defined as the acquisition of a PET with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or CT of the head and neck region in the absence of any clinically suspicious symptoms and/or examination findings. For remaining patients, subsequent surveillance after the achievement of a complete metabolic response to initial therapy was performed on an observational basis in the setting of routine follow-up using history-taking and physical examination, including endoscopy. This expectant approach led to imaging only in the presence of clinically suspicious symptoms and/or physical examination findings. Main Outcome and Measures Local-regional control, overall survival, and progression-free survival based on assignment to either the surveillance imaging or expectant management cohort. Results This study included 340 patients (mean [SD] age, 59 [10] years; 201 males [59%]; 88 Latino patients [26%]; 145 White patients [43%]) who achieved a complete metabolic response during this period. There was no difference in 3-year local-regional control, overall survival, progression-free survival, or freedom from distant metastasis between patients treated with surveillance imaging vs those treated expectantly. Conclusions and Relevance In this comparative effectiveness research, imaging-based surveillance failed to improve outcomes compared with expectant management for patients who were seemingly in remission after completion of primary radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allen M. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Jeremy P. Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Meng Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Rupali Nabar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Tjoson Tjoa
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Yarah M. Haidar
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Annie Truong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - Daniel S. Chow
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | - William B. Armstrong
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hartl DM, Guerlain J, Gorphe P, Kapre M, Kapre Gupta N, Saba NF, Robbins KT, Ronen O, Rodrigo JP, Strojan P, Mäkitie AA, Kowalski LP, Shah JP, Ferlito A. Review of Outcomes after Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4692. [PMID: 37835386 PMCID: PMC10571840 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is the mainstay in treatment for advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; however, locoregional recurrences are frequent. Salvage surgery could be proposed in selected patients to improve local control, disease-free, and overall survival. Factors for improved disease-free and overall survival in patients treated with salvage surgery include age, tumor location, the initial T stage, HPV status, resection margins, and the time elapsing from the initial treatment. Clinical trials with adjuvant therapies have shown promise after salvage surgery in terms of tolerance and response, but clinical guidelines for using these adjuvant treatments are currently lacking. The aim of this review is to present current knowledge concerning the incidence and management of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and current data concerning survival and morbidity after salvage surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana M. Hartl
- Department of Anesthesia, Surgery, and Interventional Radiology, Head and Neck Oncology Service, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Joanne Guerlain
- Department of Anesthesia, Surgery, and Interventional Radiology, Head and Neck Oncology Service, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Philippe Gorphe
- Department of Anesthesia, Surgery, and Interventional Radiology, Head and Neck Oncology Service, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Madan Kapre
- Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, Neeti Clinics Nagpur, Nagpur 440010, India
| | - Neeti Kapre Gupta
- Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, Neeti Clinics Nagpur, Nagpur 440010, India
| | - Nabil F. Saba
- The Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - K. Thomas Robbins
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University Medical School, Springfield, IL 62703, USA
| | - Ohad Ronen
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Galilee Medical Center Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed 5290002, Israel
| | - Juan P. Rodrigo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, IUOPA, ISPA, CIBERONC, 33204 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Primož Strojan
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Antti A. Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Luiz P. Kowalski
- Head and Neck Surgery Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
- Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology Department, A C Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo 01509-001, Brazil
| | - Jatin P. Shah
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35100 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Buciuman N, Marcu LG. Dosimetric and clinical aspects of head and neck cancer reirradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques over the last decade. Phys Med 2023; 112:102650. [PMID: 37556868 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor recurrence in head and neck cancer (HNC) is very common, given that locoregional disease relapse occurs in up to 50% of patients. The clinical approach towards cancer recurrence is either by surgery and/or chemo-radiotherapy. Irrespective of the treatment, the management of HNC recurrence is highly challenging and often administered with palliative intent only. The aim of this work was to analyze clinical and dosimetric aspects, such as dose prescription, organ at risk sparing, overall survival and locoregional control of HNC after reirradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques based on studies published over the last decade, due to the wide clinical implementation of the intensity modulated radiotherapy and particularly of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for this malignancy. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was conducted within Pub-med/Medline databases to find relevant studies. Of the 130 articles fulfilling the initial search criteria, 15 were selected for final analysis that encompassed all set requirements. RESULTS Clinical studies revealed the multitude of factors influencing treatment outcome, including anatomical location, histological tumor type, patient-related factors (smoking / comorbidities), cumulative dose and fractionation schedule, reirradiated volume and time between the irradiation of primary and recurrent tumor. CONCLUSIONS Since the literature reports no specific data related to the type of intensity modulation used in reirradiation or any correlation with treatment outcome, IMRT and VMAT might offer comparable result after HNC reirradiation. Patient selection is potentially the main factor leading to an efficient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolett Buciuman
- Faculty of Physics, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania; OncoHelp Foundation, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Loredana G Marcu
- Faculty of Physics, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania; Faculty of Informatics & Science, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania; UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scolari C, Buchali A, Franzen A, Förster R, Windisch P, Bodis S, Zwahlen DR, Schröder C. Re-irradiation for head and neck cancer: outcome and toxicity analysis using a prospective single institution database. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1175609. [PMID: 37456239 PMCID: PMC10346436 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1175609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Re-irradiation (re-RT) in head and neck cancer is challenging. This study prospectively explored the feasibility of re-RT in patients with loco-regionally recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (LRR/SP HNC). Methods From 2004 to 2021, 61 LRR/SP HNC patients were treated with re-RT, defined as having a second course of RT with curative intent resulting in a cumulative dose of ≥100 Gy in an overlapping volume. Postoperative or definitive dynamic intensity-modulated and/or volumetric modulated re-RT was administered using twice daily hyperfractionation to 60 Gy combined with cisplatin or carboplatin/5-fluorouracil. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC) and distant metastasis control (DMC) were analyzed and prognostic factors evaluated. Toxicity was prospectively recorded and graded. Results The median follow-up was 9.8 months. In 41 patients (67.1%), complete administration of the intended treatment was not feasible. In 9 patients (15%) re-RT was interrupted prematurely and in other 9, the complete re-RT dose was lower than 60 Gy, and 37 patients (61%) could not receive or complete chemotherapy. Two-year OS, PFS and LRC rates were 19%, 18% and 30%, respectively. 20 patients (33%) received the complete intended treatment, and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 70% and 47%, respectively. Charlson comorbidity index was an important predictor for treatment completion. Multivariate analysis revealed recurrent N stage 0-1, age, chemotherapy administration and re-RT dose of 60 Gy as prognostic factors for clinical outcomes. No grade 5 re-RT-related toxicity was observed. The most common new grade ≥3 acute toxicities were dysphagia (52%) and mucositis (46%). Late toxicity included grade ≥3 dysphagia in 5% and osteoradionecrosis in 10% of evaluable patients, respectively. 6 patients (10%) were alive after 9 years without progression and no late toxicity grade ≥3, except for 2 patients presenting with osteoradionecrosis. Conclusion Hyperfractionated re-RT with 60 Gy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy was a curative treatment option with acceptable toxicity in LRR/SP patients. Patients with higher comorbidity had a higher probability of failing to receive and complete the intended therapy. Consequently, they derived unsatisfactory benefits from re-RT, highlighting the importance of patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Scolari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - André Buchali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Achim Franzen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Joint Faculty of the University of Potsdam, Brandenburg university of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg and Brandenburg Medical School, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Robert Förster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Bodis
- Center for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau and Baden (KSA-KSB), Aarau/Baden, Switzerland
| | - Daniel R. Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Christina Schröder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reirradiation for local recurrence of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers: a multi-institutional study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:3062. [PMID: 36810749 PMCID: PMC9944926 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29459-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the efficacy and toxicity of reirradiation in patients with locally recurrent oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers. We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional analysis of 129 patients with previously irradiated cancer. The most frequent primary sites were the nasopharynx (43.4%), oral cavity (24.8%), and oropharynx (18.6%). With a median follow-up duration of 10.6 months, the median overall survival was 14.4 months and the 2-year overall survival rate was 40.6%. For each primary site, the 2-year overall survival rates were 32.1%, 34.6%, 30%, 60.8%, and 5.7% for the hypopharynx, oral cavity, larynx, nasopharynx, and oropharynx, respectively. Prognostic factors for overall survival were primary site (nasopharynx versus other sites) and gross tumor volume (GTV) (≤ 25 cm3 versus > 25 cm3). The 2-year local control rate was 41.2%. Twenty-four patients (18.6%) presented with grade ≥ 3 toxicities, including nine with hemorrhages that led to grade 5 toxicities in seven patients. All nine tumors that caused hemorrhage showed tumor encasement of the carotid ≥ 180 degrees and eight of nine tumors had larger GTV > 25 cm3. Reirradiation is a feasible treatment option for small local recurrence of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers, with the requirement of a strict eligibility assessment for large tumors with carotid encasement.
Collapse
|
14
|
Beddok A, Orlhac F, Calugaru V, Champion L, Ala Eddine C, Nioche C, Créhange G, Buvat I. [18F]-FDG PET and MRI radiomic signatures to predict the risk and the location of tumor recurrence after re-irradiation in head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:559-571. [PMID: 36282298 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06000-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate whether radiomics from [18F]-FDG PET and/or MRI before re-irradiation (reRT) of recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) could predict the occurrence and the location "in-field" or "outside" of a second locoregional recurrence (LR). METHODS Among the 55 patients re-irradiated at curative intend for HNC from 2012 to 2019, 48 had an MRI and/or PET before the start of the reRT. Thirty-nine radiomic features (RF) were extracted from the re-irradiated GTV (rGTV) using LIFEx software. Student t tests and Spearman correlation coefficient were used to select the RF that best separate patients who recurred from those who did not, and "in-field" from "outside" recurrences. Principal component analysis involving these features only was used to create a prediction model. Leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to evaluate the models. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 17 months, 40/55 patients had developed a second LR, including 18 "in-field" and 22 "outside" recurrences. From pre-reRT MRI, a model based on three RF (GLSZM_SZHGLE, GLSZM_LGLZE, and skewness) predicted whether patients would recur with a balanced accuracy (BA) of 83.5%. Another model from pre-reRT MRI based on three other RF (GLSZM_ LZHGE, NGLDM_Busyness, and GLZLM_SZE) predicted whether patients would recur "in-field" or "outside" with a BA of 78.5%. From pre-reRT PET, a model based on four RF (Kurtosis, SUVbwmin, GLCM_Correlation, and GLCM_Contrast) predicted the LR location with a BA of 84.5%. CONCLUSION RF characterizing tumor heterogeneity extracted from pre-reRT PET and MRI predicted whether patients would recur, and whether they would recur "in-field" or "outside".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, U1288, Orsay, France.
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, PSL Research University, 25 rue d'Ulm 75005, Paris/Orsay, France.
| | - Fanny Orlhac
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, U1288, Orsay, France
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, PSL Research University, 25 rue d'Ulm 75005, Paris/Orsay, France
| | - Laurence Champion
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, U1288, Orsay, France
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | - Christophe Nioche
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, U1288, Orsay, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, PSL Research University, 25 rue d'Ulm 75005, Paris/Orsay, France
| | - Irène Buvat
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, U1288, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen YC, Fan KH, Lin CY, Kang CJ, Huang SF, Wang HM, Cheng AJ, Chang JTC. Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed J 2022; 45:940-947. [PMID: 34968771 PMCID: PMC9795343 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To predict the outcome of reirradiation (re-RT) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS Eighty-three patients met the criterion of having previously irradiated OSCC treated via curative intent re-RT for recurrent or new primary OSCC. The exclusion criteria were a suboptimal dose (<45 Gy) for the first RT and palliative intent for the second irradiation. Re-RT was defined as at least 75% volume at second RT after receiving at least 45 Gy at the first RT. RESULTS The 2-year locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 20% and 28%. For LRPFS, four predictors were noted through univariate analyses: performance status (PS) (p = 0.001), a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001), stage IVB (p = 0.020), and surgery before re-RT (p = 0.041). In multivariate analyses, only PS (p = 0.005) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001) remained significant. For OS, PS (p = 0.001) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.042) were still independently associated predictors, but surgery before re-RT became marginally beneficial (p = 0.053). For patients with a poor PS (ECOG = 2-3), the 2-year OS was only 4.5%. Twenty-nine percent of the patients experienced severe late complications (≥Grade 3), and 18% had new episodes of osteoradionecrosis during their follow-up. CONCLUSION We identified PS and a re-RT dose ≥60 Gy as predictors for LRPFS and OS. Surgery before re-RT might improve OS. However, the treatment results of re-RT for OSCC were suboptimal. Prospective trials using modern RT techniques, in combination with new therapeutic drugs or radioenhancers, are warranted for improving these dismal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Chao Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Hsing Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan,Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at LinKou, Taoyuan, Taiwan,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at LinKou, Taoyuan, Taiwan,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Jan Kang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at LinKou, Taoyuan, Taiwan,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shiang-Fu Huang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at LinKou, Taoyuan, Taiwan,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Ming Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at LinKou, Taoyuan, Taiwan,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ann-Joy Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at LinKou, Taoyuan, Taiwan,Department of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at LinKou, Taoyuan, Taiwan,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan,Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, 5, Fusing St., Gueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bhattacharyya T, Koto M, Windisch P, Ikawa H, Hagiwara Y, Tsuji H, Adeberg S. Emerging Role of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Reirradiation of Recurrent Head and Neck Cancers: What Have We Achieved So Far? Front Oncol 2022; 12:888446. [PMID: 35677171 PMCID: PMC9167994 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.888446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Administering reirradiation for the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancers is extremely challenging. These tumors are hypoxic and radioresistant and require escalated radiation doses for adequate control. The obstacle to delivering this escalated dose of radiation to the target is its proximity to critical organs at risk (OARs) and possible development of consequent severe late toxicities. With the emergence of highly sophisticated technologies, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy have shown promising outcomes. Proton beam radiotherapy has been used for locally recurrent head and neck cancers because of its excellent physical dose distribution, exploring sharp Bragg peak properties with negligible entrance and exit doses. To further improve these results, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has been explored in several countries across Europe and Asia because of its favorable physical properties with minimal entrance and exit doses, sharper lateral penumbra, and much higher and variable relative biological efficacy, which cannot be currently achieved with any other form of radiation. Few studies have described the role of CIRT in recurrent head and neck cancers. In this article, we have discussed the different aspects of carbon ions in reirradiation of recurrent head and neck cancers, including European and Asian experiences, different dose schedules, dose constraints of OARs, outcomes, and toxicities, and a brief comparison with proton beam radiotherapy and IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tapesh Bhattacharyya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masashi Koto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Hiroaki Ikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhito Hagiwara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhao L, Day AT, Moon D, Avkshtol V, Sumer BD, Hughes R, Sher DJ. Survival and disease progression following solitary locoregional recurrence after head and neck radiotherapy. Head Neck 2022; 44:1153-1163. [PMID: 35212070 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The management of solitary locoregional recurrence (sLRR) of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) previously treated with radiotherapy (RT) is challenging. We aimed to identify characteristics associated with improved outcome. METHODS We identified patients treated with non-sinus, mucosal HNSCC who initially received IMRT. We characterized overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC). Multivariable analysis (MVA) on survival and patterns-of-failure were performed using Cox and Fine-Gray competing risks analysis. RESULTS We identified 90 patients with available follow-up. In total, 67 (74%) patients received curative-intent salvage, while 23 (26%) received palliative care. On MVA, significantly improved OS and LRC were associated with lower initial N-classification and use of salvage total laryngectomy (TL) or neck dissection (ND). CONCLUSION A nontrivial number of patients with sLRR cannot undergo salvage. Among patients treated with curative intent, TL or ND were clearly associated with improved OS and LRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucian Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew T Day
- Department of Otolaryngology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Dominic Moon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Vladimir Avkshtol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Baran D Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Randall Hughes
- Department of Medical Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - David J Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ward MC, Koyfman SA, Bakst RL, Margalit DN, Beadle BM, Beitler JJ, Chang SSW, Cooper JS, Galloway TJ, Ridge JA, Robbins JR, Sacco AG, Tsai CJ, Yom SS, Siddiqui F. Retreatment of Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Radiation: Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC): Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:759-786. [PMID: 35398456 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Re-treatment of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers occurring in a previously irradiated field is complex. Few guidelines exist to support practice. METHODS We performed an updated literature search of peer-reviewed journals in a systematic fashion. Search terms, key questions, and associated clinical case variants were formed by panel consensus. The literature search informed the committee during a blinded vote on the appropriateness of treatment options via the modified Delphi method. RESULTS The final number of citations retained for review was 274. These informed five key questions, which focused on patient selection, adjuvant re-irradiation, definitive re-irradiation, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT), and re-irradiation to treat non-squamous cancer. Results of the consensus voting are presented along with discussion of the most current evidence. CONCLUSIONS This provides updated evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for the re-treatment of recurrent or second primary cancer of the head and neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Ward
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina.
| | | | | | - Danielle N Margalit
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beth M Beadle
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | | | | | | | | | - John A Ridge
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jared R Robbins
- University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Assuntina G Sacco
- University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - C Jillian Tsai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Beddok A, Calugaru V, de Marzi L, Graff P, Dumas JL, Goudjil F, Dendale R, Minsat M, Verrelle P, Buvat I, Créhange G. Clinical and technical challenges of cancer reirradiation: Words of wisdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 174:103655. [PMID: 35398521 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the development of new radiotherapy techniques that have improved healthy tissue sparing, reirradiation (reRT) has become possible. The selection of patients eligible for reRT is complex given that it can induce severe or even fatal side effects. The first step should therefore be to assess, in the context of multidisciplinary staff meeting, the patient's physical status, the presence of sequelae resulting from the first irradiation and the best treatment option available. ReRT can be performed either curatively or palliatively to treat a cancer-related symptom that is detrimental to the patient's quality of life. The selected techniques for reRT should provide the best protection of healthy tissue. The construction of target volumes and the evaluation of constraints regarding the doses that can be used in this context have not yet been fully codified. These points raised in the literature suggest that randomized studies should be undertaken to answer pending questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France.
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Jean-Luc Dumas
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Mathieu Minsat
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Irène Buvat
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Barz M, Bette S, Janssen I, Aftahy AK, Huber T, Liesche-Starnecker F, Ryang YM, Wiestler B, Combs SE, Meyer B, Gempt J. Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index in recurrent glioblastoma: a new prognostic factor? BMC Neurol 2022; 22:32. [PMID: 35062885 PMCID: PMC8780246 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02532-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
For recurrent glioblastoma (GB) patients, several therapy options have been established over the last years such as more aggressive surgery, re-irradiation or chemotherapy. Age and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS) are used to make decisions for these patients as these are established as prognostic factors in the initial diagnosis of GB. This study’s aim was to evaluate preoperative patient comorbidities by using the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) as a prognostic factor for recurrent GB patients.
Methods
In this retrospective analysis we could include 123 patients with surgery for primary recurrence of GB from January 2007 until December 2016 (43 females, 80 males, mean age 57 years (range 21–80 years)). Preoperative age, sex, ACCI, KPSS and adjuvant treatment regimes were recorded for each patient. Extent of resection (EOR) was recorded as a complete/incomplete resection of the contrast-enhancing tumor part.
Results
Median overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.1–10.9 months) after first re-resection. Preoperative KPSS > 80% (P < 0.001) and EOR (P = 0.013) were associated with significantly improved survival in univariate analysis. Including these factors in multivariate analysis, preoperative KPSS < 80 (HR 2.002 [95% CI: 1.246–3.216], P = 0.004) and EOR are the only significant prognostic factor (HR 1.611 [95% CI: 1.036–2.505], P = 0.034). ACCI was not shown as a prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Conclusion
For patients with surgery for recurrent glioblastoma, the ACCI does not add further information about patient’s prognosis besides the well-established KPSS and extent of resection.
Collapse
|
21
|
Re-Irradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: Cumulative Dose to Organs at Risk and Late Side Effects. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133173. [PMID: 34202135 PMCID: PMC8269009 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Local recurrences of head and neck cancer are unfortunately common and can be difficult to treat. The treatment is challenging, partly due to the location, with several important organs in the head and neck area, but also because recurrence often occurs in an area already treated with radiotherapy. It has been shown that repeat radiotherapy, re-irradiation, can offer long-lasting tumor control and sometimes even cure in selected patients. However, there is a risk of normal tissue close to the tumor being damaged by high cumulative doses of radiotherapy. In this study, we aim to establish levels of cumulative dose to specific organs that could be considered reasonably safe to deliver at re-irradiation without causing high rates of severe side effects. Increased knowledge in dose–response relationships in re-irradiation for head and neck cancer will facilitate a tailored treatment for the individual patient. Abstract Re-irradiation in head and neck cancer is challenging, and cumulative dose constraints and dose/volume data are scarce. In this study, we present dose/volume data for patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer and explore the correlations of cumulative dose to organs at risk and severe side effects. We analyzed 54 patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer between 2011 and 2017. Organs at risk were delineated and dose/volume data were collected from cumulative treatment plans of all included patients. Receiver–operator characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed the association between dose/volume parameters and the risk of toxicity. The ROC-curve for a logistic model of carotid blowout vs. maximum doses to the carotid arteries showed AUC = 0.92 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.89). The near-maximum dose to bones showed an association with the risk of osteoradionecrosis: AUC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.95) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.52). Our analysis showed an association between cumulative dose to organs at risk and the risk of developing osteoradionecrosis and carotid blowout, and our results support the existing dose constraint for the carotid arteries of 120 Gy. The confirmation of these dose–response relationships will contribute to further improvements of re-irradiation strategies.
Collapse
|
22
|
Altay-Langguth A, Balermpas P, Brandts C, Balster S, Ghanaati S, Winkelmann R, Burck I, Rödel F, Martin D, Rödel C, von der Grün J. Re-irradiation with concurrent and maintenance nivolumab in locally recurrent and inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A single-center cohort study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 28:71-78. [PMID: 33889760 PMCID: PMC8050105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Combination of in-field ReRT and nivolumab for locally recurrent HNSCC is feasible. No unexpected radiation-related toxicity occurred. CRP-, hemoglobin-levels, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were associated with LPFS.
Background The rate of loco-regional recurrences for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) following standard treatment reaches up to 50%, accompanied by a probability of 20% to develop a second primary tumor in the head and neck region. Methods Ten patients with inoperable, in-field recurrence of HNSCC following previous primary or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in combination with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy were re-irradiated with 60 Gray in 30 fractions between December 2017 and January 2020 with concurrent and maintenance nivolumab administration. Data were retrospectively collected and compared with patients who underwent re-irradiation (ReRT) with concurrent cisplatin following propensity score matching (PSM). Local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) were visualized using Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test). Results All patients completed ReRT. Median number of applied courses of nivolumab was 12 (range, 3–38). OS rate was 50% at 12 months and the median OS was 11 (range, 2–23) months. Six and 12 month LPFS rates were 60% and 30%, respectively. Median LPFS was 8 (range, 2–19) months. OS and LPFS rates were not inferior to those of patients treated with concurrent cisplatin. No unexpected radiation-related toxicity occurred. A total of four patients developed any-grade immune-related adverse events of which two presented with grade 3 toxicities. One patient died within 3 weeks after ReRT. Higher blood levels of CRP (p = 0.004), lower levels of hemoglobin (p = 0.029) and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.004) were associated with impaired LPFS. Higher recursive portioning analysis (RPA) class was associated with impaired LPFS (p = 0.022) and OS (p = 0.024). Conclusion The combination of ReRT and nivolumab for locally recurrent HNSCC was feasible without occurrence of unexpected toxicities. Combined radioimmunotherapy might offer an effective treatment option for carefully selected pre-irradiated patients ineligible for salvage surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alev Altay-Langguth
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Brandts
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main/Mainz, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sven Balster
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Shahram Ghanaati
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ria Winkelmann
- Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Iris Burck
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Franz Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main/Mainz, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Daniel Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main/Mainz, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main/Mainz, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt am Main/Mainz, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Corresponding author at: Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Locatello LG, Mastronicola R, Cortese S, Beulque E, Salleron J, Gallo O, Dolivet G. Estimating the risks and benefits before salvage surgery for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1718-1726. [PMID: 33549376 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The risks associated with salvage surgery of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in a previously irradiated field needs to be balanced against the expected survival benefits. We want to identify preoperative predictive factors for overall and disease-specific survival (OS/DSS) and for the development of serious (Clavien-Dindo, CD≥III) complications following salvage surgery for radiorecurrent SCC to help surgeons, patients, and caregivers in the decision-making process in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS The records of 234 patients presenting to the Lorraine Cancer Institute with locoregional radiorecurrent SCC were reviewed. The primary endpoint was OS, secondary endpoints were DSS, OS without tracheostomy/gastrostomy, and the risk of CD≥III complications. Multivariate analyses were carried out to explore preoperative factors associated with survival and the risk of postoperative complications. RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 19 months, 5-year OS since the first salvage surgery was 28.3%, 5-year DSS was 38.9%. 2- and 5-year functional OS were 45.6% and 27.2%. rcT-rcN, and WUNHCI ≥4 were both independent significant preoperative predictors of OS and DSS. 30-days postoperative complications occurred in 44.4% of patients (28 CD I, 24 CD II, 34 CD III, 11 CD IV, 7 CD V). A salvage procedure involving T+N plus the presence of a WUHNCI ≥4 was the only independent predictor of CD≥III complications. CONCLUSION When discussing with the patients and the caregivers salvage surgery for recurrent head and neck SCC, a careful evaluation of the preoperative comorbidities by the WUHNCI tool can reliably predict the expected risks and benefits from the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Giovanni Locatello
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Head and Neck Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, F-54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla, 3 - 50134, Florence, Italy.
| | - Romina Mastronicola
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Head and Neck Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, F-54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; University of Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Sophie Cortese
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Head and Neck Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, F-54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Emilie Beulque
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Head and Neck Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, F-54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Biostatistics Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, F-54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Oreste Gallo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla, 3 - 50134, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gilles Dolivet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Head and Neck Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, F-54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; University of Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, F-54000, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Huang RD, Sun Z, Wang XH, Tian YM, Peng YL, Wang JY, Xiao WW, Chen CY, Deng XW, Han F. Development of a Comorbidity-Based Nomogram to Predict Survival After Salvage Reirradiation of Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era. Front Oncol 2021; 10:625184. [PMID: 33552995 PMCID: PMC7855849 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.625184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the impact of comorbidity on treatment outcomes in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (lrNPC) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to develop a nomogram that combines prognostic factors to predict clinical outcome and guide individual treatment. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of patients with lrNPC who were reirradiated with IMRT between 2003 and 2014. Comorbidity was evaluated by Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 grading (ACE-27). The significant prognostic factors (P < 0.05) by multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model were adopted into the nomogram model. Harrell concordance index (C-index) calibration curves were applied to assess this model. Results Between 2003 and 2014, 469 lrNPC patients treated in our institution were enrolled. Significant comorbidity (moderate or severe grade) was present in 17.1% of patients by ACE-27. Patients with no or mild comorbidity had a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 36.2 versus 20.0% among those with comorbidity of moderate or severe grade (P < 0.0001). The chemotherapy used was not significantly different in patients with lrNPC (P > 0.05). For the rT3-4 patients, the 5-year OS rate in the chemotherapy + radiation therapy (RT) group was 30.0 versus 16.7% for RT only (P = 0.005). The rT3-4 patients with no or mild comorbidity were associated with a higher 5-year OS rate in the chemotherapy + RT group than in the RT only group (32.1 and 17.1%, respectively; P=0.003). However, for the rT3-4 patients with a comorbidity (moderate or severe grade), the 5-year OS rate in the chemotherapy + RT group vs. RT alone was not significantly different (15.7 vs. 15.0%, respectively; p > 0.05). Eight independent prognostic factors identified from multivariable analysis were fitted into a nomogram, including comorbidity. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.715. The area under curves (AUCs) for the prediction of 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival were 0.770, 0.764, and 0.780, respectively. Conclusion Comorbidity is among eight important prognostic factors for patients undergoing reirradiation. We developed a nomogram for lrNPC patients to predict the probability of death after reirradiation and guide individualized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Run-Da Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuang Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Hui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yun-Ming Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hui Zhou Municipal Centre Hospital, Huizhou, China
| | - Ying-Lin Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing-Yun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Wei Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chun-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Wu Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fei Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Prabhash K, Babu G, Chaturvedi P, Kuriakose M, Birur P, Anand AK, Kaushal A, Mahajan A, Syiemlieh J, Singhal M, Gairola M, Ramachandra P, Goyal S, John S, Nayyar R, Patil VM, Rao V, Roshan V, K RG. Indian clinical practice consensus guidelines for the management of very advanced disease of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Indian J Cancer 2020; 57:S22-S25. [PMID: 32167069 DOI: 10.4103/0019-509x.278977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Govind Babu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Pankaj Chaturvedi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Moni Kuriakose
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cochin Cancer Research Centre, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Praveen Birur
- Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, KLE Society's Institute of Dental Sciences (KLESIDS), Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Anil K Anand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Kaushal
- Department of Medical Oncology, HCG Cancer Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Abhishek Mahajan
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Judita Syiemlieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Civil Hospital, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
| | - Manish Singhal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Munish Gairola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi, India
| | - Prakash Ramachandra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Sumit Goyal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi, India
| | - Subashini John
- Department of Radiotherapy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Rohit Nayyar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Vijay M Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vishal Rao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, HCG Cancer Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Vikas Roshan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| | - Rath G K
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Svajdova M, Dubinsky P, Kazda T. Radical external beam re-irradiation in the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer: Critical review. Head Neck 2020; 43:354-366. [PMID: 32996265 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Management of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer remains a challenge for the surgeon as well as the treating radiation oncologist. Even in the era of modern radiotherapy, the rate of severe toxicity remains high with unsatisfactory treatment results. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and heavy-ion irradiation have all emerged as highly conformal and precise techniques that offer many radiobiological advantages in various clinical situations. Although re-irradiation is now widespread in clinical practice, little is known about the differences in treatment response and toxicity using diverse re-irradiation techniques. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the role of radiation therapy in recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer including patient selection, therapeutic outcome, and risk using different re-irradiation techniques. Critical review of published evidence on IMRT, SBRT, and heavy-ion full-dose re-irradiation is presented including data on locoregional control, overall survival, and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Svajdova
- Clinic of Radiation and Clinical Oncology, Central Military Hospital-Teaching Hospital Ruzomberok, Slovakia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pavol Dubinsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, East Slovakia Oncology Institute, Kosice, Slovakia.,Faculty of Health, Catholic University, Ruzomberok, Slovakia
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.,Research Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gogineni E, Rana Z, Wotman M, Karten J, Riegel A, Marrero M, Maduro L, Kamdar D, Frank D, Paul D, Seetharamu N, Ghaly M. Impact of stereotactic body radiation therapy on geriatric assessment and management for older patients with head and neck cancer using G8. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 12:122-127. [PMID: 32593669 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Management of head and neck cancers (HNC) in older adults is a common but challenging clinical scenario. We assess the impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) on survival utilizing the Geriatric-8 (G8) questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS 171 HNC patients, deemed medically unfit for definitive treatment, were treated with SBRT ± systemic therapy. G8 questionnaires were collected at baseline, at 4-6 weeks, and at 2-3 months post-treatment. Patients were stratified according to their baseline G8 score: <11 as 'vulnerable', 11-14 as 'intermediate', and >14 as 'fit'. Overall survival (OS) was assessed through univariate Kaplan Meier analysis. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine if baseline characteristics affected G8 score changes. RESULTS Median follow-up was seventeen months. 60% of patients presented with recurrent HNC, 30% with untreated HNC primaries, and 10% with metastatic non-HNC primaries. Median age was 75 years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 2. 51% of patients were 'vulnerable', 37% were 'intermediate', and 12% were 'fit' at baseline, with median survival of 13.2, 24.3, and 41.0 months, respectively (p = .004). Patients who saw a decrease in their follow-up G8 score (n = 69) had significantly lower survival than patients who had stable or increased follow-up G8 scores (n = 102), with median survival of 8.6 vs 36.0 months (p < .001). CONCLUSION The G8 questionnaire may be a useful tool in upfront treatment decision-making to predict prognosis and prevent older patients from receiving inappropriate anti-cancer treatment. Decline in follow-up G8 scores may also predict worse survival and aid in goals of care following treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Zaker Rana
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Michael Wotman
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Jessie Karten
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Adam Riegel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Mihaela Marrero
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Luis Maduro
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Dev Kamdar
- Department of Otolarygology, Head / Neck Surgery, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Douglas Frank
- Department of Otolarygology, Head / Neck Surgery, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Doru Paul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | | | - Maged Ghaly
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Embring A, Onjukka E, Mercke C, Lax I, Berglund A, Bornedal S, Wennberg B, Friesland S. Overlapping volumes in re-irradiation for head and neck cancer - an important factor for patient selection. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:147. [PMID: 32513217 PMCID: PMC7278185 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01587-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of consensus concerning the definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes in head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of the present study is to introduce a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume that might better predict the risk of serious side-effects from treatment. METHODS Fifty-four consecutive patients re-irradiated for HNC cancer were retrospectively analysed. CT images were deformably registered and the dose distributions accumulated after conversion to EQD2. Patients with a cumulative dose of ≥100 Gy in the overlapping volume (V100) were included in the study. Survival data and radiation-related acute and late toxicities were recorded. RESULTS The overall survival of all included patients at 2 and 5 years was 42.6 and 27.3% respectively and the progression free survival at 2 and 5 years was 32.5 and 28.5% respectively. The overall rate of any event of severe (grade ≥ 3) acute and late toxicity was 26 and 51%, respectively. We found that severe acute toxicity was more common in patients who had a larger overlapping volume (V100 > mean) where 43% of the patients experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity, compared to the patients with smaller overlapping volumes (V100 < mean) where only 11% had severe toxicity (p = 0.02). The seemingly high rates of late toxicity in the present study could be due to the use of a more strict definition of re-irradiation. In previous studies also patients with low dose overlap are included and our results imply that there is a risk that previous studies might have overestimated the risk-benefit ratio in re-irradiation of HNC. CONCLUSIONS Our study describes the outcome of a patient material where a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume is used. With this definition, which could better describe the volume of highest risk for serious complications, we found that larger such overlapping volumes result in an increase in severe acute side-effects. A clear definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes is of utmost importance for future studies of HNC to make results from different studies comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Embring
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Anna Steckséns gata 41, 171 76, Stockholm, Solna, Sweden. .,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Eva Onjukka
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Claes Mercke
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Anna Steckséns gata 41, 171 76, Stockholm, Solna, Sweden.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Lax
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Berglund
- Epistat Epidemiology and Statistics Consulting, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sara Bornedal
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Berit Wennberg
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Signe Friesland
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Anna Steckséns gata 41, 171 76, Stockholm, Solna, Sweden.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Boustani J, Ruffier A, Moya-Plana A, Tao Y, Nguyen F, Even C, Berthold C, Casiraghi O, Temam S, Blanchard P. Long-term outcomes and safety after reirradiation in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:188-197. [PMID: 32514613 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01647-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine outcomes and toxicities after reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) and to apply a prognostic index in a non-endemic region. METHODS We retrospectively reported progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities in patients treated with curative intent for locally rNPC. We applied the prognostic model for OS and grade 5 radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicities published by Li et al. and evaluated its prognostic accuracy by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2018, 33 patients were treated for rNPC in our institution. Median follow-up was 60 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 75 months. Six (18%) patients had a persistent grade 3 toxicity from a previous RT course. The median re-RT dose was 66 Gy. After re-RT, 13 patients had local failure and 3 patients had metastatic recurrence. Median PFS was 18 months with a 5-year PFS rate of 29%. Median OS was 35 months with a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Grade 3 or higher toxicities rate was 74%. There were 21% grade 5 toxicities. The median time to a grade 5 toxicity was less than 6 months following re-RT. The prognostic nomogram was not predictive for OS or grade 5 toxicities. CONCLUSION Reirradiation of rNPC is an effective treatment but is associated with a high rate of life-threatening toxicity. Stratification of patients based on their risk of developing severe toxicity is needed to select patients who will most likely benefit from re-RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France.
| | - A Ruffier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - A Moya-Plana
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Y Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - F Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - C Even
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C Berthold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - O Casiraghi
- Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Temam
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - P Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Foster CC, Fan M, Lee NY, Yom SS, Heaton CM, Deraniyagala R, Amdur R, Weichselbaum RR, Haraf DJ. Is It Worth It? Consequences of Definitive Head and Neck Reirradiation. Semin Radiat Oncol 2020; 30:212-217. [PMID: 32503785 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Locally recurrent head and neck malignancies after definitive radiation or chemoradiation represent challenging clinical scenarios requiring careful consideration of individualized risks and benefits before deciding upon the next best course of therapy. Herein, a case-based approach to personalized decision making highlights the expert opinions of leaders in head and neck oncology. Topics of interest include optimal candidacy for reirradiation or salvage surgical resection, the judicious use of chemotherapy as induction therapy or as a radiosensitizing agent, the incorporation of immunotherapy into the treatment paradigm for locally recurrent disease, and the impact of various treatment modalities on quality of life and functional outcomes. Interestingly, the lack of consensus among the experts on topics as fundamental as the appropriateness of offering reirradiation at all and as nuanced as target volume delineation for the reirradiated field suggests that there is no straightforward approach in this scenario. Common to all opinions is a desire to maximize the therapeutic ratio for a patient potentially facing a grim prognosis, and honest discussions about goals of care and expectations for post-treatment quality of life should be central to the clinical approach to this and similar cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey C Foster
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Ming Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cancer, New York, NY
| | - Sue S Yom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Chase M Heaton
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rohan Deraniyagala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI
| | - Robert Amdur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Hospitals, Gainesville, FL
| | - Ralph R Weichselbaum
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Daniel J Haraf
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Predictors of survival in patients undergoing oropharyngeal surgery for cancer recurrence after radiation therapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277:2085-2093. [PMID: 32193723 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05913-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma continues to rise with the majority of patients receiving definitive or adjunctive radiation. For patients with locoregional recurrence after radiation, optimal treatment involves salvage surgery. The aim of this study is to identify factors that predict survival to ultimately improve patient selection for salvage surgery. METHODS Retrospective cohort study at an NCI-designated cancer center. We analyzed patients with a history of head and neck radiation who presented with persistent/recurrent or second primary disease requiring salvage oropharyngeal resection from 1998-2017 (n = 120). Patients were stratified into three classes based on time to recurrence and presence of laryngopharyngeal dysfunction. Primary outcomes were 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS). RESULTS Median OS was 27 months (median follow-up 20 months). Five-year OS was 47% for class I (recurrence > 2 years), 26% for class II (recurrence ≤ 2 years), and 0% for class III (recurrence ≤ 2 years and laryngopharyngeal dysfunction), (p < 0.0001). Five-year DSS showed significant differences between classes (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, class remained predictive of OS (p = 0.04- < 0.001) and DSS (p = 0.04-0.001). Adjuvant radiation after salvage surgery with negative margins showed superior OS (71% vs. 28%, p = 0.01) and DSS (83% vs 37%, p = 0.02) compared to surgery alone and was a significant predictor of improved survival on multivariate analysis (HR 0.1, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION This study identified a subset of patients with oropharyngeal cancer recurrence within two years of initial treatment and with laryngopharyngeal dysfunction who have poor outcomes for salvage surgery.
Collapse
|
32
|
Fan D, Kang JJ, Fan M, Wang H, Lee A, Yu Y, Chen L, Jillian Tsai C, McBride SM, Riaz N, Gelblum DY, Neal BP, Fetten J, Dunn LA, Michel LS, Boyle JO, Cohen MA, Roman BR, Ganly I, Singh B, Wong RJ, Sherman EJ, Lee NY. Last-line local treatment with the Quad Shot regimen for previously irradiated head and neck cancers. Oral Oncol 2020; 104:104641. [PMID: 32182548 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with prior irradiated head and neck cancer (HNC) who are ineligible for definitive retreatment have limited local palliative options. We report the largest series of the use of the Quad Shot (QS) regimen as a last-line local palliative therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 166 patients with prior HN radiation therapy (RT) treated with QS regimen (3.7 Gy twice daily over 2 consecutive days at 4 weeks intervals per cycle, up to 4 cycles). Palliative response defined by symptom(s) relief or radiographic tumor reduction, locoregional progression free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS) and radiation-related toxicity were assessed. RESULTS Median age was 66 years. Median follow-up for all patients was 6.0 months and 9.7 months for living patients. Overall palliative response rate was 66% and symptoms improved in 60% of all patients. Predictors of palliative response were > 2 year interval from prior RT and 3-4 QS cycles. Median LPFS was 5.1 months with 1-year LPFS 17.7%, and median OS was 6.4 months with 1-year OS 25.3%. On multivariate analysis, proton RT, KPS > 70, presence of palliative response and 3-4 QS cycles were associated with improved LPFS and improved OS. The overall Grade 3 toxicity rate was 10.8% (n = 18). No Grade 4-5 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION Palliative QS is an effective last-line local therapy with minimal toxicity in patients with previously irradiated HNC. The administration of 3-4 QS cycles predicts palliative response, improved PFS, and improved OS. KPS > 70 and proton therapy are associated with survival improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jung J Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ming Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Huili Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - C Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean M McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daphna Y Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian P Neal
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - James Fetten
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lara A Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Loren S Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jay O Boyle
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin R Roman
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pipkorn P, Licata J, Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF. Association of Symptoms and Clinical Findings With Anticipated Outcomes in Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 144:738-745. [PMID: 30003215 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Despite advances in treatment over the last decades, recurrent head and neck cancer continues to have a poor prognosis. Prognostic accuracy may help in patient counseling. Objective To explore whether symptoms and clinical variables can predict prognosis in the setting of recurrent head and neck cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants In this retrospective cohort study, patients treated for head and neck cancer with curative intent at Siteman Cancer Center in St Louis, Missouri (a tertiary cancer center) between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014, were reviewed. The dates of data analysis were October 2016 to June 2017. Patients who developed a recurrent cancer were included, with 196 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Main Outcomes and Measures Symptoms and clinical findings at presentation of recurrence were recorded. Sequential sequestration and conjunctive consolidation (2 multivariable techniques) were used to create a composite staging system to predict 1-year overall survival (OS). Results Among 196 patients (mean [SD] age, 61 [11] years; 166 [84.7%] of white race/ethnicity; 76.5% male), 1-year OS was 58.2% (114 of 196 patients). Time to recurrence, symptom severity stage, and rTNM stage were consolidated into a 3-category Clinical Severity Staging System, with 1-year OS rates of 90.2% (95% CI, 82.7%-97.6%) for the 61 patients classified as A, 58.1% (95% CI, 47.7%-68.6%) for the 86 patients classified as B, and 18.4% (95% CI, 7.5%-29.2%) for the 49 patients classified as C. The discriminative power of the new composite staging was better than that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification (C = 0.79 vs C = 0.66). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that clinical variables are associated with anticipated outcomes in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jordan Licata
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Dorina Kallogjeri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jay F Piccirillo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.,Editor
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Orlandi E, Bonomo P, Ferella L, D'Angelo E, Maddalo M, Alterio D, Infante G, Bacigalupo A, Argenone A, Iacovelli NA, Desideri I, Meduri B, Triggiani L, Volpe S, Belgioia L, Dionisi F, Romanello DA, Fallai C, Miceli R. Long-term outcome of re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer: A multi-institutional study of AIRO-Head and Neck working group. Head Neck 2019; 41:3684-3692. [PMID: 31355972 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To report the long-term outcome of patients undergoing re-irradiation (re-RT) for a recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (RSPHNCs) in seven Italian tertiary centers, while testing the Multi-Institution Reirradation (MIRI) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) recently published. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) selected by a random forest model were included in a multivariable Cox analysis. To externally validate MIRI RPA, we estimated the Kaplan-Meier group-stratified OS curves for the whole population. RESULTS Five-year OS was 43.5% (median follow-up: 49.9 months). Nasopharyngeal site, no organ dysfunction, and re-RT volume <36 cm3 were independent factors for better OS. By applying the MIRI RPA to our cohort, a Harrell C-Index of 0.526 was found indicating poor discriminative ability. CONCLUSION Our data reinforce the survival benefit of Re-RT for selected patients with RSPHNC. MIRI RPA was not validated in our population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Orlandi
- Radiotherapy 1 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Radiotherapy 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Letizia Ferella
- Radiotherapy 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa D'Angelo
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Marta Maddalo
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia-Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Infante
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Angela Argenone
- Radiation Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori-Fondazione "GPascale", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia-Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Liliana Belgioia
- Radiation Oncology Department, San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy
- Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genoa, San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Domenico Attilio Romanello
- Radiotherapy 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Fallai
- Radiotherapy 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosalba Miceli
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Alterio D, Marvaso G, Ferrari A, Volpe S, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:233-245. [PMID: 31378376 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) plays a key role in curative-intent treatments for head and neck cancers. Its use is indicated as a sole therapy in early stage tumors or in combination with surgery or concurrent chemotherapy in advanced stages. Recent technologic advances have resulted in both improved oncologic results and expansion of the indications for RT in clinical practice. Despite this, RT administered to the head and neck region is still burdened by a high rate of acute and late side effects. Moreover, about 50% of patients with high-risk disease experience loco-regional recurrence within 3 years of follow-up. Therefore, in recent decades, efforts have been dedicated to optimize the cost/benefit ratio of RT in this subset of patients. The aim of the present review was to highlight modern concepts of RT for head and neck cancers considering both the technological advances that have been achieved and recent knowledge that has informed the biological interaction between radiation and both tumor and healthy tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Annamaria Ferrari
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Single institution implementation of permanent 131Cs interstitial brachytherapy for previously irradiated patients with resectable recurrent head and neck carcinoma. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:227-234. [PMID: 31435429 PMCID: PMC6701381 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.85778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Permanent interstitial brachytherapy is an appealing treatment modality for patients with locoregional recurrent, resectable head and neck carcinoma (HNC), having previously received radiation. Cesium-131 (131Cs) is a permanent implant brachytherapy isotope, with a low average photon energy of 30 keV and a short half-life of 9.7 days. Exposure to medical staff and family members is low; patient isolation and patient room shielding are not required. This work presents a single institution’s implementation process of utilizing an intraoperative, permanent 131Cs implant for patients with completely resected recurrent HNC. Material and methods Fifteen patients receiving 131Cs permanent seed brachytherapy were included in this analysis. The process of pre-planning, selecting the dose prescription, seed ordering, intraoperative procedures, post-implant planning, and radiation safety protocols are described. Results Tumor volumes were contoured on the available preoperative PET/CT scans and a pre-implant treatment plan was created using uniform source strength and uniform 1 cm seed spacing. Implants were performed intraoperatively, following tumor resection. In five of the fifteen cases, intraoperative findings necessitated a change from the planned number of seeds and recalculation of the pre-implant plan. The average prescription dose was 56.1 ±6.6 Gy (range, 40-60 Gy). The average seed strength used was 2.2 ±0.2 U (3.5 ±0.3 mCi). Patients returned to a recovery room on a standard surgical floor and remained inpatients, without radiation safety restrictions, based on standard surgical recovery protocols. A post-implant treatment plan was generated based on immediate post-operative CT imaging to verify the seed distribution and confirm delivery of the prescription dose. Patients were provided educational information regarding radiation safety recommendations. Conclusions Cesium-131 interstitial brachytherapy is feasible and does not pose major radiation safety concerns; it should be considered as a treatment option for previously irradiated patients with recurrent, resectable HNC.
Collapse
|
37
|
Prognostic and predictive factors in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 137:84-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
38
|
Tham T, Machado R, Herman SW, Kraus D, Costantino P, Roche A. Personalized prognostication in head and neck cancer: A systematic review of nomograms according to the AJCC precision medicine core (PMC) criteria. Head Neck 2019; 41:2811-2822. [PMID: 31012188 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Precision Medicine Core (PMC) has recognized the need for more personalized probabilistic predictions above the "TNM" staging system and has recently released a checklist of inclusion and exclusion criteria for evaluating prognostic models. METHODS A systematic review of articles in which nomograms were created for head and neck cancer (HNC) was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The AJCC PMC criteria were used to score the individual studies. RESULTS Forty-four studies were included in the final qualitative analysis. The mean number of inclusion criteria met was 9.3 out of 13, and the mean number of exclusion criteria met was 2.1 out of 3. Studies were generally of high quality, but no single study fulfilled all of the AJCC PMC criteria. CONCLUSION This is the first study to utilize the AJCC checklist to comprehensively evaluate the published prognostic nomograms in HNC. Future studies should attempt to adhere to the AJCC PMC criteria. Recommendations for future research are given. SUMMARY The AJCC recently released a set of criteria to grade the quality of prognostic cancer models. In this study, we grade all published nomograms for head and neck cancer according to the new guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan Tham
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, East Garden City, New York
| | - Rosalie Machado
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, East Garden City, New York
| | - Saori Wendy Herman
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, East Garden City, New York
| | - Dennis Kraus
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, East Garden City, New York
| | - Peter Costantino
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, East Garden City, New York
| | - Ansley Roche
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, East Garden City, New York
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
A competing risk nomogram to predict severe late toxicity after modern re-irradiation for squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol 2019; 90:80-86. [PMID: 30846182 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Severe late toxicity is common after re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary (RSP) squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. However, many patients experience complications from tumor progression before manifesting late effects. We constructed a nomogram to examine this relationship between late toxicity and competing risks. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with RSP squamous carcinoma originating in a field previously irradiated to ≥40 Gy and treated with IMRT-based re-irradiation to ≥40 Gy were collected. Grade ≥3 late toxicity developing ≥90 days after re-irradiation was collected. A multivariable competing-risk model was fit to the actuarial risk of late toxicity with progression or death as the competing risk. The final bootstrap optimized model was converted into a nomogram. RESULTS From 9 institutions, 505 patients were included. The 2-year incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity was 16.7% (95% CI 13.2-20.2%) whereas progression or death was 64.2% (95% CI 59.7-68.8%). The median freedom from late toxicity, progression or death was 10.7, 5.5 and 3.2 months for RPA class I-III patients respectively, whereas the median OS was 44.9, 15.9 and 7.9 months, respectively. The final model included six clinical factors. Notably, dose, volume and fractionation did not significantly impact toxicity. CONCLUSIONS After re-irradiation, the risk of progression or death is approximately four times the risk of radiation-related severe late toxicity. The risk of late toxicity may be more dependent on patient and disease factors than modifiable treatment factors. This model is useful for patient selection, pre-treatment consent and post-treatment survivorship following re-irradiation.
Collapse
|
40
|
Margalit DN, Wong SJ. Reirradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: The Who and the How. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 100:618-620. [PMID: 29413275 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle N Margalit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Stuart J Wong
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
May ME, Cash ED, Silverman CL, Redman RA, Perez CA, Wilson LD, Tennant PA, Bumpous JM, Dunlap NE. Prognostic factors and selection criteria in the retreatment of head and neck cancers. Oral Oncol 2019; 88:85-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
42
|
Zhang YM, Chen MN, Gao JM, Zhou CH, Xiao JX, Sun ZY, Liao WH, Yi XP, Zee C, Chen BT. A Predictive Scoring Model for Short-Term Local Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2018; 34:76-84. [PMID: 30585765 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2018.2531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To predict the early identification of recurrence based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients. METHODS The clinical and MRI data of 215 patients with local recurrent NPC were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to distinguish the independent risk factors for the short-term (less than 24 months) local recurrence of NPC. The predictive score model was based on the regression coefficients of significant independent variables. RESULTS Residual disease in the nasopharyngeal cavity (NC), masticator space invasion (MSI), skull base bone erosion (SBBE), and MRI-detected cranial nerve invasion (MDCNI) were all significant independent risk factors for the short-term recurrence of NPC (p < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the total score had a maximal AUC (area under the curve) value of 0.897, with a cutoff point of 10.50. The sensitivity and specificity were 79.4% and 80.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION Residual lesions in NC, MSI, SBBE, and MDCNI are independent risk factors in predicting the short-term recurrence of NPC. The authors' findings suggest that patients with a score of more than 10.50 points should be hypervigilant regarding the possibility of short-term recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You-Ming Zhang
- 1 Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming-Na Chen
- 2 Department of Ultrasonic Imaging, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian-Ming Gao
- 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chun-Hui Zhou
- 1 Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing-Xing Xiao
- 4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, ZhanJiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhong-Yi Sun
- 5 Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei-Hua Liao
- 1 Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Ping Yi
- 1 Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.,6 Postdoctoral Research Workstation of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Basic Medical Sciences, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.,7 Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of USC, Los Angeles, California.,8 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Chishing Zee
- 7 Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of USC, Los Angeles, California
| | - Bihong T Chen
- 8 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
von der Grün J, Köhn J, Loutfi-Krauss B, Blanck O, Rödel C, Balermpas P. Second infield re-irradiation with a resulting cumulative equivalent dose (EQD2 max ) of >180 Gy for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2018; 41:E48-E54. [PMID: 30521102 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For locally recurrent head and neck cancer, re-irradiation with modern techniques like stereotactic body radiotherapy is a promising, possibly curative alternative to palliative systemic therapy. METHODS We report on 1 patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and 1 patient with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Both patients received full dose primary treatment (>66 Gy, EQD2), full dose re-irradiation (>50 Gy, EQD2), and a second course of re-irradiation via robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife) for a second local recurrence. RESULTS Both treatments resulted in adequate tumor response. No grade III-IV acute or late toxicities occurred. Follow-up at 6 months after third irradiation showed partial remission for the patient with NPC. In the second case (SCC), no toxicities occurred and the tumor was in remission 18 months after last treatment. CONCLUSION These cases show that a second course of re-irradiation utilizing modern techniques like robotic radiosurgery might be feasible for carefully selected patients with head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Janett Köhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Britta Loutfi-Krauss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.,Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.,Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Suárez C, Fernández-Alvarez V, Hamoir M, Mendenhall WM, Strojan P, Quer M, Silver CE, Rodrigo JP, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Carotid blowout syndrome: modern trends in management. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:5617-5628. [PMID: 30519108 PMCID: PMC6239123 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s180164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) refers to rupture of the carotid artery and is an uncommon complication of head and neck cancer that can be rapidly fatal without prompt diagnosis and intervention. CBS develops when a damaged arterial wall cannot sustain its integrity against the patient’s blood pressure, mainly in patients who have undergone surgical procedures and radiotherapy due to cancer of the head and neck, or have been reirradiated for a recurrent or second primary tumor in the neck. Among patients irradiated prior to surgery, CBS is usually a result of wound breakdown, pharyngocutaneous fistula and infection. This complication has often been fatal in the past, but at the present time, early diagnosis and modern technology applied to its management have decreased morbidity and mortality rates. In addition to analysis of the causes and consequences of CBS, the purpose of this paper is to critically review methods for early diagnosis of this complication and establish individualized treatment based on endovascular procedures for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Suárez
- Head & Neck Cancer Laboratory, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain, .,Head & Neck Cancer Laboratory, Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, CIBERONC, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain,
| | | | - Marc Hamoir
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Oncology Program, King Albert II Cancer Institute, St Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Primoz Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Miquel Quer
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carl E Silver
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Juan P Rodrigo
- Head & Neck Cancer Laboratory, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain, .,Head & Neck Cancer Laboratory, Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, CIBERONC, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain, .,Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Alfio Ferlito
- International Head and Neck Scientific Group Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hunt A, Das P, Minsky BD, Koay EJ, Krishnan S, Herman JM, Taniguchi C, Koong A, Smith GL, Holliday EB. Hyperfractionated abdominal reirradiation for gastrointestinal malignancies. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:143. [PMID: 30086784 PMCID: PMC6081944 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1084-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We sought to determine the role of abdominal reirradiation for patients presenting with recurrent or new primary gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. At our institution, we have established a hyperfractionated, accelerated reirradiation regimen consisting of 39 Gray (Gy) in 26 twice-daily fractions. Although this regimen is used frequently in the pelvis, we sought to determine its toxicity and efficacy for abdominal tumors. Methods Twenty-four patients who received abdominal reirradiation with a hyperfractionated, accelerated approach from 2000 to 2017 were identified. Overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Several patient, tumor and treatment characteristics were evaluated on univariate analyses for association with OS and LPFS using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results Of the twenty-four patients identified, the majority (n = 11, 46%) had pancreatic adenocarcinoma as their primary disease but also included upper GI adenocarcinoma (n = 4), colon adenocarcinoma (n = 3), hepatobiliary cancers (n = 4) and other malignancies (n = 2). The majority of patients received 45–50.4Gy in 1.8Gy fractions as their initial abdominal radiation course. The median reirradiation dose was 39Gy in 26 twice-daily fractions with a minimum six hour interval. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] interval between the courses of radiotherapy was 28 [18.6–38.9] months. Only palliative reirradiation intent was associated with decreased OS. While colon adenocarcinoma primary was significantly associated with increased LPFS, the sample size was small (n = 3). The 1-yr rate of LPFS was 38%. The median [IQR] duration of freedom from local progression was 8 [3.8–19.2] months. The 1-year OS was 50% and the median (IQR) OS was 14 [6.3–19.6] months. Thirteen patients (54%) had acute side effects with one patient experiencing G3 nausea and one experiencing a G4 bleed; the remaining patients experienced G1-G2 symptoms. Conclusion Hyperfractionated, accelerated reirradiation to the abdomen was relatively well-tolerated but provided limited local control to recurrent or second primary abdominal malignancies. Reirradiation could play a role in treating these patients with palliative or curative intent, but alternative strategies for delivering increased biologically effective dose should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Hunt
- University of Texas Health San Antonio Long School of Medicine, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Cullen Taniguchi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Albert Koong
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Emma B Holliday
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yildirim BA, Topkan E. In Regard to Ward et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:1273. [PMID: 30012532 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Berna Akkus Yildirim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Adana Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey
| | - Erkan Topkan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Adana Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Randomized trial comparing two methods of re-irradiation after salvage surgery in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Once daily split-course radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy or twice daily radiotherapy with cetuximab. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:467-471. [PMID: 29784451 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2018] [Revised: 04/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A previous randomized trial in recurrent Head and Neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has shown re-irradiation combined with chemotherapy after salvage surgery significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS). The objective of this randomized trial was to compare two methods of re-irradiation in terms of toxicity and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with recurrence/second primary in previously irradiated area were randomly allocated to receive either 60 Gy over 11 weeks with concomitant 5FU - hydroxyurea (VP-arm), or 60 Gy (1.2 Gy twice daily) over 5 weeks with cetuximab (HFR-arm). Primary endpoint was treatment interruption >15 days (acute toxicity). RESULTS Twenty-six patients were included in VP-arm and 27 in HFR-arm. One patient in VP-arm experienced >15 days interruption due to toxicity, and none in HFR-arm. In both arms, all patients received at least 60 Gy. In VP-arm, 8/26 patients had chemotherapy delay and/or dose reduction. In HFR-arm, 4/27 patients had <6 cycles cetuximab. There was no significant difference in overall survival (Median OS: 37.4 months vs 21.9 months, p = 0.12). Toxicities and DFS were not different between 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS Twice daily schedule of re-irradiation of 60 Gy/5 weeks with cetuximab was tolerable and no significant difference in treatment delays occurred between two arms.
Collapse
|
48
|
Ho JC, Phan J. Reirradiation of head and neck cancer using modern highly conformal techniques. Head Neck 2018; 40:2078-2093. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.25180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2017] [Revised: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C. Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bonomo P, Cipressi S, Iermano C, Bonucci I, Masi L, Doro R, Favuzza V, Paiar F, Simontacchi G, Meattini I, Greto D, Agresti B, Livi L, Biti G. Salvage Stereotactic Re-irradiation with CyberKnife for Locally Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: A Single Center Experience. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/1578.17202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pierluigi Bonomo
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), Florence
| | - Samantha Cipressi
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), Florence
| | - Carmine Iermano
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), Florence
| | - Ivano Bonucci
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), Florence
| | - Laura Masi
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), Florence
| | - Raffaela Doro
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), Florence
| | - Virginia Favuzza
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), Florence
| | - Fabiola Paiar
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Greto
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Benedetta Agresti
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Biti
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Velez MA, Veruttipong D, Wang PC, Abemayor E, St. John M, TenNapel M, Chen AM. FDG-PET metabolic tumor parameters for the reirradiation of recurrent head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 2018; 128:2345-2350. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.27173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 02/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A. Velez
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Los Angeles California
| | | | - Pin-Chieh Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Los Angeles California
| | - Elliot Abemayor
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Kansas School of Medicine; Kansas City Kansas U.S.A
| | - Maie St. John
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Kansas School of Medicine; Kansas City Kansas U.S.A
| | - Mindi TenNapel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine; Los Angeles California
| | - Allen M. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Los Angeles California
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine; Los Angeles California
| |
Collapse
|