Absence of progression as assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors predicts survival in advanced GI stromal tumors treated with imatinib mesylate: the intergroup EORTC-ISG-AGITG phase III trial

Predictive performance of [18F]F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-42 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in evaluating response of recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: complementary or alternative to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT?

Background

Accurately and promptly predicting the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) to targeted therapy is essential for optimizing treatment strategies. However, some fractions of recurrent or metastatic GISTs present as non-FDG-avid lesions, limiting the value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) in treatment evaluation. This study evaluated the efficacy of [18F]F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-42 [18F]FAPI-42) PET/CT for assessing the treatment response in recurrent or metastatic GISTs, in comparison to [18F]FDG PET/CT and explores a model integrating PET/CT imaging and clinical parameters to optimize the clinical use of these diagnostic tools.

Methods

Our retrospective analysis included 27 patients with recurrent or metastatic GISTs who underwent [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT at baseline before switching targeted therapy. Treatment response status was divided into a progression group (PG) and a non-progression group (NPG) based on the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, according to the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan at six months. [18F]FAPI-42 and [18F]FDG PET/CT parameters including the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), the standard uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak), the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor-to-blood pool SUV ratio (TBR), tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (TLR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV)/FAPI-positive tumor volume (GTV-FAPI), total lesion glycolysis (TLG)/FAPI-positive total lesion accumulation (TLF) were correlated with the response status to identify indicative of treatment response. The predictive performance of them was quantified by generating receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), calibration curves, and cross-validation.

Results

A total of 110 lesions were identified in 27 patients. Compared with PG, NPG was associated with lower levels of TBR and SUVmean in FDG PET/CT (TBR-FDG, SUVmean-FDG; P=0.033 and P=0.038, respectively), with higher SULpeak and TLF in FAPI PET/CT (SULpeak-FAPI, TLF-FAPI; P=0.10 and P=0.049, respectively). The predictive power of a composite-parameter model, including TBR-FDG, SULpeak-FAPI, gene mutation, and type of targeted therapy [area under the curve (AUC) =0.865], was superior to the few-parameter models incorporating TBR-FDG (AUC =0.637, P<0.001), SULpeak-FAPI (AUC =0.665, P<0.001) or both (AUC =0.721, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Both [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT have value in predicting the treatment response of recurrent or metastatic GISTs. And [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT offers synergistic value when used in combination with [18F]FDG PET/CT. Notably, the nomogram generated from the model incorporating [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT, [18F]FDG PET/CT parameters, gene mutation, and type of targeted therapy could yield more precise predictions of the response of recurrent metastatic GISTs.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): British Sarcoma Group clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

British Sarcoma Group guidelines for the management of GIST were initially informed by those published by the European Society of Clinical Oncology. This update was written by a group of experts to includes a discussion of the highlight improvements in our knowledge of the disease and recent treatment developments. The guidelines include sections on Incidence, Aetiology, Diagnosis, including risk assessment, Treatment and Follow-up.

METHODS

A careful review of the literature was performed to ensure that wherever possible recommendations are supported by the results of clinical trials or substantive retrospective reports. Areas of uncertainty are indicated appropriately.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines represent a consensus view of current best clinical practice. Where appropriate, key recommendations are given and the levels of evidence and strength of recommendation gradings are those used by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO).

CT features combined with RECIST 1.1 criteria improve progression assessments of sunitinib-treated gastrointestinal stromal tumors

OBJECTIVES

To explore the auxiliary value of combining CT features with existing response evaluation criteria in the prediction of progressive disease (PD) in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) patients treated with sunitinib.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-one patients with GISTs who received sunitinib were included in this retrospective multicenter study and divided into training and external validation cohorts. Progression at six months was determined as a reference standard. The predictive performance of the RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria was compared. CT features at baseline and the first follow-up were analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the most significant predictors and develop modified criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 216 lesions showed a good response and 107 showed a poor response in 81 patients. The RECIST 1.1 criteria performed better than the Choi criteria in predicting progression (AUC, 0.75 vs. 0.69, p = 0.04). The expanded/intensified high-enhancement area, blurred tumor-tissue interface, and progressive enlarged vessels feeding or draining the mass (EVFDM) differed significantly between lesions with good and poor responses in the training cohort (p = 0.001, 0.003, and 0.000, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the expanded/intensified high-enhancement area (p = 0.001), progressive EVFDM (p = 0.000), and RECIST PD (p = 0.000) were independent predictive factors. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria were developed and showed significantly higher AUCs in the training and external validation cohorts than the RECIST 1.1 criteria (training: 0.81 vs. 0.73, p = 0.002; validation: 0.82 vs. 0.77, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The mRECIST criteria, combining CT features with the RECIST 1.1 criteria, demonstrated superior performance in the prediction of early progression in GIST patients receiving sunitinib.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The mRECIST criteria, which combine CT features with the RECIST 1.1 criteria, may facilitate the early detection of progressive disease in GIST patients treated with sunitinib, thereby potentially guiding the timely switch to late-line medications or combination with surgical excision.

KEY POINTS

• The RECIST 1.1 criteria outperformed the Choi criteria in identifying progression of GISTs in patients treated with sunitinib. • GISTs displayed different morphologic features on CT depending on how they responded to sunitinib. • Combining CT morphologic features with the RECIST 1.1 criteria allowed for the prompt and accurate identification of progressing GIST lesions.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Masquerading As Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Challenging Diagnosis

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare lesions of the gastrointestinal tract that have a strong predisposition to the stomach and small intestine. We present a case of an 89-year-old female who initially presented to the emergency room with signs and symptoms of acute decompensated heart failure (HF) and was later discovered to have a 23-centimeter GIST in her abdominal cavity. This case emphasizes the implications of large intraperitoneal neoplasms and the unique constellation of symptoms they may present with.

Efficacy and safety of ripretinib in Chinese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a real-world, multicenter, observational study

Introduction

Mutations in KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRA) render the available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) ineffective in treating advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Ripretinib, a broad-spectrum switch-control kinase inhibitor, has shown increased efficacy and manageable safety, but real-world evidence remains scarce. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of ripretinib among Chinese patients in a real-world setting.

Methods

Advanced GIST patients (N=23) receiving ripretinib following progression on previous lines of TKI treatment were enrolled to determine the efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The median PFS (mPFS) of efficacy analysis set (EAS) (N=21) was 7.1 months. mPFS of patients receiving ripretinib following ≤2 lines of previous TKI treatment and ≥3 prior lines of therapy were 7.1 and 9.2 months, respectively. The median OS (mOS) was 12.0 months and shorter interval between the end of the latest TKI and ripretinib therapy was correlated with longer median PFS and OS (p=0.054 and p=0.046), respectively. Alopecia and asthenia were the most common AEs observed.

Conclusion

Compared to previous lines of TKI in advanced GIST patients, ripretinib showed superior efficacy with clinically manageable AEs. Real-world results are comparable to that of phase III INVICTUS study and its Chinese bridging study. Hence, ripretinib can be used for the clinical management of advanced GIST patients.

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Non-Metastatic Gastric GISTs

Surgical resection with negative margins of non-metastatic gastric GISTs is considered the main therapeutic option in GISTs treatment. Neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib is associated with higher response rates in advanced GISTs. We reported 34 patients with non-metastatic gastric GISTs who underwent partial gastrectomy at the Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt, after receiving a daily dose of 400 mg of imatinib as a neoadjuvant treatment in the period between October 2012 and January 2021. Twenty-two cases underwent open partial gastrectomy, and twelve cases had a laparoscopic partial gastrectomy. The median tumor size at diagnosis was 13.5 cm (range 9-26 cm) and the duration of neoadjuvant therapy was 10.91 months (range 4-12 months). Thirty-three patients had a partial response, while one patient showed progression of the disease on neoadjuvant treatment. Adjuvant therapy was conducted in 29 (85.3%) cases. Complications of neoadjuvant treatment were reported in seven cases in the form of gastritis, bleeding per rectum, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and edema lower limbs. The disease-free survival (DFS) in this study was 34.53 months, and the overall survival (OS) was 37 months. Recurrence developed in two cases, gastric and peritoneal recurrence (25 and 48 months from the initial diagnosis, respectively). We have concluded that neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib for non-metastatic gastric GISTs is a safe and effective method for tumor downsizing and devitalization to allow minimally invasive and/or organ sparing surgery. Moreover, it decreases the risk of intraoperative tumor rupture and relapse, thus improving the oncological outcome of such tumors.

Impact of neoadjuvant treatment on rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare disease and rectal GISTs is only 5% of total GISTs, they have the worst prognosis. Due to narrow pelvis, tumor rupture or positive resection margin are common in the management of rectal GISTs. The impact of neoadjuvant treatment on the clinical outcomes of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remains unclear. Thus, we conducted a retrospective study to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant imatinib on rectal GIST. The cohort comprised 33 patients; of them, 10 and 23 belonged to the neoadjuvant (i.e., those who underwent neoadjuvant imatinib treatment) and the control group (i.e., those who underwent surgery without prior imatinib treatment), respectively. Neoadjuvant group was associated with more common levator ani muscle displacement (P = 0.002), and showed significantly larger radiologic tumor size (P = 0.036) than the control group. The mean tumor size was significantly decreased after imatinib treatment (6.8 cm to 4.7cm, P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in resection margin involvement (P >0.999), and sphincter preservation rates (P = 0.627) between the two groups. No difference was observed with respect to morbidities, hospital stay, local recurrence and disease-free survival. Neoadjuvant imatinib treated group had similar propensity with control group after treatment. We thought reduced tumor sized could enhance resectability and provide more chance to preserve sphincter for rectal GIST patients. Considering large tumor size and higher rate of sphincter invasion in the neoadjuvant group, imatinib treatment could be helpful as a conversion strategy to make huge and low-lying rectal GIST operable and achieve better surgical outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Ripretinib in Chinese Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors as a Fourth- or Later-Line Therapy: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase II Study

PURPOSE

This is a phase II multicenter, single-arm, open-label study assessing the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ripretinib in Chinese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) as a fourth- or later-line therapy. It was designed to show consistency with the phase III INVICTUS study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with disease progression on (or intolerance to) prior imatinib, sunitinib, and at least one other drug were recruited to receive ripretinib 150 mg once daily continuously in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) based on independent radiologic review (IRR). Secondary efficacy endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) based on IRR and overall survival. Safety endpoints included the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

Between April 2020 and August 2020, 39 patients were enrolled. All were included in the safety analysis while 38 were included in the efficacy analysis. By primary data cut-off (February 26, 2021), the median PFS [90% confidence interval (CI)] was 7.2 (2.9-7.3) months; the lower bound of the 90% CI exceeded 1 month, fulfilling the standard of bridging success. The ORR (95% CI) based on IRR was 18.4% (7.7%-34.3%). Treatment-related treatment-emergent AEs (TRAE) were reported in 37 (94.9%) patients. The majority of TRAEs were of grade 1/2. A total of 6 patients (15.4%) experienced grade 3/4 TRAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated that ripretinib can clinically improve the outcomes of Chinese patients with advanced GIST as a fourth- or later-line therapy. The efficacy, safety, and PK profiles of ripretinib are consistent with those in the global patient population.

Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach

Treatment response assessment by imaging plays a vital role in evaluating changes in solid tumors during oncology therapeutic clinical trials. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 is the reference standard imaging response criteria and provides details regarding image acquisition, image interpretation and categorical response classification. While RECIST 1.1 is applied for the majority of clinical trials in solid tumors, other criteria and modifications have been introduced when RECIST 1.1 outcomes may be incomplete. Available criteria beyond RECIST 1.1 can be explored in an algorithmic fashion dependent on imaging modality, tumor type and method of treatment. Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is available for use with PET/CT. Modifications to RECIST 1.1 can be tumor specific, including mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma and mesothelioma. Choi criteria for gastrointestinal stromal tumors incorporate tumor density with alterations to categorical response thresholds. Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) imaging criteria combine RECIST 1.1 findings with those of bone scans. In addition, multiple response criteria have been created to address atypical imaging responses in immunotherapy.

Multimodal functional imaging for early response assessment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Several imaging modalities are used in the early work-up of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and there is a need to establish whether they provide similar or complimentary information.

PURPOSE

To compare 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as early predictors of three-month outcomes for patients with GIST receiving TKI treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients with advanced GIST were prospectively included between February 2011 and June 2017. FDG PET, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), and MRI were performed before and early after onset of TKI treatment (range 8-18 days). Early response was categorized according to mRECIST (CT), the Choi criteria (CECT), and PERCIST (FDG PET/CT). For MRI, volumetry from T2-weighted images and change in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion-weighted imaging was used. The reference standard for early assessment was the three-month mRECIST evaluation based on CT. At three months, both stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR) were categorized as response. Clinical usefulness was defined as agreement between early and three-month assessment.

RESULTS

At the three-month assessment, 91% (32/35) were responders, 37% (13/35) PR, 54% (19/35) SD, and 9% (3/35) had progressive disease (PD). Early assessment correctly predicted three-month response in 93% (27/29) for MRI, 80% (28/35) for PERCIST, 74% (26/35) for Choi, and 23% (8/35) for mRECIST. Six patients had non-FDG-avid tumors. For the FDG-avid tumors, PET/CT correctly predicted three-month response in 97% (28/29).

CONCLUSION

MRI was superior to CECT for early assessment of TKI-treatment response in GIST. If the tumor was FDG-avid, PET and MRI were equally good. Changes in functional parameters were superior to changes in longest tumor diameter (mRECIST).

Pretreatment Tumor DNA Sequencing of KIT and PDGFRA in Endosonography-Guided Biopsies Optimizes the Preoperative Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy increases the chance of organ-preserving, radical resection in selected patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). We aimed to evaluate systematic, immediate DNA sequencing of KIT and PDGFRA in pretreatment GIST tissue to guide neoadjuvant TKI therapy and optimize preoperative tumor response.

METHODS

All patients who were candidates for neoadjuvant therapy of a suspected GIST [the study cohort (SC)] were prospectively included from January 2014 to March 2018. Patients were subjected to pretreatment endosonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) or transabdominal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy (TUS-NB), followed by immediate tumor DNA sequencing (< 2 weeks). A historic (2006-2013) reference cohort (RC) underwent work-up without sequencing before neoadjuvant imatinib (n = 42). The rate of optimal neoadjuvant therapy (Therapy_OPTIMAL) was calculated, and the induced tumor size reduction (Tumor Regression_MAX, %) was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scan.

RESULTS

The success rate of pretreatment tumor DNA sequencing in the SC (n = 81) was 77/81 (95%) [EUS-FNB 71/74 (96%); TUS-NB 6/7 (86%)], with mutations localized in KIT (n = 58), PDGFRA (n = 18), or neither gene, wild type (n = 5). In patients with a final indication for neoadjuvant therapy, the Therapy_OPTIMAL was higher in the SC compared with the RC [61/63 (97%) versus 33/42 (79%), p = 0.006], leading to a significantly higher Tumor Regression_MAX in patients treated with TKI (27% vs. 19%, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment endosonography-guided biopsy sampling followed by immediate tumor DNA sequencing of KIT and PDGFRA is highly accurate and valuable in guiding neoadjuvant TKI therapy in GIST. This approach minimizes maltreatment with inappropriate regimens and leads to improved tumor size reduction before surgery.

Role of Key Guidelines in an Era of Precision Oncology: A Primer for the Radiologist

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to familiarize radiologists with the evidence-based imaging guidelines of major oncologic societies and organizations and to discuss approaches to effective implementation of the most recent guidelines in daily radiology practice. CONCLUSION. In an era of precision oncology, radiologists in practice and radiologists in training are key stakeholders in multidisciplinary care, and their awareness and understanding of society guidelines is critically important.

Efficacy of Long-Term Adjuvant Therapy With Imatinib Mesylate After Extensive Surgical Treatment for Ruptured Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Small Intestine With Peritoneal Metastases: A Case Report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Although most patients with advanced GISTs benefit from imatinib mesylate (IM) as standard targeted therapy, the optimal duration of adjuvant IM for GIST patients with high risk of recurrence who underwent surgical resection remains unknown. In this article, we present a case of a ruptured GIST of the small intestine accompanied by peritoneal metastases, which was effectively treated by surgical procedure followed by long-term adjuvant therapy with IM. Surgical resection was performed for the ruptured small intestinal GIST, and multitude of peritoneal metastases were cauterized. The patient received adjuvant therapy with IM (400 mg/day) for 12 years without an interruption or a dose change. Peritoneal metastatic recurrence was observed by the follow-up computed tomography scan obtained 12 years after surgery, and surgical resection of the recurrent GIST was performed. The molecular examination indicated a KIT exon 11 deletion mutation in both the primary GIST and recurrent GIST. An additional point mutation was observed in the recurrent GIST in exon 17 that caused resistance to IM. The present case might indicate that extensive removal of the tumor cells through surgery and long-term administration of IM without an interruption or a dose change were important for achieving improved recurrence-free survival in patients with ruptured GISTs of the small intestine with peritoneal metastases.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor – An Overview

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors but are most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. They are commonly seen in the stomach (60%) and small intestine (30%). GISTs are likely derived from the interstitial cells of Cajal or their stem cell precursors. They are best characterized by computerized tomography and have a specific staining pattern on immunohistochemistry, i.e., C-Kit and DOG-1. The treatment of GIST is based on the risk assessment for relapse, and patients with localized GIST require resection with or without adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM). Advanced unresectable tumors are usually treated with IM, with a number of further options available for patients post progression on IM. There is an increasing emphasis on identifying C-Kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha mutations in all patients with GIST, as these are driver mutations with current and future therapeutic implications.

Ripretinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (INVICTUS): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Resistance to approved inhibitors of KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) is a clinical challenge for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours. We compared the efficacy and safety of ripretinib, a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor active against a broad spectrum of KIT and PDGFRA mutations, with placebo in patients with previously treated, advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, we enrolled adult patients in 29 specialised hospitals in 12 countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older who had advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours with progression on at least imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib or documented intolerance to any of these treatments despite dose modifications, and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either oral ripretinib 150 mg once daily (ripretenib group) or placebo once daily (placebo group). Randomisation was done via an interactive response system using randomly permuted block sizes of six and stratified according to number of previous therapies and ECOG performance status. Patients, investigators, research staff, and the sponsor study team were masked to a patient's treatment allocation until the blinded independent central review (BICR) showed progressive disease for the patient. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed by BICR. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Patients randomly assigned to placebo were permitted to cross over to ripretinib 150 mg at the time of disease progression. The INVICTUS study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03353753, and with WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, number EUCTR2017-002446-76-ES; follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 27, 2018, and Nov 16, 2018, 129 of 154 assessed patients were randomly assigned to receive either ripretinib (n=85) or placebo (n=44). At data cutoff (May 31, 2019), at a median follow-up of 6·3 months (IQR 3·2-8·2) in the ripretinib group and 1·6 months (1·1-2·7) in the placebo group, 51 patients in the ripretinib group and 37 in the placebo group had had progression-free survival events. In the double-blind period, median progression-free survival was 6·3 months (95% CI 4·6-6·9) with ripretinib compared with 1·0 months (0·9-1·7) with placebo (hazard ratio 0·15, 95% CI 0·09-0·25; p<0·0001). The most common (>2%) grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the ripretinib group (n=85) included lipase increase (four [5%]), hypertension (three [4%]), fatigue (two [2%]), and hypophosphataemia (two (2%]); in the placebo group (n=43), the most common (>2%) grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (three [7%]), fatigue (one [2%]), diarrhoea (one [2%]), decreased appetite (one [2%]), dehydration (one [2%]), hyperkalaemia (one [2%]), acute kidney injury (one [2%]), and pulmonary oedema (one [2%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in eight (9%) of 85 patients who received ripretinib and three (7%) of 43 patients who received placebo. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the placebo group (septic shock and pulmonary oedema) and one patient in the ripretinib group (cause of death unknown; the patient died during sleep).

INTERPRETATION

Ripretinib significantly improved median progression-free survival compared with placebo and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours who were resistant to approved treatments.

FUNDING

Deciphera Pharmaceuticals.

Prospective Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Imatinib Use in Locally Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Emphasis on the Optimal Duration of Neoadjuvant Imatinib Use, Safety, and Oncological Outcome

Background: Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy has been proposed for routine practice with favorable long-term results for patients with locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, clarification of the optimal duration, safety, and oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant imatinib use before surgical intervention remains necessary. Methods: We prospectively analyzed the treatment outcomes of 51 patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic GISTs treated with neoadjuvant imatinib followed by surgery. The optimal duration was defined as the timepoint when there was a <10% change in the treatment response or a size decrease of less than 5 mm between two consecutive computed tomography scans. Results: Primary tumors were located in the stomach (23/51; 45%), followed by the rectum (17/51; 33%), ileum/jejunum (9/51; 18%), and esophagus (2/51; 4%). The median maximal shrinkage time was 6.1 months, beyond which further treatment may not be beneficial. However, the maximal shrinkage time was 4.3 months for the stomach, 8.6 months for the small bowel and 6.9 months for the rectum. The R0 tumor resection rate in 27 patients after neoadjuvant imatinib and surgery was 81.5%, and 70.4% of resection procedures succeeded in organ preservation. However, 10 of 51 patients (19.6%) had complications following neoadjuvant imatinib use (six from imatinib and four from surgery). Conclusion: Our analysis supports treating GIST patients with neoadjuvant imatinib, which demonstrated favorable long-term results of combined therapy. However, careful monitoring of complications is necessary. The optimal duration of neoadjuvant imatinib use before surgical intervention is, on average, 6.1 months.

Neoadjuvant Therapy to Downstage the Extent of Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare malignant tumors in terms of incidence, and they are not linked to specific symptoms. Often, primary tumors, particularly of the stomach, rectum, or rectovaginal space, are quite large when detected, and multivisceral resection seems to be the treatment of choice as the mainstay of therapy is complete tumor removal. If a gain-of-function mutation in the KIT gene is present, drug therapy with receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) might significantly downstage primary GIST tumors.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed to identify the current evidence for preoperative treatment of GIST regarding toxicity, efficacy, and oncological outcome, including mutational data from our own database.

RESULTS

Four phase II as well as several cohort studies showed acceptable toxicity and no increased perioperative morbidity of preoperative imatinib. Progressive disease during preoperative treatment was a rare event, and partial response was achieved in 40-80% of all patients. For methodological reasons, the trials cannot prove an oncological long-term superiority of preoperative treatment.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative therapy with imatinib is safe and recommended for patients with locally advanced GIST. Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy may enable less invasive and organ-sparing surgery, avoid tumor rupture during extensive resectional procedures, and improve the quality of perioperative RTKI treatment.

Tumoral cavitation in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable lung metastasis treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Efficacy and the frequency of tumor cavitation have not been investigated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and lung metastases (LMs) treated with chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for unresectable mCRC with LM and to determine the frequency of tumor cavitation, and its correlation with clinical outcomes in patients receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC and LMs treated with bevacizumab as first- or second-line therapy at West China Hospital, Sichuan University Cancer Center from September 2010 to November 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Data on clinicopathological characteristic were collected and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were determined.

RESULTS

Among 60 patients included in the study, response rate (RR), stable disease (SD), and DCR were 43.6% (17/39), 51.3% (20/39) and 94.9% (37/39) in patients receiving bevacizumab as first-line treatment. Median OS and PFS of the first-line treatment group were 32.4 and 15.5 months, respectively. Among 60, 12 patients (20%) developed cavitation after bevacizumab therapy initiation. Median OS was longer in patients with cavitation than those without cavitation (42.1 vs 30.8 months; p = 0.042) in the first-line treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy exhibited promising efficacy in mCRC patients LMs. Moreover, our findings reveal that OS might be affected by new tumor cavitation during antiangiogenic agent treatment.

Surgery for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: to whom and how to?

Although imatinib is a standard treatment for metastatic or recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), acquired c-kit mutations reportedly cause secondary resistance to imatinib. Sunitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that can be used as second-line therapy in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant GISTs. For sunitinib-resistant or -intolerant GISTs, regorafenib is a standard third-line treatment. Although TKI therapies have revolutionized the treatment of recurrent or metastatic GISTs, they cannot cure GISTs. Therefore, in the era of TKIs, role of cytoreductive surgery for recurrent or metastatic GISTs has been discussed. Retrospective studies of treatment strategies with front-line surgery prior to imatinib have shown that initial cytoreduction confers no benefit in cases of advanced or recurrent GIST, and administering imatinib is the principle treatment. Most retrospective studies report cytoreductive surgery to be feasible in patients with metastatic GIST whose disease is stable or responsive to imatinib. Cytoreductive surgery may be indicated in limited disease progression refractory to imatinib when complete resection is possible, but case selection is critical. Cytoreductive surgery for metastatic GIST treated with sunitinib seems less feasible because of high rates of incomplete resections and complications. The role of cytoreductive surgery for metastatic GISTs would be difficult to establish in a prospective study; individualized treatments need to be carefully designed based on c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) mutations and other factors.

Evaluation of Alterations in Tumor Tissue of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) in Computed Tomography Following Treatment with Imatinib

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the alterations in the neoplastic tissue of GIST following Imatinib treatment.

Material/Methods

CT studies of 14 patients with inoperable primary tumors and 56 patients with metastatic and recurrent disease after chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. The following alterations in features of primary and secondary tumors were analyzed: dimension, degree and type of contrast enhancement, outlines of lesions, presence of intratumoral bleeding, presence of calcifications.

Results

In the analyzed group of primary, metastatic and recurrent tumors after treatment with Imatinib in most cases a decrease in size and contrast enhancement were observed; the outlines of lesions became well circumscribed. Following the treatment, the number of tumors enhancing inhomogeneously decreased. In primary tumors the percentage of calcifications increased, whereas in metastatic tumors calcifications were observed only after treatment. There was no bleeding found within primary tumors after treatment. In metastatic disease, increased percentage of tumors with transient intratumoral bleeding was observed. There were also some unconventional CT images following treatment, such as: cystic transformation of lesions, enlargement of lesions, appearing of new lesions suggesting progression of the disease, stationary dimensions of lesions during local progression of the disease, simultaneous decrease and increase in size of metastatic lesions or appearance of new ones.

Conclusions

Right from the start of Imatinib therapy in inoperable and disseminated GIST patients, specific CT images, not seen during conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, were observed.

Occurrence and significance of morphologic changes in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer treated with Cabozantinib

OBJECTIVE

To compare performance of RECIST1.1 and Choi criteria in assessment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with cabozantinib.

METHODS

Thirty patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer enrolled in phase 2 clinical trial received cabozantinib. Clinical benefit rates assessed by prospectively determined RECIST1.1 and retrospectively assessed Choi criteria were compared.

RESULTS

Decreased tumor density (≥15%) at first follow-up was seen in 22/30(73%) patients. CBR was 40% (95%CI:23-59%) by RECIST1.1, and 73% (95%CI:54-88%) by Choi (NPV=100%, 95%CI:63-100%; PPV=55%, 95%CI:32-76%).

CONCLUSIONS

Morphologic changes are seen in the majority of patients treated with cabozantinib, making Choi criteria valuable in response assessment.

Recent advances in managing gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Constitutive activating mutations in KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α ( PDGFRα) are heavily involved in the pathobiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). This disease has served as an effective "proof-of-concept" model for targeting gain-of-function kinase mutations in cancer. This review discusses the current standard of care in terms of pharmacotherapy in the management of localized and metastatic GISTs.

Imaging therapy response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) with FDG PET, CT and MRI: a systematic review

Purpose

Improvement of the therapeutic approaches in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) by the introduction of targeted therapies requires appropriate diagnostic tools, which allow sufficient assessment of therapeutic response, including differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression due to myxoid degeneration or intratumoral hemorrhage. In this literature review the impact and limitations of different imaging modalities used in GIST therapy monitoring are discussed.

Methods

PubMed and Cochrane library search were performed using appropriate keywords. Overall, 39 original papers fulfilled the defined criteria and were included in this systematic review.

Results

Morphological imaging modalities like computed tomography (CT) are primarily used for both diagnosis and therapy monitoring. However, therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies in GIST may lead only to a minor tumor volume reduction even in cases of response. Therefore, the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) has limitations. To overcome those limitations, modified response criteria have been introduced for the CT-based therapy assessment, like the Choi criteria as well as criteria based on dual energy CT studies. Functional imaging techniques, mostly based on FDG PET-CT are in use, in particular for the assessment of early treatment response.

Conclusions

The impact and the limitations of PET-based therapy monitoring, as well as its comparison with CT, MRI and survival data are discussed in this review. CT is still the standard method for the evaluation of therapy response despite its several limitations. FDG PET-CT is helpful for the assessment of early therapy response; however, more prospective data are needed to define its role as well as the appropriate time intervals for therapy monitoring. A multiparametric evaluation based on changes in both morphological and functional data has to be assessed in further prospective studies.

UK clinical practice guidelines for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST)

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the commonest STS and arises within the wall of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. While most GISTs occur in the stomach they do occur in all parts of the GI tract. As with other STS, it is important that GISTs are managed by expert teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, as well as recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further knowledge of the disease. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field.

METHODOLOGY

British Sarcoma Group guidelines for the management of GIST were initially developed by a panel of physicians experienced in the management of GIST. This current version has been updated and amended with reference to other European and US guidance. We have received input from representatives of all diagnostic and treatment disciplines as well as patient representatives. Levels of evidence and strength of recommendation gradings are those used by ESMO adapted from those published by the Infectious Disease Society of America.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines cover aetiology, genetics and underlying molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and initial investigations, staging and risk stratification, surgery, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, the management of advanced disease and follow-up. The importance of mutational analysis in guiding treatment is highlighted, since this can indicate the most effective treatment and avoid administration of ineffective drugs, emphasising the need for management in specialist centres.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues, and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. However, this makes it more important that STS are managed by teams, expert in such cases, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, as well as recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous version published in 2010 (Grimer et al. in Sarcoma 2010:506182, 2010). The original guidelines were drawn up following a consensus meeting of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This current version has been updated and amended with reference to other European and US guidance. There are specific recommendations for the management of selected subtypes of disease including retroperitoneal and uterine sarcomas, as well as aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumours) and other borderline tumours commonly managed by sarcoma services. An important aim in sarcoma management is early diagnosis and prompt referral. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to one of the specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma services, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging, plus a biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon. In tumours at higher risk of recurrence or metastasis pre- or post-operative radiotherapy should be considered. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilized in some cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late-effects of treatment. For local recurrence, and more rarely in selected cases of metastatic disease, surgical resection would be considered. Treatment for metastases may include radiotherapy, or systemic therapy guided by the sarcoma subtype. In some cases, symptom control and palliative care support alone will be appropriate.

Neoadjuvant imatinib: longer the better, need to modify risk stratification for adjuvant imatinib

BACKGROUND

Multimodality treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with surgery and adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM), along with an emerging role for neoadjuvant IM prior to evaluation for resectability has resulted in high survival rates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent surgery for GIST, prior to or followed by IM therapy. A total of 112 patients underwent surgery between January 2009 and March 2015 at our centre. This included 27 patients with upfront resectable disease, 76 patients with locally advanced GIST who received neoadjuvant IM followed by surgery and 9 patients with metastatic disease who had excellent response to IM and were taken for surgery.

RESULTS

The primary tumor in the non metastatic patients was in the stomach (53%), duodenum (16%), rectum (12%), jejunum (11%), ileum (7%), and others (2%). Median duration of neoadjuvant IM was 5 months with 4 patients showing disease progression during neoadjuvant IM. Ninety-three percent of all patients had R0 resections, while 7% had R+ resections. The estimated 3- and 5-year DFS in non-metastatic patients was 86.1% and 67% respectively with a 3- and 5-year median OS of 95.4% and 91.7% respectively. Five-year PFS and OS for the metastatic patients was 88.8% and 100% respectively. Lack of adjuvant IM was the only factor related to inferior PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer duration of neoadjuvant IM should be considered in locally advanced GIST prior to surgery and resection may be considered in responding metastatic patients.

Combined Therapy of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Radical surgery is the mainstay of therapy for primary resectable, localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Nevertheless, approximately 40% to 50% of patients with potentially curative resections develop recurrent or metastatic disease. The introduction of imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the therapy of advanced (inoperable and/or metastatic) GIST and has become the standard of care in treatment of patients with advanced GIST. This article discusses the proper selection of candidates for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced GIST, exploring the available evidence behind the combination of preoperative imatinib and surgery.

Comparison of performance of various tumor response criteria in assessment of sunitinib activity in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of various tumor response criteria (TRC) in the assessment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treated with sunitinib after failure of imatinib.

METHODS

Sixty-two participants with advanced GIST in two clinical trials received oral sunitinib after prior failure of imatinib (median duration 24 weeks; interquartile range 14-56) and were followed with contrast-enhanced computed tomography at baseline and thereafter at median intervals of 6 weeks (IRQ 6-9). Tumor response was prospectively determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0, and retrospectively reassessed for comparison using RECIST 1.1, Choi criteria, and modified Choi (mChoi) criteria using the original target lesions. For mChoi criteria, progressive disease was defined as 20% increase in sum of the longest dimension, similar to RECIST 1.1. Clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete response, partial response, or stable disease ≥12 weeks) and progression-free survival were compared between various TRCs using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

While partial response as the best response was more frequent by Choi and mChoi criteria (50% each) than RECIST 1.1 (15%) and RECIST 1.0 (13%), CBR was similar between various TRCs (overall CBR 60%-77%, 77%-94% agreement between all TRC pairs). Time to best response was shorter for Choi and mChoi criteria (median 11 weeks each) compared to RECIST 1.1 and RECIST 1.0 (median 25 and 24 weeks, respectively). PFS was similar for RECIST 1.1, RECIST 1.0, and mChoi (median 35 weeks each), and shortest for Choi criteria (median 23 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

CBR was similar among the various TRCs, although Choi criteria led to earlier determination of disease progression. Therefore, RECIST 1.1 and mChoi criteria may be preferred for response assessment in patients with advanced GIST.

Relationship between imatinib trough concentration and outcomes in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Imatinib has dramatically improved the prognosis of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Clinical trial data showed that patients with trough imatinib plasma concentrations (Cmin) below 1100 ng/ml (quartile 1) had shorter time to progression, but no threshold has been defined. The main objective of this study was to investigate in advanced GIST whether a Cmin threshold value associated with a longer progression-free survival (PFS) could be specified. This would be the first step leading to therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib in GIST.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced GIST patients (n=96) treated with imatinib 400 mg/d (41 stomach, 34 small bowel, and 21 other primary site localisations) were prospectively included in this real-life setting study. Routine plasma level testing imatinib (Cmin) and clinical data of were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

Small bowel localisation was associated with an increased relative risk of progression of 3.09 versus stomach localisation (p=0.0255). Mean Cmin (±standard deviation) was 868 (±536) ng/ml with 75% inter-individual and 26% intra-patient variability. A Cmin threshold of 760 ng/ml defined by log-rank test was associated with longer PFS for the whole population (p=0.0256) and for both stomach (p=0.043) and small bowel (p=0.049) localisations when analysed separately. Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that Cmin above 760 ng/ml was associated with 65% reduction risk of progression (p=0.0271) in the whole population independently of the anatomical localisation.

CONCLUSION

Concentration of imatinib significantly influences duration of tumour control treatment in GIST patients with a Cmin threshold of 760 ng/ml associated with prolonged PFS in real-life setting.

The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a rare type of cancer, they are the commonest sarcoma in the gastrointestinal tract. Molecularly targeted therapy, such as imatinib therapy, has revolutionized the treatment of advanced GIST and facilitates scientific research on GIST. Nevertheless, surgery remains a mainstay of treatment to obtain a permanent cure for GIST even in the era of targeted therapy. Many GIST guidelines have been published to guide the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. We review current versions of GIST guidelines published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, by the European Society for Medical Oncology, and in Japan. All clinical practice guidelines for GIST include recommendations based on evidence as well as on expert consensus. Most of the content is very similar, as represented by the following examples: GIST is a heterogeneous disease that may have mutations in KIT, PDGFRA, HRAS, NRAS, BRAF, NF1, or the succinate dehydrogenase complex, and these subsets of tumors have several distinctive features. Although there are some minor differences among the guidelines--for example, in the dose of imatinib recommended for exon 9-mutated GIST or the efficacy of antigen retrieval via immunohistochemistry--their common objectives regarding diagnosis and treatment are not only to improve the diagnosis of GIST and the prognosis of patients but also to control medical costs. This review describes the current standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of GISTs based on the recommendations of several guidelines and expert consensus.

Comparison of performance of various tumour response criteria in assessment of regorafenib activity in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib

PURPOSE

To compare performance of various tumour response criteria (TRCs) in assessment of regorafenib activity in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) with prior failure of imatinib and sunitinib.

METHODS

Twenty participants in a phase II trial received oral regorafenib (median duration 47 weeks; interquartile range (IQR) 24-88) with computed tomography (CT) imaging at baseline and every two months thereafter. Tumour response was prospectively determined on using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1, and retrospectively reassessed for comparison per RECIST 1.0, World Health Organization (WHO) and Choi criteria, using the same target lesions. Clinical benefit rate [CBR; complete or partial response (CR or PR) or stable disease (SD)≥16 weeks] and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between various TRCs using kappa statistics. Performance of TRCs in predicting overall survival (OS) was compared by comparing OS in groups with progression-free intervals less than or greater than 20 weeks by each TRC using c-statistics.

RESULTS

PR was more frequent by Choi (90%) than RECIST 1.1, RECIST 1.0 and WHO (20% each), however, CBR was similar between various TRCs (overall CBR 85-90%, 95-100% agreement between all TRC pairs). PFS per RECIST 1.0 was similar to RECIST 1.1 (median 44 weeks versus 58 weeks), and shorter for WHO (median 34 weeks) and Choi (median 24 weeks). With RECIST 1.1, RECIST 1.0 and WHO, there was moderate concordance between PFS and OS (c-statistics 0.596-0.679). Choi criteria had less favourable concordance (c-statistic 0.506).

CONCLUSIONS

RECIST 1.1 and WHO performed somewhat better than Choi criteria as TRC for response evaluation in patients with advanced GIST after prior failure on imatinib and sunitinib.

What are the current outcomes of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: who are the long-term survivors treated initially with imatinib?

The introduction of imatinib to clinical practice revolutionized therapy of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but its long-term results have been only just collected. We have attempted to identify factors related to the long-term survival. We have analyzed the data of 430 inoperable/metastatic/recurrent GIST patients treated with imatinib in reference centers, assessed the factors influencing the long-term overall survival (OS), and compared the outcomes in three periods of initiation of imatinib therapy during one decade (2001–2003, 2004–2006, 2007–2010). During analyzed time periods, we have found decrease in median largest tumor size at the start of imatinib therapy: 90.5 mm (2001–2003) versus 74 mm (2004–2006) versus 58 mm (2007–2010) (p = 0.002). Median progression-free survival (PFS) on 1st line imatinib was 37.5 months, without differences in PFS between three groups. Median OS was 5.8 years, 8-year OS rate was 43 %, and no difference in OS was demonstrated for patients treated in analyzed time periods. Independent good prognostic factors for longer OS were as follows: surgery of residual disease, initial WHO performance status 0/1, normal baseline albumin level, and the presence of exon 11 KIT mutations. Current median OS in advanced GIST reaches 6 years. The long-term survivors were characterized by smaller maximal tumors at imatinib start, better blood tests results, better performance status, and the surgical removal of residual disease. The latter might reduce the impact of tumor size and equalize the long-term results of therapy during last decade from introduction of imatinib. After introduction of subsequent lines of therapy (as sunitinib), the effect of primary mutational status on the long-term OS is also less visible.

Neoadjuvant imatinib in locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): the EORTC STBSG experience

BACKGROUND

Preoperative imatinib therapy of locally advanced GIST may facilitate resection and decrease morbidity of the procedure.

METHODS

We have pooled databases from 10 EORTC STBSG sarcoma centers and analyzed disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in 161 patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic GISTs who received neoadjuvant imatinib. OS was calculated from start of imatinib therapy for locally advanced disease until death or last follow-up (FU) after resection of the GIST. DFS was calculated from date of resection to date of disease recurrence or last FU. Median FU time was 46 months.

RESULTS

The primary tumor was located in the stomach (55%), followed by rectum (20%), duodenum (10%), ileum/jejunum/other (11%), and esophagus (3%). The tumor resection after preoperative imatinib (median time on therapy, 40 weeks) was R0 in 83%. Only two patients have demonstrated disease progression during neoadjuvant therapy. Five-year DSS/DFS rates were 95/65%, respectively, median OS was 104 months, and median DFS was not reached. There were 56% of patients who continued imatinib after resection. Thirty-seven GIST recurrences were diagnosed (only 5 local relapses). The most common mutations affected exon 11 KIT (65%). Poorer DFS was related to primary tumor location in small bowel and lack of postoperative therapy with imatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis comprising the largest group of GIST patients treated with neoadjuvant imatinib in routine practice indicates excellent long-term results of combined therapy in locally advanced GISTs.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care in Austria

Optimal treatment for patients suffering from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is based on an interdisciplinary treatment approach. Austrian representatives of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Gastroenterology, and Laboratory Medicine issued this manuscript on a consensual base within the context of currently available and published literature. This paper contains guidelines and recommendations for diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of GIST patients in Austria.

Moving beyond response criteria: new measures of success in the treatment of sarcomas

There is an urgent need to develop new therapies for soft tissue sarcomas. Traditional cytotoxic therapies, such as doxorubicin and ifosfamide, have been the standard approach to this disease. However, newer paradigms are emerging that are less toxic while targeting dysregulated pathways, tumor hypoxia, and genetic translocations. These newer therapies require different measures of activity as standard response criteria may inaccurately measure their effectiveness. Serious consideration of select endpoints and measures of tumor response are crucial to make significant strides in the treatment of sarcomas. Current studies on soft tissue sarcomas are slowly abandoning response rates while employing progression-free survival and time to progression as improved endpoints. With time and data, our understanding of the relative activity of these agents will grow and lead to improved benefits for our patients.

Influence of imatinib interruption and rechallenge on the residual disease in patients with advanced GIST: results of the BFR14 prospective French Sarcoma Group randomised, phase III trial

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated that interruption of imatinib mesylate (IM) in responding patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) results in rapid reprogression. The impact of interruption on residual tumour, quality of response and secondary resistance has not been fully investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within the BRF14 study, 71 non-progressing patients were randomly assigned in the interruption arms after 1, 3 or 5 years. IM was resumed in the case of progressive disease (PD). Tumour status at randomisation, relapse and after IM rechallenge, progression-free survival (PFS) and time to secondary resistance were analysed.

RESULTS

At data cut-off, 51 of 71 patients had restarted IM following documented PD. Eighteen patients (35%) progressed on known lesions only, while 33 patients (65%) had new lesions, with concomitant progression of known lesions in 17 patients. Only 8 (42%) of complete remission (CR) patients and 12 (52%) of partial response (PR) patients at randomisation achieved a new CR and PR. Patients progressing rapidly after interruption had a poorer prognosis. Tumour status at randomisation influenced time to progression after rechallenge.

CONCLUSION

In advanced GIST patients interrupting IM, quality of response upon reintroduction did not reach the tumour status observed at randomisation. Rapid progression after imatinib interruption is associated with poor PFS after reintroduction.