1
|
Bertho A, Ortiz R, Maurin M, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Espenon J, Ramasamy G, Patriarca A, De Marzi L, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. Thoracic Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy: Tissue Preservation and Survival Advantage Over Conventional Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:579-592. [PMID: 38621606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is an innovative radiation therapy approach that highly modulates the spatial dimension of the dose delivery using narrow, parallel, and submillimetric proton beamlets. pMBRT has proven its remarkable healthy tissue preservation in the brain and skin. This study assesses the potential advantages of pMBRT for thoracic irradiations compared with conventional radiation therapy in terms of normal tissue toxicity. The challenge here was the influence of respiratory motion on the typical peak and valley dose patterns of pMBRT and its potential biologic effect. METHODS AND MATERIALS The whole thorax of naïve C57BL/6 mice received one fraction of high dose (18 Gy) pMBRT or conventional proton therapy (CPT) without any respiratory control. The development of radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis was longitudinally monitored using cone beam computed tomography. Anatomopathologic analysis was carried out at 9 months postirradiation and focused on the reaction of the lungs' parenchyma and the response of cell types involved in the development of radiation-induced fibrosis and lung regeneration as alveolar type II epithelial cells, club cells, and macrophages. RESULTS pMBRT has milder effects on survival, skin reactions, and lung fibrosis compared with CPT. The pMBRT-induced lung changes were more regional and less severe, with evidence of potential reactive proliferation of alveolar type II epithelial cells and less extensive depletion of club cells and macrophage invasion than the more damaging effects observed in CPT. CONCLUSIONS pMBRT appears suitable to treat moving targets, holding a significant ability to preserve healthy lung tissue, even without respiratory control or precise targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Mathieu Maurin
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, INSERM U932, Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Julie Espenon
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Gabriel Ramasamy
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiation therapy (RadeXp), Paris, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL University, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL University, Orsay, France; Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM, Orsay
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiation therapy (RadeXp), Paris, France; Institut Curie, PSL University, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Oncologie, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adachi T, Nakamura M, Matsuo Y, Karasawa K, Kokubo M, Sakamoto T, Hiraoka M, Mizowaki T. Prospective external validation of radiomics-based predictive model of distant metastasis after dynamic tumor tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14475. [PMID: 39178139 PMCID: PMC11466494 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study aims to externally validate a predictive model for distant metastasis (DM) with computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics features in prospectively enrolled non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing dynamic tumor-tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy (DTT-SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study collected retrospective data from 567 patients across 11 institutions as the training dataset and prospectively enrolled 42 patients from four institutions as the external test dataset. Four clinical features were collected, and 944 CT-based radiomic features were extracted from gross tumor volumes. After standardization and feature selection, DM predictive models were developed using fine and gray regression (FG) and random survival forest (RSF), incorporating clinical and radiomic features, and their combinations within the training dataset. Then, the model was applied to the test dataset, dividing patients into high- and low-risk groups based on medians of risk scores. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), and the statistical significance between groups was evaluated using Gray's test. RESULTS In the training dataset, 122 of 567 patients (21.5%) developed DM, compared to 9 of 42 patients (21.4%) in the test dataset. In the test dataset, the C-indices of the clinical, radiomics, and hybrid models with FG were 0.559, 0.544, and 0.560, respectively, whereas those with RSF were 0.576, 0.604, and 0.627, respectively. The hybrid model with RSF, which exhibited the best predictive performance of all models, identified 7 of 23 patients (30.4%) as high risk and 2 of 19 patients (10.5%) as low risk for DM incidence in the test dataset (p = 0.116). CONCLUSION Although predictive models for DM lack significance when applied to prospectively enrolled cases undergoing DTT-lung SBRT, the model with RSF exhibits a consistent capacity to effectively classify patients at a high risk of developing DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takanori Adachi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied TherapyGraduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied TherapyGraduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
- Department of Advanced Medical PhysicsGraduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied TherapyGraduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Katsuyuki Karasawa
- Division of Radiation OncologyDepartmentof RadiologyTokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Masaki Kokubo
- Department of Radiation OncologyKobe City Medical Center General HospitalHyogoJapan
| | - Takashi Sakamoto
- Department of Radiation OncologyKyoto Katsura HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Masahiro Hiraoka
- Department of Radiation OncologyJapanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical CenterWakayamaJapan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied TherapyGraduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keltner S, Esslinger H, Wu X, Rai S, Takiar V. Refining Surveillance Guidelines after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:e268-e276.e1. [PMID: 38997934 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 06/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). Surveillance guidelines vary after treatment. While patients are more likely to locally recur within 2 years of treatment, there remains a paucity of data on the benefit of frequent and long-term surveillance. We evaluated a cohort of NSCLC patients to evaluate surveillance patterns and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with ES-NSCLC treated with SBRT were retrospectively evaluated. Imaging was reviewed after SBRT for evidence of recurrence or new malignancy. The median scan interval (MSI) was calculated as the median number of months between surveillance scans. The MSI between patients with or without new disease was compared by t-test. New disease development and survival between patients with =T2 disease and with or without prior malignancy was compared using χ², Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Gray's test. RESULTS A cohort of 168 patients with median follow up of 23.4 months met criteria for review with 50% developing new disease. MSI did not differ between patients with or without new disease. Patients with >=cT2 tumors had worse overall survival and trended towards higher incidence of new disease. New disease continued to occur, even 5 years after treatment. CONCLUSION Increased scan frequency did not increase detection of new disease. Patients continued to fail 5 years after treatment. Larger tumors trended toward more frequent failures and those patients experienced worse OS. Surveillance guidelines should be optimized to prevent over surveillance after treatment and to continue long-term surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Keltner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati OH
| | - Hope Esslinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati OH
| | - Xiaoyong Wu
- Cancer Data Science Center, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resources, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Shesh Rai
- Cancer Data Science Center, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resources, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Vinita Takiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati OH.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
He J, Liu Y, Zhang X, Li B, Yang L, Wang H, Wang S, Yu J, Wang L. Comparison of proton therapy and photon therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Biomark Res 2024; 12:90. [PMID: 39183306 PMCID: PMC11346271 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-024-00642-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of proton therapy (PT) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) remains controversial, with insufficient evidence to determine its superiority over photon therapy (XRT). We conducted a systematic review of PT trials in ES-NSCLC, analyzing dosimetry, efficacy, and safety across to inform clinical decision-making. Our study showed that PT reduced lung and heart dosimetric parameters compared to XRT, with significant differences in lung V5, lung V10 and mean heart dose (MHD). In terms of efficacy, there were no significant differences in 1-year OS, 3-year OS and 3-year PFS between PT and XRT. For toxicity, no significant difference was observed in treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and radiation pneumonitis (RP). Single-arm analysis of PT found that V5, V10, V20 of lung and heart V5 were 13.4%, 11.3%, 7.9% and 0.7%, respectively. The mean lung dose and MHD were 4.15 Gy and 0.17 Gy, respectively. The single-arm pooled 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year OS rates for PT were 95.3%, 82.5%, 81.3% and 69.3%, respectively. PFS rate and local control rate at 3 years were 68.1% and 91.2%, respectively. The rates of TRAEs of grade ≥ 3 and grade ≥ 2 were 2.8% and 19.8%, respectively. The grade ≥ 2 RP occurred at a rate of 8.7%. In conclusion, PT had acceptable efficacy and safety, and was better at protecting organs at risk than XRT in ES-NSCLC. However, the survival and safety benefit of PT was not significant compared to XRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyi He
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Cancer Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Yingxin Liu
- Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaojing Zhang
- Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Butuo Li
- Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Linlin Yang
- Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Haohua Wang
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Cancer Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Shijiang Wang
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Cancer Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Jinming Yu
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Cancer Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Linlin Wang
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Cancer Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iramina H, Nakamura M, Sasaki M, Mizowaki T. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography imaging during megavoltage beam irradiation under phase-gated conditions. Phys Med 2024; 123:103409. [PMID: 38870644 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Target positions should be acquired during beam delivery for accurate lung stereotactic body radiotherapy. We aimed to perform kilovoltage (kV) imaging during beam irradiation (intra-irradiation imaging) under phase-gated conditions and evaluate its performance. METHODS Catphan 504 and QUASAR respiratory motion phantoms were used to evaluate image quality and target detectability, respectively. TrueBeam STx linac and the Developer Mode was used. The imaging parameters were 125 kVp and 1.2 mAs/projection. Flattened megavoltage (MV) X-ray beam energies 6, 10 and 15 MV and un-flattened beam energies 6 and 10 MV were used with field sizes of 5 × 5 and 15 × 15 cm2 and various frame rates for intra-irradiation imaging. In addition, using a QUASAR phantom, intra-irradiation imaging was performed during intensity-modulated plan delivery. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the CT-number for the inserted rods, image noise, visual assessment, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated. RESULTS The RMSEs of intra-irradiation cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images under gated conditions were 50-230 Hounsfield Unit (HU) (static < 30 HU). The noise of the intra-irradiation CBCT images under gated conditions was 15-35 HU, whereas that of the standard CBCT images was 8.8-27.2 HU. Lower frame rates exhibited large RMSEs and noise; however, the iterative reconstruction algorithm (IR) was effective at improving these values. Approximately 7 fps with the IR showed an equivalent CNR of 15 fps without the IR. The target was visible on all the gated intra-irradiation CBCT images. CONCLUSION Several image quality improvements are required; however, intra-irradiated CBCT images showed good visual target detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiraku Iramina
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Makoto Sasaki
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ni J, Chen H, Yu L, Guo T, Zhou Y, Jiang S, Ye R, Yang X, Chu L, Chu X, Li H, Liu W, Gu Y, Yuan Z, Gong J, Zhu Z. Predicting Regional Recurrence and Prognosis in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy-Treated Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Using a Radiomics Model Constructed With Surgical Data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00743-0. [PMID: 38936632 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Risk stratification of regional recurrence (RR) is clinically important in the design of adjuvant treatment and surveillance strategies in patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This study aimed to develop a radiomics model predicting occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) using surgical data and apply it to the prediction of RR in SBRT-treated early-stage NSCLC patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent curative surgery with systematic lymph node dissection from January 2013 to December 2018 (the training cohort) and from January 2019 to December 2020 (the validation cohort) were included. A preoperative computed tomography-based radiomics model, a clinical feature model, and a fusion model predicting OLNM were constructed. The performance of the 3 models was quantified and compared in the training and validation cohorts. Subsequently, the radiomics model was used to predict RR in a cohort of consecutive SBRT-treated early-stage NSCLC patients from 2 academic medical centers. RESULTS A total of 769 patients were included. Eight computed tomography features were identified in the radiomics model, achieving areas under the curves of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.89) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.88) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Nevertheless, adding clinical features did not improve the performance of the radiomics model. With a median follow-up of 40.0 (95% CI, 35.2-44.8) months, 32 of the 213 patients in the SBRT cohort developed RR and those in the high-risk group based on the radiomics model had a higher cumulative incidence of RR (P < .001) and shorter regional recurrence-free survival (P = .02), progression-free survival (P = .004) and overall survival (P = .006) than those in the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS The radiomics model based on pathologically confirmed data effectively identified patients with OLNM, which may be useful in the risk stratification among SBRT-treated patients with clinical stage I NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianjiao Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongru Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Tiantian Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Yue Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanshan Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruiting Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Haiming Li
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yajia Gu
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| | - Jing Gong
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
| | - Zhengfei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Geng-Cahuayme AAA, Peregrín-Pastor B, Ramos-Albiac M, Recalde-Vizcay E, Parada-Zuluaga JS, Giralt-López de Sagredo J, Maldonado-Pijoan X, Giraldo-Marín A. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for patients with lung tumor and severe pulmonary function impairment. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03557-7. [PMID: 38869740 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03557-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate clinical outcomes after SABR in a cohort of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or pulmonary metastases in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with forced expiratory volume in the first second predicted (FEV1) ≤ 50%. METHODS Retrospective single-center study was performed to analyze clinical outcomes and toxicities in COPD patients with severe lung dysfunction treated with SABR from 1st June 2015 to 31st October 2022. RESULTS Thirty four patients (forty locations) were enrolled for analysis. Median follow-up was 2.9 years. Median age was 73.5 years (range, 65.6-80.1). FEV1 was 38% (range, 28.2-50.0) prior to radiotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 41.1 months (95% CI 38.9-not reached). OS rates at 2-, 3-, and 5- years were 79%, 71%, and 36%, respectively. Cancer-specific survival rates at 2-, 3-, and 5- years were 96%, 96%, and 68%, respectively. Local control rates at 2-, 3-, and 5- years were 88%, 83%, and 83%, respectively. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed. The most common acute toxicity was pneumonitis (38.2%), of which only 1 patient (2.9%) reported grade 3 acute toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Lung SABR in patients with poor pulmonary function may be effective with acceptable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Blanca Peregrín-Pastor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mónica Ramos-Albiac
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enar Recalde-Vizcay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Sebastián Parada-Zuluaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Giralt-López de Sagredo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Maldonado-Pijoan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandra Giraldo-Marín
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Iwana-Yamada M, Shibamoto Y, Baba F, Iwata H, Ishikura S, Nagayoshi J, Hiwatashi A, Ogino H. Dose Prescription to Isodose Lines in Static Multi-Beam Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors: Which Line Is Optimal? Kurume Med J 2024; 69:217-226. [PMID: 38233174 DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.ms6934016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
This study investigated the appropriate dose prescription method in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors. Static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy is a mainstream treatment in Japan. Based on the hypothesis that dose prescription to lower isodose lines may improve planning target volume dose coverage and decrease doses to organs at risk, we investigated changes in dose-volume histograms with prescription to various isodose lines for planning target volume in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy. In all treatment plans, 45 Gy in 4 fractions were prescribed to 95% of the planning target volume. By adjusting the leaf margins of each beam, various prescription isodose lines encompassing 95% volume of the planning target volume were generated. The prescription isodose lines investigated were 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90% lines relative to the maximum dose of each planning target volume. The conformity index, homogeneity index, mean lung dose, and V5-V40 of the lung were evaluated. The dose was calculated by the adaptive convolve algorithm. The conformity index was lowest in the 70% or 80% isodose plan. The mean lung doses and V10-V40 of the lung decreased steeply from the 90% to the 70% isodose plan, and was lowest in the 60% and 70% isodose plans. These indices increased in the 40% and 50% isodose plans. The optimal stereotactic body radiotherapy plans appeared to be dose prescription to the 60% or 70% isodose line. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the advantage of using this method clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maho Iwana-Yamada
- Department of Radiotherapy, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| | - Yuta Shibamoto
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| | - Fumiya Baba
- Department of Radiotherapy, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| | - Satoshi Ishikura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| | - Junpei Nagayoshi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya City University West Medical Center
| | - Akio Hiwatashi
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meng YJ, Mankuzhy NP, Chawla M, Lee RP, Yorke ED, Zhang Z, Gelb E, Lim SB, Cuaron JJ, Wu AJ, Simone CB, Gelblum DY, Lovelock DM, Harris W, Rimner A. A Prospective Study on Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Thoracic Radiation Therapy Guided by Bronchoscopically Implanted Electromagnetic Transponders. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1534. [PMID: 38672616 PMCID: PMC11048337 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electromagnetic transponders bronchoscopically implanted near the tumor can be used to monitor deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for thoracic radiation therapy (RT). The feasibility and safety of this approach require further study. METHODS We enrolled patients with primary lung cancer or lung metastases. Three transponders were implanted near the tumor, followed by simulation with DIBH, free breathing, and 4D-CT as backup. The initial gating window for treatment was ±5 mm; in a second cohort, the window was incrementally reduced to determine the smallest feasible gating window. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as completion of RT using transponder-guided DIBH. Patients were followed for assessment of transponder- and RT-related toxicity. RESULTS We enrolled 48 patients (35 with primary lung cancer and 13 with lung metastases). The median distance of transponders to tumor was 1.6 cm (IQR 0.6-2.8 cm). RT delivery ranged from 3 to 35 fractions. Transponder-guided DIBH was feasible in all but two patients (96% feasible), where it failed because the distance between the transponders and the antenna was >19 cm. Among the remaining 46 patients, 6 were treated prone to keep the transponders within 19 cm of the antenna, and 40 were treated supine. The smallest feasible gating window was identified as ±3 mm. Thirty-nine (85%) patients completed one year of follow-up. Toxicities at least possibly related to transponders or the implantation procedure were grade 2 in six patients (six incidences, cough and hemoptysis), grade 3 in three patients (five incidences, cough, dyspnea, pneumonia, and supraventricular tachycardia), and grade 4 pneumonia in one patient (occurring a few days after implantation but recovered fully and completed RT). Toxicities at least possibly related to RT were grade 2 in 18 patients (41 incidences, most commonly cough, fatigue, and pneumonitis) and grade 3 in four patients (seven incidences, most commonly pneumonia), and no patients had grade 4 or higher toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Bronchoscopically implanted electromagnetic transponder-guided DIBH lung RT is feasible and safe, allowing for precise tumor targeting and reduced normal tissue exposure. Transponder-antenna distance was the most common challenge due to a limited antenna range, which could sometimes be circumvented by prone positioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhong Jeff Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Nikhil P. Mankuzhy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Mohit Chawla
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Service, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (M.C.); (R.P.L.)
| | - Robert P. Lee
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Service, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (M.C.); (R.P.L.)
| | - Ellen D. Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA;
| | - Emily Gelb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Seng Boh Lim
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - John J. Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II)
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Dale Michael Lovelock
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - Wendy Harris
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK-Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brekner MC, Imhoff D, Rödel C, Filmann N, Licher J, Ramm U, Köhn J. Stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy and flattening filter-free beams: dosimetric considerations. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:346-357. [PMID: 38092967 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02181-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study comparatively evaluates the impact of energy-matched flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams with different energy levels on the physical-dosimetric quality of lung and liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans. METHODS For this purpose, 54 different lung and liver lesions from 44 patients who had already received SBRT combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included in this retrospective planning study. Planning computed tomography scans already available were used for the renewed planning with 6 MV, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV, and 10 MV-FFF under constant planning objectives. The treatment delivery data, dosimetric distributions, and dose-volume histograms as well as parameters such as the conformity index and gradient indices were the basis for the evaluation and comparison of treatment plans. RESULTS A significant reduction of beam-on time (BOT) was achieved due to the high dose rates of FFF beams. In addition, we showed that for FFF beams compared to flattened beams of the same energy level, smaller planning target volumes (PTV) require fewer monitor units (MU) than larger PTVs. An equal to slightly superior target volume coverage and sparing of healthy tissue as well as organs at risk in both lung and liver lesions were found. Significant differences were seen mainly in the medium to lower dose range. CONCLUSION We found that FFF beams together with VMAT represent an excellent combination for SBRT of lung or liver lesions with shortest BOT for 10 MV-FFF but significant dose savings for 6 MV-FFF in lung lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Christoph Brekner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Detlef Imhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Natalie Filmann
- Institute for Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, University Hospital, Goethe University, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jörg Licher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ulla Ramm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Janett Köhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hardcastle N, Josipovic M, Clementel E, Hernandez V, Smyth G, Gober M, Wilke L, Eaton D, Josset S, Lazarakis S, Saez J, Vieillevigne L, Jornet N, Mancosu P. Recommendation on the technical and dosimetric data to be included in stereotactic body radiation therapy clinical trial publications based on a systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:110042. [PMID: 38043902 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
The results of phase II and III trials on Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) increased adoption of SBRT worldwide. The ability to replicate clinical trial outcomes in routine practice depends on the capability to reproduce technical and dosimetric procedures used in the clinical trial. In this systematic review, we evaluated if peer-reviewed publications of clinical trials in SBRT reported sufficient technical data to ensure safe and robust implementation in real world clinics. Twenty papers were selected for inclusion, and data was extracted by a working group of medical physicists created following the ESTRO 2021 physics workshop. A large variability in technical and dosimetric data were observed, with frequent lack of required information for reproducing trial procedures. None of the evaluated studies were judged completely reproducible from a technical perspective. A list of recommendations has been provided by the group, based on the analysis and consensus process, to ensure an adequate reproducibility of technical parameters in primary SBRT clinical trials. Future publications should consider these recommendations to assist transferability of the clinical trial in real world practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Hardcastle
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & Sir Peter MacCallum, Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (RH), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Enrico Clementel
- European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Victor Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, 43204 Tarragona, Spain
| | - Gregory Smyth
- The London Radiotherapy Centre, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK
| | - Manuela Gober
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Lotte Wilke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Stéphanie Josset
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Smaro Lazarakis
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & Sir Peter MacCallum, Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jordi Saez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laure Vieillevigne
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, F-31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Núria Jornet
- Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit, Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Beckers C, Pruschy M, Vetrugno I. Tumor hypoxia and radiotherapy: A major driver of resistance even for novel radiotherapy modalities. Semin Cancer Biol 2024; 98:19-30. [PMID: 38040401 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Hypoxia in solid tumors is an important predictor of poor clinical outcome to radiotherapy. Both physicochemical and biological processes contribute to a reduced sensitivity of hypoxic tumor cells to ionizing radiation and hypoxia-related treatment resistances. A conventional low-dose fractionated radiotherapy regimen exploits iterative reoxygenation in between the individual fractions, nevertheless tumor hypoxia still remains a major hurdle for successful treatment outcome. The technological advances achieved in image guidance and highly conformal dose delivery make it nowadays possible to prescribe larger doses to the tumor as part of single high-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy, while keeping an acceptable level of normal tissue complication in the co-irradiated organs at risk. However, we insufficiently understand the impact of tumor hypoxia to single high-doses of RT and hypofractionated RT. So-called FLASH radiotherapy, which delivers ionizing radiation at ultrahigh dose rates (> 40 Gy/sec), has recently emerged as an important breakthrough in the radiotherapy field to reduce normal tissue toxicity compared to irradiation at conventional dose rates (few Gy/min). Not surprisingly, oxygen consumption and tumor hypoxia also seem to play an intriguing role for FLASH radiotherapy. Here we will discuss the role of tumor hypoxia for radiotherapy in general and in the context of novel radiotherapy treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Beckers
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Pruschy
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Irene Vetrugno
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sakane T, Nakajima K, Iwata H, Nakano T, Hagui E, Oguri M, Nomura K, Hattori Y, Ogino H, Haneda H. Lobectomy versus proton therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:1490-1501.e2. [PMID: 37625619 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lobectomy is the standard treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In recent years, an increasing number of patients with lung cancer have been treated using proton therapy (PT). We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis to compare the treatment outcomes of these 2 modalities. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 275 patients with histologically confirmed clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent lobectomy (n = 206) or PT (n = 69) at our institution from July 2013 to December 2020. The end points were overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), local control, regional lymph node control, and distant control. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias in the 2 groups. RESULTS The matched cohort consisted of 59 patients who underwent lobectomy and 59 patients who underwent PT with a median follow-up period of 50 months. There were no significant differences in OS (P = .26), cause-specific survival (P = .33), RFS (P = .53), local control (P = .41), regional lymph node control (P = .98), and distant control (P = .31). In the lobectomy and PT groups, the 5-year OS rate was 85.8% and 79.1%, respectively, the RFS rate was 82.3% and 77.8%, and the local control rate was 92.1% and 96.6%. CONCLUSIONS We found no difference in survival or disease control between lobectomy and PT in patients with histologically confirmed clinical stage I NSCLC. Despite these findings, the potential for unmeasured confounding factors remains, and randomized control trials are needed to better compare these treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadashi Sakane
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
| | - Koichiro Nakajima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Nakano
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Emi Hagui
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masanosuke Oguri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kento Nomura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukiko Hattori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Haneda
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lindberg S, Grozman V, Karlsson K, Onjukka E, Lindbäck E, Jirf KA, Lax I, Wersäll P, Persson GF, Josipovic M, Khalil AA, Møller DS, Hoffmann L, Knap MM, Nyman J, Drugge N, Bergström P, Olofsson J, Rogg LV, Hagen RK, Frøland AS, Ramberg C, Kristiansen C, Jeppesen SS, Nielsen TB, Lödén B, Rosenbrand HO, Engelholm S, Haraldsson A, Billiet C, Lewensohn R, Lindberg K. Expanded HILUS Trial: A Pooled Analysis of Risk Factors for Toxicity From Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Central and Ultracentral Lung Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1222-1231. [PMID: 37423292 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors near the central airways implies high-grade toxic effects, as concluded from the HILUS trial. However, the small sample size and relatively few events limited the statistical power of the study. We therefore pooled data from the prospective HILUS trial with retrospective data from patients in the Nordic countries treated outside the prospective study to evaluate toxicity and risk factors for high-grade toxic effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS All patients were treated with 56 Gy in 8 fractions. Tumors within 2 cm of the trachea, the mainstem bronchi, the intermediate bronchus, or the lobar bronchi were included. The primary endpoint was toxicity, and the secondary endpoints were local control and overall survival. Clinical and dosimetric risk factors were analyzed for treatment-related fatal toxicity in univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Of 230 patients evaluated, grade 5 toxicity developed in 30 patients (13%), of whom 20 patients had fatal bronchopulmonary bleeding. The multivariable analysis revealed tumor compression of the tracheobronchial tree and maximum dose to the mainstem or intermediate bronchus as significant risk factors for grade 5 bleeding and grade 5 toxicity. The 3-year local control and overall survival rates were 84% (95% CI, 80%-90%) and 40% (95% CI, 34%-47%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Tumor compression of the tracheobronchial tree and high maximum dose to the mainstem or intermediate bronchus increase the risk of fatal toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy in 8 fractions for central lung tumors. Similar dose constraints should be applied to the intermediate bronchus as to the mainstem bronchi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Lindberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Vitali Grozman
- Section of Thoracic Radiology, Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristin Karlsson
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Onjukka
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elias Lindbäck
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karam Al Jirf
- Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Lax
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Wersäll
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gitte Fredberg Persson
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Azza Ahmed Khalil
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ditte Sloth Møller
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lone Hoffmann
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Marianne Marquard Knap
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jan Nyman
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ninni Drugge
- Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Bergström
- Department of Oncology, Northern Sweden University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jörgen Olofsson
- Department of Oncology, Northern Sweden University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Christina Ramberg
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Charlotte Kristiansen
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Stefan Starup Jeppesen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tine Bjørn Nielsen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Britta Lödén
- Oncology Department, Central Hospital in Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden
| | | | - Silke Engelholm
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - André Haraldsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Charlotte Billiet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Rolf Lewensohn
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karin Lindberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Malatesta T, Scaggion A, Giglioli FR, Belmonte G, Casale M, Colleoni P, Falco MD, Giuliano A, Linsalata S, Marino C, Moretti E, Richetto V, Sardo A, Russo S, Mancosu P. Patient specific quality assurance in SBRT: a systematic review of measurement-based methods. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:21TR01. [PMID: 37625437 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf43a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
This topical review focuses on Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) approaches to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT requires stricter accuracy than standard radiation therapy due to the high dose per fraction and the limited number of fractions. The review considered various PSQA methods reported in 36 articles between 01/2010 and 07/2022 for SBRT treatment. In particular comparison among devices and devices designed for SBRT, sensitivity and resolution, verification methodology, gamma analysis were specifically considered. The review identified a list of essential data needed to reproduce the results in other clinics, highlighted the partial miss of data reported in scientific papers, and formulated recommendations for successful implementation of a PSQA protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziana Malatesta
- Medical Physics Unit, Department of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology and Radiology, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina-Gemelli Isola Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scaggion
- Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Gina Belmonte
- Medical Physics Department, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | - Michelina Casale
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera 'Santa Maria', Terni, Italy
| | - Paolo Colleoni
- UOC Medical Physics Unit-ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Maria Daniela Falco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 'SS. Annunziata' Hospital, 'G. D'Annunzio' University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Alessia Giuliano
- Medical Physics Unit, Pisa University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana', Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefania Linsalata
- Medical Physics Unit, Pisa University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana', Pisa, Italy
| | - Carmelo Marino
- Medical Physics and Radioprotection Unit, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco (CT), Italy
| | - Eugenia Moretti
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, ASUFC Udine, Italy
| | - Veronica Richetto
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Anna Sardo
- UOSD Medical Physics, ASLCN2, Verduno, Italy
| | - Serenella Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano - Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu X, Chi A. Combining stereotactic body radiotherapy with immunotherapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1211815. [PMID: 37746276 PMCID: PMC10511897 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1211815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oligometastasis has been associated with better prognosis than widespread metastatic disease and may be curable by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). SBRT can stimulate immunogenic anti-tumor activity, which can be further augmented when combined with immunotherapy, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Thus, its combination with immunotherapy was recognized as a promising treatment option, especially in the metastatic setting. However, the most optimal approach to combine SBRT with immunotherapy remains controversial with early clinical evidence emerging. Here, we review the current clinical evidence supporting the combination of SBRT with immunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC. Also, we discuss the current controversies and areas for further exploration associated with this treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoli Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Alexander Chi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing, China
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Monjazeb AM, Daly ME, Luxardi G, Maverakis E, Merleev AA, Marusina AI, Borowsky A, Mirhadi A, Shiao SL, Beckett L, Chen S, Eastham D, Li T, Vick LV, McGee HM, Lara F, Garcia L, Morris LA, Canter RJ, Riess JW, Schalper KA, Murphy WJ, Kelly K. Atezolizumab plus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for medically inoperable patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional phase I trial. Nat Commun 2023; 14:5332. [PMID: 37658083 PMCID: PMC10474145 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40813-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a standard-of-care for medically-inoperable-early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One third of patients progress and chemotherapy is rarely used in this population. We questioned if addition of the immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) atezolizumab to standard-of-care SABR can improve outcomes. We initiated a multi-institutional single-arm phase I study (NCT02599454) enrolling twenty patients with the primary endpoint of maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary endpoints of safety and efficacy; and exploratory mechanistic correlatives. Treatment is well tolerated and full dose atezolizumab (1200 mg) is the MTD. Efficacy signals include early responses (after 2 cycles of ICI, before initiation of SABR) in 17% of patients. Biomarkers of functional adaptive immunity, including T cell activation in the tumor and response to ex-vivo stimulation by circulating T cells, are highly predictive of benefit. These results require validation and are being tested in a phase III randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amin Mirhadi
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | | | | | - Shuai Chen
- UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| | - David Eastham
- David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis AFB, Fairfield, CA, 93405, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Karen Kelly
- UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Denver, CO, 80202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stanic K, But-Hadzic J, Zagar J, Vrankar M. Local control and survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy of early-stage lung cancer patients in Slovenia. Radiol Oncol 2023; 57:389-396. [PMID: 37494591 PMCID: PMC10476907 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2023-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) precisely and non-invasively delivers ablative radiation dose to tumors in early-stage lung cancer patients who are not candidates for surgery or refuse it. The aim of research was to evaluate local control, overall survival (OS), local progression free survival (LPFS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS), disease free survival (DFS) and toxicity in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with SBRT in a single tertiary cancer centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated medical records and radiation treatment plan parameters of 228 tumors irradiated in 206 early-stage lung cancer patients between 2016 and 2021 at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. RESULTS After 25 months of median follow up, 68 of 206 (33%) patients died. Median OS was 46 months (CI 36-56), 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS were 87%, 74% and 62% and 5-year OS was 31%. A total of 45 disease progressions have been identified in 41 patients. Local progress only was noticed in 5 (2%) patients, systemic progress in 32 (16%) and combined systemic and local in 4 (2%) patients. Local control rate (LCR) at 1 year was 98%, at 2 and 3 years 96% and 95% at 5 years. The 1-, 2- and 3-year LPFS were 98%, 96% and 94%, respectively and 5-year LPFS was 82%. One, 2-, 3- and 5-year DFS were 89%, 81%, 72% and 49%, respectively. Among 28 toxicities recorded only one was Grade 4 (pneumonitis), all others were Grade 1 or 2. No differences in LCR, LPFS, DFS were found in univariate analysis comparing patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. For OS the only statistically significant difference was found in patients with more than 3 comorbidities compared to those with less comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS Early lung cancer treated with SBRT at single tertiary cancer centre showed that LCR, LPFS, DFS, DMFS and OS were comparable to published studies. Patients with many comorbidities had significantly worse overall survival compared to those with less comorbidities. No other significant differences by patient, tumor, or treatment characteristics were found for DMFS, LPFS, and DFS. Toxicity data confirmed that treatment was well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karmen Stanic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jasna But-Hadzic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jan Zagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Martina Vrankar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Oliver DE, Laborde JM, Singh DP, Milano MT, Videtic GM, Williams GR, LaRiviere MJ, Chan JW, Peters GW, Decker RH, Samson P, Robinson CG, Breen WG, Owen D, Tian S, Higgins KA, Almeldin D, Jabbour SK, Wang F, Grass GD, Perez BA, Dilling TJ, Strosberg J, Rosenberg SA. Early-Stage Primary Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Multi-Institution Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:849-857. [PMID: 36708788 PMCID: PMC10845843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current guidelines recommend surgery as standard of care for primary lung neuroendocrine tumor (LNET). Given that LNET is a rare clinical entity, there is a lack of literature regarding treatment of LNET with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We hypothesized that SBRT could lead to effective locoregional tumor control and long-term outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively reviewed 48 tumors in 46 patients from 11 institutions with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of LNET, treated with primary radiation therapy. Data were collected for patients treated nonoperatively with primary radiation therapy between 2006 and 2020. Patient records were reviewed for lesion characteristics and clinical risk factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox multivariate models were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS Median age at treatment was 71 years and mean tumor size was 2 cm. Thirty-two lesions were typical carcinoid histology, 7 were atypical, and 9 were indeterminate. The most common SBRT fractionation schedule was 50 to 60 Gy in 5 daily fractions. Overall survival at 3, 6, and 9 years was 64%, 43%, and 26%, respectively. Progression-free survival at 3, 6, and 9 years was 88%, 78%, and 78%, respectively. Local control at 3, 6, and 9 years was 97%, 91%, and 91%, respectively. There was 1 regional recurrence in a paraesophageal lymph node. No grade 3 or higher toxicity was identified. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series evaluating outcomes in patients with LNET treated with SBRT. This treatment is well tolerated, provides excellent locoregional control, and should be offered as an alternative to surgical resection for patients with early-stage LNET, particularly those who may not be ideal surgical candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose M Laborde
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Deepinder P Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Gregory M Videtic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Graeme R Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael J LaRiviere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason W Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Gabrielle W Peters
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Roy H Decker
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Pamela Samson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Clifford G Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sibo Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kristin A Higgins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Doaa Almeldin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Fen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | | | | | | | - Jonathan Strosberg
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Miki Y, Yamashita H, Nakajima J, Karasaki T, Kitano K, Katano A, Takenaka R, Ogita M, Sawayanagi S, Minamitani M, Jinnouchi H, Noyama T, Takeuchi K, Ishida A, Abe O. Retrospective comparison between definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy and radical surgery for 538 patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in a single institution. J Cancer Res Ther 2023; 19:1350-1355. [PMID: 37787307 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1873_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Survival information for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was examined. Methods Stage I NSCLC patients who underwent surgery or SBRT between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively enrolled in this single-institution study. Using the Kaplan--Meier method and Cox regression model, overall survival (OS) was estimated and compared. Results Among 538 enrolled patients, compared to the surgery group (443), the SBRT group (95) had more complications (P = 0.01), worse performance status (P = 0.001), and were older (P < 0.001). Three-year OS was 70.5% post SBRT and 90.1% postsurgery. The 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) post SBRT and postsurgery were 92.7% vs. 92.3% and 61.1% vs 79.3%, respectively. Three-year locoregional and distant control rates post SBRT and postsurgery were 85.6% vs. 90.1% and 82.5% vs. 86.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis using the Cox model, including age, T-stage, CCI, and C/T ratio and treatment, showed the surgery group's OS to be significantly superior to that of the SBRT group (HR of SBRT per surgery: 1.90, 95%CI: 1.12-3.21, P = 0.017). No significant differences were observed in rates of adverse events. Conclusion Although OS was better in the surgery group, no differences in CSS existed. This analysis suggests the need for future studies that compare specific radical surgeries and SBRT in a prospective and randomized setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Miki
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideomi Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Nakajima
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Karasaki
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Kitano
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsuto Katano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryousuke Takenaka
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mami Ogita
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Subaru Sawayanagi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanari Minamitani
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruka Jinnouchi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Noyama
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenta Takeuchi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aki Ishida
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Abe
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Carducci MP, Sundaram B, Greenberger BA, Werner-Wasik M, Kane GC. Predictors and characteristics of Rib fracture following SBRT for lung tumors. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:337. [PMID: 37046249 PMCID: PMC10100199 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10776-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasing for primary and secondary lung neoplasms. Despite encouraging results, SBRT is associated with an increased risk of osteoradionecrosis-induced rib fracture. We aimed to (1) evaluate potential clinical, demographic, and procedure-related risk factors for rib fractures and (2) describe the radiographic features of post-SBRT rib fractures. METHODS We retrospectively identified 106 patients who received SBRT between 2015 and 2018 for a primary or metastatic lung tumor with at least 12 months of follow up. Exclusion criteria were incomplete records, previous ipsilateral thoracic radiation, or relevant prior trauma. Computed tomography (CT) images were reviewed to identify and characterize rib fractures. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was employed to determine clinical, demographic, and procedural risk factors (e.g., age, sex, race, medical comorbidities, dosage, and tumor location). RESULTS A total of 106 patients with 111 treated tumors met the inclusion criteria, 35 (32%) of whom developed at least one fractured rib (60 total fractured ribs). The highest number of fractured ribs per patient was five. Multivariate regression identified posterolateral tumor location as the only independent risk factor for rib fracture. On CT, fractures showed discontinuity between healing edges in 77% of affected patients. CONCLUSIONS Nearly one third of patients receiving SBRT for lung tumors experienced rib fractures, 34% of whom experienced pain. Many patients developed multiple fractures. Post-SBRT fractures demonstrated a unique discontinuity between the healing edges of the rib, a distinct feature of post-SBRT rib fractures. The only independent predictor of rib fracture was tumor location along the posterolateral chest wall. Given its increasing frequency of use, describing the risk profile of SBRT is vital to ensure patient safety and adequately inform patient expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Carducci
- Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St, suite 840, 19107, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Baskaran Sundaram
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 South 10th St, Floor 10, 19107, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, 111 South 11th St Suite G-301, 19107, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maria Werner-Wasik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, 111 South 11th St Suite G-301, 19107, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gregory C Kane
- Department of Medicine, Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 834 Walnut St, Suite 650, 19107, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Regnery S, Katsigiannopulos E, Hoegen P, Weykamp F, Sandrini E, Held T, Deng M, Eichkorn T, Buchele C, Rippke C, Renkamp CK, König L, Lang K, Thomas M, Winter H, Adeberg S, Klüter S, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. To fly or not to fly: Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy effectively treats ultracentral lung tumors with favorable long-term outcomes. Lung Cancer 2023; 179:107175. [PMID: 36965207 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiotherapy of ultracentral lung tumors (ULT) is challenging as it may cause overdoses to sensitive mediastinal organs with severe complications. We aimed to describe long-term outcomes after stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) as an innovative treatment of ULT. PATIENTS & METHODS We analyzed 36 patients that received SMART to 40 tumors between 02/2020 - 08/2021 inside prospective databases. ULT were defined by planning target volume (PTV) overlap with the proximal bronchial tree or esophagus. We calculated Kaplan Meier estimates for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and competing risk estimates for the incidence of tumor progression and treatment-related toxicities. ULT patients (N = 16) were compared to non-ULT patients (N = 20). RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar between ULT and non-ULT, but ULT were larger (median PTV: ULT 54.7 cm3, non-ULT 19.2 cm3). Median follow-up was 23.6 months. ULT and non-ULT showed a similar OS (2-years: ULT 67%, non-ULT 60%, p = 0.7) and PFS (2-years: ULT 37%, non-ULT 34%, p = 0.73). Progressions occurred mainly at distant sites (2-year incidence of distant progression: ULT 63%, non-ULT 61%, p = 0.77), while local tumor control was favorable (2-year incidence of local progression: ULT 7%, non-ULT 0%, p = 0.22). Treatment of ULT led to significantly more toxicities ≥ grade (G) 2 (ULT: 9 (56%), non-ULT: 1 (5%), p = 0.002). Most toxicities were moderate (G2). Two ULT patients developed high-grade toxicities: 1) esophagitis G3 and bronchial bleeding G4 after VEGF treatment, 2) bronchial bleeding G3. Estimated incidence of high-grade toxicities was 19% (3-48%) in ULT, and no treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSION Our small series supports SMART as potentially effective treatment of ULT. SMART with careful fractionation could reduce severe complications, but treatment of ULT remains a high-risk procedure and needs careful benefit-risk-assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Efthimios Katsigiannopulos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hauke Winter
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Beddok A, Chabi-Charvillat ML, Kennel T, de Wolf J, Pricopi C, Crequit P, Girard N, Otz J, Vallée A, Longchampt E, Sage E, Glorion M. Prospective Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Macroscopic Volume and Microscopic Extension of Nonsolid Lung Nodules on Thin-section CT Images for Sublobar Resection and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Planning. Clin Lung Cancer 2023; 24:98-106. [PMID: 36509664 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to determine whether computed tomography (CT) could be a useful tool for nonsolid lung nodule (NSN) treatment planning, surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), by assessing the macroscopic and microscopic extension of these nodules. METHODS The study prospectively included 23 patients undergoing anatomic resection at the Foch Hospital in 2020/2021 for NSN with a ground-glass component of more than 50%. Firstly, for each patient, both the macroscopic dimensions of the NSN were assessed on CT and during pathologic analysis. Secondly, the microscopic extension was assessed during pathologic examination. Wilcoxon sign rank tests were used to compare these dimensions. Spearman correlation test and Bland-Altman analysis were used to evaluate the agreement between radiological and pathologic measurements. RESULTS On CT, the median largest diameter and volume of NSN were 21 mm and 3780 cc, while on pathologic analysis, they were 15 mm and 1800 cc, respectively. Therefore, the largest diameter and volume of the NSN were significantly higher on CT than on pathological analysis. For microscopic extension, the median largest diameter and volume of NSN were 17 mm and 2040 cc, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the macroscopic size and the microscopic extension assessed during pathologic analysis. Moreover, correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots showed that radiological and pathologic measurements could provide equivalent precision. CONCLUSION Our study showed that CT did not underestimate the macroscopic size and microscopic extension of NSN and confirmed that CT can be used for NSN treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, France; Laboratory of Translational Imaging in Oncology (LITO), Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm, Orsay, France.
| | | | - Titouan Kennel
- Department of Epidemiology-Data-Biostatistics, Delegation of Clinical Research and Innovation (DRCI), Foch hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - Julien de Wolf
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Ciprian Pricopi
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Perrine Crequit
- Department of Epidemiology-Data-Biostatistics, Delegation of Clinical Research and Innovation (DRCI), Foch hospital, Suresnes, France
| | | | - Joelle Otz
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Alexandre Vallée
- Department of Epidemiology-Data-Biostatistics, Delegation of Clinical Research and Innovation (DRCI), Foch hospital, Suresnes, France
| | | | - Edouard Sage
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gao SJ, Jin L, Meadows HW, Shafman TD, Gross CP, Yu JB, Aerts HJWL, Miccio JA, Stahl JM, Mak RH, Decker RH, Kann BH. Prediction of Distant Metastases After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early Stage NSCLC: Development and External Validation of a Multi-Institutional Model. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:339-349. [PMID: 36396062 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Distant metastases (DMs) are the primary driver of mortality for patients with early stage NSCLC receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), yet patient-level risk is difficult to predict. We developed and validated a model to predict individualized risk of DM in this population. METHODS We used a multi-institutional database of 1280 patients with cT1-3N0M0 NSCLC treated with SBRT from 2006 to 2015 for model development and internal validation. A Fine and Gray (FG) regression model was built to predict 1-year DM risk and compared with a random survival forests model. The higher performing model was evaluated on an external data set of 130 patients from a separate institution. Discriminatory performance was evaluated using the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). Calibration was assessed graphically and with Brier scores. RESULTS The FG model yielded an AUC of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.86) compared with the AUC of random survival forest at 0.69 (95% CI: 0.63-0.85) in the internal test set and was selected for further testing. On external validation, the FG model yielded an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.57-0.83) with good calibration (Brier score: 0.08). The model identified a high-risk patient subgroup with greater 1-year DM rates in the internal test (20.0% [3 of 15] versus 2.9% [7 of 241], p = 0.001) and external validation (21.4% [3 of 15] versus 7.8% [9 of 116], p = 0.095). A model nomogram and online application was made available. CONCLUSIONS We developed and externally validated a practical model that predicts DM risk in patients with NSCLC receiving SBRT which may help select patients for systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Gao
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lan Jin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Hugh W Meadows
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Cary P Gross
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Hugo J W L Aerts
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, CARIM & GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph A Miccio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
| | - John M Stahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Raymond H Mak
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Roy H Decker
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Benjamin H Kann
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Imasaka K, Isobe K, Hamanaka N, Kishi K. Fixation rate of fiducial gold markers in each segmental bronchus for stereotactic body radiotherapy. Respir Investig 2023; 61:190-199. [PMID: 36738651 DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy for lung tumors, placement of fiducials, such as a gold marker (GM), is necessary. However, transbronchially placed GMs often drop out spontaneously. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the fixation rate of GMs in each segmental bronchus. METHODS In this study, we examined the fixation rates of 791 GMs placed in 235 patients (259 procedures), from November 2011 to November 2020, at a single facility. The relationship between the elapsed time and the fixation rate was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Moreover, we measured the distance between the GM and the chest wall (DMC), as confirmed using planning computed tomography, and analyzed the relationship of this distance with the fixation rate. RESULTS Overall, 28.8% of GMs dropped out within 10 days of placement. The fixation rate of GMs in the bronchi was significantly lower in the upper lobe than in the other lobes, in both lungs (right, p < 0.01; left, p = 0.05). Moreover, in the left upper lobe, the fixation rate of GMs was significantly lower in B1+2 than in B3 (p = 0.0181). In addition, the group with a short DMC had a significantly higher GM fixation rate. (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The fixation rate of GMs was lower in the upper lobes than in the lower lobes. Additionally, the fixation rate was lower in B1+2 than in B3. Shorter DMCs were associated with higher GM fixation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Imasaka
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541 Japan; Department of Thoracic Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0012 Japan.
| | - Kazutoshi Isobe
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541 Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Hamanaka
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0012 Japan
| | - Kazuma Kishi
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Song X, Zhao L, Jiang N, Ding N, Zong D, Zhang N, Wang D, Wen J, He X, Kong C, Zhu X. Long-term outcomes in patients with central and ultracentral non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: single-institution experience. Curr Probl Cancer 2023; 47:100956. [DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
|
27
|
Alduais Y, Zhang H, Fan F, Chen J, Chen B. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A review of risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e32899. [PMID: 36827002 PMCID: PMC11309591 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most frequent subtype of lung cancer. Surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or molecularly targeted therapy is used to treat NSCLC. Nevertheless, many patients who accept surgery likely develop distant metastases or local recurrence. In recent years, targeted treatments and immunotherapy have achieved improvement at a breakneck pace. Therapy must be customized for each patient based on the specific medical condition, as well as other variables. It is critical to have an accurate NSCLC sub-classification for tailored treatment, according to the latest World Health Organization standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaser Alduais
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Haijun Zhang
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fan Fan
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Baoan Chen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kamima T, Iino M, Sakai R, Ito Y, Sakae T, Moriya S, Tokumasu K, Yoshioka Y. Evaluation of the four-dimensional motion of lung tumors during end-exhalation breath-hold conditions using volumetric cine computed tomography images. Radiother Oncol 2023; 182:109573. [PMID: 36822360 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study was performed to evaluate the four-dimensional motion of lung tumors during end-exhalation (EE) breath-holding (BH) using cine computed tomography (CT) and investigate the correlation between tumor and surrogate marker motions. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included 28 patients who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy at our institution and were capable of 15-20 s of EE BH within a ±1.5-mm gating window with external markers. During EE BH with cine CT, 21 s of continuous data were acquired using 320-row multislice CT. Displacements in the tumor position during EE BH were assessed in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between tumor motions during EE BH and diaphragm/external marker motions was also determined. RESULTS The mean absolute maximum displacements of the tumor position during EE BH were 1.3 (range: 0.2-4.0), 1.9 (range: 0.3-12.0), and 1.3 (range: 0.1-7.2) mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. The displacement of the tumor position in the AP direction was weakly correlated (|r| < 0.4) with the external marker and diaphragm displacements in many cases (proportions of 50% and 46%, respectively). CONCLUSION We found some cases showing substantial displacement in lung tumor positions during EE BH, especially in the AP direction. Because these tumor position displacements did not correlate with surrogate markers and were difficult to detect, we recommend pretreatment evaluation of the four-dimensional motions of tumors during BH using cine CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Kamima
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
| | - Misae Iino
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Ryohei Sakai
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yasushi Ito
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takeji Sakae
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Moriya
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kenji Tokumasu
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yasuo Yoshioka
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eisenberg M, Deboever N, Antonoff MB. Salvage surgery in lung cancer following definitive therapies. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:319-328. [PMID: 36630094 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Salvage surgery refers to operative resection of persistent or recurrent disease in patients initially treated with intention-to-cure nonoperative management. In non-small-cell lung cancer, salvage surgery may be effective in treating selected patients with locally progressive tumors, recurrent local or locoregional disease, or local complications after nonoperative therapy. Importantly, those patients who may be candidates for salvage surgery are evolving, in terms of disease stage as well as the types of attempted definitive therapy received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Eisenberg
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nathaniel Deboever
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mara B Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Isolated Nodal Recurrence After Definitive Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e35-e44. [PMID: 35858658 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) results in high rates of primary tumor control for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For patients with isolated hilar or mediastinal nodal recurrence (INR) after SABR, the optimal salvage treatment strategy is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of INR after SABR for early-stage NSCLC and to describe patterns of care and treatment outcomes after salvage therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective cohort study included 342 patients with stage T1-3N0M0 NSCLC treated with definitive SABR from 2003 to 2018. We evaluated the incidence of INR and baseline factors between patients who did and did not experience INR. Among patients who experienced INR, we described treatment patterns and outcomes including overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from the time of nodal failure using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the 3-year INR rate was 10.6% (95% CI, 6.6%-13.4%). Among the 34 patients experiencing INR, the 3-year rates of OS and PFS were 39.3% (24.4%-63.3%) and 26.7% (14.1%-0.3%), respectively. The 34 patients with INR were treated with radiation therapy alone (26.7%), concurrent chemoradiation therapy (43.3%), chemotherapy alone (13.3%), or observation (16.7%). Patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy had the best survival outcomes, with a 3-year OS and PFS of 81.5% (61.1%-100.0%) and 63.9% (40.7%-100.0%), respectively. Of the patients treated with salvage radiation therapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy, 14.3% experienced grade 3 toxic effects, and no patients had grade ≥4 toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS In this study, INR occurred in approximately 10% of patients treated with SABR for early-stage NSCLC. The highest rates of OS and PFS among patients with INR were observed in those treated with salvage chemoradiation therapy.
Collapse
|
31
|
Li F, Jiang H, Bu M, Mu X, Zhao H. Dose-effect relationship of stereotactic body radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:211. [PMID: 36564845 PMCID: PMC9789627 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02183-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish the dose effect relationship between the dose parameters of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the local tumor control rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Web of Science and the Cochrane databases to determine the articles treated with SBRT in early-stage NSCLC. Original studies with complete prescription dose information, tumor local control rate and other important parameters were screened and reported. Probit model in XLSTAT 2016 was used for regression analysis, and P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level. RESULTS After literature screening, 22 eligible studies were included in probit model regression analysis, involving 1861 patients. There is no significant dose effect relationship between nominal BED10 and peripheral BED10 versus 3 years local control probability. There were significant dose effect relationships between the center BED10 and the average BED10 versus the 3 years local control probability, with P values are 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively. According to the results of this model, the 3 years local control rate of 90.5% (87.5-92.1%) and 89.5% (86.7-91.0%) can be expected at the center BED10 of 180 Gy or the average BED10 of 140 Gy, prospectively. CONCLUSIONS For NSCLC treated with SBRT, more attention should be paid to the central dose and average dose of PTV. A set of clear definition in the dose prescription should be established to ensure the effectiveness and comparability of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Li
- grid.415954.80000 0004 1771 3349Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126, Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033 Jilin People’s Republic of China
| | - Hairong Jiang
- Department of Geriatrics, Jilin City Hospital of Chemical Industry, Jilin, 130022 Jilin People’s Republic of China
| | - Mingwei Bu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guowen Medical Corporation Changchun Hospital, Changchun, 130028 Jilin People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin Mu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jilin City Hospital of Chemical Industry, Jilin, 130022 Jilin People’s Republic of China
| | - Hongfu Zhao
- grid.415954.80000 0004 1771 3349Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126, Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033 Jilin People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy compared with video‐assisted thoracic surgery after propensity‐score matching in elderly patients with pathologically‐proven early‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer. PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/pro6.1175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
|
33
|
Wang Q, Stone K, Kern JA, Slatore CG, Swanson S, Blackstock W, Khan RS, Smith CB, Veluswamy RR, Chidel M, Wisnivesky JP. Adverse Events Following Limited Resection versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Lung Cancer. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19:2053-2061. [PMID: 35816617 PMCID: PMC9743482 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202203-275oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Approximately a quarter of patients with early stage lung cancer are not medically fit for lobectomy. Limited resection and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have emerged as alternatives for these patients. Given the equipoise on the effectiveness of the two treatments, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) could have a significant impact on patients' decision-making and treatment outcomes. Objectives: To compare the AE profile between SBRT versus limited resection. Methods: Data were derived from a prospective cohort of patients with stage I-IIA non-small cell lung cancer who were deemed as high-risk for lobectomy recruited from five centers across the United States. Propensity scores and inverse probability weighting were used to compare the rates of 30- and 90-day AEs among patients treated with limited resection versus SBRT. Results: Overall, 65% of 252 patients underwent SBRT. After adjusting for propensity scores, there was no significant difference in developing at least one AE comparing SBRT to limited resection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.55 and OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.84-1.91 at 30 and 90 days, respectively). SBRT was associated with lower risk of infectious AEs than limited resection at 30 days (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.39) and 90 days posttreatment (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.98). Additionally, SBRT was associated with persistently elevated risk of fatigue (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.34-4.54 at 30 days and OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.52-4.77 at 90 days, respectively), but significantly lower risks of respiratory AEs (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.20-0.65 and OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31-0.86 at 30 and 90 days, respectively). Conclusions: Though equivalent in developing at least one AE, we found that SBRT is associated with less toxicity than limited resection in terms of infectious and respiratory AEs but higher rates of fatigue that persisted up to 3 months posttreatment. This information, combined with data about oncologic effectiveness, can help patients' decision-making regarding these alternative therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeffrey A. Kern
- Division of Oncology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
| | - Christopher G. Slatore
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care and
- Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Scott Swanson
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William Blackstock
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina; and
| | | | | | | | - Mark Chidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorado Permanente Medical Group, Denver, Colorado
| | - Juan P. Wisnivesky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, and
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kashiwabara K, Fujii S, Tsumura S, Sakamoto K. Prognosis of stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients aged ≥ 80 years who were considered medically operable but received best supportive care alone. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 33:100642. [PMID: 36174378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Some elderly stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients may refuse both stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgery and may instead desire best supportive care (BSC) alone, despite having a medically operable condition. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the differences in the 3-year overall survival (3-year OS) rates among elderly stage I NSCLC patients aged ≥ 80 years who received surgery (OP group, n = 39), SBRT (RT group, n = 32) or BSC alone (BSC group, n = 28), stratifying the later groups according to those who were medically inoperable (MI subgroup) and those who were considered medically operable but refused surgery (MO subgroup). RESULTS During a median 39.1-month follow-up period, 44 patients died. The 3-year OS rates were longer and higher in the MI-RT subgroup and the OP group than in the MI-BSC subgroup (67%, 89%, and 22%, respectively; p = 0.001). No differences in the 3-year OS rates were seen among the MO-RT subgroup, the MO-BSC subgroup, and the OP group (75%, 70%, and 89%, respectively; p = 0.164). However, a multivariate analysis identified a performance status (PS) score of 1-2 or a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score of ≥2, as well as stage IB disease and BSC, as independently increasing the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS Elderly stage I NSCLC patients who were medically operable but who refused surgery and desire BSC alone should be encouraged to undergo SBRT unless they have a good PS and are otherwise in healthy condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Kashiwabara
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kumamoto Regional Medical Center, 5-16-10 Hon-jo, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan.
| | - Shinji Fujii
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kumamoto Regional Medical Center, 5-16-10 Hon-jo, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Tsumura
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kumamoto Regional Medical Center, 5-16-10 Hon-jo, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Sakamoto
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kumamoto Regional Medical Center, 5-16-10 Hon-jo, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kang HJ, Kwak YK, Kim M, Lee SJ. Application of real-time MRI-guided linear accelerator in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: one step forward to precise targeting. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 148:3215-3223. [PMID: 36040666 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04264-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor motion is a major challenge in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), causing excessive irradiation to compensate for this motion. Real-time tumor tracking with a magnetic resonance imaging-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) could address this problem. This study aimed to assess the effects and advantages of MR-Linac in SABR for the treatment of lung tumors. METHODS Overall, 41 patients with NSCLC treated with SABR using MR-Linac between March 2019 and December 2021 were included. For comparison, 40 patients treated with SABR using computed tomography-based modalities were also enrolled. The SABR dose ranged from 48 to 60 Gy in 3-5 fractions. The primary endpoint was a lower radiation volume compared to CT-based SABR. The secondary endpoint was the local control rate of SABR using the MR-Linac. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 19 months (range: 3-105 months). There was no significant difference in the gross tumor volume between the MR and CT groups (7.1 ± 9.3 cm3 vs 8.0 ± 6.8 cm3, p = 0.643), but the planning target volume was significantly smaller in the MR group (20.8 ± 18.8 cm3 vs 34.1 ± 22.9 cm3, p = 0.005). The 1-year local control rates for the MR and CT groups were 92.1 and 75.4%, respectively (p = 0.07), and the 1-year overall survival rates were 87.4 and 87.0%, respectively (p = 0.30). CONCLUSION Lung SABR with MR-Linac can reduce the radiation field without compromising the local control rate. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Jin Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 21431, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo-Kang Kwak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 21431, Republic of Korea.
| | - Myungsoo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 21431, Republic of Korea
| | - So Jung Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 21431, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Clinical Outcomes Following Proton and Photon Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174152. [PMID: 36077688 PMCID: PMC9454659 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The current study reports the clinical outcomes of proton and photon stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer. Out of 202 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 34 received proton SBRT and 168 received photon SBRT. Patients at high risk of developing post-SBRT radiation pneumonitis tended to receive proton SBRT. Oncologic outcomes and toxicity profiles were comparable between treatment modalities. Proton SBRT could be considered for patients with high risk of radiation pneumonitis. Abstract We aimed to report the clinical outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using photon or proton equipment in early-stage lung cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 202 cT1-2N0M0 lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT with 60 Gy in four consecutive fractions between 2010 and 2019 at our institution: 168 photon SBRT and 34 proton SBRT. Patients who underwent proton SBRT had relatively poor baseline lung condition compared to those who underwent photon SBRT. Clinical outcomes were comparable between treatment modalities: 5-year local control (90.8% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.602); progression-free survival (61.6% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.370); overall survival (51.7% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.475); and cause-specific survival (70.3% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.618). There was no statistically significant difference in grade ≥ 2 toxicities: radiation pneumonitis (19.6% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.371); musculoskeletal (13.7% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.264); and skin (3.6% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.604). In the binary logistic regression analysis of grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis, poor performance status and poor baseline diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide were significant. To summarize, though patients with high risk of developing lung toxicity underwent proton SBRT more frequently, the SBRT techniques resulted in comparable oncologic outcomes with similar toxicity profiles. Proton SBRT could be considered for patients at high risk of radiation pneumonitis.
Collapse
|
37
|
Chen S, Qiao Y, Chen J, Li Y, Xie J, Cui P, Huang Z, Huang D, Gao Y, Hu Y, Liu Z. Evolutions in the management of non-small cell lung cancer: A bibliometric study from the 100 most impactful articles in the field. Front Oncol 2022; 12:939838. [PMID: 36059661 PMCID: PMC9428518 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.939838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The study was designed to explore the evolution of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management in the last 20 years. Methods The top 100 most-cited papers on NSCLC treatment were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. R and VOSviewer were used to extract bibliographic information, including the year of publication, countries/regions, institutions, authors, journals, keywords, impact factor, and total citations. The topic and type of papers were checked independently by authors. Bibliometric analysis was conducted and visualized with R, CiteSpace, Excel and VOSviewer to identify output dynamics, research forces, topics, hotspots, and frontiers in the field. Results The average citation of each retrieved top 100 most-cited NSCLC management papers was 1,725 (range: 615-7,340). Fifty-seven corresponding authors were from the United States. This country contributed the most papers (n=76), followed by Germany (n=34), France (n=33), and South Korea (n=32). The top contributors were Paz-Ares L. (n=12) and Reck M. (n=12). The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center published the largest number of papers (n=20). There were two significant citation paths, indicating publications in medicine/medical/clinical journals primarily cited journals in molecular/biology/genetics fields, partly cited health/nursing/medicine fields. Top-cited papers mainly came from the New England Journal of Medicine (n=33, citations=80,427), followed closely by the Journal of Clinical Oncology (n=28, citations=32,408). “Chemotherapy” (n=36) was the keyword with the greatest frequency of co-occurrence. “Open-label” was the keyword with the strongest burst strength (=4.01), followed by “nivolumab” (=3.85), “blockade” (=2.86), and “efficacy” (=2.85). Conclusions The United States as a nation and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center as an institute contributed the most to this field. The New England Journal of Medicine is the most eye-catching journal. Hotspots of NSCLC management have almost undergone an evolution from chemotherapy and radiotherapy to targeted therapy to immunotherapy. Molecular/biological/genetic fields become the main research base for NSCLC treatment. Immunotherapy and combination therapy are research frontiers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyuan Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Qiao
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China
| | - Juan Chen
- School of Nursing, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Yanan Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Jianlian Xie
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Pengfei Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Ziwei Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Di Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Yiming Gao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zhefeng Liu, ; Yi Hu,
| | - Zhefeng Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zhefeng Liu, ; Yi Hu,
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yang H, Wang L, Shao G, Dong B, Wang F, Wei Y, Li P, Chen H, Chen W, Zheng Y, He Y, Zhao Y, Du X, Sun X, Wang Z, Wang Y, Zhou X, Lai X, Feng W, Shen L, Qiu G, Ji Y, Chen J, Jiang Y, Liu J, Zeng J, Wang C, Zhao Q, Yang X, Hu X, Ma H, Chen Q, Chen M, Jiang H, Xu Y. A combined predictive model based on radiomics features and clinical factors for disease progression in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:967360. [PMID: 35982975 PMCID: PMC9380646 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.967360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To accurately assess disease progression after Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) of early-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), a combined predictive model based on pre-treatment CT radiomics features and clinical factors was established. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 96 patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SABR. Clinical factors included general information (e.g. gender, age, KPS, Charlson score, lung function, smoking status), pre-treatment lesion status (e.g. diameter, location, pathological type, T stage), radiation parameters (biological effective dose, BED), the type of peritumoral radiation-induced lung injury (RILI). Independent risk factors were screened by logistic regression analysis. Radiomics features were extracted from pre-treatment CT. The minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) were adopted for the dimensionality reduction and feature selection. According to the weight coefficient of the features, the Radscore was calculated, and the radiomics model was constructed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to establish the combined model based on radiomics features and clinical factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, DeLong test, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model’s diagnostic efficiency and clinical practicability. Results With the median follow-up of 59.1 months, 29 patients developed progression and 67 remained good controlled within two years. Among the clinical factors, the type of peritumoral RILI was the only independent risk factor for progression (P< 0.05). Eleven features were selected from 1781 features to construct a radiomics model. For predicting disease progression after SABR, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of training and validation cohorts in the radiomics model was 0.88 (95%CI 0.80-0.96) and 0.80 (95%CI 0.62-0.98), and AUC of training and validation cohorts in the combined model were 0.88 (95%CI 0.81-0.96) and 0.81 (95%CI 0.62-0.99). Both the radiomics and the combined models have good prediction efficiency in the training and validation cohorts. Still, DeLong test shows that there is no difference between them. Conclusions Compared with the clinical model, the radiomics model and the combined model can better predict the disease progression of early-stage NSCLC after SABR, which might contribute to individualized follow-up plans and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Yang
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lin Wang
- Shaoxing University School of Medicine, Shaoxing, China
| | - Guoliang Shao
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Baiqiang Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuguo Wei
- Precision Health Institution, General Electric (GE) Healthcare, Hangzhou, China
| | - Pu Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haiyan Chen
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wujie Chen
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yao Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yiwei He
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yankun Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xianghui Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaojiang Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuezhen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xia Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaojing Lai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liming Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guoqing Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yongling Ji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianxiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Youhua Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jinshi Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jian Zeng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Changchun Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xun Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Honglian Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qixun Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haitao Jiang
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Haitao Jiang, ; Yujin Xu,
| | - Yujin Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Haitao Jiang, ; Yujin Xu,
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sarudis S, Karlsson A, Nyman J, Bäck A. Dosimetric effects of respiratory motion during stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung tumors. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:1004-1011. [PMID: 35905048 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2092420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respiratory-induced lung tumor motion may affect the delivered dose in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Previous studies are often based on phantom studies for one specific treatment technique. In this study, the dosimetric effect of tumor motion was quantified in real patient geometries for different modulated treatments and tumor motion amplitudes for lung-SBRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A simulation method using deformable image registrations and 4-dimensional computed tomographies (4DCT) was developed to assess the dosimetric effects of tumor motion. The method was evaluated with ionization chamber and Gafchromic film measurements in a thorax phantom and used to simulate the effect for 15 patients with lung tumors moving 7.3-27.4 mm. Four treatment plans with different complexities were created for each patient and the motion-induced dosimetric effect to the gross tumor volume (GTV) was simulated. The difference between the planned dose to the static tumor and the simulated delivered dose to the moving tumor was quantified for the near minimum (D98%), near maximum (D2%) and mean dose (Dmean) to the GTV as well as the largest observed local difference within the GTV (Maxdiff). RESULTS No correlation was found between the dose differences and the tumor motion amplitude or plan complexity. However, the largest deviations were observed for tumors moving >15.0 mm. The simulated delivered dose was within 2.5% from the planned dose for D98% (tumors moving <15 mm) and within 3.3% (tumors moving >15 mm). The corresponding values were 1.7% vs. 6.4% (D2%); 1.7% vs. 2.4% (Dmean) and 8.9% vs. 35.2% (Maxdiff). Using less complex treatment techniques minimized Maxdiff for tumors moving >15.0 mm. CONCLUSION The dosimetric effects of respiratory-induced motion during lung SBRT are patient and plan specific. The magnitude of the dosimetric effect cannot be assessed solely based upon tumor motion amplitude or plan complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Sarudis
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Medical Physics, County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Anna Karlsson
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Nyman
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Bäck
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Suh YG, Noh JM, Lee DY, Kim TH, Bayasgalan U, Pyo H, Moon SH. Proton Beam Therapy versus Photon Radiotherapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153627. [PMID: 35892885 PMCID: PMC9329768 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SABR) is accepted as a standard of care for patients who are not candidates for surgery in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SABR has shown encouraging disease control and acceptable toxicity in peripherally located stage I NSCLC. However, for centrally located tumors around the proximal bronchial tree or for tumors located close to the chest wall, toxicities by SABR are not negligible. Therefore, proton beam therapy (PBT), which provides better organ at risk (OAR) sparing than photon radiotherapy by the Bragg peak, was tested and investigated to reduce radiation-induced toxicities in stage I NSCLC. Here, we compared 112 and 117 stage I NSCLC patients who underwent PBT and photon radiotherapy, respectively. PBT showed significantly lower lung and heart radiation exposure than photon radiotherapy without worsening disease control. PBT could be an effective treatment to reduce long-term toxicities of the lung and heart. Abstract Proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were compared in terms of clinical outcomes and dosimetry. Data were obtained from patients who underwent PBT or photon radiotherapy at two institutions—the only two facilities where PBT is available in the Republic of Korea. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score-matched analyses were used to compare local progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival and radiation exposure to the lungs were compared in the matched population. Of 289 patients included in the analyses, 112 and 177 underwent PBT and photon radiotherapy, respectively. With a median follow-up duration of 27 months, the 2-year local PFS and OS rates were 94.0% and 83.0%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, a biologically effective dose (BED10, using α/β = 10 Gy) of ≥125 cobalt gray equivalents was significantly associated with improved local PFS and OS. In the matched analyses, the local PFS and OS did not differ between groups. However, PBT showed significantly lower lung and heart radiation exposure in the mean dose, V5, and V10 than photon radiotherapy. PBT significantly reduced radiation exposure to the heart and lungs without worsening disease control in stage I NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang-Gun Suh
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
| | - Jae Myoung Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea;
| | - Doo Yeul Lee
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
| | - Unurjargal Bayasgalan
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, Ulaanbaatar 13370, Mongolia
| | - Hongryull Pyo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea;
- Correspondence: (H.P.); (S.H.M.)
| | - Sung Ho Moon
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
- Correspondence: (H.P.); (S.H.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wei Z, Peng X, He L, Wang J, Liu Z, Xiao J. Treatment plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using either 6- or 10-MV photon energies. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13714. [PMID: 35808973 PMCID: PMC9359046 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to dosimetrically compare volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques using either 6‐ or 10‐MV photon beam energies in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans. Methods Thirty patients with primary or metastatic lung tumors eligible for SBRT were randomly selected. VMAT and IMRT treatment plans using either 6‐ or 10‐MV photon energies were generated through automatic SBRT planning software in the RayStation treatment planning system. Results For planning target volume, there was no difference in D95% for all plans, whereas D2% and D50% were significantly increased by 5.22%–5.98% and 2.47%–2.59%, respectively, using VMAT6/10‐MV plans compared to IMRT6/10‐MV plans. When comparing the Dmax of organs at risk (OARs), VMAT6/10‐MV was 18.32%–47.95% lower than IMRT6/10‐MV for almost all OARs. VMAT6/10‐MV obviously decreased Dmean, V5Gy, V10Gy, and V20Gy of whole lung by 9.68%–20.92% than IMRT6/10‐MV. Similar results were found when comparing VMAT6‐MV with IMRT10‐MV or VMAT10‐MV with IMRT6‐MV. The differences in the D2%, heterogeneity index, and conformity index between 6‐ and 10‐MV plans are not statistically significant. Plans using 6‐MV performed 4.68%–8.91% lower levels of Dmax of spinal cord, esophagus, great vessels, and trachea and proximal bronchial tree than those using 10‐MV plans. Similarly, Dmean, V5Gy, V10Gy, and V20Gy of whole lung were also reduced by 2.79%–5.25% using 6‐MV. For dose fall‐off analysis, the D2cm and R50% of VMAT6/10‐MV were lower than those of IMRT6/10‐MV. Dose fall‐off curve based on 10 rings was steeper for VMAT plans than IMRT plans regardless of the energy used. Conclusions For lung SBRT plans, VMAT‐based plans significantly reduced OARs dose and steepened dose fall‐off curves compared to IMRT‐based plans. A 6‐MV energy level was a better choice than 10‐MV for lung SBRT. In addition, the dose differences between different techniques were more obvious than those between different energy levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhigong Wei
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xingchen Peng
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ling He
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jingjing Wang
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zheran Liu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jianghong Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
FLT-PET/CT in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy- A Pilot study. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:101037. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
43
|
Rationale for Combing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Medically Inoperable Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133144. [PMID: 35804917 PMCID: PMC9264861 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The rate of recurrence remains high for lymph node negative early-stage non-small cell lung cancer that are over 2–3 cm in size following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This is due to the increased incidence of out-of-field failures, which warrants the addition of systemic therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a class of immunotherapy, may induce a strong distant therapeutic effect known as the “abscopal” effect. This makes them a very suitable class of drugs to be combined with SBRT when treating early lung cancer with high-risk features, such as larger tumor size. In this review, we discuss the rationale and evidence for doing so. Abstract Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been widely adopted as an alternative to lobar resection in medically inoperable patients with lymph-node negative (N0) early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Excellent in-field local control has been consistently achieved with SBRT in ES NSCLC ≤ 3 cm in size. However, the out-of-field control following SBRT remains suboptimal. The rate of recurrence, especially distant recurrence remains high for larger tumors. Additional systemic therapy is warranted in N0 ES NSCLC that is larger in size. Radiation has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects on cancer, which is most prominent with higher fractional doses. Strong synergistic effects are observed when immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are combined with radiation doses in SBRT’s dose range. Unlike chemotherapy, ICIs can potentiate a strong systemic response outside of the irradiated field when combined with SBRT. Together with their less toxic nature, ICIs represent a very suitable class of systemic agents to be combined with SBRT when treating ES NSCLC with high-risk features, such as larger tumor size. In this review, we describe the rationale and emerging evidence, as well as ongoing investigations in this area.
Collapse
|
44
|
Wolf C, Harkenrider M, Stang K, Wesolowski M, Alite F. Development of Radiographic Radiation Pneumonitis (RP) in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) May Be Protective Against Further Disease Progression. Cureus 2022; 14:e25994. [PMID: 35859984 PMCID: PMC9288130 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a local inflammatory response, and we hypothesize that RP serves as an immune stimulator and is a protective factor against disease progression. Methods: We analyzed patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) at two institutions. Radiographic RP (RRP) was evaluated and maximal axial dimensions were measured at three-, six-, and twelve-month timepoints with surveillance CT. RRP was measured using radiographic markers such as ground-glass opacities and airspace consolidation. Disease recurrence was evaluated and categorized as local, regional, and distant. Results: Seventy-seven unique patient records were randomly selected from the database, 72 patients (93.5%) had RRP and five patients (6.5%) did not. The median follow-up was 24.3 months (IQR: 12.0 - 41.9). Disease failure occurred in 28.6% of patients with 6.5% local only, 2.6% regional only, 7.8% distant only, and 11.7% with multiple recurrences. Patients with RRP demonstrated a lower rate of disease failure with 25.0% of those with RRP experiencing disease failure and 80% of those without RRP experiencing disease failure (p=0.02). Patients with RRP had a 71% reduced risk of disease recurrence, compared to patients with no RRP, after adjusting for maximum tumor dimension (HR 0.29, p = 0.05). Among patients with RRP, there was no significant difference in recurrence based on extent of RRP (maximal area of RRP on CT). RRP did not correlate with overall survival. Discussion: Most patients who received SBRT had RRP, and this study suggests that it may be protective of cancer recurrence. These results are hypothesis-generating and will need to be validated in larger and independent datasets.
Collapse
|
45
|
Pneumonitis after Stereotactic Thoracic Radioimmunotherapy with Checkpoint Inhibitors: Exploration of the Dose-Volume-Effect Correlation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122948. [PMID: 35740613 PMCID: PMC9221463 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is widely applied for treatment of early stage lung cancer and pulmonary metastases. Modern immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is progressively used in cancer treatment. Pneumonitis is a relevant side effect of both thoracic SBRT and ICB. Currently, it remains unclear whether we can presume the same radiation dose–volume–effect correlations and dose constraints for safe application of SBRT + ICB. We present a dose–volume–effect correlation analysis method using pneumonitis contours and dose–volume histograms (DVH). We showed dosimetric differences for pneumonitis volumes between SBRT + ICB and SBRT alone. We found a large extent of pneumonitis, even bilateral and apart from the radiation field for combined SBRT + ICB. We noticed a shift in pneumonitis DVHs towards lower doses and a trend towards decreased areas under the curve (AUC) for SBRT + ICB. This provides a direction for re-evaluation and potential adaptation of lung dose constraints for combined SBRT and ICB. Abstract Thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is extensively used in combination with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). While current evidence suggests that the occurrence of pneumonitis as a side effect of both treatments is not enhanced for the combination, the dose–volume correlation remains unclear. We investigate dose–volume–effect correlations for pneumonitis after combined SBRT + ICB. We analyzed patient clinical characteristics and dosimetric data for 42 data sets for thoracic SBRT with ICB treatment (13) and without (29). Dose volumes were converted into 2 Gy equivalent doses (EQD2), allowing for dosimetric comparison of different fractionation regimes. Pneumonitis volumes were delineated and corresponding DVHs were analyzed. We noticed a shift towards lower doses for combined SBRT + ICB treatment, supported by a trend of smaller areas under the curve (AUC) for SBRT+ ICB (median AUC 1337.37 vs. 5799.10, p = 0.317). We present a DVH-based dose–volume–effect correlation method and observed large pneumonitis volumes, even with bilateral extent in the SBRT + ICB group. We conclude that further studies using this method with enhanced statistical power are needed to clarify whether adjustments of the radiation dose constraints are required to better estimate risks of pneumonitis after the combination of SBRT and ICB.
Collapse
|
46
|
Katz LM, Ng V, Wu SP, Yan S, Grew D, Shin S, Colangelo NW, McCarthy A, Pass HI, Chachoua A, Schiff PB. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience. Front Oncol 2022; 12:870143. [PMID: 35686111 PMCID: PMC9170989 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.870143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease. Methods Single-institution retrospective analysis of 60 NSCLC patients with 62 discrete lesions treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2017. Patients were stratified into three groups, including early stage, locally recurrent, and oligoprogressive disease. Group 1 included early stage local disease with no prior local therapy. Group 2 included locally recurrent disease after local treatment of a primary lesion, and group 3 included regional or well-controlled distant metastatic disease receiving SBRT for a treatment naive lung lesion (oligoprogressive disease). Patient/tumor characteristics and adverse effects were recorded. Local failure free survival (LFFS), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results At median follow-up of 34 months, 67% of the study population remained alive. The estimated 3-year LFFS for group 1, group 2, and group 3 patients was 95% (95% CI: 86%-100%), 82%(62% - 100%), and 83% (58-100%), respectively. The estimated 3-year PFS was 59% (42-83%), 40% (21%-78%), and 33% (12%-95%), and the estimated 3-year OS was 58% (41-82%), 60% (37-96%), and 58% (31-100%)), respectively for each group. When adjusted for age and size of lesion, no significant difference in OS, LFFS, and PFS emerged between groups (p > 0.05). No patients experienced grade 3 to 5 toxicity. Eighteen patients (29%) experienced grade 1 to 2 toxicity. The most common toxicities reported were cough and fatigue. Conclusions Our data demonstrates control rates in group 1 patients comparable to historical controls. Our study also reveals comparable clinical results for SBRT in the treatment of NSCLC by demonstrating similar rates of LFFS and OS in group 2 and group 3 patients with locally recurrent and treatment naïve lung lesion with well-controlled distant metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah M Katz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Victor Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - S Peter Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sherry Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - David Grew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Samuel Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nicholas W Colangelo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Allison McCarthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Harvey I Pass
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Abraham Chachoua
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Peter B Schiff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Viani GA, Gouveia AG, Yan M, Matsuura FK, Moraes FY. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis involving 29,511 patients included in comparative studies. JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA : PUBLICACAO OFICIAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE PNEUMOLOGIA E TISILOGIA 2022; 48:e20210390. [PMID: 35508065 PMCID: PMC9064643 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by means of a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, searches were performed on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies. The meta-analysis compared the hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses evaluated the association of extent of surgical resection, study publication year, tumor staging, propensity score matching, proportion of chemotherapy use, and proportion of pathological lymph node involvement with CSS and OS. Results: Thirty studies involving 29,511 patients were included (surgery group: 17,146 patients and SBRT group: 12,365 patients). There was a significant difference in favor of surgery vs. SBRT in the 3-year OS (HR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.22-1.44; I2 = 66%) and 3-year CSS (HR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.09-1.37; I2 = 17%), but not in the 3-year LC (HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.93-1.08; I2 = 19%). In the subgroup analysis for OS, no significant difference between surgery and SBRT groups was observed in the T1N0M0 subgroup (HR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.95-1.68; I2 = 0%). In subgroup analysis for CSS, no significant difference was detected between the sublobar resection subgroup and the SBRT group (HR = 1.21; 95% CI: 0.96-1.53; I2 = 16%). Conclusions: Surgery generally resulted in better 3-year OS and CSS than did SBRT; however, publication bias and heterogeneity may have influenced these findings. In contrast, SBRT produced LC results similar to those of surgery regardless of the extent of surgical resection. These findings may have important clinical implications for patients with comorbidities, advanced age, poor pulmonary reserve, and other factors that may contraindicate surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Arruda Viani
- . Departamento de Imagens Médicas, Oncologia e Hematologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP) Brasil
| | - André Guimarães Gouveia
- . Departamento de Radioterapia, Américas Centro de Oncologia Integrado, Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil
| | - Michael Yan
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston (ON) Canada
| | - Fernando Konjo Matsuura
- . Departamento de Imagens Médicas, Oncologia e Hematologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP) Brasil
| | - Fabio Ynoe Moraes
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston (ON) Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Teke ME, Sarvestani AL, Hernandez JM, Fernando HC, Timmerman RD. A Randomized, Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection (SR) Versus Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SAbR) in High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:4686-4687. [PMID: 35524087 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11584-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martha E Teke
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, NationalInstitutesofHealth, Building 10, Room 4-3740, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Amber Leila Sarvestani
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, NationalInstitutesofHealth, Building 10, Room 4-3740, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hernandez
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, NationalInstitutesofHealth, Building 10, Room 4-3740, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| | - Hiran C Fernando
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert D Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Rd., Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Matsuo Y, Hiraoka M, Karasawa K, Kokubo M, Sakamoto T, Mukumoto N, Nakamura M, Morita S, Mizowaki T. Multi-institutional phase II study on the safety and efficacy of dynamic tumor tracking-stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:18-22. [PMID: 35513131 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dynamic tumor tracking-stereotactic body radiotherapy (DTT-SBRT) for lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with cStage I primary lung cancer or metastatic lung cancer with an expected range of respiratory motion of ≥10 mm were eligible for the study. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in four fractions. A gimbal-mounted linac was used for DTT-SBRT delivery. The primary endpoint was local control at 2 years. RESULTS Forty-eight patients from four institutions were enrolled in this study. Forty-two patients had primary non-small-cell lung cancer, and six had metastatic lung tumors. DTT-SBRT was delivered for 47 lesions in 47 patients with a median treatment time of 28 min per fraction. The median respiratory motion during the treatment was 13.7 mm (range: 4.5-28.1 mm). The motion-encompassing method was applied for the one remaining patient due to the poor correlation between the abdominal wall and tumor movement. The median follow-up period was 32.3 months, and the local control at 2 years was 95.2% (lower limit of the one-sided 85% confidence interval [CI]: 90.3%). The overall survival and progression-free survival at 2 years were 79.2% (95% CI: 64.7%-88.2%) and 75.0% (95% CI: 60.2%-85.0%), respectively. Grade 3 toxicity was observed in one patient (2.1%) with radiation pneumonitis. Grade 4 or 5 toxicity was not observed. CONCLUSION DTT-SBRT achieved excellent local control with low incidences of severe toxicities in lung tumors with respiratory motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Hiraoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Karasawa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Kokubo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takashi Sakamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mukumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoshi Morita
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Huang W, Deng HY, Xu K, Lin MY, Li P, Yuan C, Zhou Q. Initial treatment of early-stage small-sized non-small cell lung cancer for octogenarians: a population-based study. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1461-1470. [PMID: 35386041 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01281-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The objectives of this study is to figure out the appropriate initial treatment and criteria for clinical decision for early-stage small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among octogenarians. Elderly patients (≥80 years) with stage I NSCLC (<3 cm) were identified between 2004 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were divided into four cohorts regarding treatment modalities, and overall survival and cancer-specific survival were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard model. The propensity score matching method was introduced in the subgroup analysis stratified by four clinical characteristics to identify the preferable treatment. A total of 7861 patients were included with a median overall survival of 43 months (range 1-155 months). In younger patients (80-85 years), lobectomy was superior in improving the survival (versus segmentectomy, HR = 0.68, 95%CI 0.55-0.84; versus wedge resection, HR = 0.77; 95%CI 0.67-0.88). While in those over 85 years, lobectomy was superior to wedge resection (HR = 0.72; 95%CI 0.53-0.98), and all other treatments were comparable. As stratified by T stage in those over 85 years, lobectomy was superior to wedge resection (P = 0.023) for T1 disease, and the four treatments were all comparable in overall survival for T2 disease. In conclusions, the favored treatment of early stage NSCLC for octogenarians may be evaluated by age and T stage. Lobectomy might be preferred in patients between 80 and 85 years whenever possible. Among those over 85 years, radiotherapy might lead to a comparable prognosis and could be recommended as the prior treatment, while should surgery be recommended, lobectomy might be preferred for T1 disease and wedge resection for T2 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijia Huang
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Han-Yu Deng
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Kai Xu
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming-Ying Lin
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Peiwei Li
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Chi Yuan
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Qinghua Zhou
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|