Implications of neurovascular uncoupling in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of brain tumors

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) serves as a critical tool for presurgical mapping of eloquent cortex and changes in neurological function in patients diagnosed with brain tumors. However, the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) contrast mechanism underlying fMRI assumes that neurovascular coupling remains intact during brain tumor progression, and that measured changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) are correlated with neuronal function. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that even low-grade brain tumors can exhibit neurovascular uncoupling (NVU), which can confound interpretation of fMRI data. Therefore, to avoid neurosurgical complications, it is crucial to understand the biophysical basis of NVU and its impact on fMRI. Here we review the physiology of the neurovascular unit, how it is remodeled, and functionally altered by brain cancer cells. We first discuss the latest findings about the components of the neurovascular unit. Next, we synthesize results from preclinical and clinical studies to illustrate how brain tumor induced NVU affects fMRI data interpretation. We examine advances in functional imaging methods that permit the clinical evaluation of brain tumors with NVU. Finally, we discuss how the suppression of anomalous tumor blood vessel formation with antiangiogenic therapies can "normalize" the brain tumor vasculature, and potentially restore neurovascular coupling.

Cediranib: profile of a novel anti-angiogenic agent in patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment strategies targeting angiogenesis have revealed promising results in preclinical studies and early clinical trials in patients with glioblastomas.

OBJECTIVE

This review evaluates the preclinical and clinical data for cediranib (AZD2171), a potent oral inhibitor of the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase.

METHODS

We summarize both preclinical and clinical data for cediranib, with a focus on the treatment of glioblastomas.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Cediranib is an effective drug in patients with glioblastoma, acting through inhibition of angiogenesis and normalization of tumor vasculature. Reduction of vasogenic brain edema is a key component of its treatment effect in this patient population. The primary side effects of cediranib include fatigue, diarrhea and hypertension.

Antiangiogenic therapy in malignant gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiangiogenic drugs are increasingly used in malignant glioma therapy. This article reviews the rationale for targeting angiogenesis in malignant gliomas, summarizes relevant clinical trial results, and discusses promising avenues of investigation in antiangiogenic therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination therapy with bevacizumab, the humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, and irinotecan has emerged as the treatment of choice for recurrent malignant gliomas, prolonging progression-free survival markedly in comparison with historical controls. Several small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor are under investigation and show promise as well.

SUMMARY

Antiangiogenic treatments are effective and well tolerated options for recurrent malignant glioma. Future studies will determine whether these drugs have a role in first line therapy. Studies are in progress to elucidate mechanisms of resistance and suggest approaches to further improve survival in patients with these challenging tumors.

Emerging antiangiogenic treatments for gliomas - efficacy and safety issues

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the rationale and recent experience of angiogenesis inhibitors in malignant gliomas and to highlight both the promise and potential complications of these agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several new agents targeting angiogenesis in malignant gliomas have become available and have been increasingly used to complement conventional chemotherapy. Specifically, bevacizumab, often in combination with irinotecan, has demonstrated favorable results in achieving significant radiographic responses and in prolonging progression-free survival in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

SUMMARY

Antiangiogenic drugs have been shown to have promising activity in recurrent malignant gliomas. Investigation of novel antiangiogenic compounds and future clinical trials will determine whether these drugs have a role in first-line therapy. This article reviews the rationale for targeting angiogenesis in malignant brain tumors and summarizes the results of recent clinical trials. In addition, this review will outline potential toxicities associated with angiogenesis inhibition in an attempt to provide practical guidance to physicians treating patients with malignant gliomas.

Localized BCNU chemotherapy and the multimodal management of malignant glioma

BACKGROUND

Gliomas account for 42% of all primary CNS neoplasms and 77% of all malignant primary CNS neoplasms. Unfortunately the high-grade variant of gliomas, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), is difficult to treat and generally considered incurable. Survival rates are generally poor, and neurological morbidity in the setting of disease progression is high. Fortunately, significant progress has been achieved in the past decade in our understanding of the molecular biology of this aggressive tumour histology and, as a consequence, there is renewed clinical trial activity in this area focused on improving quality of life, treatment-related morbidity and outcomes.

METHODS

A review of literature from June 2005 to June 2008 was conducted on multimodal treatment of malignant glioma (MG) patients, using specific search criteria in Medline, EMBASE, and BIOSIS. Abstracts from relevant US and European medical (cancer) meetings were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The established therapies for MG include surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and local or systemic chemotherapy. However, over the last 10 years only two chemotherapeutic agents have received regulatory approval for treatment of MG: polifeprosan 20 with carmustine (BCNU implant) and temozolomide (TMZ), an imidazotetrazine derivative of dacarbazine. More recent advances in the treatment of brain tumours have been in the development of multimodal approaches. Specific interest in the combination of BCNU implant and TMZ has arisen due to the demonstrable depletion by TMZ of the DNA repair enzyme responsible for resistance to a nitrosourea such as BCNU. Further interest in this combination stems from the observation that there is a difference in the time to peak effect for each agent. Additional emerging data suggest that multimodal therapy with maximal resection and BCNU implants, followed by adjuvant therapy with radiation and TMZ, is effective and well-tolerated in patients with initial high-grade, resectable MG.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing body of efficacy data suggests that this combination of BCNU implants and TMZ within a multimodal treatment strategy including surgery and RT may provide an enhanced benefit compared with the use of either of these agents alone in select patients with high-grade glioma.

An exploratory survival analysis of anti-angiogenic therapy for recurrent malignant glioma

Recent clinical trial results suggest that anti-angiogenic therapy may be effective against recurrent malignant glioma. Though these treatments prolong progression-free survival, the extent to which they prolong overall survival is unknown. We pooled data from 34 patients treated at a single institution on phase II clinical trials of bevacizumab and cediranib, and we compared these data to 18 patients treated on clinical trials of cytotoxic chemotherapies. In univariate and multivariate analyses, treatment group was a significant predictor of progression-free but not overall survival. Median progression-free survival was 8 vs. 22 weeks in patients treated with cytotoxic as compared to anti-angiogenic therapy (P = 0.01). Median overall survival was nearly identical in the two groups (39 vs. 37 weeks). The results of this exploratory analysis suggest that anti-angiogenic therapy may fail to prolong overall survival in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. If this conclusion proves correct, progression-free survival may be an inappropriate endpoint for phase II trials of anti-angiogenic therapies.