Prolonged Response to Cytoreductive Surgery and Sunitinib in an Elderly Patient with Synchronous Multiple Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma

One third of patients with renal cell cancer have metastatic disease at diagnosis. Until now the outcome of these patients has been poor due to the variable natural history of the disease and the lack of effective therapy. Multitargeted therapy of advanced renal cell cancer appears to be a better option than immunotherapy. We report the case of an elderly patient with skin, lung, bone and brain metastases and widespread intraabdominal disease treated with cytoreductive surgery and sunitinib, resulting in a prolonged response.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy and its role in the present-day period of targeted therapy

The beneficial effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the immunotherapy era was based on two prospective randomized trials. Unfortunately, such evidence does not yet exist in the present-day period of targeted therapy. Despite this, cytoreductive nephrectomy remains integral in the multimodal management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Multiple retrospective studies as well as data from prospective studies examining targeted therapy support the continued use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the properly selected patient. Ongoing studies will hopefully fine-tune the role and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the context of targeted therapy.

Final results from the large sunitinib global expanded-access trial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We report final results with extended follow-up from a global, expanded-access trial that pre-regulatory approval provided sunitinib to metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, ineligible for registration-directed trials.

METHODS

Patients ⩾18 years received oral sunitinib 50 mg per day on a 4-weeks-on-2-weeks-off schedule. Safety was assessed regularly. Tumour measurements were scheduled per local practice.

RESULTS

A total of 4543 patients received sunitinib. Median treatment duration and follow-up were 7.5 and 13.6 months. Objective response rate was 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 15-17). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.4 months (95% CI: 8.8-10.0) and 18.7 months (95% CI: 17.5-19.5). Median PFS in subgroups of interest: aged ⩾65 years (33%), 10.1 months; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ⩾2 (14%), 3.5 months; non-clear cell histology (12%), 6.0 months; and brain metastases (7%), 5.3 months. OS was strongly associated with the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model (n=4065). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (10%), fatigue (9%), and asthenia, neutropenia, and hand-foot syndrome (each 7%).

CONCLUSION

Final analysis of the sunitinib expanded-access trial provided a good opportunity to evaluate the long-term side effects of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used worldwide in mRCC. Efficacy and safety findings were consistent with previous results.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy: past, present and future

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is an integral part of the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Improved survival has been shown with CN and IFN-α. The introduction of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma has raised important questions regarding the role of CN. The majority of patients who were enrolled in the Phase III studies of targeted therapies had undergone prior nephrectomy. Thus, the benefit of these agents has largely been demonstrated in a nephrectomized population. CARMENA and SURTIME, important Phase III studies examining the role and timing of CN, are ongoing. Until new evidence is available, CN is a reasonable approach in selected patients with a resectable primary tumor and good performance status.

Experience with sunitinib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Following approval of the oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib malate for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Europe and the USA in 2006, the agent has had a substantial impact on the treatment landscape in this setting. Sunitinib is now recommended in international treatment guidelines for the first-line treatment of favourable- or intermediate-risk mRCC and as an alternative option in poor-risk mRCC. In the 6 years since the approval of sunitinib, the range of agents available for the treatment of mRCC has expanded substantially, and this, together with a number of additional therapies in late-stage development, has increased the treatment options available to patients. Results from a phase III trial and a global expanded access study have provided robust data to support the efficacy of sunitinib in mRCC, including in real-world populations. Data also suggest a significant quality of life benefit with sunitinib, with superior patient-reported outcomes observed with this agent compared with interferon-α therapy. Both clinical and real-world study data also support the safety profile of sunitinib; most treatment-associated adverse events are mild to moderate in severity and can be managed effectively with close monitoring and proactive management. Clinical experience with sunitinib has demonstrated that therapy management, involving optimal dosing, maximum treatment duration and prompt and effective adverse event management, supports optimal patient outcomes with sunitinib. In this review we discuss clinical experience with sunitinib in mRCC, with an emphasis on real-world data, and utilize clinical case studies to examine the successful implementation of therapy management strategies for optimal patient outcomes. An increasing body of evidence suggests that side effects associated with sunitinib therapy, including hypertension, hand-foot syndrome and hypothyroidism, may represent effective markers of treatment response, and these will also be discussed.

Integration of surgery and systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma

Proper integration of surgery and systemic therapy is essential for improving outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). There is no current role for adjuvant therapy after nephrectomy for clinically localized disease. The potential benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced nonmetastatic disease are in need of further study. In metastatic disease, the proper integration of cytoreductive surgery and systemic therapy remains to be elucidated. Presurgical targeted therapy is feasible and may be beneficial. Pending the results of randomized controlled trials, upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy in appropriate patients will likely continue as the paradigm of choice in metastatic RCC.

Advances in renal cell carcinoma treatment

The treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma has been completely changed by the development of new therapeutic modalities during the past 3 years. In this time period six targeted agents have been approved for the treatment of advanced or metastatic disease. Phase 3 data support the use of sunitinib, bevacizumab plus interferon-α and pazopanib for patients with low and intermediate risk of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. In the pivotal study of temsirolimus a significant longer overall survival compared with interferon-α in high-risk disease including non-clear-cell histology was observed. Patients pretreated with cytokines will benefit from sorafenib and pazopanib while everolimus has been shown to increase significantly progression-free survival after previous anti-angiogenesis therapy. In addition to these phase 3 data-based recommendations, several other factors have to be considered for treatment selection, for example, side effect profile and patients' comorbidities. Currently, the sequential use of the available targeted drugs and adjuvant treatment are the subject of ongoing clinical trials. However, medical treatment of renal cell carcinoma remains palliative and surgery remains the only curative approach in patients with localized, locally advanced and limited metastatic disease.

[Progress and summary of recent congress: ASCO-GU, EAU, AUA, ASCO about the medical management of locally advanced or metastatic kidney cancer]

During the recent congress of urology and oncology key topics discussed were the evolution of survival data in metastatic kidney cancer which median is now around 40 months, persistent questions about the role of nephrectomy, including access to the systemic treatment of nephrectomized patients and tumor resectability induced by systemic therapies, the emergence of new prognostic models which are adapted to new therapeutic standards, and the emergence of promising new drugs including pazopanib. This article describes these advances.

Present state of target therapy for disseminated renal cell carcinoma

Both experimental and clinical researches focusing on advanced kidney cancer have increased continuously since the successful introduction of targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Being refractory to conventional hormone therapy, chemotherapy or radiotherapy, renal cell carcinoma has become a model tumor for the development and evaluation of diverse novel targeted drugs. This review highlights currently available agents and summarizes evidence-based data regarding their effectiveness in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, the role of debulking tumor nephrectomy followed by systemic therapy as part of an optimum treatment algorithm is being elucidated.

[Systemic therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: from many options to the therapeutic strategy]

In the last 5 years the paradigms for the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer have fundamentally changed. Until 2005 systemic therapy was limited to the immunomodulating cytokines interferon-alfa and interleukin-2, in recent years, however, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTor inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies have been established for this therapeutic situation. Without validated predictive biomarkers it is currently not possible to select patients who are likely to benefit from a certain therapy. Therefore, most current guidelines stratify the patients into risk groups according to the MSKCC risk score. The resulting treatment algorithm for first-line therapy is limited to these new drugs within all risk groups. Since approval for more tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors is currently awaited, the number of treatment options will expand further in the near future. The present paper reviews the present study data and aims to provide practical advice for the treatment of patients suffering from metastatic renal cell cancer.