Nilotinib for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia

The introduction of targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The pivotal role of the Philadelphia chromosome, resulting from the breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (BCR-ABL) translocation, led to the development of imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with significant activity against the BCR-ABL oncoprotein. Unprecedented clinical activity in CML led to rapid approval and established first-line therapy with imatinib mesylate as the standard of care in most patients. However, the occurrence of imatinib resistance or intolerance has sparked the development of newer drugs with increased activity or specificity. Nilotinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been rationally designed on the basis of imatinib. An overview is given on clinical results in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients that led to its current approval as second-line therapy for the chronic and accelerated phases of CML. Future studies will address the role of nilotinib as first-line therapy, in combination strategies and in the context of specific BCR-ABL mutations.

Nilotinib

Therapy with imatinib mesylate is a standard of care for most patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, resistance or intolerance to imatinib develops in a considerable number of patients leading to relapse or discontinuation of treatment. Nilotinib is a rationally designed second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with improved affinity and specificity against the BCR-ABL kinase, when compared with imatinib. Considerable efficacy after imatinib failure has been demonstrated in clinical trials leading to nilotinib's current approval as second-line therapy for CML in chronic and accelerated phase (AP). The role of nilotinib as first-line treatment for CML, in combinatorial strategies and in the context of specific BCR-ABL mutations, requires future studies.

Class effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), offering patients several targeted therapeutic options that provide the possibility of sustained remissions and prolonged survival. With the availability of imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib, physicians must weigh the efficacy and safety profile of each agent when choosing the best therapeutic option for individual patients. Each agent targets tyrosine kinases within the cell uniquely to cause the desired antiproliferative effect. In addition to inhibiting the BCR-ABL kinase, imatinib and nilotinib target the same array of other tyrosine kinases, including c-KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), albeit with differing potencies. While targeting BCR-ABL with the highest potency among approved agents in CML, dasatinib also targets a broad array of off-target kinases, including SRC family members, PDGFR and EPHB4. The differences in kinase inhibition profiles among these agents in vitro probably account for the differing clinical safety profiles of these agents. This paper reviews the various kinases inhibited by imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib, and describes the potential impact of kinase inhibition on the efficacy and safety of each agent.

Management of the advanced phases of chronic myelogenous leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Imatinib has revolutionised the management of chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Unfortunately it has had less of an impact on the management of the advanced phases of CML. These historically difficult-to-treat phases of disease remain largely resistant to therapy. Even when responses are obtained with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, they are brief, particularly in blast phase (BP) disease. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only curative option for these patients and should be considered early as an integral part of the treatment plan. But transplant outcomes are dependent on cytogenetic and gross disease burden at the time of transplant. This review will compare and contrast the various tyrosine kinase- and non-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based treatments for accelerated and BP CML before allogeneic transplantation.