Imatinib adherence prediction using machine learning approach in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to imatinib is common in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), which is associated with poor prognosis and financial burden. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the adherence rate in patients with GIST and subsequently develop a model based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to identify the associated factors and predict the risk of imatinib nonadherence.

METHODS

All eligible patients completed four sections of questionnaires. After the data set was preprocessed, statistically significance variables were identified and further processed to modeling. Six ML and four DL algorithms were applied for modeling, including eXtreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), categorical boosting, random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural network, multilayer perceptron, NaiveBayes, TabNet, and Wide&Deep. The optimal ML model was used to identify potential factors for predicting adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 397 GIST patients were recruited. Nonadherence was observed in 185 patients (53.4%). LGBM exhibited superior performance, achieving a mean f1_score of 0.65 and standard deviation of 0.12. The predominant indicators for nonadherent prediction of imatinib were cognitive functioning, whether to perform therapeutic drug monitoring (if_TDM), global health status score, social support, and gender.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first real-world investigation using ML techniques to predict risk factors associated with imatinib nonadherence in patients with GIST. By highlighting the potential factors and identifying high-risk patients, the multidisciplinary medical team can devise targeted strategies to effectively address the daily challenges of treatment adherence.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancers: Treatment optimization - Part II

Real-life populations are more heterogeneous than those included in prospective clinical studies. In cancer patients, comorbidities and co-medications favor the appearance of severe adverse effects which can significantly impact quality of life and treatment effectiveness. Most of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have been developed with flat oral dosing exposing patients to the risk of poor adherence due to side effects. Additionally, genetic or physiological factors, differences in diet, and drug-drug interactions can lead to inter-individual variability affecting treatment outcomes and increasing the risk of adverse events. Knowledge of the different factors of variability allows individualized patient management. This review examines the effects of adherence, food intake, and pharmaceutical form on the pharmacokinetics of oral TKI, as well as evaluating pharmacokinetics considerations improving TKI management. Concentration-effectiveness and concentration-toxicity data are presented for the selected TKI, and a simple therapeutic drug monitoring schema is outlined to help individualize dosing of oral TKI.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib - how far are we in the leukemia setting?

INTRODUCTION

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized survival rates of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and replaced hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (hSCT) as the key treatment option for these patients. More recently, the so-called Philadelphia chromosome-like (Ph-like) ALL has similarly benefitted from TKIs. However, many patients shift from the first generation TKI, imatinib, due to treatment-related toxicities or lack of treatment efficacy. A more personalized approach to TKI treatment could counteract these challenges and potentially be more cost-effective. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has led to higher response rates and less treatment-related toxicity in adult CML but is rarely used in ALL or in childhood CML.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes different antileukemic treatment indications for TKIs with focus on imatinib and its pharmacokinetic/-dynamic properties as well as opportunities and pitfalls of TDM for imatinib treatment in relation to pharmacogenetics and co-medication for pediatric and adult Ph+/Ph-like leukemias.

EXPERT OPINION

TDM of imatinib adds value to standard monitoring of ABL-class leukemia by uncovering non-adherence and potentially mitigating adverse effects. Clinically implementable pharmacokinetic/-dynamic models adjusted for relevant pharmacogenetics could improve individual dosing. Prospective trials of TDM-based treatments, including both children and adults, are needed.

Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical treatment is recommended for the majority of localised GIST, while systemic treatment is the cornerstone of management for metastatic or unresectable disease. While a three-year regimen of imatinib is the standard of care in the adjuvant setting, there is no precise recommendation for the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, where imatinib is usually given between 4 and 12 months. Continuous treatment with imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once per day is recommended for most patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST in the first line. An exception is represented by patients with tumours harbouring the imatinib-insensitive PDGFRA D842V mutation who would be better treated with avapritinib. Targeted therapies are also recommended in the presence of NTRK rearrangements and BRAF mutations, although limited data are available. While an increase in the dose of imatinib to 800 mg is an option for the second line, sunitinib is usually considered the standard of care. Similar outcomes were reported for ripretinib in patients with tumours harbouring KIT exon 11 mutation, with significantly fewer side effects. Regorafenib and ripretinib are the standards of care in the third and fourth lines, respectively. The recent development of various systemic treatment options allows for a more personalised approach based on the molecular profile of the GIST, patient characteristics, and the profile of medications' adverse events. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount since combining systemic treatment with locoregional treatment options and supportive care is vital for long-term survival.

Surgical Management of Germline Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common human sarcoma and usually results from a sporadic mutation in KIT or, less frequently, platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA). Rarely, a germline mutation in the KIT, PDGFRA, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), or neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) gene is responsible for GIST. These tumors are found in the stomach (PDGFRA and SDH), small bowel (NF1), or a combination of both (KIT). There is a need to improve care for these patients regarding genetic testing, screening, and surveillance. Since most GISTs due to a germline mutation do not respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the role of surgery is critical, especially when considering germline gastric GIST. However, in contrast to the established recommendation for prophylactic total gastrectomy in cadherin 1 (CDH1) mutation carriers once they reach adulthood, there are no formal guidelines as to the timing or extent of surgical resection for patients who are either carriers of a germline GIST mutation causing gastric GIST or have already developed gastric GIST(s). Surgeons must balance treating what is often multicentric, yet initially indolent disease with the chance of cure and the complications associated with total gastrectomy. Here, we consider the major issues in performing surgery in patients with germline GIST and illustrate the principles with a previously unreported patient harboring a germline KIT 579 deletion.

Prediction for Plasma Trough Concentration and Optimal Dosing of Imatinib under Multiple Clinical Situations Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling

(1) Purpose: This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the trough concentration (C _trough) of imatinib (IMA) at steady state in patients and to explore the role of free concentration (f _up), α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) level, and organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) activity/expression in clinical efficacy. (2) Methods: The population PBPK model was built using physicochemical and biochemical properties, metabolizing and transporting kinetics, tissue distribution, and human physiological parameters. (3) Results: The PBPK model successfully predicted the C _trough of IMA administered alone in chronic phase (CP) and accelerated phase (AP) patients, the C _trough of IMA co-administered with six modulators, and C _trough in CP patients with hepatic impairment. Most of the ratios between predicted and observed data are within 0.70-1.30. Additionally, the recommendations for dosing adjustments for IMA have been given under multiple clinical uses. The sensitivity analysis showed that exploring the f _up and AGP level had a significant influence on the plasma C _trough of IMA. Meanwhile, the simulations also revealed that OCT1 activity and expression had a significant impact on the intracellular C _trough of IMA. (4) Conclusion: The current PBPK model can accurately predict the IMA C _trough and provide appropriate dosing adjustment recommendations in a variety of clinical situations.

Plasma trough concentration of imatinib and its effect on therapeutic efficacy and adverse events in Japanese patients with GIST

BACKGROUND

Imatinib mesylate (IM) is the standard chemotherapy for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and has a favorable safety profile. Pharmacokinetics (PK), such as plasma trough concentration (Cmin), varies among patients, requiring the need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during IM administration. Despite some reports from overseas, the relationship between Cmin, adverse events (AEs), and treatment efficacy in Japanese patients with GIST has still been lacking. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between IM plasma concentration and AEs in Japanese patients with GISTs.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the data of 83 patients who underwent IM treatment for GISTs at our institution between May 2002 and September 2021.

RESULTS

The IM Cmin was associated with any grade of AEs (with AEs vs. without AEs = 1294 (260-4075) vs. 857 (163-1886) ng/mL, P < 0.001), edema (with edema vs. without edema = 1278 (634-4075) vs. 1036 (163-4069) ng/mL, P = 0.017), and fatigue (with fatigue vs. without fatigue = 1373 (634-4069) vs. 1046 (163-4075) ng/mL, P = 0.044). Moreover, a Cmin ≥ 1283 ng/mL was a risk factor for severe AEs. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.04 years in the lowest Cmin tertile (T1, < 917 ng/mL) compared with 5.90 years for T2 and T3 (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Edema and fatigue are potentially associated with IM plasma trough concentrations of ≥ 1283 ng/mL in Japanese patients with GISTs. Further, maintaining an IM plasma trough concentration above 917 ng/mL may improve PFS.

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Non-Metastatic Gastric GISTs

Surgical resection with negative margins of non-metastatic gastric GISTs is considered the main therapeutic option in GISTs treatment. Neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib is associated with higher response rates in advanced GISTs. We reported 34 patients with non-metastatic gastric GISTs who underwent partial gastrectomy at the Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt, after receiving a daily dose of 400 mg of imatinib as a neoadjuvant treatment in the period between October 2012 and January 2021. Twenty-two cases underwent open partial gastrectomy, and twelve cases had a laparoscopic partial gastrectomy. The median tumor size at diagnosis was 13.5 cm (range 9-26 cm) and the duration of neoadjuvant therapy was 10.91 months (range 4-12 months). Thirty-three patients had a partial response, while one patient showed progression of the disease on neoadjuvant treatment. Adjuvant therapy was conducted in 29 (85.3%) cases. Complications of neoadjuvant treatment were reported in seven cases in the form of gastritis, bleeding per rectum, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and edema lower limbs. The disease-free survival (DFS) in this study was 34.53 months, and the overall survival (OS) was 37 months. Recurrence developed in two cases, gastric and peritoneal recurrence (25 and 48 months from the initial diagnosis, respectively). We have concluded that neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib for non-metastatic gastric GISTs is a safe and effective method for tumor downsizing and devitalization to allow minimally invasive and/or organ sparing surgery. Moreover, it decreases the risk of intraoperative tumor rupture and relapse, thus improving the oncological outcome of such tumors.

SPK1/S1P axis confers gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) resistance of imatinib

BACKGROUND

Imatinib mesylate (IM) is highly effective in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the most of GISTs patients develop secondary drug resistance after 1-3 years of IM treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the IM-resistance mechanism via the multi-scope combined with plasma concentration of IM, genetic polymorphisms and plasma sensitive metabolites.

METHODS

This study included a total of 40 GISTs patients who had been regularly treated and not treated with IM. The plasma samples were divided into three experiments, containing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), OCT1 genetic polymorphisms and non-targeted metabolomics. According to the data of above three experiments, the IM-resistant cell line, GIST-T1/IMR cells, was constructed for verification the IM-resistance mechanism.

RESULTS

The results of non-targeted metabolomics analysis suggested that the sphingophospholipid metabolic pathway including the SPK1/S1P axis was inferred in IM-insensitive patients with GISTs. A GIST cell line (GIST-T1) was immediately induced as an IM resistance cell model (GIST-T1/IMR) and we found that blocking the signal pathway of SPK1/S1P in the GIST-T1/IMR could sensitize treatment of IM and reverse the IM-resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that IM secondary resistance is associated with the elevation of S1P, and blockage the signaling pathway of SPK1/S1P warrants evaluation as a potential therapeutic strategy in IM-resistant GISTs. The design of this study from blood management, group information collection, IM plasma concentration with different elements, identification of sphingolipid metabolism and lastly verification the function of SPK1/S1P in the IM-resistance GISTs cells.

Changes in imatinib plasma trough level during long-term treatment in patients with intermediate- or high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Relationship between covariates and imatinib plasma trough level

Background

Imatinib is the first-line adjuvant treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Considering that some studies have suggested that imatinib (IM) plasma trough levels (C_min) change with time, the aim of this study is to assess the changes in IM C_min in patients with GIST in a long-term study and to elucidate the relationships between clinicopathological features and IM C_min.

Methods

In 204 patients with intermediate- or high-risk GIST who were taking IM, IM C_min was analyzed. Patient data were grouped according to the duration of medication (A: 1-3 months, B: 4-6 months, C: 7-9 months, D: 10-12 months, E: ≤12 months, F: 12<-≤36 months, G: >36 months). The correlation between IM C_min at different time stages and clinicopathological characteristics was assessed.

Results

Statistically significant differences were observed between Groups A, C, and D (P = 0.049 and 0.01, respectively). In Group E, IM C_min correlated with sex (P = 0.049) and age (P = 0.029) and negatively correlated with body weight, height, and body surface area (P = 0.007, 0.002, and 0.001, respectively). In Groups F and G, IM C_min was significantly higher in non-gastric operation patients than in patients with gastrectomy (P = 0.002, 0.036) and was significantly higher in patients with the primary sites of others than in the stomach (P < 0.001, = 0.012). In addition, IM C_min was much higher in patients with mutation sites other than KIT exon 11 in Group F (P = 0.011).

Conclusion

This is the first study of IM C_min during the long-term treatment of patients with intermediate- or high-risk GIST. IM C_min was the highest for the first 3 months and then declined, and long-term administration of IM showed a relatively stable plasma trough level. The IM C_min correlated with different clinical characteristics at different durations of medication. This meant that future "trough level-clinicopathological characteristics" analyses should be time-point-specific. We also need to formulate time-specific medication monitoring plans in clinical practice to study disease progression caused by the occurrence of drug resistance.

Relevance of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Routine Clinical Practice: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

The main goal of treatment in cancer patients is to achieve the highest therapeutic effectiveness with the least iatrogenic toxicity. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are anticancer oral agents, usually administered at fixed doses, which present high inter- and intra-individual variability due to their pharmacokinetic characteristics. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be used to optimize the use of several types of medication.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the use of TDM of TKIs in routine clinical practice through studying the variability in exposure to erlotinib, imatinib, lapatinib, and sorafenib and dose adjustment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analytical study involving patients who received treatment with TKIs, guided by TDM and with subsequent recommendation of dose adjustment. The quantification of the plasma levels of the different drugs was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Quirónsalud Torrevieja approved this study.

RESULTS

The inter-individual variability in the first cycle and in the last monitored cycle was 46.2% and 44.0% for erlotinib, 48.9 and 50.8% for imatinib, 60.7% and 56.0% for lapatinib and 89.7% and 72.5% for sorafenib. Relationships between exposure and baseline characteristics for erlotinib, imatinib, lapatinib and sorafenib were not statistically significant for any of the variables evaluated (weight, height, body surface area (BSA), age and sex). Relationships between height (p = 0.021) and BSA (p = 0.022) were statistically significant for sorafenib. No significant relationships were observed between C_trough and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) for any drug, except in the case of sunitinib (correlation between C_trough and PFS p = 0.023) in the exposure-efficacy analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Erlotinib, imatinib, lapatinib and sorafenib show large inter-individual variability in exposure. TDM entails a significant improvement in exposure and enables more effective and safe use of TKIs in routine clinical practice.

Evaluating the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in the clinical use of small molecule kinase inhibitors: a review of the literature

Introduction: Orally administered small molecule kinase inhibitors (KI) are a key class of targeted anti-cancer medicines that have contributed substantially to improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced disease. Since the introduction of KIs in 2001, there has been a building body of evidence that the benefit derived from these drugs may be further enhanced by individualizing dosing on the basis of concentration.Areas covered: This review considers the rationale for individualized KI dosing and the requirements for robust therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Current evidence supporting TDM-guided KI dosing is presented and critically evaluated, and finally potential approaches to address translational challenges for TDM-guided KI dosing and alternate approaches to support individualization of KI dosing are discussed.Expert opinion: Intuitively, the individualization of KI dosing through an approach such as TDM-guided dosing has great potential to enhance the effectiveness and tolerability of these drugs. However, based on current literature evidence it is unrealistic to propose that TDM-guided KI dosing should be routinely implemented into clinical practice.

How I treat obesity and obesity related surgery in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: An outcome of an ELN project

Obesity may affect treatment outcome in CML patients, therefore the treatment of this cohort of patients need careful monitoring, TKIs dose adjustment may be required for certain patients. Further studies are needed to determine the proper TKIs doses.

Individualized Management of Blood Concentration in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor, and surgical resection is the first choice for the treatment of the disease, but since the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib (IM), the prognosis of the disease has undergone revolutionary changes. According to the current version of the guidelines, most GIST patients receive a fixed dose without taking into account their own individual differences, resulting in a wide difference in blood concentration, adverse reactions and prognosis. With more studies on the relationship between blood drug concentrations and prognosis, the concept of individualized therapy has been paid more attention by researchers. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has also been made available for the research field of GIST targeted therapy. How to reduce the incidence of drug resistance and adverse reactions in patients with GISTs has become the focus of the current research. This article reviews the common monitoring methods and timing of TKIs blood concentration, the reasonable range of blood drug concentration, the toxic or adverse effects caused by high blood drug concentration, some possible factors affecting blood drug concentration and recent research progress, in order to discuss and summarize the treatment strategy of individual blood drug concentration, improve the prognosis of patients and reduce the adverse effects as much as possible.

Factors Influencing the Steady-State Plasma Concentration of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Imatinib mesylate (IM) is the standard treatment for advanced, metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with a fixed daily standard dosage via the oral route. Interindividual and intraindividual variability in plasma concentrations have been closely linked to the efficacy of IM therapy. Therefore, this review identifies and describes the key factors influencing the plasma concentration of IM in patients with GISTs and CML. We used the following keywords to search the PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Wangfang, and CNKI databases to identify published reports: IM, plasma concentration, GISTs, CML, drug combination/interaction, pathology, and genotype/genetic polymorphism, either alone or in combination. This literature review revealed that only 10 countries have reported the mean concentrations of IM in GISTs or CML patients and the clinical outcomes in different ethnic groups and populations. There were totally 24 different gene polymorphisms, which were examined for any potential influence on the steady-state plasma concentration of IM. As a result, some genotype locus made discrepant conclusion. Herein, the more sample capacity, multicenter, long-term study was worthy to carry out. Eleven reports were enumerated on clinical drug interactions with IM, while there is not sufficient information on the pharmacokinetic parameters altered by drug combinations with IM that could help in investigating the actual drug interactions. The drug interaction with IM should be paid more attention in the future research.

Determination of the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib using a stable isotopically labeled intravenous imatinib-d8 microdose

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib (Glivec®) during steady state plasma pharmacokinetics in cancer patients could be determined through a concomitant intravenous administration of a single 100 μg microdose of deuterium labeled imatinib (imatinib-d8). Secondly, the usefulness of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was investigated for simultaneous analysis of orally and intravenously administered imatinib.

METHODS

Included patients were on a stable daily dose of 400 mg oral imatinib prior to study participation. On day 1, patients received a 100 μg intravenous imatinib-d8 microdose 2.5 h after intake of the oral dose. Plasma samples were collected for 48 h. Imatinib and imatinib-d8 concentrations were simultaneously quantified using a validated LC-MS/MS assay. The absolute bioavailability was calculated by comparing the dose-normalized exposure with unlabeled and stable isotopically labeled imatinib in plasma.

RESULTS

A total of six patients were enrolled. All patients had a history of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). The median absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib at steady state was 76% (range 44-106%). Imatinib and imatinib-d8 plasma concentrations were quantified in all collected plasma samples, with no samples below the limit of quantification for imatinib-d8.

CONCLUSION

The absolute bioavailability of imatinib was successfully estimated at steady state plasma pharmacokinetics using the stable isotopically labeled microdose trial design. This study exhibits the use of a stable isotopically labeled intravenous microdose to determine the absolute bioavailability of an oral anticancer agent in patients with LC-MS/MS as the analytical tool.

Correlations between imatinib plasma trough concentration and adverse reactions in Chinese patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Imatinib is the standard treatment for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but there is significant variation in imatinib plasma trough concentrations (C_min ) among patients. The imatinib C_min distribution at different doses and the correlation of adverse reactions with C_min in Chinese patients with GIST from a high-volume center were evaluated.

METHODS

From July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018, patients who were receiving imatinib treatment for GIST were prospectively enrolled. Steady-state blood samples were obtained from patients who had received same-dose imatinib treatment for ≥1 month with good compliance. Adverse reactions were recorded during regular follow-up, and blood samples were collected 24 ± 2 hours after dosing. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure drug concentrations.

RESULTS

In total, 307 patients who received 367 dose levels were investigated. The imatinib C_min was 1315 ± 716 ng/mL, 2117 ± 597 ng/mL, and 3844 ± 987 ng/mL in patients who were receiving imatinib 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg daily, respectively. The C_min was significantly correlated with periorbital and limb edema (P < .001), anemia (P < .001), and rash (P = .037). Nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and conjunctival hemorrhage also were correlated, but not significantly. A much higher C_min was observed with severe adverse reactions. There was no correlation between the imatinib C_min and leukopenia, muscle cramps, or hepatobiliary dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese patients with GIST, the imatinib C_min was higher than that reported for Western populations, especially at higher doses. The C_min was correlated with periorbital and limb edema, anemia, and rash, suggesting that monitoring the imatinib C_min should be considered when patients develop severe adverse reactions caused by excessive imatinib plasma concentrations.

Imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib: From flat-fixed dosing towards a pharmacokinetically guided personalized dose

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are anti‐cancer drugs that target tyrosine kinases, enzymes that are involved in multiple cellular processes. Currently, multiple oral TKIs have been introduced in the treatment of solid tumours, all administered in a fixed dose, although large interpatient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability is described. For imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib exposure‐treatment outcome (efficacy and toxicity) relationships have been established and therapeutic windows have been defined, therefore dose optimization based on the measured blood concentration, called therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), can be valuable in increasing efficacy and reducing the toxicity of these drugs.

In this review, an overview of the current knowledge on TDM guided individualized dosing of imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib for the treatment of solid tumours is presented. We summarize preclinical and clinical data that have defined thresholds for efficacy and toxicity. Furthermore, PK models and factors that influence the PK of these drugs which partly explain the interpatient PK variability are summarized. Finally, pharmacological interventions that have been performed to optimize plasma concentrations are described. Based on current literature, we advise which methods should be used to optimize exposure to imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib.

The effect of gastrectomy on regorafenib exposure and progression-free survival in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Aims

We investigated whether major gastrectomy influences the plasma exposure of regorafenib and treatment outcome.

Methods

Efficacy and pharmacokinetic data from 133 gastrointestinal stromal tumour patients included in a phase III trial were analysed. Patients were subdivided into 2 groups according to the extent of the gastrectomy (no/nonsignificant gastrectomy and major gastrectomy). Progression‐free survival (PFS) on regorafenib was measured and regorafenib and its pharmacological active metabolites plasma exposure were measured.

Results

A total of 133 patient were included, of whom 27 underwent major gastrectomy. In patients with no/nonsignificant gastrectomy the median PFS was 145 (interquartile range 43–281) days. The PFS in patients with a major gastrectomy was 172 (interquartile range 57–280) days. Regorafenib pharmacokinetic samples were collected in 80 patients of which 19 patients with a major gastrectomy and 61 patients with no/nonsignificant gastric surgery. The average ± standard deviation total concentration of regorafenib including the metabolites M‐2 and M‐5 was 6.9 ± 1.53 μmol/L and 6.7 ± 1.56 μmol/L in patient with major gastrectomy and no/nonsignificant gastrectomy respectively.

Conclusion

Our study shows that major gastrectomy did not influence plasma exposure of regorafenib and metabolites. In addition, no difference in PFS between the subgroups was seen.

Relative Factors Analysis of Imatinib Trough Concentration in Chinese Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

AIMS

Imatinib plasma trough levels (IM Cmin) have been reported to have a considerable clinical impact in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). We therefore have investigated the factors affecting IM plasma concentration in Chinese GIST patients.

METHODS

IM Cmin in 190 patients with GIST who were taking IM were measured.

RESULTS

In patients treated with IM 300 mg/day (n = 16), 400 mg/day (n = 168), and > 400 mg/day (500: n = 1, 600: n = 5), IM Cmin was 1,564.54 ± 596.15, 1,521.26 ± 610.33, and 2,540.31 ± 1,298.14 ng/mL, respectively. Of the 168 patients treated with IM 400 mg/day, IM Cmin was significantly lower in males (1,353.94 ± 492.89 ng/mL) than in females (1,680.79 ± 669.03 ng/mL, p < 0.01), and in patients with gastrectomy (1,439.60 ± 587.66 ng/mL) than those without gastrectomy (1,649.88 ± 620.12 ng/mL) (p = 0.033). High IM Cmin was correlated with low body weight (p = 0.004) and low body surface area (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

IM Cmin at steady state was significantly associated with body weight and body surface area. Monitoring of IM Cmin might be particularly important for the optimal treatment with IM of male patients and those who have undergone gastrectomy.

Prolonging Gastrointestinal-Stromal-Tumor-free life, an optimal suggestion of imatinib intervention ahead of operation

Background: Imatinib has been regarded as the first successful synthetic small molecule targeting at blocking tyrosine kinase. Its high efficacy stabilized disease in above 80% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients over 10 years survival. Due to the similar canceration of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) as to CML, imatinib has been approved to be used as first-line treatment. Study design: Our retrospective study was proposed to enroll 191 GIST patients with larger tumor size (≥8 cm) who preoperative accepted imatinib from those with direct operation. Analysis included demographics, cancer specific survival and relationship of their risk factors. Results: Male patients and gastrointestinal (GI) tract location took higher proportion in total cases, detection of KIT mutant took 89.7% among all traceable genetic testing. Patients with preoperative imatinib can achieve higher cancer specific survival (CSS) after both in 1 year and 3 years duration than their counterpart. Tumor size above its threshold of 8 cm would be a hazardous factor for poor prognosis. Conclusion: In conclusion, as for regressing tumor progression and creating operative chance, preoperative imatinib should be considered for the patients with high risk, although the precise duration of this intervention needs further validation.

Neoadjuvant Therapy to Downstage the Extent of Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare malignant tumors in terms of incidence, and they are not linked to specific symptoms. Often, primary tumors, particularly of the stomach, rectum, or rectovaginal space, are quite large when detected, and multivisceral resection seems to be the treatment of choice as the mainstay of therapy is complete tumor removal. If a gain-of-function mutation in the KIT gene is present, drug therapy with receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) might significantly downstage primary GIST tumors.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed to identify the current evidence for preoperative treatment of GIST regarding toxicity, efficacy, and oncological outcome, including mutational data from our own database.

RESULTS

Four phase II as well as several cohort studies showed acceptable toxicity and no increased perioperative morbidity of preoperative imatinib. Progressive disease during preoperative treatment was a rare event, and partial response was achieved in 40-80% of all patients. For methodological reasons, the trials cannot prove an oncological long-term superiority of preoperative treatment.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative therapy with imatinib is safe and recommended for patients with locally advanced GIST. Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy may enable less invasive and organ-sparing surgery, avoid tumor rupture during extensive resectional procedures, and improve the quality of perioperative RTKI treatment.

Systematic review of drug bioavailability following gastrointestinal surgery

PURPOSE

Inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetics variability in humans affects the way in which drugs act on the body. Gastrointestinal surgery has an impact on this variability and significantly alters the kinetics of drugs in post-surgical patients. The way in which pharmacokinetic profiles are modified depends on the type of operative procedure performed. The extent to which the absorption of different groups of drugs is affected varies according to the site and length of intestinal resections.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Three databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. For each drug, potential changes in absorption were described, including recommendations extracted from the results of the studies and collected according to authors' criteria as practical conclusions, and grades of recommendation were determined by levels of evidence using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine scale.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight articles were collected during the selection process after the bibliographic search. The main outcomes for 60 drugs from the various studies were classified according to each type of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifications in the digestive tract secondary to gastrointestinal surgery may compromise the bioavailability of drugs. Decreased absorption surface, gastric emptying speed, and gastric pH alteration are factors to be taken into account in the management of pharmacological treatment after surgery. Evidence supported by data in clinical practice is scarce, but after studying the pharmacokinetic profile of some molecules, it is possible to offer recommendations for its adaptation to the patient's clinical situation.

Women Administered Standard Dose Imatinib for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Have Higher Dose-Adjusted Plasma Imatinib and Norimatinib Concentrations Than Men

BACKGROUND

The standard dose of imatinib for the treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is 400 mg·d. A predose plasma imatinib concentration of >1 mg·L is associated with improved clinical response. This study aimed to assess the plasma imatinib and norimatinib concentrations attained in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia administered standard doses of imatinib adjusted for dose, age, sex, body weight, and response.

METHODS

We evaluated data from a cohort of patients treated between 2008 and 2014 with respect to dose, age, sex, body weight, and response.

RESULTS

The study comprised 438 samples from 93 patients (54 male, 39 female). The median imatinib dose was 400 mg·d in men and in women. The plasma imatinib concentration ranged 0.1-5.0 mg·L and was below 1 mg·L in 20% and 16% of samples from men and women, respectively. The mean dose normalized plasma imatinib and norimatinib concentrations were significantly higher in women in comparison with men. This was partially related to body weight. Mixed effects ordinal logistic regression showed no evidence of an association between sex and plasma imatinib (P = 0.13). However, there was evidence of an association between sex and plasma norimatinib, with higher norimatinib concentrations more likely in women than in men (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Imatinib therapeutic drug monitoring only provides information on dosage adequacy and on short-term adherence; longer-term adherence cannot be assessed. However, this analysis revealed that approximately 1 in 5 samples had a plasma imatinib concentration <1 mg·L, which was suggestive of inadequate dosage and/or poor adherence and posed a risk of treatment failure. Higher imatinib exposure in women may be a factor in the increased rate of long-term, stable, deep molecular response (undetectable breakpoint cluster-Abelson (BCR-ABL) transcript levels with a PCR sensitivity of 4.5 log, MR4.5) reported in women.

Can therapeutic drug monitoring increase the safety of Imatinib in GIST patients?

Imatinib at 400 mg daily is the standard treatment for patients affected with CML and GIST. The intervariability in plasma concentration is very significant. In many reports, a good therapeutic effect is attributed to an adequate concentration of Imatinib. However, few studies have been conducted to investigate the association between plasma concentration and side effects. Besides, no upper concentration limit of Imatinib plasma concentration detection has been established. The correlation of Imatinib trough concentrations (Cmin ) with adverse effects (AEs) was described here. Plasma samples were obtained from patients after 3 months treatment with Imatinib (steady state, n = 122). Liquid chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine the concentration of Imatinib and its metabolite NDI. The incidence of myelosuppression was increased significantly with the increased Imatinib trough plasma concentration. The plasma level of Imatinib and NDI in patients who developed myelosuppression are 1698.3 ± 598.6 ng/mL and 242.1 ng/mL, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in patients who did not (1327.2 ± 623.4 ng/mL, P = 1.75 × 10-4 ; 206.3 ng/mL, P = 0.006). Estimated exposure thresholds of Imatinib and NDI were 1451.6 ng/mL with ROCAUC (95%CI) of 0.693 (0.597-0.789) and 207.1 ng/mL with ROCAUC (95%CI) of 0.646 (0.546-0.745), respectively. Multivariate regression confirmed the correlation of Imatinib Cmin with myelosuppression. Other side effects such as fluid retention and rash were not found to be correlated with Imatinib concentrations. These results suggest that trough concentration of Imatinib should be taken into consideration to increase the safety of Imatinib therapy in GIST patients.

Imatinib Pharmacokinetics in a Large Observational Cohort of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour Patients

BACKGROUND

Low trough imatinib concentration (C _min) values have been associated with poor clinical outcomes in gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients. This study describes the pharmacokinetics of imatinib in a large cohort of GIST patients in routine clinical care.

METHODS

An observational study was performed in imatinib-treated GIST patients. Patient and tumour characteristics were derived from the Dutch GIST Registry and medical records. Imatinib concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The analyses included the occurrence of a low imatinib C _min (<1000 µg/L), the change in the C _min over time and the correlation between exposure and response.

RESULTS

In total, 421 plasma samples were available from 108 GIST patients. Most patients (79.6 %) received an imatinib dose of 400 mg. The inter- and intrapatient variabilities in C _min were 54 and 23 %, respectively. In the first steady-state sample, 44.4 % of patients presented with C _min values <1000 µg/L; 32.4 % of patients had values <1000 µg/L in >75 % of their samples. Only 33.3 % of patients had C _min values ≥1000 µg/L in all measured samples. No decrease in C _min over time was found (P > 0.05). Fifty-seven (91.9 %) of 62 palliative-treated patients had a tumour response (median C _min 1271 µg/L). Five palliative patients (8.1 %) did not respond (median C _min 920 µg/L). Given the limited number of non-responders in this cohort, no statistically significant association with clinical benefit could be demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

In routine clinical care, one third of GIST patients are systematically underexposed with a fixed dose of imatinib. Prospective clinical studies are needed to investigate the value of C _min-guided imatinib dosing in GIST patients.

Simultaneous quantification of imatinib and its main metabolite N-demethyl-imatinib in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its application to therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor

The aim of this study was to improve and validate a more stable and less time-consuming method based on liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC- MS/MS) for the quantitative measurement of imatinib and its metabolite N-demethyl-imatinib (NDI) in human plasma. Separation of analytes was performed on a Waters XTerra RP₁₈ column (50 × 2.1 mm i.d., 3.5 μm) with a mobile phase consisting of methanol-acetonitrile-water (65:20:15, v/v/v) with 0.05% formic acid at a flow-rate of 0.2 mL/min. The Quattro MicroTM triple quadruple mass spectrometer was operated in the multiple-reaction-monitoring mode via positive electrospray ionization interface using the transitions m/z 494.0 → 394.0 for imatinib, m/z 479.6 → 394.0 for NDI and m/z 488.2 → 394.0 for IS. The method was linear over 0.01-10 μg/mL for imatinib and NDI. The intra- and inter-day precisions were all <15% in terms of relative standard deviation, and the accuracy was within ±15% in terms of relative error for both imatinib and NDI. The lower limit of quantification was identifiable and reproducible at 10 ng/mL. The method was sensitive, specific and less time-consuming and it was successfully applied in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients treated with imatinib.

Optimizing the dose in cancer patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib

AIM

Fixed dose oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib show a high interpatient variability in plasma exposure. A relationship between plasma exposure and treatment outcome has been established, which supports the rationale for dose optimization of these drugs. The aim of this study was to monitor how many patients reached adequate trough levels after therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimization in daily practice.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed in patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib or pazopanib of whom follow-up drug levels were measured between August 2012 and April 2016. Patients' characteristics were collected by reviewing electronic patient records. Drug levels were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and trough levels were estimated using a predefined algorithm. Dose interventions were proposed based on trough levels.

RESULTS

In total, 396 trough levels were determined in 109 patients. Median sample frequency per patient was 3. During the first measurement only 38% of patients showed trough levels within the predefined target ranges despite standard dosing; 52% of the patients showed drug levels below and 10% above the target range. In 35 out of 41 patients (85%) dose interventions led to adequate trough levels. Eventually, 64% of the total cohort reached adequate trough levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose optimization proved an effective tool to reach adequate trough levels in patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib. The percentage of patients with adequate trough levels increased from 38 to 64%. Therapeutic drug monitoring may add to the improvement of efficacy and reduction of toxicity and costs of these treatments.

Preoperative imatinib mesylate (IM) for huge gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

Background

Preoperative imatinib mesylate (IM) treatment has not yet been standardized. Here, we aim to further explore such therapy on patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) retrospectively.

Methods

Patients experiencing preoperative IM were identified from January 2009 to February 2015.

Results

A total of 28 GIST patients were identified. The patients received preoperative IM treatment for a median length of 13.5 months, ranging from 5 to 37 months. PR and SD were observed in 24 (85.7%) and 4 (15.3%) patients, respectively. The tumor shrinkage occurred predominantly within 6 to 12 months, and slight tumor shrinkage could be observed after 12 months in certain patients. Nineteen patients (67.9%) received surgery, and R0 resection was acquired in 18 (94.7%) patients. The initial mean maximum diameter was 10.5 (5.2 to 19.0) cm and decreased to 5.9 (2.7 to 19.0) cm after preoperative treatment with a median length of 12 (ranging from 5 to 36) months (P < 0.001) in patients receiving operations. Three in 7 cases of rectum GIST underwent abdominoperineal resection, and four others adopted sphincter-sparing resection. Partial gastrectomy was performed in four patients.

Conclusions

IM prior to surgery can effectively prevent tumor rupture and facilitate surgery with low surgical morbidity for GIST patients. Tumor shrinkage following IM occurred predominantly within 6 to 12 months, and slight tumor shrinkage could be observed after 12 months in certain patients. In selected patients, prolonged exposure to IM is seemingly advisable under close radiological surveillance.

Genetic Polymorphisms Contribute to the Individual Variations of Imatinib Mesylate Plasma Levels and Adverse Reactions in Chinese GIST Patients

Imatinib mesylate (IM) has dramatically improved the outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. However, the clinical responses of IM may considerably vary among single individuals. This study aimed to investigate the influences of genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzyme (CYP3A4), transporters (ABCB1, ABCG2), and nuclear receptor (Pregnane X Receptor (PXR, encoded by NR1I2)) on IM plasma levels and related adverse reactions in Chinese GIST patients. A total of 68 Chinese GIST patients who have received IM 300–600 mg/day were genotyped for six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (CYP3A4 rs2242480; ABCB1 rs1045642; ABCG2 rs2231137; NRI12 rs3814055, rs6785049, rs2276706), and the steady-state IM trough plasma concentrations were measured by a validated HPLC method. There were statistically significant variances in the steady-state IM trough plasma concentrations (from 272.22 to 4365.96 ng/mL). Subjects of GG in rs2242480, T allele carriers in rs1045642 and CC in rs3814055 had significantly higher steady-state IM dose-adjusted trough plasma concentrations. Subjects of CC in rs3814055 had significantly higher incidence rate of edema. The genetic polymorphisms of rs2242480, rs1045642, rs3814055 were significantly associated with IM plasma levels, and the genetic variations of rs3814055 were significantly associated with the incidence rate of edema in Chinese GIST patients. The current results may serve as valuable fundamental knowledge for IM therapy in Chinese GIST patients.

Clinical implications of repeated drug monitoring of imatinib in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour

BACKGROUND

Imatinib mesylate (IM) is the preferred treatment for the majority of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). Low trough IM concentration (C_min) values have been associated with poor clinical outcomes in GIST patients. However, there are few studies of repeated measurements of IM levels, and therapeutic drug monitoring is not yet a part of routine clinical practice. This study was conducted to reveal clinical scenarios where plasma concentration measurement of IM trough level (C_min) is advantageous.

METHODS

Patients with advanced GIST receiving IM were included from January 2011 to April 2015. Heparin plasma was collected at each follow-up visit. Ninety-six samples from 24 patients were selected for IM concentration measurement. Associations between IM plasma concentration and clinical variables were analyzed by Students' t test, univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

The mean IM C_min plasma concentrations for patients taking <400, 400 and >400 mg daily were 782, 1132 and 1665 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.010). High IM C_min levels were correlated with age, low body surface area, low haemoglobin concentration, low creatinine clearance, absence of liver metastasis and no prior gastric resection in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis age, gastric resection and liver metastasis were included in the final model. Eight patients had disease progression during the study, and mean IM levels were significantly lower at time of progression compared to the previous measurement for the same patients (770 and 1223 ng/mL, respectively; p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support repeated monitoring of IM levels on a routine basis in all patients. However, we have revealed clinical scenarios where drug measurement could be beneficial, such as for patients who have undergone gastric resection, suspicion of non-compliance, subjectively reported side effects, in elderly patients and at the time of disease progression.

A lower dosage of imatinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors with toxicity of the treatment

This study investigated the efficiency and safety of imatinib in the lower dose (300 mg/d) in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who cannot tolerate imatinib in the standard dose (400 mg/d).Steady-state imatinib trough concentration (Cmin) values in 18 patients with GIST who were taking 300 mg/d or 400 mg/d imatinib were measured. The clinical features, toxicity data, and follow-up data were collected.Around 18 patients with GIST were investigated in which 9 patients received 300 mg/d imatinib. The mean imatinib Cmin value of the 18 patients was 1841 ng/mL (1018-3897 ng/mL). The difference between the patients treated with 400 mg/d (n=9) and those treated with 300 mg/d (n = 9), which have imatinib Cmin values of 2122±1003 ng/mL and 1559±478 ng/mL, respectively, was not significant (P = 0.148). In total, 12 of the 18 patients had complete resection of the primary tumor, 8 of whom received postoperative imatinib 300 mg/d. After the average follow-up of 15.4 months, no recurrence was documented. Of the 6 patients with unresected GIST, 1 received imatinib 300 mg/d for 13 months. The tumor size of this patient continued to decrease. In contrast to patients treated with imatinib 400 mg/d, patients treated with imatinib 300 mg/d notably exhibited lesser drug-related side effects.Patients with GIST who exhibited intolerance to the standard dose of imatinib (400 mg/d), a lower dose of 300 mg/d could provide not only sufficient plasma Cmin and good disease control but also the alleviation of the side effects.

Therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize the dosing of pazopanib: a pharmacokinetic feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with the standard dose of pazopanib show a large interpatient variability in drug exposure defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-24h). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided individualized dosing to reduce the interpatient variability in pazopanib exposure.

METHODS

Thirteen patients were treated with pazopanib for 3 consecutive periods of 2 weeks. During the first period, all patients received 800 mg of pazopanib once daily to reach steady-state exposure. During the second period, the patients either received a PK-guided individualized pazopanib dose or the registered fixed 800-mg dose. During the third period, these 2 dosing regimens were switched.

RESULTS

The interpatient variability in pazopanib AUC0-24h during fixed dosing (27.3 coefficient of variation) was not significantly different when compared with the variability in AUC0-24h during PK-guided dosing (24.8 coefficient of variation). The percentage of patients within the target window during PK-guided dosing (53.9%) was not significantly different from the percentage during fixed dosing (46.2%). Both Ctrough and C24 were significantly (P < 0.001) correlated to pazopanib AUC0-24h (R = 0.596 and R = 0.940, respectively). Pazopanib AUC0-24h decreased 17% over time.

CONCLUSIONS

PK-guided dosing did not reduce the interpatient variability in pazopanib exposure. In this study, the intrapatient variability in pazopanib exposure was relatively large compared with interpatient variability. This makes it challenging to achieve a target exposure within a predefined window. The causes of intrapatient variability must first be better understood and controlled, before PK-guided dosing can reduce the interpatient variability.

A safety evaluation of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

INTRODUCTION

For the last 15 years, imatinib mesylate has been the first line treatment of choice for advanced (metastatic) GIST.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes key efficacy data on imatinib for the treatment of GIST, and focuses on safety and tolerability of imatinib, with emphasis on common adverse events management and long term toxicity profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Imatinib has been the standard of care for metastatic GIST and probably will continue to be so for the next few years. Still, despite dramatic responses initially, imatinib drug resistance continues to be the major factor for treatment discontinuation. The toxicity profile of imatinib has been well characterized, and although the majority of patients experience an adverse event during treatment with imatinib, these side effects are usually mild and manageable, with the majority of patients continuing treatment uninterruptedly. Early concerns regarding imatinib related cardiotoxicity in GIST have not been confirmed in large prospective randomized trials, with reports indicating a low incidence of approximately 0.2%-0.4%. Future strategies for treatment of imatinib resistant GIST will probably include novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors, combination therapies or immunotherapy.

Relationship between imatinib trough concentration and outcomes in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Imatinib has dramatically improved the prognosis of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Clinical trial data showed that patients with trough imatinib plasma concentrations (Cmin) below 1100 ng/ml (quartile 1) had shorter time to progression, but no threshold has been defined. The main objective of this study was to investigate in advanced GIST whether a Cmin threshold value associated with a longer progression-free survival (PFS) could be specified. This would be the first step leading to therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib in GIST.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced GIST patients (n=96) treated with imatinib 400 mg/d (41 stomach, 34 small bowel, and 21 other primary site localisations) were prospectively included in this real-life setting study. Routine plasma level testing imatinib (Cmin) and clinical data of were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

Small bowel localisation was associated with an increased relative risk of progression of 3.09 versus stomach localisation (p=0.0255). Mean Cmin (±standard deviation) was 868 (±536) ng/ml with 75% inter-individual and 26% intra-patient variability. A Cmin threshold of 760 ng/ml defined by log-rank test was associated with longer PFS for the whole population (p=0.0256) and for both stomach (p=0.043) and small bowel (p=0.049) localisations when analysed separately. Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that Cmin above 760 ng/ml was associated with 65% reduction risk of progression (p=0.0271) in the whole population independently of the anatomical localisation.

CONCLUSION

Concentration of imatinib significantly influences duration of tumour control treatment in GIST patients with a Cmin threshold of 760 ng/ml associated with prolonged PFS in real-life setting.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of the Oral Absorption Process and Explaining Intra-Subject Variability in Plasma Exposures of Imatinib in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Imatinib mesylate is presently the first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The aim of this study was to investigate the absorption and distribution kinetics of imatinib in healthy Iranian volunteers using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NLMEM) to assess the overall, intra- and inter-subject variabilities in pharmacokinetic parameters after oral administration.

METHODS

This analysis was based on data from 24 healthy subjects who participated in a bioequivalence study after administering a single dose of 200 mg of each formulation. Imatinib concentrations were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography method. To simultaneously describe the imatinib pharmacokinetic profiles obtained with both formulations, a population pharmacokinetic model was applied to data using SAEM algorithm implemented in MONOLIX, whilst simulations were used by numerical solving of ordinary differential equations to calculate secondary parameters in individuals for bioequivalence studies.

RESULTS

According to goodness-of-fit criteria, a two-compartment open model with sequential zero- then first-order absorption and first-order elimination was used as the structural pharmacokinetic model. Inter-individual variability (IIV) was considered for all parameters. Typical population estimates (% IIV) were fraction of the drug absorbed with a zero-order kinetic (Fr) of 0.153 (47.9 %) in period (Tk0) of 0.714 h (47.4 %), first-order absorption rate constant (k a) of 0.94 h(-1)(31.2 %), oral clearance of 19 L/h (27.9 %), central volume of distribution (V c/F) of 139 L (21.5 %), apparent peripheral volume of distribution (V p/F) of 130 L (29.7 %) and the apparent inter-compartment clearance (Q/F) of 29.6 L/h (41.8 %). Body mass index (BMI) was the only covariate found to significantly affect V p /F. The coefficient of variation for intra-individual plasma exposure (AUC0-∞) was 27.8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyses using NLMEM for imatinib exhibited absorption complexities such as two input rates and medium to high intra-individual variability in drug exposure.

Personalized Medicine in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST): Clinical Implications of the Somatic and Germline DNA Analysis

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. They are characterized by gain of function mutations in KIT or PDGFRA tyrosine kinase receptors, with their consequent constitutive activation. The gold standard therapy is imatinib that offers a good and stable response for approximately 18–36 months. However, resistance is very common and it is vital to identify new biomarkers. Up until now, there have been two main approaches with focus to characterize novel targets. On the one hand, the focus is on the tumor genome, as the final clinical outcome depends mainly from the cancer specific mutations/alterations patterns. However, the germline DNA is important as well, and it is inconceivable to think the patients response to the drug is not related to it. Therefore the aim of this review is to outline the state of the art of the personalized medicine in GIST taking into account both the tumor DNA (somatic) and the patient DNA (germline).

Effect of glucuronidation on transport and tissue accumulation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: consequences for the clinical management of sorafenib and regorafenib

INTRODUCTION

UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are a multigenic family of enzymes responsible for the glucuronidation reaction. Many therapeutic classes of drugs used in solid tumors are UGT substrates, including cancer therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This article describes the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) undergoing hepatic glucuronidation; its effect on transport and tissue accumulation and the clinical consequences of this particular metabolism. A PubMed search concerning the pharmacokinetics of the TKIs was performed. All are extensively metabolized by CYP450. Two TKIs, sorafenib and regorafenib, also have a major UGT-mediated metabolism and were therefore studied.

EXPERT OPINION

The prescription of the same dose of sorafenib and regorafenib for all patients may be inappropriate since at each enzymatic step of this multistep metabolism inter-individual fluctuations exist. Having a non-exclusive CYP-mediated route of metabolism may reduce the risk of variability in drug exposure when CYP3A4 substrates are concomitantly given. Several clinical consequences derive from this pharmacokinetic particularity of sorafenib and regorafenib. Since no clear difference distinguishes TKIs in efficacy in large randomized trials, the differences for the clinical management of their toxicity is a critical aspect.

Effect of gastrointestinal resection on sunitinib exposure in patients with GIST

Background

GIST patients often undergo GI-surgery. Previous studies have shown that imatinib and nilotinib exposures were decreased in GIST patients with prior major gastrectomy. We investigated whether major gastrectomy influences the exposure to sunitinib and its active metabolite SU12662.

Methods

Pharmacokinetic data from 305 GIST patients included in 4 phase I-III trials were analyzed. Patients were subdivided into 6 groups according to their prior GI-surgery. Apparent clearance (CL/F) and dose-corrected steady-state plasma exposures (AUC_24,ss) of sunitinib and SU12662 were estimated using a population PK approach. ANCOVA was performed to test for differences in AUC_24,ss and CL/F between each surgery subgroup and controls.

Results

Major gastrectomy did not influence sunitinib or SU12662 exposure. The geometric mean of sunitinib and SU12662 AUC_24,ss was decreased by 21% and 28% in patients with both gastrectomy and small bowel resection (n = 8) compared to controls (n = 63) for sunitinib (931 ng*hr/mL (95%-CI; 676–1283) versus 1177 ng*hr/mL (95%-CI; 1097–1263); p < 0.05) and SU12662 (354 ng*hr/mL (95%-CI; 174–720) versus 492 ng*hr/mL (95%-CI; 435–555); p < 0.05). No significant differences in exposure were observed in each of the other subgroups versus controls.

Conclusion

In contrast to previous results for imatinib and nilotinib, gastrectomy alone does not influence sunitinib or SU12662 exposure. This should be taken into account for the treatment of gastrectomized GIST patients with TKIs. In patients who had undergone both gastrectomy and small bowel resection, sunitinib and SU12662 exposures are significantly, although clinically not relevantly, decreased.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring

The treatment of many malignancies has been improved in recent years by the introduction of molecular targeted therapies. These drugs interact preferentially with specific targets that are mutated and/or overexpressed in malignant cells. A group of such targets are the tyrosine kinases, against which a number of inhibitors (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs) have been developed. Imatinib, a TKI with targets that include the breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (bcr-abl) fusion protein kinase and mast/stem cell growth factor receptor kinase (c-Kit), was the first clinically successful drug of this type and revolutionized the treatment and prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. This success paved the way for the development of other TKIs for the treatment of a range of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. To date, 14 TKIs have been approved for clinical use and many more are under investigation. All these agents are given orally and are substrates of a range of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes. In addition, some TKIs are capable of inhibiting their own transporters and metabolizing enzymes, making their disposition and metabolism at steady-state unpredictable. A given dose can therefore give rise to markedly different plasma concentrations in different patients, favoring the selection of resistant clones in the case of subtherapeutic exposure, and increasing the risk of toxicity if dosage is excessive. The aim of this review was to summarize current knowledge of the clinical pharmacokinetics and known adverse effects of the TKIs that are available for clinical use and to provide practical guidance on the implications of these data in patient management, in particular with respect to therapeutic drug monitoring.

Optimizing tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: exploring the benefits of continuous kinase suppression

The oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib has revolutionized the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), most of which harbor oncogenic mutation in genes that encode the receptor tyrosine kinases KIT or PDGFA. Imatinib is the standard of care for patients with advanced GIST and for patients with primary GIST at significant risk of recurrence after surgery. Design. This review discusses data supporting continuous kinase suppression with imatinib and key issues, including response to imatinib reintroduction, effect of treatment interruption on secondary resistance to imatinib, and prognostic factors associated with sustained response to imatinib. Results. Long-term follow-up results of the B2222 study and updated results of the BFR14 trial demonstrate that continuous imatinib treatment in patients with advanced GIST is associated with reduced risk of progression. For patients progressing on or intolerant of imatinib, continuing therapy with TKIs sunitinib followed by regorafenib is recommended. In the adjuvant setting, final results of the trial by the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group and the Sarcoma Group of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie demonstrate that 3 years of adjuvant imatinib, compared with 1 year, significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and improves overall survival of patients with KIT-positive GIST at high risk of recurrence. Conclusions. Maintenance of therapy with TKIs is the key to successful treatment of GIST. Results from recent studies provide a strong rationale for continuous imatinib treatment for 3 years following surgical resection and long-term continuous administration in advanced or metastatic GIST.