Gene expression-based diagnostics for molecular cancer classification of difficult to diagnose tumors

INTRODUCTION

Standardized methods for accurate tumor classification are of critical importance for cancer diagnosis and treatment, particularly in diagnostically-challenging cases where site-directed therapies are an option. Molecular diagnostics for tumor classification, subclassification and site of origin determination based on advances in gene expression profiling have translated into clinical practice as complementary approaches to clinicopathological evaluations.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the foundational science of gene expression-based cancer classification, technical and clinical considerations for clinical translation, and an overview of molecular signatures of tumor classification that are available for clinical use will be discussed. Proposed approaches will also be described for further integration of molecular tests for cancer classification into the diagnostic paradigm using a tissue-based strategy as a key component to direct evaluation.

EXPERT OPINION

Increasing evidence of improved patient outcomes with the application of site and molecularly-targeted cancer therapy through use of molecular tools highlights the growing potential for these gene expression-based diagnostics to positively impact patient management. Looking forward, the availability of adequate tissue will be a significant issue and limiting factor as cancer diagnosis progresses; when the tumor specimen is limited, use of molecular classification may be a reasonable early step in the evaluation, particularly if the tumor is poorly-differentiated and has atypical features.

Unknown primary tumors

An unknown primary tumor (UPT) is defined by the presence of a metastatic cancer without a known primary site of origin despite a standardized diagnostic workup. Clinically, UPTs show rapid progression and early dissemination, with signs and symptoms related to the metastatic site. The molecular bases of their biology remain largely unknown, with no evidence as to whether they represent a distinct biological entity. Immunohistochemistry remain the best diagnostic tool in term of cost-effectiveness, but the time-consuming "algorithmic process" it relies on has led to the application of new molecular techniques for the identification of the primary site of UPTs. For example, several microarray or miRNA classifications of UPTs have been used, with an accuracy in the prediction of the primary site as high as 90%. It should be noted that validating a prediction of tissue origin is challenging in these patients, since most of them will never have a primary site identified. Moreover, prospective studies to determine whether selection of treatment options based on such profiling methods actually improves patient outcome are still missing. In the last few years functional imaging (i.e. FDG-PET/CT) has gained a main role in the detection of the site of origin of UPTs and is currently recommended by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. However, despite recent refinements in the diagnostic workup, the site of origin of UPT often remains elusive. As a consequence, treatment of patients with UPT is still empirical and inadequate.