Palbociclib in adults aged 70 years and older with advanced breast cancer: A phase 2 multicenter trial (Alliance A171601)

INTRODUCTION

Palbociclib is a widely used treatment for advanced breast cancer in older adults. However, the existing evidence regarding its safety and tolerability in this age group is inconsistent and limited to retrospective subgroup or pooled analyses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective single-arm multicenter phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of palbociclib in participants aged 70 years or older with advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Participants were given palbociclib in combination with their physician's choice of endocrine therapy (letrozole or fulvestrant). The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3+ adverse events (AEs) by six months. Secondary endpoints included AE-related dose delays, dose reductions, early discontinuations, and hospitalizations. Additionally, we compared these endpoints by age groups (70-74 and ≥ 75 years).

RESULTS

Of the 90 participants (median age 74 years [70-87]) enrolled, 75.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4-84.0) had grade 3+ AEs by six months. The most frequent grade 3+ AEs were neutropenia (61%), fatigue (4%), and nausea (3%). Febrile neutropenia was uncommon (1.1%). Due to AEs, 36% had dose delays, 34% had dose reductions, 10% had early discontinuations, and 10% had hospitalizations. Compared to those aged 70-74 years, participants aged ≥75 years had higher rates of early discontinuations (5.9% vs 15.9%, a difference of 9.5% [95% CI 3.5%-22.5%]).

DISCUSSION

Palbociclib has an overall favorable safety profile in adults aged ≥70 with advanced breast cancer. However, adults ≥75 years had a trend toward higher rates of AE-related early discontinuations compared to those 70-74 years. Further research is needed to evaluate tolerability and improve the delivery of palbociclib in older adults.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov:NCT03633331.

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment for fatigue after COVID-19 infection: study protocol for a pilot randomized sham-controlled trial

Background

As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread globally, its sequelae, called Long COVID, have persisted, troubling patients worldwide. Although fatigue is known to be the most frequent among Long COVID symptoms, its mechanism and treatment have not been clearly demonstrated. In 2022, we conducted a preliminary prospective case series and found that acupuncture and moxibustion were feasible interventions for fatigue. This study is a pilot patient-assessor-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment for patients with fatigue that has persisted for at least 4 weeks after recovery from COVID-19.

Methods

Thirty patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the acupuncture or sham acupuncture treatment groups. Treatment will be conducted thrice a week for both groups during 4 weeks. The primary outcome will be the efficacy and safety of acupuncture, including numeric rating scale (NRS), brief fatigue inventory (BFI), fatigue severity scale (FSS), and adverse event evaluation. Secondary outcomes will be evaluation of improvement in the comorbid symptoms of fatigue and feasibility variables. Outcome variables will be assessed before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment completion.

Discussion

The results of this study will be used to clarify the efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment for persistent fatigue in patients with Long COVID. Additionally, the feasibility of the study design was validated to provide evidence for future full-scale randomized controlled trials.Clinical trial registration: identifier: KCT0008656 https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=24785&search_page=L.

Patient preferences, regret, and health-related quality of life among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A pilot longitudinal study

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcomes and is generally incurable. Therefore, understanding preferences of older adults with AML is critical. We sought to assess whether best-worst scaling (BWS) can be used to capture attributes considered by older adults with AML when making initial treatment decisions and longitudinally, as well as assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and decisional regret over time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a longitudinal study for adults ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML, we collected: (1) attributes of treatment most important to patients using BWS, (2) HRQoL using EQ-5D-5L, (3) decisional regret using the Decisional Regret Scale, and (4) treatment worthiness using the "Was it worth it?" questionnaire. Data was collected at baseline and over six months. A hierarchical Bayes model was used to allocate percentages out of 100%. Due to small sample size, hypothesis testing was performed at α = 0.10 (2-tailed). We analyzed how these measures differed by treatment choice (intensive vs. lower intensity treatment).

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 76 years (n = 15). At baseline, the most important attributes of treatment to patients were response to treatment (i.e., chance that the cancer will respond to treatment; 20.9%). Compared to those who received lower intensity treatment (n = 7) or best supportive care (n = 2), those who received intensive treatment (n = 6) generally ranked "alive one year or more after treatment" (p = 0.03) with higher importance and ranked "daily activities" (p = 0.01) and "location of treatment" (p = 0.01) with less importance. Overall, HRQoL scores were high. Decisional regret was mild overall and lower for patients who chose intensive treatment (p = 0.06).

DISCUSSION

We demonstrated that BWS can be used to assess the importance of various treatment attributes considered by older adults with AML when making initial treatment decisions and longitudinally throughout treatment. Attributes of treatment important to older patients with AML differed between treatment groups and changed over time. Interventions are needed to re-assess patient priorities throughout treatment to ensure care aligns with patient preferences.

Patient Perspectives and Quality of Life after Breast Reconstruction and the Impact of Subsequent Revisions

There is limited research on the impact of revisional surgery after breast reconstruction on patient experience and postoperative quality of life (QoL).

Methods

Patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate implant-based or autologous free-flap breast reconstruction from 2008 to 2020 were reviewed. These patients were categorized by revisions (0-1, 2-3, and 4+) and surveyed on QoL metrics using BREAST-Q and Was It Worth It? (WIWI) questionnaires. BREAST-Q QoL, satisfaction, and WIWI metrics between revision groups were evaluated.

Results

Among 252 patients, a total of 150 patients (60%) underwent zero to one revisions, 72 patients (28%) underwent two to three revisions, and 30 patients (12%) underwent four or more revisions. Median follow-up was 6 years (range, 1-11 years). BREAST-Q satisfaction among patients with four or more revisions was significantly lower (P = 0.03), while core QoL domains (chest physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being) did not significantly differ. Analysis of unplanned reoperations due to complications and breast satisfaction showed no significant difference in QoL scores between groups (P = 0.08). Regarding WIWI QoL metrics, four or more revisions were associated with a higher rate of worse QoL (P = 0.035) and worse overall experience (P = 0.001). Most patients in all revision groups felt it was worthwhile to undergo breast reconstruction (86%), would choose breast reconstruction again (83%), and would recommend breast reconstruction to others (79%).

Conclusions

Overall, a majority of patients undergoing revisions after breast reconstruction still have a worthwhile experience. Although reoperations after breast reconstruction do not significantly impact long-term BREAST-Q QoL domains, patients undergoing four or more revisions have significantly lower breast satisfaction, worse QoL, and a postoperative experience worse than expected.

Comprehensive Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Care: Protocol for the Randomized Acute Kidney Injury in Care Transitions Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

Innovative care models are needed to address gaps in kidney care follow-up among acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors. We developed the multidisciplinary AKI in Care Transitions (ACT) program, which embeds post-AKI care in patients' primary care clinic.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this randomized pilot trial is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the ACT program and study protocol, including recruitment and retention, procedures, and outcome measures.

METHODS

The study will be conducted at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, a tertiary care center with a local primary care practice. Individuals who are included have stage 3 AKI during their hospitalization, do not require dialysis at discharge, have a local primary care provider, and are discharged to their home. Patients unable or unwilling to provide informed consent and recipients of any transplant within 100 days of enrollment are excluded. Consented patients are randomized to receive the intervention (ie, ACT program) or usual care. The ACT program intervention includes predischarge kidney health education from nurses and coordinated postdischarge laboratory monitoring (serum creatinine and urine protein assessment) and follow-up with a primary care provider and pharmacist within 14 days. The usual care group receives no specific study-related intervention, and any aspects of AKI care are at the direction of the treating team. This study will examine the feasibility of the ACT program, including recruitment, randomization and retention in a trial setting, and intervention fidelity. The feasibility and acceptability of participating in the ACT program will also be examined in qualitative interviews with patients and staff and through surveys. Qualitative interviews will be deductively and inductively coded and themes compared across data types. Observations of clinical encounters will be examined for discussion and care plans related to kidney health. Descriptive analyses will summarize quantitative measures of the feasibility and acceptability of ACT. Participants' knowledge about kidney health, quality of life, and process outcomes (eg, type and timing of laboratory assessments) will be described for both groups. Clinical outcomes (eg, unplanned rehospitalization) up to 12 months will be compared with Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

This study received funding from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality on April 21, 2021, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board on December 14, 2021. As of March 14, 2023, seventeen participants each have been enrolled in the intervention and usual care groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Feasible and generalizable AKI survivor care delivery models are needed to improve care processes and health outcomes. This pilot trial will test the ACT program, which uses a multidisciplinary model focused on primary care to address this gap.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05184894; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05184894.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/48109.

Feasibility and acceptability of an online intervention to enhance hopefulness among oncology professionals

BACKGROUND

Patients prefer medical communication including both hopefulness and realism, though health-care professional (HCPs) struggle to balance these. Providers could thus benefit from a detailed personal understanding of hope, allowing them to model and convey it to patients. Additionally, given that hope is associated with lower levels of burnout, HCPs may benefit from tools designed to enhance their own personal hopefulness. Several investigators have proposed offering HCPs interventions to augment hope. We developed an online workshop for this purpose.

METHODS

Feasibility and acceptability of the workshop were assessed in members of the SWOG Cancer Research Network. Three measures were used: the Was-It-Worth-It scale, a survey based on the Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model, and a single item prompting participants to rate the degree to which they believe concepts from the workshop should be integrated into SWOG studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine individuals signed up for the intervention, which consisted of a single 2-hour session, and 23 completed measures. Results from Was-It-Worth-It items indicate that nearly all participants found the intervention relevant, engaging, and helpful. Mean ratings for Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model items were high, ranging from 6.91 to 7.70 on 8-point scales. Finally, participants provided a mean rating of 4.44 on a 5-point scale to the item "To what degree do you believe it may be useful to integrate concepts from this workshop into SWOG trials/studies?"

CONCLUSIONS

An online workshop to enhance hopefulness is feasible and acceptable to oncology HCPs. The tool will be integrated into SWOG studies evaluating provider and patient well-being.

The Impact of Same-Day Discharge and Enhanced Recovery on Patient Quality of Life After Mastectomy with Implant Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate how enhanced recovery (ER) protocols and same-day discharge (SDD) influences patients' postoperative quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Patients who underwent mastectomy with implant-based breast reconstruction from 2008 to 2020 were identified in a prospective database. The study assessed QOL with BREAST-Q and Was It Worth It? (WIWI) questionnaires. Responses were compared between the ER and pre-ER groups and between the SDD and hospital stay (HS) groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 568 patients, with a 43% response rate, and 217 patients were included for analysis. Chest physical well-being was lower for the ER cohort, but postoperative breast satisfaction was higher. Psychosocial status, sexual well-being, and satisfaction with information given did not differ significantly between the ER group and the pre-ER or SDD group. In the compared groups, QOL did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced recovery with SDD after mastectomy using implant-based reconstruction did not have an adverse impact on patient postoperative QOL.

The impact of mastectomy and reconstruction technique on patient perceived quality of Life

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate the impact of mastectomy type, post-mastectomy reconstruction choice, and procedure bilaterality, on patient perceived postoperative quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Patients who underwent post-mastectomy reconstruction between 2008 and 2020 were identified in a prospective database. QoL was assessed with the BREAST-Q and the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaires. The results were compared between reconstruction type, reconstruction laterality, and type of mastectomy. Responses were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

568 patients met inclusion criteria, and 244 patients responded (43%). QoL did not significantly vary between different reconstructions selected, procedure laterality, or mastectomy type. Patients who underwent DIEP flap were significantly more satisfied with their reconstructed breasts than implant-based reconstruction. Overall, over 85% of patients experienced improved or unchanged QoL no matter what reconstruction choices were made.

CONCLUSION

Most domains of QOL are not impacted by mastectomy type, post-mastectomy reconstruction, or laterality.

A prospective, randomized trial of patient-reported outcome measures to drive management decisions in hematology and oncology

Background

Clinicians have limited time during patient encounters which can result in patients' concerns not being addressed. This study's objective was to test whether an electronic patient-reported outcome quality of life tool (PROQOL) in which patients identify their primary concern during clinic visits improves cancer patient quality of life (QOL).

Patients and methods

This single center non-blinded prospective clinical trial randomized patients (2:1) to PROQOL versus usual care (UC). Two patient cohorts were enrolled: those with hematologic malignancies (multiple myeloma [MM] or light chain amyloidosis [AL]) and solid tumors (head and neck [H/N] or gynecologic [GYN] malignancies). Primary endpoint was patient-reported QOL at 12 months measured by a single-item Linear Analog Self-Assessment. Value to patients and impact on clinician workflow was measured using a "was it worth it" survey. The study was powered to detect a 0.5 standard deviation difference between groups.

Results

Overall 383 patients were enrolled, 171 with MM, 62 AL, 113 GYN, and 37 H/N between July 2016 and April 2018, with 12-month follow-up. There were 171 (44.6%) male patients and median age was 62 years (range 31-87). The most often selected concern was physical health (30.9%), and second was cancer diagnosis and treatment (29.1%). Mean QOL was 7.12 for PROQOL and 6.98 for UC (0-10 scale) at 12 months, with no between-group difference overall (p = 0.56) or within hematologic or solid tumor cohorts, respectively. Among patients, 74% thought the PROQOL tool was worthwhile, 86% would choose PROQOL again, and 81% would recommend it to others. Among clinicians, 95% responded that PROQOL was worthwhile and did not think that PROQOL negatively impacted their workflow.

Conclusions

Although we did not demonstrate a QOL difference between PROQOL and UC groups; the PROQOL tool held considerable value in identifying patients' main concerns over time and was worthwhile for patients and clinicians.

An Electronic Information Kiosk for Enhancing Patient Accrual for Cancer Clinical Trials: A Pilot and Feasibility Study

Introduction

Low accrual to clinical trials for solid tumors at our institution led to a review of possible modifiable factors within our control. This led to a pilot project to determine whether improved patient awareness could alter accrual rates to active trials.

Methods

An information kiosk was located at the patient library on the ground floor of the London Regional Cancer Program. Adult cancer patients were invited to learn more about clinical trials from our research navigator, including specific trials open in our center, and to participate in the study, which involved a brief satisfaction and demographics survey.

Results

Three hundred and eighty-six (386) patients interacted with the clinical trial information kiosk over the eight weeks it was open. Of these, 32 patients consented and filled out surveys, which indicated an overall positive interaction with the kiosk. Unfortunately, in the time period examined, clinical trial accrual rates appeared to decrease when the pre- and post-kiosk activation periods were compared (44 versus 37 patients accrued to various trials).

Conclusion

Our pilot study found that the implementation of a clinical trial information kiosk was easy to understand and useful for patients to learn more about clinical trials. Barriers to this patient satisfaction translating into increased accrual rates in our center included suboptimal kiosk location and lack of guidance to the kiosk from clerical staff. High patient satisfaction scores support the potential value of permanent clinical trial information kiosks in our cancer center, but this requires increased attention to visibility, location, and staff education.

Strategies to Improve Participation of Older Adults in Cancer Research

Cancer is a disease associated with aging. As the US population ages, the number of older adults with cancer is projected to dramatically increase. Despite this, older adults remain vastly underrepresented in research that sets the standards for cancer treatments and, consequently, clinicians struggle with how to interpret data from clinical trials and apply them to older adults in practice. A combination of system, clinician, and patient barriers bar opportunities for trial participation for many older patients, and strategies are needed to address these barriers at multiple fronts, five of which are offered here. This review highlights the need to (1) broaden eligibility criteria, (2) measure relevant end points, (3) expand standard trial designs, (4) increase resources (e.g., institutional support, interdisciplinary care, and telehealth), and (5) develop targeted interventions (e.g., behavioral interventions to promote patient enrollment). Implementing these solutions requires a substantial investment in engaging and collaborating with community-based practices, where the majority of older patients with cancer receive their care. Multifaceted strategies are needed to ensure that older patients with cancer, across diverse healthcare settings, receive the highest-quality, evidence-based care.

"Was It Worth It?": A Pilot Study in Patient Perspectives on the Worthwhileness of Radiation Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Radiation therapy is a core oncologic treatment, but literature detailing patient satisfaction post-treatment is sparse. The authors conducted a pilot study to determine whether a simple survey would be feasible to administer and could elucidate factors predictive of satisfaction with radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy in an academic radiation oncology department from 2014 to 2015 received a 4-item radiotherapy-focused version of the "Was It Worth It?" questionnaire (r-WIWI) on the last day of treatment and at the first follow-up. Univariate analysis and logistic regression modeling were performed on collected patient and treatment characteristics to explore predictors of satisfaction.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients completed an r-WIWI questionnaire at treatment completion and 60 at the time of the first follow-up. Seventy-one percent and 90% of patients found radiotherapy worthwhile on the last day of treatment and at first follow-up, respectively. Patients treated during the morning and for a longer duration as measured in elapsed days were more likely to report treatment being worthwhile. Age, sex, race, marital status, employment status, treatment intent or modalities, daily radiation treatment delays, distance traveled, insurance type, site of treatment, and cancer stage were not predictive of patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The r-WIWI survey was feasible to administer and most patients reported treatment being worthwhile on the last day of treatment and at first follow-up. Morning treatment times and longer treatment duration as measured in elapsed days were predictive of higher satisfaction in this pilot study. A broader study of factors associated with patient satisfaction with radiotherapy using the r-WIWI is indicated.

Patient-reported outcomes of blue-light flexible cystoscopy with hexaminolevulinate in the surveillance of bladder cancer: results from a prospective multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate blue-light flexible cystoscopy (BLFC) with hexaminolevulinate in the office surveillance of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a high risk of recurrence by assessing its impact on pain, anxiety, subjective value of the test and patient willingness to pay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, multicentre, phase III study was conducted during which the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety, Pain and 'Was It Worth It' questionnaires were administered at baseline, after surveillance with BLFC and after resection for those referred to the operating room. Comparisons of scores were performed between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 304 patients were enrolled, of whom 103 were referred for surgical examination. Of these, 63 were found to have histologically confirmed malignancy. Pain levels were low throughout the study. Anxiety levels decreased after BLFC (∆ = -2.6), with a greater decrease among those with negative pathology results (P = 0.051). No differences in anxiety were noted based on gender, BLFC results, or test performance (true-positive/false-positive). Most patients found BLFC 'worthwhile' (94%), would 'do it again' (94%) and 'would recommend it to others' (91%), with no differences based on BLFC results or test performance. Most patients undergoing BLFC (76%) were willing to pay out of pocket.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety decreased after BLFC in patients with negative pathology, including patients with false-positive results. Most of the patients undergoing BLFC were willing to pay out of pocket, found the procedure worthwhile and would recommend it to others, irrespective of whether they had a positive BLFC result or whether this was false-positive after surgery.

A Snapshot of Community Engagement in Research in the Context of an Evolving Public Health Paradigm: Review

BACKGROUND

Community engagement is a work in process. Researchers continue to refine the process of collaboration and look to best practice and lessons learned for guidance in this relatively new model.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide a snapshot of whether community engagement has been included in the design and implementation of research initiatives in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. The secondary aim is to identify the underlying themes present, to identify theories and tools that drive research.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify studies that have been conducted to reduce the weight of the general population.

RESULTS

The results of the study, which focused on the field of weight loss, indicate that scientific and technological advancements are the primary drivers of research. However, these new research initiatives have largely been undertaken in the absence of community engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concludes that initiatives need to adapt to a wider range of stakeholders, develop equitable community engagement platforms and take into consideration.