Malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lung: Russian clinical guidelines

удалить

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommended management for patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. Patients with metastatic lung cancer who are eligible for targeted therapies or immunotherapies are now surviving longer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on targeted therapies for patients with metastatic NSCLC and actionable mutations.

Clinical Outcomes of Chemotherapeutic Molecules as Single and Multiple Agents in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) Patients

Background and Objectives: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the world. Non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) makes up 85% of all lung cancer cases and the majority of patients are diagnosed when the cancer is advanced. Over the years, many anticancer drugs have been designed and introduced into the market to treat patients with advanced NSCLC. This review aims to discuss the comparative therapeutic benefits of conventional chemotherapeutics and other drugs available for treating advanced NSCLC. Materials and Methods: A literature search for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC was carried out on PubMed and Google Scholar. Objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival were chosen as target endpoints. Results: Monotherapy showed lower treatment endpoints compared to combination therapy. Different combinations of platinum-based doublets demonstrated similar efficacies in treating NSCLC. However, pemetrexed-platinum doublets showed significantly better treatment endpoint in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Most studies showing the best complete response rate (CRR) utilized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), while most studies producing the best overall survival included programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in their treatment regimens. Conclusions: The findings of this review indicate that targeted therapy using specific inhibitors is now the most promising first-line anticancer treatment available in the market. However, chemotherapy is still effective in treating advanced NSCLC and is viable as a first-line treatment.

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy for the diagnosis and monitoring of EML4-ALK NSCLC patients

Background

Genomic rearrangement in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene occurs in 3-7% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The detection of this alteration is crucial as ALK positive NSCLC patients benefit from ALK inhibitors, which improve both the patient's quality of life and overall survival (OS) compared to traditional chemotherapy.

Content

In routine clinical practice, ALK rearrangements are detected using tissue biopsy. Nevertheless, the availability of tumor tissue is compromised in NSCLC patients due to surgical complications or difficult access to the cancer lesion. In addition, DNA quality and heterogeneity may impair tumor biopsies testing. These limitations can be overcome by liquid biopsy, which refers to non-invasive approaches for tumor molecular profiling. In this paper we review currently available technology for non-invasive ALK testing, in NSCLC patients, based on the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) such as exosomes.

Summary and outlook

Non-invasive tumor molecular profiling is crucial to improve outcomes and quality of life of NSCLC patients whose tumors harbor a translocation involving ALK locus.

Adequacy of Malignant Pleural Effusion for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Analysis Using the Pyrosequencing Method

Background:

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation analysis is a standard approach for initial therapeutic decision in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung (MAL). The feasibility of performing EGFR mutation testing using pleural fluid specimen is not well characterized.

Objectives:

The aim of this study is to report the percentage of patients eligible for EGFR mutation testing based on the percentage of malignant cells (PMCs) in the pleural fluid using the pyrosequencing method.

Methods:

From our database, we reviewed the clinical data of 61 patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) secondary to MAL. The PMCs were divided into 2 categories with a cutoff point of 10% (PMC1 is defined as ≤10% and PMC2 is defined as >10%). For the pyrosequencing method, only patients in the PMC2 group were eligible for EGFR mutation testing.

Results:

Of 61 patients with MPE secondary to MAL, 38 (62.3%) were in the PMC2 group, which represents the percentage of patients eligible for EGFR mutation testing. Of these 38 patients, 15 patients had the testing done on the MPE. Quantity was not sufficient for testing only in 1 patient. Therefore, in PMC2 patients group, the rate of successful EGFR mutation testing was 93% (14 of 15). The thoracentesis volume was not significantly different between PMC1 and PMC2.

Conclusion:

Performing EGFR mutation analysis on the MPE in patients with MAL is feasible in 62% of patients. The rate of successful testing on the eligible samples is 93%.

Immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for the detection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangements in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: potential advantages and methodologic pitfalls

CONTEXT

Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene (EML4) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) fusion was shown to be the driver of tumorigenesis in approximately 3% to 5% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with response to inhibition with crizotinib. However, no complete agreement regarding the best diagnostic test for identification of ALK rearrangements has been achieved yet.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the concordance, sensitivity, and specificity of immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of ALK rearrangements.

DESIGN

Thirty-six prospectively tested patients with NSCLC who had adenocarcinoma and 10 ALK-positive samples were included in the study. All samples were tested by IHC (ALK1 clone, 5A4 clone, D5F3 clone), FISH (LSI ALK Break Apart and ALK FISH Probe), and multiplexed RT-PCR.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry staining was successful in all samples.. Clone D5F3 showed the best sensitivity and specificity of 100%; clones ALK1 and 5A4 showed sensitivities of 91% with specificity of 100%. Both FISH probes showed concordance with sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Hybridization and RT-PCR were successful in 98% and 93.4% of samples, respectively, with sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 100%. Frequent artifacts leading to misinterpretation were observed with all 3 methodologies.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 methodologies showed good sensitivity, specificity, and concordance, when artifacts were characterized and excluded. However, all ambiguous cases have to be confirmed as ALK rearranged by at least 2 of the 3 methods.

Mechanistic insight into ALK receptor tyrosine kinase in human cancer biology

The burgeoning field of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) in cancer encompasses many cancer types, from very rare cancers to the more prevalent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The common activation of ALK has led to the use of the ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib in a range of patient populations and to the rapid development of second-generation drugs targeting ALK. In this Review, we discuss our current understanding of ALK function in human cancer and the implications for tumour treatment.

Esophagitis resulting from treatment with crizotinib for anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement-positive lung adenocarcinoma: A case report

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer and is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Treatment is currently focused on individualization according to the molecular profile of the disease. Here we present the case of a 41-year-old patient who presented with multiple pulmonary nodules, a left pleural effusion and an ovarian tumor. Adenocarcinoma of the lung was diagnosed from pathological examination of the pleural effusion and the surgically resected ovarian tumor, and chemotherapy was initiated. Relapse was experienced following third-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive adenocarcinoma was diagnosed using a specimen from the resected ovarian tumor. Subsequently, crizotinib therapy was initiated. Eight days later the patient developed severe nausea and vomiting and esophagitis was diagnosed by gastrointestinal endoscopic examination. Following the interruption of crizotinib treatment by treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), crizotinib treatment was re-initiated and was effective for a minimum of 6 months. Clinicians should be aware that treatment with crizotinib may result in severe esophagitis.

Impact of genetic markers on treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer represents a group of heterogeneous diseases. The last decade witnessed significant progress in improving our understanding of the biology of non-small cell lung cancer, which led to the identification of several genetic targets. Those genetic targets were utilized to explain clinical phenomena, such as the occurrence of non-small cell lung cancer in never-smokers, to predict response to conventional chemotherapy and biological agents, and to explain and predict resistance to therapy. The progress in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the last few years was based on a new generation of population-enriched clinical trials that utilized genetic targets such as somatic EGFR mutations and ALK-EML4 mutations. In this review we will discuss the available information about the key genetic markers of non-small cell lung cancer and the pivotal clinical trials that validate the use of those genetic markers in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Targeting ALK: a promising strategy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and neuroblastoma

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a tyrosine kinase receptor that affects a number of biological and biochemical functions through normal ligand-dependent signaling. It has oncogenic functions in a number of tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and neuroblastoma when altered by translocation or amplification or mutation. On August 2011, a small molecule inhibitor against ALK, crizotinib, was approved for therapy against NSCLC with ALK translocations. As we determine the molecular heterogeneity of tumors, the potential of ALK as a relevant therapeutic target in a number of malignancies has become apparent. This review will discuss some of the tumor types with oncogenic ALK alterations. The activity and unique toxicities of crizotinib are described, along with potential mechanisms of resistance and new therapies beyond crizotinib.

EML4-ALK testing in non-small cell carcinomas of the lung: a review with recommendations

In non-small cell lung cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have a major impact upon the level of response to treatment with specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This review describes the molecular basis of ALK inhibition, summarizes current data on the effectiveness and safety of ALK inhibition therapy, describes the different testing methodologies with their advantages and disadvantages, provides a suggested testing algorithm and puts forward a proposal for an external quality assessment program in ALK testing.

The biology and clinical features of non-small cell lung cancers with EML4-ALK translocation

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) acts as a dominant oncogenic driver following chromosomal rearrangements in certain cancers including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLC with ALK translocation occurs in a specific subset of patients and results in unique clinical features. Crizotinib is a small molecule inhibitor of ALK kinase that has recently been approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. Treatment with crizotinib results in clinical benefit rate of 85%-90% and a median progression-free survival of 9-10 months for this molecular subset of patients. Ongoing studies will define the impact of crizotinib on overall survival and provide insights into the resistance mechanisms and potential activation of alternate pathways. Heat shock protein 90 inhibitors also appear promising in the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC patients, based on early results. This article reviews the characteristics, treatment, and ongoing research in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

Recent advances in lung cancer: summary of presentations from the 47 th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2011

In the last several years, we have made slow but steady progress in developing new treatment strategies for patients with lung cancer. The use of molecularly targeted therapy has made a significant impact on the outcomes of patients with lung cancer. Further research is ongoing to identify more effective ways to target lung cancer. In the recently concluded 47 th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, there were several presentations on novel targeted therapies for lung cancer, in addition to the effective and optimal use of existing cytotoxic and targeted therapies for lung cancer. For this review, we have selected presentations that primarily have an impact on clinical practice, and some presentations regarding emerging therapeutic agents.

Predictive biomarkers in colorectal cancer: usage, validation, and design in clinical trials

As cancer treatment development has shifted its attention to targeted therapies, it is becoming increasingly important to provide tools for selecting the right treatment for an individual patient to achieve optimal clinical benefit. Biomarkers, identified and studied in the process of understanding the nature of the disease at the molecular pathogenesis level, have been increasingly recognized as a critical aspect in more accurate diagnosis, prognosis assessment, and therapeutic targeting. Predictive biomarkers, which can aid treatment decisions, require extensive data for validation. In this article, we discuss the definition, clinical usages, and more extensively the clinical trial designs for the validation of predictive biomarkers. Predictive biomarker validation methods can be broadly grouped into retrospective and prospective designs. Retrospective validation utilizes data from previously conducted prospective randomized controlled trials. Prospective designs include enrichment designs, treatment-by-marker interaction designs, marker-based strategy designs, and adaptive designs. We discuss each design with examples and provide comparisons of the advantages and disadvantages among the different designs. We conclude that the combination of scientific, clinical, statistical, ethical, and practical considerations provides guidance for the choice of the clinical trial design for validation of each proposed predictive biomarker.

Clinical cancer advances 2011: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology

A message from ASCO'S President. It has been forty years since President Richard Nixon signed the National Cancer Act of 1971, which many view as the nation's declaration of the "War on Cancer." The bill has led to major investments in cancer research and significant increases in cancer survival. Today, two-thirds of patients survive at least five years after being diagnosed with cancer compared with just half of all diagnosed patients surviving five years after diagnosis in 1975. The research advances detailed in this year's Clinical Cancer Advances demonstrate that improvements in cancer screening, treatment, and prevention save and improve lives. But although much progress has been made, cancer remains one of the world's most serious health problems. In the United States, the disease is expected to become the nation's leading cause of death in the years ahead as our population ages. I believe we can accelerate the pace of progress, provided that everyone involved in cancer care works together to achieve this goal. It is this viewpoint that has shaped the theme for my presidential term: Collaborating to Conquer Cancer. In practice, this means that physicians and researchers must learn from every patient's experience, ensure greater collaboration between members of a patient's medical team, and involve more patients in the search for cures through clinical trials. Cancer advocates, insurers, and government agencies also have important roles to play. Today, we have an incredible opportunity to improve the quality of cancer care by drawing lessons from the real-world experiences of patients. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is taking the lead in this area, in part through innovative use of health information technology. In addition to our existing quality initiatives, ASCO is working with partners to develop a comprehensive rapid-learning system for cancer care. When complete, this system will provide physicians with personalized, real-time information that can inform the care of every patient with cancer as well as connect patients with their entire medical teams. The rapid learning system will form a continuous cycle of learning: securely capturing data from every patient at the point of care, drawing on evidence-based guidelines, and evaluating quality of care against those standards and the outcomes of other patients. Clinical trials are another area in which collaboration is critical. Increasing clinical trial participation will require commitment across the cancer community from physicians, patients, insurers, hospitals, and industry. A 2010 report by the Institute of Medicine described challenges to participation in trials by both physicians and patients and provided recommendations for revitalizing clinical trials conducted through the National Cancer Institute's Cooperative Group Program. ASCO has pledged its support for the full implementation of these recommendations. More broadly, ASCO recently outlined a bold vision for translational and clinical cancer research for the next decade and made recommendations to achieve that vision. Accelerating Progress Against Cancer: ASCO's Blueprint for Transforming Clinical and Translational Research, released in November, calls for a research system that takes full advantage of today's scientific and technologic opportunities and sets a high-level agenda for policy makers, regulators, and advocates. Cancer research has transformed cancer care in the past forty years, and this year's Clinical Cancer Advances illustrates how far we have come in the past year alone. We now have a tremendous opportunity to use today's knowledge and collaborate across all facets of cancer care to conquer this deadly disease. Michael P. Link, MD President American Society of Clinical Oncology.