Integration of Novel Agents into the Care of Patients with Multiple Myeloma

The pace of therapeutic drug development in multiple myeloma has reached unprecedented levels, with five regulatory approvals for relapsed and/or refractory disease of either new drugs or new drug regimens in 2015, one already in 2016, and still others anticipated. This has provided a wide array of options to be considered by patients and their health care providers in the event of relapse after or progression on front-line therapy. Most of these agents are currently being evaluated in earlier patient populations, including as parts of induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy approaches, where their benefits may be even greater. Moreover, additional randomized studies have been completed with our previous stable of novel agents that inform their use in these settings as well. In the current contribution to this CCR Focus on multiple myeloma, we will present an overview of some of the key recent data that have supported the addition of these new therapeutics to our armamentarium against multiple myeloma. Also, we will provide some guidelines about possible best practices in applying these regimens and attempt to extrapolate how they will be used as parts of our future standards of care. Clin Cancer Res; 22(22); 5443-52. ©2016 AACR SEE ALL ARTICLES IN THIS CCR FOCUS SECTION, "MULTIPLE MYELOMA MULTIPLYING THERAPIES".

Elotuzumab in Combination With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Purpose

This phase I study evaluated elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM).

Patients and Methods

Three cohorts were enrolled and treated with elotuzumab (5.0, 10, or 20 mg/kg intravenously) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle in the first two cycles, and days 1 and 15 of each subsequent cycle; lenalidomide 25 mg orally [PO] on days 1 to 21; and dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during cycle 1 of each cohort, and clinical responses were evaluated during each cycle. The first five patients received up to six cycles of therapy; subsequent patients were treated until disease progression.

Results

Twenty-nine patients with advanced MM and a median of three prior MM therapies were enrolled; 28 patients were treated, three each in the 5.0-mg/kg and 10-mg/kg cohorts and 22 in the 20-mg/kg cohort. No DLTs were observed up to the maximum proposed dose of 20 mg/kg. The most frequent grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia (36%) and thrombocytopenia (21%). Two patients experienced a serious infusion reaction (one grade 4 anaphylactic reaction and one grade 3 stridor) during the first treatment cycle. Objective responses were obtained in 82% (23 of 28) of treated patients. After a median of 16.4 months follow-up, the median time to progression was not reached for patients in the 20-mg/kg cohort who were treated until disease progression.

Conclusion

The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone was generally well tolerated and showed encouraging response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory MM.