PACE Continuous Innovation Indicators-a novel tool to measure progress in cancer treatments

Concerns about rising health care costs and the often incremental nature of improvements in health outcomes continue to fuel intense debates about 'progress' and 'value' in cancer research. In times of tightening fiscal constraints, it is increasingly important for patients and their representatives to define what constitutes 'value' to them. It is clear that diverse stakeholders have different priorities. Harmonisation of values may be neither possible nor desirable. Stakeholders lack tools to visualise or otherwise express these differences and to track progress in cancer treatments based on variable sets of values. The Patient Access to Cancer care Excellence (PACE) Continuous Innovation Indicators are novel, scientifically rigorous progress trackers that employ a three-step process to quantify progress in cancer treatments: 1) mine the literature to determine the strength of the evidence supporting each treatment; 2) allow users to weight the analysis according to their priorities and values; and 3) calculate Evidence Scores (E-Scores), a novel measure to track progress, based on the strength of the evidence weighted by the assigned value. We herein introduce a novel, flexible value model, show how the values from the model can be used to weight the evidence from the scientific literature to obtain E-Scores, and illustrate how assigning different values to new treatments influences the E-Scores. The Indicators allow users to learn how differing values lead to differing assessments of progress in cancer research and to check whether current incentives for innovation are aligned with their value model. By comparing E-Scores generated by this tool, users are able to visualise the relative pace of innovation across areas of cancer research and how stepwise innovation can contribute to substantial progress against cancer over time. Learning from experience and mapping current unmet needs will help to support a broad audience of stakeholders in their efforts to accelerate and maximise progress against cancer.

Clinical outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 randomized trial in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The ACCORD 12 trial investigated the value of two different preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) regimens in T3-4 Nx M0 resectable rectal cancer. Clinical results are reported after follow-up of 3 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 2005 and July 2008, a total of 598 patients were randomly assigned to preoperative CT-RT with CAP45 (45-Gy RT for 5 weeks with concurrent capecitabine) or CAPOX50 (50-Gy RT for 5 weeks with concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Total mesorectal excision was planned 6 weeks after CT-RT. The primary end point was sterilization of the operative specimen, which was achieved in 13.9% versus 19.2% of patients, respectively (P = .09). Clinical results were analyzed for all randomly assigned patients according to the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

At 3 years, there was no significant difference between CAP45 and CAPOX50 (cumulative incidence of local recurrence, 6.1% v 4.4%; overall survival, 87.6% v 88.3%; disease-free survival, 67.9% v 72.7%). Grade 3 to 4 toxicity was reported in four patients in the CAP45 group and in two patients in the CAPOX50 group. Bowel continence, erectile dysfunction, and social life disturbance were not different between groups. In multivariate analysis, the sterilization rate (Dworak score) of the operative specimen was the main significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.50).

CONCLUSION

At 3 years, no significant difference in clinical outcome was achieved with the intensified CAPOX regimen. When compared with other recent randomized trials, these results indicate that concurrent administration of oxaliplatin and RT is not recommended.

Radiosensitization by the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat under hypoxia and with capecitabine in experimental colorectal carcinoma

Background

The histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat is a candidate radiosensitizer in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Radiosensitivity is critically influenced by hypoxia; hence, it is important to evaluate the efficacy of potential radiosensitizers under variable tissue oxygenation. Since fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the only clinically validated regimen in LARC, efficacy in combination with this established regimen should be assessed in preclinical models before a candidate drug enters clinical trials.

Methods

Radiosensitization by vorinostat under hypoxia was studied in four colorectal carcinoma cell lines and in one colorectal carcinoma xenograft model by analysis of clonogenic survival and tumor growth delay, respectively. Radiosensitizing effects of vorinostat in combination with capecitabine were assessed by evaluation of tumor growth delay in two colorectal carcinoma xenografts models.

Results

Under hypoxia, radiosensitization by vorinostat was demonstrated in vitro in terms of decreased clonogenicity and in vivo as inhibition of tumor growth. Adding vorinostat to capecitabine-based CRT increased radiosensitivity of xenografts in terms of inhibited tumor growth.

Conclusions

Vorinostat sensitized colorectal carcinoma cells to radiation under hypoxia in vitro and in vivo and improved therapeutic efficacy in combination with capecitabine-based CRT in vivo. The results encourage implementation of vorinostat into CRT in LARC trials.

Multicenter phase II clinical trial of preoperative capecitabine with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

To assess pathologic complete response, sphincter preservation rates and toxicity profile of preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients from six Spanish centers were included (March 2004 to June 2005) with histological/cytological diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer, age between 18 and 80 years, ECOG 0-2, adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic functions. Prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy was not allowed. Preoperative treatment was capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) bid concomitant to radiotherapy (45 + 5.4 Gy boost over 5.5 weeks). Surgery was performed 4-8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in this study: 60.3 % males, median age of 64.5 (30.9-78.7) years, 28.6 % with ECOG 0 and 71.4 % with ECOG 1. Median distance of tumor from the anal verge was 7 (1-12) cm. Fifty-two (89.6. %) patients completed preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Primary tumor and node downstaging occurred in 61.1 and 69.6 % of patients, respectively. Surgery was performed in 55 patients (94.8 %): 80 % had negative lymph nodes and 72.7 % underwent sphincter-preserving procedures. A pathologic complete response was observed in 10.5 % (95 % CI 2.5-18.5) of the patients. Main grade I-II toxicities were leucopenia (43.1 %), neutropenia (24.1 %), anemia (36.2 %), diarrhea (32.8 %) and skin disorders (5.1 %), from which diarrhea (6.9 %), leucopenia (1.7 %) and skin disorders (1.7 %) reached grade III. There were no grade IV toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation is a well-tolerated and effective neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer that achieves encouraging rates of tumor downstaging.

Multicenter phase II clinical trial of preoperative capecitabine with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

To assess pathologic complete response, sphincter preservation rates and toxicity profile of preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients from six Spanish centers were included (March 2004 to June 2005) with histological/cytological diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer, age between 18 and 80 years, ECOG 0-2, adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic functions. Prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy was not allowed. Preoperative treatment was capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) bid concomitant to radiotherapy (45 + 5.4 Gy boost over 5.5 weeks). Surgery was performed 4-8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in this study: 60.3 % males, median age of 64.5 (30.9-78.7) years, 28.6 % with ECOG 0 and 71.4 % with ECOG 1. Median distance of tumor from the anal verge was 7 (1-12) cm. Fifty-two (89.6. %) patients completed preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Primary tumor and node downstaging occurred in 61.1 and 69.6 % of patients, respectively. Surgery was performed in 55 patients (94.8 %): 80 % had negative lymph nodes and 72.7 % underwent sphincter-preserving procedures. A pathologic complete response was observed in 10.5 % (95 % CI 2.5-18.5) of the patients. Main grade I-II toxicities were leucopenia (43.1 %), neutropenia (24.1 %), anemia (36.2 %), diarrhea (32.8 %) and skin disorders (5.1 %), from which diarrhea (6.9 %), leucopenia (1.7 %) and skin disorders (1.7 %) reached grade III. There were no grade IV toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation is a well-tolerated and effective neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer that achieves encouraging rates of tumor downstaging.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus capecitabine and concomitant radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To assess safety and activity of neoadjuvant bevacizumab, capecitabine and standard radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer as well as potential predictive biomarkers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The multicentric phase II study enrolled 43 patients who received bevacizumab infusion (5 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for 4 cycles; oral capecitabine at 825 mg/m(2) twice a day for 5.5 weeks with external-beam irradiation (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks). We determined certain biomarkers before and after therapy for correlation with response.

RESULTS

Post-operative histologic examination revealed no residual cancer cells in 6 of the 43 patients (14%; 95% confidence limits 3.60-24.31%). In another 22 patients (51.2%) a varying percentage of cancer cells in residual areas of fibrosis/ necrosis was found, corresponding to Mandard TRG 2 or 3 classification. Tumor resection with negative circumferential margin was achieved in 38/40 (95%) operated patients. Sphincter-sparing surgery was obtained in 31 (72.1%) patients. Primary tumor and lymph nodes downstaging was observed in 15 (34.9%) and 16 (37.2%) cases, respectively. Neoadjuvant therapy was safe and well tolerated. The most frequent side effects were G1-2 diarrhea, proctitis, rectal bleeding and hypertension. No biomarker tested was significantly predictive of both pathological complete response and disease-free survival. Pre-treatment CD-34 vessel density, post-treatment Ki-67 labeling index and VEGFR-2 cancer cells expression significantly correlated with residual tumor area.

CONCLUSIONS

The schedule of neoadjuvant therapy tested was safe and active. Pre-treatment vessel density by the panendothelial marker anti CD-34 antibody, post-treatment Ki-67 labeling index and VEGFR-2 expression were significantly associated to residual tumor area. The biomarkers correlations warrant further evaluation in prospective clinical trials.