Rituximab maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed CD20(+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final analysis of the collaborative trial in relapsed aggressive lymphoma

Sequencing of cellular therapy and bispecific antibodies for the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Historically, the management of relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) following first-line chemoimmunotherapy has been second-line chemotherapy, followed by high-dose chemotherapy and consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), resulting in durable remissions in approximately 40% of patients. In 2017, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy changed the landscape of treatment for patients with R/R DLBCL, with complete response rates ranging from 40-58% and long-term disease-free survival of >40% in the highest risk subgroups, including patients who relapsed after autologous HSCT. Since that time further studies have demonstrated improved overall response rates and survival outcomes in patients with primary refractory or early-relapsed (relapse within 1 year) DLBCL treated with CAR T-cell therapy compared with autologous HSCT, advancing CAR T-cell therapy into the second-line setting. However, >50% of patients will relapse in the post-CAR T-cell setting. In the past 2 years, two CD20 x CD3 bispecific antibodies were approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of R/R DLBCL after two or more lines of systemic therapy. These bispecific antibodies have demonstrated overall response rates exceeding 50% and durable remissions at >2 years of follow-up. Additionally, a notable treatment advantage of bispecific antibodies is their ability to be administered in the community setting, making treatment more accessible for patients. The development and advancement of these novel therapies raise questions regarding the ongoing role of HSCT in the management of R/R DLBCL and the best sequence of cellular and bispecific therapies to optimize patients' outcomes.

Combining Obinutuzumab With Radiation for Refractory DLBCL: Retrospective Safety and Efficacy Analysis

Purpose

Approximately 30% of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will develop relapsed or treatment-refractory disease after primary chemotherapy. Patients unable to undergo aggressive chemotherapy and stem cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy have limited treatment options. Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of combining obinutuzumab with cytoreductive radiation to all areas of disease in patients with relapsed DLBCL.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective review of patients with treatment refractory DLBCL was performed. All patients were treated with external beam radiation to all sites of refractory disease with concurrent and adjuvant obinutuzumab. Toxicities were evaluated based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression-free survival and overall survival.

Results

Between 2016 and 2022, 7 patients with refractory DLBCL were treated with concurrent radiation and obinutuzumab. No grade 3 or greater treatment-related toxicity was observed. Four of the 7 patients had a complete response at the radiated site on first postradiation imaging. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 30 months.

Conclusions

In this small cohort of treatment-refractory patients with DLBCL, the combination of radiation and obinutuzumab was well tolerated without excessive treatment-related toxicity. The combination resulted in durable disease control with a prolonged overall survival without additional treatment in a subset of patients.

Real-world evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on a multinational survey

Background

Real-world health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are scarce. This study is to compare patient-reported outcomes in patients with DLBCL across therapy lines and countries.

Methods

Data were derived from the Adelphi DLBCL Disease Specific Programme™ from January 2021 to May 2021, a survey of physicians and their DLBCL patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US).

Results

Overall, analysis was conducted on 441 patients with DLBCL across Europe and the US (mean age 64.6 years, 64% male); 68% had an Ann Arbor stage III and 69% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 1. The mean overall GHS/QoL was 54.1; patients on their 3L+ therapy had a lower mean GHS/QoL compared with patients on 1L/2L (P = 0.0033). Further to this, mean EQ-5D-5L utility score was reduced from 0.73 for patients on 1L therapy to 0.66 for patients on 3L+ therapies (P = 0.0149). Mean percentages of impairment while working and overall work impairment were lower for patients receiving 3L+ therapy (12.5% and 17.7%; respectively) than those on 1L therapy (35.6% and 33.8%; respectively). When comparing region, patients in the US had significantly better scores for all functioning and symptomatic scales (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and work impairment (per WPAI) vs. patients with DLBCL in Europe. WPAI scores indicate that the overall activity impairment in the US was 36.6% and in Europe ranged from 42.4% in the UK to 54.9% in Germany. Mean EQ-5D-5L utility score for the US was 0.80, compared to 0.60 - 0.80 across the countries in Europe. Regression analysis showed patients who relapsed after more than one year of treatment were associated with better patient reported outcomes than those who relapse after less than one year.

Conclusion

Patient-reported outcomes of DLBCL patients remain poor and patients continue to experience considerable morbidity.

A paradox of choice: Sequencing therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The available treatments for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have experienced a dramatic change since 2017. Incremental advances in basic and translational science over several decades have led to innovations in immune-oncology. These innovations have culminated in eight separate approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL over the last 10 years. High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients who relapse after an initial remission. For transplant-ineligible patients or for those who relapse following HDT-ASCT, multiple options exist. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD19, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, immune effector cell products, and other agents with novel mechanisms of action are now available for patients with R/R DLBCL. There is increasing use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells as second-line therapy for patients with early relapse of DLBCL or those who are refractory to initial chemoimmunotherapy. The clinical benefits of these strategies vary and are influenced by patient and disease characteristics, as well as the type of prior therapy administered. Therefore, there are multiple clinical scenarios that clinicians might encounter when treating R/R DLBCL. An optimal sequence of drugs has not been established, and there is no evidence-based consensus on how to best order these agents. This abundance of choices introduces a paradox: proliferating treatment options are initially a boon to patients and providers, but as choices grow further they no longer liberate. Rather, more choices make the management of R/R DLBCL more challenging due to lack of direct comparisons among agents and a desire to maximize patient outcomes. Here, we provide a review of recently-approved second- and subsequent-line agents, summarize real-world data detailing the use of these medicines, and provide a framework for sequencing therapy in R/R DLBCL.

Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus tisagenlecleucel for the treatment of 3L + relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the United States: incorporating longer survival results

AIMS

To provide an update on the cost-effectiveness of the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) among patients who have previously received ≥2 lines of systemic therapy using more mature clinical trial data cuts (60 months for axi-cel overall survival [OS] and 45 months for tisa-cel OS and progression-free survival [PFS]).

METHODS

A partitioned survival model consisting of three health states (pre-progression, post-progression and death) was used to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs associated with axi-cel and tisa-cel over a lifetime horizon. PFS and OS inputs for axi-cel and tisa-cel were based on a previously published matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC). Long-term OS and PFS were extrapolated using parametric survival mixture cure models (PS-MCMs). Costs of CAR-T cell therapy drug acquisition and administration, conditioning chemotherapy, apheresis, CAR T-specific monitoring, stem cell transplant, hospitalization, adverse events, routine care, and terminal care were sourced from US cost databases. Health state utilities were derived from previous publications. Model inputs were varied using a range of sensitivity and scenario analyses.

RESULTS

Compared with tisa-cel, axi-cel resulted in 2.51 additional QALYs and $50,185 additional costs (an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] of $19,994 per QALY gained). In probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), the ICER for axi-cel versus tisa-cel was ≤$50,000/QALY in 99.4% of simulations and ≤$33,500 in 99% of simulations. Axi-cel remained cost-effective versus tisa-cel (assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY) across a range of scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

With longer-term survival data, axi-cel continues to represent a cost-effective option versus tisa-cel for treatment of r/r LBCL among patients who have previously received ≥2 lines of systemic therapy, from a US payer perspective.

New Frontiers in Monoclonal Antibodies for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma. Approximately 60% of patients are cured with R-CHOP as a frontline treatment, while the remaining patients experience primary refractory or relapsed disease (R/R). The prognosis for R/R DLBCL patients who are neither eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantations nor CAR-T-cell treatment is poor, representing an important unmet need. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have dramatically improved therapeutic options in anti-cancer strategies, offering new opportunities to overcome chemo-refractoriness in this challenging disease, even in cases of primary non-responder DLBCL. Several novel mAbs, characterized by different mechanisms of action and targets, are now available for R/R DLBCL. Unbound mAbs induce an immune response against cancer cells, triggering different mechanisms, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), activation of antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and radioimmunotherapy (RIT), respectively, deliver a cytotoxic payload or a beta-emitter radionuclide to the targeted cells and nearby bystanders. Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTes) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) redirect and enhance the immune response against tumor cells. Here, we review therapeutic strategies based on monoclonal antibodies for R/R DLBCL.

PRESUMPTIVE RECURRENCE OF INTRAOCULAR LYMPHOMA DESPITE CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR T-CELL THERAPY

PURPOSE

To present the first reported case of presumptive intraocular recurrence of lymphoma following Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy despite systemic control by CD19-CAR T cells.

METHODS

Observational case report.

RESULTS

A 59-year-old man with diffuse, large, B-cell lymphoma subsequently developed secondary central nervous system disease despite chemotherapy. He underwent stem cell transplantation but relapsed again and was scheduled to receive CAR T-cell therapy. He developed vitritis several weeks before treatment, with vitreous biopsy showing non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma. He received CAR T-cell therapy following the vitrectomy. He presented 3 months following CAR T-cell therapy with nonspecific right eye floaters and discomfort, with the optical coherence tomography revealing subretinal saw-tooth deposits in the right eye, highly suggestive of lymphoma. This is despite having good systemic control with no other disease elsewhere in the body. He received intravitreal methotrexate to good effect.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case of a vitreoretinal lymphoma nonresponsive to CAR T-cell therapy, despite good central nervous system and systemic control. This is suggestive of anti-CD19 CAR T cells not trafficking into the eye in sufficient numbers to eliminate CD19-expressing neoplastic B cells. We suggest regular ophthalmic follow-up after CAR-T-cell therapy for patients where there is evidence of ocular involvement.

The progress of novel strategies on immune-based therapy in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with standard front-line immunochemotherapy, whereas nearly 30-40% of patients experience refractory or relapse. For several decades, the standard treatment strategy for fit relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients has been high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-SCT). However, the patients who failed in salvage treatment or those ineligible for subsequent auto-SCT have dismal outcomes. Several immune-based therapies have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and novel small molecules. Meanwhile, allogeneic SCT and radiotherapy are still necessary for disease control for fit patients with certain conditions. In this review, to expand clinical treatment options, we summarize the recent progress of immune-related therapies and prospect the future indirections in patients with R/R DLBCL.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in daily practice in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

We retrospectively evaluated long-term outcomes of high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDC/ASCT) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Between 2004 and 2020, 46 DLBCL patients received HDC/ASCT in our institution, including 12 patients (26.1%), who received as an upfront setting (UFS). At a median follow-up time of 69 months (range, 2-169 months), the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 82.5% (95%CI, 46.1-95.3%) in the UFS, and 57.8% (95%CI, 38.1-73.2%) in the relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients (n=34), respectively. The 5-year PFS rates were 62.3% (95%CI, 34.0-81.3%) in primary resistant (n=13) or early relapsing (within 1 year from the initial diagnosis) patients (n=4), and 53.3% (95%CI, 25.9-74.6%) in those relapsing >1 year after the initial diagnosis (n=17), with no statistically significant difference (p=0.498). In R/R patients, multivariate analysis showed that the remission status before HDC/ASCT was an independent poor prognostic factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 17.0; 95%CI, 3.35-86.6; p=0.000630) and high-risk category in the international prognostic index for OS (HR, 9.39; 95%CI, 1.71-51.6; p=0.0100). The incidence of non-relapse mortality by 5 years, and 10 years were 12.2%, and 15.2%, respectively. Eleven patients (23.9%) developed second malignancies, which was the most frequent late complication after HDC/ASCT, with 5-year, and 10-year cumulative incidence of 16.9%, 22.5%, respectively. In conclusion, HDC/ASCT is effective for chemo-sensitive R/R DLBCL regardless of the timing and lines of therapy. However, careful observation is required, considering the long-term complications such as secondary malignancies.

Outcomes of polatuzumab vedotin-containing regimens in real-world setting of relapsed and or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: a matched-control analysis from the Thai Lymphoma Study Group (TLSG)

Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) is a challenging condition to treat, and there is an unmet clinical need for effective therapies. Recently, polatuzumab vedotin (Pola), an anti-CD79b antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC), combined with bendamustine-rituximab (BR), has been approved for R/R DLBCL patients. However, real-world data on Pola-based regimens in R/R DLBCL patients, especially in Thailand, are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. Thirty-five patients who received Pola-based treatment were included in the study, and their data were compared to 180 matched patients who received non-Pola-based therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) in the Pola group was 62.8%, with complete remission and partial remission rates of 17.1% and 45.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.6 months and 12.8 months, respectively. The study found a significantly higher ORR in Pola-based salvage treatments compared to non-Pola-based therapy (62.8% vs. 33.3%). The survival outcomes were also significantly superior in the Pola group, with longer median PFS and OS than the control group. Grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were mainly hematological, and they were tolerable. In conclusion, this study provides real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. The results of this study are promising and suggest that Pola-based salvage treatment could be a viable option for R/R DLBCL patients who have limited treatment options.

Lenalidomide maintenance following high-dose therapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in chemo-resistant or high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A phase I/II study

Improved maintenance treatments are needed for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphomas after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Several studies with lenalidomide have been found to have activity in the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphomas. In the present phase I/II, single-arm, open-label study, 59 patients with high-risk relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma received pretransplant BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT followed by 12 months of maintenance lenalidomide once daily on Days 1-21 (28-day cycles) beginning at post-transplantation Day 100. The most common histologies were mantle cell lymphoma (56%) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (24%). The maximum tolerated dose in the dose-finding part of the study was 15 mg, but cytopenias led to the subsequent adoption of a 10 mg dose in the final study. Sixteen patients (27%) completed 12 cycles of lenalidomide maintenance. The most common reason for discontinuation was adverse events (31%). These were primarily haematologic, and 56% of patients experienced Grade 3-4 events. Two-year PFS rates (95% CIs) were 70% (56%-80%), 45% (19%-68%) and 81% (66%-90%); 2-year OS rates (95% CIs) were 91% (80%-96%), 93% (61%-99%) and 90% (76%-96%) in all patients, patients completing and patients not completing 12-month maintenance respectively. These results do not support the use of lenalidomide maintenance in this setting.

Cell of origin is not associated with outcomes of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Activated B cell (ABC) type diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), double hit lymphoma (DHL) and double expressor lymphoma (DEL) have poor outcomes to frontline R-CHOP but impact of these molecular features on outcomes of relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease is not well-characterized. We evaluated the association of diagnostic cell of origin (COO), double hit and double expressor status with overall survival after first relapse in DLBCL patients who were enrolled into the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort. COO was available from immunohistochemistry (IHC) using Hans criteria or gene expression profiling (GEP) (Nanostring) on the diagnostic FFPE biopsy. Of 373 pts with R/R DLBCL, 278 had COO by IHC: 152 were GCB, 107 were non-GCB. One hundred and fourty had COO by GEP: 44 were ABC, 65 were GCB and 13 were unclassifiable. Nineteen out of 163 (12%) were DHL; 30 out of 135 (22%) had DEL. COO, either by IHC (2 years OS GCB: 45% [CI95 : 38-54] vs. non-GCB: 44% [CI95 :36-55], p > 0.05) or GEP (2 years OS ABC: 42% [CI95 : 29-59] vs. GCB: 40% [CI95 : 30-54], p > 0.05), was not associated with difference in OS. DHL (2 years OS 16 [CI95 :6-45] vs. 45% [CI95 : 34-59], p < 0.01) and DEL (2 years OS 33% [CI95 : 20-56], vs. 50% [CI95 : 41-60], p < 0.05) had lower OS than non-DHL and non-DEL/non-DHL counterparts, respectively. COO by IHC or GEP was not associated with OS in R/R DLBCL while DHL and DEL were adverse prognostic markers in DLBCL at first relapse.

Cost-utility and value of information analysis of tisagenlecleucel for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the Irish healthcare setting

BACKGROUND

The evidence base of tisagenlecleucel is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel. To conduct expected value of perfect information (EVPI) and partial EVPI (EVPPI) analyses.

STUDY DESIGN

A three-state partitioned survival model. A short-term decision tree partitioned patients in the tisagenlecleucel arm according to infusion status. Survival was extrapolated to 5 years; general population mortality with a standardised mortality ratio was then applied. EVPI and EVPPI were scaled up to population according to the incidence of the decision.

SETTING

Irish healthcare payer.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL).

INTERVENTIONS

Tisagenlecleucel versus Salvage Chemotherapy (with or without haematopoietic stem cell transplant).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Population EVPI and EVPPI.

RESULTS

At list prices, the ICER was €119,509 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (incremental costs €218,092; incremental QALYs 1.82). Probability of cost-effectiveness, at a €45,000 per QALY threshold, was 0%. Population EVPI was €0.00. Population EVPI, at the price of tisagenlecleucel that reduced the ICER to €45,000 per QALY, was €3,989,438. Here, survival analysis had the highest population EVPPI (€1,128,053).

CONCLUSION

Tisagenlecleucel is not cost-effective, versus salvage chemotherapy (with or without haematopoietic stem cell transplant), for R/R DLBCL in Ireland. At list prices, further research to decrease decision uncertainty may not be of value.

The frequency of differentiated CD3+CD27-CD28- T cells predicts response to CART cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy targeting the B cell specific differentiation antigen CD19 has shown clinical efficacy in a subset of relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Despite this heterogeneous response, blood pre-infusion biomarkers predicting responsiveness to CART cell therapy are currently understudied.

Methods

Blood cell and serum markers, along with clinical data of DLBCL patients who were scheduled for CART cell therapy were evaluated to search for biomarkers predicting CART cell responsiveness.

Findings

Compared to healthy controls (n=24), DLBCL patients (n=33) showed significant lymphopenia, due to low CD3⁺CD4⁺ T helper and CD3^-CD56⁺ NK cell counts, while cytotoxic CD3⁺CD8⁺ T cell counts were similar. Although lymphopenic, DLBCL patients had significantly more activated HLA-DR⁺ (P=0.005) blood T cells and a higher frequency of differentiated CD3⁺CD27^-CD28^- (28.7 ± 19.0% versus 6.6 ± 5.8%; P<0.001) T cells. Twenty-six patients were infused with CART cells (median 81 days after leukapheresis) and were analyzed for the overall response (OR) 3 months later. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that low levels of differentiated CD3⁺CD27^-CD28^- T cells (23.3 ± 19.3% versus 35.1 ± 18.0%) were independently associated with OR. This association was even more pronounced when patients were stratified for complete remission (CR versus non-CR: 13.7 ± 11.7% versus 37.7 ± 17.4%, P=0.001). A cut-off value of ≤ 18% of CD3⁺CD27^-CD28^- T cells predicted CR at 12 months with high accuracy (P<0.001). In vitro, CD3⁺CD8⁺CD27^-CD28^- compared to CD3⁺CD8⁺CD27⁺CD28⁺ CART cells displayed similar CD19⁺ target cell-specific cytotoxicity, but were hypoproliferative and produced less cytotoxic cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α). CD3⁺CD8⁺ T cells outperformed CD3⁺CD4⁺ T cells 3- to 6-fold in terms of their ability to kill CD19⁺ target cells.

Interpretation

Low frequency of differentiated CD3⁺CD27^-CD28^- T cells at leukapheresis represents a novel pre-infusion blood biomarker predicting a favorable response to CART cell treatment in r/r DLBCL patients.

Distinct Genetically Determined Origins of Myd88/BCL2-Driven Aggressive Lymphoma Rationalize Targeted Therapeutic Intervention Strategies

Genomic profiling revealed the identity of at least 5 subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including the MCD/C5 cluster characterized by aberrations in MYD88, BCL2, PRDM1, and/or SPIB. We generated mouse models harboring B cell-specific Prdm1 or Spib aberrations on the background of oncogenic Myd88 and Bcl2 lesions. We deployed whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome, flow-cytometry, and mass cytometry analyses to demonstrate that Prdm1- or Spib-altered lymphomas display molecular features consistent with prememory B cells and light-zone B cells, whereas lymphomas lacking these alterations were enriched for late light-zone and plasmablast-associated gene sets. Consistent with the phenotypic evidence for increased B cell receptor signaling activity in Prdm1-altered lymphomas, we demonstrate that combined BTK/BCL2 inhibition displays therapeutic activity in mice and in five of six relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients. Moreover, Prdm1-altered lymphomas were immunogenic upon transplantation into immuno-competent hosts, displayed an actionable PD-L1 surface expression, and were sensitive to antimurine-CD19-CAR-T cell therapy, in vivo.

SIGNIFICANCE

Relapsed/refractory DLBCL remains a major medical challenge, and most of these patients succumb to their disease. Here, we generated mouse models, faithfully recapitulating the biology of MYD88-driven human DLBCL. These models revealed robust preclinical activity of combined BTK/BCL2 inhibition. We confirmed activity of this regimen in pretreated non-GCB-DLBCL patients. See related commentary by Leveille et al., p. 8. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.

Lisocabtagene Maraleucel in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: What is the Evidence?

Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is an autologous CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell product, with a CD3ζ activatory domain connected to 4-1BB costimulatory domain. Liso-cel, unlike the other two approved products-axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel-is manufactured separately from CD4 and CD8 T cells and then administered as a sequential infusion of the two components at equal target doses. The approval of liso-cel was based on the results of Transcend NHL 001, a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, seamless design trial that enrolled 344 patients, of whom 269 received conforming liso-cel. The most common histology was diffuse large B cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL NOS; n = 137, 51%) followed by DLBCL transformed from indolent lymphomas (n = 78, 29%). Encouraging results were reported, yielding an objective response rate across all dose levels of 73% [complete remission (CR) = 53%], with an estimated duration of response at 1 year of 55% for all patients and 65% for those achieving a CR. The estimated 12-month overall survival was 58% for all patients and 86% for those achieving a CR. Cytokine release syndrome and neurological adverse events were reported in 42% and 30%, respectively. This review summarizes the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of liso-cel, resulting in its addition to the current treatment armamentarium of relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma.

Dual epigenetic agents plus rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin as salvage treatment in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients failure of salvage chemotherapy

Refractory/relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients' failure of salvage chemotherapy had extremely worse prognoses. Herein, 14 R/R DLBCL patients failed to salvage chemotherapy were exposed to dual epigenetic agents (Chidamide 30 mg biw*2w and Decitabine 10 mg/m² qd*d1-d5) and sequential R-GemOx (rituximab 375 mg/m² qd d6; gemcitabine 1 g/m² d7, d14; and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² d7) for further salvage chemotherapy. Finally, 11/14(78.6%) patients achieved overall response with 6/14(42.9%) achieving complete remission and 2-year overall survival (OS)/progression free survival (PFS) rate was 42.7%, extremely higher than reported previously. Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that 2-year OS/PFS rate was significantly higher in patients achieved complete/partial remission or with low international prognosis index (IPI 0-2) than that in patients with steady disease or high IPI (3-5). Common grade 3-4 adverse events were hematological toxicities. All toxicities were transient and reversible. Our report implicates that combination of dual epigenetic agents and R-GemOx is a safe and promising alternative for R/R DLBCL patients.

The Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation Combination-Based Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Improves Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Central Nervous System B-Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to explore the effectiveness and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in advanced relapsed/refractory central nervous system B-cell lymphoma and compare the impact of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) plus CAR T-cell therapy versus sequential CART therapy on the survival of patients.

METHODS

The retrospective analysis was based on the data of 17 patients with advanced relapsed/refractory central nervous system B-cell lymphoma. Bridging chemotherapy was applied before CAR T-cell infusion to further reduce the tumor burden. For patients with autologous hematopoietic stem cell successful collection, CD19/20/22CAR T-cell immunotherapy following ASCT was performed with the thiotepa-containing conditioning regimen, while sequential CD19/CD20/CD22CAR T-cell therapy was applied. For lymphodepletion, patients received bendamustine or fludarabine monotherapy or fludarabine combined with cyclophosphamide pre-CART-cell infusion.

RESULTS

Out of the 17 patients, 8 completed ASCT plus CART cell therapy, while 9 patients completed CART cell alone therapy. In efficacy assessment at 3 months after infusion, the objective response rate (ORR) was 12/17 (71%) and the complete response rate (CRR) was 11/17 (65%). The CRR of the ASCT group and non-ASCT was 100% and 44.4%, respectively (P < 0.01). The median progression-free survival was 16.3 (2.6-24.5) months, and the median overall survival was 19.3 (6-24.5) months. Patients who underwent ASCT plus CART cell therapy had significantly longer PFS (P < 0.01) and OS (P < 0.01). Grade 3 or higher immune effector cell-associated neurologic toxicity syndrome (≥grade 3 ICANS) and cytokine release syndrome (≥grade 3 CRS) events occurred in 29% and 41% of the patients, respectively. No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSION

The CAR T-cell therapy could augment its efficacy in the treatment of advanced relapsed/refractory CNS B-cell lymphoma, while ASCT in combination with CART can induce durable responses and OS with a manageable side effect.

The path towards consensus genome classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma for use in clinical practice

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a widely heterogeneous disease in presentation, treatment response and outcome that results from a broad biological heterogeneity. Various stratification approaches have been proposed over time but failed to sufficiently capture the heterogeneous biology and behavior of the disease in a clinically relevant manner. The most recent DNA-based genomic subtyping studies are a major step forward by offering a level of refinement that could serve as a basis for exploration of personalized and targeted treatment for the years to come. To enable consistent trial designs and allow meaningful comparisons between studies, harmonization of the currently available knowledge into a single genomic classification widely applicable in daily practice is pivotal. In this review, we investigate potential avenues for harmonization of the presently available genomic subtypes of DLBCL inspired by consensus molecular classifications achieved for other malignancies. Finally, suggestions for laboratory techniques and infrastructure required for successful clinical implementation are described.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is superior to standard of care as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care (SOC) second-line treatment for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, outcomes remain suboptimal. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety of SOC versus chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy as second-line for patients with LBCL refractory or relapsing within 12 months. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Three trials published in 2021 (involving 865 participants) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. EFS as well as OS were significantly improved with CAR-T therapy as compared to SOC, hazard ratio (HR) 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.68) and HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.98) respectively. CAR-T therapy was associated with significantly better ORR, relative risk (RR) 1.55 (95% CI 1.12-2.13, p = 0.001). The risk of Grade III/IV adverse event was comparable between the two arms, RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.93-1.14). In summary, CAR-T therapy has superior outcomes as compared to SOC in patients with LBCL refractory or relapsing within 12 months, without excess of toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results and determine the optimal sequencing of CAR-T therapy in the management of LBCL.

Role of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Second-Line Large B Cell Lymphoma: Lessons from Phase 3 Trials. An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Since 2017, 3 CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies-axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel-have been approved for relapsed/refractory aggressive diffuse large B cell lymphoma after 2 lines of therapy. Recently, 3 prospective phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted to define the optimal second-line treatment by comparing each of the CAR T cell products to the current standard of care: ZUMA-7 for axicabtagene ciloleucel, BELINDA for tisagenlecleucel, and TRANSFORM for lisocabtagene maraleucel. These 3 studies, although largely addressing the same question, had different outcomes, with ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM demonstrating significant improvement with CD19 CAR T cells in second-line therapy compared with standard of care but BELINDA not showing any benefit. The US Food and Drug Administration has now approved axicabtagene ciloleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel for LBCL that is refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy or relapse occurring within 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Following the reporting of these practice changing studies, here a group of experts convened by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy provides a comprehensive review of the 3 studies, emphasizing potential differences, and shares perspectives on what these results mean to clinical practice in this new era of treatment of B cell lymphomas.

Matching-adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Efficacy of Loncastuximab Tesirine Versus Treatment in the Chemoimmunotherapy Era for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) have been assessed in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL), but direct evidence from head-to-head randomized clinical trials is not available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of Lonca versus CIT-era treatment in R/R DLBCL. The analysis used individual patient data from the phase II LOTIS-2 trial of Lonca (NCT03589469) and pooled aggregated data from 2 extension studies of the CORAL trial for CIT. The LOTIS-2 trial included 145 patients who had relapsed or progressed following 2 or more multi-agent systemic treatment regimens; the CORAL extension studies included 203 patients who received 2 prior lines of therapy and 75 patients who relapsed after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. MAIC analyses were performed to adjust for cross-trial differences in inclusion/exclusion criteria and the distribution of observed baseline characteristics. Overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the balanced trial populations.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients in LOTIS-2 were included in the analysis. After matching to the characteristics of 278 patients from the pooled CORAL extension studies, the ORR was significantly higher for Lonca compared with CIT-era treatment (53.4% vs. 40.3%, P < .05). Lonca was also associated with a significantly improved OS compared with CIT-era treatment (median OS 10.8 vs. 6.4 months; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.48, 0.92], P < .05).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that Lonca was associated with significantly improved efficacy compared with CIT-era treatments for R/R DLBCL.

Radiation Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: What Is the Right Regimen for Palliation?

Purpose

To report objective response rates (ORR), time to local failure (TTLF), and overall survival (OS) among patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after salvage- or palliative-intent radiation therapy (RT) and to investigate whether outcomes differed with conventional versus hypofractionated (≥2.5 Gy/fraction) RT.

Methods and Materials

A single-institution observational cohort study was performed for patients who completed a course of RT for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma between January 1, 2008, and April 1, 2020. Predictors of ORR, TTLF, and OS were calculated using univariable and multivariable regression models. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate TTLF and OS, and log-rank analysis was used to compare outcomes. Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was calculated using an α/β of 10.

Results

One-hundred and sixty-nine patients were treated with 205 RT courses (73 [36%] salvage, 132 [64%] palliative), and hypofractionated RT was used in 100 RT courses (49%). Median RT dose was 30 Gy (range, 8-60 Gy). ORR was 60% for the total cohort (53% and 69% for palliative and salvage cohorts, respectively). Over a median follow-up time of 4 months, median OS in all patients was 5 months (3 and 22 months for palliative and salvage cohorts, respectively). No statistically significant differences in ORR, TTLF, and OS were observed with hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation. EQD2 ≥35 Gy was associated with improved ORR (odds ratio, 3.79 [1.19-12.03]; P = .024) and prolonged TTLF (0.39 [0.18-0.87]; P = .022), while double-hit receptor status (8.18 [1.08-62.05]; P = .042), cell of origin (3.87 [1.17-8.74]; P = .0012), and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm; 2.12 [1.18-3.81]; P = .012) were associated with inferior TTLF. In the palliative-only cohort, a low-dose regimen of 8 Gy in 2 fractions was associated with similar ORR compared with other fractionation schema but trended towards inferior TTLF (P = .36).

Conclusions

Hypofractionation is not associated with differences in disease outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, while higher RT dose (EQD2 ≥35 Gy) may improve ORR and TTLF. Future work is warranted to elucidate the ideal dose and fractionation schema for such patients who will likely also undergo novel systemic agents and cellular therapies.

Effect of Prior Therapy and Disease Refractoriness on the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): A Post-hoc Analysis of the SADAL Study

BACKGROUND

Despite a number of treatment options, patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease has become refractory to treatment have a poor prognosis. Selinexor is a novel, oral drug that is approved to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this post hoc analysis of the SADAL study, a multinational, open-label study, we evaluated subpopulations to determine if response to single agent selinexor is impacted by number of lines of prior treatment, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), response to first and most recent therapies, and time to progressive disease.

PATIENTS

Patients (n = 134) with DLBCL after 2-5 prior therapies were enrolled in SADAL and received 60mg selinexor twice weekly.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 9.0 months and median progression free survival was 2.6 months. Patients who had the best overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were those who had prior ASCT (42.5% and 50.0%) or responded to last line of therapy (35.9% and 43.5%). Patients with primary refractory DLBCL also showed responses (ORR 21.8%). Adverse events between subgroups were similar to the overall study population, the most common being thrombocytopenia (29.1%), fatigue (7.5%), and nausea (6.0%).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of prior therapy and disease refractory status, selinexor treatment demonstrated results consistent with its novel mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance. Thus, single agent oral selinexor can induce deep, durable, and tolerable responses in patients with DLBCL who have recurrent disease after several chemoimmunotherapy combination regimens.

Salvage High-dose Melphalan With Autologous Stem cell Transplantation as Bridge to Consolidation Therapy for Chemoresistant Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma not responding to salvage chemotherapy have a dismal prognosis. CAR T-cells or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) are potentially curative approaches. However, obtaining a remission, and lowering tumor burden before consolidation seems crucial for long-term efficacy of both treatment modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed patients with chemoresistant aggressive B-cell lymphoma, defined as being refractory or progressive to at least second line salvage chemotherapy including the regimen immediately preceding autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), treated at 2 tertiary centers, who were eligible for intensive treatment using single agent high-dose (HD) melphalan to obtain a remission before consolidating therapy.

RESULTS

We identified 36 patients that received single agent HD melphalan and ASCT as remission induction followed by CAR T-cells or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Thirteen of the evaluable patients (39.4%) achieved a partial remission and 9 patients (27.73%) a complete remission, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 66.7%. High remission rates were seen across all subgroups including patients with primary refractory lymphoma (ORR 58.3%), uncontrolled disease and high tumor burden as indicated by increased LDH levels (ORR 66.7% for patients with elevated LDH above 2 times upper limit of norm). 22 patients proceeded to allogeneic SCT and 5 to CAR T-cell therapy. Treatment related mortality of ASCT was 5.5% (2 patients, both due to infections). Two-year overall survival of all patients was 15.8%, primarily due to a high non-relapse mortality (45.5%) of allogeneic SCT patients treated with myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Single agent HD melphalan produces high remission rates in patients with chemoresistant, uncontrolled aggressive B-cell lymphoma and provides a window of opportunity for consolidation therapy.

MICROABSTRACT

Patient with refractory/relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma after salvage therapy are an unmet medical need because of their very poor prognosis. In our retrospective analysis of 36 patients we showed that single agent high-dose melphalan can achieve high response rates (ORR 66.7%) even in uncontrolled disease enabling consolidation therapy e.g. with allogeneic stem cell transplantation or CAR T-cell therapy.

The Nitrogen Mustards

The nitrogen mustards are powerful cytotoxic and lymphoablative agents and have been used for more than 60 years. They are employed in the treatment of cancers, sarcomas, and hematologic malignancies. Cyclophosphamide, the most versatile of the nitrogen mustards, also has a place in stem cell transplantation and the therapy of autoimmune diseases. Adverse effects caused by the nitrogen mustards on the central nervous system, kidney, heart, bladder, and gonads remain important issues. Advances in analytical techniques have facilitated the investigation of the pharmacokinetics of the nitrogen mustards, especially the oxazaphosphorines, which are prodrugs requiring metabolic activation. Enzymes involved in the metabolism of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide are very polymorphic, but a greater understanding of the pharmacogenomic influences on their activity has not yet translated into a personalized medicine approach. In addition to damaging DNA, the nitrogen mustards can act through other mechanisms, such as antiangiogenesis and immunomodulation. The immunomodulatory properties of cyclophosphamide are an area of current exploration. In particular, cyclophosphamide decreases the number and activity of regulatory T cells, and the interaction between cyclophosphamide and the intestinal microbiome is now recognized as an important factor. New derivatives of the nitrogen mustards continue to be assessed. Oxazaphosphorine analogs have been synthesized in attempts to both improve efficacy and reduce toxicity, with varying degrees of success. Combinations of the nitrogen mustards with monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule targeted agents are being evaluated. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The nitrogen mustards are important, well-established therapeutic agents that are used to treat a variety of diseases. Their role is continuing to evolve.

Cost drivers associated with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in Japan: A structural equation model (SEM) analysis

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of increasing prevalence in Japan. However, patients with relapsed or refractory disease to first line treatment (rrDLBCL) have been found to shoulder greater economic burden and have poor survival with subsequent lines of therapy. The relative impact of individual patient attributes on total medical cost among patients with rrDLBCL receiving second or third line (2L/3L) therapy was assessed. Structural equation modelling was used to identify potential cost drivers of total medical costs incurred by treatment and procedures in a Japanese retrospective claims database. From the database, rrDLBCL patients on 2L or 3L of treatment were grouped into respective cohorts. The mean [median] (SD) total medical cost of care for the 2L cohort was 73,296.40 [58,223.11] (58,409.79) US dollars (USD) and 75,238.35 [60,477.31] (59,583.66) USD for the 3L cohort. The largest total effect on medical cost in both cohorts was length of hospital stay (LOS) (β: 0.750 [95%CI: 0.728, 0.772] vs β: 0.762 [95%CI: 0.729, 0.794]). Length of hospital stay and potential heart disease complications due to line of treatment were the primary drivers of total cost for patients who had received at least 2L or 3L therapy for rrDLBCL.

Glofitamab Treatment in Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL after CAR T-Cell Therapy

Simple Summary

CAR T-cell therapies represent a major advance in the treatment of relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of these patients will experience disease progression following CAR T treatment. For these patients, no standard therapeutic procedure is established so far. The novel bispecific antibody glofitamab has shown promising activity in the treatment of refractory or relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. In this study, we provide evidence for good tolerance and promising efficacy of glofitamab administration in patients relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy.

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR T) treatment has become a standard option for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL), which are refractory or relapse after two prior lines of therapy. However, little evidence exists for treatment recommendations in patients who relapse after CAR T-cell treatment and the outcome for such patients is poor. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a monotherapy with the bispecific CD20xCD3 antibody glofitamab in patients who progressed after CAR T treatment. We report nine consecutive patients with progressive DLBCL after preceding CAR T-cell therapy. The patients received a maximum of 12 cycles of glofitamab after a single obinutuzumab pre-treatment at an academic institution. CRS was observed in two patients (grade 2 in both patients). We observed an overall response rate of 67%, with four patients achieving a complete response and a partial remission in two patients. Interestingly, we identified increased persistence of circulating CAR T-cells in peripheral blood in three of the five patients with measurable CAR T-cells. Our data suggest that glofitamab treatment is well tolerated and effective in patients with DLBCL relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy and can enhance residual CAR T-cell activity.

PET2 response associated with survival in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of two independent prospective cohorts

Studies evaluating Positron Emission Tomography scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (PET2) in newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are heterogeneous in patient characteristics, treatments and have conflicting results. Here we report association of PET2 with outcomes in two large independent prospective cohorts of newly diagnosed DLBCL pts treated with two RCHOP-based regimens. The discovery cohort consisted of pts enrolled in single arm phase 2 MC078E study of lenalidomide with RCHOP (R2CHOP). The validation cohort consisted of RCHOP-treated pts from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort. Pts who received 3-6 cycles of therapy and had PET2 were included in the study. Patients who progressed on PET2 were excluded. Revised response criteria 2007 were used to define PET2 response PET2 positive (PET2 + ) pts had inferior EFS [24-month EFS 45.5% vs 87.9%, HR 4.0, CI₉₅ (2.1-7.9), p < 0.0001) with a trend towards lower OS [24-months OS 77% vs 94.8%, HR 2.0, CI₉₅ (0.9-4.8), P = 0.1] than PET2 negative (PET2-) pts in MC078E cohort. PET2 + pts had an inferior EFS (24 month EFS 48.7% vs 81.6%, HR 2.9, CI₉₅ 2.0-4.2, p < 0.0001) and OS (24-month OS 68.6% vs 88.1%, HR 2.3, CI₉₅: 1.5-3.5, p < 0.0001) in the MER cohort. These results were consistent regardless of age, sex and in the subgroup of advanced stage and high-risk international prognostic index (IPI). For MER, PET2 + pts also had higher odds of positive end of treatment PET (OR: 17.3 (CI₉₅ 7.9-37.7), p < 0.001). PET2 is an early predictor DLBCL pts at high risk of progression and death in two independent prospective cohorts. PET2-guided risk-adapted strategies may improve outcomes, and should be explored in clinical trials.

Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Moving beyond Rituximab

Although rituximab has revolutionized the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a significant proportion of patients experience refractory disease or relapse early after the end of treatment. The lack of effective treatment options in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting had made the prognosis of these patients dismal. The initial enthusiasm for novel anti-CD20 antibodies had been short-lived as they failed to prove their superiority to rituximab. Therefore, research has focused on developing novel agents with a unique mechanism of action. Among them, two antibody-drug conjugates, namely polatuzumab vedotin (PolaV) and loncastuximab tesirine, along with tafasitamab, an anti-CD19 bioengineered antibody, have been approved for the treatment of R/R DLBCL. Whereas PolaV has been FDA and EMA approved, EMA has not approved loncastuximab tesirine and tafasitamab yet. Results from randomized trials, as well as real-life data for PolaV have been promising. Novel agents as bispecific antibodies bridging CD3 on T-cells to CD20 have shown very promising results in clinical trials and are expected to gain approval for treatment of R/R DLBCL soon. As the therapeutic armamentarium against DLBCL is expanding, an improvement in survival of patients with R/R and higher cure rates might soon become evident.

DLBCL 1L—What to Expect beyond R-CHOP?

Simple Summary

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. About two-thirds of patients are cured by the first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC), the R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisolone) immunochemotherapy protocol. The profound molecular heterogeneity of DLBCL is the underlying reason why many patients, despite improved next-line options, eventually succumb to the disease. Hence, enhancing the efficacy of 1L treatment is critical for improving long-term outcomes in DLBCL. A plethora of novel treatment options with potential in later lines is currently under evaluation in 1L settings. We summarize here the established and emerging strategies for newly diagnosed DLBCL and emphasize the need for individualized treatment decisions.

Abstract

The R-CHOP immunochemotherapy protocol has been the first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients for decades and is curative in approximately two-thirds of patients. Numerous randomized phase III trials, most of them in an “R-CHOP ± X” design, failed to further improve outcomes. This was mainly due to increased toxicity, the large proportion of patients not in need of more than R-CHOP, and the extensive molecular heterogeneity of the disease, raising the bar for “one-size-fits-all” concepts. Recently, an R-CHP regimen extended by the anti-CD79b antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) Polatuzumab Vedotin proved superior to R-CHOP in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) in the POLARIX phase III trial. Moreover, a number of targeted agents, especially the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor Ibrutinib, seem to have activity in certain patient subsets in 1L and are currently being tested in front-line regimens. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, achieving remarkable results in ≥3L scenarios, are being exploited in earlier lines of therapy, while T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies emerge as conceptual competitors of CAR T-cells. Hence, we present here the findings and lessons learnt from phase III 1L trials and piloting phase II studies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) and 1L settings, and survey chemotherapy-free regimens with respect to their efficacy and future potential in 1L. Novel agents and their mode of action will be discussed in light of the molecular landscape of DLBCL and personalized 1L perspectives for the challenging patient population not cured by the SOC.

Selective inhibition of nuclear export: a promising approach in the shifting treatment paradigms for hematological neoplasms

Novel targeted therapeutics alone or in rational combinations are likely to dominate the future management of various hematological neoplasms. However, the challenges currently faced are the molecular heterogeneity in driver lesions and genetic plasticity leading to multiple resistance pathways. Thus, progress has overall been gradual. For example, despite the advent of targeted agents against actionable drivers like FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the prognosis remains suboptimal in newly diagnosed and dismal in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting, due to other molecular abnormalities contributing to inherent and acquired treatment resistance. Nuclear export inhibitors are of keen interest because they can inhibit several active tumorigenic processes simultaneously and also synergize with other targeted drugs and chemotherapy. XPO1 (or CRM1, chromosome maintenance region 1) is one of the most studied exportins involved in transporting critical cargoes, including tumor suppressor proteins like p27, p53, and RB1. Apart from the TSP cargo transport and its role in drug resistance, XPO1 inhibition results in retention of master transcription factors essential for cell differentiation, cell survival, and autophagy, rendering cells more susceptible to the effects of other antineoplastic agents, including targeted therapies. This review will dissect the role of XPO1 inhibition in hematological neoplasms, focusing on mechanistic insights gleaned mainly from work with SINE compounds. Future potential combinatorial strategies will be discussed.

Real-world data on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 2010-2019: usability of large data sets of Finnish hospital data lakes

Background: Real-world data on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has remained incomplete. In Finland, health record data originally recorded in different hospital data record systems are collectively available via data lake technology, enabling efficient extraction and analysis of large data sets. The usability of Finnish data lake data in the assessment of DLBCL was evaluated. Methods: Adult DLBCL patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019, home municipality in the Hospital District of Southwest Finland and data available in respective data lake were included. Results: The algorithmic determination of treatment lines and respective survival was successful. Patient characterization was feasible, albeit partly incomplete because of limited data content/availability and coverage. Stage, International Prognostic Index and cell of origin were available for 63.0, 68.3 and 28.4% of patients, respectively. Genetic aberrations were not structurally available or feasible to extract without a manual chart review. Conclusion: Finnish data lakes represent an efficient way to analyze large DLBCL data sets. The current study provides a tool for developing recording practices in routine care.

Translating the Biology of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Into Treatment

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is characterized by clinical and molecular heterogeneity; however, this heterogeneity is rarely taken into account by standard-of-care treatment approaches. While the disease was traditionally classified based on transcriptome signatures purporting the tumor cell of origin, recent classification systems have further differentiated these subtypes into clusters based on molecular and genetic features. Alongside a better understanding of the biology of the disease and the signaling pathways involved, emerging therapeutic agents may be better aimed at attacking distinct disease subsets. It is hoped that molecular subtyping at diagnosis will allow patients to be allocated to the appropriate treatment that targets their specific disease subtype, thus advancing the promise of precision medicine in lymphoma, an approach that is most needed. For high-risk disease subsets, this is particularly important, and much research is still needed to develop agents effective in this population. Here, we review recent advances in DLBCL biology and how they can be translated into clinical care.

Indirect Comparison of Tisagenlecleucel and Historical Treatments for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

OS and ORR of tisagenlecleucel were compared with those of historical therapy for r/r DLBCL after ≥2 therapy lines.

Tisagenlecleucel was associated with significantly longer OS and higher response rate vs historical therapy.

No head-to-head trials have compared the efficacy of tisagenlecleucel vs historical treatments for adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). This study indirectly compared the overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) associated with tisagenlecleucel, using data from the JULIET study (Study of Efficacy and Safety of CTL019 in Adult DLBCL Patients; #NCT02445248), vs historical treatments assessed in the CORAL (Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma) study follow-up population. To assess treatment effects in the treated (full analysis set [FAS]) and enrolled (intention-to-treat [ITT]) study populations, the JULIET FAS vs the CORAL follow-up FAS and JULIET ITT vs CORAL follow-up ITT populations were separately compared. Propensity score weighting using standardized mortality ratio weight (SMRW) and fine stratification weight (FSW) was used to compare OS and ORR, adjusting for baseline confounders. The results indicated that tisagenlecleucel was associated with a lower hazard of death among the FAS (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], both FSW and SMRW, 0.44 [0.32, 0.59]) and ITT populations (FSW, 0.60 [0.44, 0.77]; SMRW, 0.57 [0.44, 0.73]; all, P < .001). Median OS was 12.48 months (JULIET) vs 4.34 to 4.40 months (CORAL) for the FAS, and 8.25 (JULIET) months vs 4.04 to 4.86 (CORAL) months for the ITT populations. Tisagenlecleucel was associated with a significantly higher ORR compared with historical treatments among the FAS (adjusted response rate difference [95% confidence interval], both FSW and SMRW, 36% [22%, 0.48%]; P < .001) and among the ITT populations after SMRW adjustment (11% [0%, 22%]; P = .043). This analysis supports that improved response and OS are achieved in patients with r/r DLBCL treated with tisagenlecleucel compared with those treated with alternative historical treatments.

Long-term remissions in patients with early relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma following high-dose chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, and radiotherapy of residual disease

PURPOSE

The prognosis of an early relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) appears to be poor following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The aim of this study is to contribute data to the open question on whether additional radiotherapy can improve the outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with an early relapse (median 4 months after the end of initial immunochemotherapy, range 1-11) of DLBCL have been treated in our institution with high-dose therapy (usually the BEAM protocol) and ASCT since 2008 (median age 61 years, range 28-73). Twenty-three patients received ASCT in a second treatment line, 25 in a third line (19 refractory to second-line salvage therapy, 5 after second relapse). Fifteen of these 48 patients received radiotherapy (36-50 Gy, median 40) of residual masses after ASCT.

RESULTS

Three-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after second-line ASCT were 61 and 57%, after third-line ASCT 47 and 44%, respectively, without significant differences. A prognostic factor was the International Prognostic Index (IPI) at the start of salvage therapy. Three-year OS and PFS in low-risk patients were 69 and 69%, in low-intermediate-risk 63 and 53%, and in high-intermediate-risk 23 and 23%, respectively (p = 0.033). Twenty-three patients achieved a sustained complete remission (13-146 months, median 62).

CONCLUSION

Sustained long-term remissions can be achieved in patients with early relapse of DLBCL following ASCT in a second or third treatment line, particularly in patients with low- and low-intermediate-risk IPI, following radiotherapy of residual disease after ASCT. Further investigations are required to clarify which patients need an alternative therapy (potentially CAR T‑cells or allogeneic transplantation).

Comparison of 2-year outcomes with CAR T cells (ZUMA-1) vs salvage chemotherapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma

Propensity analysis confirmed substantially higher ORR and a 73% reduction in risk for death with axi-cel vs standard salvage regimens.

This 2-year analysis indicates that axi-cel is associated with durable clinical benefit for patients with refractory LBCL.

The SCHOLAR-1 international retrospective study highlighted poor clinical outcomes and survival among patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with conventional chemotherapy. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, demonstrated durable responses in patients with refractory LBCL in the pivotal phase 1/2 ZUMA-1 study (NCT02348216). Here, we compared SCHOLAR-1 with the 2-year outcomes of ZUMA-1. Prior to comparison of clinical outcomes, propensity scoring (based on a broad set of prognostic covariates) was used to create balance between ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 patients. In the pivotal phase 2 portion of ZUMA-1, 101 patients received axi-cel and were evaluable for response and survival. In SCHOLAR-1, 434 and 424 patients were evaluable for response and survival, respectively. ZUMA-1 patients were more heavily pretreated than were SCHOLAR-1 patients. The median follow-up was 27.1 months in ZUMA-1. The objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate were 83% and 54% in ZUMA-1 vs 34% and 12% in SCHOLAR-1, respectively. The 2-year survival rate was 54% in ZUMA-1 and 20% in SCHOLAR-1, and a 73% reduction in the risk of death was observed in ZUMA-1 vs SCHOLAR-1. These results were consistent with those of an additional standardization analysis in which strata were limited to 2 prognostic factors (refractory categorization and presence/absence of stem cell transplant after refractoriness to chemotherapy) to conserve sample size. Despite the limitations of a nonrandomized analysis, these results indicate that axi-cel produces durable responses and a substantial survival benefit vs non–CAR T-cell salvage regimens for patients with refractory LBCL.

Prognostic Role of Serum Albumin Level in Patients with Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) plays a crucial role in the therapy of patients with lymphoma. This retrospective study aimed to analyze prognostic factors in patients undergoing HDT/ASCT for lymphoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included patients with lymphoma who underwent HDT/ASCT at our center. Time-to-event outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to explore the prognostic value of different factors. RESULTS A total of 113 patients with lymphoma were included. Patients with low serum albumin levels (<37 g/L) before transplantation had significantly lower PFS and OS (P<0.01). Albumin levels before transplantation significantly predicted early progression (progressed within 1 year) after transplantation (AUC=0.706, P=0.003). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that low albumin level (hazard ratio [HR] 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-6.63; P=0.002) and age >60 years (HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.27-6.71; P=0.012) were independent risk factors for PFS. Total protein <60 g/L was an independent risk factor for OS (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.45-8.78; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS Low albumin level before transplantation was an independent risk factor in patients with lymphoma undergoing HDT/ASCT. Intense care and effective maintenance therapy after transplantation are required for patients with low albumin levels.

Efficacy and Safety of Innovative Experimental Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cells versus Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL): Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparisons (MAICs) and Systematic Review

Despite favorable results of CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL), several challenges remain, including incomplete response, immune-mediated toxicity, and antigen-loss relapse. We delineated the relative clinical benefit of the novel approaches compared to the currently approved CAR T-cell therapies. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons and randomized controlled trials, we performed Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparisons to quantify the relative efficacy and safety of experimental CARs against Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), the first FDA-approved CAR. A total of 182 R/R LBCL patients from 15 clinical trials with individual patient data (IPD) were pooled into eight populations by their CAR T-cell constructs and +/- ASCT status. The study endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS), grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and grade ≥ 3 neurotoxicity (NT). Tandem CD19.CD20.4-1BBζ CARs indicated favorable efficacy and safety, whereas the co-infusion of CD19 & CD20 with 4-1BBζ showed no clinical benefit compared to Yescarta. Third generation CD19. CD28. 4-1BBζ, and sequential administration of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and CD19. CARs presented statistically insignificant yet improved PFS and safety except for ASCT combined intervention which had suggestively higher NT risk than Yescarta. CARs with modified co-stimulatory domains to reduce toxicity (Hu19. CD8.28Zζ and CD19. BBz.86ζ) presented remarkable safety with no severe adverse events; however, both presented worse PFS than Yescarta. Third-generation CARs demonstrated statistically significantly lower NT than Yescarta. CD20. 4-1BBζ data suggested targeting CD20 antigen alone lacks clinical or safety benefit compared to Yescarta. Further comparisons with other FDA-approved CARs are needed.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A consensus practice statement from the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma subtype, accounting for 30-40% of lymphoma diagnoses. Though aggressive, cure is achievable in approximately 60% of cases with primary chemo-immunotherapy, and in a further substantial minority by salvage therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Despite promising activity in early phase clinical trials, no intensified or novel treatment regimen has improved outcomes over R-CHOP21 in randomised studies. However, there remain several areas of controversy including the most appropriate prognostic markers, CNS prophylaxis and the optimal treatment for patients with high-risk disease. This position statement presents an evidence-based synthesis of the literature for application in Australasian practice. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Is autologous transplant in relapsed DLBCL patients achieving only a PET+ PR appropriate in the CAR T-cell era?

For relapsed chemosensitive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), consolidation with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is a standard option. With the approval of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in 2017, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) reported a 45% decrease in the number of auto-HCTs for DLBCL in the United States. Using the CIBMTR database, we identified 249 relapsed DLBCL patients undergoing auto-HCT from 2003 to 2013 with a positive positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)+ partial response prior to transplant were identified. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups: early chemoimmunotherapy failure (ECF), defined as patients with primary refractory disease (PRefD) or relapse within 12 months of diagnosis and late chemoimmunotherapy failure, defined as patients relapsing after ≥12 months. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and relapse. A total of 182 patients had ECF, whereas 67 did not. Among ECF cohort, 79% had PRefD. The adjusted 5-year probabilities for PFS and OS (ECF vs no ECF) were not different: 41% vs 41% (P = .93) and 51% vs 63% (P = .09), respectively. On multivariate analysis, ECF patients had an increased risk for death (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.46; P = .03) but not for PFS or relapse. In conclusion, for relapsed chemosensitive DLBCL patients with residual PET/CT+ disease prior to auto-HCT, the adjusted 5-year PFS (41%) was comparable, irrespective of time to relapse. These data support ongoing application of auto-HCT in chemosensitive DLBCL.

The conditional survival analysis of relapsed DLBCL after autologous transplant: a subgroup analysis of LY.12 and CORAL

The conditional survival of patients after frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) approaches that of the general population once patients have survived disease free for 2 years. We sought to determine the conditional survival of patients among patients with relapsed de novo DLBCL successfully undergoing an autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) after first relapse. A total of 478 patients with de novo DLBCL, relapsed after 1 treatment from the Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) and LY.12, were included. Patients were followed prospectively after ASCT for a median of 5.3 and 8.2 years, respectively. Individual patient data were analyzed for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were estimated using French and Canadian life tables. The EFS estimates declined with each year of follow-up after ASCT and were 50.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.7% to 56.3%) and 43.4% (95% CI: 36.7% to 49.9%) at 5 years in CORAL and LY.12, respectively. The rate of death stabilized once patients achieved at least 4 years of EFS. Compared with the age- and sex-matched population, the SMR was significantly higher until 5 years after ASCT, when values were no longer statistically significant. Patients undergoing ASCT for relapsed DLBCL continue to have a higher rate of death at least until they have survived event free for 5 years. These observations can help to determine endpoints for future clinical trials in this population and for patient counseling. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00078949.

Extra copies of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 and outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with translocations involving MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 comprises ∼10% of cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and carries a poor prognosis. The incidence, prognosis, and optimal therapy for DLBCL harboring extra copies of the genes MYC, BCL2, and BCL6, rather than their genetic translocations, are unknown. In this retrospective, single-center study we identified 144 DLBCL cases including 46 patients with classic HGBL with double-hit or triple-hit chromosomal translocations (DHL), 55 with extra copies of MYC in addition to aberrations (extra copies or translocations) of BCL2 and/or BCL6 but did not meet the criteria for HGBL (EC group), and 43 without any aberrations of MYC, BCL2, or BCL6 (wild type [WT]). Unfavorable baseline characteristics had similar frequency in the EC and WT groups, but were significantly more prevalent in the DHL group. With a median follow-up of 36 months, the 2-year event-free survival (EFS) was similar between the WT and EC groups at 77% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65-90) and 82% (95% CI, 72-93), respectively. In contrast, the 2-year EFS of the DHL group was 63% (95% CI, 51-79). The 2-year overall survival in the WT, EC, and DHL groups was 86% (95% CI, 76-97), 89% (95% CI, 81-98), and 74% (95% CI, 62-88), respectively. Among patients treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), the EC group had outcomes similar to those of the WT group. Our results indicate that patients with DLBCL with extra gene copies of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 fare differently from those with HGBL and respond well to standard R-CHOP therapy.

2021 Update on Diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A review of current data and potential applications on risk stratification and management

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common type of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases with different biology, clinical presentations, and response to treatment. R-CHOP remains the mainstay of therapy and can achieve long-term disease control in nearly 90% of patients presenting with limited-stage and in up to 60% of those presenting with advanced stages. Advances on the understanding of the genetic landscape and molecular features of DLBCL have identified high-risk subsets with poor outcomes to chemo-immunotherapy that are actively being studied in clinical trials. Novel therapies could potentially improve outcomes for patients with high-risk disease. Studies evaluating risk-adapted therapy based on classification by cell of origin (COO) and molecular features are ongoing. Developments in the fields of immunotherapy, mostly with adoptive T-cell therapy, have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with relapsed refractory disease. In this review, we will summarize the recent data and discuss ongoing efforts to improve DLBCL treatment in the frontline and relapsed refractory settings.

Treatment Modalities and Survival Outcomes for Sinonasal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

This study utilizes a large population national database to comprehensively analyze prognosticators and overall survival (OS) outcomes of varying treatment modalities in a large cohort of sinonasal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SN-DLBCL) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for all SN-DLBCL cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier log-rank test determined differences in OS based on clinical covariates. Cox proportional-hazards analysis was used to determine clinical and sociodemographic covariates predictive of mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2,073 SN-DLBCL patients were included, consisting of 48% female with a mean age of 66.0 ± 16.2 years. Overall, 82% of patients were Caucasian, 74% had early-stage disease, and 49% had primary tumors in the paranasal sinuses. Early-stage patients were more likely to receive multi-agent chemoradiotherapy compared to multi-agent chemotherapy alone (P < .001). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed chemoradiotherapy to confer significantly greater OS improvements than chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; P < .001). However, subset analysis of late-stage patients demonstrated no significant differences in OS between these treatment modalities (P = .245). On multivariable analysis of chemotherapy patients treated post-2012, immunotherapy (HR = 0.51; P = .024) demonstrated significant OS benefits. However, subset analysis showed no significant advantage in OS with administering immunotherapy for late-stage patients (P = .326). Lastly, for all patients treated post-2012, those receiving immunotherapy had significantly improved OS compared to those not receiving immunotherapy (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment protocol selection differs between early- and late-stage SN-DLBCL patients. Early-stage patients receiving chemotherapy may benefit from immunotherapy as part of their treatment paradigm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Laryngoscope, 2021.

Radiation and CAR T-cell Therapy in Lymphoma: Future Frontiers and Potential Opportunities for Synergy

CAR T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment approach to patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies; however, there continues to be opportunity for improvement in treatment toxicity as well as response durability. Radiation therapy can play an important role in combined modality treatments for some patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy in various clinical settings. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for RT in the setting of CAR T-cell therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies and propose potential opportunities for future investigation of RT and CAR T-cell treatment synergy. Future research frontiers include investigation of hypotheses including radiation priming of CAR T-cell mediated death, pre-CAR T-cell tumor debulking with radiation therapy, and selection of high risk patients for early radiation salvage after CAR T cell therapy.