1
|
Azim HA, Niman SM, Partridge AH, Demeestere I, Ruggeri M, Colleoni M, Saura C, Shimizu C, Saetersdal AB, Kroep JR, Mailliez A, Warner E, Borges VF, Amant F, Gombos A, Kataoka A, Rousset-Jablonski C, Borstnar S, Takei J, Lee JE, Walshe JM, Ruíz-Borrego M, Moore HCF, Saunders C, Bjelic-Radisic V, Susnjar S, Cardoso F, Klar NJ, Spanic T, Ruddy K, Piccart M, Korde LA, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Pagani O, Peccatori FA. Fertility Preservation and Assisted Reproduction in Patients With Breast Cancer Interrupting Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy to Attempt Pregnancy. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2302292. [PMID: 38810178 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated time to pregnancy, efficacy and safety of fertility preservation, and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in women with early hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) desiring future pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS POSITIVE is an international, single-arm, prospective trial, in which 518 women temporarily interrupted adjuvant endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy. We evaluated menstruation recovery and factors associated with time to pregnancy and investigated if ART use was associated with achieving pregnancy. The cumulative incidence of BC-free interval (BCFI) events was estimated according to the use of ovarian stimulation at diagnosis. The median follow-up was 41 months. RESULTS Two hundred seventy-three patients (53%) reported amenorrhea at enrollment, of whom 94% resumed menses within 12 months. Among 497 patients evaluable for pregnancy, 368 (74%) reported at least one pregnancy. Young age was the main factor associated with shorter time to pregnancy with cumulative incidences of pregnancy by 1 year of 63.5%, 54.3%, and 37.7% for patients age <35, 35-39, and 40-42 years, respectively. One hundred and seventy-nine patients (36%) had embryo/oocyte cryopreservation at diagnosis, of whom 68 reported embryo transfer after enrollment. Cryopreserved embryo transfer was the only ART associated with higher chance of pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.75 to 4.95]). The cumulative incidence of BCFI events at 3 years was similar for women who underwent ovarian stimulation for cryopreservation at diagnosis, 9.7% (95% CI, 6.0 to 15.4), compared with those who did not, 8.7% (95% CI, 6.0 to 12.5). CONCLUSION In POSITIVE, fertility preservation using ovarian stimulation was not associated with short-term detrimental impact on cancer prognosis. Pregnancy rates were highest among those who underwent embryo/oocyte cryopreservation followed by embryo transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hatem A Azim
- Cairo Cure Oncology Center, Cairo, Egypt
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| | - Samuel M Niman
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Boston, MA
- Department of Data Science, Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Fertility Clinic, HUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Monica Ruggeri
- Program for Young Patients, International Breast Cancer Study Group, A Division of ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Colleoni
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Saura
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
- SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Chikako Shimizu
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Anna B Saetersdal
- Breast Cancer Unit, Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Audrey Mailliez
- Breast Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Ellen Warner
- Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Canadian Clinical Trials Group (CCTG), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Virginia F Borges
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Gynecologic Oncology Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Gombos
- Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Akemi Kataoka
- Breast Oncology Cancer, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Simona Borstnar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Junko Takei
- St Luke's International Hospital, Breast Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jeong Eon Lee
- Breast Division, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Clinical Research and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Janice M Walshe
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Manuel Ruíz-Borrego
- GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Virgen del Rocio Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Halle C F Moore
- Breast Oncology Program, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Christobel Saunders
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Breast Unit, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
- Medical University Graz, Department Gynaecology, Graz, Austria
- Austrian Breast and Colorectal Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria
| | - Snezana Susnjar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Natalie J Klar
- New York University Langone's Perlmutter Cancer Center, Breast Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Martine Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Larissa A Korde
- Breast and Melanoma Therapeutics, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Aron Goldhirsch
- International Breast Cancer Study Group, Division of ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
- IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Richard D Gelber
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Boston, MA
- Department of Data Science, Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, MA
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Olivia Pagani
- Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Lugano University, Lugano, Switzerland
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fedro A Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Charpentier P, Cavalieri M, Desmoulins I, Coutant C. [Live birth rates after breast cancer among women who desired a child]. Bull Cancer 2024; 111:463-472. [PMID: 38580527 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In France, the breast cancer is the most common cancer among women under the age of 40. From 38 to 70% of women have not fulfilled their parental plans at the time of diagnosis. The gonadotoxicity of the treatments and the follicular physiological decline linked to age can become an obstacle to this project. METHODS Among the patients, 386 were treated for breast cancer at the Centre Georges-François-Leclerc in Dijon between January 2011 and December 2018 were identified. 192 patients aged under 39 met the inclusion criteria. We excluded metastatic cancers, cancer in situ and pregnant patients at diagnosis. A total of 124 patients agreed to participate in the study. The included patients filled out a self-questionnaire. Data were collected from the patient's electronic medical. The primary endpoint of this study was the live birth rate. RESULT Among women who desired a child after breast cancer, the overall rate of live births was 36.2 % (21/58). Most achieved pregnancies were spontaneous (90.5 %). No factor was significantly associated with the absence of obtaining birth. Fertility was preserved by oocyte cryopreservation in 13.8 % of patients (17/124). The median time to conception in patients who received chemotherapy was 8 months [1.0-60.0] vs 2 months [1.0-7.0] in women who did not receive chemotherapy. DISCUSSION The non-negligible proportion of live births following spontaneous pregnancy after breast cancer allows us to be reassuring for patients. However, the emergence of new chemotherapy protocols whose consequences on long-term gonadotoxicity are still not well known requires further studies and prompts the promotion of fertility preservation as a precautionary measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Charpentier
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, CHU François-Mitterrand, Cote d'Or, Dijon, France.
| | - Mathilde Cavalieri
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, CHU François-Mitterrand, Cote d'Or, Dijon, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Centre Francois-Leclerc, 1, rue du Professeur-Marion, Cote d'Or, 21000 France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Centre Francois-Leclerc, 1, rue du Professeur-Marion, Cote d'Or, 21000 France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abrar SS, Norsa'adah B, Yahya MM, Isa JA, Zon EM. Survival probabilities and prognostic factors of pregnancy-associated breast cancer in Malaysian women. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2024; 67:76-85. [PMID: 37985950 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.23151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is a rare cancer. This study aimed to determine the survival probabilities and prognostic factors in patients with PABC. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted in two tertiary care hospitals in Kota Bharu. We included all patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed by histopathology while pregnant or within 2 years post-partum from 2001 through 2020. We matched patients with PABC to non-pregnant patients with breast cancer by age and year of diagnosis. The data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS A total of 35 cases of PABC and 70 non-PABC controls were recruited. The 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival probabilities for patients with PABC were 58.6%, 47.54%, and 38.03%, respectively. The patients with PABC had a non-significant difference in survival probabilities compared with non-PABC patients. The significant prognostic factors of PABC were age (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.96; P=0.001), advanced stage of cancer (aHR, 9.97; 95% CI, 3.96-25.2; P<0.001), and no surgery (aHR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.01-9.85; P=0.047). Pregnancy was not found to be an independent factor in the prognosis of PABC (aHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.39-1.28; P=0.266). CONCLUSION Women diagnosed with PABC had similar survival probabilities compared with non-PABC patients. Pregnancy was not an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer. This information can be useful when women with breast cancer are counseled and supported with the option of beginning treatment with pregnancy continuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S S Abrar
- Unit of Biostatistics and Research Methodology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
| | - Bachok Norsa'adah
- Unit of Biostatistics and Research Methodology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
| | - Maya Mazuwin Yahya
- Universiti Sains Malaysia Hospital, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
| | - Junaidi A Isa
- Department of Surgery, Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
| | - Erinna M Zon
- Universiti Sains Malaysia Hospital, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ning L, Liu Y, Hou Y, Wang M, Shi M, Liu Z, Zhao J, Liu X. Survival nomogram for patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer based on the SEER database and an external validation cohort. CANCER PATHOGENESIS AND THERAPY 2023; 1:253-261. [PMID: 38327599 PMCID: PMC10846327 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpt.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Background On average, 5-10% of patients are diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) at the initial diagnosis. This study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) in these patients. Methods The nomogram was based on a retrospective study of 9435 patients with de novo MBC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined using the concordance index (C-index), area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to evaluate the benefits and advantages of our new predicting model over the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system. The results were validated in a retrospective study of 103 patients with de novo MBC from January 2013 to June 2022 at an institution in northwest China. Results Multivariate analysis of the primary cohort revealed that independent factors for survival were age at diagnosis, pathological type, histological grade, T stage, N stage, molecular subtype, bone metastasis, brain metastasis, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.688 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.682-0.694) in the training cohort and 0.875 (95% CI, 0.816-0.934) in the validation cohort. The AUC of the nomograms indicated good specificity and sensitivity in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves showed favorable consistency between the predicted and actual survival probabilities. Additionally, the DCA curve produced higher net gains than by the AJCC-TNM staging system. Finally, risk stratification can accurately identify groups of patients with de novo MBC at different risk levels. Conclusions The nomogram showed favorable predictive and discriminative abilities for OS in patients with de novo MBC. Other populations from different countries or prospective studies are needed to further validate the nomogram.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lizhi Ning
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750004, China
| | - Yaobang Liu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750004, China
| | - Yujin Hou
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750004, China
| | - Miaozhou Wang
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Mingqiang Shi
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Zhen Liu
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Jiuda Zhao
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Xinlan Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750004, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Jiang Y, Lekberg T, Nilsson HP. The Late Effects of Cancer Treatment on Female Fertility and the Current Status of Fertility Preservation-A Narrative Review. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1195. [PMID: 37240840 PMCID: PMC10224240 DOI: 10.3390/life13051195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility counseling should be offered to all individuals of young reproductive age early in the patient's trajectory following a cancer diagnosis. Systemic cancer treatment and radiotherapy often have an inherent gonadotoxic effect with the potential to induce permanent infertility and premature ovarian failure. For the best chances to preserve a patient's fertility potential and to improve future quality of life, fertility preservation methods should be applied before cancer treatment initiation, thus multidisciplinary team-work and timely referral to reproductive medicine centers specialized in fertility preservation is recommended. We aim to review the current clinical possibilities for fertility preservation and summarize how infertility, as a late effect of gonadotoxic treatment, affects the growing population of young female cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenny A. Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden; (Y.J.); (T.L.); (H.P.N.)
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yanyu Jiang
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden; (Y.J.); (T.L.); (H.P.N.)
| | - Tobias Lekberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden; (Y.J.); (T.L.); (H.P.N.)
- Breast, Endocrine tumors and Sarcoma Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna P. Nilsson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden; (Y.J.); (T.L.); (H.P.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhu H, Tao L, Hu X, Jiang X. Effects of self-disclosure and resilience on reproductive concern in patients of childbearing age with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068126. [PMID: 36750283 PMCID: PMC9906163 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess reproductive concerns in patients of childbearing age with breast cancer and examine the relationship between self-disclosure, resilience and reproductive concerns. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING Five tertiary first-class general hospitals in Sichuan Province, Southwest China. PARTICIPANTS A total of 319 patients with breast cancer of reproductive age who were hospitalised in the breast oncology department participated in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were the relationship between resilience, self-disclosure and reproductive concerns, and mediating effect analyses. Secondary outcomes included the status of reproductive concerns. RESULTS The model accounted for 39.1% of the variance in reproductive concerns. Self-disclosure had a direct negative effect on reproductive concerns (β= -0.371, p=0.001). Resilience had a direct negative effect on reproductive concerns (β= -0.349, p=0.001) and a direct positive effect on self-disclosure (β=0.507, p=0.001). Furthermore, self-disclosure partially mediated the relation between resilience and reproductive concerns (β= -0.177; SE=0.041; 95% CI -0.261 to -0.104; p<0.050), with a bootstrap of 10 000 samples. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that self-disclosure and resilience may ease reproductive concern. Therefore, self-disclosure education and resilience-oriented interventions should be provided to patients of childbearing age with breast cancer, to reduce reproductive concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhu
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Nursing Department, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lin Tao
- Cancer Day-care Unit, Division of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaoxia Hu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaolian Jiang
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ochi T, Yoshida A, Takahashi O, Kajiura Y, Takei J, Hayashi N, Takei H, Yamauchi H. Prognostic effect of subsequent childbirth after the diagnosis of breast cancer using propensity score matching analysis. Breast Cancer 2023; 30:354-363. [PMID: 36595105 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01429-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among younger patients, one of the important concerns is whether they can give birth safely. Although previous studies have investigated this topic, many aspects remain unclear owing to potential biases. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic effect of subsequent childbirth after the diagnosis using propensity score matching. METHODS A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. This study included patients aged ≤ 45 years, diagnosed with breast cancer between 2005 and 2014. Patients with and without subsequent childbirth were assigned to the childbirth and non-childbirth cohorts, respectively. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the childbirth cohort were compared with those of the non-childbirth cohort. The covariates in the propensity score model included age, tumor size, node status, number of preceding childbirths before the diagnosis, estrogen receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. RESULTS 104 patients with childbirth and 2250 without childbirth were assigned to the respective cohorts. At a median follow-up of 82 months, the childbirth cohort showed a significantly longer RFS than the non-childbirth cohort (HR = 0.469 [0.221-0.992]; p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in the OS (HR = 0.208 [0.029-1.494]; p = 0.119). After matching, subsequent childbirth was not significantly associated with RFS (HR = 0.436 [0.163-1.164], p = 0.098) and OS (HR = 0.372 [0.033-4.134], p = 0.402). CONCLUSIONS Subsequent childbirth was not associated with an increased risk of relapse and mortality. It is important to make younger patients aware of these novel findings and aid them in their decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Ochi
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.,Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Yoshida
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
| | - Osamu Takahashi
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuka Kajiura
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| | - Junko Takei
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| | - Naoki Hayashi
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takei
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideko Yamauchi
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sebbag C, Rousset-Jablonski C, Coussy F, Ray-Coquard I, Garin C, Evrevin C, Cessot M, Labrosse J, Laot L, Darrigues L, Bobrie A, Sénéchal-Davin C, Espié M, Giacchetti S, Plu-Bureau G, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Gompel A, Santulli P, Asselain B, Hotton J, Coutant C, Guerin J, Decanter C, Mailliez A, Brain E, Dumas E, Sablone L, Seintinelles RN, Reyal F, Hamy AS. Contraception in breast cancer survivors from the FEERIC case-control study (performed on behalf of the Seintinelles research network). Breast 2022; 67:62-70. [PMID: 36630821 PMCID: PMC9982267 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the prevalence of contraception in breast cancer (BC) patients at risk of unintentional pregnancy (i.e. not currently pregnant or trying to get pregnant) and matched controls. STUDY DESIGN The FEERIC study (Fertility, Pregnancy, Contraception after BC in France) is a prospective, multicenter case-control study, including localized BC patients aged 18-43 years, matched for age and parity to cancer-free volunteer controls in a 1:2 ratio. Data were collected through online questionnaires completed on the Seintinelles research platform. RESULTS In a population of 1278 women at risk of unintentional pregnancy, the prevalence of contraception at study inclusion did not differ significantly between cases (340/431, 78.9%) and controls (666/847, 78.6%, p = 0.97). Contrarily, the contraceptive methods used were significantly different, with a higher proportion of copper IUD use in BC survivors (59.5% versus 25.0% in controls p < 0.001). For patients at risk of unintentional pregnancy, receiving information about chemotherapy-induced ovary damage at BC diagnosis (OR = 2.47 95%CI [ 1.39-4.37] and anti-HER2 treatment (OR = 2.46, 95% CI [ 1.14-6.16]) were significantly associated with the use of a contraception in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION In this large French study, BC survivors had a prevalence of contraception use similar to that for matched controls, though almost one in five women at risk of unintentional pregnancy did not use contraception. Dedicated consultations at cancer care centers could further improve access to information and contraception counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Sebbag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France,Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, Paris, France,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- INSERM U1290 RESearch on HealthcAre PErformance (RESHAPE), University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France,Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Florence Coussy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- INSERM U1290 RESearch on HealthcAre PErformance (RESHAPE), University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France,Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Clémentine Garin
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Clémence Evrevin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Marion Cessot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Julie Labrosse
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Lucie Laot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Lauren Darrigues
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Angélique Bobrie
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Marc Espié
- Sénolopole, Hôpital Saint Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France; University Paris, Paris France
| | - Sylvie Giacchetti
- Sénolopole, Hôpital Saint Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France; University Paris, Paris France
| | - Geneviève Plu-Bureau
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; University Paris, Paris France
| | | | - Anne Gompel
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; University Paris, Paris France
| | - Pietro Santulli
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; University Paris, Paris France
| | | | - Judicaël Hotton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Godinot, Reims, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc - Unicancer, Dijon, France,Clinical Research Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc - Unicancer, Dijon, France
| | - Julien Guerin
- Data Factory, Data Office, Institut Curie, 25 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | | | - Audrey Mailliez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambert, Lille, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Elise Dumas
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Laura Sablone
- Seintinelles Research Network, 40 Rue Rémy Dumoncel, 75014, Paris, France
| | | | - Fabien Reyal
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, Paris, France,Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France,Seintinelles Research Network, 40 Rue Rémy Dumoncel, 75014, Paris, France,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, Paris, France; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Seintinelles Research Network, 40 Rue Rémy Dumoncel, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Should Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) Systematically Be Proposed to BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235769. [PMID: 36497251 PMCID: PMC9739906 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past years, BRCA genes pathogenic variants have been associated to reproductive issues. Indeed, evidence indicate that BRCA-mutated patients are not only at higher risk of developing malignancies, but may also present a reduction of the follicular stockpile. Given these characteristics, BRCA patients may be candidates to fertility preservation (FP) techniques or preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to avoid the transmission of this inherited situation. Since the success rates of both procedures are highly related to the number of oocytes that could be recovered after ovarian stimulation, predicted by ovarian reserve tests, they are ideally performed before the diagnosis of cancer and its treatment. Despite the specific reproductive challenges related to BRCA status, no international guidelines for the application of PGT and FP in this subgroup of patients is currently available. The present article aims to review the available data regarding BRCA carriers' ovarian reserve and PGT success rates in oncologic and non-oncologic contexts, to determine the actual indication of PGT and further to improve patients' care pathway.
Collapse
|
10
|
Nolan K, Boland MR, Hill AD. Pregnancy After Breast Cancer - Prognostic Safety and Pregnancy Outcomes According to Oestrogen Receptor Status: A Systematic Review. J Breast Cancer 2022; 25:443-453. [PMID: 36479601 PMCID: PMC9807324 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer is the primary cause of cancer-related death in women. Women diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer have prolonged treatment durations. Owing to the paucity of research and lack of consensus regarding conception planning and pregnancy for patients with ER-positive breast cancer, we aimed to assess pregnancy and survival outcomes in women with ER-positive breast cancer during and after treatment. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the available studies on pregnancy after ER-positive breast cancer. The assessed outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), hormonal therapy duration, and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS Ultimately, 2,669 patients from five studies were included in this study. When all breast cancer receptor subtypes were included in the analysis, pregnancy after breast cancer was associated with a time-dependent protective effect on both DFS and OS. This protective effect was not evident when examining ER-positive patients with subsequent pregnancies, and no significant differences in DFS were observed. ER-positive patients who became pregnant received significantly lower rates of hormonal therapy. Hormonal treatment at the time of pregnancy was correlated with increased rates of termination owing to concerns about teratogenic effects. CONCLUSIONS Pregnancy after breast cancer did not significantly affect DFS in ER-positive patients over a follow-up period of 5-10 years from diagnosis, although did significantly affect hormonal treatment duration in the reviewed studies. Further analysis and in-depth studies are required to assess the effects of altered hormonal treatment times, as well as patient management related to pregnancy planning after breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Nolan
- Department of General/Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital and The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael R. Boland
- Department of General/Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital and The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arnold D.K. Hill
- Department of General/Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital and The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rauh-Hain JA, Zubizarreta J, Nitecki R, Melamed A, Fu S, Jorgensen K, Brady PC, Baker VL, Chavez-MacGregor M, Giordano SH, Keating NL. Survival outcomes following pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: A population-based study. Cancer 2022; 128:3243-3253. [PMID: 35767282 PMCID: PMC9378486 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to determine the impact of pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies (ART) on breast-cancer-specific survival among breast cancer survivors. METHODS The authors performed a cohort study using a novel data linkage from the California Cancer Registry, the California birth cohort, and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System data sets. They performed risk-set matching in women with stages I-III breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2012. For each pregnant woman, comparable women who were not pregnant at that point but were otherwise similar based on observed characteristics were matched at the time of pregnancy. After matching, Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of pregnancy with breast-cancer-specific survival. We repeated these analyses for women who received ART. RESULTS Among 30,021 women with breast cancer, 553 had a pregnancy and 189 attempted at least one cycle of ART. In Cox proportional hazards modeling, the pregnancy group had a higher 5-year disease-specific survival rate; 95.6% in the pregnancy group and 90.6% in the nonpregnant group (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77). In women with hormone receptor-positive cancer, we found similar results (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.2-0.91). In the ART analysis, there was no difference in survival between groups; the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 96.9% in the ART group and 94.1% in the non-ART group (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.17-1.13). CONCLUSION Pregnancy and ART are not associated with worse survival in women with breast cancer. LAY SUMMARY We sought to determine the impact of pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies (ART) among breast cancer survivors. We performed a study of 30,021 women by linking available data from California and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System. For each pregnant woman, we matched at the time of pregnancy comparable women who were not pregnant at that point but were otherwise similar based on observed characteristics. We repeated these analyses for women who received ART. We found that pregnancy and ART were not associated with worse survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jose Zubizarreta
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Roni Nitecki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | - Shuangshuang Fu
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kirsten Jorgensen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Paula C. Brady
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Valerie L. Baker
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nancy L. Keating
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Duraes M, Rathat G, Bringer-Deutsch S, Ranisavljevic N, Brouillet S, Defez-Fougeron C, Duflos C. Fertility preservation in patients of childbearing age treated for breast cancer: A nationwide cohort study. Breast 2022; 64:121-126. [PMID: 35661841 PMCID: PMC9163100 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 7% of breast cancers are diagnosed in women under 40. Question of subsequent fertility has become fundamental. We aimed to evaluate the rate of fertility preservation (FP) by oocyte retrieval (OR) after ovarian stimulation in patients of childbearing age, managed for breast cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy in France, reuse rate of frozen gametes and live births rate (LBR) after treatment. Methods We included 15,774 women between 18 and 40 years old, managed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, between January 2011 and December 2020 from a French health registry. Patients with OR after breast surgery and before chemotherapy were considered as FP group; those with no OR as no FP group. To compare LBR with French population independently of age, we calculated Standardized Incidence Rates (SIR) of live births using indirect standardization method. Results FP rate increased gradually since 2011, reaching 17% in 2019. A decrease in use was observed in 2020 (13,9%). Among patients with at least 2 years of follow-up, gamete reuse rate was 5,6%. Births after cancer were mostly from spontaneous pregnancies. Among patients with at least 3 years of follow-up, LBR was 19,6% in FP group, 3,9% in second group. SIR of live births was of 1,05 (95% CI = 0.91–1.19) and 0.33 (95% CI = 0.30–0.36) in FP and no FP group respectively. Conclusion Oncofertility activity increased until 2019 in France, reaching 17%. Gamete reuse rate was low. Births resulted mainly from spontaneous pregnancies. SIR of live births was lower in no FP group. Fertility preservation rate increased gradually since 2011, reaching 17% in 2019. Among patients with at least 2 years of follow-up, gamete reuse rate was 5,6%. Births after breast cancer were mostly from spontaneous pregnancies. Life births rate was 19,6% in fertility preservation group, 3,9% in second group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Duraes
- Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
| | - Gauthier Rathat
- Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Bringer-Deutsch
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Noémie Ranisavljevic
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Brouillet
- Department of Reproductive Biology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Claire Duflos
- Clinical Research and Epidemiology Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kufel-Grabowska J, Podolak A, Maliszewski D, Bartoszkiewicz M, Ramlau R, Lukaszuk K. Fertility Counseling in BRCA1/2-Mutated Women with Breast Cancer and Healthy Individuals. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11143996. [PMID: 35887761 PMCID: PMC9321124 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11143996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and the fifth leading cause of cancer death. In 2020, there were 2.3 million new cases, and 685,000 women died from it. Breast cancer among young women under 40 years of age accounts for 5% to 10% of all cases of this cancer. The greater availability of multi-gene sequence analysis by next-generation sequencing has improved diagnosis and, consequently, the possibility of using appropriate therapeutic approaches in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers. Treatment of young breast cancer patients affects their reproductive potential by reducing ovarian reserve. It can lead to reversible or permanent premature menopause, decreased libido, and other symptoms of sex hormone deficiency. This requires that, in addition to oncological treatment, patients are offered genetic counseling, oncofertility, psychological assistance, and sexological counseling. Given the number of BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers among young breast cancer patients, but also thanks to growing public awareness, among their healthy family members planning offspring, the possibility of benefiting from preimplantation testing and performing cancer-risk-reduction procedures: RRM (risk-reducing mastectomy) and RRSO (risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy) significantly increase the chance of a genetically burdened person living a healthy life and giving birth to a child not burdened by the parent's germline mutation. The goal of this paper is to show methods and examples of fertility counselling for BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers, including both patients already affected by cancer and healthy individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Kufel-Grabowska
- Department of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland; (J.K.-G.); (R.R.)
| | - Amira Podolak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland; (A.P.); (K.L.)
| | - Daniel Maliszewski
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Janusza Korczaka w Słupsku Sp. z o.o., 76-200 Słupsk, Poland;
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery at Specialist Hospital in Koscierzyn, Sp.z.o.o., 83-400 Kościerzyna, Poland
- Swissmed Health Center, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Mikołaj Bartoszkiewicz
- Department of Immunobiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-61-854-76-53
| | - Rodryg Ramlau
- Department of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland; (J.K.-G.); (R.R.)
| | - Krzysztof Lukaszuk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland; (A.P.); (K.L.)
- Invicta Research and Development Center, 81-740 Sopot, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bae SY, Lee J, Lee JS, Yoon JS, Kim KS, Kim YS, Kim Z, Min JW, Shim EJ, Lee I, Lee MH, Park S. Prognosis of pregnancy after breast cancer diagnosis according to the type of treatment: A population-based study in Korea by the SMARTSHIP group. Breast 2022; 63:46-53. [PMID: 35299034 PMCID: PMC8927839 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds In this study, we evaluated the incidence and outcomes of pregnancy after breast cancer was diagnosed in women of childbearing age. Additionally, we evaluated the prognosis of patients who became pregnant after breast cancer, according to the treatment. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of women aged 20–45 years who were surgically treated for breast cancer between 2004 and 2014 using the Korean National Health Insurance database. The patients were classified into six groups according to the treatment. Propensity score matching was applied to the cohort to analyze the risk of breast cancer-associated mortality after pregnancy and childbirth. Results Of the 45,765 patients who had been newly diagnosed with breast cancer, 1826 (4%) became pregnant after breast cancer diagnosis. Among the pregnant group, the HR of the risk of death was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.36) for patients who became pregnant ≥49 months after the diagnosis. In patients who received endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, the pregnant group had better prognosis than the non-pregnant group. There was no significant difference between the pregnant group and the non-pregnant group in patients who received chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without endocrine therapy. Conclusion The risk of death was low in women who became pregnant ≥49 months after the diagnosis of breast cancer. The prognosis of pregnant women was non-inferior to that of non-pregnant women, even in women who received trastuzumab. These findings provide reassurance to patients with HER2-positive cancer who are considering future pregnancy. The risk of death was low in women who became pregnant ≥49 months after the diagnosis of breast cancer. In patients who received endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, the pregnant group had better prognosis than the non-pregnant group. The prognosis of pregnant women was non-inferior to that of non-pregnant women, even in women who received trastuzumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Youn Bae
- Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Republic of Korea
| | - Jihyoun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Sung Lee
- Clinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Sun Yoon
- Korea University, Department of Biostatistics, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ku Sang Kim
- Department of Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo Seok Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Zisun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Won Min
- Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Jung Shim
- Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Ilkyun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Hyuk Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungmin Park
- Department of Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Di Tucci C, Galati G, Mattei G, Chinè A, Fracassi A, Muzii L. Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102500. [PMID: 35626104 PMCID: PMC9139810 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Approximately one million new cases of cancer are diagnosed in women of reproductive age every year. In the last few decades, advances in early diagnosis and treatment have improved the survival rate. However, the adverse effects of anticancer therapy on the ovaries and uterus have a significant impact on future fertility and may affect the quality of life of cancer survivors. Unfortunately, evidence about the trend of ovarian reserve loss over time is insufficient for predicting the duration of the fertile period. Currently, impaired fertility in cancer survivors is a growing issue that is complicated by an increasing number of women delaying childbearing. This review focuses on the detrimental effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery on reproductive functions and describes the mechanisms causing reduced fertility in cancer survivors. Moreover, in this review, the available fertility preservation strategies to guarantee the chance of motherhood in cancer survivors are illustrated. Abstract The incidence of cancer in reproductive-aged women is 7%, but, despite the increased number of cancer cases, advances in early diagnosis and treatment have raised the survival rate. Furthermore, in the last four decades, there has been a rising trend of delaying childbearing. There has been an increasing number of couples referred to Reproductive Medicine Centers for infertility problems after one partner has been treated for cancer. In these cases, the main cause of reduced fertility derives from treatments. In this review, we describe the effects and the risks of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in women with cancer, and we will focus on available fertility preservation techniques and their efficacy in terms of success in pregnancy and live birth rates.
Collapse
|
16
|
Mazo Canola M, Kaklamani VG. Anti-estrogen Therapy and Fertility Preservation in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: a Review. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00444-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
17
|
Kaidar-Person O, Yoeli-Ullman R, Pillar N, Paluch-Shimon S, Poortmans P, Lawrence YR. Obstetric complications at time of delivery amongst breast cancer survivors: A population-based cohort study. Breast 2022; 62:170-178. [PMID: 35219114 PMCID: PMC8873951 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim was to determine whether breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of obstetric and maternal complications at time of delivery. METHODS The USA 'National Inpatient Sample' database was queried for hospitalizations associated with deliveries, between 2015 and 2018. The incidence of maternal and fetal complications was compared between women with, and without, a personal history of breast cancer. RESULTS Of the 2,103,216 birth related admissions, 617 (0.03%) of the women were breast cancer survivors, with the proportion increasing over time (from 0.02% in 2015 to 0.04% in 2018). Breast cancer survivors had a higher socioeconomic status (p < 0.001) and were significantly older compared to other mothers (34 vs. 28 years, p < 0.001). Additionally, they were more likely to suffer from preexisting chronic diseases including cardiopulmonary disease and diabetes mellitus, and had a higher incidence of multiple gestation (4.4% vs. 1.6%) [OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.9-4.0, p < 0.001]. The incidence of acute adverse events at time of delivery including fetal distress, preterm labor, cesarean section and maternal infection was higher amongst the breast cancer survivors. On multivariate analysis age, ethnic group, comorbidities, multiple gestations, and a previous breast cancer diagnosis, but not cancer treatment, were associated with an increased risk of an obstetric adverse event. CONCLUSION Breast cancer survivors have more comorbidities and are at increased risk of acute obstetrical complications at time of delivery. Further studies are required to validate these findings, and evaluate the ability of interventions to improve obstetrical outcomes amongst breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, 5265601, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| | - Rakefet Yoeli-Ullman
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Nir Pillar
- Department of Pathology, Hadassah-Hebrew-University-Medical-Center, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Yaacov R Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, 5265601, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Department Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ozcan MCH, Snegovskikh V, Adamson GD. Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review. WOMEN'S HEALTH (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 18:17455065221074886. [PMID: 35130799 PMCID: PMC8829712 DOI: 10.1177/17455065221074886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Review the safety of fertility preservation through ovarian stimulation with oocyte or embryo cryopreservation, including cycle and medication options. EVIDENCE REVIEW A systematic review of peer-reviewed sources revealed 2 applicable randomized control trials and 60 cohort studies as well as 20 additional expert opinions or reviews. RESULTS The capacity for future family building is important for the majority of reproductive age people, despite life-altering medical or oncologic diagnosis. Modern fertility preservation generates a high rate of oocyte yield while utilizing protocols that can be started at multiple points in the menstrual cycle and suppressing supra-physiologic levels of estrogen. Finally, more than one quarter of fertility preservation patients will return to later utilize fertility services. CONCLUSION For most patients, fertility preservation can safely be pursued and completed within 2 weeks without affecting disease severity or long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan CH Ozcan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
- Meghan CH Ozcan, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, 90 Plain St., Providence, RI 02903, USA.
| | - Victoria Snegovskikh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kang M, Chun YS, Park HK, Cho EK, Jung J, Kim Y. Subsequent pregnancy and long-term safety after breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of Korean health insurance data. Ann Surg Treat Res 2022; 102:73-82. [PMID: 35198510 PMCID: PMC8831090 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2022.102.2.73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Long-term safety of pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) remains controversial, especially with respect to BC biological subtypes. Methods We analyzed a population-based retrospective cohort with BC from 2002 to 2017. Patient-level 1:1 matching was performed between pregnant and nonpregnant women. The study population was categorized into 6 biological subtypes based on the combination of prescribed therapies. Subanalyses were performed considering the time to pregnancy after BC diagnosis, systemic therapy, and pregnancy outcomes. Results We identified 544 matched women with BC, who were assigned to the pregnant (cases, n = 272) or nonpregnant group (controls, n = 272) of similar characteristics, adjusted for guaranteed bias. These patients were followed up for 10 years, or disease and mortality occurrence after the diagnosis of BC. Survival estimates were calculated. The actuarial 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 97.4% and 91.9% for pregnant and nonpregnant patients, respectively. The pregnant group showed significantly better OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12–0.68; P = 0.005) and did not have a significantly inferior disease-free survival (aHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.61–1.99; P = 0.760). Conclusion Consistent outcomes were observed in every subgroup analysis. Our observational data provides reassuring evidence on the long-term safety of pregnancy in young patients with BC regardless of the BC biological subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minsun Kang
- Artificial Intelligence and Big-Data Convergence Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Yong Soon Chun
- Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Heung Kyu Park
- Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Cho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jaehun Jung
- Artificial Intelligence and Big-Data Convergence Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Yunyeong Kim
- Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Moragón S, Di Liello R, Bermejo B, Hernando C, Olcina E, Chirivella I, Lluch A, Cejalvo JM, Martínez MT. Fertility and breast cancer: A literature review of counseling, preservation options and outcomes. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 166:103461. [PMID: 34461268 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation is an important issue in breast cancer patients undergoing oncological treatment. Fertility counseling is a crucial need given the physical and psychological stress experienced by patients. Cryopreservation of mature oocytes is currently the standard fertility-preserving procedure. Other options such as ovarian tissue preservation or gonadal protection during chemotherapy are still experimental, but have proven effectiveness. Prompt referral to a fertility unit is highly recommended in order to ensure quality of care. In this article, we focus on the different strategies to preserve fertility in breast cancer patients, assessing also the safety of pregnancy and breastfeeding after cancer. A systemic literature review was performed for research articles published in English in PubMed, or as abstracts from the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meetings, using the search terms "breast cancer" and "fertility".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Moragón
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raimondo Di Liello
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania ''Luigi Vanvitelli'', Naples, Italy
| | - Begoña Bermejo
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), Spain
| | - Cristina Hernando
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ernesto Olcina
- Hematology and Oncology Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Isabel Chirivella
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Lluch
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), Spain
| | - Juan Miguel Cejalvo
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), Spain.
| | - María Teresa Martínez
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jones R. How are women supported in making decisions regarding fertility preservation after a breast cancer diagnosis? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 29:s12-s21. [PMID: 32972225 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.17.s12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Although there has been an increase in fertility preservation treatment options in recent years, existing evidence would suggest that many young women who have breast cancer do not feel well supported in making decisions in this area. A breast cancer diagnosis and the possibility of becoming infertile are known to cause psychological issues for young women and many find it difficult to make decisions at this time, causing them a great deal of stress and anxiety. Given the need for patient-centred care, this literature review looked at the decision-making support given to women with a diagnosis of breast cancer as part of fertility preservation treatment. The review found that women lacked support and struggled to make decisions at this critical point in their lives. The findings of the review suggest that women would benefit from a wide range of decision support interventions prior to and following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Jones
- Was a Student Nurse, University of East Anglia, when this article was written. She is now a Staff Nurse at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Corey B, Smania MA, Spotts H, Andersen M. Young Women With Breast Cancer: Treatment, Care, and Nursing Implications. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2021; 24:139-147. [PMID: 32196004 DOI: 10.1188/20.cjon.139-147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young women with breast cancer (YWBC) are more likely to have aggressive disease, carry mutations for hereditary cancer genes, and experience higher mortality. They also may face reduced fertility because of the toxicity of chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES This article aims to present a review of YWBC treatments, sequelae of treatment, and psychosocial challenges. METHODS The authors performed a review of guideline-supported treatment options, patient resources, and nursing implications. FINDINGS Because of high-risk cancers and a lack of specific treatment guidelines, healthcare providers may consider aggressive treatments for younger patients. However, studies indicate that the foundation for treatment decisions for YWBC are best based on disease stage and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
Collapse
|
23
|
Fertility Preservation and Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-021-00420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
24
|
Lei YY, Yeo W. The risk of menopausal symptoms in premenopausal breast cancer patients and current pharmacological prevention strategies. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:1163-1175. [PMID: 33951990 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1926980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: For young premenopausal breast cancer (BC) patients, adjuvant chemotherapy and other anti-cancer treatments can increase the risk of menopausal symptoms and may cause chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA), infertility and premature ovarian insufficiency (POI).Areas covered: In this report, menopausal symptoms related to anti-cancer treatment are described. Menstrual disturbances associated with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in premenopausal women withBC are discussed. To prevent menopausal symptoms, CRA and POI, data on the efficacy of temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) during chemotherapy are highlighted. Pooled analyses have confirmed that concurrent administration of GnRHa during chemotherapy could significantly reduce the risk of developing chemotherapy-induced POI in premenopausal women with early-stageBC. In addition, reports have suggested that embryo/oocyte cryopreservation may increase the chance of pregnancy after the diagnosis ofBC, although such data remain limited.Expert opinion: Commonly experienced by pre-menopausal women withBC, anti-cancer treatment could cause severe menopausal symptoms. Temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy provided asafe and efficient strategy to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced POI in premenopausal patients with early-stageBC undergoing (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Yuan Lei
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Winnie Yeo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Hong Kong Cancer Institute, State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Success and risks of pregnancy after breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 188:593-600. [PMID: 33884537 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06232-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. The number of childbearing-age women diagnosed with early breast cancer (eBC) is increasing, raising questions over their subsequent fertility. PURPOSE The main objective of this study was therefore to assess, in a cohort of eBC patients with pregnancy desire, the rate of live births achieved spontaneously or by assisted reproductive technology. METHODS We conducted an observational, descriptive, retrospective study including patients aged 18-40, treated for eBC at the Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO) Pays de Loire between July 2010 and July 2016, with pregnancy desire. The primary outcome was the rate of live births. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, time to conception, and spontaneous or assisted pregnancy rate. RESULTS 61 patients were included, with a live birth rate of 19.7% (12/61). We observed no recurrence or death in women with a pregnancy. Pregnancy started with a median time of 36.4 months after the end of treatment (4.1-51.3 months). All pregnancies in this cohort were achieved spontaneously. CONCLUSION The results of our cohort are consistent with previous results showing that spontaneous pregnancy remains possible after treatment for eBC without increasing the risk of recurrence or death.
Collapse
|
26
|
Guérin S, Joste M, Khene ZE, Rousseau C, Brousse S, Nyangoh Timoh K, Levêque J, Lavoué V. [External validation of nomogram for the prediction of recurrences of pregnancy-associated breast cancer]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 49:844-849. [PMID: 33892161 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diagnosis and therapeutics are challenging in pregnancy-related breast cancer and a multidisciplinary approach is therefore essential. A nomogram predictive of recurrence at 36 months of PABC has recently been developed, the aim was to evaluate it on an independent cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a monocentric retrospective study including all patients with PABC between January 2004 and March 2018. A Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis of recurrence-free survival. Nomogram performance was analysed on 3 indicators: discrimination by a receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC), calibration and net clinical benefit by a decision curve analysis. RESULTS Forty-one patients have been included. The survival rate was 83 % at 3 years. The nomogram showed acceptable discrimination capacities on receiver-operator characteristic analysis (c-index: 0.78). Decision-curve analysis showed a positive net-benefit for relapse probability ranges between 5 % and 35 %. CONCLUSION The performance of this prediction model is acceptable but the net clinical benefit low. In conclusion, prediction of recurrence remains challenging with a continued need for more precise tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guérin
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France.
| | - M Joste
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - Z E Khene
- Centre d'investigation clinique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - C Rousseau
- Centre d'investigation clinique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - S Brousse
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - K Nyangoh Timoh
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - J Levêque
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - V Lavoué
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bártolo A, Santos IM, Guimarães R, Reis S, Monteiro S. Reproduction-related cognitive processing and distress among young adult women: the role of personal breast cancer history. Cogn Process 2021; 22:569-578. [PMID: 33797684 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-021-01026-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer diagnosis can threaten fertility and biological motherhood in women of reproductive age due to the gonadotoxic effects of treatments. Much evidence documents these women fertility-related concerns and distress, but no study has attempted to understand how implicit cognitive processes can contribute to this maladjustment. In this research, we explored whether reproduction-related stimuli interfere with cognition among cancer survivors with infertility risk using an emotional Stroop task. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between reproduction-related cognitive processing and psychological morbidity. Young cancer survivors aged 18-40 years who received anticancer treatments and an age-matched non-cancer control group without known fertility problems were compared. Color-naming times and error rates were assessed. Participants in both groups were slower naming the color of reproduction-related words in comparison to unrelated negative valence words. Although in the same direction, this difference did not reach statistical significance for positive and neutral unrelated word lists. Further analysis suggested that biased attention toward reproduction-related information was associated with higher depression levels in young women with personal breast cancer history, but not in healthy women. These findings suggest that biased processing of reproduction-related cues might be a vulnerability factor after a breast cancer diagnosis. Additionally, this study puts in evidence the potential usefulness of using experimental tasks to investigate attentional bias in a context where fertility is at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Bártolo
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
| | - Isabel M Santos
- William James Center for Research, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Raquel Guimarães
- Breast Center, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Salomé Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sara Monteiro
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yu KD, Ge JY, Liu XY, Mo M, He M, Shao ZM. Cyclophosphamide-free Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Protection in Young Women with Breast Cancer: a Randomized Phase 3 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1352-1359. [PMID: 33822134 PMCID: PMC8486325 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy-induced premature menopause leads to some consequences, including infertility. We initiated this randomized phase 3 trial to determine whether a cyclophosphamide-free adjuvant chemotherapy regimen would increase the likelihood of menses resumption and improve survival outcomes. METHODS Young women with operable ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer after definitive surgery were randomized to receive adjuvant epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel (EC-wP) or epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by weekly paclitaxel (EP-wP). All patients received at least 5-year adjuvant endocrine therapy after chemotherapy. Two coprimary endpoints were the rate of menstrual resumption at 12 months after chemotherapy and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01026116). All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Between Jan 2011 and Dec 2016, 521 patients (median age = 34 years; interquartile range = 31-38 years) were enrolled, with 261 in the EC-wP group and 260 in the EP-wP group. The rate of menstrual resumption at 12 months after chemotherapy was 48.3% in EC-wP (95% confidence interval [CI] = 42.2% to 54.3%) and 63.1% in EP-wP (95% CI = 57.2% to 68.9%), with an absolute difference of 14.8% (95% CI = 6.37% to 23.2%, P < 0.001). The post-hoc exploratory analysis by patient-reported outcome questionnaires indicated that pregnancy might occur in fewer women in the EC-wP group than in the EP-wP group. At a median follow-up of 62 months, the 5-year DFS was 78.3% (95% CI = 72.2% to 83.3%) in EC-wP and 84.7% (95% CI = 79.3% to 88.8%) in EP-wP (stratified log-rank P = 0.07). The safety data were consistent with the known safety profiles of relevant drugs. CONCLUSIONS The cyclophosphamide-free chemotherapy regimen might be associated with a higher probability of menses resumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-Da Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Correspondence to: Zhi-Ming Shao, MD, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Rd, Shanghai 200032, China (e-mail: ) and Ke-Da Yu, MD, PhD, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Rd, Shanghai 200032, China (e-mail: )
| | - Jing-Yu Ge
- Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi-Yu Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Miao Mo
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Min He
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Ming Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Conception after chemotherapy: post-chemotherapy method of conception and pregnancy outcomes in breast cancer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:1755-1765. [PMID: 33740176 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02133-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As the paradigm shifts towards improving cancer survivorship, an important concern for reproductive-aged women diagnosed with cancer is how their disease and its treatment will affect their future fertility. We sought to characterize pregnancy attempts and outcomes in breast cancer patients following chemotherapy. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer seen between 2010 and 2019. A questionnaire was administered following cancer treatment with questions regarding oncologic and reproductive history and attempts and method of conception. RESULTS Of 181 participants, 46 (25.4%) attempted to conceive following chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients (76.1%) had return of ovarian function. Of those, 34 patients (mean age 32.8 years) first attempted to conceive by intercourse, and 22 (64.7%) became pregnant, resulting in 17 live births. Of the remaining 12 who did not successfully conceive through intercourse, eight went on to try other methods, resulting in five additional pregnancies and one live birth. Twelve patients (mean age 34.6 years) proceeded directly to ART; of those, eight (66.7%) became pregnant, resulting in six live births. CONCLUSION In breast cancer patients with return of ovarian function after chemotherapy, half were able to conceive by intercourse alone. In order to maximize reproductive potential in patients who have return of ovarian function, providers should offer natural conception as a reasonable option prior to the use of cryopreserved tissue. For those who did not attempt to conceive on their own, the use of pre-treatment cryopreserved eggs or embryos had a high likelihood of success.
Collapse
|
30
|
Time to Pregnancy, Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes after Breast Cancer: A Study from the Maternity Network for Young Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051070. [PMID: 33802333 PMCID: PMC7959151 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Although an increasing number of young breast cancer (BC) patients have a pregnancy desire after BC, the time necessary to obtain a pregnancy after treatment and subsequent outcomes remain unknown. We aimed to determine the time to evolutive pregnancy in a cohort of BC survivors and subsequent obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. We analyzed BC patients treated at Institut Curie from 2005-2017, aged 18-43 years old (y.o.) at diagnosis having at least one subsequent pregnancy. 133 patients were included, representing 197 pregnancies. Mean age at BC diagnosis was 32.8 y.o. and at pregnancy beginning was 36.8 y.o. 71% pregnancies were planned, 18% unplanned and 86% spontaneous. 64% pregnancies resulted in live birth (n = 131). Median time from BC diagnosis to pregnancy beginning was 48 months and was significantly associated with endocrine therapy (p < 0.001). Median time to pregnancy was 4.3 months. Median time to evolutive pregnancy 5.6 months. In multivariate analysis, menstrual cycles before pregnancy remained significantly associated with time to pregnancy and endocrine therapy with time evolutive to pregnancy. None of the BC treatments (chemotherapy/endocrine therapy/trastuzumab) was significantly associated with obstetrical nor neonatal outcomes, that seemed comparable to global population. Our findings provide reassuring data for pregnancy counseling both in terms of delay and outcome.
Collapse
|
31
|
Lefrère H, Lenaerts L, Borges VF, Schedin P, Neven P, Amant F. Postpartum breast cancer: mechanisms underlying its worse prognosis, treatment implications, and fertility preservation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:412-422. [PMID: 33649008 PMCID: PMC7925817 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancers that occur in young women up to 5 to 10 years' postpartum are associated with an increased risk for metastasis and death compared with breast cancers diagnosed in young, premenopausal women during or outside pregnancy. Given the trend to delay childbearing, this frequency is expected to increase. The (immuno)biology of postpartum breast cancer is poorly understood and, hence, it is unknown why postpartum breast cancer has an enhanced risk for metastasis or how it should be effectively targeted for improved survival. The poorer prognosis of women diagnosed within 10 years of a completed pregnancy is most often contributed to the effects of mammary gland involution. We will discuss the most recent data and mechanistic insights of the most important processes associated with involution and their role in the adverse effects of a postpartum diagnosis. We will also look into the effect of lactation on breast cancer outcome after diagnosis. In addition, we will discuss the available treatment strategies that are currently being used to treat postpartum breast cancer, keeping in mind the importance of fertility preservation in this group of young women. These additional insights might offer potential therapeutic options for the improved treatment of women with this specific condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne Lefrère
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven Gasthuisberg Campus, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology, AVL NKI, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Lenaerts
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven Gasthuisberg Campus, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Virginia F Borges
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Young Women's Breast Cancer Translational Program, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Pepper Schedin
- Young Women's Breast Cancer Translational Program, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Patrick Neven
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven Gasthuisberg Campus, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven UZ Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.,Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven UZ Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven Gasthuisberg Campus, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium .,Department of Gynecology, AVL NKI, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven UZ Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.,Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Li Y, Zhang Y, Wang S, Lu S, Song Y, Liu H. The Effect of Subsequent Pregnancy on Prognosis in Young Breast Cancer Patients (≤35 Years Old) According to Hormone Receptor Status. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:1505-1515. [PMID: 33623430 PMCID: PMC7894832 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s290566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to examine the effect of pregnancy on prognosis in young breast cancer (YBC) patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive after surgery and the safety of interrupting endocrine therapy (ET). Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients who became pregnant after BC surgery under the age of 35 and were matched (1:4) to nonpregnant patients from 2006 to 2014. The primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in HR-positive BC patients, and the secondary endpoints were DFS and OS in HR-negative BC patients and the whole population. Subgroup analyses included the DFS of patients who became pregnant within 5 years after surgery and DFS according to the ET interval time (≤ 30 months v > 30 months) in the pregnant group. Results A total of 1323 YBC patients were collected in our study, which included 68 pregnant patients and 264 matched nonpregnant patients. There were no statistically significant differences in DFS and OS among HR-positive patients (P=0.657, P=0.250, respectively) and the whole population (P=0.058, P=0.152, respectively). A BC pregnancy interval ≤ 5 years showed a better DFS (P=0.042), and an ET interval ≤ 30 months had a worse DFS (P = 0.01). Conclusion This study did not observe a worse prognosis in patients with HR-positive disease who became pregnant after BC surgery, and an ET interval less than 30 months in pregnant patients led to a worse outcome. Patients were able to become pregnant within 5 years after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Li
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuhan Zhang
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuaibing Wang
- Oncology Department, China National Petroleum Corporation Central Hospital, Langfang, Hebei Province, 065000, People's Republic of China
| | - Su Lu
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yixuan Song
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Liu
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Buonomoa B, Peccatorib FA. Fertility preservation in endocrine responsive breast cancer: data and prejudices. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 14:1157. [PMID: 33574902 PMCID: PMC7864682 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Even if current guidelines suggest an early referral of young breast cancer (BC) patients to fertility preservation counselling, physicians still lack knowledge about the different available strategies. Hormonal stimulation to harvest mature oocytes is considered unsafe by many oncologists and experts in reproductive medicine, particularly in the setting of oestrogen receptor-positive BC. The aim of this mini-review is to provide an overview on the available data about this topic in order to clarify potential misunderstandings and to highlight the new trends in the oncofertility field with their pros and limitations.
Collapse
|
34
|
Expert consensus on diagnosis, treatment and fertility management of young breast cancer patients. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
|
35
|
La Marca A, Mastellari E. Fertility preservation for genetic diseases leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:759-777. [PMID: 33495935 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02067-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The current review aims to summarize the data available concerning the applicability of fertility preservation techniques to genetic conditions at risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). METHODS A literature review through the PubMed Database was carried out. RESULTS About 10% of cases of POI is related to genetic diseases. The most frequent conditions associated with POI are Turner syndrome and fragile X pre-mutation; mutation of BRCA 1-2 genes and several other mutations and genetic syndromes have recently been highlighted, although they rarely occur. If a diagnosis is issued before POI onset, counseling on currently available fertility preservation techniques is advisable. In case of spontaneous menarche (this can occur variably depending on the mutation) established techniques like embryo or oocyte cryopreservation can be proposed, even if, in some cases, their effectiveness may be reduced by ovarian alterations connected to the mutation. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has recently been defined as an established medical procedure for fertility preservation in young cancer patients and may be an option for prepubertal patients. However, it is still experimental in special populations with genetic diseases causing POI. New innovative experimental techniques, like in vitro maturation of immature oocytes (IVM) and vitro activation (IVA) of immature follicles on ovarian tissue, have shown limited but encouraging data and they will be probably available in the near future. For a correct risk-benefit evaluation, the following aspects should be considered: actual knowledge about the pathology-specific efficacy of the various techniques, the average age of onset of POI, the possible risks associated with the procedure in relation to the underlying pathology, the probability of spontaneous conception, as well as the health implications of a possible future pregnancy.. CONCLUSIONS Fertility preservation techniques represent a crucial opportunity for patients with genetic risk of POI. Early diagnosis increases the chances to apply these techniques. No specific recommendations concerning fertility preservation for each genetic pathology are available, and clinicians should first counsel the patient and her relatives about known risks and benefits of the available techniques, both those established and those considered as experimental.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio La Marca
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. .,Clinica Eugin Modena, Modena, Italy.
| | - Elisa Mastellari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fredriksson A, Rosenberg E, Einbeigi Z, Bergh C, Strandell A. Gonadotrophin stimulation and risk of relapse in breast cancer. Hum Reprod Open 2021; 2021:hoaa061. [PMID: 33501382 PMCID: PMC7810817 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is gonadotrophin stimulation as part of IVF associated with an increased risk of relapse in breast cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in connection with IVF in women with previous breast cancer was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer relapse. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide and the leading cause of cancer death among females. The use of COS with gonadotrophins with subsequent cryopreservation of oocytes or embryos in order to enhance the chances of pregnancy after cancer treatment is the current most established fertility preservation method for women with breast cancer. To date, there are only a few small retrospective hospital-based controlled studies evaluating the risk of breast cancer relapse in patients undergoing fertility preservation with or without COS, showing no evident risk of relapse in breast cancer after the use of gonadotoxic agents. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study comprising 5857 women with previous breast cancer of whom 337 were exposed to COS. Exposure (COS) and outcomes (relapse and death) were identified for all patients from 2005 to 2014 by assessing the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction, the Swedish Medical Birth Register, the National Patient Register, the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, the Swedish Cause of Death Register, the National Breast Cancer Register and the Swedish Cancer Register. Matching according to set criteria was possible for 334 women, who constituted the control group. A total of 274 women had undergone IVF after completing breast cancer treatment and 63 women had undergone COS for fertility preservation at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women aged 20–44 years previously diagnosed with breast cancer and exposed to COS were matched for age at breast cancer diagnosis ±5 years, tumour size and lymph node involvement with a non-exposed control group, including women with known T- and N-stages. In a subsequent analysis, the matched cohort was assessed by also including women with unknown T- and N-stages. A secondary analysis comprised the entire non-matched cohort, including all women with known T- and N-stages. Also here, a subsequent analysis included women with missing data for T- and N-stages. The risk of relapse in breast cancer was estimated as crude hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI using Cox proportional hazards models in the primary and secondary analyses where T- and N-stages were known: otherwise the risks of relapse were only given descriptively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the primary matched analysis, relapse occurred in 20 of 126 women exposed to COS (15.9%) compared with 39 of 126 (31.0%) in the control cohort (HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.39–1.45; P = 0.22). In the subsequent analysis, also including women with unknown T- and N-stages, relapse occurred in 27 of 337 (8.0%) women having undergone COS compared with 71/334 (21.3%) among the non-exposed. In the secondary adjusted analysis, relapse occurred in 20 of 126 (15.9%) exposed women and in 918 of 3729 (24.6%) non-exposed women (HR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.49–1.33; P = 0.70). In the subsequent analysis, including unknown T- and N-stages, relapse occurred in 27 of 337 (8.0%) women in the exposed group and 1176 of 5520 (21.3%) in the non-exposed cohort. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION A substantial degree of missing data on important prognostic variables was a limitation, particularly when analysing the total cohort. Furthermore, data on confounding factors, such as BMI, were not completely covered. Another limitation was that a pre-specified variable for relapse was not in use for the majority of the National Breast Cancer Register. Furthermore, the follow-up time from available register data (2005–2014) is rather short. Finally, we cannot be sure whether the prognostic information from receptor status, showing a lower incidence in the exposed group, is representative. Information on T- and N-stages was missing in more than half of the patients. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In this large, retrospective, matched cohort study, we found no increased risk of relapse in breast cancer among women who had been exposed to gonadotrophins as part of IVF. This is reassuring but might be confounded by the selection of a group of women with a more favourable prognosis than those not undergoing IVF. The present study strengthens previous findings by being large, national and register based. Its results are applicable to women undergoing fertility preservation as well as to those undergoing regular IVF treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Supported in part by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-720291), The Assar Gabrielsson Fund (FB 15-20), The Breast Cancer Fund and the Swedish Association of Local authorities and Regions, SKR. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION N/A
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fredriksson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SE 413 45, Sweden
| | - E Rosenberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SE 413 45, Sweden
| | - Z Einbeigi
- Department of Medicine, Southern Älvsborg Hospital, Borås, SE 501 82, Sweden
| | - C Bergh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SE 413 45, Sweden
| | - A Strandell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SE 413 45, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- Hatem A Azim
- Hatem A. Azim Jr, MD, PhD, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; Lieveke Ameye, MSc, PhD and Marianne Paesmans, MSc, Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; and Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Lieveke Ameye
- Hatem A. Azim Jr, MD, PhD, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; Lieveke Ameye, MSc, PhD and Marianne Paesmans, MSc, Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; and Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marianne Paesmans
- Hatem A. Azim Jr, MD, PhD, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; Lieveke Ameye, MSc, PhD and Marianne Paesmans, MSc, Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; and Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Hatem A. Azim Jr, MD, PhD, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; Lieveke Ameye, MSc, PhD and Marianne Paesmans, MSc, Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; and Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Poorvu PD, Gelber SI, Zheng Y, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Lambertini M, Rosenberg SM, Partridge AH. Pregnancy after breast cancer: Results from a prospective cohort of young women with breast cancer. Cancer 2020; 127:1021-1028. [PMID: 33259061 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer are interested in future pregnancies. Prospective data regarding fertility interest and reproductive patterns after diagnosis are needed to counsel patients. METHODS The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study is a multicenter, prospective cohort of women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤40 years between 2006 and 2016. Women complete surveys at baseline, every 6 months for 3 years, then annually. Here, the authors describe fertility interest and pregnancies within 5 years of diagnosis for women with stage 0 through III breast cancer. RESULTS Of 1026 eligible participants, 368 (36%) reported interest in future biologic children at least once within 5 years after diagnosis, including 16% at 5 years after diagnosis. Among 130 women who attempted to become pregnant, 90 (69.2%) conceived; and, among 896 women who did not attempt to conceive, 18 (2.0%) became pregnant, with a total of 152 pregnancies resulting in 91 live births. Factors associated with pregnancy included younger versus older age at diagnosis (aged ≤30 vs 36-40 years: odds ratio [OR], 6.63; 95% CI, 3.18-13.83; P < .0001; aged 31-35 vs 36-40 years: OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 3.37-10.17; P < .0001) and being nulliparous versus parous (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.56-4.53; P = .001). The receipt of endocrine therapy versus no endocrine therapy (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.20-0.59; P = .001) was inversely associated with pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Many women remain interested in future fertility in the 4 years after a breast cancer diagnosis, indicating that longitudinal fertility discussions are needed. Although a minority of those interested in having children attempted to become pregnant in the first 5 years, most who attempted to conceive did so and had live births.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip D Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shari I Gelber
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yue Zheng
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Virginia F Borges
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Steven E Come
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Medical Oncology Clinic, IRCCS San Maritino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Shoshana M Rosenberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Stewart K, Campbell S, Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT, McKenzie LJ. Fertility considerations prior to conservative management of gynecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:339-344. [PMID: 33177151 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility-sparing management of early-stage gynecologic cancers is becoming more prevalent as increasing evidence demonstrates acceptable oncologic and reproductive outcomes in appropriately selected patients. However, in the absence of randomized controlled trials, most of the commonly used treatment algorithms are based only on observational studies. As women are increasingly postponing childbearing, the need for evidence-based guidance on the optimal selection of appropriate candidates for fertility-sparing therapies is paramount. It is imperative to seriously consider the fertility potential of a given individual prior to making major oncologic treatment decisions that may deviate from the accepted standard of care. It is a disservice to patients to undergo a fertility-sparing procedure in hopes of ultimately achieving a live birth, only to determine later they have poor baseline fertility potential or other substantial barriers to conception including excess financial toxicity. Many women with oncologic diagnoses are of advanced maternal age and their obstetric and neonatal risks must be considered. In the era of advanced assisted reproductive technologies, patients should be provided realistic expectations regarding success rates while understanding the potential oncologic perils. A multidisciplinary approach to the conservative treatment of early-stage gynecologic cancers with early referral to reproductive specialists as well as maternal-fetal medicine specialists is warranted. In this review, we discuss the recommended fertility evaluation for patients with newly diagnosed, early-stage gynecologic cancers who are considering fertility-sparing management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Stewart
- Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sukhkamal Campbell
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Laurie J McKenzie
- Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA .,Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Athman Omar AM, Abdel-Bary A, Elsaka RO. Tamoxifen exposure in pregnancy after synchronous breast and thyroid cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 14:1125. [PMID: 33209116 PMCID: PMC7652426 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Thyroid and breast cancer are the most common cancers among young women, which are either synchronous or metachronous, but the association is yet to be elucidated. With the improvement of diagnosis and treatment, there is an increase in breast and thyroid cancer survivors. Hence, attention is shifting towards survivorship. Here, we report the case of a young lady diagnosed with synchronous thyroid and breast cancer who unexpectedly became pregnant during tamoxifen treatment. After a multidisciplinary discussion, endocrine therapy was interrupted and she delivered a healthy baby at term. In conclusion, oncologists should be aware of breast and thyroid cancer co-occurrence and examinations should be conducted together in diagnosis and follow-up. Also, pregnancy is feasible and can be considered after synchronous breast and thyroid cancer diagnosis. Physicians need to emphasise the use of barrier contraceptives to patients undergoing endocrine therapy. However, the optimum timing for pregnancy after breast cancer and the safety of endocrine therapy interruption in hormonal-positive patients should be discussed and managed by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abeid M Athman Omar
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champlion Street, Alazarita, Alexandria 21131, Egypt.,https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4081-8547
| | - Amany Abdel-Bary
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champlion Street, Alazarita, Alexandria 21131, Egypt.,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-8903
| | - Rasha O Elsaka
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champlion Street, Alazarita, Alexandria 21131, Egypt.,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-8302
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Safety of pregnancy occurring after breast cancer treatment has been studied largely, but it is still debatable. These studies have generally showed that overall and disease-free survival in breast cancer survivors with subsequent pregnancy is not less than those without future pregnancy . Also, breast cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy , radiation therapy, or both had no increased risk of congenital anomalies, single gene disorders, or chromosomal syndromes in their offspring. However, it appears that the incidence of preterm labor, low birth weight, and fetal anomalies is higher in these cases.These issues as well as safe time interval from breast cancer treatment to pregnancy , safe contraceptive method after breast cancer, counseling about pregnancy in survivors, and how to follow up the patient for breast cancer recurrence during pregnancy are discussed in this chapter.
Collapse
|
42
|
Amaadour L, El Mrabet FZ, Atreche L, El Rhazi K, Oualla K, Benbrahim Z, Arifi S, Mellas N. [Chemotherapy induced ovarian failure in breast cancer: Retrospective study of 100 cases]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:854-860. [PMID: 32762944 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancers affect about a quarter of women of reproductive age worldwide. Chemotherapy is frequently indicated due to the aggressive biomolecular cancer subtypes usually observed in the localized forms, which may compromise the fertility of these young patients. The aim of our study is to report the incidence of chemotherapy induced ovarian failure in premenopausal breast cancer patients after chemotherapy, and to identify related risk factors. METHODS It is a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study which included all premenopausal patients with early breast cancer treated at the department of medical oncology, Hassan II University Hospital of Fez, during a period of one year. Chemotherapy induced amenorrhea (CIA) and associated risk factors were studied. RESULTS The study included 100 patients. The mean age of the subjects was 36 years. The incidence of CIA was 82 %, 66.7 % regained menstruations. Risk factors associated with CIA were analyzed, only the patient age at diagnosis was found to be statistically significantly associated with CIA. CONCLUSION Our study found a high incidence of CIOF (Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure) with a relatively low incidence of reversible amenorrhea. Only the patient age has been shown to be an independent factor, statistically significantly associated with ovarian failure after chemotherapy. Methods of fertility preservation should be considered in those patients to reduce the impact of chemotherapy on ovarian reserves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Loubna Atreche
- CHU Hassan II de Fès, service d'oncologie médicale, Maroc
| | | | - Karima Oualla
- CHU Hassan II de Fès, service d'oncologie médicale, Maroc
| | | | - Samia Arifi
- CHU Hassan II de Fès, service d'oncologie médicale, Maroc
| | - Nawfel Mellas
- CHU Hassan II de Fès, service d'oncologie médicale, Maroc
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lambertini M, Ameye L, Hamy AS, Zingarello A, Poorvu PD, Carrasco E, Grinshpun A, Han S, Rousset-Jablonski C, Ferrari A, Paluch-Shimon S, Cortesi L, Senechal C, Miolo G, Pogoda K, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, De Marchis L, Ponzone R, Livraghi L, Estevez-Diz MDP, Villarreal-Garza C, Dieci MV, Clatot F, Berlière M, Graffeo R, Teixeira L, Córdoba O, Sonnenblick A, Luna Pais H, Ignatiadis M, Paesmans M, Partridge AH, Caron O, Saule C, Del Mastro L, Peccatori FA, Azim HA. Pregnancy After Breast Cancer in Patients With Germline BRCA Mutations. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3012-3023. [PMID: 32673153 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Young women with germline BRCA mutations have unique reproductive challenges. Pregnancy after breast cancer does not increase the risk of recurrence; however, very limited data are available in patients with BRCA mutations. This study investigated the impact of pregnancy on breast cancer outcomes in patients with germline BRCA mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients were diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2012 with invasive early breast cancer at age ≤ 40 years and harbored deleterious germline BRCA mutations. Primary end points were pregnancy rate, and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with and without a pregnancy after breast cancer. Pregnancy outcomes and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points. Survival analyses were adjusted for guarantee-time bias controlling for known prognostic factors. RESULTS Of 1,252 patients with germline BRCA mutations (BRCA1, 811 patients; BRCA2, 430 patients; BRCA1/2, 11 patients) included, 195 had at least 1 pregnancy after breast cancer (pregnancy rate at 10 years, 19%; 95% CI, 17% to 22%). Induced abortions and miscarriages occurred in 16 (8.2%) and 20 (10.3%) patients, respectively. Among the 150 patients who gave birth (76.9%; 170 babies), pregnancy complications and congenital anomalies occurred in 13 (11.6%) and 2 (1.8%) cases, respectively. Median follow-up from breast cancer diagnosis was 8.3 years. No differences in DFS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.23; P = .41) or OS (adjusted HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.56; P = .66) were observed between the pregnancy and nonpregnancy cohorts. CONCLUSION Pregnancy after breast cancer in patients with germline BRCA mutations is safe without apparent worsening of maternal prognosis and is associated with favorable fetal outcomes. These results provide reassurance to patients with BRCA-mutated breast cancer interested in future fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lieveke Ameye
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Anna Zingarello
- Département Médecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Philip D Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Estela Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Grinshpun
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sileny Han
- Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Alberta Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Gianmaria Miolo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Katarzyna Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Laura De Marchis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ponzone
- Gynecological Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Livraghi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.,University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz
- Department of Oncology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo-Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Departamento de Investigacion y de Tumores Mamarios, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico.,Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Martine Berlière
- Department of Oncology, Breast Clinic, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rossella Graffeo
- Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Luis Teixeira
- Breast Disease Unit Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, Inserm, U976 HIPI Unit, F-75010, Paris, France
| | - Octavi Córdoba
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain
| | - Amir Sonnenblick
- Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Helena Luna Pais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte-Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianne Paesmans
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Olivier Caron
- Département Médecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Claire Saule
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fedro A Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Hatem A Azim
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Müller C, Juhasz-Böss S, Schmidt G, Solomayer EF, Juhasz-Böss I, Breitbach GP. Factors Influencing the Onset of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 15:182-187. [PMID: 32398988 PMCID: PMC7204773 DOI: 10.1159/000502223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Time to treatment onset (TTTO) is critical in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We therefore investigated possible delaying factors of therapy onset. METHODS All patients were included who qualified for NACT in our hospital from 2015 to 2017. The time interval between core biopsy of tumor and date of therapy onset was defined as primary endpoint. Among other things, age, out- and in-patient presentation, and study or standard treatment were investigated as potentially delaying factors. RESULTS We analyzed 139 patients scheduled for NACT; 90 (64.7%) received standard NACT, and 49 (35.3%) were recruited for trials. The average age was 53 years (±13.2 years). A time interval of 30.7 days (±11.8 days) was seen between diagnosis and therapy onset. Patients had a mean of 5 (±1.9) pretherapeutic presentations, 4 (±1.8) on outpatient and 1 (±0.5) on inpatient basis, being of significant influence on TTTO. CONCLUSION Any outpatient presentation extended the time interval by 2 days, inpatient presentation by 4 days. These presentations should be merged in order to minimize TTTO. Neither the site of pathology examinations, additional consultations (genetics, reproductive medicine), nor study participation delayed therapy onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hampe ME, Rhoton-Vlasak AS. Fertility preservation in breast cancer with case-based examples for guidance. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:717-729. [PMID: 32008180 PMCID: PMC7125269 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01665-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
With more young breast cancer survivors, a trend toward having children later in life, and improvements in assisted reproductive technology (ART), fertility preserving techniques are of growing importance prior to initiation of gonadotoxic treatments. The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) updated their Fertility Preservation in Patients with Cancer guidelines in April of 2018. ASCO continues to recognize oocyte and embryo cryopreservation as standard practice for women interested in preserving fertility and sperm cryopreservation as standard practice for men. ASCO has clarified their statement on ovarian suppression during chemotherapy as an option when standard methods are unavailable but should not be used as the sole method of fertility preservation (FP) due to conflicting evidence. ASCO also updated their statement on ovarian tissue cryopreservation, which is still labeled experimental but ASCO acknowledges that it can restore global ovarian function and could be of use in specific patients. The NCCN's Version 1.2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines® for treatment of breast cancer include fertility counseling as part of their work-up in all types of breast cancer for premenopausal women.The purpose of this review is to explain the indications and evidence for the different methods of FP for young breast cancer patients in accordance with ASCO and NCCN guidelines. The guidance will then be applied to three theoretical clinical cases in order to highlight actual use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Hampe
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Alice S Rhoton-Vlasak
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fertility in female cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41:96-112. [PMID: 32456969 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Data on the effects of cancer treatments on fertility are conflicting. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the chances of childbirth in women survivors of different types of cancer. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus were searched from database inception to 17 July 2019 for published cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies that investigated the reproductive chances in women survivors of different cancer types. Random-effects models were used to pool childbirth hazard ratios, relative risks, rate ratios and odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were estimated; 18 eligible studies were identified. Childbirth chances were significantly reduced in women with a history of bone cancer (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.97; I2 = 0%; P = 0.02 (two studies); RaR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.95; I2 = 69%; P = 0.01 (two studies); breast cancer (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.90 (one study); RaR 0.51, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.57; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001 (two studies); brain cancer (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.72; I2 = 14%; P < 0.00001 (three studies); RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.91 (one study); RaR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.60; I2 = 95%; P < 0.00001 (four studies); OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.60 (one study); and kidney cancer (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.98 (one study); RaR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.78 (one study). Reproductive chances in women survivors of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, melanoma and thyroid cancer were unaffected. Women with a history of bone, breast, brain or kidney cancer have reduced chances of childbirth. Thyroid cancer, melanoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors can be reassured.
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Over the past decades, progresses in oncology have improved the recovery rates after numerous malignant diseases, including breast cancer, that strike young adults in childbearing age. Quality of life of young cancer survivors has become a major issue. However, anticancer therapies can have a detrimental impact on fertility. It is now well-established that all patients should receive information about the fertility risks associated with their cancer treatment and the fertility preservation options available. These techniques aim to limit the negative impact of chemotherapy on the ovaries or to preserve gametes before treatment. Currently, oocyte or embryo freezing after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation represents the most effective method for preserving female fertility. Over the past years innovative protocols of ovarian stimulation have been developed to enable breast cancer patients to undergo oocyte or embryo cryopreservation irrespective of the phase of the cycle or without exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone related increase in serum estradiol levels. When controlled ovarian hyperstimualtion cannot be implemented, other techniques such as cryopreservation of ovarian cortex, in vitro maturation or the use of GnRH agonists may be proposed. However, it is important to inform patients that all these fertility preservation techniques do not represent a guarantee of pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Sonigo
- Service de médecine de la reproduction et préservation de la fertilité, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, 92140 Clamart, France; INSERM U1185, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Michaël Grynberg
- Service de médecine de la reproduction et préservation de la fertilité, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, 92140 Clamart, France; INSERM U1133, Université Paris-Diderot, 75013 Paris, France; Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
| | - Sophie Bringer
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, CHRU, 371, avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | - Nathalie Sermondade
- Service de biologie de la reproduction - CECOS, hôpital Tenon, 75020 Ap-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Breast cancer affects about 3,000 new women of childbearing age each year. The desire for pregnancy is therefore a frequent issue in the management of breast cancer. We reviewed the current state of knowledge and recommendations in high-risk women, on the consideration of this desire for pregnancy in therapeutic management, the way to approach it, the preservation of fertility in the care process and finally on the outcomes of pregnancy after breast cancer. We evaluated the desire for pregnancy, qualitatively and quantitatively, after breast cancer through a literature review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Elies
- Département d'oncologie chirurgicale, hôpital René-Huguenin, Institut Curie, 35, rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Eleonora Salakos
- Département d'oncologie chirurgicale, hôpital René-Huguenin, Institut Curie, 35, rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Roman Rouzier
- Département d'oncologie chirurgicale, hôpital René-Huguenin, Institut Curie, 35, rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chuang S, Lin C, Lu Y, Hsiung CA. Mortality of Pregnancy Following Breast Cancer Diagnoses in Taiwanese Women. Oncologist 2020; 25:e252-e258. [PMID: 32043784 PMCID: PMC7011637 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This work examined the association between pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and total mortality in Taiwanese patients with BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Taiwan Cancer Registry, National Health Insurance database, and Taiwan National Death Certificate database were reviewed. Patients who became pregnant after being diagnosed with BC were selected (n = 249). Four nonpregnant patients with BC were selected and matched to every pregnant patient with BC by age at diagnosis, year at diagnosis, and propensity score based on disease stage, tumor size, node involvement, and histological grade. The disease-free time interval for the selected control needed to have been longer than the time interval between the cancer diagnosis and pregnancy for the index case. Follow-up was calculated from the pregnancy date of the index case to the date of death or December 31, 2014, whichever came first. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS After adjusting for age, year at BC diagnosis, stage, positive nodes, and hormone therapy, patients with BC who became pregnant after their cancer diagnosis had lower total mortality than did the comparison group (HR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.23-0.84), including that of estrogen receptor-positive patients (HR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07-0.77). The inverse association was more pronounced for those who became pregnant more than 3 years after diagnosis (HR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.05-0.78). CONCLUSION Our nationwide retrospective analysis revealed that pregnancy after BC diagnosis was associated with lower mortality than that of nonpregnant patients with BC at a similar age, year at diagnosis, and clinical characteristics. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This article provides high-level evidence based on an Asian population for pregnancy counseling after a breast cancer diagnosis, including for patients with estrogen receptor-positive cancers. The study also revealed the optimal time for patients who would like to become pregnant after breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu‐Chun Chuang
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research InstitutesZhunanMiaoli CountyTaiwan
| | - Ching‐Hung Lin
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Yen‐Shen Lu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chao Agnes Hsiung
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research InstitutesZhunanMiaoli CountyTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ter Welle-Butalid MEE, Vriens IJHI, Derhaag JGJ, Leter EME, de Die-Smulders CEC, Smidt MM, van Golde RJTR, Tjan-Heijnen VCGV. Counseling young women with early breast cancer on fertility preservation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:2593-2604. [PMID: 31760547 PMCID: PMC6910894 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01615-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with early-stage breast cancer may still have a future child wish, while chemotherapy may impair fertility. To pursue on fertility preservation shortly after breast cancer diagnosis is complex. This review holds a critical reflection on all topics that need to be counseled to give them the opportunity to make a well-informed decision before starting any oncological treatment. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was performed on papers published in English language on breast cancer in young women, risk of chemotherapy-induced infertility, fertility preservation techniques, impact of possible mutation carriership, and future pregnancy outcome. RESULTS Below 40 years of age, the risk of permanent chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure is approximately 20%, where taxanes do not significantly add to this risk. Overall, 23% of reported women who performed fertility preservation by cryopreserving oocytes or embryos returned for embryo transfer. Of these, 40% gave live birth. Both fertility preservation in women diagnosed with breast cancer and pregnancy after treatment seem safe with respect to breast cancer survival. Women who have a genetic predisposition for breast cancer like BRCA gene mutation should also be informed about the possibility of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Women with an early stage of breast cancer and a possible future child wish should be referred to an expertise center in breast cancer, fertility preservation, and genetics in this complex decision-making process, shortly after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Elena Ter Welle-Butalid
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - I J H Ingeborg Vriens
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J G Josien Derhaag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E M Edward Leter
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C E Christine de Die-Smulders
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M Marjolein Smidt
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R J T Ron van Golde
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - V C G Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Internal Medicine, division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|