Comprehensive Care Improvement for Oncologic Fever and Neutropenia from a Pediatric Emergency Department

Introduction

Rapid time to antibiotics (TTA) for pediatric patients with fever and neutropenia in an emergency department decreases in-hospital mortality. Additionally, national guidelines recommend outpatient antibiotic management strategies for low-risk fever and neutropenia (LRFN). This study had two specific aims: (1) improve the percent of patients with suspected fever and neutropenia who receive antibiotics within 60 minutes of arrival from 55% to 90%, and (2) develop and operationalize a process for outpatient management of LRFN patients by October 2018.

Methods

Using Lean methodologies, we implemented Plan-Do-Check-Act cycles focused on guideline development, electronic medical record reminders, order-set development, and a LRFN pathway as root causes for improvements. We used statistical process control charts to assess results.

Results

The project conducted from July 2016 to October 2018 showed special cause improvement in December 2016 on a G-chart. Monthly Xbar-chart showed improvement in average TTA from 68.5 minutes to 42.5 minutes. A P-chart showed improvement in patients receiving antibiotics within 60 minutes, from 55% to 86.4%. A LRFN guideline and workflow was developed and implemented in October 2017.

Conclusions

Implementation of guidelines, electronic medical record reminders, and order sets are useful tools to improve TTA for suspected fever and neutropenia. Utilizing more sensitive statistical process control charts early in projects with fewer patients can help recognize and guide process improvement. The development of workflows for outpatient management of LRFN may be possible, though it requires further study.

Pediatric patients who receive antibiotics for fever and neutropenia in less than 60 min have decreased intensive care needs

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic delivery to patients with fever and neutropenia (F&N) in <60 min is an increasingly important quality measure for oncology centers, but several published reports indicate that a time to antibiotic delivery (TTA) of <60 min is quite difficult to achieve. Here we report a quality improvement (QI) effort that sought to decrease TTA and assess associated clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with cancer and F&N.

PROCEDURE

We used Lean-Methodology and a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to direct QI efforts and prospectively tracked TTA measures and associated clinical outcomes (length of stay, duration of fever, use of imaging studies to search for occult infection, bacteremia, intensive care unit (ICU) consultation or admission, and mortality). We then performed statistical analysis to determine the impact of our QI interventions on total TTA, sub-process times, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Our QI interventions significantly improved TTA such that we are now able to deliver antibiotics in <60 min nearly 100% of the time. All TTA sub-process times also improved. Moreover, achieving TTA <60 min significantly reduced the need for ICU consultation or admission (P = 0.003) in this population.

CONCLUSION

Here we describe our QI effort along with a detailed assessment of several associated clinical outcomes. These data indicate that decreasing TTA to <60 min is achievable and associated with improved outcomes in pediatric patients with cancer and F&N.

Why pediatric patients with cancer visit the emergency department: United States, 2006-2010

BACKGROUND

Little is known about emergency department (ED) use among pediatric patients with cancer. We explored reasons prompting ED visits and factors associated with hospital admission.

PROCEDURE

A retrospective cohort analysis of pediatric ED visits from 2006 to 2010 using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, the largest all-payer database of United States ED visits. Pediatric patients with cancer (ages ≤19 years) were identified using Clinical Classification Software. Proportion of visits and disposition for the top ten-ranking non-cancer diagnoses were determined. Weighted multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze factors associated with admission versus discharge.

RESULTS

There were 294,289 ED visits by pediatric patients with cancer in the U.S. over the study period. Fever and fever with neutropenia (FN) were the two most common diagnoses, accounting for almost 20% of visits. Forty-four percent of pediatric patients with cancer were admitted to the same hospital, with admission rates up to 82% for FN. Risk factors for admission were: FN (odds ratio (OR) 8.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.97-12.34); neutropenia alone (OR 7.28; 95% CI 5.08-10.43), ages 0-4 years compared with 15-19 years (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.08-1.31) and highest median household income ZIP code (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.08-1.49) compared with lowest. "Self-pay" visits had lower odds of admission (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.35-0.51) compared with public payer.

CONCLUSION

FN was the most common reason for ED visits among pediatric patients with cancer and is the condition most strongly associated with admission. Socioeconomic factors appear to influence ED disposition for this population.

Evidence-based approach to treatment of febrile neutropenia in hematologic malignancies

Applying the principles of evidence-based medicine to febrile neutropenia (FN) results in a more limited set of practices than expected. Hundreds of studies over the last 4 decades have produced evidence to support the following: (1) risk stratification allows the identification of a subset of patients who may be safely managed as outpatients given the right health care environment; (2) antibacterial prophylaxis for high-risk patients who remain neutropenic for ≥ 7 days prevents infections and decreases mortality; (3) the empirical management of febrile neutropenia with a single antipseudomonal beta-lactam results in the same outcome and less toxicity than combination therapy using aminoglycosides; (4) vancomycin should not be used routinely empirically either as part of the initial regimen or for persistent fever, but rather should be added when a pathogen that requires its use is isolated; (5) empirical antifungal therapy should be added after 4 days of persistent fever in patients at high risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI); the details of the characterization as high risk and the choice of agent remain debatable; and (6) preemptive antifungal therapy in which the initiation of antifungals is postponed and triggered by the presence, in addition to fever, of other clinical findings, computed tomography (CT) results, and serological tests for fungal infection is an acceptable strategy in a subset of patients. Many practical management questions remain unaddressed.