Clinicopathological characteristics of new primary melanomas in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved survival in advanced stage melanoma patients. Rates of new primary melanomas (NPM) in patients with prior melanoma have been reported to be as high as 12%. Little is currently known regarding the frequency or characteristics of NPMs occurring in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

AIM

To determine the frequency and describe clinicopathologic characteristics of NPMs diagnosed in patients during or after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Melanoma Institute Australia and Westmead Hospital Dermatology databases. Clinicopathological data for the initial primary melanoma (IPM) and NPM were compared.

RESULTS

Between 2013-2017, 14 NPMs in 13 patients (out of a total of 1047) treated with checkpoint inhibitors were identified. NPMs were significantly thinner than the IPM (median Breslow thickness 0.35 mm vs 2.0 mm, P = 0.0003), less likely to be ulcerated (0/14 vs 6/13, P = 0.004) and less likely to have nodal metastases (0/14 vs 6/13, P = 0.004). NPMs were significantly more likely to be detected in the in-situ stage (6/14 vs 0/13, P = 0.0016).

CONCLUSION

NPMs are infrequent in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors. When they occur, they are usually detected at an early stage and have features associated with a favourable prognosis, most likely reflecting close surveillance. Further study is required to determine long-term risk in patients achieving a durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, and to determine whether the immunotherapy itself influences both their development and biology.

Immunotherapy and targeted therapies in older patients with advanced melanoma; Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology review paper

Malignant melanoma is an aggressive cancer associated with a poor prognosis in patients with metastatic disease. As in many other cancers, the incidence of melanoma rises with age; and combined with the longer life expectancy, this led to an increasing prevalence of melanoma in the older population. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly improved the treatment of melanoma given their efficacy and tolerability profile. Two major classes of agents include the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, such as ipilimumab, and the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Treatment of metastatic disease with immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated improved efficacy and better safety profiles compared to cytotoxic drugs and appears to be an attractive treatment option. Nevertheless, there is a need for tools designed to better predict which older patients will benefit from its use and who will experience toxicities related to the treatment. Current data do not show a major increase in toxicity rates in older patients. However, patients above 75 are often under-represented and those who are included are not representative of the general population of older patients, thereby also stressing the need for real-life data. Ongoing research is aiming at maximizing the potential treatment efficacy and developing novel immune-targeting modalities. Future studies should include older patients and assess geriatric domains in these older patients to better guide decision-making. This review discusses published clinical trials and where known, the efficacy and toxicity in older patients. Moreover, the clinical implications and future perspectives are discussed, with current recommendations for older patients, management of toxicities, and a proposal for an initial approach to the treatment of older patients with metastatic melanoma.

Downregulation of CD147 induces malignant melanoma cell apoptosis via the regulation of IGFBP2 expression

Cluster of differentiation (CD)147, as a transmembrane glycoprotein, is highly expressed in a variety of tumors. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that CD147 serves critical roles in tumor cell death and survival; however, the underlying mechanism requires further investigation. In the present study, it was revealed that CD147 knockdown significantly increased melanoma cell apoptosis. In addition, downregulation of CD147 reversed the malignant phenotype of melanoma, as demonstrated by the induction of tumor cell apoptosis in a xenograft mouse model. In addition, a human apoptosis antibody array was performed and 9 differentially expressed apoptosis-related proteins associated with CD147 were identified, including insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 (IGFBP2). Additionally, CD147 knockdown was observed to significantly decreased IGFBP2 expression at the mRNA and protein levels in melanoma cells. Providing that IGFBP2 is a downstream molecule in the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathway, the effects of CD147 on this particular pathway were investigated. Interestingly, the expression of phosphorylated (p)-AKT and p‑mechanistic target of rapamycin was attenuated, whereas PTEN was markedly upregulated in CD147-underexpressing melanoma cells. Furthermore, application of a PI3K‑specific inhibitor also decreased IGFBP2 expression. Importantly, IGFBP2 was highly expressed in clinical tissues of melanoma compared with the control group, and its expression exhibited a positive association with CD147. The present study revealed that CD147 served a critical role in mediating the apoptosis of melanoma cells via IGFBP2 and the PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. IGFBP2 and CD147 were observed to be overexpressed in clinical melanoma tissues; IGFBP2 was shown to be positively associated with CD147 expression, suggesting that CD147 may be considered as a potential therapeutic target for chemotherapy or prevention for in melanoma.

The safety and efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib for the treatment of melanoma

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of BRAF and MEK inhibitors into clinical practice improved the prognosis of metastatic melanoma patients. The combination of BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib with MEK inhibitor trametinib has shown its superiority to single agent therapy and is characterized by a tolerable spectrum of adverse events which shows a decrease in incidence over time on treatment. Areas covered: The current scientific literature on safety and adverse events (AEs) related to BRAF and MEK-inhibition has been investigated with special focus on the large phase 3 studies (COMBI-v, COMBI-d and CoBRIM) as well as recent updates presented at oncology and melanoma meetings. Additionally, published case series/case reports were screened for information on AEs. Expert opinion: Even though almost every patient (98%) under combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib experiences at least one adverse event, these are generally mild to moderate, reversible and can be managed with dose reductions or interruptions. However, due to an increased life expectancy, there is a substantial need to prevent and treat also mild adverse events, as they play a central role for the quality of life of patients. Ongoing clinical trials will have to demonstrate the efficacy as well as safety of triple combination with anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies.

Integrating first-line treatment options into clinical practice: what's new in advanced melanoma?

Melanoma remains a serious form of skin cancer in Europe and worldwide. Localized, early-stage melanomas can usually be treated with surgical excision. However, the prognosis is poorer for patients with advanced disease. Before 2011, treatment for advanced melanoma included palliative surgery and/or radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy, such as interleukin-2. As none of these treatments had shown survival benefits in patients with advanced melanoma, European guidelines had recommended that patients be entered into clinical trials. The lack of approved first-line options and varying access to clinical trials meant that European clinicians relied on experimental regimens and chemotherapy-based treatments when no other options were available. Since 2011, ipilimumab, an immuno-oncology therapy, and vemurafenib and dabrafenib, targeted agents that inhibit mutant BRAF, have been approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of advanced melanoma. More recently, the MEK inhibitor, trametinib, received European marketing authorization for use in patients with BRAF mutation-positive advanced melanoma. In 2014, the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab was approved as a first-line therapy in Japan. Whereas nivolumab and another anti-PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab, were approved as second-line therapies in the USA, their recent approval in Europe are for first-line use based on new clinical trial data in this setting. Together these agents are changing clinical practice and making therapeutic decisions more complex. Here, we discuss current and emerging therapeutic options for the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma, and how these therapies can be optimized to provide the best possible outcomes for patients.

The use of vemurafenib in Australian patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma containing the V600 BRAF gene mutation

Metastatic melanoma remains one of the major causes of death related to skin cancers and has been resistant to traditional anticancer therapies. The clinical development of vemurafenib in the treatment of metastatic melanoma with the V600 mutation of the BRAF gene has provided meaningful improvements in the overall survival and progression-free survival of metastatic melanoma patients. However, significant side effects have been noted with this therapy, in particular cutaneous adverse events (AEs) such as rashes, squamous cell carcinoma and severe photosensitivity to UVA light among others. With an emphasis on the Australian perspective, this review provides an overview of the clinical development of vemurafenib, its attendant dose-limiting toxicities and other AEs, recommendations for safety monitoring, supportive treatments of AEs and dose modifications, with the aim of maximizing the chances of continuing beneficial treatment.