1
|
Testis Cancer Care in North Carolina: Implications for Real-World Evidence and Cancer Surveillance. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:307-318. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
2
|
Quantifying Decreased Radiation Exposure From Modern CT Scan Technology and Surveillance Programs of Germ Cell Tumors. Am J Clin Oncol 2018; 41:949-952. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
3
|
De La Pena H, Sharma A, Glicksman C, Joseph J, Subesinghe M, Traill Z, Verrill C, Sullivan M, Redgwell J, Bataillard E, Pintus E, Dallas N, Gogbashian A, Tuthill M, Protheroe A, Hall M. No longer any role for routine follow-up chest x-rays in men with stage I germ cell cancer. Eur J Cancer 2017; 84:354-359. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
4
|
Ondrusova M, Balogova S, Lehotska V, Kajo K, Mrinakova B, Ondrus D. Controversies in the management of clinical stage I testicular seminoma. Cent European J Urol 2016; 69:35-9. [PMID: 27123323 PMCID: PMC4846723 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2016.699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2015] [Revised: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Following orchiectomy patients with clinical stage I (CSI) testicular seminoma may be managed by active surveillance (AS) or adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy or chemotherapy). In view of the published data on long-term toxicity, mainly second malignant neoplasms (SMNs), adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) is currently no longer recommended as adjuvant therapy for these patients. The purpose of our recent study was to compare the impact of two selected treatment approaches – AS versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on survival in patients with CSI testicular seminoma. Material and methods The cross-sectional study analyzed a total of 106 patients collected at a single centre between 4/2008–8/2015, with CSI testicular seminoma, stratified into two groups according to risk-adapted therapeutic approaches. Results In group A (low-risk), consisting of 84 patients, who underwent AS, relapse occurred in 10 (11.9%) patients after a mean follow-up of 13.8 months. In group B (high-risk), consisting of 22 patients, who were treated with ACT, relapse occurred in two (9.1%) patients after a mean follow-up of 13.8 months. Overall survival of patients in both groups was 100% with a mean follow-up of 25.3 months. The statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between these two groups was not found. Conclusions ACT seems to be adequate treatment for patients with high-risk of relapse, as well as AS for those with low-risk of relapse. Despite its excellent prognosis, optimal management of CSI testicular seminoma remains controversial, with variations in expert opinion and international guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Ondrusova
- St. Elisabeth University of Health and Social Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic; Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic; Pharm-In, Ltd., Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Sona Balogova
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Viera Lehotska
- 2 Department of Radiology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Karol Kajo
- Department of Pathology, Slovak Medical University & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Bela Mrinakova
- Department of Medical Oncology & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Dalibor Ondrus
- 1 Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ling H, Krassnig L, Bullock MD, Pichler M. MicroRNAs in Testicular Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis. Urol Clin North Am 2016; 43:127-34. [PMID: 26614035 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Testicular cancer processes a unique and clear miRNA expression signature. This differentiates testicular cancer from most other cancer types, which are usually more ambiguous when assigning miRNA patterns. As such, testicular cancer may represent a unique cancer type in which miRNAs find their use as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis, with a potential to surpass the current available markers usually with low sensitivity. In this review, we present literature findings on miRNAs associated with testicular cancer, and discuss their potential diagnostic and prognostic values, as well as their potential as indicators of drug response in patients with testicular cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Ling
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA
| | - Lisa Krassnig
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz (MUG), Graz, Austria
| | - Marc D Bullock
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA
| | - Martin Pichler
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz (MUG), Graz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Glaser SM, Vargo JA, Balasubramani GK, Beriwal S. Surveillance and Radiation Therapy for Stage I Seminoma—Have We Learned From the Evidence? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 94:75-84. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Revised: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
7
|
Woo J, Cohen SA, Grim JE. Targeted therapy in gastroesophageal cancers: past, present and future. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2015; 3:316-29. [PMID: 26510453 PMCID: PMC4650980 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gov052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal cancer is a significant global problem that frequently presents at an incurable stage and has very poor survival with standard chemotherapy approaches. This review will examine the epidemiology and molecular biology of gastroesophageal cancer and will focus on the key deregulated signaling pathways that have been targeted in the clinic. A comprehensive overview of clinical data highlighting successes and failures with targeted agents will be presented. Most notably, HER2-targeted therapy with the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has proven beneficial in first-line therapy and has been incorporated into standard practice. Targeting the VEGF pathway has also proven beneficial, and the VEGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody ramucirumab is now approved for second-line therapy. In contrast to these positive results, agents targeting the EGFR and MET pathways have been evaluated extensively in gastroesophageal cancer but have repeatedly failed to show benefit. An increased understanding of the molecular predictors of response to targeted therapies is sorely needed. In the future, improved molecular pathology approaches should subdivide this heterogeneous disease entity to allow individualization of cancer therapy based on integrated and global identification of deregulated signaling pathways. Better patient selection, rational combinations of targeted therapies and incorporation of emerging immunotherapeutic approaches should further improve the treatment of this deadly disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janghee Woo
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA and
| | - Stacey A Cohen
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA and
| | - Jonathan E Grim
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA and Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Darren R Feldman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Erasmus University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vaughn DJ. Reply to J. Beyer, T. Tandstad et al, S. Gillessen et al, J. Oldenburg et al, and L.C. Pagliaro et al. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:2324-5. [PMID: 26033814 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.4834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David J Vaughn
- Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tandstad T, Cohn-Cedermark G. Primum Non Nocere: What Hurts in Clinical Stage I Testicular Cancer? J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:2318-9. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.1152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Torgrim Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gillessen S, De Santis M, Rothermundt C. On Nonharming: The Debate Continues in Stage I Testicular Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:2319-20. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.1632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria De Santis
- Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital; and Applied Cancer Research–Institute for Translational Research and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute and Cluster Translational Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Beyer J. Early Gains Versus Late Pains: Management Options in Stage I Testicular Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:2318. [PMID: 26033802 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.0287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Beyer
- UniversitätsSpital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pagliaro LC, Tannir NM, Tu SM, Logothetis CJ. Management of Clinical Stage I Testicular Cancer: How Should We Define Success? J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:2321-2. [PMID: 26033805 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.60.8885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shi-Ming Tu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ondrusova M, Ondrus D, Miskovska V, Kajo K, Szoldova K, Usakova V, Stastna V. Management of clinical stage I testicular seminoma: active surveillance versus adjuvant chemotherapy. Int Urol Nephrol 2015; 47:1143-7. [DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-1002-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Accepted: 04/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|