Cetuximab Is Contraindicated in the Perioperative Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

The interference between oxaliplatin & anti-EGFR therapies: a different hypothesis to explain the 'unexplainable'

This paper has been written because we have a differing idea concerning the suspected negative interference between oxaliplatin and anti-EGFR therapies in cancer patients. Several multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trials investigated whether the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is improved by the addition of anti-EGFR therapies in patients affected by KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer. Results of these trials have produced puzzling findings, with some studies demonstrating improved survival and other studies showing no differences in overall survival between experimental and control arms. Moreover, a detrimental effect has been demonstrated in some settings. Nevertheless, the extent of this interaction remains uncertain. Some physicians proposed personal interpretations. This paper describes our hypothesis.

Patterns of progression, treatment of progressive disease and post-progression survival in the New EPOC study

BACKGROUND

The addition of cetuximab (CTX) to perioperative chemotherapy (CT) for operable colorectal liver metastases resulted in a shorter progression-free survival. Details of disease progression are described to further inform the primary study outcome.

METHODS

A total of 257 KRAS wild-type patients were randomised to CT alone or CT with CTX. Data regarding sites and treatment of progressive disease were obtained for the 109 (CT n=48, CT and CTX n=61) patients with progressive disease at the cut-off date for analysis of November 2012.

RESULTS

The liver was the most frequent site of progression (CT 67% (32/48); CT and CTX 66% (40/61)). A higher proportion of patients in the CT and group had multiple sites of progressive disease (CT 8%, 4/48; CT and CTX 23%, 14/61 P=0.04). Further treatment for progressive disease is known for 84 patients of whom 69 received further CT, most frequently irinotecan based. Twenty-two patients, 11 in each arm, received CTX as a further line agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the distribution of progressive disease and further treatment are as expected for such a cohort. The pattern of disease progression seen is consistent with failure of systemic micrometastatic disease control rather than failure of local disease control following liver surgery.

Systematic review of systemic adjuvant, neoadjuvant and perioperative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal-liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

The role of systemic chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is ambiguous. The aim of this review was to compare the outcomes of regimens using systemic neoadjuvant, adjuvant or perioperative (combination of pre and postoperative) chemotherapy, for the treatment of resectable CRLM.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for articles investigating the use of chemotherapy for adults with resectable CRLM. Randomized controlled trials reporting overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were screened for inclusion. PROSPERO record: CRD42015020609.

RESULTS

Four trials met the inclusion criteria (1098 patients). No significant improvement in median OS was achieved with chemotherapy/surgery compared with surgery-alone. Two trials demonstrated a significant improvement in DFS with chemotherapy/surgery compared to surgery-alone (Hazard ratio 0.78 (0.61-0.99) p = 0.04 and HR 0.66 (0.46-0.96) p = 0.03). Fluorouracil/folinic acid alone had a lower incidence of AEs than combination therapies, and the addition of cetuximab shortened DFS in one trial (HR 1.48 (1.04-2.12) p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of adequately powered trials of chemotherapy in combination with liver resection for CRLM, partly due to difficulties in recruitment. In an unselected patient group, FOLFOX in combination with liver resection appears to improve DFS compared to surgery-alone, but trials are underpowered for OS. Future trials will require prospective stratification of patients based on biomarkers predictive of response.

XGFR*, a novel affinity-matured bispecific antibody targeting IGF-1R and EGFR with combined signaling inhibition and enhanced immune activation for the treatment of pancreatic cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) play critical roles in tumor growth, providing a strong rationale for the combined inhibition of IGF-1R and EGFR signaling in cancer therapy. We describe the design, affinity maturation, in vitro and in vivo characterization of the bispecific anti-IGF-1R/EGFR antibody XGFR*. XGFR* is based on the bispecific IgG antibody XGFR, which enabled heterodimerization of an IGF-1R binding scFab heavy chain with an EGFR-binding light and heavy chain by the "knobs-into-holes" technology. XGFR* is optimized for monovalent binding of human EGFR and IGF-1R with increased binding affinity for IGF-1R due to affinity maturation and highly improved protein stability to oxidative and thermal stress. It bears an afucosylated Fc-portion for optimal induction of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Stable Chinese hamster ovary cell clones with production yields of 2-3 g/L were generated, allowing for large scale production of the bispecific antibody. XGFR* potently inhibits EGFR- and IGF-1R-dependent receptor phosphorylation, reduces tumor cell proliferation in cells with heterogeneous levels of IGF-1R and EGFR receptor expression and induces strong ADCC in vitro. A comparison of pancreatic and colorectal cancer lines demonstrated superior responsiveness to XGFR*-mediated signaling and tumor growth inhibition in pancreatic cancers that frequently show a high degree of IGF-1R/EGFR co-expression. XGFR* showed potent anti-tumoral efficacy in the orthotopic MiaPaCa-2 pancreatic xenograft model, resulting in nearly complete tumor growth inhibition with significant number of tumor remissions. In summary, the bispecific anti-IGF-1R/EGFR antibody XGFR* combines potent signaling and tumor growth inhibition with enhanced ADCC induction and represents a clinical development candidate for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.