1
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sam M Janes
- From the Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London (S.M.J., D.A.), the Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital (S.M.J.), London, and the University of Leicester, Leicester (D.A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Doraid Alrifai
- From the Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London (S.M.J., D.A.), the Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital (S.M.J.), London, and the University of Leicester, Leicester (D.A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Dean A Fennell
- From the Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London (S.M.J., D.A.), the Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital (S.M.J.), London, and the University of Leicester, Leicester (D.A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lester JF, Casbard AC, Al-Taei S, Harrop R, Katona L, Attanoos RL, Tabi Z, Griffiths GO. A single centre phase II trial to assess the immunological activity of TroVax® plus pemetrexed/cisplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma - the SKOPOS trial. Oncoimmunology 2018; 7:e1457597. [PMID: 30524880 PMCID: PMC6279419 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2018.1457597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Revised: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccines in combination with chemotherapy have been shown to be safe in different tumor types. We investigated the immunological activity of the TroVax® vaccine in combination with pemetrexed-cisplatin chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). In this first line, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients with locally advanced or metastatic MPM were enrolled. Eligible patients received up to 9 intramuscular injections of TroVax®, starting two weeks before chemotherapy and continuing at regular intervals during and after chemotherapy to 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the induction of cellular or humoral anti-5T4 immune response (defined as a doubling of either response at any of six follow-up time points), with a target response rate of 64%. Of 27 patients, enrolled between Feb 2013-Dec 2014, 23 (85%) received at least three doses of TroVax® and one cycle of chemotherapy and were included in the per-protocol analysis (PPA). 22/23 patients (95.6%) developed humoral or cellular immune response to 5T4. Thus, the study reached its primary endpoint. Disease control was observed in 87% of patients (partial response: 17.4%, stable disease: 69.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months and median overall survival 10.9 months. Treatment-related adverse events were comparable to those observed in patients with chemotherapy alone. Translational immunology studies revealed a circulating baseline immune signature that was significantly associated with long-term (>20 months in n = 8/23, 34.8%) survival. In this phase 2 trial, TroVax® with pemetrexed-cisplatin chemotherapy showed robust immune activity, acceptable safety and tolerability to warrant further investigation in a phase 3 setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela C Casbard
- Wales Cancer Trials Unit, Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Saly Al-Taei
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Lajos Katona
- Wales Cancer Trials Unit, Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Richard L Attanoos
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Zsuzsanna Tabi
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Gareth O Griffiths
- Wales Cancer Trials Unit, Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
|
4
|
Scherpereel A, Willemin MC, Wasielewski E, Dhalluin X. [Anti-tumor immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma]. Rev Mal Respir 2018; 35:465-476. [PMID: 29415822 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2017.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a quite rare cancer, but with increasing incidence, that is usually induced by previous asbestos exposure. Its prognosis is poor and there is no validated curative therapy to date. Surgery of MPM, done only by few expert teams within a multimodal treatment is of limited and still disputed value. The standard treatment of MPM, relying on first-line chemotherapy by combined cisplatin-pemetrexed is often poorly effective, even if combination with bevacizumab anti-VEGF antibodies has slightly improved the results. Moreover, no second line treatment is recommended in case of failure of this chemotherapy. Therefore, the search of new therapies or strategies is crucial and the recruitment of patients in clinical trials is highly encouraged. BACKGROUND Among the treatments under investigation, various anti-tumour immunotherapies, in particular immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI), currently exhibit the most promising preliminary results. First data from the phase II, randomized "IFCT MAPS-2", recently presented during the 2017 ASCO meeting, confirmed the value of ICI in MPM patients in cases of chemotherapy failure. OUTLOOK AND CONCLUSIONS However, several exciting immunotherapies other than ICI are presently being evaluated in MPM and are reported in this article. Moreover, many questions still need to be answered about immunotherapy: what is its potential value as first line treatment? How to target the best candidates for these treatments? Which combinations between immunotherapy and standard chemotherapy, targeted therapies, surgery or radiotherapy? Finally, it is now essential that every clinician has sufficient knowledge about the possible toxicities of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Scherpereel
- Pneumologie et oncologie thoracique, université Lille, Inserm U1019, CHU de Lille, CIIL, Institut Pasteur, 59000 Lille, France; MESOCLIN-réseau national des centres cliniques experts pour la prise en charge des mésothéliomes pleuraux malins, domiciliation du centre coordinateur national, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
| | - M-C Willemin
- Pneumologie et oncologie thoracique, université Lille, Inserm U1019, CHU de Lille, CIIL, Institut Pasteur, 59000 Lille, France; MESOCLIN-réseau national des centres cliniques experts pour la prise en charge des mésothéliomes pleuraux malins, domiciliation du centre coordinateur national, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - E Wasielewski
- Pneumologie et oncologie thoracique, université Lille, Inserm U1019, CHU de Lille, CIIL, Institut Pasteur, 59000 Lille, France; MESOCLIN-réseau national des centres cliniques experts pour la prise en charge des mésothéliomes pleuraux malins, domiciliation du centre coordinateur national, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - X Dhalluin
- Pneumologie et oncologie thoracique, université Lille, Inserm U1019, CHU de Lille, CIIL, Institut Pasteur, 59000 Lille, France; MESOCLIN-réseau national des centres cliniques experts pour la prise en charge des mésothéliomes pleuraux malins, domiciliation du centre coordinateur national, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aerts JGJV, de Goeje PL, Cornelissen R, Kaijen-Lambers MEH, Bezemer K, van der Leest CH, Mahaweni NM, Kunert A, Eskens FALM, Waasdorp C, Braakman E, van der Holt B, Vulto AG, Hendriks RW, Hegmans JPJJ, Hoogsteden HC. Autologous Dendritic Cells Pulsed with Allogeneic Tumor Cell Lysate in Mesothelioma: From Mouse to Human. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 24:766-776. [PMID: 29233904 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Mesothelioma has been regarded as a nonimmunogenic tumor, which is also shown by the low response rates to treatments targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Previously, we demonstrated that autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell (DC) immunotherapy increased T-cell response toward malignant mesothelioma. However, the use of autologous tumor material hampers implementation in large clinical trials, which might be overcome by using allogeneic tumor cell lines as tumor antigen source. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether allogeneic lysate-pulsed DC immunotherapy is effective in mice and safe in humans.Experimental Design: First, in two murine mesothelioma models, mice were treated with autologous DCs pulsed with either autologous or allogeneic tumor lysate or injected with PBS (negative control). Survival and tumor-directed T-cell responses of these mice were monitored. Results were taken forward in a first-in-human clinical trial, in which 9 patients were treated with 10, 25, or 50 million DCs per vaccination. DC vaccination consisted of autologous monocyte-derived DCs pulsed with tumor lysate from five mesothelioma cell lines.Results: In mice, allogeneic lysate-pulsed DC immunotherapy induced tumor-specific T cells and led to an increased survival, to a similar extent as DC immunotherapy with autologous tumor lysate. In the first-in-human clinical trial, no dose-limiting toxicities were established and radiographic responses were observed. Median PFS was 8.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.1-20.3] and median OS not reached (median follow-up = 22.8 months).Conclusions: DC immunotherapy with allogeneic tumor lysate is effective in mice and safe and feasible in humans. Clin Cancer Res; 24(4); 766-76. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Pauline L de Goeje
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robin Cornelissen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koen Bezemer
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cor H van der Leest
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niken M Mahaweni
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - André Kunert
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ferry A L M Eskens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cynthia Waasdorp
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Braakman
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bronno van der Holt
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rudi W Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost P J J Hegmans
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk C Hoogsteden
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Perrot M, Wu L, Wu M, Cho BCJ. Radiotherapy for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e532-e542. [PMID: 28884702 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30459-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive disease that continues to be associated with poor outcomes. Although, traditionally this disease is considered to be resistant to radiotherapy, more recent evidence suggests that radiotherapy can produce positive outcomes. Over the past 15 years, the development of new, highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), has enabled investigators to optimise the delivery of high-dose radiotherapy to the whole of the hemithorax. Prospective single-arm trials have shown that the median survival of patients who have completed high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy could reach 23·9-39·4 months independent of the chemotherapeutic response, suggesting that IMRT could potentially have an intrinsic benefit to this subset of patients. These observations have led to a change in practice, with the introduction of adjuvant pleural IMRT after pleurectomy-decortication and the development of induction-accelerated hemithoracic IMRT followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy. This Review focuses on recent observations on the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma, with particular emphasis on the results of clinical trials that evaluate the role of high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc de Perrot
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Licun Wu
- Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew Wu
- Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - B C John Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lievense LA, Sterman DH, Cornelissen R, Aerts JG. Checkpoint Blockade in Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196:274-282. [PMID: 28252315 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201608-1755ci] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, immunotherapy has emerged as a new treatment modality in cancer. The most success has been achieved with the class of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), antibodies that unleash the antitumor immune response. After the success in melanoma, numerous clinical trials are being conducted investigating CPIs in lung cancer and mesothelioma. The programmed death protein (PD) 1-PD ligand 1/2 pathway and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 are currently the most studied immunotherapeutic targets in these malignancies. In non-small cell lung cancer, anti-PD-1 antibodies have become part of the approved treatment arsenal. In small cell lung cancer and mesothelioma, the efficacy of checkpoint inhibition has not yet been proven. In this Concise Clinical Review, an overview of the landmark clinical trials investigating checkpoint blockade in lung cancer and mesothelioma is provided. Because response rates are around 20% in the majority of clinical trials, there is much room for improvement. Predictive biomarkers are therefore essential to fully develop the potential of CPIs. To increase efficacy, multiple clinical trials investigating the combination of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors and PD-1/PD ligand 1 blockade in lung cancer and mesothelioma are being conducted. Given the potential benefit of immunotherapy, implementation of current and new knowledge in trial designs and interpretation of results is essential for moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lysanne A Lievense
- 1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands; and
| | - Daniel H Sterman
- 3 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Robin Cornelissen
- 1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G Aerts
- 1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands; and
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Soo RA, Stone ECA, Cummings KM, Jett JR, Field JK, Groen HJM, Mulshine JL, Yatabe Y, Bubendorf L, Dacic S, Rami-Porta R, Detterbeck FC, Lim E, Asamura H, Donington J, Wakelee HA, Wu YL, Higgins K, Senan S, Solomon B, Kim DW, Johnson M, Yang JCH, Sequist LV, Shaw AT, Ahn MJ, Costa DB, Patel JD, Horn L, Gettinger S, Peters S, Wynes MW, Faivre-Finn C, Rudin CM, Tsao A, Baas P, Kelly RJ, Leighl NB, Scagliotti GV, Gandara DR, Hirsch FR, Spigel DR. Scientific Advances in Thoracic Oncology 2016. J Thorac Oncol 2017; 12:1183-1209. [PMID: 28579481 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer care is rapidly changing with advances in genomic testing, the development of next-generation targeted kinase inhibitors, and the continued broad study of immunotherapy in new settings and potential combinations. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Journal of Thoracic Oncology publish this annual update to help readers keep pace with these important developments. Experts in thoracic cancer and care provide focused updates across multiple areas, including prevention and early detection, molecular diagnostics, pathology and staging, surgery, adjuvant therapy, radiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy for NSCLC, SCLC, and mesothelioma. Quality and value of care and perspectives on the future of lung cancer research and treatment have also been included in this concise review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross A Soo
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute of Singapore, Singapore; School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Emily C A Stone
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - K Michael Cummings
- Hollings Cancer Center Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | - John K Field
- Roy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Harry J M Groen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - James L Mulshine
- Internal Medicine, Graduate College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Yasushi Yatabe
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sanja Dacic
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ramon Rami-Porta
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Network of Biomedical Research Centers in Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES) Lung Cancer Group, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Eric Lim
- Academic Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hisao Asamura
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jessica Donington
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Heather A Wakelee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Yi-Long Wu
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Kristin Higgins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Solomon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dong-Wan Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - James C H Yang
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Republic of China
| | - Lecia V Sequist
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alice T Shaw
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Section of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Daniel B Costa
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jyoti D Patel
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Leora Horn
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Scott Gettinger
- Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Solange Peters
- Medical Oncology and Thoracic Malignancies, Oncology Department, University Hospital Center Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Murry W Wynes
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Radiotherapy Related Research, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Charles M Rudin
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne Tsao
- Mesothelioma Program, Thoracic Chemo-Radiation Program, Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Chest Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronan J Kelly
- Deptartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Natasha B Leighl
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - David R Gandara
- Thoracic Oncology Program, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bakker E, Guazzelli A, Ashtiani F, Demonacos C, Krstic-Demonacos M, Mutti L. Immunotherapy advances for mesothelioma treatment. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:799-814. [PMID: 28724330 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1358091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mesothelioma is a rare type of cancer that is strongly tied to asbestos exposure. Despite application of different modalities such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, patient prognosis remains very poor and therapies are ineffective. Much research currently focuses on the application of novel approaches such as immunotherapy towards this disease. Areas covered: The types, stages and aetiology of mesothelioma are detailed, followed by a discussion of the current treatment options such as radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy. A description of innate and adaptive immunity and the principles and justification of immunotherapy is also included. Clinical trials for different immunotherapeutic modalities are described, and lastly the article closes with an expert commentary and five-year view, the former of which is summarised below. Expert commentary: Current efforts for novel mesothelioma therapies have been limited by attempting to apply treatments from other cancers, an approach which is not based on a solid understanding of mesothelioma biology. In our view, the influence of the hostile, hypoxic microenvironment and the gene expression and metabolic changes that resultantly occur should be characterised to improve therapies. Lastly, clinical trials should focus on overall survival rather than surrogate endpoints to avoid bias and inaccurate reflections of treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emyr Bakker
- a Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences , University of Salford , Salford , UK
| | - Alice Guazzelli
- a Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences , University of Salford , Salford , UK
| | - Firozeh Ashtiani
- a Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences , University of Salford , Salford , UK
| | - Constantinos Demonacos
- b Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Division of Pharmacy & Optometry , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK
| | - Marija Krstic-Demonacos
- a Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences , University of Salford , Salford , UK
| | - Luciano Mutti
- a Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences , University of Salford , Salford , UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma is a universally lethal cancer that is increasing in incidence worldwide. There is a dearth of effective therapies, with only one treatment (pemetrexed and cisplatin combination chemotherapy) approved in the past 13 years. However, the past 5 years have witnessed an exponential growth in our understanding of mesothelioma pathobiology, which is set to revolutionize therapeutic strategies. From a genomic standpoint, mesothelioma is characterized by a preponderance of tumour suppressor alterations, for which novel therapies are currently in development. Other promising antitumour agents include inhibitors against angiogenesis, mesothelin and immune checkpoints, which are at various phases of clinical trial testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy A Yap
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Joachim G Aerts
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanjay Popat
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London SW3 6NP, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guazzelli A, Bakker E, Krstic-Demonacos M, Lisanti MP, Sotgia F, Mutti L. Anti-CTLA-4 therapy for malignant mesothelioma. Immunotherapy 2017; 9:273-280. [PMID: 28231719 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2016-0123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy is an emerging therapeutic strategy with a promising clinical outcome in some solid tumors, particularly metastatic melanoma. One approach to immunotherapy is immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as blockage of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1. This special report aims to describe the state of clinical trials of tremelimumab in patients with unresectable malignant mesothelioma (MM) in particular with regard to the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability. Criticism and perspective of this treatment are also discussed. Biological and clinical considerations rule out the use of tremelimumab as single agent for MM and, more generally, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for MM is still largely questionable and not supported by evidences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Guazzelli
- Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Emyr Bakker
- Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Marija Krstic-Demonacos
- Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Michael P Lisanti
- Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Federica Sotgia
- Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Luciano Mutti
- Biomedical Research Centre, School of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Thapa B, Salcedo A, Lin X, Walkiewicz M, Murone C, Ameratunga M, Asadi K, Deb S, Barnett SA, Knight S, Mitchell P, Watkins DN, Boutros PC, John T. The Immune Microenvironment, Genome-wide Copy Number Aberrations, and Survival in Mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol 2017; 12:850-859. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2016] [Revised: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 02/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
14
|
Scherpereel A. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: new treatments, new hopes? Eur Respir J 2017; 49:49/3/1700319. [PMID: 28298408 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00319-2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Scherpereel
- Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France .,French National network of clinical expert centres for malignant pleural mesothelioma management (MESOCLIN)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Laurie SA, Hao D, Leighl NB, Goffin J, Khomani A, Gupta A, Addison CL, Bane A, Seely J, Filion ML, Pond GR, Levine MN. A phase II trial of dovitinib in previously-treated advanced pleural mesothelioma: The Ontario Clinical Oncology Group. Lung Cancer 2016; 104:65-69. [PMID: 28213002 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Revised: 12/04/2016] [Accepted: 12/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Following failure of a platinum-antifolate combination regimen, there is no standard therapy for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling pathways may be a relevant target in MPM. Dovitinib inhibits multiple tyrosine receptor kinases, predominantly the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR), but also FGFRs, and could be active in MPM. METHODS This open-label multicentre phase II trial [NCT01769547] enrolled fit, consenting adult patients with advanced MPM who had previously received platinum-antifolate combination chemotherapy and up to one additional line of systemic therapy. Dovitinib was administered orally at 500mg/day for 5days on, 2days off, in 28-day cycles. Response was assessed every 2 cycles using RECIST 1.1 criteria modified for MPM. Correlative studies included FGFR-1 amplification on archival tumour and serum samples for circulating angiogenesis factors. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients progression-free at 3 months (PF3) using a two-stage design. RESULTS 12 patients (10 males, median age 67) were enrolled. The median number of cycles administered was 2.5 (range 1-8). One unconfirmed partial response was observed. PF3 was 50% (95% confidence interval 28.4% to 88.0%); although the criterion for proceeding to stage II accrual was met, the trial was halted due to a combination of minimal activity with several early progression events and poor tolerability in this patient population. One of 12 tumour specimens had low amplification of FGFR-1. CONCLUSIONS Dovitinib has minimal activity in previously-treated MPM. The role of the FGFR pathway in MPM remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott A Laurie
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Desiree Hao
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - John Goffin
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Abderrahim Khomani
- The Cancer Centre of NorthEastern Ontario, 41 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
| | - Ashish Gupta
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Anita Bane
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine and Department of Oncology, McMaster University, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Jean Seely
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Marc L Filion
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Gregory R Pond
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Mark N Levine
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Menon S, Shin S, Dy G. Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2016; 8:E106. [PMID: 27886124 PMCID: PMC5187504 DOI: 10.3390/cancers8120106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Revised: 11/13/2016] [Accepted: 11/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy is heralded as one of the most important advances in oncology. Until recently, only limited immunotherapeutic options were available in selected immunogenic cancers like melanoma and renal cell carcinomas. Nowadays, there is an improved understanding that anti-tumor immunity is controlled by a delicate balance in the tumor microenvironment between immune stimulatory and immune inhibitory pathways. Either by blocking the inhibitory pathways or stimulating the activating pathways that regulate cytotoxic lymphocytes, anti-tumor immunity can be enhanced leading to durable anti-tumor responses. Drugs which block the immune regulatory checkpoints namely the PD-1/PDL1 and CTLA 4 pathway have shown tremendous promise in a wide spectrum of solid and hematological malignancies, significantly improving overall survival in newly diagnosed and heavily pretreated patients alike. Hence there is renewed enthusiasm in the field of immune oncology with current research focused on augmenting responses to checkpoint inhibitors by combination therapy as well as studies looking at other immune modulators and adoptive T cell therapy. In this article, we highlight the key clinical advances and concepts in immunotherapy with particular emphasis on checkpoint inhibition as well as the future direction in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smitha Menon
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
| | - Sarah Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14228, USA.
| | - Grace Dy
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thapa B, Watkins DN, John T. Immunotherapy for malignant mesothelioma: reality check. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016; 16:1167-1176. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1241149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|