1
|
Bersanelli M, Buti S, Rizzo M. The need for new algorithms of treatment sequencing in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 21:401-412. [PMID: 33287612 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1861941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, the systemic treatment of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone profound innovations, offering the availability of new drugs, and raising the bar of the survival expectation in this, previously, almost-always, incurable disease. The likeliness of reaching durable response and long-term survival is still closely linked to good clinical management and smart treatment sequencing, rather than to a single systemic treatment choice.Areas covered: We review all systemic therapeutic options currently available, describe the evidence behind the current options available for mRCC patient treatment, and provide our personal cues to support clinical decisions.Expert opinion: The IMDC classification is still the only widely validated tool for the choice of primary therapy. Other elements should then be considered for selecting patients who can still receive TKI monotherapy (good-risk patients) or who deserve an 'all-at-once' approach with TKI plus ICI (poor-risk patients with the high metastatic burden and poor-prognosis organ involvement, likely not able to achieve a second chance), identifying these two 'extreme' situations and setting all the other treatment choices on the basis of several nuances. In the second- and further-line settings, ad-hoc prospective trials are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Bersanelli
- Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Mimma Rizzo
- Traslational Oncology, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zahoor H, Duddalwar V, D’Souza A, Merseburger AS, Quinn DI. What Comes After Immuno-Oncology Therapy for Kidney Cancer? KIDNEY CANCER 2019. [DOI: 10.3233/kca-190053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Haris Zahoor
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vinay Duddalwar
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anishka D’Souza
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Axel S. Merseburger
- Department of Urology, Campus Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - David I. Quinn
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gao X, McDermott DF. Ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2018; 18:947-957. [PMID: 30124333 PMCID: PMC6289271 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1513485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a highly immunogenic neoplasm, and cytokine-based immunotherapies have been used for decades with limited success. In recent years, antibody-based immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoint receptors PD-1 and CTLA-4 have demonstrated clinical efficacy in metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients, leading to FDA approval of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with intermediate- or poor-risk disease in April 2018. Areas covered: The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of nivolumab and ipilimumab are reviewed. Clinical safety and efficacy results from pivotal phase I and III trials of the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in mRCC are summarized, and the combination is reviewed in the context of other available systemic therapies for RCC. Ongoing clinical studies involving the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in RCC are discussed. Expert opinion: The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab has demonstrated superior efficacy for treatment-naïve patients with intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC with clear cell histology and is likely to replace anti-angiogenic therapies as the treatment-of-choice in this patient population in the United States. Development of additional combination strategies, novel trial designs, and predictive biomarkers of response will be important to further optimize therapeutic selection and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Gao
- a Department of Medicine , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , MA , USA
| | - David F McDermott
- b Biologic Therapy and Cutaneous Oncology Programs , Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston , MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu J, Armstrong AJ, Friedlander TW, Kim W, Pal SK, George DJ, Zhang T. Biomarkers of immunotherapy in urothelial and renal cell carcinoma: PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, and beyond. J Immunother Cancer 2018; 6:4. [PMID: 29368638 PMCID: PMC5784676 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0314-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1 pathway have greatly changed clinical management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, response rates are low, and biomarkers are needed to predict for treatment response. Immunohistochemical quantification of PD-L1 was developed as a promising biomarker in early clinical trials, but many shortcomings of the four different assays (different antibodies, disparate cellular populations, and different thresholds of positivity) have limited its clinical utility. Further limitations include the use of archival specimens to measure this dynamic biomarker. Indeed, until PD-L1 testing is standardized and can consistently predict treatment outcome, the currently available PD-L1 assays are not clinically useful in urothelial and renal cell carcinoma. Other more promising biomarkers include tumor mutational burden, profiles of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, molecular subtypes, and PD-L2. Potentially, a composite biomarker may be best but will need prospective testing to validate such a biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Zhu
- Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Won Kim
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Tian Zhang
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC 103861, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barata PC, Rini BI. Treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Current status and future directions. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67:507-524. [PMID: 28961310 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 532] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Over the past 12 years, medical treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has transitioned from a nonspecific immune approach (in the cytokine era), to targeted therapy against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and now to novel immunotherapy agents. Multiple agents-including molecules against vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and related receptors; inhibitors of other targets, such as the mammalian target of rapamycin and the MET and AXL tyrosine-protein kinase receptors; and an immune-checkpoint inhibitor-have been approved based on significant activity in patients with advanced RCC. Despite these advances, important questions remain regarding biomarkers of efficacy, patient selection, and the optimal combination and sequencing of agents. The purpose of this review is to summarize present management and future directions in the treatment of metastatic RCC. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:507-524. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro C Barata
- Experimental Therapeutics Fellow, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Brian I Rini
- Professor of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine; and Leader, Genitourinary Program, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Choueiri TK, Halabi S, Morris MJ, George D. Reply to B. Rini et al and S. Buti et al. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1859-1860. [PMID: 28549224 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.72.2629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Toni K Choueiri
- Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Susan Halabi, Duke University, Durham, NC; Michael J. Morris, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Daniel George, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Susan Halabi
- Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Susan Halabi, Duke University, Durham, NC; Michael J. Morris, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Daniel George, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Michael J Morris
- Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Susan Halabi, Duke University, Durham, NC; Michael J. Morris, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Daniel George, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel George
- Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Susan Halabi, Duke University, Durham, NC; Michael J. Morris, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Daniel George, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|