Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Who Discontinued Treatment With Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Because of Adverse Events: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Phase II and III Trials

Association of anti-PD-(L)1 treatment duration to efficacy in advanced solid tumors: a single center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a standard of care in multiple cancers. Only a minority benefits, thus, optimal use and treatment duration remain indistinct. While biomarkers albeit PD-L1 are scarce, declined performance status and cancer-related systemic inflammation detected by blood inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) have been linked to inferior prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the association of limited anti-PD-(L)1 treatment duration to therapy efficacy in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received therapy in a non-curative setting in Oulu University Hospital 2014-2022. Baseline prognostic factors (e.g. ECOG, CRP, and PD-L1 for NSCLC) were collected. Progression-free (PFS), overall (OS), and IO-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

126 patients (NSCLC, n = 72; melanoma, n = 54) were included. Majority (n = 101) were treated in the first line. Objective response rate was 34.9%. The median (m) anti-PD-(L)1 treatment duration was 3.42 months (mo). The mPFS and mOS were 6.8 mo (CI 95% 4.4-9.3) and 19.1 mo (CI 95% 13.3-24.9). Of the baseline factors, ECOG and CRP retained their significance in multivariate analysis for PFS (HR 0.34, CI 95% 0.19-0.59; HR 0.34, CI 95% 0.22-054) and OS (HR 0.38, CI 95% 0.20-0.71; HR 0.29, CI 95% 0.17-0.49). No difference was observed in PFS (HR 1.40, CI 95% 0.68-2.90) or OS (HR 0.69, CI 95% 0.29-1.65) according to treatment duration (3-6mo vs. > 6 mo). Long median IO-free survival (10.2 months; CI 95%, 4.1-16.3) was detected.

CONCLUSION

We characterized an anti-PD-(L)1 treated advanced NSCLC and melanoma cohort in which treatment benefit occurs irrespective of treatment duration and long-term benefit is observed off-treatment.

Rechallenge with immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced-stage lung cancer

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with many patients diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. Treatment in this setting relies on systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which promote or restore antitumour immunity by inhibiting immunosuppressive signalling pathways, are currently the most widely used immunotherapies in these patients. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or disease progression often necessitate discontinuation of these agents, leaving many patients with limited subsequent treatment options. In this scenario, ICI rechallenge has emerged as a potential strategy. Despite this potential, evidence for ICI rechallenge after either disease progression or irAEs in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer is limited and evidence for those with small cell lung cancer seems to be non-existent. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the available data on ICI rechallenge in the context of both disease progression and irAEs, including a summary of current guidance on clinical management and detailed discussions of safety and efficacy. We also highlight important unanswered questions in an attempt to guide future research in this area.

Nivolumab plus relatlimab in advanced melanoma: RELATIVITY-047 4-year update

BACKGROUND

In phase 2/3 randomized RELATIVITY-047, nivolumab plus relatlimab demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), a clinically meaningful but not statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS), and a numerically higher objective response rate (ORR) versus nivolumab alone in patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma.

METHODS

Descriptive 4-year updated analyses in patients treated with nivolumab 480 mg plus relatlimab 160 mg fixed-dose combination versus nivolumab 480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks are presented. Primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). Other endpoints included melanoma-specific survival (MSS).

RESULTS

At 45.3 months' minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus relatlimab versus nivolumab PFS improvement was maintained: 4-year PFS rates were 30.6 % (95 % CI, 25.4-35.9) versus 23.6 % (95 % CI, 18.9-28.5); OS was numerically better with 4-year OS rates of 52.0 % (95 % CI, 46.6-57.1) versus 42.8 % (95 % CI, 37.5-47.9); and ORR difference was maintained at 43.9 % (95 % CI, 38.7-49.3) versus 33.4 % (95 % CI, 28.6-38.6), respectively. 4-year MSS rates were 59.7 % (95 % CI, 54.1-64.8) for nivolumab plus relatlimab and 49.6 % (95 % CI, 44.0-54.9) for nivolumab. Efficacy across the majority of prespecified subgroups favored the combination. No new or unexpected safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

With 4 years of follow-up, nivolumab plus relatlimab demonstrated durable improvement in outcomes versus nivolumab monotherapy for patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma. The durable benefit observed comes at a lower toxicity cost compared with other immuno-oncology combinations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03470922.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: From friend to foe

Immune checkpoints are crucial in regulating the activation of cell-mediated and humoral immune responses. However, cancer cells hijack this mechanism to evade the immune surveillance and anti-cancer response. Typically, receptors like PD-1 and CTLA4, expressed on immune cells, prevent the activation and differentiation of T cells. They also inhibit the development of autoimmune reactions. However, ligands such as PD-L1 for the receptor PD-1 are also expressed on the surface of cancer cells that help prevent the activation of anti-cancer immune responses by blocking the signalling pathways mediated by PD-1 and CTLA4. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have promising therapeutic efficacy for treating several cancers by activating T cells and their differentiation into effector cells against tumours. Nonetheless, hyperactivated immune cells usually contribute to detrimental issues, also known as immune-related adverse effects (IrAE). IrAEs have been observed in multiple organs, leading to neurological issues, colitis, endocrine dysfunction, renal issues, hepatitis, pneumonitis, and dermatitis. The interplay between hyperactivated T cells and Treg cells helps in orchestrating the development of autoimmunity. Moreover, the crosstalk between proinflammatory interleukins and the development of autoantibodies also mediates the multiorgan effects of ICIs in cancer patients. IrAEs are generally managed by terminating the ICI therapy, reducing the ICI dose, and by using corticosteroids to subvert inflammation. Therefore, the present review aims to delineate the impacts of ICIs on the development of autoimmune diseases and inflammatory outcomes in cancer patients. In addition, mechanistic insight involving immune cells, cytokines, and autoantibodies for ICI-mediated IrAEs will also be discussed with updated findings in this field.

From ICI to ICU: A systematic review of patients with solid tumors who are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the survival of patients with different solid tumors and even resulted in cure of metastatic disease. Since the introduction of ICIs, an increasing number of patients is admitted to the ICU for severe and potentially life-threatening immune related adverse events (irAEs). The outcome of patients who are admitted to the ICU because of severe irAEs is still unknown. The aim of this systematic review is to collect evidence on the outcomes of patients with solid tumors who are admitted to the ICU because of irAEs.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and Google Scholar were searched systematically from 1975 to 24 September 2024. Articles were only included when describing patients with solid tumors who were admitted to the ICU because of irAEs after treatment with ICIs. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 183 articles were included: two prospective ICU population-based studies, four retrospective ICU population-based studies, 25 retrospective studies describing irAEs with incidental ICU admissions, one review of case reports, and 153 articles with a total of 177 case reports. The six ICU population-based studies contained a total of 169 patients who were admitted to the ICU due to irAEs. In these six studies, the most frequently reported irAEs were pneumonitis and neurological irAEs. Of these 169 patients, 26% of the patients died on the ICU and an additional 8% of patients in the three to six months thereafter due to irAEs or disease progression. In all 183 included articles, various irAEs were described and the reported mortality rate varied from 0 to 53%.

CONCLUSION

The potential favorable outcomes of both the solid tumors and irAEs will probably result in more need for ICU admissions. Prospective clinical trials are needed to optimize the treatment strategy of severe irAEs at the ICU. Based on the favourable outcomes after life-threatening irAEs, ICU admission should definitely be considered for patients with solid tumors who have life-threatening irAEs.

Immunotherapy in Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma: From the Optimal Treatment Duration to the Impact on Survival in Case of Early Discontinuation Due to Immune-Related Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the prognosis of patients with cutaneous melanoma. Immunotherapy (IT) is generally well tolerated, but an increasing area of investigation concerns the optimal treatment duration of anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD1) regimens to limit the immune-related adverse events in patients who obtained a clinical response. Another point of interest is the impact of the early discontinuation of ICIs on the maintenance of response in terms of survival in patients developing grade 3-4 adverse events that mostly occur in those receiving the combo-IT. Currently, we are still far from having final conclusions on these topics and, thus, the present review aims to describe the recent data about the optimal treatment duration and the maintenance of response in the case of early discontinuation. In this context, we include data on the real life of patients from our Medical Oncology Center who discontinued anti-PD1 after at least a stable disease or those interrupting the combo-IT due to adverse events.

The impact of the time-of-day in the administration of immunotherapy and its efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Certain publications suggest that immunotherapy would be more effective if it were synchronised with the circadian oscillations of the immune system. We hypothesised that late treatment delivery in melanoma patients would correlate with worse survival outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a monocentric retrospective study in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line therapy. We used the median clock time of all infusions (11:00) as the cut-off point to differentiate morning from afternoon. Patients were allocated to the morning or afternoon group depending on whether they had received >50% of their infusions before or after 11:00. A propensity score was calculated. Timing groups were assessed for association with overall and progression-free survival using a Cox proportional hazards model, survival curves were compared, and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were analysed.

RESULTS

We included 154 patients treated with frontline immunotherapy in a metastatic setting from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2022, with a median age of 67 years (interquartile range: 56-75). Late treatment delivery was associated neither with worse overall survival (median not reached [34.9-not estimable] vs. 70.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.94 [0.63-1.39]) nor worse progression-free survival (22.3 vs. 26.5; HR = 0.99 [0.71-1.38]), and there were no differences in survival outcomes between the groups. Severe treatment-related AEs were significantly more frequent in the afternoon group than in the morning group (33 [34%] vs. 6 [11%] respectively, weighted p-value = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Timing was not associated with worse efficacy outcomes, but morning administration appears to improve safety.

Fixed-Dose Versus Weight-Adapted Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma: A Retrospective Monocentric Analysis of Efficacy and Immune-Related Adverse Events

Changes in the dosing schedules for immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically nivolumab and pembrolizumab, in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, were introduced based on pharmacokinetic data and analysis of pre-existing clinical trial data in the absence of new clinical trials. Therefore, we sought to provide real-world data examining whether fixed-dose therapy (FDT) or weight-adapted therapy (WAT) influenced progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The electronic case notes of all patients (n = 77) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (ICI) in the first-line setting for melanoma in the Department of Dermatology, University of Luebeck, between the 1 January 2017 and the 31 December 2020, were retrospectively analysed. Although a higher proportion of patients in the WAT cohort were treated in the palliative setting, there were no correlations between dosing schedule, renal function, or BMI and PFS. Moreover, there were no differences between the cohorts in terms of PFS, OS, or the number and nature of irAEs. An elevated serum S100 concentration was associated with a decreased mean PFS in the FDT cohort (p < 0.001). This study, although inherently limited by its retrospective and monocentric nature, provides reassuring evidence that dosing schedule and pre-existing comorbidities do not influence efficacy or the irAE profile of ICI therapy in the management of melanoma.

Early termination does not negatively impact the outcome of adjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant treatment with anti-PD1 antibodies has been shown to effectively reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with resected metastatic melanoma. Whether a full 12-month duration of treatment is needed to achieve full clinical benefit is not known. This study investigated the survival outcome depending on the duration of adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy.

METHODS

From the prospective multicentre real-world skin cancer registry ADOREG data of 620 patients who finished adjuvant treatment with nivolumab or pembrolizumab for AJCCv8 stage III/IV resected melanoma was analyzed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with regular treatment duration (52 ± 4 weeks; n = 229) and no disease recurrence during therapy (A1) and patients with a premature end of treatment (<48 weeks; n = 214, B). Patients with disease recurrence during adjuvant treatment were included in cohort A2.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up was 26.0 months [interquartile range (IQR) 18.0-34.0] in group A1 [median treatment duration 51.3 weeks (IQR 50.0-52.1) and 19.0 months (IQR 13.0-29.0)] in group B [median treatment duration 22.2 weeks (IQR 10.0-34.8)]. Reasons for early discontinuation were treatment-related side effects in 45.3% (n = 97) and other reasons than toxicity in 54.7% (n = 117). The 2-year rate of RFS was 72.4% (95% CI, 68.5-76.3) for patients in group B and 51.5% (95% CI, 48.8-54.2) in patients with regular and intended regular treatment duration (A1 plus A2). When analysing the patients who did not relapse during adjuvant treatment (A1), there was a significantly higher RFS rate of 84.1% (95% CI, 81.5-86.7). When only assessing patients with a recurrence after more than 12 months after initiation of therapy, there was a trend towards better RFS in patients with regular treatment duration.

CONCLUSION

In patients with resected metastatic melanoma, shorter treatment duration with anti-PD1 antibodies is not associated with a worse outcome.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced pancreatitis: a systematic review and real-world pharmacovigilance analysis

Purpose

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced pancreatitis (ICIs-P) is an uncommon immune-related adverse event. The available evidence consists mostly of case reports, case series, and narrative reviews. This research focuses on the clinical characteristics and management options for ICIs-P to provide a practice-based global perspective on this disease.

Methods

Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed to identify the relevant studies. Furthermore, we performed a disproportionality analysis utilizing OpenVigil 2.1 to interrogate the United States Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Results

A total of 61 patients from 58 studies were included in this study. Most patients with ICIs-P were males (60.7%). Most patients received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy (78.7%) or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in conjunction with CTLA-4 blockade (19.7%). The median time from the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment to pancreatitis was 108 days (range 52-278). Most cases were severe or life-threatening (G3-G4; 64.0%). Corticosteroids were administered to 73.8% of the patients during the treatment of pancreatitis. Regarding treatment outcomes, ICIs-P was reversible in most cases (83.6%), despite the 8.2% relapse and 8.2% deaths. We identified 606 reports of pancreatitis associated with ICIs in the FAERS database, with the greatest proportion of males (50.7%), 62.0% of PD-1 inhibitors, and 22.1% of all reports of death or life-threatening outcomes. Signals indicating pancreatitis were observed across all ICIs, with particular emphasis on Cemiplimab, Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab.

Conclusion

By using a pharmacovigilance database, we discovered an elevated risk of pancreatitis following ICIs therapy, especially with PD-1 inhibitors. Meanwhile, risk factors for ICIs-P remain poorly understood, and diagnosis is challenging. Which may manifest as asymptomatic elevated pancreatic enzyme levels or clinical pancreatitis. Patients with pancreatitis symptoms should have their lipase and amylase levels and radiology evaluated. Diagnosis should be made by excluding other causes. Steroids are the cornerstone of ICIs-P treatment and slow dose reduction is recommended to reduce recurrence.

Machine learning identifies clinical tumor mutation landscape pathways of resistance to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy for several tumor indications. However, a substantial fraction of patients treated with CPIs derive no benefit or have short-lived responses to CPI therapy. Identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from CPIs and deciphering resistance mechanisms is therefore essential for developing adjunct treatments that can abrogate tumor resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, we used a machine learning approach that used the US-based nationwide de-identified Flatiron Health and Foundation Medicine non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) clinico-genomic database to identify genomic markers that predict clinical responses to CPI therapy. In total, we analyzed data from 4,433 patients with NSCLC.

RESULTS

Analysis of pretreatment genomic data from 1,511 patients with NSCLC identified. Of the 36 genomic signatures identified, 33 exhibited strong predictive capacity for CPI response (n=1150) compared with chemotherapy response (n=361), while three signatures were prognostic. These 36 genetic signatures had in common a core set of four genes (BRAF, BRIP1, FGF10, and FLT1). Interestingly, we observed that some (n=19) of the genes in the signatures (eg, TP53, EZH2, KEAP1 and FGFR2) had alternative mutations with contrasting clinical outcomes to CPI therapy. Finally, the genetic signatures revealed multiple biological pathways involved in CPI response, including MAPK, PDGF, IL-6 and EGFR signaling.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we found several genomic markers and pathways that provide insight into biological mechanisms affecting response to CPI therapy. The analyses identified novel targets and biomarkers that have the potential to provide candidates for combination therapies or patient enrichment strategies, which could increase response rates to CPI therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Personalization of Cancer Treatment: Exploring the Role of Chronotherapy in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy

In the era of precision medicine, mounting evidence suggests that the time of therapy administration, or chronotherapy, has a great impact on treatment outcomes. Chronotherapy involves planning treatment timing by considering circadian rhythms, which are 24 h oscillations in behavior and physiology driven by synchronized molecular clocks throughout the body. The value of chronotherapy in cancer treatment is currently under investigation, notably in the effects of treatment timing on efficacy and side effects. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is a promising cancer treatment. However, many patients still experience disease progression or need to stop the therapy early due to side effects. There is accumulating evidence that the time of day at which ICI therapy is administered can have a substantial effect on ICI efficacy. Thus, it is important to investigate the intersections of circadian rhythms, chronotherapy, and ICI efficacy. In this review, we provide a brief overview of circadian rhythms in the context of immunity and cancer. Additionally, we outline current applications of chronotherapy for cancer treatment. We synthesize the 29 studies conducted to date that examine the impact of time-of-day administration on the efficacy of ICI therapy, its associated side effects, and sex differences in both efficacy and side effects. We also discuss potential mechanisms underlying these observed results. Finally, we highlight the challenges in this area and future directions for research, including the potential for a chronotherapeutic personalized medicine approach that tailors the time of ICI administration to individual patients' circadian rhythms.

Early treatment discontinuation in patients with deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability high metastatic colorectal cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended to treat patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability high (dMMR/MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Pivotal trials have fixed a maximum ICI duration of 2 years, without a compelling rationale. A shorter treatment duration has the potential to improve patients' quality of life and reduce both toxicity and cost without compromising efficacy. Here we examine whether early treatment discontinuation (ETD) before 13 months in patients without progressive disease (PD) can lead to similar long-term disease control compared with a longer treatment duration (LTD).

METHODS

To assess whether ETD is associated with similar outcomes compared with LTD, we assembled an international cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with ICIs who stopped treatment for a reason other than PD within 395 days (ETD group) and compared them to those who continued for >395 days (LTD group). Outcomes were adjusted for patient/tumor characteristics. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Of 976 patients, 137 and 394 were allocated to the ETD and LTD groups, respectively. In the ETD group, treatment was discontinued due to toxicity (n=56), objective response (n=43), surgery (n=28), patient decision (n=2) or other reasons (n=8). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups: 22% in both groups received both anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) + anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4); all others received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. ORR to ICIs was 81% in both groups. Median duration of treatment was ~7 months in the ETD and ~24 months in the LTD group. After a median follow-up of 44 months (IQR: 30-67), similar PFS (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.40, p=0.69) and OS (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.99, p=0.62) from the start of ICIs were observed in ETD and LTD patients. In the ETD group, 28 (20%) patients had a PFS event and 9 restarted ICIs with a disease control rate of 66%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our international series of dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, ETD of ICIs in the absence of PD did not seem detrimental in terms of PFS and OS compared with continuing treatment beyond 1 year. Randomized clinical trials to compare short and long treatment duration are now warranted.

Optimal Duration of Consolidation Durvalumab Following Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Although durvalumab has shown promise in improving survival rates in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the ideal duration of treatment has yet to be established.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to determine the optimal number of durvalumab cycles following definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 178 patients who received chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC at 15 institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to the number of consolidation durvalumab cycles by landmark analysis. Landmark analyses were performed at 3-month intervals from the start of durvalumab treatment to 9 months.

RESULTS

The median number of durvalumab cycles was 16 (range 1-27). PFS and OS were significantly better in patients who received ≥20 cycles of durvalumab than in those who did not (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In landmark analysis, significant differences were observed in PFS from 0 to 6 months and OS from 3 to 6 months between patients who continued durvalumab after the time point and those who did not. However, there were no significant differences in PFS or OS between patients who received 13-19 or ≥20 cycles of durvalumab at 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab should be administered for more than 6 months to contribute to the main benefits of consolidation therapy following chemoradiotherapy.

When to stop immunotherapy for advanced melanoma: the emulated target trials

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated their efficacy with a 7.5-year overall survival (OS) close to 50% for advanced stages. The design of clinical trials provides for treatment until progression or toxicity, or for a maximum duration of two years. Prolonged follow-up of responders after treatment cessation shows sustained response and a low risk of relapse in the months following cessation. To date, the optimal duration of anti-PD-1 therapy for metastatic melanoma remains unestablished. The objective of this work was to evaluate the optimal duration of ICI administration.

Methods

We emulated target trials using the cloning, weighting and censoring approach. Each emulation trial aimed to compare the effect of discontinuing versus continuing ICIs at a specific timepoint, among patients still under treatment and with disease control at that time. Patients were from MelBase between 2015 and 2021.

Findings

435 participants in the MelBase cohort were eligible and were included in the 6-month discontinuation emulated trial. The results showed significantly lower OS when treatment was discontinued, than when treatment was prolonged for at least three months. The 48-month survival difference was 37.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.8-60.5), and the corresponding restricted mean survival time difference was 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.1-12.7). Neither the 12-month nor the 18-month discontinuation emulated trials showed evidence of benefit of either discontinuing or continuing ICIs at either of these timepoints. The 24-month discontinuation emulated trial results were more in favor of discontinuing than continuing treatment at that time point, with an absolute 48-month survival rate that was 10.5% higher (95% CI 4.4-18.1).

Interpretation

These results suggest that a one-year course of immunotherapy is both necessary and sufficient for patients with advanced melanoma. Prolonged treatment beyond 2 years does not appear to be beneficial in terms of survival and could even be detrimental.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp Dhome, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Sun Pharm, Regeneron, Sanofi, Nektar, Therapeutics and Oncyte.

Correlation of safety and efficacy of atezolizumab therapy across indications

BACKGROUND

The association between safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is known, but the correlation between severity and impact of specific organ involvement by immune-related adverse events (irAE) and cancer outcomes is poorly understood. Most irAEs are mild-to-moderate but severe irAEs may pose clinical management challenges and affect patient outcomes.

METHODS

We assessed the association between irAE grade (G) and specific organ involvement with overall survival (OS) in 9,521 patients across 14 studies involving atezolizumab as mono (IO) or with chemo/targeted (C-IO) therapy as compared with chemo/targeted therapy (C) in advanced non-small cell lung, small-cell lung, renal cell, urothelial, and triple-negative breast cancers. We used a mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model for time-varying covariates to address immortal-time bias; adjusted for baseline factors associated with irAEs and OS to control for confounding bias; and focused on five common irAEs (dermatologic, thyroid dysfunction, hepatitis, pneumonitis, and colitis) to avoid low statistical power for rare events.

RESULTS

For patients treated with IO or C-IO, G1-2 irAEs were associated with improved OS (HR=0.65, p<0.01) and G3-4 irAEs showed a slight increased risk of death (HR=1.18, p=0.10) versus patients without irAEs. By specific irAE, G1-2 cutaneous irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, or pneumonitis were associated with improved OS (p<0.05), while G3-4 pneumonitis and colitis were associated with worse OS (p<0.01). There was no association between hepatitis and OS by any grade. Findings were consistent across indications.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates a correlation between irAEs and improved OS with atezolizumab by severity grade and the most common irAEs by organ involvement. Low-grade irAEs are significantly associated with improved OS, while specific high-grade irAEs are associated with poorer OS, underscoring the importance of early recognition and management of toxicity to optimize benefit/risk balance.

TMED inhibition suppresses cell surface PD-1 expression and overcomes T cell dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Blockade of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint (ICB) is revolutionizing cancer therapy, but little is known about the mechanisms governing its expression on CD8 T cells. Because PD-1 is induced during activation of T cells, we set out to uncover regulators whose inhibition suppresses PD-1 abundance without adversely impacting on T cell activation.

METHODS

To identify PD-1 regulators in an unbiased fashion, we performed a whole-genome, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based CRISPR-Cas9 screen in primary murine CD8 T cells. A dual-readout design using the activation marker CD137 allowed us to uncouple genes involved in PD-1 regulation from those governing general T cell activation.

RESULTS

We found that the inactivation of one of several members of the TMED/EMP24/GP25L/p24 family of transport proteins, most prominently TMED10, reduced PD-1 cell surface abundance, thereby augmenting T cell activity. Another client protein was cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), which was also suppressed by TMED inactivation. Treatment with TMED inhibitor AGN192403 led to lysosomal degradation of the TMED-PD-1 complex and reduced PD-1 abundance in tumor-infiltrating CD8 T cells (TIL) in mice, thus reversing T cell dysfunction. Clinically corroborating these findings, single-cell RNA analyses revealed a positive correlation between TMED expression in CD8 TIL, and both a T cell dysfunction signature and lack of ICB response. Similarly, patients receiving a TIL product with high TMED expression had a shorter overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Our results uncover a novel mechanism of PD-1 regulation, and identify a pharmacologically tractable target whose inhibition suppresses PD-1 abundance and T cell dysfunction.

Do corticosteroids affect immunotherapy efficacy in malignancy? - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Early studies indicated that corticosteroids may limit the survival benefit from immunotherapy. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the effect corticosteroids have on immunotherapy in patients with malignancy, when adjusted for potentially confounding effects of corticosteroids given for palliative indications.

METHODS

Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and Medline) were searched on 1 February 2023. Studies that measured response or survival to immunotherapy in people receiving corticosteroids for non-cancer indications compared to either no corticosteroids or corticosteroids for cancer-related indications were included. Studies exclusively evaluating the effect of corticosteroids administered for immune-related adverse events (irAE) were excluded to avoid immortal time bias. Pooled odds and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot and Egger's regression model.

RESULTS

Eight thousand four hundred and twenty-six titles were identified on our search. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Administration of corticosteroids does not have a statistically significant effect on survival and response to immunotherapy when administered for non-cancer-related indications, with a pooled odds ratio for overall response rate 1.01 (95% CI 0.64-1.60); pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression free survival 0.87 (95% CI 0.68-1.12); and pooled HR for overall survival 0.79 (95% CI 0.59-1.05).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review indicates that administration of corticosteroids does not affect response to immunotherapy nor survival outcomes, when removing confounding palliative corticosteroid indications. These results are limited by the retrospective nature of the studies included, small sample sizes, lack of information about corticosteroid dosing and the inclusion of irAE in two of the studies which could bias the results.

Urinary soluble PD-1 as a biomarker of checkpoint inhibitor-induced acute tubulointerstitial nephritis

Background

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-AIN) has a not completely understood pathophysiology. Our objectives were to analyze possible biomarkers for the differentiation between acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and AIN, especially in cancer patients, and to study the participation of the immune checkpoint pathway in ICI-AIN.

Methods

We performed an observational study. We recruited patients with incident diagnosis of ICI-AIN (n = 19). We measured soluble PD-1 (sPD-1), sPD-L1, and sPD-L2 in serum and urine at diagnosis and compared to it patients with non-ICI-related AIN (non-ICI-AIN) (n = 18) and ATN (n = 21). The findings were validated in an independent cohort from another institution (n = 30). Also, we performed PD-L1 and PD-L2 immunostaining of kidney biopsies from patients with ICI-AIN and compared to patients with non-ICI-AIN.

Results

Urinary sPD-1 (usPD-1) was higher in patients with AIN compared to ATN (P = .03). Patients with AIN also showed higher serum sPD-1 (ssPD-1) than patients with ATN (P = .021). In cancer patients, usPD-1 <129.3 pg/ml had a 71.43% sensitivity and 94.44% specificity to differentiate ATN from ICI-AIN, with a likelihood ratio of 12.86. In the external validation cohort, the same cutoff showed a sensitivity of 80%. In kidney biopsies, patients with ICI-AIN showed higher density of PD-L1 positive tubules than patients with non-ICI-AIN (P = .02). The proportion of patients having >2.64/mm2 PD-L2 positive tubules was higher among patients with ICI-AIN compared to non-ICI-AIN (P = .034). There was a positive correlation (P = .009, r = 0.72) between usPD-1 and the number of PD-L1 positive tubules.

Conclusions

UsPD-1 and ssPD-1 are higher in AIN than ATN. Moreover, there was a strong correlation between usPD-1 and renal tubular PD-L1 expression. Our findings suggest a role of usPD-1 as non-invasive biomarker to differentiate ICI-AIN from ATN, especially in cancer patients, which has been confirmed in an external validation cohort.

A phase Ib randomized multicenter trial of isolated hepatic perfusion in combination with ipilimumab and nivolumab for uveal melanoma metastases (SCANDIUM II trial)

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare malignancy where 50% of patients develop metastatic disease primarily affecting the liver. Approximately 40% of patients with metastatic UM respond to one-time isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with high-dose melphalan. This phase I trial investigates the safety and clinical efficacy of IHP combined with ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Immunotherapy-naïve patients were randomized in this phase I trial to receive either IHP followed by IPI 3 mg/kg and NIVO 1 mg/kg (IPI3/NIVO1) for four cycles (post-operative arm), or one cycle of preoperative IPI3/NIVO1, IHP and then three cycles of IPI3/NIVO1 (pre-post-operative arm), followed by maintenance therapy with NIVO 480 mg for 1 year.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled and randomized. Three patients did not undergo IHP as planned. In total, 11/18 patients (6 in the post-operative arm and 5 in the pre-post-operative arm) did not complete the planned four cycles of IPI3/NIVO1. Toxicity to IHP was similar in both groups, but the number of immune-related adverse events (AEs) was higher in the pre-post-operative arm. Among assessable patients, overall response rate was 57% in the post-operative arm (4/7) and 22% in the pre-post-operative arm (2/9).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with IHP and IPI3/NIVO1 was associated with severe AEs. The efficacy of this combination is encouraging with high response rates. One cycle of preoperative IPI/NIVO before IHP did not show potential benefits in terms of safety or efficacy.

Management and outcome of oncological patients under immune checkpoint inhibitors presenting at the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

With the rising use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in oncology, emergency physicians are increasingly confronted with their immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We described the types of irAEs presenting to the ED of a Belgian cancer centre and determined associations with the development of an irAE and other patient's characteristics. Secondary objectives describe the therapeutic management and determine 7 and 30-day mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of ED visits of patients on ICI from 15 December 2016 to 6 December 2020 was performed. Clinical presentation, cancer characteristics and type of ICI were extracted by a single abstractor. We recorded any suspicion of irAE in the ED and confirmation of an irAE was based on the patient's oncologist report. Outcome was based on mortality at date of last follow-up.

RESULTS

227 patients on ICI presented to the ED, with a total of 451 visits. 54 (12%) of the visits resulted in a diagnosis of irAE. Four clinical features were associated with an irAE: gastrointestinal complaints (p=0.01), skin rashes (p=0.02), acute renal failure (p=0.002) and abnormal liver function (p=0.04). An irAE was also associated with three different factors: a cancer status in remission (OR=5.33, 95% CI 2.57 to 11.04), a combination of two ICIs (OR=4.43, 95% CI 2.09 to 9.42) and a medical history of irAE (OR=2.44, 95% CI 1.27 to 4.68). 30-day mortality was lower in the irAE group (0%) than in the non-irAE group (13%, 95% CI 9% to 19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oncological patients under ICI presenting in the ED are more likely to have an irAE if they present with gastrointestinal and dermatological complaints, acute renal failure and abnormal liver function. This is also true for patients with any history of irAE, a concomitant use of two ICIs and with a cancer status in remission.

Capmatinib plus nivolumab in pretreated patients with EGFR wild-type advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Dysregulated MET is an established oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MET signaling may also suppress anticancer immune responses. Concomitant MET inhibition with capmatinib (a MET inhibitor) synergistically enhanced the efficacy of immunotherapies in murine cancer models, regardless of tumor dependency to MET signaling. Here, we report results of a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of capmatinib plus nivolumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC, previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients were allocated into high-MET or low-MET groups according to MET expression determined by immunohistochemistry, MET gene copy number as assessed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization, and presence of MET exon 14 skipping mutation, then received capmatinib 400 mg, oral, twice daily in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate per RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was met in both the high-MET (N = 16) and low-MET (N = 30) groups. In the high-MET and low-MET groups, respectively, the estimated mean 6-month PFS rate (95 % credible interval) by Bayesian analysis was 68.9 % (48.5-85.7) and 50.9 % (35.6-66.4). The Kaplan-Meier median PFS (95 % CI) was 6.2 months (3.5-19.2) and 4.2 months (1.8-7.4). The overall response rate (95 % CI) was 25.0 % (7.3-52.4) and 16.7 % (5.6-34.7). Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (≥30 % any grade, N = 46) were nausea (52.2 %), peripheral edema (34.8 %), and increased blood creatinine (30.4 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Capmatinib plus nivolumab showed clinical activity and manageable safety in pretreated patients with advanced EGFR wild-type NSCLC, independent of MET status.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02323126.

Multimodal stimulation screens reveal unique and shared genes limiting T cell fitness

Genes limiting T cell antitumor activity may serve as therapeutic targets. It has not been systematically studied whether there are regulators that uniquely or broadly contribute to T cell fitness. We perform genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens in primary CD8 T cells to uncover genes negatively impacting fitness upon three modes of stimulation: (1) intense, triggering activation-induced cell death (AICD); (2) acute, triggering expansion; (3) chronic, causing dysfunction. Besides established regulators, we uncover genes controlling T cell fitness either specifically or commonly upon differential stimulation. Dap5 ablation, ranking highly in all three screens, increases translation while enhancing tumor killing. Loss of Icam1-mediated homotypic T cell clustering amplifies cell expansion and effector functions after both acute and intense stimulation. Lastly, Ctbp1 inactivation induces functional T cell persistence exclusively upon chronic stimulation. Our results functionally annotate fitness regulators based on their unique or shared contribution to traits limiting T cell antitumor activity.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is unreliable in predicting melanoma mortality for both younger and older patients

BACKGROUND

Melanoma disease patterns vary with patient age.

AIM

To evaluate sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in managing melanoma at differing patient ages.

METHODS

Online prediction tools were applied to compare SLNB positivity (SLNB+) and survival risk at patient ages 20-80. Tübingen melanoma data were used to determine variations in the hazard ratio of SLNB+ for mortality at different patient ages.

RESULTS

Regardless of tumour thickness, predicted SLNB+ rates were markedly higher than mortality rates for 20-year-old patients. For 80-year-old patients, it is the opposite.

DISCUSSION

If 1000 20-year-olds with a 0.4 mm thickness non-ulcerated melanoma underwent SLNB, 100 would likely be positive. If all 100 were to be offered adjuvant drug therapy (ADT), fewer than three more melanoma deaths in those 1000 patients would be avoided. In total, 97 patients would have received medication they may never have needed. If 1000 80-year-olds with a 3 mm thickness non-ulcerated melanoma underwent SLNB, only 40 would likely be positive. In total, 274 patients would be predicted to die of melanoma, 245 being SLNB negative and 29 SLNB+. ADT linked to SLNB+ could deny treatment to 89% of these high-risk patients.

LIMITATIONS

The authors relied on published risk data.

CONCLUSION

SLNB has poor specificity at predicting mortality in young melanoma patients and poor sensitivity in older patients. SLNB is not indicated in managing cutaneous melanoma for patients under 40 or over 60 years of age. Many such patients could be managed with wide local excision alone in their clinician's office-based practice. For all cutaneous melanoma patients at all ages, linking ADT to BAUSSS biomarker, (an algorithm of Breslow thickness, age, ulceration, subtype, sex and Site) rather than SLNB+ is likely more appropriate. BAUSSS provides a more accurate melanoma-specific mortality risk assessment for patients without burdening them with added surgery, hospitalization, costs or morbidity risk.

Univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization study identified the key role of gut microbiota in immunotherapeutic toxicity

BACKGROUND

In cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), there is emerging evidence suggesting a correlation between gut microbiota and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, the exact roles of gut microbiota and the causal associations are yet to be clarified.

METHODS

To investigate this, we first conducted a univariable bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Instrumental variables (IVs) for gut microbiota were retrieved from the MiBioGen consortium (18,340 participants). GWAS summary data for irAEs were gathered from an ICIs-treated cohort with 1,751 cancer patients. Various MR analysis methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR PRESSO, maximum likelihood (ML), weighted median, weighted mode, and cML-MA-BIC, were used. Furthermore, multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis was performed to account for possible influencing instrumental variables.

RESULTS

Our analysis identified fourteen gut bacterial taxa that were causally associated with irAEs. Notably, Lachnospiraceae was strongly associated with an increased risk of both high-grade and all-grade irAEs, even after accounting for the effect of BMI in the MVMR analysis. Akkermansia, Verrucomicrobiaceae, and Anaerostipes were found to exert protective roles in high-grade irAEs. However, Ruminiclostridium6, Coprococcus3, Collinsella, and Eubacterium (fissicatena group) were associated with a higher risk of developing high-grade irAEs. RuminococcaceaeUCG004, and DefluviitaleaceaeUCG011 were protective against all-grade irAEs, whereas Porphyromonadaceae, Roseburia, Eubacterium (brachy group), and Peptococcus were associated with an increased risk of all-grade irAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis highlights a strong causal association between Lachnospiraceae and irAEs, along with some other gut microbial taxa. These findings provide potential modifiable targets for managing irAEs and warrant further investigation.

Early morning immune checkpoint blockade and overall survival of patients with metastatic cancer: An In-depth chronotherapeutic study

INTRODUCTION

Recent retrospective studies suggest potential large patient's benefit through proper timing of immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). The association between ICB treatment timing and patient survival, neoplastic response and toxicities was investigated, together with interactions with performance status (PS) and sex.

METHODS

A cohort of patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors, who received pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, or avelumab, alone or with concomitant chemotherapy, between November 2015 and March 2021, at the Centre Leon Bérard (France), was retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

361 patients were investigated (80% non-small cell lung cancer patients, mean [SD] age: 63 [11] years, 39% of women, 83% PS0-1 at first infusion, 19% received concomitant chemotherapy). ICB were administered from 07:25 to 17:21 and optimal morning/afternoon cut-off was 11:37. Morning infusions were associated with increased OS as compared to afternoon (median 30.3 vs 15.9 months, p = 0.0024; HR 1.56 [1.17-2.1], p = 0.003). A strong PS-timing interaction was found (PS0-1 patients, HR=1.53 [1.10-2.12], p = 0.011; PS2-3 patients, HR=0.50 [0.25-0.97], p = 0.042). Morning PS0-1 patients displayed increased OS (median 36.7 vs 21.3 months, p = 0.023), partial/complete response rate (58% vs 41%, p = 0.027), and grade1-3 toxicities (49% vs 34%, p = 0.028). Mortality risk ratio between infusions at worst time-of-day, estimated at 13:36 [12:48-14:23], and in early morning was equal to 4.8 ([2.3-10.1], p = 0.008). Timing differences in toxicities resulted significant only in female patients (women vs men: p < 0.001 vs 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Early morning ICB infusion was associated with increased OS, response, and toxicities in patients with PS0-1 as compared to later infusions within the day. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm this retrospective study.

Radiological assessment of immunotherapy effects and immune checkpoint-related pneumonitis for lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy have revolutionized advanced lung cancer care. Interestingly, the host responses for patients received ICIs therapy are distinguishing from those with cytotoxic drugs, showing potential initial transient worsening of disease burden, pseudoprogression and delayed time to treatment response. Thus, a new imaging criterion to evaluate the response for immunotherapy should be developed. ICIs treatment is associated with unique adverse events, including potential life-threatening immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-pneumonitis) if treated patients are not managed promptly. Currently, the diagnosis and clinical management of ICI-pneumonitis remain challenging. As the clinical manifestation is often nonspecific, computed tomography (CT) scan and X-ray films play important roles in diagnosis and triage. This article reviews the complications of immunotherapy in lung cancer and illustrates various radiologic patterns of ICI-pneumonitis. Additionally, it is tried to differentiate ICI-pneumonitis from other pulmonary pathologies common to lung cancer such as radiation pneumonitis, bacterial pneumonia and coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) infection in recent months. Maybe it is challenging to distinguish radiologically but clinical presentation may help.

Long-term survival with systemic therapy in the last decade: Can melanoma be cured?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to prolong survival of patients with several types of cancer, and the finding was first established in melanoma. Previously, systemic therapy for advanced melanoma aimed only at tumor control and palliation of symptoms. However, in recent years, some patients who received systemic therapy have achieved a complete response and survived without continuous treatment for more than several years. This review discusses the long-term survival rates achieved with currently used systemic therapies and their future perspectives. Long-term survival is currently most likely to be achieved with the use of the standard-dose combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab, however, this regimen is associated with a high frequency of serious or persistent immune-related adverse events. Several new anti-PD-1-based combination therapies with a better risk-benefit balance are currently under development. Although the acral and mucosal subtypes tend to be less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-PD-1-based combination therapy should continue to be investigated for these subtypes owing to its potential for better long-term survival. With the development of efficacious immunotherapy and targeted therapy, it is important to determine the optimal duration of systemic therapy to avoid unnecessary health and financial burdens as well as to improve efforts to support long-term cancer survivors. As the goal of systemic therapy shifts from tumor control to long-term survival, in future clinical trials, long-term clinical outcomes should be evaluated to assess the benefits of novel agents.

Melanoma-Modern Treatment for Metastatic Melanoma

ABSTRACT

Traditional chemotherapy has been ineffective in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Until the use of checkpoint inhibitors, patients had very limited survival. Since the original US Food and Drug Administration approval of ipilimumab over a decade ago, the armamentarium of immunotherapeutic agents has expanded to include programmed cell death protein 1 and lymphocyte activation gene 3 antibodies, requiring a nuanced approach to the selection of frontline treatments, managing patients through recurrence and progression, and determining length of therapy. Herein, we review the existing evidence supporting current standard immunotherapy regimens and discuss the clinical decision-making involved in treating patients with metastatic melanoma with checkpoint inhibitors.

Immunotherapy in cutaneous melanoma and biologics in psoriatic disease: similarities and differences from a clinical multidisciplinary perspective

INTRODUCTION

Immunomodulating therapies harness the power of the immune system to combat disease. In advanced melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved survival outcomes by activating the immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. In psoriasis, interleukin inhibitors effectively suppress inflammation and improve disease symptoms.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a meta-opinion-based consensus paper on the analogies and differences in treatment mechanisms, duration, frequency between immunotherapy for advanced melanoma and biologics for psoriasis. Combining the current scientific evidence with expert insights, we provide valuable guidance for future research and decision-making processes.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of immunological treatments in melanoma and psoriasis has revolutionized dermatology, but the quest for tailored therapies that maximize efficacy continues. Managing cutaneous exacerbations during melanoma immunotherapy in psoriatic patients remains challenging. Similarly, treating oncologic psoriasis patients resistant to traditional therapies requires individualized approaches. Research is needed to identify response predictors in both conditions and address the sustainability of healthcare systems due to the high cost of biologics. Drug delay studies for psoriasis and longer follow-up evaluations after immunotherapy discontinuation in melanoma are essential for optimizing treatment outcomes and resource allocation.

Perspectives on Psoriasiform Adverse Events from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Lessons Learned from Our Practice

Background: New oncologic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have revolutionized the survival and prognosis of cancer patients. However, these therapies are often complicated by immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) that may impact quality of life and potentially limit their use. Among these adverse events are psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis that may develop de novo or flare under treatment with ICIs. Given the exceptional immune status of patients receiving ICIs, managing these conditions without interfering with the effect of the oncologic treatment may prove very challenging. Aim: To review the literature data on ICI-induced psoriasis exacerbation or development, to present our own experience, and to discuss the pathogenic mechanisms underlying this association and the optimal therapeutic approach for these patients. Case Reports: We report three cases of ICI-induced de novo psoriasis and two cases of ICI-induced psoriasis exacerbation that required systemic treatment. Oral acitretin treatment successfully controlled psoriasis lesions in three cases and allowed for the continuation of immunotherapy. Literature Review: We performed a medical literature search across several databases (PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar) using the search terms "immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced psoriasis/psoriasiform dermatitis/psoriasis arthritis". We identified and revised 80 relevant publications that reported 1102 patients with psoriasis and/or psoriasis arthritis induced or exacerbated by ICIs. We assessed the type of cancer, the therapeutic agent involved, the clinical form of psoriasis, the presence or absence of psoriatic arthritis, the personal and family history of psoriasis, the age, the gender, the time until onset or exacerbation of skin lesions, the specific treatment recommended, the need for ICI discontinuation, and the patient's outcome. Conclusions: As ICIs represent a fairly novel therapy, the association with several adverse effects is only now unraveling. Psoriasis exacerbation or onset following the initiation of immunotherapy is one such example, as more and more reports and case series are being published. Awareness of the relationship between psoriasis and treatment with ICIs, prompt recognition, and initiation of adequate skin-directed therapies are essential for the avoidance of skin lesions worsening, the need for systemic treatments that may interfere with ICIs' effects, or the discontinuation of the latter. In the absence of generally accepted guidelines, it is advisable to treat patients with severe, widespread psoriasis with drugs that do not impair the effects of immunotherapy and thus do not alter the patient's prognosis.

Diagnosing and Managing Uveitis Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review

This review aims to provide an understanding of the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of uveitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In the wake of these molecules being increasingly employed as a treatment against different cancers, cases of uveitis post-ICI therapy have also been increasingly reported in the literature, warranting an extensive exploration of the clinical presentations, risk factors, and pathophysiological mechanisms of ICI-induced uveitis. This review further provides an understanding of the association between ICIs and uveitis, and assesses the efficacy of current diagnostic tools, underscoring the need for advanced techniques to enable early detection and accurate assessment. Further, it investigates the therapeutic strategies for ICI-related uveitis, weighing the benefits and limitations of existing treatment regimens, and discussing current challenges and emerging therapies in the context of their potential efficacy and side effects. Through an overview of the short-term and long-term outcomes, this article suggests recommendations and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration between ophthalmologists and oncologists. Finally, the review highlights promising avenues for future research and development in the field, potentially informing transformative approaches in the ocular assessment of patients under immunotherapy and the management of uveitis following ICI therapy.

Small-vessel vasculitis leading to severe acute kidney injury after ipilimumab: a case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective monoclonal antibodies used in cancer treatment, particularly in metastatic melanoma. They target proteins responsible for cancer cells evading the immune system. However, their use can lead to immune-related adverse events, with the skin and gastrointestinal tract being commonly affected. Kidney involvement is rarer, with interstitial nephritis being the most common manifestation. In a unique case, kidney biopsy-proven small-vessel vasculitis with arteriolar immune deposition was observed following ipilimumab administration.

Discontinuation risk from adverse events: immunotherapy alone vs. combined with chemotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

While immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (Chemo-IO) is generally recognized for providing superior outcomes compared to monotherapy (mono-IO), it is associated with a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), which may lead to treatment discontinuation. In this study, we compared the rates of treatment discontinuation between mono-IO and Chemo-IO as first-line treatments for various solid tumors.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed clinical trials from databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and an additional source) published from January 1, 2018, to July 10, 2023. We included phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that utilized immunotherapy agents in at least one arm as first-line treatments for a variety of solid tumors. Data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) extension statement for network meta-analysis. A random effects model was used for the network meta-analysis, with the risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool II. The primary outcomes encompassed treatment discontinuation rates due to TRAEs among patients who underwent immunotherapy, either alone or combined with chemotherapy, for various solid tumors. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare between treatment groups.

RESULTS

From 29 RCTs, a total of 21,677 patients and 5 types of treatment were analyzed. Compared to mono-IO, Chemo-IO showed a significantly higher rate of discontinuation due to TRAEs (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.98-3.63). Subgroup analysis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients also exhibited a greater risk of discontinuation due to TRAEs with Chemo-IO compared to mono-IO (RR 2.93, 95% CI 1.67-5.14). Additional analyses evaluating discontinuation rates due to either treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) or AEs regardless of causality (any AEs) consistently revealed an elevated risk associated with Chemo-IO.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemo-IO was associated with an elevated risk of treatment discontinuation not only due to TRAEs but also any AEs or TEAEs. Given that the treatment duration can impact clinical outcomes, a subset of patients might benefit more from mono-IO than combination therapy. Further research is imperative to identify and characterize this subset.

The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: Impact on the Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Modulation as a Potential Therapy

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ubiquitous nuclear receptor with a broad range of functions, both in tumor cells and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Activation of AhR has been shown to have a carcinogenic effect in a variety of organs, through induction of cellular proliferation and migration, promotion of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and inhibition of apoptosis, among other functions. However, the impact on immune cell function is more complicated, with both pro- and anti-tumorigenic roles identified. Although targeting AhR in cancer has shown significant promise in pre-clinical studies, there has been limited efficacy in phase III clinical trials to date. With the contrasting roles of AhR activation on immune cell polarization, understanding the impact of AhR activation on the tumor immune microenvironment is necessary to guide therapies targeting the AhR. This review article summarizes the state of knowledge of AhR activation on the TME, limitations of current findings, and the potential for modulation of the AhR as a cancer therapy.

Detectable ctDNA at the time of treatment cessation of ipilimumab and nivolumab for toxicity predicts disease progression in advanced melanoma patients

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has led to unprecedented outcomes for melanoma patients but is associated with toxicity. ICI resumption after high grade irAEs poses a significant challenge in the clinical management of melanoma patients and there are no biomarkers that can help identify patients that might benefit from resuming treatment. This study aims to determine if circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels at the time of treatment-limiting irAE could guide treatment decisions in this clinical context.

Methods

This is a retrospective exploratory biomarker study from 34 patients treated with combination ICI for stage IV melanoma. Patients had a treatment-limiting toxicity and a baseline plasma collection prior to commencing ICI and within 6 weeks of stopping therapy. Blood samples were tested for ctDNA at baseline and cessation therapy.

Results

Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached (24-month PFS rate 54% and OS rate 72.3%). PD occurred in 47% (16/34) of patients. Median PFS with detectable ctDNA from plasma collected at the time of toxicity was 6.5 months while not reached (NR) with undetectable levels (HR: 4.0, 95% CI 0.95-17.5, p=0.0023). Median OS with detectable ctDNA at cessation for toxicity was 19.4 months and NR for undetectable ctDNA (HR: 3.9, 95%CI 20.8-18.6, p=0.024). Positive ctDNA at the time of cessation was highly specific (specificity 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-0.99, PPV 0.88, 95% CI 0.53-0.99). However, ctDNA negativity has low sensitivity as a predictor of ongoing disease control (sensitivity 0.437, 95% CI 0.23-0.67). Notably, 4/9 (44%) ctDNA negative patients who had disease progression had brain only disease progression.

Conclusions

Undetectable ctDNA and CR on imaging after stopping immunotherapy for toxicity results in high rates of long-term durable control. For patients with immunotherapy related toxicity, who have persistent ctDNA at 8 - 12 weeks, the risk of disease progression is significant.

Treatment and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated colitis/diarrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the outcomes of cancer patients. However, ICIs often lead to colitis/diarrhea. This study aimed to assess the treatment of ICIs-associated colitis/diarrhea and outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible studies which investigated the treatment and outcomes of colitis/diarrhea developing in patients who received ICIs. The pooled incidences of any-grade colitis/diarrhea, low-grade colitis, high-grade colitis, low-grade diarrhea, and high-grade diarrhea as well as the pooled rates of response to treatment, mortality, and ICIs permanent discontinuation and restarts in patients with ICIs-associated colitis/diarrhea were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Among the 11,492 papers initially identified, 27 studies were included. The pooled incidences of any-grade colitis/diarrhea, low-grade colitis, high-grade colitis, low-grade diarrhea, and high-grade diarrhea were 17%, 3%, 17%, 13%, and 15%, respectively. The pooled rates of overall response, response to corticosteroid therapy, and response to biological agents were 88%, 50%, and 96%, respectively. The pooled short-term mortality in patients with ICIs-associated colitis/diarrhea was 2%. The pooled incidences of ICIs permanent discontinuation and restarts were 43% and 33%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ICIs-associated colitis/diarrhea is common, but rarely lethal. Half of them are responsive to corticosteroid therapy. There is a fairly high rate of response to biological agents in steroid-refractory colitis/diarrhea patients.

Outcome and treatment-related adverse events of combined immune checkpoint inhibition with flipped dosing in a real-world cohort of 79 patients with metastasized melanoma

Introduction

Combined immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with ipilimumab and nivolumab is a widely used treatment regimen for metastatic melanoma with non-resectable metastases. Nevertheless, the standard dose of ipilimumab 3 mg/kg bw and nivolumab 1 mg/kg bw is associated with a high rate of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) (59% grade 3-4). In the CheckMate 511 study, it could be shown that flipped dosing with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg bw and nivolumab 3 mg/kg bw resulted in a significant reduction of trAE.

Methods

We have also used this regimen in the clinical setting and report the trAE, progression-free survival, and overall survival for 79 patients with metastatic melanoma who started combined ICI in the flipped dosing between March 2019 and April 2020.

Results

in total, 40 patients started first-line, 50% of whom had an elevated lactate dehydrogenase level at baseline. The disease control rate of these patients was 50%. The 2-year overall survival rate 67%. Moreover, 33% of the patients suffered grade 3 or 4 treatment related adverse events.

Discussion

The results of our study correspond very well to the results of the CheckMate 511 study (2-year OS: 65%, grade 3-4 immune-related side effects: 35%). Combined ICI with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg bw and nivolumab 3 mg/kg bw seems to be an equally effective but better-tolerated therapy regimen for metastasized melanoma patients, also in a real-world cohort.

Chapter 3: Management of kidney injury caused by cancer drug therapy, from clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022

Cisplatin should be administered with diuretics and Magnesium supplementation under adequate hydration to avoid renal impairment. Patients should be evaluated for eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) during the treatment with pemetrexed, as kidney injury has been reported. Pemetrexed should be administered with caution in patients with a CCr (creatinine clearance) < 45 mL/min. Mesna is used to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis in patients receiving ifosfamide. Febuxostat is effective in avoiding hyperuricemia induced by TLS (tumor lysis syndrome). Preventative rasburicase is recommended in high-risk cases of TLS. Thrombotic microangiopathy could be triggered by anticancer drugs and there is no evidence of efficacy of plasma exchange therapy. When proteinuria occurs during treatment with anti-angiogenic agents or multi-kinase inhibitors, dose reductions or interruptions based on grading should be considered. Grade 3 proteinuria and renal dysfunction require urgent intervention, including drug interruption or withdrawal, and referral to a nephrologist should be considered. The first-line drugs used for blood pressure elevation due to anti-angiogenic agents are ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers). The protein binding of drugs and their pharmacokinetics are considerably altered in patients with hypoalbuminemia. The clearance of rituximab is increased in patients with proteinuria, and the correlation with urinary IgG suggests similar pharmacokinetic changes when using other antibody drugs. AIN (acute interstitial nephritis) is the most common cause of ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitor)-related kidney injury that is often treated with steroids. The need for renal biopsy in patients with kidney injury that occurs during treatment with ICI remains controversial.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Bladder and Other Solid Malignancies: How Long is Enough?

The introduction of T-cell targeted immunomodulators blocking the PD-1 and PD-L1 axis is unquestionably one of the most notable advancements in the treatment of advanced or metastatic solid malignancies, including bladder cancer. Immune checkpoint antibodies are now widely utilized as monotherapies or in combination with other systemic therapies in the first or subsequent lines of treatment in approximately 50 cancer types. Deep and durable responses and long tails of survival curves are hallmarks of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, treatment can have negative impacts, including serious treatment-related side effects as well as a high financial burden to individual patients and the healthcare system. There is increasing data that the benefit of immune checkpoint treatment may persist after treatment is discontinued for reasons other than progressive disease, particularly in patients who have achieved a durable complete response. However, the optimal treatment duration and activity after treatment reinitiation remains undefined and will likely be influenced by disease biology (histology and genomics), treatment (monotherapy or combination therapy), and disease context (depth and duration of response). Well-designed prospective clinical trials and the development and validation of biomarkers that predict outcomes after treatment cessation are needed to move the field forward.

Cured or Not? Long-term Outcomes of Immunotherapy Responders. Focus on Melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrated robust antitumor activity and tolerable safety in advanced melanoma. Data on long-term outcome of patients who benefited from this therapy and who are still free of progression despite ICI discontinuation is now available. We review here the characteristics of long-term ICI responders and address the critical question of cure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Long-term outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma enrolled in large phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials evaluating ICI in metastatic melanoma is now available. Durable responses, with more than 6 years of median follow-up, may persist after discontinuation. They occur more frequently in patients who achieved a complete response rather than in patients who had partial response or stable disease. Although long-term clinical benefit is more frequent in patients with high PDL-1 expression and smaller tumor burden, durable response may also be observed regardless of baseline characteristics. In patients with asymptomatic brain metastasis, combined immunotherapy (ipilimumab plus nivolumab) may also lead to long-term remission. Clinical trials confirm the durable antitumor activity of ICI. Although the hope for cure seems reasonable for many patients in this situation, late relapses may occur and no relapse-predictive biomarkers have been identified yet. Long-term responders who relapse can respond to a rechallenge of ICI although data are limited concerning the rate and the duration of this new response.

Postmarketing surveillance of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy in Japanese patients with unresectable malignant melanoma

Although malignant melanoma is relatively rare in Japan, it is often diagnosed at a later stage than in Western countries. Nivolumab and ipilimumab are immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, respectively. Owing to their complementary anticancer effects, nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy (N + I) has been studied and approved for treating malignant melanoma in various countries including Japan. Real-world postmarketing surveillance was implemented to record treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients treated with N + I following its approval in Japan. Patients were eligible for registration if they had unresectable malignant melanoma and started N + I between September 2018 and August 2019. The observation period was 13 weeks from starting N + I. Only safety information was collected and evaluated. The final case report form lock was March 2021. Overall, 173 patients (median age, 66.0 years; performance status 0-1, 88.4%; skin: 53.2%; mucosal: 32.4%) were eligible for the analyses. Overall, 34.1% of patients completed 4 doses of N + I. N + I was discontinued by 63.0% (due to adverse events in 67.9% and disease progression/death in 22.9%). Any grade and grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 73.41% and 52.02%, respectively. TRAEs in ≥10 patients were hepatic function abnormal (any grade/grade ≥3: 23.12%/13.29%), pyrexia (10.40%/0.58%), diarrhea (9.25%/2.89%), rash (8.67%/0.58%), hypophysitis (5.78%/5.20%), interstitial lung disease (5.78%/2.89%), and liver disorder (5.78%/4.62%). TRAEs were classified as recovered (36.99% of patients), recovering (44.51%), unrecovered (13.29%), recovered with sequelae (2.31%), and death (1.73%). Overall, 24 of 34 patients (70.59%) with gastrointestinal-related and 53 of 65 (81.54%) liver-related TRAEs received treatment, such as a steroid with/without an immunosuppressant; most patients recovered within 1 to 2 months. In conclusion, this postmarketing surveillance of N + I in patients with unresectable malignant melanoma revealed no new safety concerns compared with results of prior studies. Immune-related TRAEs were generally manageable by appropriate treatment including a steroid.

The Revolution of Immunotherapy in Gynecological Cancers: The Lazarus Effect in Endometrial Cancer

Patients with solid tumors and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) are eligible for immunotherapy. Recently, different reports described patients with poor performance status (PS), unrelated to comorbidities, which showed a rapid improvement of their clinical conditions under immunotherapy, which evoked a Lazarus response. Very few data on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in patients with gynecological malignancies and poor PS are available. Based on the GARNET trial, Dostarlimab, a monoclonal antibody anti-programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), has been approved in advanced or recurrent mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer (EC) which progressed after platinum-based therapy. For the first time, in gynecological oncology, an immune checkpoint inhibitor drastically changed the clinical practice. We collected a multicenter case series of six patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma and PS ECOG 3-4 treated with Dostarlimab, showing exceptionally quick responses and significant improvement of PS to configure a Lazarus response.

Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Cancer and Viral Hepatitis: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Despite the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), patients with a viral hepatitis have been excluded from clinical trials because of safety concerns. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) in patients with viral hepatitis who received ICIs for cancer treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in patients with cancer and concurrent hepatitis B or C, who had undergone treatment with ICI at MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019.

RESULTS

Of the 1076 patients screened, we identified 33 with concurrent hepatitis. All 10 patients with HBV underwent concomitant antiviral therapy during ICI treatment. Sixteen of the 23 patients with HCV received it before the initiation of ICI. The median follow-up time was 33 months (95% CI, 23-45) and the median duration of ICI therapy was 3 months (IQR, 1.9-6.6). Of the 33 patients, 12 (39%) experienced irAEs (immune-related adverse events) of any grade, with 2 (6%) having grade 3 or higher. None of the patients developed hepatitis toxicities.

CONCLUSION

ICIs may be a therapeutic option with an acceptable safety profile in patients with cancer and advanced liver disease.

Evaluation of appendectomy as a potential risk factor for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated enterocolitis

Aims: The relationship between appendectomy and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) enterocolitis was explored. Methods: Patients who began ICIs between July 2010 and September 2020 (n = 10,907) were included. The exposure group included patients with evidence of appendectomy prior to ICIs in operative notes (n = 380). The control group included patients with evidence of normal appendix in radiologic reports (n = 3602). ICI enterocolitis was defined as histopathologic evidence of colitis or enteritis attributed to ICIs. The association between appendectomy and ICI enterocolitis was characterized by multivariate logistic regression. Results: 248 patients (6.2%) developed ICI enterocolitis. The odds of ICI enterocolitis were similar among those with prior appendectomy and those without appendectomy (adjusted odds ratio: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.49-1.36; p = 0.449). Conclusion: No association was found between prior appendectomy and ICI enterocolitis.

Better Late Than Never: The Impact of Steroidal Treatment on the Outcome of Melanoma Patients Treated with Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Successful treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) requires the balanced activation of the immune system. Over-activation may result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which often require steroidal treatment. This study examined the possible impact of steroids on treatment efficacy in melanoma patients concerning initiation timing and dosage.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with advanced melanoma who underwent first-line ICI therapy during 2014-2020 was conducted.

RESULTS

Among the 415 patients, two-hundred patients (48.3%) were exposed to steroids during the first line, most of them due to irAEs (n = 169, 84.5%). Nearly a quarter of them were exposed to steroids within the first four weeks of treatment. Surprisingly, steroidal exposure was associated with better progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.74, p = 0.015); however, early exposure (within four weeks of treatment) resulted in a significantly shorter PFS compared to late exposure (adjusted HR 3.2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early exposure to corticosteroids during the priming phase of ICI therapy could impede the establishment of an effective immune response. These results suggest that caution should be exercised when considering the use of steroids for the management of early-onset irAEs.

Concurrent immune checkpoint inhibition and selective immunosuppressive therapy in patients with immune-related enterocolitis

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is often suspended because of immune-related enterocolitis (irEC). We examined the effect of resumption of ICIs with or without concurrent selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) on rates of symptom recurrence and survival outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study examined patients who were treated with ICI and developed irEC requiring SIT (infliximab or vedolizumab) for initial symptom control or to facilitate steroid tapering between May 2015 and June 2020. After symptom resolution, patients were restarted either on ICI alone or on concurrent ICI and SIT at the discretion of the treating physicians. The associations between irEC recurrence and treatment group were assessed via univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 138 included patients who required SIT for initial irEC symptom control, 61 (44.2%) patients resumed ICI without concurrent SIT (control group) and 77 (55.8%) patients resumed ICI therapy with concurrent SIT: 33 with infliximab and 44 with vedolizumab. After symptom resolution, patients in the control group were more commonly restarted on a different ICI regimen (65.6%) compared with those receiving SIT (31.2%) (p<0.001). The total number of ICI doses administered after irEC resolution and ICI resumption was similar in both groups (four to five doses). Recurrence of severe colitis or diarrhea after ICI resumption was seen in 34.4% of controls compared with 20.8% of patients receiving concurrent SIT. Concurrent SIT was associated with reduced risk of severe irEC recurrence after ICI resumption in a multivariate logistic regression model (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92; p=0.034). There was no difference in survival outcomes between patients in the control group and patients concurrently treated with SIT.

CONCLUSION

After resolution of irEC symptoms, reinitiation of ICI with concurrent SIT is safe, reduces severe irEC recurrence, and has no negative impact on survival outcomes.

Real-world Outcomes of Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab Combination Therapy in a Nation-wide Cohort of Advanced Melanoma Patients in the Netherlands

In phase III trials, ipilimumab plus nivolumab combination therapy is highly efficacious for advanced melanoma, despite many treatment-related grades 3-4 adverse events. Here, we report real-world safety and survival outcomes of ipilimumab plus nivolumab for advanced melanoma. Patients with advanced melanoma who received first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2021 were selected from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. We evaluated response status at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. OS and PFS were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Separate analyses were performed for patients with or without brain metastases and for patients who met the inclusion criteria of the Checkmate-067 trial. In total, 709 patients received first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Three hundred sixty (50.7%) patients experienced grade 3-4 adverse events, with 211 of the (58.6%) patients requiring hospital admission. The median treatment duration was 42 days (IQR = 31-139). At 24 months, disease control was achieved in 37% of patients. Median PFS since the start of treatment was 6.6 months (95% CI: 5.3-8.7), and median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI: 20.7-42.2). CheckMate-067 trial-like patients had a 4-year OS of 50% (95% CI: 43-59). Among patients with no asymptomatic or symptomatic brain metastases, the 4-year OS probabilities were 48% (95% CI: 41-55), 45% (95% CI: 35-57), and 32% (95% CI: 23-46). Ipilimumab plus nivolumab can achieve long-term survival in advanced melanoma patients in a real-world setting, including patients not represented in the CheckMate-067 trial. However, the proportion of patients with disease control in the real world is lower compared with clinical trials.