Multiparametric Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis to Select Targeted Therapies for Breast Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

Liquid biopsies may act as a dynamic tool for identification of targets for precision therapy while circumventing limitations of tissue biopsies. In opposite to most liquid biopsy-related studies that analyze limited patient material for only one parameter, this study is based on a longitudinal and multiparametric analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). A metastatic breast cancer patient was followed over a period of three years and analyses of the genome, RNA profiling, and in vitro drug testing on cultured CTCs were performed in a unique manner. We show that combining the strengths of multiple technologies for analysis yielded maximum information on the ongoing disease and, eventually, allowed choosing an effective therapy, which led to a massive reduction in CTC numbers. This approach provides a concept for future detailed longitudinal and multiparametric CTC analyses.

Abstract

Background: The analysis of liquid biopsies, e.g., circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is an appealing diagnostic concept for targeted therapy selection. In this proof-of-concept study, we aimed to perform multiparametric analyses of CTCs to select targeted therapies for metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: First, CTCs of five metastatic breast cancer patients were analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES). Based on the results, one patient was selected and monitored by longitudinal and multiparametric liquid biopsy analyses over more than three years, including WES, RNA profiling, and in vitro drug testing of CTCs. Results: Mutations addressable by targeted therapies were detected in all patients, including mutations that were not detected in biopsies of the primary tumor. For the index patient, the clonal evolution of the tumor cells was retraced and resistance mechanisms were identified. The AKT1 E17K mutation was uncovered as the driver of the metastatic process. Drug testing on the patient’s CTCs confirmed the efficacy of drugs targeting the AKT1 pathway. During a targeted therapy chosen based on the CTC characterization and including the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, CTC numbers dropped by 97.3% and the disease remained stable as determined by computer tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusion: These results illustrate the strength of a multiparametric CTC analysis to choose and validate targeted therapies to optimize cancer treatment in the future. Furthermore, from a scientific point of view, such studies promote the understanding of the biology of CTCs during different treatment regimens.

Circulating Biomarkers in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer management has progressed immensely over the decades, but the disease is still a major source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Even with enhanced imaging detection and tissue biopsy capabilities, disease can progress on an ineffective treatment before additional information is obtained through standard methods of response evaluation, including the RECIST 1.1 criteria, widely used for assessment of treatment response and benefit from therapy.⁶ Circulating biomarkers have the potential to provide valuable insight into disease progression and response to therapy, and they can serve to identify actionable mutations and tumor characteristics that can direct therapy. These biomarkers can be collected at higher frequencies than imaging or tissue sampling, potentially allowing for more informed management. This review will evaluate the roles of circulating biomarkers in breast cancer, including the serum markers Carcinoembryonic antigen CA15-3, CA27-29, HER2 ECD, and investigatory markers such as GP88; and the components of the liquid biopsy, including circulating tumor cells, cell free DNA/DNA methylation, circulating tumor DNA, and circulating microRNA.

ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

In metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations are a common cause of acquired resistance to the backbone of therapy, estrogen deprivation by aromatase inhibition. How these mutations affect tumor sensitivity to established and novel therapies are active areas of research. These therapies include estrogen receptor-targeting agents, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators, covalent antagonists, and degraders (including tamoxifen, fulvestrant, and novel agents), and combination therapies, such as endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6, PI3K, or mTORC1 inhibition. In this review, we summarize existing knowledge surrounding the mechanisms of action of ESR1 mutations and roles in resistance to aromatase inhibition. We then analyze the recent literature on how ESR1 mutations affect outcomes in estrogen receptor-targeting and combination therapies. For estrogen receptor-targeting therapies such as tamoxifen and fulvestrant, ESR1 mutations cause relative resistance in vitro but do not clearly lead to resistance in patients, making novel agents in this category promising. Regarding combination therapies, ESR1 mutations nullify any aromatase inhibitor component of the combination. Thus, combinations using endocrine alternatives to aromatase inhibition, or combinations where the non-endocrine component is efficacious as monotherapy, are still effective against ESR1 mutations. These results emphasize the importance of investigating combinatorial resistance, challenging as these efforts are. We also discuss future directions and open questions, such as studying the differences among distinct ESR1 mutations, asking how to adjust clinical decisions based on molecular surveillance testing, and developing novel therapies that are effective against ESR1 mutations.

[18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/CT to Assess the Early Metabolic Response in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Metastasized Breast Cancer Treated with Cyclin-Dependent 4/6 Kinase Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Addition of cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase (CDK4/6) inhibitors to endocrine therapy is standard of care in the treatment of women with advanced hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. However, the predictive factors for the treatment response to CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy are poorly elucidated. Early changes in the by [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) uptake of tumors receiving different kinds of therapy have proven to reliably predict treatment outcomes in a variety of malignancies. Therefore, the feasibility of early metabolic response assessment to predict the long-term treatment response to CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy was evaluated in the present study.

METHODS

Eight patients underwent FDG-PET/CT before and after the initiation of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy (ribociclib, palbociclib or abemcaciclib). CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy was combined with either aromatase inhibition or fulvestrant. The median interval between the treatment start (including baseline PET) and the follow-up PET examination was 14 days. Conventional radiographic staging was performed 3 months after the start of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. The percentual changes in molecular tumor volume, SUVpeak, the summed SUVpeak of up to 5 metastases (PERCIST-5), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated for each patient.

RESULTS

Three patients showed progressive disease after 3 months of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, whereas 5 patients showed disease control (3 stable disease and 2 partial remission). Disease control was maintained in these patients (follow-up range 7-22 months). Patients with disease control had a significantly greater decline in TLG (-55.3 vs. 16.7%; p < 0.05). The same was true for the PERCIST-5 (-21.9 vs. 11.3%, p < 0.05). All patients with progressive TLG showed treatment failure and/or a poor outcome.

CONCLUSION

Elevated TLG on early FDG-PET seems to be associated with long-term treatment failure and a poor outcome in patients undergoing CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Early findings indicate a potential prognostic value of early FDG-PET in this setting and warrant a prospective evaluation.

Breast cancer, screening and diagnostic tools: All you need to know

Breast cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies among women worldwide. Methods for screening and diagnosis allow health care professionals to provide personalized treatments that improve the outcome and survival. Scientists and physicians are working side-by-side to develop evidence-based guidelines and equipment to detect cancer earlier. However, the lack of comprehensive interdisciplinary information and understanding between biomedical, medical, and technology professionals makes innovation of new screening and diagnosis tools difficult. This critical review gathers, for the first time, information concerning normal breast and cancer biology, established and emerging methods for screening and diagnosis, staging and grading, molecular and genetic biomarkers. Our purpose is to address key interdisciplinary information about these methods for physicians and scientists. Only the multidisciplinary interaction and communication between scientists, health care professionals, technical experts and patients will lead to the development of better detection tools and methods for an improved screening and early diagnosis.

Genomic Alteration in Metastatic Breast Cancer and Its Treatment

Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains responsible for the majority of breast cancer deaths. Whereas clinical outcomes have improved with the development of novel therapies, resistance almost inevitably develops, indicating the need for novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of mBC. Recent investigations into mBC genomic alterations have revealed novel and potential therapeutic targets. Most notably, therapies against PIK3CA mutation and germline BRCA1/2 mutations have solidified the role of targeted therapy in mBC, with treatments against these alterations now approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the basis of clinical benefit for patients with mBC. Familiarity with relevant genomic alterations in mBC, technologies for mutation detection, methods of interpreting genomic alterations, and an understanding of their clinical impact will aid practicing clinicians in the treatment of mBC as the field of breast oncology moves toward the era of precision medicine.

The Emerging Role of ESR1 Mutations in Luminal Breast Cancer as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker of Response to Endocrine Therapy

Mutations in the hotspot ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor (ER) gene ESR1 have recently been recognized as mechanisms of endocrine resistance in endocrine receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Accumulating data suggest these mutations develop under the selective pressure of endocrine treatments, and are infrequent in untreated ER-positive breast cancers. In vitro studies show that these mutations confer ligand-independent activity, resistance to estrogen deprivation, and relative resistance to tamoxifen and fulvestrant. Post-hoc retrospective and prospective analyses of ESR1 mutations in patients with MBC have consistently found that these mutations are markers of poor prognosis and predict resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs). These results warrant further investigation and prospective validation in dedicated studies. Moreover, studies are ongoing to clarify the activity of novel drugs in the context of metastatic endocrine resistant luminal breast cancer harboring ESR1 mutations. In this review, we summarize the pre-clinical and clinical findings defining the characteristics of ESR1 mutant breast cancer, and highlight the potential clinical developments in this field.

How liquid biopsies can change clinical practice in oncology

Cell-free DNA fragments are shed into the bloodstream by tumor cells. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), commonly known as liquid biopsy, can be exploited for a variety of clinical applications. ctDNA is being used to genotype solid cancers non-invasively, to track tumor dynamics and to detect the emergence of drug resistance. In a few settings, liquid biopsies have already entered clinical practice. For example, ctDNA is used to guide treatment in a subset of lung cancers. In this review, we discuss how recent improvements in the sensitivity and accuracy of ctDNA analyses have led to unprecedented advances in this research field. We further consider what is required for the routine deployment of liquid biopsies in the clinical diagnostic space. We pinpoint technical hurdles that liquid biopsies have yet to overcome, including preanalytical and analytical challenges. We foresee how liquid biopsies will transform clinical practice: by complementing (or replacing) imaging to monitor treatment response and by detecting minimal residual disease after surgery with curative intent.