Prognostic Value of Immunohistochemistry-based Subtyping Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-negative Breast Cancer

To assess the predictive and prognostic value of a subtyping method based on immunohistochemistry in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study included patients with TNBC treated with anthracycline- and taxane-based NAC and curative surgery. Immunohistochemical (IHC) subtyping was performed using core needle biopsy specimens before NAC (pre-NAC) and residual tumors after NAC (post-NAC). Logistic regression was performed to identify predictive biomarkers of pathological complete response (pCR). Invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 230 patients were followed up for a median of 59 months. Clinical lymph node status and the pre-NAC subtype were independent predictors of pCR (P=0.006 and 0.005, respectively). The pre-NAC subtype was an independent prognostic factor for long-term survival (iDFS: P < 0.001, DDFS: P=0.010, and OS: P=0.044). Among patients with residual disease (RD) after NAC, approximately 45% of tumors changed their IHC subtype. Furthermore, the post-NAC subtype, but not the pre-NAC subtype, was strongly associated with the survival of patients with RD (iDFS: P < 0.001, DDFS: P=0.005, and OS: P=0.006). The IHC subtype predicted response to NAC and long-term survival in patients with early TNBC. In patients with RD, almost 45% of the tumors changed subtype after NAC. The IHC subtype should be considered when planning additional therapies pre- and post-NAC.

Is the Androgen Receptor a Viable Target in Triple Negative Breast Cancer in 5 Years?

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by high rates of disease recurrence after definitive therapy, and median survival of less than 18 months in the metastatic setting. Systemic therapy options for TNBC consist primarily of cytotoxic chemotherapy-containing regimens, and while recently FDA-approved chemo-immunotherapy combinations and antibody-drug conjugates such as Sacituzumab govitecan have improved clinical outcomes, there remains an unmet need for more effective and less toxic therapies. A subset of TNBC expresses the androgen receptor (AR), a nuclear hormone steroid receptor that activates an androgen-responsive transcriptional program, and gene expression profiling has revealed a TNBC molecular subtype with AR expression and luminal and androgen responsive features. Both preclinical and clinical data suggest biologic similarities between luminal AR (LAR) TNBC and ER+ luminal breast cancer, including lower proliferative activity, relative chemoresistance, and high rates of oncogenic activating mutations in the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway. Preclinical LAR-TNBC models are sensitive to androgen signaling inhibitors (ASIs), and particularly given the availability of FDA-approved ASIs with robust efficacy in prostate cancer, there has been great interest in targeting this pathway in AR+ TNBC. Here, we review the underlying biology and completed and ongoing androgen-targeted therapy studies in early stage and metastatic AR+ TNBC.

Comprehensive characterization of HER2-low breast cancers: implications in prognosis and treatment

BACKGROUND

HER2-low cancers are heterogeneous with different degrees of HER2 expression and hormone receptor (HR) status. Currently, its analysis is mostly focused on the standard clinic-pathologic features or common biomarkers expression, without considering the heterogeneity within the category. A further characterization and understanding of this cancer subgroup will facilitate its management.

METHODS

A large cohort of HER2-negative cancers (N = 1464) was included. The HER2-low (N = 412) and HER2-zero cancers (N = 1052) were compared and correlated with a comprehensive panel of clinico-pathologic features and biomarker expression according to different HER2 expressions and HR statuses. The prognostic values of these features in HER2-low cancers were also evaluated.

FINDINGS

The characteristics of HER2-low breast cancers, as compared to HER2-zero, varied with the HR status. HER2-low luminal cancers were associated with younger age, larger tumor, high pAKT and high HLA expression. Among TNBCs, opposite trends in age and tumor size were found. Additionally, HER2-low TNBC showed less necrosis, higher pN, lower c-kit and CK14 than HER2-zero cancers. Nonetheless, regardless of HR status, HER2-low status was associated with increased COX2 and AR expression, implicated in the biology of HER2-low cancers. HER2-low cancers showed high expression of HLAs in tumors and PD-L1 in immune cells. In particular, the co-expression of HLAs was found to be associated with better survival in HER2-low cancers.

INTERPRETATION

This study revealed further characteristic of HER2-low breast cancers as compared to HER2-zero cancers, provided further insights into its prognostication and therapeutic strategies.

FUNDING

Health and Medical Research Fund (08190586), Cheng Yue Pui Charity Foundation and CUHK direct grant.

Modulating the Activity of Androgen Receptor for Treating Breast Cancer

The androgen receptor (AR) is a steroid hormone receptor widely detected in breast cancer. Evidence suggests that the AR might be a tumor suppressor in estrogen receptor alpha-positive (ERα+ve) breast cancer but a tumor promoter in estrogen receptor alpha-negative (ERα-ve) breast cancer. Modulating AR activity could be a potential strategy for treating breast cancer. For ERα+ve breast cancer, activation of the AR had been demonstrated to suppress the disease. In contrast, for ERα-ve breast cancer, blocking the AR could confer better prognosis to patients. These studies support the feasibility of utilizing AR modulators as anti-cancer drugs for different subtypes of breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, several issues still need to be addressed, such as the lack of standardization in the determination of AR positivity and the presence of AR splice variants. In future, the inclusion of the AR status in the breast cancer report at the time of diagnosis might help improve disease classification and treatment decision, thereby providing additional treatment strategies for breast cancer.

Adjuvant enzalutamide for the treatment of early-stage androgen-receptor positive, triple-negative breast cancer: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). A subset of TNBCs express the androgen receptor (AR), representing a potential new therapeutic target. This study assessed the feasibility of adjuvant enzalutamide, an AR antagonist, in early-stage, AR-positive (AR +) TNBC.

METHODS

This study was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial in which patients with stage I-III, AR ≥ 1% TNBC who had completed standard-of-care therapy were treated with enzalutamide 160 mg/day orally for 1 year. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of 1 year of adjuvant enzalutamide, defined as the treatment discontinuation rate of enzalutamide due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or other events related to tolerability. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and genomic features of recurrent tumors.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Thirty-five patients completed 1 year of therapy, thereby meeting the prespecified trial endpoint for feasibility. Thirty-two patients elected to continue with an optional second year of treatment. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were uncommon. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year DFS were 94%, 92% , and 80%, respectively. Median OS has not been reached.

CONCLUSION

This clinical trial demonstrates that adjuvant enzalutamide is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen in patients with an early-stage AR + TNBC. Randomized trials in the metastatic setting may inform patient selection through biomarker development; longer follow-up is needed to determine the effect of anti-androgens on DFS and OS in this patient population.

Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: understanding the Daedalian labyrinth and how it could reveal new drug targets

INTRODUCTION

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered the most aggressive breast cancer subtype with the least favorable outcomes. However, recent research efforts have generated an enhanced knowledge of the biology of the disease and have provided a new, more comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted ecosystem that underpins TNBC.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors illustrate the principal biological characteristics of TNBC, the molecular driver alterations, targetable genes, and the biomarkers of immune engagement that have been identified across the subgroups of TNBC. Accordingly, the authors summarize the landscape of the innovative and investigative biomarker-driven therapeutic options in TNBC that emerge from the unique biological basis of the disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The therapeutic setting of TNBC is rapidly evolving. An enriched understanding of the tumor spatial and temporal heterogeneity and the surrounding microenvironment of this complex disease can effectively support the development of novel and tailored opportunities of treatment.

Quadruple-negative breast cancer: novel implications for a new disease

Based on the androgen receptor (AR) expression, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) can be subdivided into AR-positive TNBC and AR-negative TNBC, also known as quadruple-negative breast cancer (QNBC). QNBC characterization and treatment is fraught with many challenges. In QNBC, there is a greater paucity of prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets than AR-positive TNBC. Although the prognostic role of AR in TNBC remains controversial, many studies revealed that a lack of AR expression confers a more aggressive disease course. Literature characterizing QNBC tumor biology and uncovering novel biomarkers for improved management of the disease remains scarce. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the current QNBC landscape and propose avenues for future research, suggesting potential biomarkers and therapeutic strategies that warrant investigation.