Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with CLL using the Australian pharmaceutical benefits scheme (PBS) dataset

This real-world retrospective cohort study using Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% investigated changes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment by line of therapy, time-to-next-treatment, treatment duration, and overall survival (OS). Overall, 803 patients received their first PBS-reimbursed CLL medication between 1 January 2011 to 31 July 2021 (median age: 70 years; 64.6% male), 289 post-1 August 2020. In 2011, most first-line (1 L) prescribing was fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). By 2021, common 1L were chlorambucil ± CD20 (26.1%), Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor (BTKi) (26.1%), and CD20 monotherapy (23.9%). In 2011, relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL treatment was CD20 monotherapy or FCR. By 2021, BTKi (57.7%) and venetoclax ± CD20 (26.1%) were most common. Compared to FCR, 1 L treatment duration (Hazard Ratio) was shorter for CD20 monotherapy (1.7) or chlorambucil ± CD20 (2.5). In R/R CLL, median duration was 24 (ibrutinib) and 19 months (venetoclax). Median OS was 127 months. CLLtreatment pattern shave greatly changed in Australia since the introduction of novel therapies.

Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors with Distinct Binding Modes Reveal Differential Functional Impact on B-Cell Receptor Signaling

Small molecule inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) have been approved for the treatment of multiple B-cell malignancies and are being evaluated for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Various BTK inhibitors (BTKi) have distinct potencies, selectivity profiles, and binding modes within the ATP-binding site. On the basis of the latter feature, BTKis can be classified into those that occupy the back-pocket, H3 pocket, and the hinge region only. Hypothesizing that differing binding modes may have differential impact on the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway, we evaluated the activities of multiple BTKis in B-cell lymphoma models in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrated that, although all three types of BTKis potently inhibited BTK-Y223 autophosphorylation and phospholipase C gamma 2 (PLCγ2)-Y1217 transphosphorylation, hinge-only binders were defective in inhibiting BTK-mediated calcium mobilization upon BCR activation. In addition, PLCγ2 activation was effectively blocked by back-pocket and H3 pocket binders but not by hinge-only binders. Further investigation using TMD8 cells deficient in Rac family small GTPase 2 (RAC2) revealed that RAC2 functioned as a bypass mechanism, allowing for residual BCR signaling and PLCγ2 activation when BTK kinase activity was fully inhibited by the hinge-only binders. These data reveal a kinase activity-independent function of BTK, involving RAC2 in transducing BCR signaling events, and provide mechanistic rationale for the selection of clinical candidates for B-cell lymphoma indications.

Genetic Predictors of Ibrutinib-related Cardiovascular Side Effects in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

PURPOSE

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with ibrutinib are at risk of developing cardiovascular side effects (CVSE). The molecular determinants of CVSEs have not been fully elucidated. We interrogated genetic polymorphisms in the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) signaling pathway for their association with ibrutinib-related CVSEs.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective/prospective observational pharmacogenetic study of 50 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed CLL who received ibrutinib at a starting daily dose of 420 mg for at least 6 months. CVSEs, primarily atrial fibrillation and hypertension, occurred in 10 patients (20%), of whom 4 discontinued therapy. DNA was isolated from buccal swabs of all 50 patients and genotyped for 40 SNPs in GATA4, SGK1, KCNQ1, KCNA4, NPPA, and SCN5A using a customized next-generation sequencing panel. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine genetic and clinical factors associated with the incidence of ibrutinib-related CVSEs.

RESULTS

GATA4 rs804280 AA (P = 0.043), KCNQ1 rs163182 GG (P = 0.036), and KCNQ1 rs2237895 AA (P = 0.023) genotypes were univariately associated with ibrutinib-related CVSEs. On the basis of multivariate analysis, a high genetic risk score, defined as the presence of at least two of these genotypes, was associated with 11.5-fold increased odds of CVSEs (P = 0.019; 95% confidence interval, 1.79-119.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest possible genetic determinants of ibrutinib-related CVSEs in CLL. If replicated in a larger study, pretreatment pharmacogenetic testing for GATA4 and KCNQ1 polymorphisms may be a useful clinical tool for personalizing treatment selection for CLL and/or instituting early risk mitigation strategies.

B-cell Receptor Pathway Mutations Are Infrequent in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia on Continuous Ibrutinib Therapy

PURPOSE

Acquired mutations in Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) or phospholipase C-γ2 (PLCG2) genes are associated with clinical progressive disease (PD) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with BTK inhibitors. Data on mutation rates in patients without PD on ibrutinib treatment are limited.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We evaluated frequency and time to detection of BTK and PLCG2 mutations in peripheral blood samples from 388 patients with previously untreated (n = 238) or relapsed/refractory (n = 150) CLL across five clinical trials.

RESULTS

With median follow-up of 35 months (range, 0-72) without PD at last sampling, mutations in BTK (3%), PLCG2 (2%), or both genes (1%) were rare in previously untreated patients. With median follow-up of 35 months (range, 1-70) without PD at last sample, mutations in BTK (30%), PLCG2 (7%), or both genes (5%) were more common in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Median time to first detection of BTK C481S mutation was not reached in previously untreated patients and was >5 years in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Among patients evaluable at PD, previously untreated patients (n = 12) had lower rates than those with relapsed/refractory disease (n = 45) of BTK (25% vs. 49%) and PLCG2 mutations (8% vs. 13%). Time from first detection of BTK C481S mutation to PD was 11.3 months in 1 previously untreated patient and median 8.5 months (range, 0-35.7) among 23 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic investigation describes development of mutations over time in patients without PD and informs the potential clinical opportunity to optimize ongoing benefits for such patients.

Sequencing and combination of current small-molecule inhibitors for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Where is the evidence?

Small-molecule inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a landscape once dominated by chemoimmunotherapy (i.e., an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in combination with systemic chemotherapy) in fit and unfit individuals. Key challenges include the management of refractory disease as well as the optimization of the therapy sequence. Decreased responsiveness has been observed with prolonged treatment, especially with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors which are given continuously, while venetoclax, an agent that targets dysregulations in intrinsic apoptosis signaling, has a fixed duration when combined with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies or BTK inhibitors. Combination therapy aims to synergistically target different oncogenic signaling pathways to abrogate the proliferation of resistant clones and thereby allows for fixed-duration treatments. An advantage of fixed-duration therapy is the potential to decrease financial and drug-induced toxicities. Sequencing of therapies is important to individualize treatment decisions based on factors such as age, comorbidities, tolerability, and patient preferences. However, to date, there are limited data to guide the rational sequencing or combination of these therapies, since conventional chemoimmunotherapy or chemotherapy regimens were used as comparators against these small-molecule inhibitors in trials that led to their regulatory approvals. In this article, we examined and evaluated the current evidence for sequencing versus the combination of small-molecule inhibitors for CLL by conducting comprehensive searches of the United States National Library of Medicine PubMed database, key meeting abstracts, and clinical practice guidelines. We also summarized findings from expert opinions to elucidate best practices for clinical scenarios with limited evidence to guide treatment selection.

Ibrutinib for First-Line Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Results From the Randomized Phase III iNTEGRATE Study

PURPOSE

To present primary and final analyses from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III iNTEGRATE study, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib with prednisone in previously untreated patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD).

METHODS

Patients (age ≥ 12 years) with newly diagnosed moderate or severe cGVHD, requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy, and with no prior systemic treatment for cGVHD were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ibrutinib 420 mg once daily plus prednisone, starting at 1 mg/kg once daily or placebo plus prednisone. The primary end point was response rate at 48 weeks according to 2014 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project Criteria. Other end points included event-free survival, duration of response, time to withdrawal of immunosuppressants, improvement in Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale score, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Ninety-five and 98 patients enrolled in the ibrutinib-prednisone and placebo-prednisone arms, respectively. At 48 weeks, response rates were 41% (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 37% (placebo-prednisone; P = .54). At 33 months of follow-up, median duration of response was 19 months (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 10 months (placebo-prednisone; P = .10). Median event-free survival was 15 months (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 8 months (placebo-prednisone; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.1; P = .11). Improvement in overall Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale was 43% (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 31% (placebo-ibrutinib; P = .07). Median OS was not reached in either arm. The 24-month Kaplan-Meier OS estimates were 80% for both arms (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.90). Grade ≥ 3 serious adverse events occurred in 49% (ibrutinib-prednisone) and 47% (placebo-prednisone) of patients.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistical difference observed in the primary and secondary end points with ibrutinib-prednisone treatment. No new safety signals were observed with ibrutinib treatment in previously untreated patients with cGVHD. The primary end point of iNTEGRATE was not met.

Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Effectiveness Results Data for First-Line Ibrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ibrutinib, an oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy as a first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in multiple, phase III, randomized clinical trials. This systematic literature review assessed the clinical effectiveness of ibrutinib in the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in real-world clinical settings.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and relevant conference websites were searched for articles published in the USA from 1 January, 2014 to 30 June, 2020. Overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate, and time to next treatment were summarized.

RESULTS

This analysis included a total of 12 publications representing data from 112 to 2033 patients from community and academic centers, and the multicenter informCLL registry. Patients were predominantly male (60-99%) with a median age range from 62 to 77 years, and included those with high-risk genomic features (del[17p]: 21-33%; del[11q]: 33%; and unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene: 59%). Real-world effectiveness with ibrutinib complemented the efficacy demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. Across various studies, the 12-month overall survival rates ranged from 95% to 96%; 18-month overall survival rates were similarly high (91%). Twelve-month progression-free survival rates ranged from 89% to 93%, and the overall response rate ranged from 71% to 90% across four studies. In the studies that reported time to next treatment, 91% and 87% of patients treated with first-line ibrutinib did not initiate new treatment at 12 months and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic literature review confirms the benefit of ibrutinib as a first-line treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in real-world clinical settings and is consistent with results from randomized clinical trials, including in patients with high-risk genomic features.

Practical management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with acalabrutinib

Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been transformed in the past two decades. The introduction of targeted therapies has improved patient outcomes and the deliverability of effective therapies. Making the best use of the next wave of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors requires an understanding of the nuances that separate the drugs in this class of agents. This paper reviews the newer BTK inhibitors and provides practical guidance on the management of CLL using acalabrutinib. Acalabrutinib is a safe and efficacious BTKi in the treatment of CLL. While some side effects appear to be an "on-target" effect of BTK inhibition, the selectivity of second-generation covalent BTK inhibitors such as acalabrutinib may result in a favorable safety profile due to less off-target kinase inhibition. Acalabrutinib represents a well-tolerated and effective alternative to ibrutinib in the management of CLL.

Approach to a patient with "double refractory" chronic lymphocytic leukemia: "Double, double toil and trouble" (Shakespeare)

As patients continue to live longer with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, it has become evident that there is an unmet treatment need for patients who have progressed on multiple lines of therapy. In this article, we attempt to define the "double refractory" patient as resistant to both Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and venetoclax for which prognosis is poor and there remains no standard of care. We further examine the mechanism of resistance to these targeted agents and discuss the current landscape for managing this patient population. Finally, we explore data supporting promising new agents, including non-covalent BTKi, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and additional classes of agents currently in development.

Adding Umbralisib and Ublituximab (U2) to Ibrutinib in Patients with CLL: A Phase II Study of an MRD-Driven Approach

PURPOSE

Ibrutinib has transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), though its use is limited by toxicity and resistance. In this study, we utilized an "add on" approach for patients who had been treated with ibrutinib in the front-line or relapsed/refractory settings with detectable MRD. Umbralisib and ublituximab (U2) were added on to ibrutinib, patients were treated until achieving undetectable-MRD (U-MRD), and then they entered a period of treatment-free observation (TFO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were eligible if they received ibrutinib in any line of therapy for at least 6 months and had detectable MRD (flow cytometry, <1 cell in 10-4 cutoff for U-MRD). U2 was added to ibrutinib, and patients were monitored serially for MRD. Once U-MRD was achieved or a total of 24 cycles were administered, patients entered a period of TFO. The primary study objective was rate of U-MRD. Secondary endpoints included safety and durability of clinical benefit after treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled of whom 27 were evaluable for efficacy. Patients received ibrutinib for a median of 21 months (range 7-67) prior to study enrollment. Fourteen patients (52%) have achieved U-MRD per protocol whereas 78% had at least one U-MRD evaluation. Seventeen patients (63%) have entered TFO after a median of 6.4 months on triplet therapy. Progression-free survival at 12 months was estimated at 95%. Grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension 7%, diarrhea 4%, and increased ALT/AST 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

This triplet approach utilizes the addition of U2 to ibrutinib as an MRD-driven time-limited therapy. This therapy was well tolerated and effective. TFO following this therapy appears durable in ongoing follow-up.

First-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab: final analysis of the randomized, phase III iLLUMINATE trial

iLLUMINATE is a randomized, open-label phase III study of ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab (n=113) versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (n=116) as first-line therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥65 years, or <65 years with coexisting conditions. Patients received oral ibrutinib 420 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or six cycles of oral chlorambucil, each in combination with six cycles of intravenous obinutuzumab. After a median follow-up of 45 months (range, 0.2-52), median progression-free survival continued to be significantly longer in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab arm than in the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm (median not reached versus 22 months; hazard ratio=0.25; 95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.39; P<0.0001). The best overall rate of undetectable minimal residual disease (<0.01% by flow cytometry) remained higher with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab (38%) than with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (25%). With a median treatment duration of 42 months, 13 months longer than the primary analysis, no new safety signals were identified for ibrutinib. As is typical for ibrutinib-based regimens, common grade ≥3 adverse events were most prevalent in the first 6 months of ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab treatment and generally decreased over time, except for hypertension. In this final analysis with up to 52 months of follow-up (median 45 months), ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab showed sustained clinical benefit, in terms of progression- free survival, in first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, including in patients with high-risk features. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02264574.

Selecting the optimal BTK inhibitor therapy in CLL: rationale and practical considerations

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have dramatically changed the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved BTK inhibitors that have all demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared with chemoimmunotherapy. The efficacy of these agents compared to one another is under study; however, current data suggest they provide similar efficacy. Selectivity for BTK confers different adverse effect profiles, and longer follow-up and real-world use have characterized side effects over time. The choice of BTK inhibitor is largely patient-specific, and this review aims to highlight the differences among the agents and guide the choice of BTK inhibitor in clinical practice.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Management of Most Difficult Cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Relapse After Both BTK and BCL2 Inhibition and Richter Transformation

The introduction of targeted therapies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has ushered in a new era in which patients achieve better control of their disease, survive longer, and experience fewer toxicities than before. Despite this progress, a subgroup of patients with CLL will develop resistance to both Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors. In addition, a subgroup of CLL cases will transform into aggressive lymphoma - called Richter transformation - either before or during targeted therapy. These two subgroups of patients have a poor prognosis, and available therapies lead to long-term remission in only a minority of patients. In this paper, two cases are presented that are reflective of these difficult scenarios. In the first case, a patient with CLL, complex karyotype, del 17p, and a mutation in TP53 experiences progression after ibrutinib, venetoclax, bendamustine, rituximab, and idelalisib. In the second case, a patient with CLL and del 17p develops a Richter transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after treatment with obinutuzumab, chlorambucil, ibrutinib, venetoclax, and idelalisib. The aggressive lymphoma is refractory to chemoimmunotherapy, and she expires. The literature pertaining to these two scenarios is reviewed, including the role of available targeted therapies, chemoimmunotherapy, and hematopoietic cell transplantation. Emerging novel therapies, including reversible BTK inhibitors and CAR T cell therapy, are discussed.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Version 3.2022

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has significantly evolved in recent years. Targeted therapy with Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors has emerged as an effective chemotherapy-free option for patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. Undetectable minimal residual disease after the end of treatment is emerging as an important predictor of progression-free and overall survival for patients treated with fixed-duration BCL-2 inhibitor-based treatment. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the updates to the NCCN Guidelines for CLL/SLL specific to the use of chemotherapy-free treatment options for patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory disease.

Optimizing Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Tremendous progress has been made in the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) over the past few decades, starting with the development of glucocorticoids and alkylating agents, moving to combination chemotherapy, and then to chemoimmunotherapy. More recently, the advent of targeted agents has led to significant improvements in overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life. Most patients with R/R CLL and SLL are now treated with 1 of 5 approved targeted therapies rather than chemoimmunotherapy as standard of care. There are 2 main chemotherapy-free approaches in the R/R setting: Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibition and venetoclax-based therapy. Treatment after disease progression on first-line therapy depends on the initial choice of therapy, reason for discontinuation of prior lines of therapy, and available options.

Real-world management of targeted therapies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

The advent of novel targeted therapies, including B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors, has substantially changed the treatment paradigm for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although targeted therapies have improved outcomes compared to traditional chemoimmunotherapy in the front-line and relapsed or refractory settings, they are associated with resistance mutations and suboptimal outcomes in certain high-risk patients. Additionally, targeted therapies are associated with drug interactions and unique adverse effect profiles which can be challenging for patients and clinicians to manage. Ongoing studies continue to address questions regarding optimal sequencing of therapies, the role of treatment combinations, and the efficacy of next-generation novel agents. This review provides a comprehensive overview regarding the clinical management of targeted therapies for CLL and applies current literature to clinical practice.

Current Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: The Diminishing Role of Chemoimmunotherapy

In this review, we examine the literature supporting treatment decision making in the front-line and relapsed/refractory settings for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In the front-line setting, novel-agent-based approaches, including continuous Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor-based therapy and time-limited venetoclax with obinutuzumab, have demonstrated survival benefit over chemoimmunotherapy. While novel-agent-based front-line approaches are appropriate for most patients, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) remains a consideration for a selected population of young patients with immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV)-mutated disease because of the possibility of a prolonged remission following FCR. As front-line novel-agent-based approaches have not been compared directly, decision making regarding which novel-agent-based approach to use in the front-line setting is often based on comorbidities and shared decision making. In the relapsed/refractory setting, BTK inhibitors, venetoclax-based therapy, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors have demonstrated survival benefit when compared with chemoimmunotherapy regimens. Data to support various treatment sequences are limited, which highlights the need for prospective data to examine the optimal treatment sequence. Finally, we examine therapies with combinations of novel agents, and novel agents in development, including covalent and noncovalent BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors, immunotherapies, and cellular therapies. With effective approved options and new agents in development, the role of chemoimmunotherapy in the management of CLL has diminished.