Primary Tumor Resection in Colorectal Cancer With Synchronous Unresectable Metastasis: Time to End the Debate?

Primary Tumor Resection Plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone for Colorectal Cancer Patients with Synchronous Bone Metastasis

Background and Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) bone metastasis (BM), particularly synchronous metastasis, is infrequent and has a poor prognosis. Radical surgery for CRC with BM is challenging, and chemotherapy is the standard treatment. However, it is unclear whether combining chemotherapy with primary tumor resection (PTR) yields greater survival benefits than chemotherapy alone, as no relevant reports exist. Material and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database provided data on 1662 CRC patients with bone metastasis between 2010 and 2018, who were divided into two groups: chemotherapy combined with PTR and chemotherapy alone. Survival distributions were compared using the log-rank test, and survival estimates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional multivariate regression analysis was conducted to estimate the survival benefit of chemotherapy combined with PTR while controlling for additional prognostic factors. Results: The chemotherapy only group consisted of 1277 patients (76.8%), while the chemotherapy combined with PTR group contained 385 patients (23.2%). Patients who received chemotherapy combined with PTR had a significantly higher 1-year survival rate (60.7%) and 2-year survival rate (32.7%) compared to those who only received chemotherapy (43.8% and 18.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Independent prognostic factors identified by Cox proportional analysis were age, location of the primary tumor, type of tumor, M stage, metastasectomy and PTR. Patients who received chemotherapy combined with PTR had a significantly improved prognosis (HR 0.586, 95% CI 0.497-0.691, p < 0.0001). All subgroups demonstrated a survival advantage for patients who received chemotherapy in combination with PTR. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with BM from CRC may benefit from chemotherapy combined with PTR. Our analysis also identified age, location of the primary tumor, type of tumor, M stage, metastasectomy, and PTR as independent prognostic risk factors for CRC patients with synchronous BM.

Upfront primary tumor resection versus upfront systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The standard initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains debated. This study investigated whether upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) or upfront systemic therapy (ST) provides better survival outcomes for patients with mCRC.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for studies published at any time from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) utilizing propensity score matching (PSM) or inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were included. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and short-term (60-day) mortality in these studies.

RESULTS

After reviewing 3,626 articles, we identified 10 studies including a total of 48,696 patients. OS differed significantly between the upfront PTR and upfront ST arms (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% CI: 0.57-0.68; p < 0.001). However, a subgroup analysis identified no significant difference in OS in RCTs (HR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.7-1.34; p = 0.83), whereas significant difference in OS occurred between the treatment arms in RCSs with PSM or IPTW (HR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.54-0.64; p < 0.001). Short-term mortality was analyzed in three RCTs, and 60-day mortality differed significantly between the treatment arms (risk ratio [RR] 3.52; 95% CI: 1.23-10.10; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In RCTs, upfront PTR for mCRC did not improve OS and enhanced the risk of 60-day mortality. However, upfront PTR seemed to increase OS in RCSs with PSM or IPTW. Therefore, whether upfront PTR should be used for mCRC remains unclear. Further large RCTs are required.

Survival benefits of primary tumor surgery for synchronous brain metastases: A SEER-based population study with propensity-matched comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence about the prognostic value of primary tumor surgery (PTS) in patients with brain metastatic malignancies is ambiguous and controversial. This study assessed the survival benefits of primary tumor surgery in patients with brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

Adults patients with BMs that originated from lung, breast, kidney, skin, colon, and liver diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the bias between patients with or without PTS. Then the prognostic value of PTS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 32,760 patients with BMs secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), breast cancer, renal cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer, and liver cancer were identified from the database. After PSM at 1:1 ratio, PTS appeared to significantly prolong cause-specific survival (CSS) time for patients with BMs secondary to NSCLC, breast cancer, renal cancer, and colorectal cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60 [0.53-0.68], 0.56 [0.43-0.73], 0.47 [0.37-0.60], and 0.59 [0.37-0.95], respectively, all p < 0.05). Patients with earlier T and N classifications, no extracranial metastasis, and cancer-specific subtypes (adenocarcinoma in NSCLC, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer) may derive more survival benefits from PTS when suffering from BMs.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study supported PTS could provide survival benefits for patients with BMs secondary to NSCLC, breast cancer, renal cancer, and colorectal cancer. More emphasis should be put on PTS of selected patients with BMs.