Amivantamab: Treating EGFR Exon 20-Mutant Cancers With Bispecific Antibody-Mediated Receptor Degradation

Phase 1b trial of anti-EGFR antibody JMT101 and Osimertinib in EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

EGFR exon 20 insertion (20ins)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an uncommon disease with limited therapeutic options and dismal prognosis. Here we report the activity, tolerability, potential mechanisms of response and resistance for dual targeting EGFR 20ins with JMT101 (anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody) plus osimertinib from preclinical models and an open label, multi-center phase 1b trial (NCT04448379). Primary endpoint of the trial is tolerability. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, progression free survival, overall survival, the pharmacokinetic profile of JMT101, occurrence of anti-drug antibodies and correlation between biomarkers and clinical outcomes. A total of 121 patients are enrolled to receive JMT101 plus osimertinib 160 mg. The most common adverse events are rash (76.9%) and diarrhea (63.6%). The confirmed objective response rate is 36.4%. Median progression-free survival is 8.2 months. Median duration of response is unreached. Subgroup analyses were performed by clinicopathological features and prior treatments. In patients with platinum-refractory diseases (n = 53), confirmed objective response rate is 34.0%, median progression-free survival is 9.2 months and median duration of response is 13.3 months. Responses are observed in distinct 20ins variants and intracranial lesions. Intracranial disease control rate is 87.5%. Confirmed intracranial objective response rate is 25%.

Current status and future perspectives of bispecific antibodies in the treatment of lung cancer

ABSTRACT

Monoclonal antibodies have been successfully incorporated into the current therapeutical landscape of lung cancer in the last decades. Recently, with technological advances, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have also shown robust efficacy in the treatment of malignant cancers, including lung cancer. These antibodies target two independent epitopes or antigens and have been extensively explored in translational and clinical studies in lung cancer. Here, we outline the mechanisms of action of bsAbs, related clinical data, ongoing clinical trials, and potent novel compounds of various types of bsAbs in clinical studies, especially in lung cancer. We also propose future directions for the clinical development of bsAbs, which might bring a new era of treatment for patients with lung cancer.

The diverse landscape of dermatologic toxicities of non-immune checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibody-based cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Since their first approval 25 years ago, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become important targeted cancer therapeutics. However, dermatologic toxicities associated with non-immune checkpoint inhibitor (non-ICI) mAbs may complicate the course of cancer treatment. Data on the incidence and types of these reactions are limited.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted on dermatologic toxicities associated with different classes of non-ICI mAbs approved for treatment of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. The review included prospective Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials; retrospective literature reviews; systematic reviews/meta-analyses; and case series/reports.

RESULTS

Dermatologic toxicities were associated with several types of non-ICI mAbs. Inflammatory reactions were the most common dermatologic toxicities, manifesting as maculopapular, urticarial, papulopustular/acneiform, and lichenoid/interface cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) with non-ICI mAbs. Immunobullous reactions were rare and a subset of non-ICI mAbs were associated with the development of vitiligo cAEs.

CONCLUSION

Dermatologic toxicities of non-ICI mAbs are diverse and mostly limited to inflammatory reactions. Awareness of the spectrum of the histopathologic patterns of cAE from non-ICI mAbs therapy is critical in the era of oncodermatology and oncodermatopathology.

Molecular targeted therapy for anticancer treatment

Since the initial clinical approval in the late 1990s and remarkable anticancer effects for certain types of cancer, molecular targeted therapy utilizing small molecule agents or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies acting as signal transduction inhibitors has served as a fundamental backbone in precision medicine for cancer treatment. These approaches are now used clinically as first-line therapy for various types of human cancers. Compared to conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapeutic agents have efficient anticancer effects with fewer side effects. However, the emergence of drug resistance is a major drawback of molecular targeted therapy, and several strategies have been attempted to improve therapeutic efficacy by overcoming such resistance. Herein, we summarize current knowledge regarding several targeted therapeutic agents, including classification, a brief biology of target kinases, mechanisms of action, examples of clinically used targeted therapy, and perspectives for future development.

EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: current status and perspectives

Platinum-based chemotherapy was previously the first-choice treatment for lung cancer. The discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations and the development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) marked the beginning of the targeted therapy era for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty percent of NSCLC patients carry EGFR gene mutations. For these advanced NSCLC patients, EGFR-TKIs are currently preferred for their superior activity and survival benefits over platinum-based chemotherapy. However, therapeutic efficacy is quite different in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations versus common mutations. Patients with ex20ins mutations are insensitive to EGFR-TKIs and have poor prognosis. Some drugs targeting EGFR ex20ins mutations have been approved. Here, we systematically reviewed the recent clinical research of and treatments used for EGFR ex20ins mutations, summarized the latest data on emerging therapies, and discussed future prospects and treatments.

Case Report: Partial Response Following Nivolumab Plus Docetaxel in a Patient With EGFR Exon 20 Deletion/Insertion (p.N771delinsGF) Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Transdifferentiated From Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The histological transformation from lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) to lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and p. N771delinsGF mutations in EGFR exon 20 (ex20) are exceedingly rare in non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). EGFR ex20 mutations are insensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in NSCLC. Here, we present a 76-year-old male smoker harboring LUAD with a novel p. N771delinsGF deletion/insertion mutation in EGFR ex20 transdifferentiating from advanced LUSC after chemoradiotherapy. The patient presented reduced hydrothorax and relieved tightness with the treatment of nivolumab plus docetaxel and carboplatin after the failure of second-line chemotherapy. The case highlights the importance of rebiopsy and molecular retesting after the progression of lung cancer and supports the idea that the combination of immune checkpoint blockade and chemotherapy may be an attractive option for patients with EGFR ex20 mutations associated with LUSC–LUAD transformation.

Case Report: Sequential Combination Targeted Therapy With Type I and II MET Inhibitors in a Metastatic EGFR-Mutated, MET-Amplified NSCLC Patient With Acquired MET Y1230H Mutation

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, most patients will eventually develop resistance. For EGFR-TKI resistance mediated by MET amplification, the combination of EGFR and MET TKIs has shown promising results in early clinical trials. However, acquired resistance to MET inhibitors forms a formidable challenge to this dual blockade approach. Here, we presented an NSCLC patient with EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) who was resistant to first-line erlotinib treatment but responded to chemotherapy. Given the finding of MET overexpression/amplification after disease progression, the patient received gefitinib plus crizotinib with a partial response. Her disease progressed again, and molecular testing revealed a novel MET Y1230H mutation and a PD-L1 TPS score of 75%. She received a salvage regime consisting of gefitinib, cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab with a partial response. Since we now know that EGFR ex19del NSCLC patients generally do not respond to PD-1 blockade therapy, this response is more likely the contribution from gefitinib plus cabozantinib. Therefore, sequential use of type I and II MET inhibitors in EGFR/MET dual blockade may be an effective therapeutic option for EGFR-mutant, MET-amplified NSCLC.