Indications and Parameters Around Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer

Is postoperative radiotherapy effective in patients with completely resected pathologic stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer? High-risk populations should consider it

Background and purpose

We aimed to assess the benefits of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in completely resected patients with pathologic stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a high risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR).

Materials and methods

A prospective, randomized trial was conducted starting in July 2016 to explore the optimal timing of PORT in high-LRR-risk patients with completely resected IIIA(N2) NSCLC (NCT02974426). Patients were identified as high-LRR-risk patients via the prognostic index (PI) model and were randomly assigned to PORT-first or PORT-last treatment. To evaluate PORT for high-LRR-risk patients, all patients in this trial constituted the PORT cohort, whereas high-LRR-risk patients without PORT were selected from a retrospective cohort as the non-PORT cohort. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analyses were conducted to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).

Results

Between 2016 and 2022, 132 patients were included in the trial, with a median follow-up of 49.3 months. The 3-year OS rate was 83.2 %, and the 3-year DFS rate was 35.0 %. Among these patients, 122 patients (92 %) received planned PORT. For 132 intention-to-treat patients, PSM analysis with the non-PORT cohort (n = 307) resulted in 130 matched pairs. The results revealed that PORT improved LRFS (3-year LRFS, 77.6 % vs. 57.3 %; p = 0.00014), DFS (3-year DFS, 35.2 % vs. 28.6 %; p = 0.038), and OS (3-year OS, 83.0 % vs. 60.7 %; p = 0.00017), with no difference in DMFS (p = 0.17).

Conclusion

PORT could increase local control, DFS, and OS in high-LRR-risk patients with completely resected IIIA(N2) NSCLC. Future research should utilize multidimensional data to pinpoint more precise subgroups benefiting from PORT, with prospective trials validating these findings.

Impact of locoregional recurrence versus distant metastasis on overall survival in patients with Non-Small cell lung cancer after Surgery: A secondary analysis of PORT-C RCT

PURPOSE

The therapeutic advantage of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been shown to benefit overall survival (OS) according to two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), albeit an enhancement in locoregional-free survival was observed. We aimed to evaluate the relative influence of locoregional recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM) on OS for patients with NSCLC after surgery.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of PORT-C RCT. Patients with pN2 NSCLC undergoing complete resection followed by chemotherapy were included. A dynamic prediction model was developed to evaluate the impact of LR and DM on OS. The endpoint was OS. Age, sex, smoking history, histology, Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor side, T stage, and positive lymph node were baseline factors, whereas LR and DM status were time-dependent covariates.

RESULTS

In total, 364 patients were eligible, including 214 and 150 in the non-PORT and PORT groups, respectively. DM significantly decreased OS in both the non-PORT (odds ratio [OR], 4.74; 95 % CI, 2.70-8.30; P < 0.01) and PORT (OR, 5.43; 95 % CI, 2.56-11.48; P < 0.01) groups. LR also significantly impacted OS in the non-PORT (OR, 2.09; 95 % CI, 1.12-3.93; P = 0.02) and the PORT (OR, 3.44; 95 % CI, 1.53-7.75; P < 0.01) groups. Multivariate Cox analysis identified the pT stage, positive lymph nodes, and histology as variables correlated with DM. A nomogram was developed to estimate the risk of DM. PORT did not significantly enhance OS in either the low (HR, 1.42; 95 % CI, 0.63-3.19, P = 0.40) or high-risk (HR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.35-1.09, P = 0.10) subgroup but in the medium-risk subgroup (HR, 0.20; 95 % CI, 0.05-0.86, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

DM and LR significantly impacted OS in patients with NSCLC after surgery. DM emerged as the dominant failure pattern, emphasizing more effective control of DM. PORT was beneficial for patients with a medium risk of DM.

Evaluating the impact of cardiac substructure dosimetric parameters on survival in lung cancer patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The association of cardiac dosimetric parameters with survival in lung cancer patients is well established. However, most research has concentrated on patients undergoing definitive treatment. This study aims to investigate the relationship between cardiac dosimetric parameters and survival in patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).

METHODS

Sixty patients who received PORT between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The substructures of the heart were delineated on the simulation computed tomography scans of the patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate the correlation between dosimetric parameters and overall survival. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was utilized for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Right atrium (RA) maximum dose (Dmax) was the only variable that was significantly associated with a shorter OS. Further receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the optimum cut-off value for RA Dmax was 43.6 Gy, with a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 62%. In addition, inclusion of the upper right paratracheal (2R), lower right paratracheal (4R), left pulmonary ligament (9L), and right hilus (10R) lymphatic stations in the treatment field led to an increase in RA Dmax.

CONCLUSION

The results of this retrospective study show that RA Dmax appears to have an impact on overall survival in patients undergoing PORT. Limiting the RA Dmax dose to below 43.6 Gy and avoiding elective nodal irradiation might potentially enhance survival in this patient cohort.

Adjuvant modern radiotherapy in resected pN2 NSCLC patients: results from a multicentre retrospective analysis on acute and late toxicity on behalf of AIRO thoracic oncology study group: the RAC-TAC study

BACKGROUND

Recently, the PORT-C and LUNG-ART trials, which evaluated the role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT), have significantly altered the treatment landscape for NSCLC pN2 patients who previously underwent surgery. In response, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology Thoracic Oncology study group has initiated an observational multicenter trial to assess both acute and late toxicities of PORT in pN2 NSCLC patients treated with modern techniques.

METHODS

Data on NSCLC patients submitted to PORT after radical surgery treated between 2015 and 2020 in six Italian Centers were collected. Heart, lung, and esophageal acute and late toxicities have been retrospectively analyzed and related to radiation therapy dosimetric parameters. Furthermore, loco-regional control, distant metastasis and overall survival have been analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients with a median age of 68 years from six different centers were included in this analysis (142 males and 70 females). Prior to undergoing PORT, 96 patients (45.8%) had a history of heart disease, 110 patients (51.9%) had hypertension, and 51 patients (24%) had COPD. Acute toxicity was observed in 147 patients (69.3%), with lung toxicity occurring in 93 patients (G1 in 70 patients, G2 in 17 patients, and G3 in 4 patients), esophageal toxicity in 114 patients (G1 in 89 patients, G2 in 23 patients, and G3 in 1 patient), and cardiac toxicity in 4 patients (G1 in 2 patients and G3 in 2 patients). Late side effects were found in 60 patients (28.3%), predominantly involving the lungs (51 patients: 32 G1, 11 G2, and 1 G3) and the esophagus (11 patients: 8 G1 and 3 G2), with no reported late cardiac side effects. Various clinical and dosimetric parameters were found to correlate with both acute and chronic toxicities. Over a median follow-up period of 54 months, 48 patients (22.6%) showed locoregional disease relapse, 106 patients (50%) developed distant metastases, and 66 patients (31.1%) died.

CONCLUSIONS

RAC-TAC retrospective multicentric study showed the low toxicity of PORT when advanced technology is used. At the same time, it's noteworthy to underline that 50% of the patients develop distant recurrences in the follow up.

Regulation of tumorigenesis and ferroptosis in non-small cell lung cancer by a novel BBOX1-AS1/miR-326/PROM2 axis

Dysregulation of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is associated with the tumorigenesis and ferroptosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BBOX1 antisense RNA 1 (BBOX1-AS1) functions as an oncogenic driver in NSCLC. Here, we aim to investigate the regulation effect and underlying mechanism of BBOX1-AS1 in NSCLC progression and ferroptosis. RNA expression was detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and protein expression was measured by immunoblotting. Cell growth was assessed by CCK-8 and colony formation assays. Transwell assay was applied to evaluate cell invasion and migration. RNA pull-down and dual-luciferase reporter assays were applied to verify the relationship between miR-326 and BBOX1-AS1 or prominin 2 (PROM2). The role of BBOX1-AS1 in NSCLC tumorigenicity was also analyzed by xenograft assays. Silencing BBOX1-AS1 or PROM2 impeded NSCLC cell growth, migration, and invasion. Silencing BBOX1-AS1 induced cell apoptosis and ferroptosis. BBOX1-AS1 up-regulated PROM2 expression, and re-expression of PROM2 reversed the effects of BBOX1-AS1 depletion on cell malignant phenotypes and ferroptosis. BBOX1-AS1 post-transcriptionally modulated PROM2 expression by sponging miR-326. MiR-326 was validated as a mediator of BBOX1-AS1 in regulating NSCLC cell malignant phenotypes and ferroptosis. Additionally, BBOX1-AS1 deficiency in vivo resulted in the suppression of xenograft tumor growth. Together, our study defines a novel BBOX1-AS1/miR-326/PROM2 axis in regulating NSCLC malignant progression and ferroptosis, offering new evidence for the oncogenic role of BBOX1-AS1 in NSCLC. These findings may provide a basis for the future usage of targeting BBOX1-AS1 in NSCLC treatment.

Dosimetric and NTCP advantages of robust proton therapy over robust VMAT for Stage III NSCLC in the immunotherapy era

AIMS

To assess the robustness and to define the dosimetric and NTCP advantages of pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) compared with VMAT for unresectable Stage III non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) in the immunotherapy era.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

10 patients were re-planned with VMAT and PBSPT using: 1) ITV-based robust optimization with 0.5 cm setup uncertainties and (for PBSPT) 3.5 % range uncertainties on free-breathing CT 2) CTV-based RO including all 4DCTs anatomies. Target coverage (TC), organs at risk dose and TC robustness (TCR), set at V95%, were compared. The NTCP risk for radiation pneumonitis (RP), 24-month mortality (24MM), G2 + acute esophageal toxicity (ET), the dose to the immune system (EDIC) and the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery V15 < 10 % were registered. Wilcoxon test was used.

RESULTS

Both PBSPT methods improved TC and TCR (p < 0.01). The mean lung dose and lung V20 were lower with PBSPT (p < 0.01). Median mean heart dose reduction with PBSPT was 8 Gy (p < 0.001). PT lowered median LAD V15 (p = 0.004). ΔNTCP > 5 % with PBSPT was observed for two patients for RP and for five patients for 24 MM. ΔNTCP for ≥ G2 ET was not in favor of PBSPT for all patients. PBSPT halved median EDIC (4.9/5.1 Gy for ITV/CTV-based VMAT vs 2.3 Gy for both ITV/CTV-based PBSPT, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PBSPT is a robust approach with significant dosimetric and NTCP advantages over VMAT; the EDIC reduction could allow for a better integration with immunotherapy. A clinical benefit for a subset of NSCLC patients is expected.

Preoperative CT-based radiomic prognostic index to predict the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. A subset of patients may benefit from PORT. We aimed to identify patients with NSCLC who could benefit from PORT.

METHODS

Patients from cohorts 1 and 2 with pathological Tany N2 M0 NSCLC were included, as well as patients with non-metastatic NSCLC from cohorts 3 to 6. The radiomic prognostic index (RPI) was developed using radiomic texture features extracted from the primary lung nodule in preoperative chest CT scans in cohort 1 and validated in other cohorts. We employed a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox regularisation model for data dimension reduction, feature selection, and the construction of the RPI. We created a lymph-radiomic prognostic index (LRPI) by combining RPI and positive lymph node number (PLN). We compared the outcomes of patients who received PORT against those who did not in the subgroups determined by the LRPI.

RESULTS

In total, 228, 1003, 144, 422, 19, and 21 patients were eligible in cohorts 1-6. RPI predicted overall survival (OS) in all six cohorts: cohort 1 (HR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.18-4.52), cohort 2 (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.26-2.14), cohort 3 (HR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.45-4.3), cohort 4 (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.52), cohort 5 (HR = 2.56, 95% CI: 0.73-9.02), cohort 6 (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 0.53-10.03). LRPI predicted OS (C-index: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.60-0.75) better than the pT stage (C-index: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50-0.63), pT + PLN (C-index: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.46-0.70), and RPI (C-index: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.75). The LRPI was used to categorize individuals into three risk groups; patients in the moderate-risk group benefited from PORT (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.91; p = 0.02), while patients in the low-risk and high-risk groups did not.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed preoperative CT-based radiomic and lymph-radiomic prognostic indexes capable of predicting OS and the benefits of PORT for patients with NSCLC.

Upregulation of CoQ shifts ferroptosis dependence from GPX4 to FSP1 in acquired radioresistance

Acquired radioresistance is the primary contributor to treatment failure of radiotherapy, with ferroptosis is identified as a significant mechanism underlying cell death during radiotherapy. Although resistance to ferroptosis has been observed in both clinical samples of radioresistant cells and cell models, its mechanism remains unidentified. Herein, our investigation revealed that radioresistant cells exhibited greater tolerance to Glutathione Peroxidase 4 (GPX4) inhibitors and, conversely, increased sensitivity to ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) inhibitors compared to their sensitive counterparts. This observation suggested that FSP1 might play a dominant role in the development of radioresistance. Notably, the knockout of FSP1 demonstrated considerably superior efficacy in resensitizing cells to radiotherapy compared to the knockout of GPX4. To elucidate the driving force behind this functional shift, we conducted a metabolomic assay, which revealed an upregulation of Coenzyme Q (CoQ) synthesis and a downregulation of glutathione synthesis in the acquired radioresistance cells. Mechanistically, CoQ synthesis was found to be supported by aarF domain containing kinase 3-mediated phosphorylation of CoQ synthases, while the downregulation of Solute carrier family 7 member 11 led to decreased glutathione synthesis. Remarkably, our retrospective analysis of clinical response data further validated that the additional administration of statin during radiotherapy, which could impede CoQ production, effectively resensitized radioresistant cells to radiation. In summary, our findings demonstrate a dependency shift from GPX4 to FSP1 driven by altered metabolite synthesis during the acquisition of radioresistance. Moreover, we provide a promising therapeutic strategy for reversing radioresistance by inhibiting the FSP1-CoQ pathway.

Exploring a novel seven-gene marker and mitochondrial gene TMEM38A for predicting cervical cancer radiotherapy sensitivity using machine learning algorithms

Background

Radiotherapy plays a crucial role in the management of Cervical cancer (CC), as the development of resistance by cancer cells to radiotherapeutic interventions is a significant factor contributing to treatment failure in patients. However, the specific mechanisms that contribute to this resistance remain unclear. Currently, molecular targeted therapy, including mitochondrial genes, has emerged as a new approach in treating different types of cancers, gaining significant attention as an area of research in addressing the challenge of radiotherapy resistance in cancer.

Methods

The present study employed a rigorous screening methodology within the TCGA database to identify a cohort of patients diagnosed with CC who had received radiotherapy treatment. The control group consisted of individuals who demonstrated disease stability or progression after undergoing radiotherapy. In contrast, the treatment group consisted of patients who experienced complete or partial remission following radiotherapy. Following this, we identified and examined the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the two cohorts. Subsequently, we conducted additional analyses to refine the set of excluded DEGs by employing the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and random forest techniques. Additionally, a comprehensive analysis was conducted in order to evaluate the potential correlation between the expression of core genes and the extent of immune cell infiltration in patients diagnosed with CC. The mitochondrial-associated genes were obtained from the MITOCARTA 3.0. Finally, the verification of increased expression of the mitochondrial gene TMEM38A in individuals with CC exhibiting sensitivity to radiotherapy was conducted using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry assays.

Results

This process ultimately led to the identification of 7 crucial genes, viz., GJA3, TMEM38A, ID4, CDHR1, SLC10A4, KCNG1, and HMGCS2, which were strongly associated with radiotherapy sensitivity. The enrichment analysis has unveiled a significant association between these 7 crucial genes and prominent signaling pathways, such as the p53 signaling pathway, KRAS signaling pathway, and PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway. By utilizing these 7 core genes, an unsupervised clustering analysis was conducted on patients with CC, resulting in the categorization of patients into three distinct molecular subtypes. In addition, a predictive model for the sensitivity of CC radiotherapy was developed using a neural network approach, utilizing the expression levels of these 7 core genes. Moreover, the CellMiner database was utilized to predict drugs that are closely linked to these 7 core genes, which could potentially act as crucial agents in overcoming radiotherapy resistance in CC.

Conclusion

To summarize, the genes GJA3, TMEM38A, ID4, CDHR1, SLC10A4, KCNG1, and HMGCS2 were found to be closely correlated with the sensitivity of CC to radiotherapy. Notably, TMEM38A, a mitochondrial gene, exhibited the highest degree of correlation, indicating its potential as a crucial biomarker for the modulation of radiotherapy sensitivity in CC.

Role of prognostic nutritional index in postoperative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is known to be correlated with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, its role has not been studied in patients who have undergone postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between PNI and survival and recurrence in NSCLC patients with PORT.

METHODS

We reviewed 97 stage I-III NSCLC patients who received PORT between January 2006 and December 2016 at our institution. We obtained PNI values for both pre-RT (within 1 month before PORT) and post-RT (within 2 months after PORT) by using serum albumin and lymphocyte count. A cutoff value for PNI was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The median follow-up period was 52.8 months.

RESULTS

The ROC curve of post-RT PNI exhibited a higher area under the curve (AUC 0.68, cut-off: 47.1) than that of pre-RT PNI (AUC 0.55, cutoff: 50.3), so the group was divided into high post-RT PNI (> 47.1) and low post-RT PNI ( ≤ 47.1). The five-year overall survival rate (OS) was 66.2% in the high post-RT group, compared with 41.8% in the low post-RT PNI group (p = 0.018). Those with both low pre-RT and low post-RT PNI had the worst five-year OS of 31.1%. Post-RT PNI (HR 0.92, p = 0.003) was an independent risk factor for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

PNI after PORT was significantly associated with survival. This finding suggests that PNI can be used as a prognostic marker.

Predictive Value of Clinicopathological Factors to Guide Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Completely Resected pN2-Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: With the evolution of radiotherapy techniques and a better understanding of clinicopathological factors, we aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) and associated predictive factors in patients with completely resected pN2 stage III non-small cell lung cancer (R0 pN2-stage III NSCLC). Material and Method: The cancer registration database of a single medical center was searched for R0 pN2-stage III NSCLC. Clinicopathological factors and information about post-operative therapies, including PORT and adjuvant systemic treatment, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox regression model were applied for time-to-event analysis, with disease-free survival (DFS) being the primary outcome. Results: From 2010 to 2021, 82 R0 pN2-stage III NSCLC patients were evaluated, with 70.1% of tumors harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFR mut.). PORT was performed in 73.2% of cases, and the median dose was 54 Gy. After a median follow-up of 42 months, the 3-year DFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 40.6% and 77.3%, respectively. Distant metastasis (DM) was the main failure pattern. In the overall cohort, DFS was improved with PORT (3-year DFS: 44.9% vs. 29.8%; HR: 0.552, p = 0.045). Positive predictive factors for PORT benefit, including EGFR mut., negative extranodal extension, positive lymphovascular invasion, 1-3 positive lymph nodes, and a positive-to-dissected lymph node ratio ≤0.22, were recognized. OS improvement was also observed in subgroups with less lymph node burden. Conclusions: For R0 pN2-stage III NSCLC, PORT prolongs DFS and OS in selected patients. Further studies on predictive factors and the development of nomograms guiding the application of PORT are highly warranted, aiming to enhance the personalization of lung cancer treatment.

Higher Lung and Heart Doses Decrease Early and Long-Term Survival, Respectively, in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Radiation

Purpose

Cardiopulmonary toxic effects may reduce the efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have examined whether the heart and lung doses affect overall survival (OS). We investigated the correlation of heart and lung doses with OS in patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT.

Methods and Materials

This retrospective analysis included 307 patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT. The total dose was 50 Gy. Landmark analyses were performed at 36 months, with hazard ratios (HRs) calculated separately for events occurring up to 36 months (early survival) and after 36 months (long-term survival). Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was performed to balance the characteristics of the high- and low-dose groups. We performed sensitivity analyses at 24 and 48 months.

Results

The median follow-up period was 67.42 months. Heart doses were significantly correlated with long-term survival (HR, 1.14; P = .015) but not with early survival (HR, 0.97; P = .41) or whole survival (HR, 1.02; P = .58). Lung doses were marginally significantly correlated with early survival (HR, 1.03; P = .07) but not with long-term survival (HR, 1.00; P = .85) or whole survival (HR, 1.02; P = .12). Higher heart and lung doses were associated with decreased long-term and early survival, respectively, before and after sIPTW. Landmark analyses at 24 and 48 months showed consistent results.

Conclusions

For patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT, a higher heart dose was associated with decreased long-term survival, whereas a higher lung dose was associated with decreased early survival.

Treatment Decisions for Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Balancing Less With More?

For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the outcomes for patients with resectable disease are historically poor compared with other solid organ malignancies. In recent years, there have been significant advances in multidisciplinary care, which have resulted in improved outcomes. Innovations in surgical oncology include the use of limited resection and minimally invasive techniques. Recent data in radiation oncology have suggested refinements in pre- and postoperative radiation therapy, resulting in optimization of techniques in the curative setting. Finally, the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in the advanced setting has paved the way for inclusion in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, resulting in recent regulatory approvals for four regimens (CheckMate-816, IMpower010, PEARLS, ADAURA). In this review, we will provide an overview of the seminal studies informing advancements in optimal surgical resection, radiation treatment, and systemic therapy for resectable NSCLC. We will summarize the key data on survival outcomes, biomarker analyses, and future directions for perioperative studies.

Progress on neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer and potential biomarkers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly concerned in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), represented by inhibitors of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), and inhibitors of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4). The introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment of perioperative NSCLC has improved the prognosis to a great extent, as demonstrated by several phase II and III clinical trials. The target population for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC is still under discussion, and the biomarkers for neoadjuvant immunotherapy population selection are the next pending problem. The predictive efficacy of many potential makers is still being explored, including PD-L1 expression levels, tumor mutation burden, circulating tumor DNA, components of the tumor microenvironment, and several clinical factors. We summarize key findings on the utility of ICIs in clinical trials of preoperative NSCLC patients and conclude analyses of relevant biomarkers to provide a better understanding of potentially predictive biomarkers in neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

[Postoperative radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIA - N2: Focus and perspectives]

Patients with resectable stage IIIA - N2 lung cancer represent a very heterogeneous population with variable risks of postoperative recurrence depending on the type of N2 involvement (unisite N2, multisite N2, bulky N2, extra-capsular rupture, incomplete resection…). This heterogeneity associated with the difficulty of carrying out prospective randomized studies with sufficient power in stages IIIA - 2, results in the absence of clear and consensual recommendations (except for stages IIIA - N2 resectable R0, since LungART and PORT-C studies). The objective of this article is to make an update on the place of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of stages IIIA - N2 following the publication of two recent randomized trials (PORT-C and LungART) but also compare them fort a better understanding of the current issues raised by these first published results. Indeed, these two trials do not find any benefit in terms of progression free survival and overall survival of postoperative radiotherapy but exploratory analyzes from these two studies seem to show a potential benefit of postoperative in some pN2 populations at high risk of locoregional recurrence (N2 multisite, N2 bulky…). In addition, the advent of immunotherapy (atezolizumab or pembrolizumab) and targeted therapies (osimertinib) in the adjuvant situation are redebating the place of a possible indication for postoperative radiotherapy in stage IIIA - 2.

The Value of Radiotherapy in Patients With Resectable Stage IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Individualized Treatment: A Population-Based Analysis

INTRODUCTION

No consensus has been achieved on the benefit of radiotherapy for resected stage IIIA NSCLC patients. The division of stage IIIA has changed significantly in 2017. This study aims to explore the effects of radiotherapy on the survival of patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC in the new era.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 2010 and 2018 were identified in the 8th edition TNM classification from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A nomogram was developed by integrating all independent predictors for lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). The Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and subgroup analysis were applied to mitigate potential bias. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2632 stage IIIA NSCLC patients were enrolled. The C-index of the nomogram for the prediction of LCSS was 0.636 (95% CI, 0.616-0.656). In the group of patients with N2 stage who featured more than 5 positive regional lymph nodes, compared with non-PORT, PORT did prolong postoperative survival time (50 vs. 31 months; P= .005). N2 patients with visceral pleural invasion (VPI), older (age >65), or had a larger tumor (size >3 cm) could also benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment protocol for stage IIIA NSCLC patients should be individualized. Based on our findings, N2 patients with more than 5 positive regional lymph nodes, VPI, larger tumor size (greater than 3 cm), and older (age above 65) could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Further well-designed randomized trials are warranted.

Current challenges of unresectable stage III NSCLC: are we ready to break the glass ceiling of the PACIFIC trial?

Consolidation anti-programmed death-ligand 1 has become a new standard of care in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following chemo-radiotherapy (CTRT), based on the results of two phase III trials. Advances remain however needed, in particular to reduce the risk of distant relapse and for treatment personalization. Newer strategies are currently being tested, including consolidation with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), concurrent chemo-radioimmunotherapy and (chemo)-immunotherapy induction before CTRT. One randomized phase II reported better outcomes with a double ICI consolidation as compared with durvalumab alone. Three nonrandomized phase II trials also suggested that concurrent ICI-CTRT was feasible. Within this review, we summarize the current evidence, highlight ongoing trials and discuss challenges that will ideally lead to a cure for more patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.