Updated Overall Survival and Exploratory Analysis From Randomized, Phase II EVAN Study of Erlotinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Adjuvant Therapy in Stage IIIA Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor+ Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Surgically resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer: a contemporary approach

New treatment paradigms for resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with an emphasis on personalised care and a multidisciplinary approach, have significantly improved patient outcomes. The incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors into neoadjuvant, perioperative and adjuvant treatment algorithms is reshaping the standard of care for resectable NSCLC. Adjuvant targeted therapy trials have also paved the way for a much-needed personalised approach for patients with actionable genomic alterations. Innovative surgical techniques and judicious use of postoperative radiotherapy may mitigate the toxicity associated with a multimodality approach. Amid the many new treatment options, questions remain about the best approach to consider for each patient. Measurement of minimal residual disease and achievement of pathological complete response are emerging biomarkers of interest to help further refine treatment selection. This review summarises the current management of resectable NSCLC, focusing on ongoing and recent advances in surgical approaches, the role of postoperative radiotherapy and the rapidly changing field of systemic therapies.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Early Stage Resectable NSCLC: Consensus Recommendations From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Advances in the multidisciplinary care of early stage resectable NSCLC (rNSCLC) are emerging at an unprecedented pace. Numerous phase 3 trials produced results that have transformed patient outcomes for the better, yet these findings also require important modifications to the patient treatment journey trajectory and reorganization of care pathways. Perhaps, most notably, the need for multispecialty collaboration for this patient population has never been greater. These rapid advances have inevitably left us with important gaps in knowledge for which definitive answers will only become available in several years. To this end, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer commissioned a diverse multidisciplinary international expert panel to evaluate the current landscape and provide diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic recommendations for patients with rNSCLC, with particular emphasis on patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer-Union for International Cancer Control TNM eighth edition stages II and III disease. Using a team-based approach, we generated 19 recommendations, of which all but one achieved greater than 85% consensus among panel members. A public voting process was initiated, which successfully validated and provided qualitative nuance to our recommendations. Highlights include the following: (1) the critical importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation of patients with rNSCLC driven by shared clinical decision-making of a multispecialty team of expert providers; (2) biomarker testing for rNSCLC; (3) a preference for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage III rNSCLC; (4) equipoise regarding the optimal management of patients with stage II between upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant or perioperative strategies; and (5) the robust preference for adjuvant targeted therapy for patients with rNSCLC and sensitizing EGFR and ALK tumor alterations. Our primary goals were to provide practical recommendations sensitive to the global differences in biology and resources for patients with rNSCLC and to provide expert consensus guidance tailored to the individualized patient needs, goals, and preferences in their cancer care journey as these are areas where physicians must make daily clinical decisions in the absence of definitive data. These recommendations will continue to evolve as the treatment landscape for rNSCLC expands and more knowledge is acquired on the best therapeutic approach in specific patient and disease subgroups.

UBXN11 Predicts as a Poor Index for Colorectal Cancer and Contributes to the Tumorigenesis by Activating NF-κB Signaling

BACKGROUND

The complex mechanisms of colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis and progression remain poorly understood. This study endeavors to unravel the role of UBXN11within the context of CRC.

METHODS

UBXN11 expression level in CRC, stomach adenocarcinoma and esophageal carcinoma, and the overall survival in corresponding cancers were analyzed using UALCAN database. Human CRC cell lines and xenograft mouse model with UBXN11 overexpression were established to investigate the pathological role of UBXN11 in CRC progression. Luciferase assay, qPCR, and Western blot were performed to dissect the interaction between UBXN11 and NF-κB signaling.

RESULTS

Heightened UBXN11 expression was observed in various digestive tract tumors, which was positively correlated with the reduced overall survival rates in CRC patients. Overexpression of UBXN11 significantly enhanced CRC cell proliferation in vitro and promoted tumor growth in vivo. Mechanistically, UBXN11 promoted CRC tumorigenesis through increasing the activation of NF-κB signaling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the pivotal role of UBXN11 in CRC progression and paves the way for novel therapeutic strategies for CRC treatment.

Genetic mutation profiling reveals biomarkers for targeted therapy efficacy and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

The genetic heterogeneity of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations may affect clinical responses and outcomes to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). This study aims to investigate the genomic factors that influence the efficacy and clinical outcomes of first-line, second-line and third-line treatments in NSCLC and explore the heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms.

Materials and methods

This real-world study comprised 65 patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC. Molecular alterations were detected using a customized DNA panel before and after administering targeted therapy. The efficacy and prognosis of each treatment line were evaluated.

Results

In first-generation EGFR-TKIs treatment, gefitinib showed favorable efficacy compared to icotinib and erlotinib, particularly in patients with EGFR L858R mutations. The resistance mechanisms to first-generation EGFR-TKIs varied among different EGFR mutation cohorts and different first-generation EGFR-TKIs. In second-line EGFR-TKIs treatment, EPH receptor A3 (EPHA3), IKAROS family zinc finger 1 (IKZF1), p21 (RAC1) activated kinase 5 (PAK5), DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit (POLE), RAD21 cohesin complex component (RAD21) and RNA binding motif protein 10 (RBM10) mutations were markedly associated with poorer progression-free survival (PFS). Notably, EPHA3, IKZF1 and RBM10 were identified as independent predictors of PFS. The mechanisms of osimertinib resistance exhibited heterogeneity, with a higher proportion of non-EGFR-dependent resistant mutations. In third-line treatments, the combination of osimertinib and anlotinib demonstrated superior efficacy compared to other regimens. Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2A (GRIN2A) mutation was an independent risk indicator of shorter OS following third-line treatments.

Conclusions

Comprehending the tumor evolution in NSCLC is advantageous for assessing the efficacy and prognosis at each stage of treatment, providing valuable insights to guide personalized treatment decisions for patients.

Novel small molecule inhibitors targeting renal cell carcinoma: Status, challenges, future directions

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal malignancy with a rapidly increasing morbidity and mortality rate gradually. RCC has a high mortality rate and an extremely poor prognosis. Despite numerous treatment strategies, RCC is resistant to conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In addition, the limited clinical efficacy and inevitable resistance of multiple agents suggest an unmet clinical need. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel anti-RCC candidates. Nowadays many promising results have been achieved with the development of novel small molecule inhibitors against RCC. This paper reviews the recent research progress of novel small molecule inhibitors targeting RCC. It is focusing on the structural optimization process and conformational relationships of small molecule inhibitors, as well as the potential mechanisms and anticancer activities for the treatment of RCC. To provide a theoretical basis for promoting the clinical translation of novel small molecule inhibitors, we discussed their application prospects and future development directions. It could be capable of improving the clinical efficacy of RCC and improving the therapy resistance for RCC.

Perioperative Treatment Strategies in EGFR-Mutant Early-Stage NSCLC: Current Evidence and Future Challenges

Treatment with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib is considered a new standard in patients with completely resected stage I to IIIA NSCLC harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation. This therapeutic approach significantly prolonged the disease-free survival and the overall survival versus placebo and revealed a significant role in preventing the occurrence of brain metastases. However, many unanswered questions remain, including the optimal duration of this therapy, whether all patients benefit from adjuvant osimertinib, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this population. Indeed, there is a renewed interest in neoadjuvant strategies with targeted therapies in resectable NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers. In light of these considerations, we discuss the past and current treatment options, and the clinical challenges that should be addressed to optimize the treatment outcomes in this patient population.

Understanding health-related quality of life measures used in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer clinical trials: A review

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important consideration in cancer clinical research, which can be substantially influenced by cancer treatment procedures and medications. The treatment landscape for early-stage (stage I-III) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. In this light, it is important to evaluate the most suitable instruments for HRQoL assessment and timing. Given there is often a requirement for patients with early-stage disease to receive long-term treatment to reduce the risk of disease recurrence after surgery, maintenance or improvement in HRQoL is an important goal of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments. Key challenges with assessing HRQoL relate to the suitability of existing instruments to measure relevant treatment-related adverse effects, consistency in HRQoL assessment approach between similar studies, gaps in data collection and reporting, and interpretation of longitudinal data. Frequent assessments during and after treatment are warranted to capture the true impact of treatment and disease progression on HRQoL, and changes in the relative importance of these factors over time. There is scope for improving existing HRQoL approaches, including ease of use and integration of digital tools to facilitate analysis and interpretation, to enhance the experience of both patients and healthcare professionals. In this narrative review, we discuss key considerations for HRQoL assessment and evaluate the tools currently available to measure HRQoL in NSCLC, many of which were designed with advanced disease in mind. We focus on the key challenges of measuring HRQoL for the specific needs of patients with early-stage disease, and consider future perspectives, to determine the most appropriate HRQoL instruments and analysis methods to use in early-stage NSCLC clinical trials.1.

Management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: State of the art and future directions

Lung cancer is the second most common and the deadliest type of cancer worldwide. Clinically, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common pathological type of lung cancer; approximately one-third of affected patients have locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC, stage III NSCLC) at diagnosis. Because of its heterogeneity, LA-NSCLC often requires multidisciplinary assessment. Moreover, the prognosis of affected patients is much below satisfaction, and the efficacy of traditional therapeutic strategies has reached a plateau. With the emergence of targeted therapies and immunotherapies, as well as the continuous development of novel radiotherapies, we have entered an era of novel treatment paradigm for LA-NSCLC. Here, we reviewed the landscape of relevant therapeutic modalities, including adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative targeted and immune strategies in patients with resectable LA-NSCLC with/without oncogenic alterations; as well as novel combinations of chemoradiation and immunotherapy/targeted therapy in unresectable LA-NSCLC. We addressed the unresolved challenges that remain in the field, and examined future directions to optimize clinical management and increase the cure rate of LA-NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy in Resectable NSCLC: Current and Future Perspectives

The standard of care (SoC) for medically operable patients with early-stage (stages I-IIIB) NSCLC is surgery combined with (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with stages II to IIIB disease and some stage IB or, rarely, chemoradiation (stage III disease with mediastinal lymph node metastases). Despite these treatments, metastatic recurrence is common and associated with poor survival, highlighting the need for systemic therapies that are more effective than the current SoC. After the success of targeted therapy (TT) in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers, these agents are being investigated for the perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) treatment of patients with early-stage NSCLC. Adjuvant osimertinib is the only TT approved for use in the early-stage setting, and there are no approved neoadjuvant TTs. We discuss the importance of comprehensive biomarker testing at diagnosis to identify individuals who may benefit from neoadjuvant targeted treatments and review emerging data from neoadjuvant TT trials. We also address the potential challenges for establishing neoadjuvant TTs as SoC in the early-stage setting, including the identification and validation of early response markers to guide care and accelerate drug development, and discuss safety considerations in the perioperative setting. Initial data indicate that neoadjuvant TTs are effective and well tolerated in patients with EGFR- or ALK-positive early-stage NSCLC. Data from ongoing trials will determine whether neoadjuvant targeted agents will become a new SoC for individuals with oncogene-addicted resectable NSCLC.

Association between number of dissected lymph nodes and survival in patients undergoing resection for clinical stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Lymph node dissection is essential for staging of pure solid lung adenocarcinoma and selection of treatment after surgical resection, particularly for stage I disease since the rate of lymph node metastasis can vary from 0 to 23.7%.

METHODS

We retrospectively screened all adult patients (18 years of age or older) who underwent lobectomy for pure solid cT1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma between January 2015 and December 2017 at our center. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the association between the number of dissected lymph nodes and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and to determine the optimal number of dissected lymph nodes.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 458 patients (age: 60.26 ± 8.07 years; 241 women). RFS increased linearly with an increasing number of dissected lymph nodes at a range between 0 and 9. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly longer RFS in patients with ≥ 9 vs. <9 dissected lymph nodes. In subgroup analysis, ≥ 9 dissected lymph nodes was not only associated with longer RFS in patients without lymph node metastasis (n = 332) but also in patients with metastasis (n = 126). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, ≥ 9 dissected lymph nodes was independently associated with longer RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.73; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

≥9 Dissected lymph nodes was associated with longer RFS; accordingly, we recommend dissecting 9 lymph nodes in patients undergoing lobectomy for stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma.

Almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study

Objective

This study mainly observes the efficacy and safety of almonertinib plus chemotherapy compared with almonertinib alone in the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

Methods

In this study, clinical data of 68 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated in Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital and Nanjing Chest Hospital between April 2020 and December 2022 were collected. Among them, the study group (n=30) received second-line almonertinib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, while the control group (n=38) received almonertinib alone. The near-term and long-term effects and adverse events of the two groups were compared respectively.

Results

The median follow-up time until 31 December 2022 was 16.3 months (95% CI: 11.32-21.34). Results of chi-square analysis showed no statistically significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) between the study group and the control group (56.73% vs. 55.3%, P>0.05; 100% vs. 86.8%, P>0.05). Log-rank test comparing the two groups revealed that the median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the study group was significantly longer than that of the control group by 3.1 months (12.7 vs. 9.6 months, P=0.01). Multivariate COX proportional risk model showed a statistically significant effect of treatment method and PS score on PFS (HR=0.43, P=0.023; HR=3.82, P=0.001). In terms of safety, most of the adverse events (AEs) were mild, with no grade 4-5 in the two groups, and the overall tolerance of patients was good.

Conclusion

For advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, second-line treatment with almonertinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS compared with almonertinib alone without a significant increase in adverse events, providing efficacy and safety.

A real-world study comparing perioperative chemotherapy and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for treatment of resected stage III EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The patient population with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is heterogeneous, with varying staging characteristics and diverse treatment options. Despite the potential practice-changing implications of randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of perioperative epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), concerns have been raised due to conflicting overall survival (OS) results. Few real-world studies have examined the survival outcomes of patients with resected EGFR-mutant stage III adenocarcinoma receiving perioperative chemotherapy and EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we enrolled patients with resected stage III adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations between January 2011 and December 2021. Patients were classified into two groups: perioperative chemotherapy and perioperative EGFR-TKIs. Outcomes and prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the analysis. Perioperative EGFR-TKIs led to longer progression-free survival (PFS) than chemotherapy (38.6 versus 14.2 months; p = 0.019). However, only pathological risk factors predicted poor PFS in multivariate analysis. Patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy had longer OS than those receiving EGFR-TKIs (111.3 versus 50.2 months; p = 0.052). Multivariate analysis identified perioperative treatment with EGFR-TKIs as an independent predictor of poor OS (HR: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.22-11.54).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that chemotherapy should be considered in the perioperative setting for high-risk patients, when taking pathological risk factors into consideration, and that optimized sequencing of EGFR-TKIs might be the most critical determinant of OS.

Rational application of EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To determine the role and rational application of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHOD

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the survival outcomes between adjuvant EGFR-TKIs and adjuvant chemotherapy or a placebo, or between different EGFR-TKI treatment durations for resected NSCLC, were eligible for inclusion. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as effective measures using random-effect or fixed-effect models. Subgroup analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs involving 2102 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with or without EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy were included. For all stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients, EGFR-TKIs adjuvant therapy could not only significantly improve DFS (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.63, P < 0.001) and 2- and 3-year DFS rates, but also improve OS (HR 0.72, 95% CI, 0.54-0.96, P = 0.024), compared with chemotherapy or the placebo. Further subgroup analyses indicated prolonged OS from first-generation EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy in stage III patients, compared with chemotherapy or the placebo (HR for OS, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.63; P = 0.001). Of note, osimertinib adjuvant therapy led to the OS benefit expanding from stage III to stage II-III patients, with significantly improved DFS and a lower risk of brain recurrence, compared with the placebo. A 2-year treatment duration with EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy showed a significantly lower recurrence risk than a ≤ 1-year duration.

CONCLUSION

The DFS advantage from first-generation EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy can translate into an OS benefit in stage III NSCLC patients. Osimertinib might be more suitable for adjuvant therapy than first-generation EGFR-TKIs, because of the lower recurrence rate and the potential OS benefit even in early-stage patients. The optimal treatment duration for EGFR-TKIs at different stages of disease needs to be validated.

Hypoxia-mediated promotion of glucose metabolism in non-small cell lung cancer correlates with activation of the EZH2/FBXL7/PFKFB4 axis

F-box/LRR-repeat protein 7 (FBXL7) was predicted as a differentially expressed E3 ubiquitin ligase in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which has been suggested to influence cancer growth and metastasis. In this study, we aimed to decipher the function of FBXL7 in NSCLC and delineate the upstream and downstream mechanisms. FBXL7 expression was verified in NSCLC cell lines and GEPIA-based tissue samples, after which the upstream transcription factor of FBXL7 was bioinformatically identified. The substrate PFKFB4 of the FBXL7 was screened out by tandem affinity purification coupled with mass-spectrometry (TAP/MS). FBXL7 was downregulated in NSCLC cell lines and tissue samples. FBXL7 ubiquitinated and degraded PFKFB4, thus suppressing glucose metabolism and malignant phenotypes of NSCLC cells. Hypoxia-induced HIF-1α upregulation elevated EZH2 and inhibited FBXL7 transcription and reduced its expression, thus promoting PFKFB4 protein stability. By this mechanism, glucose metabolism and the malignant phenotype were enhanced. In addition, knockdown of EZH2 impeded tumor growth through the FBXL7/PFKFB4 axis. In conclusion, our work reveals that the EZH2/FBXL7/PFKFB4 axis plays a regulatory role in glucose metabolism and tumor growth of NSCLC, which is expected to be potential biomarkers for NSCLC.

Gene signature developed for predicting early relapse and survival in early-stage pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to construct a predictive signature integrating tumour-mutation- and copy-number-variation-associated features using machine learning to precisely predict early relapse and survival in patients with resected stage I-II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with microscopically confirmed stage I-II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing R0 resection at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between March 2015 and December 2016 were enrolled. Whole exosome sequencing was performed, and genes with different mutation or copy number variation statuses between patients with and without relapse within 1 year were identified using bioinformatics analysis. A support vector machine was used to evaluate the importance of the differential gene features and to develop a signature. Signature validation was performed in an independent cohort. The associations of the support vector machine signature and single gene features with disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed. Biological functions of integrated genes were further analysed.

RESULTS

Overall, 30 and 40 patients were included in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Some 11 genes with differential patterns were first identified; using a support vector machine, four features (mutations of DNAH9, TP53, and TUBGCP6, and copy number variation of TMEM132E) were further selected and integrated to construct a predictive signature (the support vector machine classifier). In the training cohort, the 1-year disease-free survival rates were 88 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 73 to 100) and 7 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 1 to 47) in the low-support vector machine subgroup and the high-support vector machine subgroup respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses showed that high support vector machine was significantly and independently associated with both worse overall survival (HR 29.20 (95 per cent c.i. 4.48 to 190.21); P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR 72.04 (95 per cent c.i. 6.74 to 769.96); P < 0.001). The area under the curve of the support vector machine signature for 1-year disease-free survival (0.900) was significantly larger than the area under the curve values of the mutations of DNAH9 (0.733; P = 0.039), TP53 (0.767; P = 0.024), and TUBGCP6 (0.733; P = 0.023), the copy number variation of TMEM132E (0.700; P = 0.014), TNM stage (0.567; P = 0.002), and differentiation grade (0.633; P = 0.005), suggesting higher predictive accuracy for prognosis. The value of the signature was further validated in the validation cohort. The four genes included in the support vector machine signature (DNAH9, TUBGCP6, and TMEM132E were novel in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma) were significantly associated with the tumour immune microenvironment, G protein-coupled receptor binding and signalling, cell-cell adhesion, etc.

CONCLUSION

The newly constructed support vector machine signature precisely and powerfully predicted relapse and survival in patients with stage I-II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after R0 resection.

Adjuvant icotinib versus observation in patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated stage IB NSCLC (GASTO1003, CORIN): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

This phase 2 trial aimed to compare adjuvant icotinib with observation in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive resected stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We performed a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial from May 1, 2015 to December 29, 2020 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in China. Patients with completely resected, EGFR-mutant, stage IB (the 7th edition of TNM staging) NSCLC without adjuvant chemotherapy were randomised (1:1) to receive adjuvant therapy with icotinib (125 mg, three times daily) for 12 months or to undergo observation until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). CORIN (GASTO1003) was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, with the number NCT02264210.

FINDINGS

A total of 128 patients were randomised, with 63 patients in the icotinib group and 65 patients in the observation group. The median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months. The three-year DFS was significantly higher in the icotinib group (96.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3-99.9) than in the observation group (84.0%, 95% CI, 75.1-92.9; P = 0.041). The DFS was significantly longer in the icotinib group than in the observation group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.81; P = 0.013). The OS data were immature, with three deaths in the observation arm. In the icotinib group, adverse events (AEs) of any grade were reported in 49 patients (77.8%), and grade 3 or greater AEs occurred in four patients (6.3%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggested that adjuvant icotinib improved the 3-year DFS in patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated stage IB NSCLC with a manageable safety profile.

FUNDING

This study was sponsored by Betta Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Landscape of Genomic Alterations and PD-L1 Expression in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)-A Single Center, Retrospective Observational Study

Precision oncology and immunotherapy have revolutionized the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Emerging studies show that targeted therapies are also beneficial for patients with driver alterations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in early-stage NSCLC (stages I-IIIA). Furthermore, patients with elevated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression appear to respond favorably to adjuvant immunotherapy. To determine the frequency of genomic alterations and PD-L1 status in early-stage NSCLC, we retrospectively analyzed data from 2066 unselected, single-center patients with NSCLC diagnosed using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Nine-hundred and sixty-two patients (46.9%) presented with early-stage NSCLC. Of these, 37.0% had genomic alterations for which targeted therapies have already been approved for advanced NSCLC. The frequencies of driver mutations in the early stages were equivalent to those in advanced stages, i.e., the rates of EGFR mutations in adenocarcinomas were 12.7% (72/567) and 12.0% (78/650) in early and advanced NSCLC, respectively (p = 0778). In addition, 46.3% of early-stage NSCLC cases were PD-L1-positive, with a tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1%. With comparable frequencies of driver mutations in early and advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 overexpression in nearly half of patients with early-stage NSCLC, a broad spectrum of biomarkers for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies is available, and several are currently being investigated in clinical trials.