Cost of Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States: Results of the 2021 Report by Deloitte Access Economics, Commissioned by Teen Cancer America

Asking the "Right" Questions about Financial Hardship: Using Cognitive Interviews with Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Caregivers to Inform Measure Development

Purpose: Financial hardship as a result of cancer treatment can have a significant and lasting negative impact on adolescents and young adults (AYAs) and their families. To address a lack of developmentally informed and psychometrically sound measures of financial hardship for AYAs and their caregivers, we used rigorous measurement development methods recommended by the National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) to determine comprehensibility and relevance of measure content. Methods: Our multi-step approach involved item identification, refinement, and generation; translatability and reading level review; and cognitive interviews. A purposive sample of 25 AYAs and 10 caregivers participated, ensuring representation across age, education, gender, race/ethnicity, and cancer type. Results: Fifty patient-reported and caregiver-reported items were developed across material, psychosocial, and behavioral subdomains of financial hardship. Translatability and reading level reviews resulted in 22 patient-reported and 25 caregiver-reported items being rewritten. Eighty-eight percent of patients and all caregivers described the items as easy to answer. Younger AYAs (15 to 25 years of age) were more likely to say the items were less relevant for them. Forty-six patient-reported and 48 caregiver-reported items were recommended for further testing. Conclusion: This study is the first to use in-depth qualitative methods to center AYA patient and caregiver experiences in the creation of new measures of financial hardship. Data support the comprehensibility and content validity of these preliminary item banks. Future large-scale, quantitative testing will lead to additional refinements and support the use of short forms and computer-adaptive testing for a diverse sample of AYAs and their caregivers.

Toward identification and intervention to address financial toxicity and unmet health-related social needs among adolescents and emerging adults with cancer and their caregivers: A cross-cultural perspective

PURPOSE

We qualitatively explored the unique needs and preferences for financial toxicity screening and interventions to address financial toxicity among adolescents and emerging adults (younger AYAs: 15-25 years) with cancer and their caregivers.

METHODS

We recruited English- or Spanish-speaking younger AYAs who were treated for cancer within the past 2 years and their caregivers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore preferences for screening and interventional study development to address financial toxicity. The data were coded using conventional content analysis. Codes were reviewed with the study team, and interviews continued until saturation was reached; codes were consolidated into categories and themes during consensus discussions.

RESULTS

We interviewed 17 participants; nine were younger AYAs. Seven of the 17 preferred to speak Spanish. We identified three cross-cutting themes: burden, support, and routine, consistent, and clear. The burden came in the form of unexpected costs such as transportation to appointments, as well as emotional burdens such as AYAs worrying about how much their family sacrificed for their care or caregivers worrying about the AYA's physical and financial future. Support, in the form of familial, community, healthcare institution, and insurance, was critical to mitigating the effects of financial toxicity in this population. Participants emphasized the importance of meeting individual financial needs by routinely and consistently asking about financial factors and providing clear guidance to navigate these needs.

CONCLUSION

Younger AYAs and their caregivers experience significant financial challenges and unmet health-related social needs during cancer treatment and often rely on key supports to alleviate these unmet needs. When developing interventions to mitigate financial toxicity, clinicians and health systems should prioritize clear, consistent, and tailorable approaches to support younger AYA cancer survivors and their families.

Burden of Morbidity and Mortality in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

There are an estimated 650,00 survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers in the United States, a number that is expected to markedly increase in the coming decades. The recognition of the potential for some cancer treatments to affect the health of patients for many years after the initial diagnosis has prompted investigators to examine the evolving burden of late morbidity and mortality in AYAs with cancer after treatment completion. Studies in large international cohorts of AYA cancer survivors have now shown that the burden of late effects in survivors treated during the past four decades is substantial, affecting the health and well-being of the survivor, health systems' preparedness to meet their health care needs in the future, and societal economic costs that are largely affected by loss of productivity. We highlight the unique considerations for AYA cancer survivors, identify gaps in knowledge for future research, and provide an overview of emerging efforts to mitigate late effects in these survivors. Ongoing multidisciplinary bench-to-bedside collaborations are critical to understanding the biology of late effects in AYA cancer survivors and to developing personalized interventions to mitigate them. The growing population of AYA cancer survivors makes it imperative that these efforts extend across the cancer care continuum, which will allow survivors to ultimately live to their fullest potential.

Health Care Transitions Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

Survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers, defined as individuals diagnosed with a primary malignancy between age 15 and 39 years, are a growing population with unique developmental, psychosocial, and health-related needs. These individuals are at excess risk of developing a wide range of chronic comorbidities compared with the general population and, therefore, require lifelong, risk-based, survivorship care to optimize long-term health outcomes. The health care needs of survivors of AYA cancers are particularly complicated given the often heterogeneous and sometimes fragmented care they receive throughout the cancer care continuum. For example, AYA survivors are often treated in disparate settings (pediatric v adult) on dissimilar protocols that include different recommendations for longitudinal follow-up. Specialized tools and techniques are needed to ensure that AYA survivors move seamlessly from acute cancer care to survivorship care and, in many cases, from pediatric to adult clinics while still remaining engaged in long-term follow-up. Systematic, age-appropriate transitional practices involving well-established clinical models of care, survivorship care plans, and survivorship guidelines are needed to facilitate effective transitions between providers. Future studies are necessary to enhance and optimize the clinical effectiveness of transition processes in AYA cancer survivors.

Survival Trends Among Adolescents and Young Adults Diagnosed With Cancer in the United States: Comparisons With Children and Older Adults

PURPOSE

Although data from 1975 to 1997 revealed a gap in cancer survival improvement in adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15-39 years) compared with children and older adults, more recent studies have reported improvements in AYA cancer survival overall. The current analysis provides an update of 5-year relative survival and cancer survival trends among AYAs compared with children and older adults.

METHODS

We obtained data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for 17 regions to obtain recent (2010-2018) 5-year relative survival estimates by cancer type, stage, sex, and race/ethnicity by age group. In addition, we calculated 5-year relative survival trends during 2000-2014.

RESULTS

Across 33 common AYA cancers, AYAs and children had high 5-year relative survival (86%) and experienced similar survival improvements over time (average absolute change: AYAs, 0.33%; children 0.36%). Among AYAs, 73% of cancers had improvement in 5-year relative survival since 2000. Despite this overall progress, we identified cancers where survival was worse in AYAs than younger or older patients and cancers that have had either a lack of improvement (osteosarcoma and male breast) or decreases in survival (cervical and female bladder) over time. Furthermore, males had inferior survival to females for all cancers, except Kaposi sarcoma and bladder cancer, and non-Hispanic Black/African American AYAs experienced worse survival than other racial/ethnic groups for many cancers considered in this study.

CONCLUSION

Future studies should focus on identifying factors affecting survival disparities by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Differences in biology, clinical trial enrollment, delivery of treatment according to clinical guidelines, and supportive and long-term survivorship care may account for the survival disparities we observed and warrant further investigation.

Leveraging health care technology to improve health outcomes and reduce outcome disparities in AYA leukemia

Significant improvements have occurred for adolescent and young adult (AYA) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients following the widespread adoption of "pediatric-inspired" treatment regimens for AYA patients cared for in adult oncology settings. However, for AYA patients, aged 15 to 39, an outcomes gap remains in B-ALL, necessitating the incorporation of novel therapies into up-front treatment regimens. As a result, clinical trial enrollment remains the current standard of care for AYA B-ALL across disease subtypes when available and accessible. Currently, several up-front trials are looking to incorporate the use of inotuzumab, blinatumomab, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy into existing chemotherapy backbones for AYA patients, as well as tyrosine kinase inhibitors for both Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) and Ph-like B-ALL. In addition to ongoing attempts to improve up-front treatments by incorporating immunotherapy and targeted approaches, the increased use of next generation sequencing for measurable residual disease evaluation has led to superior risk-stratification and a decreased need to pursue consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation during the first complete remission for many patients.