Surgery for CNS Tumors in the Brazilian National Health Care System

Validated quantitative needs assessment differences in the management of children with central nervous system cancer between Brazil, an upper middle-income country, and the United States of America, a high income country

BACKGROUND

Pediatric cancer cure rates differ among high-income countries (HIC) and upper middle-income countries (UMIC). We have compared individual capacities of two major referral pediatric centers from a HIC and an UMIC caring for children with central nervous system (CNS) cancer.

METHODS

A quantitative needs assessment questionnaire and key informant interviews, distributed in March of 2017, were used to evaluate the treatment of children with CNS cancer at Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC) children's cancer center in São Paulo, Brazil and Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH) in Columbus, Ohio, United States of America (USA).

RESULTS

Both hospitals had 24-hour pediatric oncology, nursing and intensivist coverage. Supportive care available at both institutions included social workers, psychologists, child life specialists, and physical/occupational/speech therapists. Differences included two part-time neuroradiologists and one pathologist specializing in neuropathology at IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP, whereas eight full-time neuroradiologists and two neuropathologists at NCH/OSU. There were four pediatric neurosurgeons on staff at each hospital; however, there were only 2 operative days per week at IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP, compared with 7 days at NCH/OSU. Additionally, time to initiation of radiation therapy at IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP extended 2-4 weeks compared with less than 1 week at NCH/OSU.

CONCLUSIONS

Center-specific differences in resources exist in highly specialized hospitals caring for children with CNS cancer in HIC and UMIC. This quantitative needs assessment may facilitate the development of targeted strategies for effective interventions to improve on the management of children with CNS cancers.

Effects of time to chemoradiation on high-grade gliomas from the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area

High-Grade Gliomas (HGG) are the most frequent brain tumor in adults. The gold standard of clinical care recommends beginning chemoradiation within 6 weeks of surgery. Disparities in access to healthcare in Argentina are notorious, often leading to treatment delays. We conducted this retrospective study to evaluate if time to chemoradiation after surgery is correlated with progression-free survival (PFS). Our study included clinical cases with a histological diagnosis of Glioblastoma (GBM), Anaplastic Astrocytoma (AA) or High-Grade Glioma (HGG) in patients over 18 years of age from 2014 to 2020. We collected data on clinical presentation, type of resection, time to surgery, time to chemoradiation, location within the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area (BAMA) and type of health insurance. We found 63 patients that fit our inclusion criteria, including 26 (41.3%) females and 37 (58.7%) males. Their median age was 54 years old (19-86). Maximal safe resection was achieved in 49.2% (n = 31) of the patients, incomplete resection in 34.9% (n = 22) and the other 15.9% (n = 10) received a biopsy, but no resection. The type of health care insurance was almost evenly divided, with 55.6% (n = 35) of the patients having public vs. 44.4% (n = 28) having private health insurance. Median time to chemoradiation after surgery was 8 (CI 6.68-9.9) weeks for the global population. When we ordered the patients PFS by time to chemoradiation we found that there was a statistically significant effect of time to chemoradiation on patient PFS. Patients had a PFS of 10 months (p = 0.014) (CI 6.89-13.10) when they received chemoradiation <5 weeks vs a PFS of 7 months (CI 4.93-9.06) when they received chemoradiation between 5 to 8 weeks and a PFS of 4 months (CI 3.76-4.26 HR 2.18 p = 0.006) when they received chemoradiation >8 weeks after surgery. Also, our univariate and multivariate analysis found that temporal lobe location (p = 0.03), GMB histology (p = 0.02) and biopsy as surgical intervention (p = 0.02) all had a statistically significant effect on patient PFS. Thus, time to chemoradiation is an important factor in patient PFS. Our data show that although an increase in HGG severity contributes to a decrease in patient PFS, there is also a large effect of time to chemoradiation. Our results suggest that we can improve patient PFS by making access to healthcare in Buenos Aires more equitable by reducing the average time to chemoradiation following tumor resection.