Prevention Is Key: Importance of Early Recognition and Referral in Combating Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Ancillary Treatment Referrals and Visits After Breast Cancer Surgery in a Sociodemographically Diverse Population

BACKGROUND

Ancillary therapies with rehabilitative, palliative, and survivorship specialists mitigate adverse effects of breast cancer surgery. Existing data suggest that patients from disadvantaged backgrounds may be less likely to receive these services. This study aimed to assess variations in ancillary provider referrals and patient visits at a high-volume urban cancer center.

METHODS

Electronic health records of breast cancer surgical patients at the Yale-New Haven Health System between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. The primary end points were postoperative referral to ancillary service providers and patient use of ancillary services (defined as attending ≥ 1 consultation). Associations between end points and demographic/disease variables were identified in uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The study identified 5496 patients: 2288 patients (41.6%) referred to ancillary services and 1572 patients (28.6%) who attended one or more consultations. Referrals were highest among the patients with Hispanic (57.5%) or black (54.9%) ancestry, no health insurance (57.6%), lowest percentage of high school degrees for the zip code area (50.5%), and poorest median income bracket (50.7%). Associations remained significant in the multivariable analysis (p < 0.05). Minority race remained associated with referrals in analyses of each ancillary service individually. Visits to ancillary specialists were greatest among the patients with private insurance (70.7%), highest percentage of high school degrees (72.8%), highest median household income (72.2%), and Hispanic ethnicity (73.5%). Highest median household income (odds ratio [OR] 1.45; p = 0.02) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.50; p = 0.05) remained associated in the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In a well-resourced health system serving a demographically diverse population, traditional markers of poor health care access were associated with referral for ancillary treatment after breast cancer surgery but not with utilization of ancillary treatment. Health care access remains a critical barrier to adjunctive therapies that target postoperative morbidity and elevate quality of life.

Effect of exercise on rehabilitation of breast cancer surgery patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

To determine the effective exercise methods for different complications of breast cancer patients after surgery.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic search was carried out with no time limit until May 2020. Studies must have been randomized controlled trials of patients after breast cancer surgery, without limit to the way of exercise. Literature quality was evaluated by the modified Jadad scale. The meta-analysis was conducted with CMA2.0 software.

RESULTS

Aerobic exercise reduced the intensity of the pain (MD = -1.043), improved shoulder flexion (MD = 3.398) and internal rotation range (MD = 3.868), lessened upper limb dysfunction (MD = -5.231) and improved muscle strength during flexion (MD = 1.076) and abduction (MD = 0.991). Shoulder elbow movement improved the range of shoulder external rotation (MD = 2.691) and reduced the incidence of arm lymphedema (RR = 0.343). Anti-resistance exercise also lessened upper limb dysfunction (MD = - 4.094).

The Predictive Role of Illness Perception on Lymphedema Risk-Management Behaviors in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND

Illness perception affects lymphedema risk-management behaviors. However, little is known about these behavioral changes within 6 months after surgery and how illness perception predicts behavioral trajectories.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the trajectories of lymphedema risk-management behaviors in breast cancer survivors within 6 months after surgery and the predictive role of illness perception.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from a cancer hospital in China and completed a baseline survey (Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire) and follow-up assessments (Lymphedema Risk-Management Behavior Questionnaire and the physical exercise compliance dimension of the Functional Exercise Adherence Scale) at the first, third, and sixth months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 251 women were analyzed. Regarding the Lymphedema Risk-Management Behavior Questionnaire, the total scores were stable. The scores of the "lifestyle" and "skin care" dimensions showed upward trends; the scores of the "avoiding compression and injury" and "other matters needing attention" dimensions showed downward trends. For "physical exercise compliance," scores remained stable. Furthermore, key illness perceptions (especially "personal control" and "causes") at baseline could predict the starting levels of and changes in behavioral trajectories.

CONCLUSION

Different lymphedema risk-management behaviors exhibited different trajectories and could be predicted by illness perception.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Oncology nurses should focus on the early development of behaviors related to "lifestyle" and "skin care" and the later maintenance of "avoiding compression and injury" and "other matters needing attention" during follow-up, as well as help women strengthen their personal control beliefs and correctly understand the causes of lymphedema during hospitalization.

Early Referral for Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Do We Follow the Evidence? A Two-Year Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

The early detection of breast-cancer-related lymphedema and referral for therapy has the potential to reduce lymphedema-related morbidity. Although research shows the benefits, a gap is observed between evidence and daily practice. We aimed to determine whether the early detection of lymphedema and referral for treatment is adequate following the current guidelines. Women with primary breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy or ablative treatment were included. Demographic-, general health-, tumor-, and treatment-related data were recorded. Bilateral arm volume measurements were performed preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. A 5% or greater Relative Volume Change was considered the cutoff point for lymphedema and as an indication for therapy referral. After 24 months post-surgery, the main outcomes show that among the patients with early signs of lymphedema, based on a Relative Volume Change ≥5%, a nonreferral for therapy was noted in 83%. Additionally, we observed a significant improvement of the mean Relative Volume Change at 24 months within this group, which might implicate that nonreferral was an adequate choice and that watchful waiting is appropriate when lymphedema is detected within the first year post-surgery.

Prevelance of upper extremity lymphedema and risk factors in patients with mastectomy: Single-center, observational, cross-sectional study

Objective:

Upper extremity complaints are frequently encountered in breast cancer. It was aimed to investigate the pain, extremity pain, and limitation of motion, lymphedema prevalence, severity, risk factors and quality of life in patients with breast cancer followed by mastectomy in our center.

Materials and Methods:

The study included 67 patients with mastectomy. The presence of lymphedema, lymphedema duration, and grade of lymphedema were recorded. Grip strength was measured on both hands using a dynamometer; arm, shoulder and hand problems were evaluated using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand. Quality of life was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life scale-short form.

Results:

The presence of lymphedema was 23.9%; the most common was international society of lymphology grade 1 (76.1%); the median lymphedema duration was 12 (range, 3-72) months. Radical/modified radical mastectomy (58.2%) was the most common type of surgery. Median pain score in the affected extremity according to the visual analogue scale was 2 (minimum: 0/maximum: 7); the presence of shoulder pain was 40.3%; shoulder movement limitation was 7.5%.

Conclusion:

It was found that lymphedema had a negative effect on quality of life by affecting shoulder, arm, and hand functions even in the early stages. The recognition of risk factors and signs of upper extremity complications in breast cancer survivors will contribute to rehabilitation success.

Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema in Hispanic Women: A Phenomenological Study

Introduction: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), a long-term side effect of treatment, can occur at any point in time. With the extensive physical and psychological effects of BCRL, few studies have focused on the lived experience. The purpose of this study was to examine the lived experience of Hispanic women dealing with BCRL, particularly women of Mexican descent or origin. Method: Using interpretive phenomenology, 13 Hispanic women with BCRL, 42 to 80 years, were individually interviewed. Data analysis was conducted using interpretive reading of field notes, journal entries, and transcribed interviews. Results: Three central themes emerged from the findings, "sense of loss," "resignation to the new self," and "not knowing." Further subthemes highlight the physical, psychological, and spiritual aspects of living with BCRL. Discussion: Cultural awareness of the impact BCRL has on activities of daily living of Hispanic women should be part of a holistic plan of nursing care when caring for this population.