1
|
Iachecen F, Dallagassa MR, Portela Santos EA, Carvalho DR, Ioshii SO. Is it possible to automate the discovery of process maps for the time-driven activity-based costing method? A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1408. [PMID: 38093275 PMCID: PMC10720189 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10411-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this manuscript was to identify the methods used to create process maps for care pathways that utilized the time-driven activity-based costing method. METHODS This is a systematic mapping review. Searches were performed in the Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic literature databases from 2004 to September 25, 2022. The included studies reported practical cases from healthcare institutions in all medical fields as long as the time-driven activity-based costing method was employed. We used the time-driven activity-based costing method and analyzed the created process maps and a qualitative approach to identify the main fields. RESULTS A total of 412 studies were retrieved, and 70 articles were included. Most of the articles are related to the fields of orthopedics and childbirth-related to hospital surgical procedures. We also identified various studies in the field of oncology and telemedicine services. The main methods for creating the process maps were direct observational practices, complemented by the involvement of multidisciplinary teams through surveys and interviews. Only 33% of the studies used hospital documents or healthcare data records to integrate with the process maps, and in 67% of the studies, the created maps were not validated by specialists. CONCLUSIONS The application of process mining techniques effectively automates models generated through clinical pathways. They are applied to the time-driven activity-based costing method, making the process more agile and contributing to the visualization of high degrees of variations encountered in processes, thereby making it possible to enhance and achieve continual improvements in processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franciele Iachecen
- Graduate Program in Health Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná., 1155, Imaculada Conceição st., Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-90, Brazil.
| | - Marcelo Rosano Dallagassa
- Graduate Program in Health Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná., 1155, Imaculada Conceição st., Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-90, Brazil
| | | | - Deborah Ribeiro Carvalho
- Graduate Program in Health Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná., 1155, Imaculada Conceição st., Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-90, Brazil
| | - Sérgio Ossamu Ioshii
- Graduate Program in Health Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná., 1155, Imaculada Conceição st., Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-90, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aoki S, Onishi H, Karube M, Yamamoto N, Yamashita H, Shioyama Y, Matsumoto Y, Matsuo Y, Miyakawa A, Matsushita H, Ishikawa H. Comparative Analysis of Photon Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Elderly Patients with Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3633. [PMID: 37509294 PMCID: PMC10377658 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The emergence of an aging society and technological advances have made radiotherapy, especially stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a common alternative to surgery for elderly patients with early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is also an attractive treatment option with potentially lower toxicity for elderly patients with comorbidities. We compared the clinical outcomes of the two modalities using Japanese multicenter data. SBRT (n = 420) and single-fraction CIRT (n = 70) data for patients with stage I NSCLC from 20 centers were retrospectively analyzed. Contiguous patients ≥ 80 years of age were enrolled, and overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local control (LC), and adverse event rates were compared. The median age was 83 years in both groups and the median follow-up periods were 28.5 and 42.7 months for SBRT and CIRT, respectively. The 3-year OS, DSS, and LC rates were 76.0% vs. 72.3% (p = 0.21), 87.5% vs. 81.6% (p = 0.46), and 79.2% vs. 78.2% (p = 0.87), respectively, for the SBRT vs. CIRT groups. Regarding toxicity, 2.9% of the SBRT group developed grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis, whereas none of the CIRT group developed grade ≥ 2 radiation pneumonitis. SBRT and CIRT in elderly patients showed similar survival and LC rates, although CIRT was associated with less severe radiation pneumonitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuri Aoki
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 400-0016, Japan
| | - Masataka Karube
- Department of Radiology, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, Kanagawa 213-8507, Japan
| | - Naoyoshi Yamamoto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Hideomi Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | | | - Yasuo Matsumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata 951-8133, Japan
| | - Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
| | - Akifumi Miyakawa
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Aichi 467-8501, Japan
| | - Haruo Matsushita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ali DM, Leibold A, Harrop J, Sharan A, Vaccaro AR, Sivaganesan A. A Multi-Disciplinary Review of Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: Practical Considerations for Spine Surgery. Global Spine J 2023; 13:823-839. [PMID: 36148695 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221121303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A multi-disciplinary review. OBJECTIVES To provide a roadmap for implementing time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) for spine surgery. This is achieved by organizing and scrutinizing publications in the spine, neurosurgical, and orthopedic literature which utilize TDABC and related methodologies. METHODS PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles. The articles were selected by two independent researchers. After article selection, data was extracted and summarized into research domains. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) systematic review process was followed. RESULTS Of the 524 articles screened, thirty-five articles met the inclusion criteria. Each included article was examined and reviewed to define the primary research question and objective. Comparing different procedures was the most common primary objective. Direct observation along with one other strategy (surveys, interviews, surgical database, or EMR) was most commonly employed during process map development. Across all surgical subspecialties (spine, neurologic, and orthopedic surgery), costs were divided into direct cost, indirect cost, cost to patient, and total costs. The most commonly calculated direct costs included personnel and supply costs. Facility costs, hospital overhead costs, and utilities were the most commonly calculated indirect costs. Transportation costs and parental lost wages were considered when calculating cost to patient. The total cost was a sum of direct costs, indirect costs, and costs to the patient. CONCLUSION TDABC provides a common platform to accurately estimate costs of care delivery. Institutions embarking on TDABC for spine surgery should consider the breadth of methodologies highlighted in this review to determine which type of calculations are appropriate for their practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniyal Mansoor Ali
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 23217Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam Leibold
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 23217Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 23217Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ashwini Sharan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 23217Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander R Vaccaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 23217Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 387400Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ahilan Sivaganesan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 23217Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li B, Hirata E, Trejo JM, Garcia B, Chang B, Malhotra S, Ning M, Sarria GJ. Exploring the Cost of Radiation Therapy Delivery for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in a Public and a Private Center in Latin America Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1205-1216. [PMID: 36922083 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Rayos Contra Cancer, San Francisco, California.
| | - Emily Hirata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Juan Manuel Trejo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru
| | - Bertha Garcia
- Department of Radiotherapy, AUNA Clinica Delgado, Lima, Peru
| | - Betty Chang
- Rayos Contra Cancer, San Francisco, California; University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sameeksha Malhotra
- Rayos Contra Cancer, San Francisco, California; Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, Alabama
| | - Matthew Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gustavo J Sarria
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Department of Radiotherapy, AUNA Clinica Delgado, Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Terlizzi M, Limkin E, Sellami N, Louvel G, Blanchard P. Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100584. [PMID: 36816840 PMCID: PMC9931895 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a standard of care for many localizations but the question of the optimal fractionation remains a matter of concern. If single fraction sessions are routinely used for intracranial targets, their utilization for mobile extracranial lesions is a source of debate and apprehension. Single session treatments improve patient comfort, provide a medico-economic benefit, and have proven useful in the context of the SARS-CoV 2 pandemic. However, both technical and radiobiological uncertainties remain. Experience from intracranial radiosurgery has shown that the size of the target, its proximity to organs at risk, tumor histology, and the volume of normal tissue irradiated are all determining factors in the choice of fractionation. The literature on the use of single fraction for extracranial sites is still scarce. Only primary and secondary pulmonary tumors have been evaluated in prospective randomized trials, allowing the integration of these fractionation schemes in daily practice, for highly selected cases and in trained teams. The level of evidence for the other organs is mainly based on dose escalation or retrospective trials and calls for caution, with further studies being needed before routine use in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
6
|
Huebschmann AG, Trinkley KE, Gritz M, Glasgow RE. Pragmatic considerations and approaches for measuring staff time as an implementation cost in health systems and clinics: key issues and applied examples. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:44. [PMID: 35428326 PMCID: PMC9013046 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00292-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As the field of implementation science wrestles with the need for system decision-makers to anticipate the budget impact of implementing new programs, there has been a push to report implementation costs more transparently. For this purpose, the method of time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) has been heralded as a pragmatic advance. However, a recent TDABC review found that conventional methods for estimating staff time remain resource-intensive and called for simpler alternatives. Our objective was to conceptually compare conventional and emerging TDABC approaches to measuring staff time. Methods Our environmental scan of TDABC methods identified several categories of approaches for staff time estimation; across these categories, staff time was converted to cost as a pro-rated fraction of salary/benefits. Conventional approaches used a process map to identify each step of program delivery and estimated the staff time used at each step in one of 3 ways: (a) uniform estimates of time needed for commonly occurring tasks (self-report), (b) retrospective “time diary” (self-report), or (c) periodic direct observation. In contrast, novel semi-automated electronic health record (EHR) approaches “nudge” staff to self-report time for specific process map step(s)—serving as a contemporaneous time diary. Also, novel EHR-based automated approaches include timestamps to track specific steps in a process map. We compared the utility of these TDABC approach categories according to the 5 R’s model that measures domains of interest to system decision-makers: relevance, rapidity, rigor, resources, and replicability, and include two illustrative case examples. Results The 3 conventional TDABC staff time estimation methods are highly relevant to settings but have limited rapidity, variable rigor, are rather resource-intensive, and have varying replicability. In contrast to conventional TDABC methods, the semi-automated and automated EHR-based approaches have high rapidity, similar rigor, similar replicability, and are less resource-intensive, but have varying relevance to settings. Conclusions This synthesis and evaluation of conventional and emerging methods for staff time estimation by TDABC provides the field of implementation science with options beyond the current approaches. The field remains pressed to innovatively and pragmatically measure costs of program delivery that rate favorably across all of the 5 R’s domains.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ning MS, Boyce-Fappiano D, Thaker NG. Oligometastatic Disease in Context of the Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model: Implications for Local Consolidative Therapy. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:773-776. [PMID: 34767465 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Ning
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patel RR, Verma V, Barsoumian HB, Ning MS, Chun SG, Tang C, Chang JY, Lee PP, Gandhi S, Balter P, Dunn JD, Chen D, Puebla-Osorio N, Cortez MA, Welsh JW. Use of Multi-Site Radiation Therapy for Systemic Disease Control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:352-364. [PMID: 32798606 PMCID: PMC10644952 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic cancer is a heterogeneous entity, some of which could benefit from local consolidative radiation therapy (RT). Although randomized evidence is growing in support of using RT for oligometastatic disease, a highly active area of investigation relates to whether RT could benefit patients with polymetastatic disease. This article highlights the preclinical and clinical rationale for using RT for polymetastatic disease, proposes an exploratory framework for selecting patients best suited for these types of treatments, and briefly reviews potential challenges. The goal of this hypothesis-generating review is to address personalized multimodality systemic treatment for patients with metastatic cancer. The rationale for using high-dose RT is primarily for local control and immune activation in either oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease. However, the primary application of low-dose RT is to activate distinct antitumor immune pathways and modulate the tumor stroma in efforts to better facilitate T cell infiltration. We explore clinical cases involving high- and low-dose RT to demonstrate the potential efficacy of such treatment. We then group patients by extent of disease burden to implement high- and/or low-dose RT. Patients with low-volume disease may receive high-dose RT to all sites as part of an oligometastatic paradigm. Subjects with high-volume disease (for whom standard of care remains palliative RT only) could be treated with a combination of high-dose RT to a few sites for immune activation, while receiving low-dose RT to several remaining lesions to enhance systemic responses from high-dose RT and immunotherapy. We further discuss how emerging but speculative concepts such as immune function may be integrated into this approach and examine therapies currently under investigation that may help address immune deficiencies. The review concludes by addressing challenges in using RT for polymetastatic disease, such as concerns about treatment planning workflows, treatment times, dose constraints for multiple-isocenter treatments, and economic considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshal R Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hampartsoum B Barsoumian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew S Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen G Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Percy P Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Saumil Gandhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Peter Balter
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joe Dan Dunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dawei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nahum Puebla-Osorio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Maria Angelica Cortez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dziemianowicz M, Burmeister J, Dominello M. Examining the Financial Impact of Altered Fractionation in Breast Cancer: An Analysis Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:245-251. [PMID: 33476840 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Value-based care is increasingly informing treatment decisions in radiation oncology. Although reimbursement differences have been examined for accelerated whole breast irradiation (AWBI) and conventional whole breast irradiation (CWBI), the cost of care delivery is poorly understood. This article describes our experience evaluating costs for altered fractionation in early-stage breast cancer using a time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) model. METHODS AND MATERIALS Process maps were developed for 2 treatment regimens, AWBI (42.5 Gy in 16 fractions + 10 Gy in 4 fractions boost) and CWBI (50 Gy in 25 fractions + 10 Gy in 5 fractions boost). Cost was determined based on aggregate cost of personnel, materials, equipment, space, and utilities per unit time and based on the relative proportion of capacity used. The total reimbursement for each regimen was calculated as the aggregate of all billable events during a course of radiation therapy, based on the 2019 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services physician fee schedule database. RESULTS The total cost of delivering courses of AWBI and CWBI was $6965 and $9267, respectively, a difference of $2302 (25%). Eighty-six percent of this difference was related to a lower cost of delivering daily treatments. The total reimbursement for AWBI or CWBI was $9665 or $12,908, respectively, a difference of $3243 (25%). Overall, 55% to 60% of total costs were related to personnel, with the remainder related to materials, utilities, space, and equipment. CONCLUSIONS This analysis shows how TDABC can be used to evaluate resource requirements for different radiation therapy fractionation schedules. We found a substantially lower cost for AWBI compared with CWBI, primarily resulting from fewer daily treatments. As the emphasis in health care shifts toward value-based care, TDABC can help identify opportunities to reduce costs and increase clinical efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Dziemianowicz
- Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
| | - Jay Burmeister
- Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Michael Dominello
- Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meeks SL, Shah AP, Sood G, Dvorak T, Zeidan OA, Meeks DT, Kelly P. Effect of Proposed Episode-Based Payment Models on Advanced Radiotherapy Procedures. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 17:e1943-e1948. [PMID: 33170747 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE An episode-based payment model, the Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model (RO-APM), has been proposed for Medicare reimbursement of radiation services provided to oncology patients. RO-APM may have significant impact on reimbursement for specific patient populations. METHODS This investigation compares historical fee-for-service technical reimbursement estimates at a large hospital-based system to the RO-APM for advanced radiotherapy treatment of specific cancer types. These advanced techniques, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), online-adaptive SBRT, and proton therapy, were specifically chosen because they are resource intensive and are correspondingly among the most expensive radiation oncology procedures. A total of 203 Medicare patients were analyzed. RESULTS RO-APM base-rate reimbursements were similar for SRS and were 38%-47% higher for SBRT. The proposed rates were 1%-31% lower for online-adaptive SBRT, and 48%-71% lower for proton therapy. CONCLUSION These data suggest that the RO-APM may have the desired effect of encouraging shorter courses of radiotherapy, such as SBRT. However, emerging technologies that require large capital and operating investments may see an overall significant reduction in proposed reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanford L Meeks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL
| | - Amish P Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL
| | - Gaurav Sood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL
| | - Tomas Dvorak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL
| | - Omar A Zeidan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL
| | - Dylan T Meeks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL
| | - Patrick Kelly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL
| |
Collapse
|