Racial differences in patterns of care among medicaid-enrolled patients with breast cancer

Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Insured Black and White Breast Cancer Survivors: Exploring Adherence Measures in Patient Data

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is a critical therapy in that it improves survival in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), but adherence to AET is suboptimal. The purpose of this study was to fill scientific gaps about predictors of adherence to AET among black and white women diagnosed with BC.

OBJECTIVE

To assess AET adherence in black and white insured women using multiple measures, including one that uses an innovative statistical approach.

METHODS

Black and white women newly diagnosed with HR+ BC were identified from 2 health maintenance organizations. Pharmacy records captured the type of oral AET prescriptions and all fill dates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of adherence defined in terms of proportion of days covered (PDC; ≥ 80%) and medication gap of ≤ 10 days. A zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression model was used to identify variables associated with the total number of days of medication gaps.

RESULTS

1,925 women met inclusion criteria. 80% were PDC adherent (> 80%); 44% had a medication gap of ≤ 10 days; and 24% had no medication gap days. Race and age were significant in all multivariable models. Black women were less likely to be adherent based on PDC than white women (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.57-0.90, P < 0.01), and they were less likely to have a medication gap of ≤ 10 days (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.54-0.79, P < 0.001). Women aged 25-49 years were less likely to be PDC adherent than women aged 65-93 years (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.48-0.87, P < 0.001). In the ZINB model, women were without their medication for an average of 37 days (SD = 50.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities in adherence to AET in the study highlight a need for interventions among insured women. Using various measures of adherence may help better understand this multidimensional concept. There might be benefits from using both more common dichotomous measures (e.g., PDC) and integrating novel statistical approaches to allow tailoring adherence to patterns within a specific sample.

DISCLOSURES

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01CA154848). It was also supported in part by the NIH-NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA016059, the Laboratory of Telomere Health P30 CA51008, and the TSA Award No. UL1TR002649 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The contents of this study are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent official views of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences or the National Institutes of Health. Bosworth reports grants from Sanofi, Otsuka, Johnson & Johnson, and Blue Cross/Blue Shield of NC and consulting fees from Sanofi and Otsuka. The other authors have nothing to disclose. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy reasons but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The author does not own these data. Data use was granted to the author as part of a data use agreement between specific agencies and organizations.

Racial/ethnic differences in the utilization of chemotherapy among stage I-III breast cancer patients, stratified by subtype: Findings from ten National Program of Cancer Registries states

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to examine racial/ethnic differences in chemotherapy utilization by breast cancer subtype.

METHODS

Data on female non-Hispanic white (NHW), non-Hispanic black (NHB), and Hispanic stage I-III breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2011 were obtained from a project to enhance population-based National Program of Cancer Registry data for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) were used to classify subtypes: HR+/HER2-; HR+/HER2+; HR-/HER2-; and HR-/HER2 + . We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association of race/ethnicity with three outcomes: chemotherapy (yes, no), neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (yes, no), and delayed chemotherapy (yes, no). Covariates included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, other cancer treatment, and participating states/areas.

RESULTS

The study included 25,535 patients (72.1% NHW, 13.7% NHB, and 14.2% Hispanics). NHB with HR+/HER2- (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.42) and Hispanics with HR-/HER2- (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.15-2.28) were more likely to receive chemotherapy than their NHW counterparts. Both NHB and Hispanics were more likely to receive delayed chemotherapy than NHW, and the pattern was consistent across each subtype. No racial/ethnic differences were found in the receipt of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to NHW with the same subtype, NHB with HR+/HER2- and Hispanics with HR-/HER2- have higher odds of using chemotherapy; however, they are more likely to receive delayed chemotherapy, regardless of subtype. Whether the increased chemotherapy use among NHB with HR+/HER2- indicates overtreatment needs further investigation. Interventions to improve the timely chemotherapy among NHB and Hispanics are warranted.

Variations in Guideline-Concordant Breast Cancer Adjuvant Therapy in Rural Georgia

OBJECTIVE

To examine factors associated with guideline-concordant adjuvant therapy among breast cancer patients in a rural region of the United States and to present an advancement in quality-of-care assessment in the context of multiple treatments.

DATA SOURCES

Chart abstraction on initial therapy received by 868 women diagnosed with primary, invasive, early-stage breast cancer in a largely rural region of southwest Georgia.

STUDY DESIGN

Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined predictors of adjuvant chemo-, radiation, and hormonal therapy regimens defined as guideline-concordant according to the 2000 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Overall, 35.2 percent of women received guideline-concordant care for all three adjuvant therapies. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with receiving guideline-concordant care for all three adjuvant therapies jointly, and for chemotherapy. Compared with private insurance, having Medicaid was associated with guideline-concordant chemotherapy. Unmarried women were more likely to be nonconcordant for chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Increased age predicted nonconcordance for adjuvant therapies jointly, for chemotherapy, and for hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of factors were independently associated with receiving guideline-concordant adjuvant therapy. Identifying and addressing factors that lead to nonconcordance may reduce disparities in treatment and survival.

Patterns of locoregional treatment for nonmetastatic breast cancer by patient and health system factors

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine local definitive therapy for nonmetastatic breast cancer with the Patterns of Care Breast and Prostate Cancer (POCBP) study of the National Program of Cancer Registries (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

METHODS

POCBP medical record data were re-abstracted in 7 state/regional registry systems (Georgia, North Carolina, Kentucky, Louisiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and California) to verify data quality and assess treatment patterns in the population. National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice treatment guidelines were aligned with American Joint Committee on Cancer staging at diagnosis to appraise care.

RESULTS

Six thousand five hundred five of 9142 patients with registry-confirmed breast cancer were coded as having primary disease with stage 0 to IIIA tumors and were included in the study. Approximately 88% received guideline-concordant locoregional treatment. However, this outcome varied by age group: 92% of women < age 50 versus 80% of women ≥ age 70 years old received guideline care (P < 0.01). Characteristics that best discriminated receipt (no/yes) of guideline-concordant care in receiver operating curve analyses were the receipt of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy (C = 0.70), patient age (C = 0.62), a greater tumor stage (C = 0.60), public insurance (C = 0.58), and the presence of at least mild comorbidity (C = 0.55). Radiation therapy (RT) after BCS was the most omitted treatment component causing nonconcordance in the study population. In multivariate regression, the effects of the treatment facility, ductal carcinoma in situ, race, and comorbidity on nonconcordant care differed by age group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of underuse of standard therapies for breast cancer vary by age group and BCS use, with which there is a risk of omission of RT.

Adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy and its relationship to breast cancer recurrence and survival among low-income women

OBJECTIVES

Although clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of adjuvant hormonal therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, it is not known whether poor medication adherence might impact outcomes, particularly in the context of a low-income population traditionally underrepresented in clinical trials. We explored the relationship between adherence to tamoxifen or selective aromatase inhibitors with cancer recurrence and death in a low-income, Medicaid-insured population.

METHODS

Using a Medicaid claims-tumor registry and National Death Index data, we evaluated adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy [defined by the medication possession ratio (MPR)], cancer recurrence, and cancer-specific survival for female breast cancer diagnosed from 1998 to 2002, in North Carolina. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression models were used to examine the role of adherence on cancer recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 857 cases, mean age 67.7 years, 56.9% white, 60.9% local stage, with a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. Mean first-year MPR was 77%. MPR adherence was not significantly associated with cancer-related death [adjusted hazards ratio=1.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.54-2.59)], or recurrence [adjusted odds ratio=1.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-2.84)]. There was also no significant interaction between adherence and use of concurrent CYP2D6 enzyme inhibitors.

DISCUSSION

Hormonal therapy adherence was not associated with breast cancer outcomes in this low-income population with relatively poor adherence. Although suboptimal adherence is considered to be an important clinical problem, its effects on breast cancer outcomes may be masked by patient genetic profiles, tumor characteristics, and behavioral factors.

Treatment patterns among medicaid-eligible women with breast cancer in georgia: are patterns different under the breast and cervical cancer prevention and treatment act?

PURPOSE

To investigate breast cancer treatment of patients enrolled under traditional Medicaid categories versus those in the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act (BCCPTA) in Georgia.

METHODS

Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry linked to Medicaid enrollment files were used to identify 2,048 enrollees with a primary cancer of the breast, of whom 1,046 were enrolled in BCCPTA, 674 were disabled, and 328 were in other Medicaid eligibility groups. Logistic regressions were used to estimate factors associated with the odds of receiving lumpectomy, mastectomy, or other surgery in addition to any drug regimen (hormonal or chemotherapy) and radiation.

RESULTS

Women in BCCPTA were more likely to receive any treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 4.71; 95% CI, 2.48 to 8.96), any drug regimen (OR = 3.58; 95% CI, 2.32 to 5.51), any radiation (OR = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.15to 2.24), and any definitive surgery (OR = 2.52; 95% CI, 1.74 to 3.66) than the "other" eligibility group after controlling for covariates. There were no significant differences by eligibility group in the receipt of a lumpectomy versus a mastectomy. However, women in BCCPTA were more likely to receive more adjuvant follow-up after a mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

The BCCPTA program in Georgia appears to create a quicker pathway for low-income, previously uninsured women with breast cancer to access services and, in turn, receive more treatment than women enrolled in the other, more traditional Medicaid eligibility groups. Yet the overall rate of adjuvant therapy, whether radiation, hormonal, or chemotherapy, appears to fall short of national criteria. This deserves attention in Georgia and, most likely, Medicaid programs in other states as well.

Adjuvant Radiation and Outcomes After Breast Conserving Surgery in Publicly Insured Patients

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic studies report that lack of adjuvant radiation (RT) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is associated with higher short-term mortality. It is generally accepted that adjuvant RT decreases risk of breast cancer recurrence and thereby lowers long-term mortality; here, we explore reasons for its relationship to short-term mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 1,583 publically insured women who had BCS between 1998 and 2002 (mean 71.8 years, range 27-101), of whom 1,346 (85%) received RT. Multivariate analyses with Cox Proportional Hazards and Logistic Regression models included: age; race; comorbidity; insurance status; tumor size; number of nodes positive; hormone receptor status; receipt of radiation; adjuvant chemotherapy; preventive care - including mammography, Pap smear and primary care visits; and hospitalization. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 52.8 months, overall mortality was significantly lower in those who received RT (HR 0.45, p<0.0001) and higher with older age (HR 1.05, p<0.0001) and greater comorbidity (HR 1.16, p=0.0007). Local recurrence was less with receipt of optimal radiation (HR 0.47; p=0.03). Breast cancer event, as determined by a clinically logical algorithm to detect breast cancer recurrence and death, however, was not significantly associated with receipt of RT (OR 1.32, p=0.2). CONCLUSION: These results imply that the higher short-term mortality in women not receiving RT after BCS is related to factors other than breast cancer recurrence.

Black-white differences in receipt and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy among breast cancer patients in a rural region of the US

Recent breast cancer treatment studies conducted in large urban settings have reported racial disparities in the appropriate use of adjuvant chemotherapy. This article presents the first focused evaluation of black-white differences in receipt and completion of chemotherapy for breast cancer in a primarily rural region of the United States. We performed chart abstraction on initial therapy received by 868 women diagnosed with Stages I, IIA, IIB, or IIIA breast cancer in 2001-2003 in southwest Georgia (SWGA). For chemotherapy, information collected included treatment plan, dates of delivery, concordance between therapy planned and received, and date and reasons for end of treatment. The patient's age at diagnosis, race, marital status, insurance coverage, hormone receptor status, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, urban/rural status, treatment site, and distance to the site were also collected. Following univariate analyses, we used multivariable logistic regression modeling to examine the impact of race on the likelihood of (1) receiving chemotherapy and (2) completing planned chemotherapy. For patients terminating chemotherapy prematurely, the reasons were documented. The results showed that the unadjusted black-white difference in receipt of chemotherapy (48.3 vs. 36.0%) was significant, but in the multivariable analysis the black-white odds ratio (OR = 1.18) was not. While the unadjusted black-white difference (92.0 vs. 87.8%) in completing chemotherapy was not significant, in multivariable models black race was positively associated with completing care (p ranging from 0.032 to 0.087 and OR, correspondingly, from 2.16 to 2.64). The impact of race on completing chemotherapy was influenced by marital status, with a significant black-white difference for patients not married (OR = 4.67), but no difference for those married (OR = 1.06). We find compelling racial differences in this largely rural region-with black breast cancer patients receiving or completing chemotherapy at rates that equal or exceed white patients. Further investigation is warranted, both in SWGA and in other rural regions.

Discontinuation of radiation treatment among medicaid-enrolled women with local and regional stage breast cancer

For women with nonmetastatic breast cancer, radiation therapy is recommended as a necessary component of the breast conserving surgery (BCS) treatment option. The degree to which Medicaid-enrolled women complete recommended radiation therapy protocols is not known. We evaluate radiation treatment completion rates for Medicaid enrollees aged 18-64 diagnosed with breast cancer. We determine clinical and socio-demographic factors associated with not starting treatment, and with interruptions or not completing radiation treatment. Using data from the Washington State Cancer Registry linked to Medicaid enrollment and claims records, we identified Medicaid enrollees diagnosed with breast cancer from 1997 to 2003 who received BCS. Among the 402 women who met inclusion criteria, 105 (26%) did not receive any radiation. Factors significantly associated with not receiving radiation included in situ disease and non-English as a primary language. Among those who received at least one radiation treatment, 65 (22%) failed to complete therapy and 71 (24%) patients had at least one 5 to 30 day gap in treatment. We found no significant predictors of interruptions in treatment or early discontinuation. A substantial proportion of Medicaid-insured women who are eligible for radiation therapy following BCS either fail to receive any treatment, experience significant interruptions during therapy, or do not complete a minimum course of treatment. More effort is needed to ensure this vulnerable population receives adequate radiation following BCS.

Adjuvant hormonal therapy use among insured, low-income women with breast cancer

PURPOSE Use of adjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly decreases breast cancer mortality, has not been well described among poor women, who are at higher risk of cancer-related death. Here we explore use of adjuvant hormonal therapy in an insured, low-income population. METHODS A North Carolina Cancer Registry-Medicaid linked data set was used. Women with hormone receptor-positive or unknown, nonmetastatic breast cancer, diagnosed between 1998 and 2002, were included. Main outcomes were (1) prescription fill within 1 year of diagnosis, (2) adherence (medication possession ratio), and (3) persistence (absence of a 90-day gap in prescription fills over 12 months). Results The population consisted of 1,491 women (mean age, 67 years). Sixty-four percent filled prescriptions. Predictors of prescription fill included the following: older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; P = .017), greater number of prescription medications (OR, 1.06; P < .001), nonmarried status (OR, 1.82; P = .001), higher stage (OR, 1.83; P < .001), positive hormone receptor status (positive v unknown, OR, 1.98; P < .001), not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (OR, 1.74; P = .001), receipt of adjuvant radiation (OR, 1.55; P = .004), and treatment in a small hospital (OR, 1.49; P = .024). Adherence and persistence rates were 60% and 80%, respectively. Nonmarried status predicted greater adherence (OR, 1.90; P = .006) and persistence (OR, 1.75; P = .031). CONCLUSION Prescription fill, adherence, and persistence to adjuvant hormonal therapy among socioeconomically disadvantaged women are low. Improving use of adjuvant hormonal therapy may lead to lower breast cancer-specific mortality in this population.