1
|
Schwander B, Klesper K, Rossol S, Herrmann K, Zoellner YF. Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analyses of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy versus Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab from a German Statutory Health Insurance Perspective. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 16:483-492. [PMID: 38859889 PMCID: PMC11164086 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s461798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare personalized dosimetry with yttrium-90 (90Y)-loaded glass microspheres (SIRT) vs atezolizumab and bevacizumab (A+B) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment in terms of cost-effectiveness and budget impact from a German statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective. Patients and Methods Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and budget impact analysis (BIA) models were developed in MS Excel. The available key studies (IMbrave150 and DOSISPHERE-01) suggest that both strategies are comparable in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival in HCC, but a difference in severe adverse events (SAE) in favor of SIRT was observed. Accordingly, the CEA model investigates the endpoints "cost per SAE avoided" and "cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained", whereas the BIA simulates the impact of a stepwise re-allocation of current market share to the option which emerges as more cost-effective from the CEA. Results The model suite estimated a mean annual total per-patient costs of € 29,984 for SIRT, compared to € 75,725 for A+B. SIRT was associated with a lower number of SAE and a higher number of QALYs compared to A+B. Switching additionally 25% of the eligible patients (≈500) from systemic therapy to SIRT could generate annual savings of approximately € 22.6 million Euros to the SHI. Conclusion SIRT was identified as dominant treatment strategy. SIRT use not only saves SHI expenditure compared to systemic immunotherapy but also yields extra QALYs. This positions SIRT as the dominant and more cost-effective treatment strategy for patients with HCC. The savings to the SHI system, derived from the BIA conducted, become increasingly significant with rising adoption rates of SIRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjoern Schwander
- Department of Health Economics & Outcomes Research, AHEAD GmbH, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Klesper
- Department of Health Economics & Epidemiology, ECON-EPI, Meerbusch, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Siegbert Rossol
- Medical Clinic, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt a.M., Hessen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - York Francis Zoellner
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okazaki S, Shibuya K, Shiba S, Takura T, Ohno T. Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101441. [PMID: 38778825 PMCID: PMC11110039 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is a treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that results in better outcomes with fewer side effects despite its high cost. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CIRT for HCC from medical and economic perspectives by comparing CIRT and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with localized HCC who were ineligible for surgery or radiofrequency ablation. Methods and Materials This study included 34 patients with HCC who underwent either CIRT or TACE at Gunma University between 2007 and 2016. Patient characteristics were employed to select each treatment group using the propensity score matching method. Life years were used as the outcome indicator. The CIRT technical fee was ¥3,140,000; however, a second CIRT treatment on the same organ within 2 years was performed for free. Results Our study showed that CIRT was dominant over TACE, as the CIRT group had a higher life year (point estimate, 2.75 vs 2.41) and lower total cost (mean, ¥4,974,278 vs ¥5,284,524). We conducted a sensitivity analysis to validate the results because of the higher variance in medical costs in the TACE group, which demonstrated that CIRT maintained its cost effectiveness with a high acceptability rate. Conclusions CIRT is a cost-effective treatment option for localized HCC cases unsuitable for surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shohei Okazaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Ota, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Shintaro Shiba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Takura
- Department of Health Care Services Management, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Healthcare Economics and Health Policy, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Decharatanachart P, Pan-ngum W, Peeraphatdit T, Tanpowpong N, Tangkijvanich P, Treeprasertsuk S, Rerknimitr R, Chaiteerakij R. Cost-Utility Analysis of Non-Contrast Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Cirrhosis. Gut Liver 2024; 18:135-146. [PMID: 37560799 PMCID: PMC10791494 DOI: 10.5009/gnl230089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Ultrasonography has a low sensitivity for detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. Non-contrast abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) demonstrated a comparable performance to that of magnetic resonance imaging without the risk of contrast media exposure and at a lower cost than that of full diagnostic MRI. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of non-contrast aMRI for HCC surveillance in cirrhotic patients, using ultrasonography with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a reference. Methods Cost-utility analysis was performed using a Markov model in Thailand and the United States. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in each strategy. Surveillance protocols were considered cost-effective based on a willingness-to-pay value of $4,665 (160,000 Thai Baht) in Thailand and $50,000 in the United States. Results aMRI was cost-effective in both countries with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $3,667/QALY in Thailand and $37,062/QALY in the United States. Patient-level microsimulations showed consistent findings that aMRI was cost-effective in both countries. By probabilistic sensitivity analysis, aMRI was found to be more cost-effective than combined ultrasonography and AFP with a probability of 0.77 in Thailand and 0.98 in the United States. By sensitivity analyses, annual HCC incidence was revealed as the most influential factor affecting cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of aMRI increased in settings with a higher HCC incidence. At a higher HCC incidence, aMRI would remain cost-effective at a higher aMRI-to-ultrasonography with AFP cost ratio. Conclusions Compared to ultrasonography with AFP, non-contrast aMRI is a cost-effective strategy for HCC surveillance and may be useful for such surveillance in cirrhotic patients, especially in those with high HCC risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wirichada Pan-ngum
- Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thoetchai Peeraphatdit
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Natthaporn Tanpowpong
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pisit Tangkijvanich
- Center of Excellence in Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sombat Treeprasertsuk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Center of Excellence for Innovation and Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Roongruedee Chaiteerakij
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Center of Excellence for Innovation and Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel MV, Davies H, Williams AO, Bromilow T, Baker H, Mealing S, Holmes H, Anderson N, Ahmed O. Transarterial therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma eligible for transarterial embolization: a US cost-effectiveness analysis. J Med Econ 2023; 26:1061-1071. [PMID: 37632520 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2248840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and drug-eluting beads chemoembolization (DEE-TACE) for patients with unresectable early- to intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). DESIGN A cohort-based Markov model with a five-year time horizon was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the three embolization treatments. Upon entering the model, patients with HCC received either TARE or one of the two other embolization treatments. Patients remained in a "watch and wait" state for tumor downstaging that allowed them to move to health states such as liver transplant, resection, systemic therapies, or cure. Clinical input parameters were retrieved from the published literature, and where values could not be sourced, assumptions were made and validated by clinical experts. Health benefits were quantified using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost input parameters were obtained from various sources, including the Medicare Cost Report, IBM® Micromedex RED BOOK, and published literature. RESULTS At five years, TARE was found to be cost-saving (saving $15,779 per person compared to cTACE) and produced 0.33 more QALYs per person than cTACE. TARE cost $13,696 more but produced 0.33 more QALYs than DEE-TACE, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $41,474 per QALY gained at five years. After accounting for parameter uncertainty, the likelihood of TARE being cost-effective was at least 90% against all comparators at a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS TARE produces more QALYs than cTACE and DEE-TACE, with a high probability of being cost-effective against both comparators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikin V Patel
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Heather Davies
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | | | - Tom Bromilow
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Hannah Baker
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Stuart Mealing
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Hayden Holmes
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | | | - Osman Ahmed
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prediction of Lung Shunt Fraction for Yttrium-90 Treatment of Hepatic Tumors Using Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI with Quantitative Perfusion Processing. Tomography 2022; 8:2687-2697. [PMID: 36412683 PMCID: PMC9680251 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8060224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
There is no noninvasive method to estimate lung shunting fraction (LSF) in patients with liver tumors undergoing Yttrium-90 (Y90) therapy. We propose to predict LSF from noninvasive dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI using perfusion quantification. Two perfusion quantification methods were used to process DCE MRI in 25 liver tumor patients: Kety's tracer kinetic modeling with a delay-fitted global arterial input function (AIF) and quantitative transport mapping (QTM) based on the inversion of transport equation using spatial deconvolution without AIF. LSF was measured on SPECT following Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) administration via hepatic arterial catheter. The patient cohort was partitioned into a low-risk group (LSF ≤ 10%) and a high-risk group (LSF > 10%). Results: In this patient cohort, LSF was positively correlated with QTM velocity |u| (r = 0.61, F = 14.0363, p = 0.0021), and no significant correlation was observed with Kety's parameters, tumor volume, patient age and gender. Between the low LSF and high LSF groups, there was a significant difference for QTM |u| (0.0760 ± 0.0440 vs. 0.1822 ± 0.1225 mm/s, p = 0.0011), and Kety's Ktrans (0.0401 ± 0.0360 vs 0.1198 ± 0.3048, p = 0.0471) and Ve (0.0900 ± 0.0307 vs. 0.1495 ± 0.0485, p = 0.0114). The area under the curve (AUC) for distinguishing between low LSF and high LSF was 0.87 for |u|, 0.80 for Ve and 0.74 for Ktrans. Noninvasive prediction of LSF is feasible from DCE MRI with QTM velocity postprocessing.
Collapse
|
6
|
Brown AM, Kassab I, Massani M, Townsend W, Singal AG, Soydal C, Moreno‐Luna L, Roberts LR, Chen VL, Parikh ND. TACE versus TARE for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall and individual patient level meta analysis. Cancer Med 2022; 12:2590-2599. [PMID: 35943116 PMCID: PMC9939158 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is increasingly used as an alternative to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to perform an overall and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of studies comparing TACE and TARE. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search using pre-specified keywords with the aid of an informationist for articles from inception to 3/2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). RESULTS Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria with 2465 unique patients, with one randomized trial, 4 prospective studies and 12 retrospective studies. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B (42.8%) was the most common stage followed by BCLC A (30.3%) and BCLC C (29.0%). There was no difference in OS between the two modalities (-0.55 months, 95% CI -1.95 to 3.05). In three studies with available TTP data, TARE resulted in a longer TTP than TACE (mean TTP 17.5 vs. 9.8 months; mean TTP difference 4.8 months, 95% CI 1.3-8.3 months). IPD-level meta-analysis of 311 patients from three studies showed no difference in overall OS between the two modalities including among subgroups stratified by tumor stage and liver function. Limitations of the current literature include inconsistent length of follow-up, inconsistency in response criteria, and safety reporting. CONCLUSIONS Current data suggest TARE provides significantly longer TTP than TACE, although the two treatments do not significantly differ in terms of OS. Given limitations of the current data, there is rationale for prospective studies comparing these modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M. Brown
- Division of Gastroenterology and University of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Ihab Kassab
- Division of Gastroenterology and University of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | | | - Whitney Townsend
- Division of Gastroenterology and University of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Amit G. Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver DiseasesUniversity of Texas SouthwesternDallasTexasUSA
| | - Cigdem Soydal
- Department of Nuclear MedicineAnkara University Medical SchoolAnkaraTurkey
| | - Laura Moreno‐Luna
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Lewis R. Roberts
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Vincent L. Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and University of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Neehar D. Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and University of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alonso JC, Casans I, González FM, Fuster D, Rodríguez A, Sánchez N, Oyagüez I, Burgos R, Williams AO, Espinoza N. Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:326. [PMID: 35780112 PMCID: PMC9250253 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02396-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 microspheres is a clinically effective therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the available economic evaluations of TARE for the treatment of HCC. Methods The Preferred Reported Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was followed by applying a search strategy across six databases. All studies identified as economic evaluations with TARE for HCC treatment in English or Spanish language were considered. Costs were adjusted using the 2020 US dollars based on purchasing-power-parity ($US PPP). Results Among 423 records screened, 20 studies (6 cost-analyses, 3 budget-impact-analyses, 2 cost-effectiveness-analyses, 8 cost-utility-analyses, and 1 cost-minimization analysis) met the pre-defined criteria for inclusion. Thirteen studies were published from the European perspective, six from the United States, and one from the Canadian perspectives. The assessed populations included early- (n = 4), and intermediate-advanced-stages patients (n = 15). Included studies were evaluated from a payer perspective (n = 20) and included both payer and social perspective (n = 2). TARE was compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in nine studies or sorafenib (n = 11). The life-years gained (LYG) differed by comparator: TARE versus TACE (range: 1.3 to 3.1), and TARE versus sorafenib (range: 1.1 to 2.53). Of the 20 studies, TARE was associated with lower treatment costs in ten studies. The cost of TARE treatment varied widely according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system and ranged from 1311 $US PPP/month (BCLC-A) to 71,890 $US PPP/5-years time horizon (BCLC-C). The incremental cost-utility ratio for TARE versus TACE resulted in a 17,397 $US PPP/Quality-adjusted-Life-Years (QALY), and for TARE versus sorafenib ranged from dominant (more effectiveness and lower cost) to 3363 $US PPP/QALY. Conclusions Economic evaluations of TARE for HCC treatment are heterogeneous. Overall, TARE is a cost-effective short- and long-term therapy for the treatment of intermediate-advanced HCC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02396-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Alonso
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Casans
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - F M González
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Central, Asturias, Spain
| | - D Fuster
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Rodríguez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - N Sánchez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Oyagüez
- Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), P. Joaquín Rodrigo 4 - letra I, 28224, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Burgos
- Boston Scientific Iberia, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - N Espinoza
- Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), P. Joaquín Rodrigo 4 - letra I, 28224, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shankaran V, Chennupati S, Sanchez H, Sun Q, Li L, Fedorenko C, Aly A, Healey M, Seal B. Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Costs and Utilization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Treated at a Large Referral Center in Washington State 2007-2018. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2021; 8:1597-1606. [PMID: 34938673 PMCID: PMC8685386 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s328274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Though the treatment landscape for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved significantly with the refinement of liver-directed therapy techniques and the introduction of new drugs, few studies have investigated the impact of the changing treatment landscape on lifetime treatment costs, particularly in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease. We sought to investigate real-world clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare costs in a cohort of HCC patients treated at a single high-volume institution in Washington (WA) state. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with HCC between 2007 and 2018 using abstracted electronic medical record (EMR) data linked to cancer registry data and health claims from commercial plans, Medicare, and Medicaid. We described clinical and treatment characteristics, including BCLC stage and Child Pugh score. We investigated median survival and mean lifetime treatment costs by BCLC stage using Kaplan-Meier cost estimator methods. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate factors associated with overall survival. Results The final cohort included 215 patients, the majority of whom were white (71%), male (68%), and with underlying hepatitis C (61%). Mean per patient lifetime costs were highest in BCLC A and BCLC C patients. Mean lifetime costs in BCLC A patients ($292,134) was driven by surgery, hospital, pharmacy, imaging, and outpatient costs. Chemotherapy costs were highest in BCLC C patients, though not the predominant area of spending. Median survival was highest in patients with BCLC 0 and A disease; BCLC stage C and higher area deprivation index (ADI) were associated with poorer survival. Conclusion In a cohort of WA state HCC patients, mean lifetime costs were highest in patients with BCLC A disease, attributable to surgery and hospital costs. As increased utilization of newer and less toxic therapies improves survival in BCLC C patients, mean lifetime costs in this group may also rise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veena Shankaran
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shasank Chennupati
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hayley Sanchez
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Qin Sun
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Li Li
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Catherine Fedorenko
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Williams SJ, Rilling WS, White SB. Quality of Life and Cost Considerations: Y-90 Radioembolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:482-487. [PMID: 34629718 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) offers a minimally invasive and safe treatment option for primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies. The benefits of TARE are manifold including prolonged overall survival, low associated morbidities, and improved time to progression allowing prolonged treatment-free intervals. The rapid development of new systemic therapies including immunotherapy has radically changed the treatment landscape for primary and metastatic liver cancer. Given the current climate, it is critical for interventional oncologists to understand the benefits of TARE relative to these other therapies. Therefore, this report aims to review quality-of-life outcomes and the cost comparisons of TARE as compared with systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Williams
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - William S Rilling
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Sarah B White
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pollock RF, Colaone F, Shergill S, Brennan VK, Agirrezabal I. Effects of Trial Population Selection on Quality of Life and Healthcare Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Example in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Radioembolization. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 13:835-841. [PMID: 34588788 PMCID: PMC8473933 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s319857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Quality of life is among the most important considerations in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), arguably second only to overall survival. Measuring and modeling patient quality of life is also crucial in the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of health interventions. In the present study, we aimed to identify cost-utility analyses comparing selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with systemic therapy in patients with unresectable HCC and to compare the modeled incremental quality of life differences between the two therapies. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and health technology assessment agency websites were searched to identify cost–utility studies of SIRT versus systemic therapies in the treatment of HCC. Key characteristics of the studies, modeled populations and incremental quality of life outcomes were extracted from the included studies. Results The systematic literature review retrieved 1140 studies, of which four were ultimately included. Hand searches then identified two distinct analyses, and an updated version of one of the four studies identified initially. From these seven studies, 18 analyses were included. Analyses using data from the overall trial populations reported incremental quality-of-life estimates spanning −0.09 to +0.28 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with that range expanding to −0.09 to +0.60 QALYs when also considering post hoc sub-group analyses. Conclusion The wide range of incremental QALYs, with substantial differences between overall trial populations and subgroups, illustrates the impact that the choice of target population may have on the relative quality of life outcomes of the compared interventions, which may in turn affect clinical decision-making. The small differences also highlight both the importance of reporting measures of dispersion around the findings, and the limitations of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for assessing the relative cost-effectiveness of interventions that are predicted to result in similar quality-of-life outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard F Pollock
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Covalence Research Ltd, London, UK
| | - Fabien Colaone
- Global Health Economics, Pricing, Reimbursement & Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd, London, UK
| | - Suki Shergill
- Global Health Economics, Pricing, Reimbursement & Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd, London, UK
| | - Victoria K Brennan
- Global Health Economics, Pricing, Reimbursement & Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd, London, UK
| | - Ion Agirrezabal
- Global Health Economics, Pricing, Reimbursement & Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bi-Centric Independent Validation of Outcome Prediction after Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Liver Cancer. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163668. [PMID: 34441964 PMCID: PMC8396945 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Yttrium-90 radioembolization (RE) plays an important role in the treatment of liver malignancies. Optimal patient selection is crucial for an effective and safe treatment. In this study, we aim to validate the prognostic performance of a previously established random survival forest (RSF) with an external validation cohort from a different national center. Furthermore, we compare outcome prediction models with different established metrics. METHODS A previously established RSF model, trained on a consecutive cohort of 366 patients who had received RE due to primary or secondary liver tumor at a national center (center 1), was used to predict the outcome of an independent consecutive cohort of 202 patients from a different national center (center 2) and vice versa. Prognostic performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and the integrated Brier score (IBS). The prognostic importance of designated baseline parameters was measured with the minimal depth concept, and the influence on the predicted outcome was analyzed with accumulated local effects plots. RSF values were compared to conventional cox proportional hazards models in terms of C-index and IBS. RESULTS The established RSF model achieved a C-index of 0.67 for center 2, comparable to the results obtained for center 1, which it was trained on (0.66). The RSF model trained on center 2 achieved a C-index of 0.68 on center 2 data and 0.66 on center 1 data. CPH models showed comparable results on both cohorts, with C-index ranging from 0.68 to 0.72. IBS validation showed more differentiated results depending on which cohort was trained on and which cohort was predicted (range: 0.08 to 0.20). Baseline cholinesterase was the most important variable for survival prediction. CONCLUSION The previously developed predictive RSF model was successfully validated with an independent external cohort. C-index and IBS are suitable metrics to compare outcome prediction models, with IBS showing more differentiated results. The findings corroborate that survival after RE is critically determined by functional hepatic reserve and thus baseline liver function should play a key role in patient selection.
Collapse
|