Financial Distress Among Older Adults With Cancer

Influence of age on financial toxicity in cancer patients

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the level of financial toxicity (FT) experienced by the following three age groups of cancer patients in China: young working-aged patients (age < 40 years), middle-aged patients (40-64 years), and older patients (≥ 65 years).

Methods

The data used for this study were collected via a cross-sectional survey conducted in China. FT was assessed using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). ANOVA was used to examine the differences in FT status between age groups. Multivariate linear regression models were employed to assess the association between age and FT, adjusted by socioeconomic and other clinical characteristics.

Results

A total of 556 cancer patients completed the survey. Approximately 54.3% of the participants were male and 45.7% were female. The majority (61.5%) were aged 40-64 years, while 27.7% were aged 65 or older. The mean FT scores for young patients (< 40 years), middle-aged patients (40-64 years), and older patients (≥ 65 years) were 16.7, 12.8, and 12.4, respectively. The results of the regression analysis revealed that, without adjusting for background characteristics, young patients had significantly higher mean COST scores. This suggests they experienced lower levels of FT compared to patients in other age groups. Stratified analysis revealed that, for older patients, only educational level and type of insurance scheme were significant factors in predicting the COST score.

Conclusions

This study provides empirical evidence for developing targeted interventions and policies to reduce the FT for patients in different age groups. Given that FT is complicated, a longitudinal study should be conducted to explore the long-term impact of FT on cancer patients' quality of life and well-being.

Barriers to resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A national and local perspective

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) use for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has increased, but some patients never get resection following NAC.

METHODS

Data from January 2012 to December 2019 for all clinically resectable patients across two health networks were utilized, as well as data from the ACS NCDB registry. Univariate testing, multivariable logistic regression, and survival analyses were employed to evaluate failure to resection after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the 10 007 registry patients eligible for resection, the resected group was younger (64.6 vs. 69.5 years; p < 0.001) and had a slightly lower mean comorbidity index (0.41 vs. 0.45; p < 0.001) than the nonsurgical group. The nonsurgical group was composed of a higher percentage of Black and Hispanic patients (17.5 vs. 13.1%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, the factors associated with decreased probability of resection after NAC were evaluation at a community hospital (OR 2.4), Black or Hispanic race (OR 1.6), areas of increased high school drop-out rates (OR 1.4), and lack of private health insurance (OR 1.3). The median overall survival for nonsurgery was markedly worse than the surgical cohort (10.6 vs. 26.6 months; p < 0.001). The most frequent reasons for a lack of definitive resection were operative upstaging to unresectable (39.6%), patient preference (14.5%), progression on NAC (13.2%), deconditioning or comorbidity severity (12.5%), and nonreferral to a surgeon (8.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial, economic, and educational disparities have a considerable influence on the successful completion of a neoadjuvant approach for resectable PDAC. A comprehensive closed or highly collaborative/communicative multidisciplinary neoadjuvant program is optimal for treatment success and completion.

Mental healthcare access among US adults with vision impairment and depression and/or anxiety symptoms

BACKGROUND

Although individuals with vision impairment are at greater risk for depression and anxiety, there has been limited study of mental healthcare utilization among this population.

OBJECTIVES

To address this gap, this pooled cross-sectional study estimates the prevalence of mental healthcare utilization among individuals with vision impairment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We calculated adjusted relative risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals of depression and/or anxiety symptoms and mental healthcare utilization using multinomial logistic regression, accounting for demographics, social determinants of health, and survey week. The population-based, U.S. Census Bureau Household Pulse Survey was administered April 2021-March 2022. Participants included 800,935 US adults (weighted population: 174,598,530) RESULTS: Adjusting for other factors, adults with vision impairment were more likely to report depression symptoms (RRR: 2.33; 95% CI: 2.03-2.68), anxiety symptoms (RRR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.94-2.33, and comorbid depression and anxiety symptoms (RRR: 3.77; 95% CI: 3.51-4.04) compared with individuals with no vision impairment. Among individuals reporting anxiety or depression symptoms, individuals with vision impairment (RRR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.35-1.59) were more likely to lack of mental healthcare utilization compared with individuals with no vision impairment.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that individuals with vision impairment are at increased risk for depression and/or anxiety symptoms and report reduced mental healthcare utilization compared with individuals without vision impairment. Additional programs and policies are needed to improve mental healthcare utilization among individuals with vision impairment and depression and/or anxiety symptoms, such as increased telehealth accessibility and coordination of behavioral health and ophthalmology services.

A scoping review of racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in the outcomes of older adults with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cancer health disparities are widespread. Nevertheless, the disparities in outcomes among diverse survivors of cancer ages 65 years and older ("older") have not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of original research articles published between January 2016 and September 2023 and indexed in Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. We included studies evaluating racial, ethnic, socioeconomic disadvantaged, geographic, sexual and gender, and/or persons with disabilities disparities in treatment, survivorship, and mortality among older survivors of cancer. We excluded studies with no a priori aims related to a health disparity, review articles, conference proceedings, meeting abstracts, studies with unclear methodologies, and articles in which the disparity group was examined only as an analytic covariate. Two reviewers independently extracted data following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

After searching and removing duplicates, 2573 unique citations remained and after screening 59 articles met the inclusion criteria. Many investigated more than one health disparity, and most focused on racial and ethnic (n = 44) or socioeconomic (n = 25) disparities; only 10 studies described geographic disparities, and none evaluated disparities in persons with disabilities or due to sexual and gender identity. Research investigating disparities in outcomes among diverse older survivors of cancer is increasing gradually-68% of eligible articles were published between 2020 and 2023. Most studies focused on the treatment phase of care (n = 28) and mortality (n = 26), with 16 examined disparities in survivorship, symptoms, or quality of life. Most research was descriptive and lacked analyses of potential underlying mechanisms contributing to the reported disparities.

CONCLUSION

Little research has evaluated the effect of strategies to reduce health disparities among older patients with cancer. This lack of evidence perpetuates cancer inequities and leaves the cancer care system ill equipped to address the unique needs of the rapidly growing and increasingly diverse older adult cancer population.

Longitudinal changes in patient-reported cognitive complaints among older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies - results from the Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) Registry

PURPOSE

Longitudinal change in patient-reported cognitive complaints (CC) in older adults with cancer is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early longitudinal CC and predictors among older adults with cancer.

METHODS

We examined early CC change on the PROMIS® Short Form4a Cognitive Function among adults ≥ 60 years with GI cancer enrolled in the Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) undergoing geriatric assessment (GA) at baseline and one 3-6-month follow-up. Multivariable linear regression examined associations of demographics, socioeconomics, GA domains, baseline cognitive score, and treatment toxicities on follow-up cognitive score. Bayesian analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) determined best fitting model.

RESULTS

A total of 218 participants were included. The median follow-up was 3.7 months, the mean age was 69.2 ± 7.1, and 57.3% were male. The most common cancer was colorectal (30.7%) with most stage III/IV (73.7%). About half (51.8%) had stable cognition baseline to follow-up (follow-up t-score ± 5 points of baseline), 20.6% improved (≥ 5 increase), and 27.5% declined (≥ 5 decrease). After adjustment, there were no significant baseline predictors of follow-up cognitive t-score. Baseline t-score was the best-fitting predictor of follow-up t-score.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study, examining early change in CC among older adults with cancer, ~ 28% exhibited cognitive decline. Baseline cognition is the most important early predictor of follow-up cognition. Longer follow-up is needed to identify long-term predictors of CC change in cancer survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Cognitive decline, even early, may occur in many older adults with cancer. Baseline and regular follow-up assessments of cognitive symptoms are an important component of survivorship care.

Access to Financial Assistance Programs and Their Impact on Overall Spending on Oral Anticancer Medications at an Integrated Specialty Pharmacy

PURPOSE

Financial assistance (FA) programs are increasingly used to help patients afford oral anticancer medications (OAMs), but access to such programs and their impact on out-of-pocket (OOP) spending has not been well explored. This study aimed to (1) characterize the impact of receipt of FA on both OOP spending and likelihood of catastrophic spending on OAMs and (2) evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in access to FA programs.

METHODS

Patients with a cancer diagnosis prescribed an OAM anytime between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021 were included in this retrospective, single-center study at an integrated specialty pharmacy affiliated with a tertiary academic cancer center. Fixed-effect regression models were used to characterize the impact of receipt of FA on overall spending and likelihood of catastrophic spending on OAMs, as well as explore the association of race/ethnicity with receipt of FA.

RESULTS

Across 1,186 patients prescribed an OAM, 37% received FA. Receipt of FA was associated with lower annual spending on OAMs (β = -$1,236 US dollars [USD; 95% CI, -$1,841 to -$658], P < .001) but not reduced risk of catastrophic spending (odds ratio [OR], 0.442 [95% CI, 0.755 to 3.199], P = .23). Non-White patients (OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.85], P = .004) and patients who spoke English as a second language (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.90], P = .02) were less likely to receive FA compared with White and English-speaking patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FA programs can mitigate high OOP spending but not for patients who spend at catastrophic levels. There are racial/ethnic and language disparities in access to such programs. Future studies should evaluate access to FA programs across diverse delivery settings.

The Role of Financial Difficulties as a Mediator between Physical Symptoms and Depression in Advanced Cancer Patients

Financial difficulties experienced by cancer patients negatively impact the mental health of the patients. The objective of this study was to examine the mediating role of financial difficulties between physical symptoms and depression in patients with advanced cancer. A prospective, cross-sectional design was adopted in the study. The data were collected from 861 participants with advanced cancer in 15 different tertiary hospitals in Spain. The participants' socio-demographic characteristics were collected using a standardized self-report form. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to explore the mediating role of financial difficulties. In the results, 24% of patients reported a high level of financial difficulties. Physical symptoms were positively associated with financial difficulties and depression (β = 0.46 and β = 0.43, respectively), and financial difficulties was positively associated with depression (β = 0.26). Additionally, financial difficulties played a role in explaining the relationship between physical symptoms and depression, showing a standardized regression coefficient of 0.43 which decreased to 0.39 after the financial difficulties were controlled. Healthcare professionals should consider the importance of providing financial resources and emotional support to help patients and their families cope with the financial burden associated with cancer treatment and its symptoms.

Association of unmet basic resource needs with frailty and quality of life among older adults with cancer-Results from the CARE registry

BACKGROUND

Basic resource needs related to transportation, housing, food, and medications are important social determinants of health and modifiable indicators of poverty, but their role in modifying the risk of frailty and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains unknown. The goal of our study was to examine the prevalence of unmet basic needs and their association with frailty and HRQoL in a cohort of older adults with cancer.

METHODS

The CARE registry prospectively enrolls older adults (≥60 years) with cancer. Assessments of transportation, housing, and material hardship were added to the CARE tool in 8/2020. The 44-item CARE Frailty Index was used to define frailty, and subdomains of physical and mental HRQoL were assessed using the PROMIS® 10-global. Multivariable analysis examined the association between unmet needs with frailty and HRQoL subdomains, adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

The cohort included 494 participants. Median age of 69 years, 63.6% were male and 20.2% were Non-Hispanic (NH) Black. Unmet basic needs were reported in 17.8% (transportation 11.5%, housing 2.8%, and material hardship 7.5%). Those with unmet needs were more often NH Black (33.0% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.006) and less educated (

CONCLUSIONS

Unmet basic needs represent a novel exposure that is independently associated with frailty and low HRQoL and warrants the development of targeted interventions.

Collapse

Key Words

• aging
• basic resource needs
• cancer
• concrete resource needs
• frailty
• geriatric oncology

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Male
• Aged
• Female
• Quality of Life
• Frailty/epidemiology
• Neoplasms/epidemiology
• Neoplasms/therapy
• Ethnicity
• Registries

Collapse

Grants

• K08 CA234225 NCI NIH HHS
• T32 HS013852 AHRQ HHS
• Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
• National Cancer Institute

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Grant R. Williams Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Mackenzie Fowler Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Smith Giri Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Chen Dai Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Christian Harmon Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Mustafa Al‐Obaidi Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Coryn Stephenson University of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
Kira Bona Division of Population SciencesDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
Wendy Landier Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Smita Bhatia Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Julie Wolfson Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA

Collapse

Care needs of older patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarized current research evidence examining care needs of older patients with advanced cancer in dealing with disease, treatment, and treatment-related side effects. It also identified gaps and directions for future research and practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Older patients with advanced cancer need support from health professionals, family, friends, and other social network members in the management of physical symptoms and functioning, psychosocial and spiritual care, information provision, and practical resolution of daily problems. As older patients are affected by aging-related factors, they usually have unique patterns of care needs compared with younger patients.

SUMMARY

Currently, insufficient research evidence hinders a comprehensive understanding of care needs of older patients with advanced cancer, as well as potential influencing factors. Future efforts are needed to develop more sophisticated assessment methods and interventions to better understand and address care needs of older patients with advanced cancer.

Impact of a Comprehensive Financial Resource on Financial Toxicity in a National, Multiethnic Sample of Adult, Adolescent/Young Adult, and Pediatric Patients With Cancer

PURPOSE

Financial toxicity is a well-recognized problem for patients with cancer. However, a crucial gap remains in describing and implementing mitigation strategies. We conducted a national survey of a multiethnic adolescent/pediatric and adult patient population served by Family Reach, a nonprofit organization focused on removing financial barriers to cancer care, to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive financial resource on patient-reported financial toxicity.

METHODS

An electronic survey was administered to characterize patients' current financial health and the impact of Family Reach's resources on financial toxicity. The survey was e-mailed to all patients or caregivers who received resources from Family Reach between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020. Factors associated with higher financial stress and higher potential impact of resources on financial burden were evaluated through separate multivariate regression models. Qualitative responses were analyzed using manual coding and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty socioeconomically and racially diverse respondents (overall response rate 40%; 46% non-Hispanic White; 48% with incomes below the federal poverty line) completed the survey and were included in the analysis. More than half of respondents reported high financial stress in the previous week. Hispanic ethnicity, Black race, and low annual household income were associated with higher financial toxicity. A greater amount of financial assistance was associated with a higher confidence rating that resources provided would decrease financial stress. In open-ended comments, respondents highlighted the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting job loss on financial toxicity, the importance of financial navigation, the benefits of financial assistance, and anxiety about long-term financial health.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive financial resource, particularly financial assistance, alleviated financial toxicity in a multiethnic national sample of patients with cancer. Ongoing work is critical to address sustainable funding sources and financial navigation to support patients during treatment and survivorship.

Pain among older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies- results from the cancer and aging resilience evaluation (CARE) Registry

PURPOSE

The impact of pain on functional status and mental health among older adults with cancer is a relevant, yet understudied. We sought to identify the prevalence of pain at diagnosis in older adults with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies and evaluate the association of pain with functional status limitations, cognition, and mental health.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study included older adults (age ≥ 60) with GI cancers enrolled in the CARE Registry. Pain measured in numeric rating scale from 0 to 10. We utilized the literature based cutoff for moderate-severe as ≥ 4. Logistic regression used to assess differences in functional status, falls, cognitive complaints, and depression/anxiety associated with moderate/severe pain, adjusted for sex, race, education, ethnicity, marital status, cancer type/stage, and treatment phase.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 714 older adults with an average mean age of 70 years and 59% male. Common diagnoses included colorectal (27.9%) and pancreatic (18%). A total of 43.3% reported moderate/severe pain. After multivariate adjusting for covariates, participants with self-reported moderate/severe pain were more likely to report limitations in instrumental activities of daily living (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.3 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-6.1, p < .001), limitation in activities of daily living (aOR 3.2 95% CI 2.0-5.1, p < .001), cognitive complaints (aOR 2.9 95% CI 1.4-6.0, p < .004), anxiety (aOR 2.2 95% CI 1.4-3.4, p < 0.01), and depression (aOR 3.7 95% CI 2.2-6.5, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain is common among older adults with GI cancers and is associated with functional status limitations, cognitive complaints, and depression/anxiety. Strategies to reduce pain and minimize its potential impact on function and mental health warrant future research.

Impact of lay navigation on utilization and Medicare spending for cancer survivors in the "Deep South"

PURPOSE

Though lay navigation programs have proven beneficial for individuals during cancer treatment, little is known about the effects of lay navigation on health care utilization and Medicare spending among older adults during cancer survivorship.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data to evaluate a lay navigation program implemented from 2012 to 2015 at 12 academic and community cancer centers in the Southeast. Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 years navigated during survivorship were compared to propensity score-matched, non-navigated cancer survivors. Quarterly trends in Medicare spending were estimated using repeated measures mixed models. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using repeated measures generalized linear models for quarterly emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Medicare spending for navigated (n = 3255) versus non-navigated older cancer survivors (n = 3255) was initially higher but declined faster by $513 per patient per quarter (95% CI -$616, -$410). Per patient per quarter risk of ER visits decreased by 11% (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86, 0.92) and hospitalizations decreased by 16% (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.81, 0.88) over time comparing navigated versus non-navigated patients. Similar results were seen for patients enrolled in navigation post-treatment (N = 1893).

CONCLUSIONS

In older cancer survivors receiving care in the Deep South, patients receiving lay navigation compared to those non-navigated had significant reductions in Medicare spending, hospitalizations, and ER visits.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Though much emphasis has been placed on lay navigation during initial cancer treatment, navigation is needed throughout survivorship due to the high costs and health care utilization that persist post-treatment.