Association of Patient Experience With Guideline-Concordant Colon Cancer Treatment in the Elderly

A perspective on the use of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measures in ambulatory healthcare

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are patient reports about their healthcare, whereas patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are reports about their functioning and well-being regarding physical, mental, and social health. We provide a perspective on using PREMs and PROMs in ambulatory healthcare.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a narrative review of the literature about using PREMs and PROMs in research and clinical practice, identified challenges and possibilities for addressing them, and provided suggestions for future research and clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Substantial progress in using PREMs and PROMs has occurred during the last half-century. Collecting and reporting PREMs to clinicians in ambulatory care settings has improved communication with patients, diagnosis, and treatment, which may improve patients' health. Optimal use requires appropriate data analysis, minimizing implementation barriers, and facilitating interpretation of PREMs and PROMs in clinical practice. Also, formal structures and processes that include patient and family input into care improvement are needed (e.g. patient and family advisory councils as partners in co-design and coproduction of quality improvement). PREMs and PROMs have been used primarily in more affluent countries (e.g. the United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Japan, and Portugal), but this is expected to increase in many countries.

Factors Associated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy Noncompliance and Survival in Older Adults With Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard management of stage III colon cancer includes surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite improved overall survival with adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer, it is reportedly underused in older adults. To date, no contemporary national analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy use and its impact on older adults with stage III colon cancer exists.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the current use of adjuvant chemotherapy in older adults with stage III colon cancer and determine factors associated with noncompliance.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

Conducted using the National Cancer Database.

PATIENTS

This study included patients aged 65 years and older undergoing curative resection for stage III colon adenocarcinomas, 2010-2017.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adjuvant chemotherapy use, factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy use, and overall survival with and without adjuvant chemotherapy in older adults with pathologic stage III disease.

RESULTS

Of 64,608 patients included, 64.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly independently associated with improved 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (92.8%, 75.3%, 62.4% vs 70.8%, 46.6%, 32.7%; HR 0.475; 95% CI, 0.459-0.492; p <0.001). Compared with the no adjuvant chemotherapy cohort, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were younger, female, and less comorbid ( p < 0.001). Factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy noncompliance included advancing age, lower annual income, open approach, longer length of stay, pathologic stage IIIA, and fewer than 12 lymph nodes.

LIMITATIONS

Administrative data source with inherent risks of bias, coding errors, and limitations in the fields available for analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival but was only used in 64.3% of older adults with stage III colon cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy noncompliance was seen in the most vulnerable and highest-risk patients, including those with greater comorbidity, lower income, and patients who received open surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C125 .

FACTORES ASOCIADOS CON EL INCUMPLIMIENTO DE LA QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE Y LA SUPERVIVENCIA EN ADULTOS MAYORES CON CNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO III

ANTECEDENTES: El tratamiento estándar de oro del cáncer de colon en estadio III incluye la resección quirúrgica y la quimioterapia adyuvante. A pesar de la mejora de la supervivencia general con la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de colon en estadio III, se reporta que se utiliza poco en los adultos mayores. Hasta la fecha, no existe ningún análisis nacional actual, sobre el uso de quimioterapia adyuvante y su impacto en adultos mayores con cáncer de colon en etapa III.OBJETIVO: Evaluar el uso actual de quimioterapia adyuvante en adultos mayores con cáncer de colon en estadio III y determinar los factores asociados con el incumplimiento.DISEÑO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTES: Realizado y utilizando la Base de Datos Nacional de Cáncer.PACIENTES: Pacientes de 65 años o más sometidos a resección curativa por adenocarcinomas de colon en estadio III de 2010-2017.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Uso de quimioterapia adyuvante, factores asociados con el uso de quimioterapia adyuvante y supervivencia general con y sin quimioterapia adyuvante en adultos mayores con enfermedad en estadio patológico III.RESULTADOS: De 64.608 pacientes incluidos, el 64,3% recibió quimioterapia adyuvante. La quimioterapia adyuvante se asoció de forma significativa e independiente con una mejor supervivencia general a 1, 3 y 5 años frente a ninguna quimioterapia adyuvante (92,8 %, 75,3 %, 62,4 % frente a 70,8 %, 46,6 %, 32,7 %; respectivamente, HR 0,475, 95 % IC 0,459-0,492, p < 0,001). En comparación con la cohorte sin quimioterapia adyuvante, los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante eran más jóvenes, mujeres y con menos comorbilidad. (p < 0,001). Los factores asociados con el incumplimiento de la quimioterapia adyuvante incluyeron edad avanzada (OR 0,857, IC del 95 % 0,854-0,861), ingresos anuales más bajos (OR 0,891, IC del 95 % 0,844-0,940), abordaje abierto (0,730, IC del 95 % 0,633-0,842), mayor duración de la estancia (OR 0,949, IC 95% 0,949-0,954) y estadio patológico IIIA (0,547, IC 95% 0,458-0,652) y <12.LIMITACIONES: Fuente de datos administrativos con riesgos inherentes de sesgo, errores de codificación y limitaciones en los campos disponibles para el análisis.CONCLUSIONES: La quimioterapia adyuvante mejoró significativamente la supervivencia general, pero solo se utilizó en el 64,3 % de los adultos mayores con cáncer de colon en estadio III. El incumplimiento de la quimioterapia adyuvante se observó en los pacientes más vulnerables y de mayor riesgo, incluidos aquellos con mayor comorbilidad, menores ingresos y pacientes que recibieron cirugía abierta. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C125 . (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy ).

Rural–Urban Disparities in Patient Care Experiences among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A SEER-CAHPS Study

Background: We sought to evaluate rural–urban disparities in patient care experiences (PCEs) among localized prostate cancer (PCa) survivors at intermediate-to-high risk of disease progression. Methods: Using 2007–2015 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data linked to Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys, we analyzed survivors’ first survey ≥6 months post-diagnosis. Covariate adjusted linear regressions were used to estimate associations of treatment status (definitive treatment vs. none) and residence (large metro vs. metro vs. rural) with PCE composite and rating measures. Results: Among 3779 PCa survivors, 1798 (53.2%) and 370 (10.9%) resided in large metro and rural areas, respectively; more rural (vs. large metro) residents were untreated (21.9% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.017). Untreated (vs. treated) PCa survivors reported lower scores for doctor communication (ß = −2.0; p = 0.022), specialist rating (ß = −2.5; p = 0.008), and overall care rating (ß = −2.4; p = 0.006). While treated rural survivors gave higher (ß = 3.6; p = 0.022) scores for obtaining needed care, untreated rural survivors gave lower scores for obtaining needed care (ß = −7.0; p = 0.017) and a lower health plan rating (ß = −7.9; p = 0.003) compared to their respective counterparts in large metro areas. Conclusions: Rural PCa survivors are less likely to receive treatment. Rural–urban differences in PCEs varied by treatment status.

Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review

The extent to which individual and structural factors influence cancer patients' reports of their experiences are not yet well understood. We sought to identify which groups of patients consistently report poorer experiences and whether structural care factors might also be associated with better or worse reports. We conducted a systematic review of literature in PubMed and Web of Science with the date of last search as 27th of February 2022 following PRISMA guidelines. We focused on studies from three established population-based surveys datasets and instruments. After screening 303 references, 54 studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, being from an ethnic minority group, having a more deprived socioeconomic status, poorer general or mental health status, being diagnosed with poor prognosis cancers, presenting to care through an emergency route, and having delayed treatment were consistently associated with poorer cancer care experiences. Conversely being diagnosed with earlier stage disease, perceiving communication as effective, positive patient-provider relationships, and receiving treatment with respect were overall associated with better reports of cancer care experiences. Improvement efforts aimed at delivering better experiences of patient-centred care need to take account much more explicitly patients' differing characteristics, prognoses, and trajectories they take through their care journeys.