1
|
Petrillo LA, Jones KF, El-Jawahri A, Sanders J, Greer JA, Temel JS. Why and How to Integrate Early Palliative Care Into Cutting-Edge Personalized Cancer Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e100038. [PMID: 38815187 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_100038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Early palliative care, palliative care integrated with oncology care early in the course of illness, has myriad benefits for patients and their caregivers, including improved quality of life, reduced physical and psychological symptom burden, enhanced prognostic awareness, and reduced health care utilization at the end of life. Although ASCO and others recommend early palliative care for all patients with advanced cancer, widespread implementation of early palliative care has not been realized because of barriers such as insufficient reimbursement and a palliative care workforce shortage. Investigators have recently tested several implementation strategies to overcome these barriers, including triggers for palliative care consultations, telehealth delivery, navigator-delivered interventions, and primary palliative care interventions. More research is needed to identify mechanisms to distribute palliative care optimally and equitably. Simultaneously, the transformation of the oncology treatment landscape has led to shifts in the supportive care needs of patients and caregivers, who may experience longer, uncertain trajectories of cancer. Now, palliative care also plays a clear role in the care of patients with hematologic malignancies and may be beneficial for patients undergoing phase I clinical trials and their caregivers. Further research and clinical guidance regarding how to balance the risks and benefits of opioid therapy and safely manage cancer-related pain across this wide range of settings are urgently needed. The strengths of early palliative care in supporting patients' and caregivers' coping and centering decisions on their goals and values remain valuable in the care of patients receiving cutting-edge personalized cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Petrillo
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Katie Fitzgerald Jones
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- New England Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Jamaica Plain, MA
| | - Areej El-Jawahri
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Justin Sanders
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CA
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, CA
| | - Joseph A Greer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huemer M, Pansi A, Hofmann G, Terbuch A, Sciri E, Lipp R, Spiegelberg JA, Jahn-Kuch D, Pichler M. Symptom clusters associated with complementary and alternative medicine use by cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294641. [PMID: 38096236 PMCID: PMC10721086 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is a commonly used approach among cancer patients, with a reported prevalence of 14.8 to 73.1% depending on multiple factors. Even though a typical patient-reported reason for using CAM is symptom control, no conclusive evidence could be established for specific symptoms being a predictor for CAM use. Symptom clusters are a novel approach for assessing a multidimensional symptom burden, reflecting the impact of diseases on the patient's quality of life and considering the tendency of symptoms to occur in groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS A single-center cross-sectional study on cancer patients during oncological or palliative care was conducted to identify socio-demographical and clinical characteristics, including symptom clusters of CAM users and non-users. Symptom clusters were defined using latent profile analysis, and multivariable analyses were performed to assess significant factors influencing CAM use. RESULTS Of 171 cancer patients in this study, 63.7% used CAM alongside oncological treatment or palliative care. The most common CAM therapies were biological and physical therapies, including homeopathy (30.3%), supplements (27.4%), herbs (26.6%), massage (24.8%), and acupuncture (22.0%). Four distinct symptom clusters were identified, of which the cluster drowsiness-depression-anxiety was associated with a 3.83-fold increased chance of using CAM compared to low-symptomatic cancer patients. Multivariate analysis did not show any additional significant predictors of socio-demographical factors. CONCLUSION Using the concept of symptom clusters revealed a significant predictor for CAM use, suggesting to be a more conclusive method for assessing symptom burden in cancer patients. In addition, understanding why and how cancer patients turn to CAM can enhance the quality of multidisciplinary communication about its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Huemer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Palliative Care Unit, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Anna Pansi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Palliative Care Unit, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Guenter Hofmann
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Palliative Care Unit, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Angelika Terbuch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Sciri
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Palliative Care Unit, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Rainer Lipp
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jasmin Alija Spiegelberg
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Daniela Jahn-Kuch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Palliative Care Unit, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Warnecke E, Salvador Comino MR, Kocol D, Hosters B, Wiesweg M, Bauer S, Welt A, Heinzelmann A, Müller S, Schuler M, Teufel M, Tewes M. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs) Improve the Assessment of Underrated Physical and Psychological Symptom Burden among Oncological Inpatients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15113029. [PMID: 37296991 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15113029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
For advanced cancer inpatients, the established standard for gathering information about symptom burden involves a daily assessment by nursing staff using validated assessments. In contrast, a systematic assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is required, but it is not yet systematically implemented. We hypothesized that current practice results in underrating the severity of patients' symptom burden. To explore this hypothesis, we have established systematic electronic PROMs (ePROMs) using validated instruments at a major German Comprehensive Cancer Center. In this retrospective, non-interventional study, lasting from September 2021 to February 2022, we analyzed collected data from 230 inpatients. Symptom burden obtained by nursing staff was compared to the data acquired by ePROMs. Differences were detected by performing descriptive analyses, Chi-Square tests, Fisher's exact, Phi-correlation, Wilcoxon tests, and Cohen's r. Our analyses pointed out that pain and anxiety especially were significantly underrated by nursing staff. Nursing staff ranked these symptoms as non-existent, whereas patients stated at least mild symptom burden (pain: meanNRS/epaAC = 0 (no); meanePROM = 1 (mild); p < 0.05; r = 0.46; anxiety: meanepaAC = 0 (no); meanePROM = 1 (mild); p < 0.05; r = 0.48). In conclusion, supplementing routine symptom assessment used daily by nursing staff with the systematic, e-health-enabled acquisition of PROMs may improve the quality of supportive and palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Warnecke
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - Maria Rosa Salvador Comino
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - Dilara Kocol
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, West German Cancer Center, LVR-Klinikum Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | | | - Marcel Wiesweg
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Bauer
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - Anja Welt
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - Anna Heinzelmann
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - Sandy Müller
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, West German Cancer Center, LVR-Klinikum Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - Mitra Tewes
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Greisman JD, Olmsted ZT, Crorkin PJ, Dallimore CA, Zhigin V, Shlifer A, Bedi AD, Kim JK, Nelson P, Sy HL, Patel KV, Ellis JA, Boockvar J, Langer DJ, D'Amico RS. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Cranial Tumor Resection: A Review. World Neurosurg 2022; 163:104-122.e2. [PMID: 35381381 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols describe a standardized method of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care to enhance outcomes and minimize complication risks surrounding elective surgical intervention. A growing body of evidence is being generated as we learn to apply principles of ERAS standardization to neurosurgical patients. First applied in spinal surgery, ERAS protocols have been extended to cranial neuro-oncological procedures. This review synthesizes recent findings to generate evidence-based guidelines to manage neurosurgical oncology patients with standardized systems and assess ability of these systems to coordinate multidisciplinary, patient-centric care efforts. Furthermore, we highlight the potential utility of multimedia, app-based communication platforms to facilitate patient education, autonomy, and team communication within each of the three settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob D Greisman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY.
| | - Zachary T Olmsted
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Patrick J Crorkin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Colin A Dallimore
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Vadim Zhigin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Artur Shlifer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Anupama D Bedi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Jane K Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Priscilla Nelson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Heustein L Sy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Kiran V Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Jason A Ellis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - John Boockvar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - David J Langer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Randy S D'Amico
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stern BZ. Clinical Potential of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Occupational Therapy. Am J Occup Ther 2022; 76:23200. [PMID: 35157753 DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2022.049367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This column advocates the clinical potential of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to advance value for occupational therapy patients and the profession. It positions PROMs in the context of value-based health care, provides an overview of emerging applications of PROMs for individual patient care, and introduces clinical advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Occupational therapy practitioners should leverage the opportunities afforded by regulatory initiatives that include PROMs to meaningfully and equitably amplify the patient's voice in clinical contexts. What This Article Adds: This column highlights why occupational therapy practitioners should consider using patient-reported outcome measures in their everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brocha Z Stern
- Brocha Z. Stern, PhD, OTR, is Postdoctoral Fellow, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; . At the time this column was written, Stern was Postdoctoral Fellow, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaufmann TL, Rocque GB. Pathway to Precision Patient-Reported Outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3770-3772. [PMID: 34597155 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabrielle B Rocque
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL.,Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Systematic Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Cranial Surgery. World Neurosurg 2021; 158:279-289.e1. [PMID: 34740831 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways are increasingly being integrated in neurosurgical patient management. The full extent of ERAS in cranial surgery is not well studied. We performed a systematic review examining ERAS in cranial surgery patients to 1) identify the extent to which ERAS is integrated in cranial neurosurgical procedures and 2) assess effectiveness of ERAS interventions for patients undergoing these procedures. METHODS A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines (CRD42020197187). Studies eligible for inclusion assessed patients undergoing any cranial surgical procedure using an ERAS or ERAS-like pathway, defined by ≥2 ERAS protocol elements per the ERAS Society's RECOvER Checklist and the recommendations of Hagan et al. 2016 (not including patient education, criteria for discharge, or tracking of postdischarge outcomes). RESULTS Nine studies were included in qualitative synthesis, 2 of which were randomized controlled trials. All studies showed a moderate risk of bias. The most common ERAS elements used were screening and/or optimization and formal discharge criteria. The least common ERAS elements used were fasting/carbohydrate loading and antithrombotic prophylaxis. Complication rates were similar in studies comparing ERAS with non-ERAS groups. ERAS interventions were associated with reduced length of stay, with comparable and/or improved patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS ERAS is a safe and potentially favorable perioperative pathway for select patients undergoing cranial surgery. Future studies of ERAS in cranial surgery patients should emphasize postoperative optimizations and patient-reported outcome measures as key features.
Collapse
|