1
|
Jung J, Mukherjee K, Brown M, Sadigh G. Association between financial hardship and psychological burden and the role of social and mental health support: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e38871. [PMID: 38996144 PMCID: PMC11245238 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000038871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
We aimed to assess the association between medical financial hardship and psychological burden and the moderating role of social and mental health support. 2021 United States National Health Interview Survey was used. Financial hardship was defined as having financial worry, material hardship, or cost-related care nonadherence. Psychological burden was measured using perceived general health status, satisfaction with life, and serious psychological distress (SPD). Of 29,370 included adults, 49% experienced financial hardship in the last 12 months. Financial hardship was associated with a higher psychological burden (odds ratio [OR], 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.43-5.47 for SPD). Eleven percent received counseling/therapy from mental health professionals, and 90% had experienced frequent social support. Frequent social support was associated with lower financial hardship (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80) and psychological burden (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.42 for SPD). Previous mental health support was associated with higher financial hardship (OR,1.40; 95% CI, 1.28-1.54) and psychological burden (OR, 9.75; 95% CI, 6.97-13.94 for SPD). Those experiencing financial hardship had lower odds of SPD if they received mental health support in the last 12 months (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.85). Future interventions should also focus on improving social support and mental health for patients as a way of mitigating medical financial hardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinho Jung
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Kumar Mukherjee
- School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Suwanee, GA
| | | | - Gelareh Sadigh
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liang MI, Dholakia JD, Lee GM, Wang L, Kako TD, Blair I, Williams CP, Arend RC, Huh WK, Rocque GB, Pisu M. Dedicated financial hardship screening adds value to routine distress screening among gynecologic cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 183:53-60. [PMID: 38518528 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate existing distress screening to identify patients with financial hardship (FH) compared to dedicated FH screening and assess patient attitudes toward FH screening. METHODS We screened gynecologic cancer patients starting a new line of therapy. Existing screening included: (1) Moderate/severe distress defined as Distress Thermometer score ≥ 4, (2) practical concerns identified from Problem Checklist, and (3) a single question assessing trouble paying for medications. FH screening included: (1) Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool and (2) 10-item Financial Needs Checklist to guide referrals. FH was defined as COST score < 26. We calculated sensitivity (patients with moderate/severe distress + FH over total patients with FH) and specificity (patients with no/mild distress + no FH over total patients with no FH) to assess the extent distress screening could capture FH. Surveys and exit interviews assessed patient perspectives toward screening. RESULTS Of 364 patients screened for distress, average age was 62 years, 25% were Black, 45% were Medicare beneficiaries, 32% had moderate/severe distress, 15% reported ≥1 practical concern, and 0 reported trouble paying for medications. Most (n = 357, 98%) patients also completed FH screening: of them, 24% screened positive for FH, 32% reported ≥1 financial need. Distress screening had 57% sensitivity and 77% specificity for FH. Based on 79 surveys and 43 exit interviews, FH screening was acceptable with feedback to improve the timing and setting of screening. CONCLUSIONS Dedicated FH screening was feasible and acceptable, but sensitivity was low. Importantly, 40% of women with FH would not have been identified with distress screening alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jhalak D Dholakia
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Grace M Lee
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Lingling Wang
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Tavonna D Kako
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Isabella Blair
- School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Courtney P Williams
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rebecca C Arend
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Warner K Huh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Gabrielle B Rocque
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Maria Pisu
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Biddell CB, Spees LP, Trogdon JG, Kent EE, Rosenstein DL, Angove RS, Rogers CD, Wheeler SB. Economic Evaluation of a Nonmedical Financial Assistance Program on Missed Treatment Appointments Among Adults With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:300-311. [PMID: 37897261 PMCID: PMC10824376 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and economic impact of a program providing nonmedical financial assistance on missed treatment appointments among patients receiving cancer treatment at a large, Southeastern public hospital system. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used patient electronic health records, program records, and cancer registry data to examine the impact of the program on rates of missed (or no-show) radiation therapy and infusion chemotherapy/immunotherapy appointments in the 180 days after treatment initiation. We used propensity weighting to estimate the effect of the program, stratified by treatment appointment type (radiation therapy, infusion chemotherapy/immunotherapy). We developed a decision tree-based economic model to conduct a cost-consequence analysis from the health system perspective in a hypothetical cohort over a 6-month time horizon. RESULTS Of 1,347 patients receiving radiation therapy between 2015 and 2019, 53% (n = 715) had ≥1 no-shows and 28% (n = 378) received program assistance. Receipt of any assistance was associated with a 2.1 percentage point (95% CI, 0.6 to 3.5) decrease in the proportion of no-shows, corresponding to a 51% decrease in the overall mean no-show proportion. Under the current funding model, the program is estimated to save the health system $153 in US dollars per missed appointment averted, relative to not providing nonmedical financial assistance. Of the 1,641 patients receiving infusion chemotherapy/immunotherapy, 33% (n = 541) received program assistance, and only 14% (n = 223) had ≥1 no-shows. The financial assistance program did not have a significant effect on no-show proportions among infusion visits. CONCLUSION This study used a novel approach to retrospectively evaluate a nonmedical financial assistance program for patients undergoing active cancer treatment. Findings support investment in programs that address patients' nonmedical financial needs, particularly for those undergoing intensive radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin B. Biddell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Chapel Hill, NC
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Lisa P. Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Chapel Hill, NC
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Justin G. Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Chapel Hill, NC
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Erin E. Kent
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Chapel Hill, NC
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Donald L. Rosenstein
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Psychiatry, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Chapel Hill, NC
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shi JJ, Maldonado JA, Wu CF, Peterson SK, Chen YS, Diao K, Volk RJ, Giordano SH, Shih YCT, Kaiser K, Smith GL. Financial toxicity in cancer patients and subsequent risk of repeat acute care utilization. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1209526. [PMID: 37663351 PMCID: PMC10469858 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1209526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Acute care (AC) visits by cancer patients are costly sources of healthcare resources and can exert a financial burden of oncology care both for individuals with cancer and healthcare systems. We sought to identify whether cancer patients who reported more severe initial financial toxicity (FT) burdens shouldered excess risks for acute care utilization. Methods In 225 adult patients who participated in the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) survey study of individuals receiving ambulatory cancer care between March and September 2019, we measured the baseline FT (a multidimensional score of 0-10 indicating the least to most severe global, material, and coping FT burdens). All AC visits, including emergency department (ED) and unplanned hospital admissions, within 1-year follow-up were identified. The association between the severity of FT and the total number of AC visits was tested using Poisson regression models. Results A total of 18.6% (n = 42) of patients had any AC visit, comprising 64.3% hospital admissions and 35.7% ED visits. Global FT burden was associated with the risk of repeat AC visits within 1-year follow-up (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.29, P < 0.001 for every unit increase), even after adjusting for sociodemographic and disease covariates. When examining subdimensions of FT, the burden of depleted FT coping resources (coping FT) was strongly associated with the risk of repeat AC visits (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.40, P < 0.001) while material FT burden showed a trend toward association (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, P = 0.07). Conclusion In this prospective study of acute oncology care utilization outcomes among adult cancer patients, FT was a predictor of a higher burden of acute care visits. Patients with severely depleted material and also practical and social coping resources were at particular risk for repeated visits. Future studies are needed to identify whether early FT screening and intervention efforts may help to mitigate urgent acute care utilization burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia J. Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - J. Alberto Maldonado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- John Sealy School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Chi-Fang Wu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ying-Shiuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kevin Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Robert J. Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ya-Chen T. Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kelsey Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shi JJ, McGinnis GJ, Peterson SK, Taku N, Chen YS, Yu RK, Wu CF, Mendoza TR, Shete SS, Ma H, Volk RJ, Giordano SH, Shih YCT, Nguyen DK, Kaiser KW, Smith GL. Pilot study of a Spanish language measure of financial toxicity in underserved Hispanic cancer patients with low English proficiency. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1188783. [PMID: 37492449 PMCID: PMC10364629 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1188783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Financial toxicity (FT) reflects multi-dimensional personal economic hardships borne by cancer patients. It is unknown whether measures of FT-to date derived largely from English-speakers-adequately capture economic experiences and financial hardships of medically underserved low English proficiency US Hispanic cancer patients. We piloted a Spanish language FT instrument in this population. Methods We piloted a Spanish version of the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) FT measure using qualitative cognitive interviews and surveys in un-/under-insured or medically underserved, low English proficiency, Spanish-speaking Hispanics (UN-Spanish, n = 23) receiving ambulatory oncology care at a public healthcare safety net hospital in the Houston metropolitan area. Exploratory analyses compared ENRICh FT scores amongst the UN-Spanish group to: (1) un-/under-insured English-speaking Hispanics (UN-English, n = 23) from the same public facility and (2) insured English-speaking Hispanics (INS-English, n = 31) from an academic comprehensive cancer center. Multivariable logistic models compared the outcome of severe FT (score > 6). Results UN-Spanish Hispanic participants reported high acceptability of the instrument (only 0% responded that the instrument was "very difficult to answer" and 4% that it was "very difficult to understand the questions"; 8% responded that it was "very difficult to remember resources used" and 8% that it was "very difficult to remember the burdens experienced"; and 4% responded that it was "very uncomfortable to respond"). Internal consistency of the FT measure was high (Cronbach's α = 0.906). In qualitative responses, UN-Spanish Hispanics frequently identified a total lack of credit, savings, or income and food insecurity as aspects contributing to FT. UN-Spanish and UN-English Hispanic patients were younger, had lower education and income, resided in socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods and had more advanced cancer vs. INS-English Hispanics. There was a higher likelihood of severe FT in UN-Spanish (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 0.77-9.70; p = 0.12) and UN-English (OR = 4.13, 95% CI 1.13-15.12; p = 0.03) vs. INS-English Hispanics. A higher likelihood of severely depleted FT coping resources occurred in UN-Spanish (OR = 4.00, 95% CI 1.07-14.92; p = 0.04) and UN-English (OR = 5.73, 95% CI 1.49-22.1; p = 0.01) vs. INS-English. The likelihood of FT did not differ between UN-Spanish and UN-English in both models (p = 0.59 and p = 0.62 respectively). Conclusion In medically underserved, uninsured Hispanic patients with cancer, comprehensive Spanish-language FT assessment in low English proficiency participants was feasible, acceptable, and internally consistent. Future studies employing tailored FT assessment and intervention should encompass the key privations and hardships in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia J. Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gwendolyn J. McGinnis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nicolette Taku
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ying-Shiuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Robert K. Yu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Chi-Fang Wu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Tito R. Mendoza
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sanjay S. Shete
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Hilary Ma
- Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Robert J. Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ya-Chen T. Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Diem-Khanh Nguyen
- University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, United States
| | - Kelsey W. Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Biddell CB, Waters AR, Angove RSM, Gallagher KD, Rosenstein DL, Spees LP, Kent EE, Planey AM, Wheeler SB. Facing financial barriers to healthcare: patient-informed adaptation of a conceptual framework for adults with a history of cancer. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1178517. [PMID: 37255517 PMCID: PMC10225523 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer-related financial hardship is associated with negative clinical outcomes, which may be partially explained by cost-related delayed or forgone care in response to financial barriers. We sought to understand patient experiences facing financial barriers to medical care following a cancer diagnosis. Methods We conducted virtual, semi-structured interviews in Fall 2022 with 20 adults with a history of cancer who had experienced cancer-related financial hardship in the prior year. We used template analysis within a pragmatic paradigm, combining constructivist and critical realist theoretical perspectives, to analyze interview transcripts and adapt an existing conceptual framework of financial barriers to care. Results The majority of interviewees identified as women (70%), non-Hispanic white (60%), and reported an annual household income of <$48,000 (60%). As interviewees sought to overcome financial barriers, they described substantial frustration at the limitations and complexities of United States health and social care systems, resulting in a reliance on a fragmented, uncertain resource landscape. The administrative burden resulting from bureaucratic systems and the advocacy responsibilities required to navigate them ultimately fell on interviewees and their caregivers. Thus, participants described their ability to overcome financial barriers as being influenced by individual and interpersonal factors, such as social support, comfort asking for help, time, prior experience navigating resources, and physical and mental health. However, participants noted health system organizational factors, such as whether all new patients proactively met with a social worker or financial navigator, as having the potential to lessen the administrative and financial burden experienced. Conclusion We present an adapted conceptual framework outlining multi-level factors influencing patient experiences coping with financial barriers to medical care. In addition to influencing whether a patient ultimately delays or forgoes care due to cost, financial barriers also have the potential to independently affect patient mental, physical, and financial health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin B. Biddell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Austin R. Waters
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Rebekah S. M. Angove
- Patient Insight Institute, Patient Advocate Foundation, Hampton, VA, United States
| | | | - Donald L. Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Lisa P. Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Erin E. Kent
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Arrianna Marie Planey
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shi JJ, Lei X, Chen YS, Chavez-MacGregor M, Bloom E, Schlembach P, Shaitelman SF, Buchholz TA, Kaiser K, Ku K, Smith BD, Smith GL. Socioeconomic Barriers to Randomized Clinical Trial Retention in Patients Treated With Adjuvant Radiation for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:122-131. [PMID: 36724858 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Socioeconomic barriers contribute to breast cancer clinical trial enrollment disparities. We sought to identify whether socioeconomic disadvantage also is associated with decreased trial retention. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a secondary analysis of 253 (of 287) patients enrolled in a randomized phase 3 trial of conventionally fractionated versus hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation. The outcome of trial retention versus dropout was defined primarily based on whether the patient completed breast cosmesis outcomes assessment at 3-year follow-up, and secondarily, at 5-year follow-up. Associations of retention with severity of socioeconomic disadvantage, quantified by patients' home neighborhood area deprivation index (ADI) rank (1 [least] to 100 [most deprivation]), were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test and multivariate logistic regression. Associations of retention with patients' use of social resource assistance were analyzed using the χ2 test. RESULTS In total, 21.7% (n = 55) of patients dropped out by 3 years and 36.7% (n = 92) by 5 years. Median ADI was 36.5 (interquartile range, 22-57) for retained and 46.0 (interquartile range, 29-60) for dropout patients. Dropout was associated with more severe socioeconomic deprivation (ADI ≥45 vs <45) at 3 years (odds ratio, 3.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.62-8.15; P = .002) and 5 years (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-4.76; P = .003). While on study, patients who ultimately dropped out were more likely to require resource assistance for practical (transportation, housing, financial) than psychological needs (distress, grief) or advance care planning (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS In this study, ADI was associated with disparities in clinical trial retention of patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiation treatment. Results suggest that developing multidimensional interventions that extend beyond routine social determinants needs screening are needed, not only to enhance initial clinical trial access and enrollment but also to enable robust long-term retention of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients and improve the validity and generalizability of reported long-term trial clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia J Shi
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiudong Lei
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Elizabeth Bloom
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Kelsey Kaiser
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kimberly Ku
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Grace L Smith
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Smith GL, Banegas MP, Acquati C, Chang S, Chino F, Conti RM, Greenup RA, Kroll JL, Liang MI, Pisu M, Primm KM, Roth ME, Shankaran V, Yabroff KR. Navigating financial toxicity in patients with cancer: A multidisciplinary management approach. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:437-453. [PMID: 35584404 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately one-half of individuals with cancer face personal economic burdens associated with the disease and its treatment, a problem known as financial toxicity (FT). FT more frequently affects socioeconomically vulnerable individuals and leads to subsequent adverse economic and health outcomes. Whereas multilevel systemic factors at the policy, payer, and provider levels drive FT, there are also accompanying intervenable patient-level factors that exacerbate FT in the setting of clinical care delivery. The primary strategy to intervene on FT at the patient level is financial navigation. Financial navigation uses comprehensive assessment of patients' risk factors for FT, guidance toward support resources, and referrals to assist patient financial needs during cancer care. Social workers or nurse navigators most frequently lead financial navigation. Oncologists and clinical provider teams are multidisciplinary partners who can support optimal FT management in the context of their clinical roles. Oncologists and clinical provider teams can proactively assess patient concerns about the financial hardship and employment effects of disease and treatment. They can respond by streamlining clinical treatment and care delivery planning and incorporating FT concerns into comprehensive goals of care discussions and coordinated symptom and psychosocial care. By understanding how age and life stage, socioeconomic, and cultural factors modify FT trajectory, oncologists and multidisciplinary health care teams can be engaged and informative in patient-centered, tailored FT management. The case presentations in this report provide a practical context to summarize authors' recommendations for patient-level FT management, supported by a review of key supporting evidence and a discussion of challenges to mitigating FT in oncology care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:437-453.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew P Banegas
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Chiara Acquati
- Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shine Chang
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rena M Conti
- Department of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Boston University School of Business, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel A Greenup
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Juliet L Kroll
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Maria Pisu
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kristin M Primm
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael E Roth
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Veena Shankaran
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Corrigan KL, Fu S, Chen YS, Kaiser K, Roth M, Peterson SK, Shih YCT, Jagsi R, Giordano SH, Volk RJ, Robin Yabroff K, Banegas MP, Acquati C, Conti RM, Ma HY, Ku K, Nancy You Y, Smith GL. Financial toxicity impact on younger versus older adults with cancer in the setting of care delivery. Cancer 2022; 128:2455-2462. [PMID: 35417565 PMCID: PMC9177670 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adults and other working-age adults with cancer are at risk for cancer-related financial toxicity (FT), including material hardships, depletion of coping resources, and psychological burden. This study compares FT domains in young adults (18-39 years old) (YAs), other working-age adults (40-64 years old), and older adults (≥65 years old) receiving cancer care. METHODS A total of 311 adults were surveyed using the multi-domain Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer instrument measuring FT (0-10 score indicating least to greatest FT; score ≥5 severe FT). Participants were receiving ambulatory care from March-September 2019. Associations of age with overall FT and material hardship, coping resource depletion, and psychological burden FT domains were tested using Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests and multivariable generalized linear models with gamma distribution. RESULTS YAs (median age, 31.5 years) comprised 9.6% of the sample; other working-age adults comprised 56.9%. Overall, material, coping, and psychological FT scores were worse in younger age adults versus older adults (P < .001 in all multivariable models). Compared with older adults, younger age adults demonstrated worse material hardship (median scores, 3.70 vs 4.80 vs 1.30 for YAs, other working-age, and older adults, respectively; P < .001), coping resource depletion (4.50 vs 3.40 vs 0.80; P < .001), and psychological burden (6.50 vs 7.00 vs 1.00; P < .001). Fifty percent of YAs had severe overall FT versus 40.7% of other working-age adults and 9.6% of older adults (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Younger age adults with cancer bore disproportionate FT. Interventions to address unmet needs are critical components for addressing FT in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey L. Corrigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shuangshuang Fu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ying-Shiuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kelsey Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Roth
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ya-Chen T. Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert J. Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Mathew P. Banegas
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Chiara Acquati
- Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, TX
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rena M. Conti
- Department of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Boston University School of Business, Boston, MA
| | - Hilary Y. Ma
- Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kimberly Ku
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y. Nancy You
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beauchemin M, Santacroce SJ, Bona K, Dang H, Alexander S, Allen K, De Los Santos C, Fisher B, Muñeton-Castaño Y, Ponce O, Vargas S, Sugalski A, Sung L, Parsons S. Rationale and design of Children's Oncology Group (COG) study ACCL20N1CD: financial distress during treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:832. [PMID: 35764995 PMCID: PMC9237978 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08201-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study purpose is to describe trajectories of financial distress for parents of children (ages 1-14.9 years) with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The secondary aim is to identify multilevel factors (child, parent, household, treating institution) that influence change in financial distress over time. METHODS The study uses a prospective cohort design, repeated measurements, and mixed methods. The settings are Children's Oncology Group (COG) institutions participating in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). Eligible participants are English- and/or Spanish-speaking parents or legal guardians (hereafter "parents") of index children. Parents are asked to complete a survey during their child's induction (T1) and maintenance therapy (T2), and near treatment completion (T3). Study surveys include items about (a) the child's cancer and clinical course, (b) parental socio-economic status, financial distress and financial coping behaviors, and (c) household material hardships. At least 15 parents will be invited to participate in an optional semi-structured interview. NCORP institutions that enroll at least one parent must complete an annual survey about institution resources that could influence parental financial distress. DISCUSSION The results will inform future interventions to mitigate financial distress for parents of children diagnosed with ALL and could be instructive beyond this disease group. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was initially registered with the NCI Clinical Trial Reporting Program ID: NCI-2021-03,567 on June 16, 2021. The study can be found on clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier NCT04928599 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Beauchemin
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY USA ,grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Sheila Judge Santacroce
- grid.10698.360000000122483208School of Nursing, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA ,grid.410711.20000 0001 1034 1720Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Kira Bona
- grid.2515.30000 0004 0378 8438Department of Pediatric Oncology, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MB USA
| | - Ha Dang
- grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | | | - Kamala Allen
- grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Crystal De Los Santos
- grid.414149.d0000 0004 0383 4967Driscoll Children’s Hospital, Corpus Christi, TX USA
| | - Beth Fisher
- grid.428158.20000 0004 0371 6071Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | - Olivia Ponce
- grid.428204.80000 0000 8741 3510Children’s Oncology Group, Monrovia, CA USA
| | - Sarah Vargas
- grid.428204.80000 0000 8741 3510Children’s Oncology Group, Monrovia, CA USA
| | - Aaron Sugalski
- grid.267309.90000 0001 0629 5880University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
| | | | - Susan Parsons
- grid.67033.310000 0000 8934 4045Tufts Medical Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wheeler SB, Birken SA, Wagi CR, Manning ML, Gellin M, Padilla N, Rogers C, Rodriguez J, Biddell CB, Strom C, Bell RA, Rosenstein DL. Core functions of a financial navigation intervention: An in-depth assessment of the Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) intervention to inform adaptation and scale-up in diverse oncology care settings. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:958831. [PMID: 36925862 PMCID: PMC10012722 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.958831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) is an intervention designed to address financial toxicity (FT) and improve cancer care access and outcomes through financial navigation (FN). FN identifies patients at risk for FT, assesses eligibility for financial support, and develops strategies to cope with those costs. LIFT successfully reduced FT and improved care access in a preliminary study among patients with high levels of FT in a single large academic cancer center. Adapting LIFT requires distinguishing between core functions (components that are key to its implementation and effectiveness) and forms (specific activities that carry out core functions). Our objective was to complete the first stage of adaptation, identifying LIFT core functions. Methods We reviewed LIFT's protocol and internal standard-operating procedures. We then conducted 45-90 min in-depth interviews, using Kirk's method of identifying core functions, with key LIFT staff (N = 8), including the principal investigators. Interviews focused on participant roles and intervention implementation. Recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Using ATLAS.ti and a codebook based on the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact, we coded interview transcripts. Through thematic analysis, we then identified themes related to LIFT's intervention and implementation core functions. Two report back sessions with interview participants were incorporated to further refine themes. Results Six intervention core functions (i.e., what makes LIFT effective) and five implementation core functions (i.e., what facilitated LIFT's implementation) were identified to be sufficient to reduce FT. Intervention core functions included systematically cataloging knowledge and tracking patient-specific information related to eligibility criteria for FT relief. Repeat contacts between the financial navigator and participant created an ongoing relationship, removing common barriers to accessing resources. Implementation core functions included having engaged sites with the resources and willingness necessary to implement FN. Developing navigators' capabilities to implement LIFT-through training, an established case management system, and connections to peer navigators-were also identified as implementation core functions. Conclusion This study adds to the growing evidence on FN by characterizing intervention and implementation core functions, a critical step toward promoting LIFT's implementation and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Sarah A Birken
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.,Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Cheyenne R Wagi
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Michelle L Manning
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Mindy Gellin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Neda Padilla
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Cindy Rogers
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Julia Rodriguez
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Caitlin B Biddell
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Carla Strom
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Ronny Antonio Bell
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Donald L Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|