1
|
Lesueur F, Easton DF, Renault AL, Tavtigian SV, Bernstein JL, Kote-Jarai Z, Eeles RA, Plaseska-Karanfia D, Feliubadaló L, Arun B, Herold N, Versmold B, Schmutzler RK, Nguyen-Dumont T, Southey MC, Dorling L, Dunning AM, Ghiorzo P, Dalmasso BS, Cavaciuti E, Le Gal D, Roberts NJ, Dominguez-Valentin M, Rookus M, Taylor AMR, Goldstein AM, Goldgar DE, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Andrieu N. First international workshop of the ATM and cancer risk group (4-5 December 2019). Fam Cancer 2022; 21:211-227. [PMID: 34125377 PMCID: PMC9969796 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00248-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The first International Workshop of the ATM and Cancer Risk group focusing on the role of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) gene in cancer was held on December 4 and 5, 2019 at Institut Curie in Paris, France. It was motivated by the fact that germline ATM pathogenic variants have been found to be associated with different cancer types. However, due to the lack of precise age-, sex-, and site-specific risk estimates, no consensus on management guidelines for variant carriers exists, and the clinical utility of ATM variant testing is uncertain. The meeting brought together epidemiologists, geneticists, biologists and clinicians to review current knowledge and on-going challenges related to ATM and cancer risk. This report summarizes the meeting sessions content that covered the latest results in family-based and population-based studies, the importance of accurate variant classification, the effect of radiation exposures for ATM variant carriers, and the characteristics of ATM-deficient tumors. The report concludes that ATM variant carriers outside of the context of Ataxia-Telangiectasia may benefit from effective cancer risk management and therapeutic strategies and that efforts to set up large-scale studies in the international framework to achieve this goal are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne Lesueur
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Team, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne-Laure Renault
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Dijana Plaseska-Karanfia
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology « Georgi D. Efremov », MASA, Skopje, UK
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Oncobell Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Banu Arun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Natalie Herold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Beatrix Versmold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tú Nguyen-Dumont
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Leila Dorling
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paola Ghiorzo
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Bruna Samia Dalmasso
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Eve Cavaciuti
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Team, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Dorothée Le Gal
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Team, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Mev Dominguez-Valentin
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Matti Rookus
- Netherlands Cancer Institute NKI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander M R Taylor
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alisa M Goldstein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | | | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- INSERM U830, Paris, France
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Team, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
- Institut Curie, Paris, France.
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France.
- PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A catalog of curated breast cancer genes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 191:431-441. [PMID: 34755241 PMCID: PMC8763822 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06441-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Decades of research have identified multiple genetic variants associated with breast cancer etiology. However, there is no database that archives breast cancer genes and variants responsible for predisposition. We set out to build a dynamic repository of curated breast cancer genes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar, followed by data extraction and harmonization for downstream analysis. Results Using a subset of 345 studies, we cataloged 652 breast cancer-associated loci across the genome. A majority of these were present in the non-coding region (i.e., intergenic (101) and intronic (345)), whereas only 158 were located within an exon. Using the odds ratio, we identified 429 loci to increase the disease risk and 198 to confer protection against breast cancer, whereas 25 were identified to both increase disease risk and confer protection against breast cancer. Chromosomal ideogram analysis indicated that chromosomes 17 and 19 have the highest density of breast cancer loci. We manually annotated and collated breast cancer genes in which a previous association between rare-monogenic variant and breast cancer has been documented. Finally, network and functional enrichment analysis revealed that steroid metabolism and DNA repair pathways were predominant among breast cancer genes and variants. Conclusions We have built an online interactive catalog of curated breast cancer genes (https://cbcg.dk). This will expedite clinical diagnostics and support the ongoing efforts in managing breast cancer etiology. Moreover, the database will serve as an essential repository when designing new breast cancer multigene panels. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06441-y.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cacioppo CN, Egleston BL, Fetzer D, Burke Sands C, Raza SA, Reddy Malleda N, McCarty Wood E, Rittenburg I, Childs J, Cho D, Hosford M, Khair T, Khatri J, Komarnicky L, Poretta T, Rahman F, Shah S, Patrick-Miller LJ, Domchek SM, Bradbury AR. Randomized study of remote telehealth genetic services versus usual care in oncology practices without genetic counselors. Cancer Med 2021; 10:4532-4541. [PMID: 34102012 PMCID: PMC8267134 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine the benefit of telehealth over current delivery options in oncology practices without genetic counselors. Methods Participants meeting cancer genetic testing guidelines were recruited to this multi‐center, randomized trial comparing uptake of genetic services with remote services (telephone or videoconference) to usual care in six predominantly community practices without genetic counselors. The primary outcome was the composite uptake of genetic counseling or testing. Secondary outcomes compare telephone versus videoconference services. Results 147 participants enrolled and 119 were randomized. Eighty percent of participants in the telehealth arm had genetic services as compared to 16% in the usual care arm (OR 30.52, p < 0.001). Five genetic mutation carriers (6.7%) were identified in the telehealth arm, compared to none in the usual care arm. In secondary analyses, factors associated with uptake were lower anxiety (6.77 vs. 8.07, p = 0.04) and lower depression (3.38 vs. 5.06, p = 0.04) among those who had genetic services. There were no significant differences in change in cognitive or affective outcomes immediately post‐counseling and at 6 and 12 months between telephone and videoconference arms. Conclusion Telehealth increases uptake of genetic counseling and testing at oncology practices without genetic counselors and could significantly improve identification of genetic carriers and cancer prevention outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara N Cacioppo
- Penn Telegenetics Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brian L Egleston
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dominique Fetzer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Colleen Burke Sands
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Syeda A Raza
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - India Rittenburg
- Penn Telegenetics Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - David Cho
- Cape Regional Medical Center, Cape May Court House, NJ, USA
| | | | - Tina Khair
- Gettysburg Cancer Center, Gettysburg, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Satish Shah
- Gettysburg Cancer Center, Gettysburg, PA, USA
| | - Linda J Patrick-Miller
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Angela R Bradbury
- Penn Telegenetics Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reyes KG, Clark C, Gerhart M, Newson AJ, Ormond KE. "I wish that there was more info": characterizing the uncertainty experienced by carriers of pathogenic ATM and/or CHEK2 variants. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:143-155. [PMID: 33855648 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00251-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about what uncertainties patients experience after being identified to carry a pathogenic variant in a moderate-risk cancer gene as a result of undergoing multigene panel testing for cancer susceptibility. Data regarding cancer risk estimates and effectiveness of risk management strategies for these variants continues to evolve, which has the potential to evoke uncertainty. Acknowledging uncertainty during pre- and post-test discussions is imperative to helping individuals to adapt to their results. A better understanding of this population's experience of uncertainty is needed to facilitate such discussions and is the aim of the current study. Semi-structured interviews (30-60 min in length), informed by Han and colleagues' taxonomy of uncertainty in clinical genomic sequencing, were conducted to assess motivations to pursue genetic testing, areas of perceived uncertainty, and strategies for managing uncertainty among 20 carriers of pathogenic variants in two moderate-risk genes, ATM and CHEK2. We found that participants pursue genetic testing with the expectation that results will clarify cancer risks and approaches to management. Participants experience uncertainties aligning with Han's taxonomy relating to the ambiguity of specific cancer risk estimates and effectiveness of certain risk management strategies. These uncertainties influenced decisions around the uptake of risk management strategies, which were additionally impacted by clinicians' uncertainty towards such strategies. Participants employ a variety of uncertainty management approaches to cope with their anxieties. Clinicians may wish to use these findings to facilitate patient adaptation to the implications of multigene panel testing for cancer susceptibility during both pre- and post-test counseling sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn G Reyes
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cheyla Clark
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Meredith Gerhart
- Cancer Genetics and Genomics, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. .,Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pozzar RA, Hong F, Xiong N, Stopfer JE, Nayak MM, Underhill-Blazey M. Knowledge and psychosocial impact of genetic counseling and multigene panel testing among individuals with ovarian cancer. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:35-47. [PMID: 33751319 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00240-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In a sample of individuals with ovarian cancer, we aimed to (a) identify factors associated with the psychosocial impact of genetic counseling and multigene panel testing, (b) identify factors associated with cancer genetics knowledge, and (c) summarize patient-reported recommendations to improve the genetic counseling and multigene panel testing process. Eligible participants in this secondary analysis of quantitative and qualitative survey data were English-speaking adults with ovarian cancer. Psychosocial impact was assessed using the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire. Knowledge of cancer genetics was assessed using the KnowGene scale. Significant predictors of MICRA and KnowGene scores were identified using multiple regression. Open-ended survey item responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Eighty-seven participants met eligibility criteria. A positive genetic test result was associated with greater adverse psychosocial impact (B = 1.13, p = 0.002). Older age (B = - 0.07, p = 0.044) and being a member of a minority racial or ethnic group (B = - 3.075, p = 0.033) were associated with lower knowledge, while a personal history of at least one other type of cancer (B = 1.975, p = 0.015) was associated with higher knowledge. In open-ended item responses, participants wanted clinicians to assist with family communication, improve result disclosure, and enhance patient and family understanding of results. A subset of individuals with ovarian cancer who receive a positive genetic test result may be at risk for adverse psychosocial outcomes. Tailored cancer genetics education is necessary to promote the equitable uptake of targeted ovarian cancer treatment and risk-reducing therapies. Interventions to enhance patient-clinician communication in this setting are a research priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Pozzar
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Niya Xiong
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jill E Stopfer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Manan M Nayak
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Meghan Underhill-Blazey
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ginsburg O, Ashton-Prolla P, Cantor A, Mariosa D, Brennan P. The role of genomics in global cancer prevention. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18:116-128. [PMID: 32973296 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0428-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite improvements in the understanding of cancer causation, much remains unknown regarding the mechanisms by which genomic and non-genomic factors initiate carcinogenesis, drive cell invasion and metastasis, and enable cancer to develop. Technological advances have enabled the analysis of whole genomes, comprising thousands of tumours across populations worldwide, with the aim of identifying mutation signatures associated with particular tumour types. Large collaborative efforts have resulted in the identification and improved understanding of causal factors, and have shed light on new opportunities to prevent cancer. In this new era in cancer genomics, discoveries from studies conducted on an international scale can inform evidence-based strategies in cancer control along the cancer care continuum, from prevention to treatment. In this Review, we present the relevant history and emerging frontiers of cancer genetics and genomics from the perspective of global cancer prevention. We highlight the importance of local context in the adoption of new technologies and emergent evidence, with illustrative examples from worldwide. We emphasize the challenges in implementing important genomic findings in clinical settings with disparate resource availability and present a conceptual framework for the translation of such findings into clinical practice, and evidence-based policies in order to maximize the utility for a population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
- Section for Global Health, Division of Health and Behavior, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Patricia Ashton-Prolla
- Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre and Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Anna Cantor
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paul Brennan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|