1
|
Kleiblová P, Černá M, Zemánková P, Matějková K, Nehasil P, Hojný J, Horáčková K, Janatová M, Soukupová J, Šťastná B, Kleibl Z. Parallel DNA/RNA NGS Using an Identical Target Enrichment Panel in the Analysis of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition. Folia Biol (Praha) 2024; 70:62-73. [PMID: 38830124 DOI: 10.14712/fb2024070010062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Germline DNA testing using the next-gene-ration sequencing (NGS) technology has become the analytical standard for the diagnostics of hereditary diseases, including cancer. Its increasing use places high demands on correct sample identification, independent confirmation of prioritized variants, and their functional and clinical interpretation. To streamline these processes, we introduced parallel DNA and RNA capture-based NGS using identical capture panel CZECANCA, which is routinely used for DNA analysis of hereditary cancer predisposition. Here, we present the analytical workflow for RNA sample processing and its analytical and diagnostic performance. Parallel DNA/RNA analysis allowed credible sample identification by calculating the kinship coefficient. The RNA capture-based approach enriched transcriptional targets for the majority of clinically relevant cancer predisposition genes to a degree that allowed analysis of the effect of identified DNA variants on mRNA processing. By comparing the panel and whole-exome RNA enrichment, we demonstrated that the tissue-specific gene expression pattern is independent of the capture panel. Moreover, technical replicates confirmed high reproducibility of the tested RNA analysis. We concluded that parallel DNA/RNA NGS using the identical gene panel is a robust and cost-effective diagnostic strategy. In our setting, it allows routine analysis of 48 DNA/RNA pairs using NextSeq 500/550 Mid Output Kit v2.5 (150 cycles) in a single run with sufficient coverage to analyse 226 cancer predisposition and candidate ge-nes. This approach can replace laborious Sanger confirmatory sequencing, increase testing turnaround, reduce analysis costs, and improve interpretation of the impact of variants by analysing their effect on mRNA processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Kleiblová
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Marta Černá
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petra Zemánková
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kateřina Matějková
- Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Nehasil
- Department of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Hojný
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Klára Horáčková
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Markéta Janatová
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Soukupová
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Barbora Šťastná
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zdeněk Kleibl
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giles HH, Hegde MR, Lyon E, Stanley CM, Kerr ID, Garlapow ME, Eggington JM. The Science and Art of Clinical Genetic Variant Classification and Its Impact on Test Accuracy. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2021; 22:285-307. [PMID: 33900788 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-121620-082709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Clinical genetic variant classification science is a growing subspecialty of clinical genetics and genomics. The field's continued improvement is essential for the success of precision medicine in both germline (hereditary) and somatic (oncology) contexts. This review focuses on variant classification for DNA next-generation sequencing tests. We first summarize current limitations in variant discovery and definition, and then describe the current five- and four-tier classification systems outlined in dominant standards and guideline publications for germline and somatic tests, respectively. We then discuss measures of variant classification discordance and the field's bias for positive results, as well as considerations for panel size and population screening in the context of estimates of positive predictive value thatincorporate estimated variant classification imperfections. Finally, we share opinions on the current state of variant classification from some of the authors of the most widely used standards and guideline publications and from other domain experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter H Giles
- Center for Genomic Interpretation, Sandy, Utah 84092, USA; , ,
| | - Madhuri R Hegde
- PerkinElmer Genomics, Waltham, Massachusetts 02450, USA; .,Department of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
| | - Elaine Lyon
- HudsonAlpha Clinical Services Lab, Huntsville, Alabama 35806, USA;
| | - Christine M Stanley
- C2i Genomics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.,Variantyx, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA;
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|