MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Overview of Biology, Clinical Outcomes, and Testing Considerations

Liquid-based cytology specimens for next-generation sequencing in lung adenocarcinoma: challenges and evaluation of targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

To explore challenges of liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens for next-generation sequencing (NGS) in lung adenocarcinoma and evaluate the efficacy of targeted therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the NGS test of 357 cases of advanced lung adenocarcinoma LBC specimens and compared with results of histological specimens to assess the consistency. The impact of tumor cellularity on NGS test results was evaluated. The utility of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) was collected. Clinical efficacy evaluation was performed and survival curve analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

There were 275 TKI-naive and 82 TKI-treated specimens, the mutation rates of cancer-related genes detected in both groups were similar (86.2% vs. 86.6%). The EGFR mutation rate in the TKI treated group was higher than that in the TKI-naive group (69.5% > 54.9%, P = 0.019). There was no significant difference in the EGFR mutation frequency among different tumor cellularity in the TKI-naive group. However, in the TKI treated group, the frequency of EGFR sensitizing mutation and T790M resistance mutation in specimens with < 20% tumor cellularity was significantly lower than that in specimens with ≥ 20% tumor cellularity. Among 22 cases with matched histological specimens, 72.7% (16/22) of LBC specimens were completely consistent with results of histological specimens. Among 92 patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma treated with EGFR-TKIs in the two cohorts, 88 cases experienced progression, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytological specimens are important sources for gene detection of advanced lung adenocarcinoma. When using LBC specimens for molecular testing, it is recommended to fully evaluate the tumor cellularity of the specimens.

Uncommon MET mutational landscape in a non-small cell lung cancer patient treated with crizotinib: Case report

Background

MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations are oncogenic drivers observed in approximately 3-4% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Several distinct genetic alterations leading to METex14 have been reported but clinical significances of rare mutations are not well defined as well as outcomes of patients upon MET inhibitors (METi).

Case presentation

This report presents the case of a patient with metastatic NSCLC harboring an uncommon MET mutational landscape including notably a novel METex14 mutation (R1022L). Dramatic but transient efficacy was observed under crizotinib, due to early occurrence of acquired both on- and off-target mechanisms of resistance such as MET D1246H mutation and wild-type KRAS amplification.

Conclusion

Our case provides additional data on MET rare oncogenic variants and their sensitivity to METi. Systematic assessment of post-tyrosine kinase inhibitor tumor sample remains critical to identify on- and off-target mechanisms that may represent therapeutically targetable drivers in resistant patients.

Precision nanomedicine to treat non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a major cause of death worldwide, being often detected at a later stage due to the non-appearance of early symptoms. Therefore, specificity of the treatment is of utmost importance for its effective treatment. Precision medicine is a personalized therapy based on the genomics of the patient to design a suitable drug approach. Genetic mutations render the tumor resistant to specific mutations and the therapy is in vain even though correct medications are prescribed. Therefore, Precision medicine needs to be explored for the treatment of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nanoparticles are widely explored to give personalized interventions to treat lung cancer due to their various advantages like the ability to reach cancer cells, enhanced permeation through tissues, specificity, increased bioavailability, etc. Various nanoparticles (NPs) including gold nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, aptamer-based NPs etc. were conjugated with biomarkers/diagnostic agents specific to cancer type and were delivered. Various biomarker genes have been identified through precision techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC like EGFR, RET, KRAS, ALK, ROS-1, NTRK-1, etc. By incorporating of drug with the nanoparticle through bioconjugation, the specificity of the treatment can be enhanced with this revolutionary treatment. Additionally, integration of theranostic cargos in the nanoparticle would allow diagnosis as well as treatment by targeting the site of disease progression. Therefore, to target NSCLC effectively precision nanomedicine has been adopted in recent times. Here, we present different nanoparticles that are used as precision nanomedicine and their effectiveness against NSCLC disease.

Comparison of diagnostic performance between Oncomine Dx target test and AmoyDx panel for detecting actionable mutations in lung cancer

Companion diagnostic (CDx) tests play important roles in identifying oncogenic driver genes and tailoring effective molecularly targeted therapies for lung cancer patients. In Japan, the Oncomine Dx target test (ODxTT) and the AmoyDx pan lung cancer PCR panel (AmoyDx) are prominent CDx tests and only one of these tests is covered by the domestic insurance system. However, these CDx tests cover different target regions and apply different technologies (ODxTT is amplicon-based next-generation sequencing and AmoyDx is multiplex PCR-based assay), which may lead to missing of actionable mutations affecting patient prognosis. Here, we performed a direct comparison analysis of 1059 genetic alterations of eight driver genes from 131 samples and evaluated the concordance between two CDx tests for detecting actionable variants and fusions. When excluding the eight uncovered variants (ODxTT: two variants, AmoyDx: six variants), the overall percent agreement was 97.6% (1026/1051) with 89.0% of overall positive percent agreement (89/100) and 98.5% of overall negative percent agreement (937/951). Of the 25 discordant genetic alterations, two were undetected despite being covered in the AmoyDx (one EGFR variant and one ROS1 fusion). Furthermore, there were potential false positives in the ODxTT (nine MET exon 14 skippings) and in the AmoyDx (five variants, six ROS1 and three RET fusions). These potential false positives in the AmoyDx likely due to non-specific amplification, which was validated by the unique molecular barcoding sequencing. The ODxTT missed two uncovered EGFR rare variants, which was visually confirmed in the raw sequencing data. Our study provides insights into real-world performance of CDx tests for lung cancer and ensures reliability to advance precision medicine.

Retrospective Analysis to Optimize the Detection of MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Our study optimized METex14 skipping mutation detection by analyzing 223 Oncomine™ Focus Assay-positive cases using Pan Lung Cancer PCR Panel and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. Among the 11 METex14 skipping mutation-positive cases (average read counts: 1390), 2 with Oncomine™ Focus Assay read counts of 2540 and 10,177 were positive on all platforms. Those with Oncomine™ Focus Assay read counts ranging from 179 to 612 tested negative elsewhere. Specimens with low ratios (average ratio: 0.12% for nine cases) may yield false-positive results. Our results suggested that monitoring read counts and ratios and validating the results with RT-PCR are crucial to prevent false positives.

Genomic and Immune Landscape Comparison of MET Exon 14 Skipping and MET-Amplified Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Mutation or amplification of the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) tyrosine kinase receptor causes dysregulation of receptor function and stimulates tumor growth in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the most common mutation being MET exon 14 (METex14). We sought to compare the genomic and immune landscape of MET-altered NSCLC with MET wild-type NSCLC.

METHODS

18,047 NSCLC tumors were sequenced with Tempus xT assay. Tumors were categorized based on MET exon 14 (METex14) mutations; low MET amplification defined as a copy number gain (CNG) 6-9, high MET amplification defined as CNG ≥ 10, and MET other type mutations. Immuno-oncology (IO) biomarkers and the frequency of other somatic gene alterations were compared across MET-altered and MET wild-type groups.

RESULTS

276 (1.53%) METex14, 138 (0.76%) high METamp, 63 (0.35%) low METamp, 27 (0.15%) MET other, and 17,543 (97%) MET wild-type were identified. Patients with any MET mutation including METex14 were older, while patients with METex14 were more frequently female and nonsmokers. MET gene expression was highest in METamp tumors. PD-L1 positivity rates were higher in MET-altered groups than MET wild-type. METex14 exhibited the lowest tumor mutational burden (TMB) and lowest neoantigen tumor burden (NTB). METamp exhibited the lowest proportion of CD4 T cells and the highest proportion of NK cells. There were significant differences in co-alterations between METamp and METex14.

CONCLUSIONS

METex14 tumors exhibited differences in IO biomarkers and the somatic landscape compared to non-METex14 NSCLC tumors. Variations in immune profiles can affect immunotherapy selection in MET-altered NSCLC and require further exploration.

Multicenter evaluation of an automated, multiplex, RNA-based molecular assay for detection of ALK, ROS1, RET fusions and MET exon 14 skipping in NSCLC

The current study assessed the performance of the fully automated RT-PCR-based Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay, which simultaneously covers the advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (aNSCLC) actionable ALK, ROS1, RET, and MET exon 14 rearrangements, in a routine clinical setting involving 12 European clinical centers. The Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay detects fusions using fusion-specific as well as expression imbalance detection, the latter enabling detection of uncommon fusions not covered by fusion-specific assays. In total, 326 archival aNSCLC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples were included of which 44% were resected specimen, 46% tissue biopsies, and 9% cytological specimen. With a total of 179 biomarker-positive cases (i.e., 85 ALK, 33 ROS1, 20 RET fusions and 41 MET exon 14 skipping), this is one of the largest fusion-positive datasets ever tested. The results of the Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay were compared with earlier results of routine reference technologies including fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing, establishing a high sensitivity/specificity of 96.1%/99.6% for ALK, 96.7%/99.0% for ROS1, 100%/99.3% for RET fusion, and 92.5%/99.6% for MET exon 14 skipping, and a low failure rate (0.9%). The Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay was found to be a reliable, sensitive, and specific tool for routine detection of ALK, ROS1, RET fusions and MET exon 14 skipping. Given its short turnaround time of about 3 h, it is a time-efficient upfront screening tool in FFPE samples, supporting rapid clinical decision making. Moreover, expression-imbalance-based detection of potentially novel fusions may be easily verified with other routine technologies without delaying treatment initiation.

Targeted therapeutic options in early and metastatic NSCLC-overview

The complex therapeutic strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed significantly in recent years. Disease-free survival increased significantly with immunotherapy and chemotherapy registered in perioperative treatments, as well as adjuvant registered immunotherapy and targeted therapy (osimertinib) in case of EGFR mutation. In oncogenic-addictive metastatic NSCLC, primarily in adenocarcinoma, the range of targeted therapies is expanding, with which the expected overall survival increases significantly, measured in years. By 2021, the FDA and EMA have approved targeted agents to inhibit EGFR activating mutations, T790 M resistance mutation, BRAF V600E mutation, ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET fusion. In 2022, the range of authorized target therapies was expanded. With therapies that inhibit KRASG12C, EGFR exon 20, HER2 and MET. Until now, there was no registered targeted therapy for the KRAS mutations, which affect 30% of adenocarcinomas. Thus, the greatest expectation surrounded the inhibition of the KRAS G12C mutation, which occurs in ∼15% of NSCLC, mainly in smokers and is characterized by a poor prognosis. Sotorasib and adagrasib are approved as second-line agents after at least one prior course of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Adagrasib in first-line combination with pembrolizumab immunotherapy proved more beneficial, especially in patients with high expression of PD-L1. In EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation of lung adenocarcinoma, amivantanab was registered for progression after platinum-based chemotherapy. Lung adenocarcinoma carries an EGFR exon 20, HER2 insertion mutation in 2%, for which the first targeted therapy is trastuzumab deruxtecan, in patients already treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Two orally administered selective c-MET inhibitors, capmatinib and tepotinib, were also approved after chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma carrying MET exon 14 skipping mutations of about 3%. Incorporating reflex testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) expands personalized therapies by identifying guideline-recommended molecular alterations.

MET exon 14 skipping mutation drives cancer progression and recurrence via activation of SMAD2 signalling

BACKGROUND

c-Met encoded by the proto-oncogene MET, also known as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor, plays a crucial role in cellular processes. MET exon 14 skipping alteration (METΔ14EX) is a newly discovered MET mutation. SMAD2 is an important downstream transcription factor in TGF-β pathway. Unfortunately, the mechanisms by which METΔ14EX leads to oncogenic transformation are scarcely understood. The relationship between METΔ14EX and SMAD2 has not been studied yet.

METHODS

We generate METΔ14EX models by CRISPR-Cas9. In vitro transwell, wound-healing, soft-agar assay, in vivo metastasis and subcutaneous recurrence assay were used to study the role of METΔ14EX in tumour progression. RNA-seq, Western blotting, co-immunoprecipitation (CO-IP) and immunofluorescent were performed to explore the interaction between c-Met and SMAD2.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated that METΔ14EX, independent of HGF, can prolong the constitutive activation of c-Met downstream signalling pathways by impeding c-Met degradation and facilitating tumour metastasis and recurrence. Meanwhile, METΔ14EX strengthens the interaction between c-Met and SMAD2, promoting SMAD2 phosphorylation. Therapeutically, MET inhibitor crizotinib impedes METΔ14EX-mediated tumour metastasis by decreasing SMAD2 phosphorylation.

CONCLUSIONS

These data elucidated the previously unrecognised role of METΔ14EX in cancer progression via activation of SMAD2 independent of TGF-β, which helps to develop more effective therapies for such patients. METΔ14EX alteration significantly triggers tumour progression via activation of SMAD2 signalling that are involved in activating tumour invasion, metastasis and recurrence. On the left, in the MET wild-type (METWT), the juxtamembrane (JM) domain is involved in the regulation of tyrosine kinase activity, receptor degradation, and caspase cleavage. On the right, the METΔ14EX mutation leads to the loss of the juxtamembrane domain, resulting in an abnormal MET protein lacking a CBL-binding site. This causes the accumulation of truncated MET receptors followed by constitutive activation of the MET signalling pathway. Thus, the METΔ14EX-mutated protein has strong binding and phosphorylation to SMAD2, which results in the phosphorylation of a large number of SMAD2/3 proteins that combine with SMAD4 to form a complex in the nucleus, activating downstream signalling pathways, such as EMT and ECM remodelling, resulting in tumour progression and recurrence. TF transcription factor.

The Treatment of a New Entity in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation

BACKGROUND

MET (MET Proto-Oncogene, Receptor Tyrosine Kinase) exon 14 skipping mutation represents one of the most common MET alterations, accounting for approximately 1-3% of all mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinomas. While until 2020 no specific treatment was available for this subset of patients, as of today, three MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved in this setting, namely capmatinib, tepotinib and savolitinib.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to provide an extensive overview of the current therapeutic standard of care for exon 14 skipped advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients, alongside with mentions of the main future challenges and opportunities.

CONCLUSION

FDA-approved MET-TKIs currently represent the best option for treating exon 14 skipped advanced NSCLC patients, thanks to their excellent efficacy profile, alongside their manageable safety and tolerability. However, we currently lack specific agents to treat patients progressing on capmatinib or tepotinib, due to a limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying both on- and off-target resistance. In this respect, on-target mutations presently constitute the most explored ones from a mechanistic point of view, and type II MET-TKIs are currently under investigation as the most promising agents capable of overcoming the acquired resistance.

Biomarker Testing for Actionable Alterations in NSCLC-Perspectives from US-Based Academic and Community Oncologists: A Podcast

The identification of actionable oncogenic driver mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer impacts therapy selection, and appropriate therapy administration results in improvements in clinical outcomes. Although biomarker testing for actionable oncogenic driver mutations is recommended in national and international guidelines, there are still unmet needs in the real world. Through this podcast we provide, from a US perspective, an overview and discuss challenges in biomarker testing from both an academic and a community oncologist viewpoint. We describe the importance of comprehensive testing, actionable biomarkers as recommended by guidelines such as National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) and European Society for Medical Oncology, types of tests and assessment techniques for detection of actionable biomarkers, and challenges in testing. These challenges include the lack of awareness of the biomarker testing guidelines among physicians, inconsistent reimbursement, longer turnaround time resulting in delays in therapy initiation, and nihilism associated with particular patient characteristics. To tackle these challenges, we offer recommendations from the perspective of our own clinical settings.

Real-world analysis of MET exon 14 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study from two Swedish hospitals

BACKGROUND

Real-World evidence on mesenchymal-epithelial transition exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14) in lung cancer remains limited. With an incidence of 3-4% across histological subtypes, METex14 is now an actionable target for MET inhibitors (METi) in advanced lung cancer, demonstrating response rates between 30-70%. Yet, its role in early stages and sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still under exploration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of lung cancer patients presenting with METex14 across all stages. These patients were treated at two Swedish University Hospitals: Karolinska and Skåne, between the years 2014 and 2022.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 63 patients, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria. The median overall survival (OS) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) according to the stage was not reached (NR) for stage I, NR for stage II, 15 months (95% CI, 5.4-24.6) for stage III, and 17 months (95% CI, 9.2-NR) for stage IV. The median OS for stage IV patients who received a METi was 17 months (95% CI, 9.5-NR) vs. 10 months (95% CI, 6.2-NR) in patients without METi (p = 0.92; Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.07). The median OS for stage IV patients who received ICIs was 18 months (95% CI, 16.5-NR) vs. 6 months (95% CI, 2.5-NR) in patients without ICIs (p = 0.15; HR = 0.47). The median OS for stage IV patients who received chemotherapy was 17 months (95% CI, 9.7-NR) vs. 10 months (95% CI, 4.5-NR) in patients without (p = 0.97; HR = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest limited survival benefits from METi, ICIs, and chemotherapy for METex14 lung cancer patients. While not statistically significant, these findings underscore the need for larger trials for validation. Identifying effective treatments for this challenging lung cancer subtype remains a priority.

Profile of Capmatinib for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Patient Selection and Perspectives

Aberrant c-MET (Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition) signaling contributes to cancer cell development, proliferation, and metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation is noted in approximately 4% of NSCLC cases and is targetable with the recently approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors capmatinib and tepotinib. Capmatinib, the focus of this review article, is a highly selective MET inhibitor approved for use in patients with METex14 mutated NSCLC. In this review, we discuss cMET as a target, the pharmacology of capmatinib, key trials of capmatinib in MET-altered lung cancer, and toxicity profile. We highlight some ongoing capmatinib clinical trials that expand their role to other subsets of patients, especially those with EGFR mutations, who develop MET alterations as a resistance pathway. We further provide our perspective on the management of METex14 NSCLC, strategies for sequencing agents, and toxicity management.

A rapid, multiplex digital PCR assay to detect gene variants and fusions in non-small cell lung cancer

Digital PCR (dPCR) is emerging as an ideal platform for the detection and tracking of genomic variants in cancer due to its high sensitivity and simple workflow. The growing number of clinically actionable cancer biomarkers creates a need for fast, accessible methods that allow for dense information content and high accuracy. Here, we describe a proof-of-concept amplitude modulation-based multiplex dPCR assay capable of detecting 12 single-nucleotide and insertion/deletion (indel) variants in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and ERBB2, 14 gene fusions in ALK, RET, ROS1, and NTRK1, and MET exon 14 skipping present in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also demonstrate the use of multi-spectral target-signal encoding to improve the specificity of variant detection by reducing background noise by up to an order of magnitude. The assay reported an overall 100% positive percent agreement (PPA) and 98.5% negative percent agreement (NPA) compared with a sequencing-based assay in a cohort of 62 human formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. In addition, the dPCR assay rescued actionable information in 10 samples that failed to sequence, highlighting the utility of a multiplexed dPCR assay as a potential reflex solution for challenging NSCLC samples.

Analytical Performance and Concordance with Next-Generation Sequencing of a Rapid, Multiplexed dPCR Panel for the Detection of DNA and RNA Biomarkers in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

FDA approval of targeted therapies for lung cancer has significantly improved patient survival rates. Despite these improvements, barriers to timely access to biomarker information, such as nucleic acid input, still exist. Here, we report the analytical performance and concordance with next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a highly multiplexed research-use-only (RUO) panel using digital PCR (dPCR). The panel's analytical sensitivity and reactivity were determined using contrived DNA and RNA mixes. The limit of blank was established by testing FFPE curls classified as negative by pathology. Concordance was established on 77 FFPE samples previously characterized using the Oncomine Precision Assay®, and any discordant results were resolved with Archer Fusionplex® and Variantplex® panels. The analytical sensitivity, reported as the estimated mutant allele fraction (MAF), for DNA targets ranged from 0.1 to 0.9%. For RNA targets (ALK, RET, ROS, NTRK 1/2/3 Fusions, and MET Exon 14 skipping alteration), the analytical sensitivity ranged from 23 to 101 detected counts with 5 ng of total RNA input. The population prevalence-based coverage ranged from 89.2% to 100.0% across targets and exceeded 99.0% in aggregate. The assay demonstrated >97% concordance with respect to the comparator method.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of First-Line Immunotherapy Among Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Harboring BRAF, MET, or HER2 Alterations

Introduction

Data on utilization and clinical outcomes of programmed cell death protein or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors in NSCLC with uncommon oncogenic alterations is limited.

Methods

This retrospective study used a deidentified U.S. nationwide clinicogenomic database to select patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations, diagnosed from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2020, who initiated first-line therapy. Our objectives were to summarize characteristics and treatment patterns for patients with four little-studied genomic alterations or driver-negative NSCLC. We estimated Kaplan-Meier real-world time on treatment (rwTOT) and time to next treatment for patients receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors. The data cutoff was September 30, 2021.

Results

Of the 3971 eligible patients, 84 (2%) had NSCLC with BRAF V600E mutation, 117 (3%) had MET exon 14 skipping mutation, 130 (3%) had MET amplification, 91 (2%) had ERBB2 activation mutation, and 691 patients (17%) had driver-negative NSCLC. Patient characteristics differed among cohorts as expected. The most common first-line regimen in each cohort was a PD-(L)1 inhibitor as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. The median rwTOT with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy was 4.6 months in the driver-negative cohort and ranged from 2.9 months (ERBB2 mutation) to 7.6 months (BRAF V600E mutation). The median rwTOT with anti-PD-(L)1-chemotherapy combination was 5.2 months in the driver-negative cohort and 6 months in all but the BRAF V600E cohort (17.5 mo). The patterns of real-world time to next treatment results were similar.

Conclusions

Substantial use of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy and associated clinical outcomes are consistent with previous real-world findings and suggest no detriment from PD-(L)1 inhibitors for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring one of these four genomic alterations relative to driver-negative NSCLC.

MET Exon 14 Skipping in NSCLC: A Systematic Literature Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping is a rare oncogenic driver in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for which targeted therapy with MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was recently approved. Given the heterogeneity in published data of METex14 skipping NSCLC, we conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate its frequency, patient characteristics, and outcomes.

METHODS

On June 13, 2022 we conducted a systematic literature review of publications and conference abstracts reporting frequency, patient characteristics, or outcomes of patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC.

RESULTS

We included 139 studies reporting frequency or patient characteristics (350,997 patients), and 39 studies reporting clinical outcomes (3989 patients). Median METex14 skipping frequency was 2.0% in unselected patients with NSCLC, with minimal geographic variation. Median frequency was 2.4% in adenocarcinoma or nonsquamous subgroups, 12.0% in sarcomatoid, and 1.3% in squamous histology. Patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC were more likely to be elderly, have adenocarcinoma histology; there was no marked sex or smoking status distribution. In first line of treatment, median objective response rate ranged from 50.7% to 68.8% with targeted therapies (both values correspond to MET TKIs), was 33.3% with immunotherapy, and ranged from 23.1% to 27.0% with chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with METex14 skipping are more likely to have certain characteristics, but no patient subgroup can be ruled out; thus, it is crucial to test all patients with NSCLC to identify suitable candidates for MET inhibitor therapy. MET TKIs appeared to result in higher efficacy outcomes, although no direct comparison with chemotherapy or immunotherapy regimens was found.

Complete pathological response and negative postoperative ctDNA were not predictive of discontinuation of adjuvant crizotinib therapy in a patient with locally advanced MET ex14 skipping mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a case report

Neoadjuvant targeted therapy is an alternative treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with driver gene mutation. MET ex14 mutation is considered a driver gene, and crizotinib is the first oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for metastatic MET ex14 mutation-positive NSCLC patients. Here, we reported a case of a locally advanced NSCLC patient harboring MET ex14 mutation who achieved pathological complete response following neoadjuvant crizotinib therapy but developed rapid metastasis due to discontinuation of short-term postoperative adjuvant crizotinib therapy. Although no driver gene mutation was found via next-generation sequencing (NGS) with blood samples before discontinuation of adjuvant crizotinib, the patient was given crizotinib rechallenge. Fortunately, the patient achieved durable complete response. This suggested that neither pathological complete response nor negative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be an effective predictor for discontinuation of adjuvant targeted therapy. This case report demonstrated the potential of crizotinib as neoadjuvant therapy in MET ex14 mutation-positive NSCLC patients as well as the importance of long-term postoperative therapy even with negative ctDNA in blood.

The Development and Role of Capmatinib in the Treatment of MET-Dysregulated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Narrative Review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of death, but over the past decade, there has been tremendous progress in the field with new targeted therapies. The mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) proto-oncogene has been implicated in multiple solid tumors, including NSCLC, and dysregulation in NSCLC from MET can present most notably as MET exon 14 skipping mutation and amplification. From this, MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed to treat this dysregulation despite challenges with efficacy and reliable biomarkers. Capmatinib is a Type Ib MET TKI first discovered in 2011 and was FDA approved in August 2022 for advanced NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutation. In this narrative review, we discuss preclinical and early-phase studies that led to the GEOMETRY mono-1 study, which showed beneficial efficacy in MET exon 14 skipping mutations, leading to FDA approval of capmatinib along with Foundation One CDx assay as its companion diagnostic assay. Current and future directions of capmatinib are focused on improving the efficacy, overcoming the resistance of capmatinib, and finding approaches for new indications of capmatinib such as acquired MET amplification from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKI resistance. Clinical trials now involve combination therapy with capmatinib, including amivantamab, trametinib, and immunotherapy. Furthermore, new drug agents, particularly antibody-drug conjugates, are being developed to help treat patients with acquired resistance from capmatinib and other TKIs.

Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis, Biomarker Testing, and Clinical Management of Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition Exon 14 Skipping Mutations in the Middle East, Africa, and Russia

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations occur in about 3%-4% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is an aggressive subtype associated with poor prognosis. METex14 skipping is a potentially targetable mutation. Targeted therapy is a promising treatment modality for patients with advanced/metastatic METex14-mutant NSCLC. Performing systematic molecular testing to detect the driver mutation is essential for initiating targeted therapy. However, there is a lack of guidelines on molecular testing for assessing the eligibility of patients for targeted therapy. Therefore, a multidisciplinary panel consisting of experts from the Middle East, Africa, and Russia convened via a virtual advisory board meeting to provide their insights on various molecular testing techniques for the diagnosis of METex14 skipping mutation, management of patients with targeted therapies, and developing consensus recommendations for improving the processes. The expert panel emphasized performing molecular testing and liquid biopsy before treatment initiation and tissue re-biopsy for patients with failed molecular testing. Liquid biopsy was recommended as complementary to tissue biopsy for disease monitoring and prognosis. Selective MET inhibitors were recommended as the first and subsequent lines of therapy. These consensus recommendations will facilitate the management of METex14 skipping NSCLC in routine practice and warrant optimum outcomes for these patients.

MiRNA-Based Therapies for Lung Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges?

Lung cancer is a commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, posing a serious health risk. Despite new advances in immune checkpoint and targeted therapies in recent years, the prognosis for lung cancer patients, especially those in advanced stages, remains poor. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to modulate tumor development at multiple levels, and as such, miRNA mimics and molecules aimed at regulating miRNAs have shown promise in preclinical development. More importantly, miRNA-based therapies can also complement conventional chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies to reverse drug resistance and increase the sensitivity of lung cancer cells. Furthermore, small interfering RNA (siRNA) and miRNA-based therapies have entered clinical trials and have shown favorable development prospects. Therefore, in this paper, we review recent advances in miRNA-based therapies in lung cancer treatment as well as adjuvant therapy and present the current state of clinical lung cancer treatment. We also discuss the challenges facing miRNA-based therapies in the clinical application of lung cancer treatment to provide new ideas for the development of novel lung cancer therapies.

Rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer

Oncogenes that occur in ≤5% of non-small-cell lung cancers have been defined as 'rare'; nonetheless, this frequency can correspond to a substantial number of patients diagnosed annually. Within rare oncogenes, less commonly identified alterations (such as HRAS, NRAS, RIT1, ARAF, RAF1 and MAP2K1 mutations, or ERBB family, LTK and RASGRF1 fusions) can share certain structural or oncogenic features with more commonly recognized alterations (such as KRAS, BRAF, MET and ERBB family mutations, or ALK, RET and ROS1 fusions). Over the past 5 years, a surge in the identification of rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers has challenged the boundaries of traditional clinical grade diagnostic assays and profiling algorithms. In tandem, the number of approved targeted therapies for patients with rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer has risen dramatically. Rational drug design has iteratively improved the quality of small-molecule therapeutic agents and introduced a wave of antibody-based therapeutics, expanding the list of actionable de novo and resistance alterations in lung cancer. Getting additional molecularly tailored therapeutics approved for rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers in a larger range of countries will require ongoing stakeholder cooperation. Patient advocates, health-care agencies, investigators and companies with an interest in diagnostics, therapeutics and real-world evidence have already taken steps to surmount the challenges associated with research into low-frequency drivers.

The Role of cMET in Gastric Cancer—A Review of the Literature

Gastric cancer (GC) is an important cause of cancer worldwide with over one million new cases yearly. The vast majority of cases present in stage IV disease, and it still bears a poor prognosis. However, since 2010, progress has been made with the introduction of targeted therapies against HER2 and with checkpoint inhibitors (PDL1). More agents interfering with other targets (FGFR2B, CLDN18.2) are being investigated. cMET is a less frequent molecular target that has been studied for gastric cancer. It is a proto-oncogene that leads to activation of the MAPK pathway and the PI3K pathway, which is responsible for activating the MTOR pathway. The prevalence of cMET is strongly debated as different techniques are being used to detect MET-driven tumors. Because of the difference in diagnostic assays, selecting patients who benefit from cMET inhibitors is difficult. In this review, we discuss the pathway of cMET, its clinical significance and the different diagnostic assays that are currently used, such as immunohistochemy (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), the H-score and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Next, we discuss all the current data on cMET inhibitors in gastric cancer. Since the data on cMET inhibitors are very heterogenous, it is difficult to provide a general consensus on the outcome, as inclusion criteria differ between trials. Diagnosing cMET-driven gastric tumors is difficult, and potentially the only accurate determination of cMET overexpression/amplification may be next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of lung cancer patients with the MET exon 14 skipping mutation: A single-center real-world study

Introduction

The MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) mutation is an important oncogenic driver in lung cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from lung cancer patients with the METex14 mutation to analyze their survival outcomes and associated prognostic factors.

Methods

A one-step reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to examine the presence of the METex14 mutation was performed using RNA samples from 1374 lung cancer patients with no detected EGFR and ALK mutations. Pathological features and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results for c-MET were analyzed in patients with METex14-positive tumors.

Results

METex14 was identified in 69 patients with lung cancer, including 53 adenocarcinoma (ADC) and 16 non-ADC patients. In comparison with patients without the METex14 mutation, lung cancer patients harboring the METex14 mutation were generally elderly individuals, never-smokers, and had poor performance scores. A higher frequency of METex14 mutations was detected in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) patients (24.3%, n = 9/37). However, stage IV PSC patients with or without the METex14 mutations showed similarly poor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.429). For all 36 METex14-positive lung ADCs, multivariate analysis showed several poor prognostic factors, including strong c-MET IHC staining (p = 0.006), initial brain metastasis (p = 0.005), and administration of only supportive care (p &lt; 0.001). After excluding seven patients who received only supportive care, we further analyzed 29 stage IV lung ADC patients with METex14 mutations who received anti-cancer treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that pemetrexed treatment (p = 0.003), lung radiotherapy (p = 0.020), initial brain metastasis (p = 0.005), and strong c-MET IHC staining (p = 0.012) were independent prognostic factors for OS in these patients.

Conclusions

A higher frequency of METex14 mutations was detected in PSC patients. Stage IV PSC patients with or without the METex14 mutations had similarly poor overall survival. Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, strong c-MET ICH staining, initial brain metastasis, and lung radiotherapy, may help predict survival outcomes in patients with advanced lung ADCs harboring the METex14 mutation.

Liquid Biopsies in Lung Cancer

As lung cancer has the highest cancer-specific mortality rates worldwide, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to detect early-stage tumors and to monitor their response to the therapy. In addition to the well-established tissue biopsy analysis, liquid-biopsy-based assays may evolve as an important diagnostic tool. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is the most established method, followed by other methods such as the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs). Both PCR- and NGS-based assays are used for the mutational assessment of lung cancer, including the most frequent driver mutations. However, ctDNA analysis might also play a role in monitoring the efficacy of immunotherapy and its recent accomplishments in the landscape of state-of-the-art lung cancer therapy. Despite the promising aspects of liquid-biopsy-based assays, there are some limitations regarding their sensitivity (risk of false-negative results) and specificity (interpretation of false-positive results). Hence, further studies are needed to evaluate the usefulness of liquid biopsies for lung cancer. Liquid-biopsy-based assays might be integrated into the diagnostic guidelines for lung cancer as a tool to complement conventional tissue sampling.

MET Exon 14 Variants in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Prevalence, Clinicopathologic and Molecular Features

Somatic MET exon 14 skipping mutations (MET ex14) are targetable driver mutations for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), responsive to MET inhibitors. Objective: This study seeks to further characterize the clinicopathologic features and mutational profile of MET ex14 variant NSCLC. Design: Retrospective review of all MET ex14 tested NSCLC. Testing for selected BRAF, EGFR, HER2, KRAS, and MET mutations was performed using a clinically validated NGS assay, followed by MiSeq sequencing. Variants were classified as significant (Tier1/2) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS) per 2017 AMP/ASCO/CAP Joint Consensus Guidelines. PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Results: Of 2296 NSCLCs tested between 2017-7/2019, MET ex14 variants were present in 44 (1.9%). A total of 32 of 44 variants were MET exon 14 skipping, while the other 12 mutations were significant missense (3) or VUS (9). Of nine VUS, five were adjacent to the canonical splice site and likely to impact splicing. Four cases had concomitant mutations. Of 35 cases with known clinical staging, stage 1–2 = 20 (57%), stage 3 = 3 (9%), and stage 4 = 12 (34%). Of 19 resected NSCLSs, histological types and growth pattern included 7 lepidic pattern-predominant. A high percentage of tumors with MET ex14 mutations are positive for PD-L1, and the percentage of cases with PD-L1 expression >50% trends higher in more advanced disease. Conclusions: Most MET variants identified in our cohort (73%) are MET ex14 skipping. The prevalence of MET ex14 variants is 1.9%, and a large percentage of tumors has lower clinical stage and less aggressive pathologic features.

An Italian Multicenter Perspective Harmonization Trial for the Assessment of MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations in Standard Reference Samples

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. International societies have promoted the molecular analysis of MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) exon 14 skipping for the clinical stratification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Different technical approaches are available to detect MET exon 14 skipping in routine practice. Here, the technical performance and reproducibility of testing strategies for MET exon 14 skipping carried out in various centers were evaluated. In this retrospective study, each institution received a set (n = 10) of a customized artificial formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell line (Custom METex14 skipping FFPE block) that harbored the MET exon 14 skipping mutation (Seracare Life Sciences, Milford, MA, USA), which was previously validated by the Predictive Molecular Pathology Laboratory at the University of Naples Federico II. Each participating institution managed the reference slides according to their internal routine workflow. MET exon 14 skipping was successfully detected by all participating institutions. Molecular analysis highlighted a median Cq cut off of 29.3 (ranging from 27.1 to 30.7) and 2514 (ranging from 160 to 7526) read counts for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and NGS-based analyses, respectively. Artificial reference slides were a valid tool to harmonize technical workflows in the evaluation of MET exon 14 skipping molecular alterations in routine practice.

New Targeted Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer ranks first in cancer mortality in Korea and cancer incidence in Korean men. More than half of Korean lung cancer patients undergo chemotherapy, including adjuvant therapy. Cytotoxic agents, targeted therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are used in chemotherapy according to the biopsy and genetic test results. Among chemotherapy, the one that has developed rapidly is targeted therapy. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines have been updated recently for targeted therapy of multiple gene mutations, and targeted therapy is used not only for chemotherapy but also for adjuvant therapy. While previously targeted therapies have been developed for common genetic mutations, recently targeted therapies have been developed to overcome uncommon mutations or drug resistance that have occurred since previous targeted therapy. Therefore, this study describes recent, rapidly developing targeted therapies.

Landscape of Savolitinib Development for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with MET Alteration-A Narrative Review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasingly being treated with targeted therapies. Savolitinib (Orpathys^®) is highly selective mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which is conditionally approved in China for advanced NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14). This article summarizes the clinical development of savolitinib, as a monotherapy in NSCLC with METex14 mutation and in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor in post EGFR-TKI resistance NSCLC due to MET-based acquired resistance. Preclinical models demonstrated anti-tumor activities in MET-driven cancer cell line and xenograft tumor models. The Phase Ia/Ib study established an optimized, recommended phase II dose in Chinese NSCLC patients, while TATTON study of savolitinib plus osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutant, MET-amplified and TKI-progressed NSCLC showed beneficial efficacy with acceptable safety profile. In a pivotal phase II study, Chinese patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma, brain metastasis and other NSCLC subtype positive for METex14 mutation showed notable responses and acceptable safety profile with savolitinib. Currently, results from ongoing clinical trials are eagerly anticipated to confirm the efficacious and safety benefits of savolitinib as monotherapy and in combination with EGFR-TKI in acquired resistance setting in advanced NSCLC and its subtypes with MET alterations.

Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG) Expert Consensus Statement on MET Alterations in NSCLC: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease, with many oncogenic driver mutations, including de novo mutations in the Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition (MET) gene (specifically in Exon 14 [ex14]), that lead to tumourigenesis. Acquired alterations in the MET gene, specifically MET amplification is also associated with the development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Although MET has become an actionable biomarker with the availability of MET-specific inhibitors in selected countries, there is differential accessibility to diagnostic platforms and targeted therapies across countries in Asia-Pacific (APAC). The Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG), an interdisciplinary group of experts from Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Mainland China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam, discussed testing for MET alterations and considerations for using MET-specific inhibitors at a consensus meeting in January 2022, and in subsequent offline consultation. Consensus recommendations are provided by the ATORG group to address the unmet need for standardised approaches to diagnosing MET alterations in NSCLC and for using these therapies. MET inhibitors may be considered for first-line or second or subsequent lines of treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC harbouring MET ex14 skipping mutations; MET ex14 testing is preferred within multi-gene panels for detecting targetable driver mutations in NSCLC. For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and MET amplification leading to EGFR TKI resistance, enrolment in combination trials of EGFR TKIs and MET inhibitors is encouraged.

MET Signaling Pathways, Resistance Mechanisms, and Opportunities for Target Therapies

The MET gene, known as MET proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase, was first identified to induce tumor cell migration, invasion, and proliferation/survival through canonical RAS-CDC42-PAK-Rho kinase, RAS-MAPK, PI3K-AKT-mTOR, and β-catenin signaling pathways, and its driver mutations, such as MET gene amplification (METamp) and the exon 14 skipping alterations (METex14), activate cell transformation, cancer progression, and worse patient prognosis, principally in lung cancer through the overactivation of their own oncogenic and MET parallel signaling pathways. Because of this, MET driver alterations have become of interest in lung adenocarcinomas since the FDA approval of target therapies for METamp and METex14 in 2020. However, after using MET target therapies, tumor cells develop adaptative changes, favoring tumor resistance to drugs, the main current challenge to precision medicine. Here, we review a link between the resistance mechanism and MET signaling pathways, which is not only limited to MET. The resistance impacts MET parallel tyrosine kinase receptors and signals shared hubs. Therefore, this information could be relevant in the patient's mutational profile evaluation before the first target therapy prescription and follow-up to reduce the risk of drug resistance. However, to develop a resistance mechanism to a MET inhibitor, patients must have access to the drugs. For instance, none of the FDA approved MET inhibitors are registered as such in Chile and other developing countries. Constant cross-feeding between basic and clinical research will thus be required to meet future challenges imposed by the acquired resistance to targeted therapies.

Refining patient selection of MET-activated non-small cell lung cancer through biomarker precision

Dysregulated MET signaling plays an important role in lung oncogenesis, tumor growth and invasiveness. It may occur through various mechanisms, such as MET overexpression or gene amplification or mutation, all of which can be detected by specific methods. The utility of MET overexpression as a biomarker remains unclear due to discrepancies in its occurrence and non-standardized cut-off thresholds. MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) was established as a strong predictor of response to selective MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and clinical trial results in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring METex14 led to the approval of capmatinib and tepotinib by regulatory agencies worldwide. MET amplification is an emerging biomarker, with clinical data indicating an association between MET gene copy number and response to MET-TKIs. Additionally, MET amplification represents an important mechanism of resistance to TKIs in oncogene-driven NSCLC. The identification of molecular alterations for which targeted therapies are available is important, and high-throughput next-generation sequencing techniques can provide information on multiple genes at the same time, helping to provide valuable predictive information for oncogene-driven cancers. This review summarizes the current methods used for the detection of METex14, MET amplification and MET overexpression, and discusses the evidence for the use of MET-TKIs in patients with NSCLC with MET dysregulation. We discuss the practical challenges that impact the use of METex14 in the clinic and the evidence gaps that need to be addressed to validate additional genomic markers for MET-dependent cancers.

Dramatic response to neoadjuvant savolitinib in marginally resectable lung adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping mutation: A case report and literature review

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) is a low-frequency driver mutation in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (3%-4%) and is associated with a poor prognosis. With the advent of selective MET inhibitors such as capmatinib, tepotinib, and savolitinib, the outcome for these patients was significantly improved. Here, we report a 76-year-old male patient with marginally resectable stage IIIB lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14 who was successfully treated with savolitinib for neoadjuvant therapy. An 82% shrinkage of the primary tumor was observed, and only 5% of the tumor was viable by pathology in the following radical surgery. A dozen of studies tested the efficiency of neoadjuvant immunotherapy or immunochemotherapy, but for NSCLC with driver mutations, neoadjuvant targeted therapy might be more appropriate. We advocated the neoadjuvant MET TKI treatment for NSCLC.

Integrative genomic analysis of drug resistance in MET exon 14 skipping lung cancer using patient-derived xenograft models

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driven by MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) occurs in 3-4% of NSCLC cases and defines a subset of patients with distinct characteristics. While MET targeted therapy has led to strong clinical results in METex14 patients, acquired drug resistance seemed to be unavoidable during treatment. Limited information is available regarding acquired resistance during MET targeted therapy, nor has there been any report on such patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) model facilitating the research.

Methods

We describe a patient case harboring METex14 who exhibited drug resistance after treatment with crizotinib. Subcutaneous xenografts were generated from pretreatment and post-resistance patient specimens. PDX mice were then treated with MET inhibitors (crizotinib and tepotinib) and EGFR-MET bispecific antibodies (EMB-01 and amivantamab) to evaluate their drug response in vivo. DNA and RNA sequencing analysis was performed on patient tumor specimens and matching xenografts.

Results

PDXs preserved most of the histological and molecular profiles of the parental tumors. Drug resistance to MET targeted therapy was confirmed in PDX models through in vivo drug analysis. Newly acquired MET D1228H mutations and EGFR amplificated were detected in patient-resistant tumor specimens. Although the mutations were not detected in the PDX, EGFR overexpression was observed in RNA sequencing analysis indicating possible off-target resistance through the EGFR bypass signaling pathway. As expected, EGFR-MET bispecific antibodies overcome drug resistant in the PDX model.

Conclusions

We detected a novel MET splice site deletion mutation that could lead to METex14. We also established and characterized a pair of METex14 NSCLC PDXs, including the first crizotinib resistant METex14 PDX. And dual inhibition of MET and EGFR might be a therapeutic strategy for EGFR-driven drug resistance METex14 lung cancer.

Optimising tissue acquisition and the molecular testing pathway for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A UK expert consensus statement

Targeted therapy against actionable variants has revolutionised the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approximately half of NSCLC adenocarcinomas have an actionable variant, making molecular testing a critical component of the diagnostic process to personalise therapeutic options, optimise clinical outcomes and minimise toxicity. Recently, genomic testing in England has undergone major changes with the introduction of Genomic Laboratory Hubs, designed to consolidate and enhance existing laboratory provision and deliver genomic testing as outlined in the National Genomic Test Directory. Similar changes are ongoing in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. However, multiple challenges exist with current tissue acquisition procedures and the molecular testing pathway in the UK, including quantity and quality of available tissue, adequacy rates, test availability among genomic laboratories, turnaround times, multidisciplinary team communication, and limited guidance and standardisation. The COVID-19 pandemic has added an extra layer of complexity. Herein, we summarise best practice recommendations, based on expert opinion, to overcome existing challenges in the UK. The least invasive biopsy technique should be undertaken with the aim of acquiring the greatest quality and quantity of tissue. Use of sedation should be considered to improve patient experience. Rapid on-site evaluation may also be useful to help guide adequate sampling, and liquid biopsy may be beneficial in some instances. Sample processing should be appropriate to facilitate biomarker testing, in particular, next-generation sequencing for comprehensive genomic information. Steps to optimise tissue utilisation and turnaround times, such as planning of tissue usage, limiting immunohistochemistry, tumour enrichment, and reflex testing at diagnosis, should be implemented. Guidelines for tissue acquisition and sample processing may help to improve sample adequacy to perform downstream testing. Communication among genomic laboratories will help to standardise test availability across England and local auditing could identify further areas for optimisation, including ways to improve turnaround times and adequacy rates.

Identification of Novel MET Exon 14 Skipping Variants in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Prototype Workflow Involving in Silico Prediction and RT-PCR

Background and aims: The MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) is an oncogenic driver mutation that provides a therapeutic opportunity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLCs) patients. This event often results from sequence changes at the MET canonical splicing sites. We characterize two novel non-canonical splicing site variants of MET that produce METex14. Materials and Methods: Two variants were identified in three advanced-stage NSCLC patients in a next-generation sequencing panel. The potential impact on splicing was predicted using in silico tools. METex14 mutation was confirmed using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and a Sanger sequencing analysis on RNA extracted from stained cytology smears. Results: The interrogated MET (RefSeq ID NM_000245.3) variants include a single nucleotide substitution, c.3028+3A>T, in intron 14 and a deletion mutation, c.3012_3028del, in exon 14. The in silico prediction analysis exhibited reduced splicing strength in both variants compared with the MET normal transcript. The RT-PCR and subsequent Sanger sequencing analyses confirmed METex14 skipping in all three patients carrying these variants. Conclusion: This study reveals two non-canonical MET splice variants that cause exon 14 skipping, concurrently also proposes a clinical workflow for the classification of such non-canonical splicing site variants detected by routine DNA-based NGS test. It shows the usefulness of in silico prediction to identify potential METex14 driver mutation and exemplifies the opportunity of routine cytology slides for RNA-based testing.

MET alterations in advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare subset of NSCLC that accounts for about 0.5-1% of all primary lung carcinoma, and its malignant biological behavior is more aggressive than other pathological types of lung cancer. Recent studies have reported a variety of gene mutations associated with the occurrence, development and treatment of PSC, especially the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) proto-oncogene alterations, including the exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations as well as the amplification and overexpression of MET gene, which are associated with molecularly targeted therapy for PSC. METex14 skipping mutation is the most common and well-studied mutation type, occurring in about 22-31.8% of PSC patients, while the prevalence of MET amplification is reported as 4.8-13.6% and MET ovexpression is about 20.2%. Molecular pathology tests, including IHC and NGS, are valuable in determining the prognosis of patients with PSC and helping to determine the treatment. The existing clinical data have confirmed the efficacy of MET-TKI in PSC patients with MET alteration, among which the clinical study of Savolitinib has enrolled the largest proportion of PSC patients and achieved relatively good efficacy, but more clinical researches are still needed. The multi-disciplinary team may maximize the optimal treatment options for patients with the advanced PSC.

NSCLC as the Paradigm of Precision Medicine at Its Finest: The Rise of New Druggable Molecular Targets for Advanced Disease

Standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) historically consisted of systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy until the early 2000s, when precision medicine led to a revolutionary change in the therapeutic scenario. The identification of oncogenic driver mutations in EGFR, ALK and ROS1 rearrangements identified a subset of patients who largely benefit from targeted agents. However, since the proportion of patients with druggable alterations represents a minority, the discovery of new potential driver mutations is still an urgent clinical need. We provide a comprehensive review of the emerging molecular targets in NSCLC and their applications in the advanced setting.

Companion Diagnostics and Predictive Biomarkers for MET-Targeted Therapy in NSCLC

Simple Summary

MET is a receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by the MET proto-oncogene that has a significant role in cancer cell progression. Several drugs targeting MET are under development for the treatment of different cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, until now, relatively few of these drugs have shown sufficient clinical activity and obtained regulatory approval. One of the reasons for this could be the lack of effective biomarkers to select the right patients for treatment. In a number of clinical trials, different biomarkers have been studied, but so far, MET exon 14 skipping mutation is the only one that has shown sufficient predictive properties. Another interesting biomarker is MET amplification detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which has shown promising results in the treatment of patients with NSCLC. Future clinical research will show whether MET amplification by FISH is an effective predictive biomarker for MET-targeted therapy.

Abstract

Dysregulation of the MET tyrosine kinase receptor is a known oncogenic driver, and multiple genetic alterations can lead to a clinically relevant oncogenesis. Currently, a number of drugs targeting MET are under development as potential therapeutics for different cancer indications, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, relatively few of these drugs have shown sufficient clinical activity and obtained regulatory approval. One of the reasons for this could be the lack of effective predictive biomarkers to select the right patient populations for treatment. So far, capmatinib is the only MET-targeted drug approved with a companion diagnostic (CDx) assay, which is indicated for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC in patients having a mutation resulting in MET exon 14 skipping. An alternative predictive biomarker for MET therapy is MET amplification, which has been identified as a resistance mechanism in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Results obtained from different clinical trials seem to indicate that the MET/CEP7 ratio detected by FISH possesses the best predictive properties, likely because this method excludes MET amplification caused by polysomy. In this article, the concept of CDx assays will be discussed, with a focus on the currently FDA-approved MET targeted therapies for the treatment of NSCLC.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC) of Tepotinib with Other MET Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced NSCLC with MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations

INTRODUCTION

MET exon 14 skipping in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), can be targeted with MET inhibitors including tepotinib, capmatinib, savolitinib, and crizotinib. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) methodology was used to compare outcomes data between agents and to address bias from differences in baseline characteristics.

METHODS

Patient-level data from the VISION study (tepotinib) were weighted for comparison with aggregate data from the GEOMETRY mono-1 (capmatinib), NCT02897479 (savolitinib) and PROFILE 1001 (crizotinib) studies in patients with aNSCLC, using baseline characteristics prognostic for overall survival (OS) in VISION. Overall response rate (ORR), OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR) were compared. Patients were stratified by line of therapy: overall (all lines), previously treated, and treatment-naïve.

RESULTS

Improvements in ORR and all time-to-event endpoints were predicted for tepotinib compared with crizotinib and savolitinib in the different populations, although comparisons with savolitinib were hindered by considerable differences in baseline patient populations. Tepotinib appeared to be associated with prolonged PFS and OS compared with capmatinib in previously treated patients (PFS HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.36-0.83; OS HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42-1.06) and the overall populations (PFS HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.43-0.86; OS HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.49-1.05), with smaller improvements in DOR. The ORR comparisons between tepotinib and capmatinib identified a swing of up to ± 6 percentage points in the weighted tepotinib ORR depending on the population studied (treatment-naïve vs. previously treated patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The MAIC identified potential differences in efficacy endpoints with the different MET inhibitors, and predicted prolonged PFS and OS with tepotinib compared with capmatinib and crizotinib. Although MAIC cannot balance for unobserved factors, it remains an informative method to contextualize single-arm studies, where head-to-head trials are unlikely to be feasible.

KRAS and MET in non-small-cell lung cancer: two of the new kids on the 'drivers' block

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease, and therapeutic management has advanced to identify various critical oncogenic mutations that promote lung cancer tumorigenesis. Subsequent studies have developed targeted therapies against these oncogenes in the hope of personalized treatment based on the tumor's molecular genomics. This review presents a comprehensive review of the biology, new therapeutic interventions, and resistance patterns of two well-defined subgroups, tumors with KRAS and MET alterations. We also discuss the status of molecular testing practices for these two key oncogenic drivers, considering the progressive introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and RNA sequencing in regular clinical practice.

Cancer Therapy Guided by Mutation Tests: Current Status and Perspectives

The administration of many cancer drugs is tailored to genetic tests. Some genomic events, e.g., alterations of EGFR or BRAF oncogenes, result in the conformational change of the corresponding proteins and call for the use of mutation-specific compounds. Other genetic perturbations, e.g., HER2 amplifications, ALK translocations or MET exon 14 skipping mutations, cause overproduction of the entire protein or its kinase domain. There are multilocus assays that provide integrative characteristics of the tumor genome, such as the analysis of tumor mutation burden or deficiency of DNA repair. Treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer requires testing for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET and KRAS gene alterations. Colorectal cancer patients need to undergo KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HER2 and microsatellite instability analysis. The genomic examination of breast cancer includes testing for HER2 amplification and PIK3CA activation. Melanomas are currently subjected to BRAF and, in some instances, KIT genetic analysis. Predictive DNA assays have also been developed for thyroid cancers, cholangiocarcinomas and urinary bladder tumors. There is an increasing utilization of agnostic testing which involves the analysis of all potentially actionable genes across all tumor types. The invention of genomically tailored treatment has resulted in a spectacular improvement in disease outcomes for a significant portion of cancer patients.

Robust home brew fragment sizing assay for detection of MET exon 14 skipping mutation in non-small cell lung cancer patients in resource constrained community hospitals

BACKGROUND

A mutation/deletion involving donor or acceptor sites for exon 14 results in splicing out of exon 14 of the mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) gene and is known as "MET exon 14 skipping" (ΔMET14). The two recent approvals with substantial objective responses and improved progression-free survival to MET inhibitors namely capmatinib and tepotinib necessitate the identification of this alteration upfront. We herein describe our experience of ΔMET14 detection by an mRNA-based assay using polymerase chain reaction followed by fragment sizing.

METHODS

This is a home brew assay which was developed with the concept that the transcripts from true ΔMET14 will be shorter by ~140 bases than their wild type counterparts. The cases which were called MET exon 14 skipping positive on next-generation sequencing (NGS) were subjected to this assay, along with 13 healthy controls in order to establish the validity for true negatives.

RESULTS

Thirteen cases of ΔMET14 mutation were detected on NGS using RNA-based sequencing. Considering NGS as a gold standard, the sizing assay using both gel and capillary electrophoresis that showed 100% specificity for both with concordance rates of 84.6% and 88.2% with NGS, respectively, were obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the cost-effective nature and easy to use procedures, this assay will prove beneficial for small- and medium-sized laboratories where skilled technical personnel and NGS platforms are unavailable.