1
|
Pichler T, Mumm F, Dehar N, Dickman E, Díez de Los Ríos de la Serna C, Dinkel A, Heinrich K, Hennink M, Parviainen AD, Raske V, Wicki N, Moore AC. Understanding communication between patients and healthcare professionals regarding comprehensive biomarker testing in precision oncology: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6913. [PMID: 38298115 PMCID: PMC10905543 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision oncology, using comprehensive biomarker testing (cBT) to inform individual cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment, includes increasingly complex technology and clinical data sets. People impacted by cancer (patients and caregivers) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) face distinct challenges in navigating the cBT and personalized treatment landscape. This review summarizes evidence regarding cBT-related communication between people impacted by cancer and HCPs and identifies important avenues for future research in precision oncology. METHODS A scoping review was conducted using records published in PubMed during January 2017-August 2022, focusing on the breadth of topics on patient-HCP communication and knowledge resources used by HCPs as guidance in cBT-related communication. Data were extracted from records meeting inclusion criteria, and findings were summarized according to main topics. RESULTS The search identified 287 unique records and data were extracted from 42 records, including nine from expert input. Most records originated from the United States included patients with different types of cancer, and oncologists were the main HCPs. Patients' motivation for undergoing cBT and receiving results was generally high in different settings. However, patients' understanding of cBT-related concepts was limited, and their knowledge and information preferences changed based on cBT implications and significance to family members. HCPs were valued by patients as a trusted source of information. Limited evidence was available on HCPs' information-seeking behavior and factors influencing cBT-related knowledge and confidence, often self-reported as insufficient. CONCLUSIONS Patient education by knowledgeable and confident HCPs, information management and a caring patient-HCP relationship communicating continuity of care regardless of cBT results are crucial to empower patients and shared decision-making in precision oncology. More data on the process and structure of cBT-related communication, distinction between and characterization of different timepoints of patient-HCP interactions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresia Pichler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University HospitalLMU MunichMunichGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University HospitalLMU MunichMunichGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | - Navdeep Dehar
- Department of Medical OncologyQueen's UniversityKingstonOntarioCanada
| | - Erin Dickman
- Oncology Nursing SocietyPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Celia Díez de Los Ríos de la Serna
- European Oncology Nursing SocietyBrusselsBelgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of NursingBarcelona UniversityBarcelonaCataloniaSpain
| | - Andreas Dinkel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and HealthTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich TUM (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | | | - Anndra D. Parviainen
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shickh S, Leventakos K, Lewis MA, Bombard Y, Montori VM. Shared Decision Making in the Care of Patients With Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e389516. [PMID: 37339391 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_389516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) is a method of care that is suitable for the care of patients with cancer. It involves a collaborative conversation seeking to respond sensibly to the problematic situation of the patient, cocreating a plan of care that makes sense intellectually, practically, and emotionally. Genetic testing to identify whether a patient has a hereditary cancer syndrome represents a prime example of the importance for SDM in oncology. SDM is important for genetic testing because not only results affect current cancer treatment, cancer surveillance, and care of relatives but also these tests generate both complex results and psychological concerns. SDM conversations should take place without interruptions, disruptions, or hurry and be supported, where available, by tools that assist in conveying the relevant evidence and in supporting plan development. Examples of these tools include treatment SDM encounter aids and the Genetics Adviser. Patients are expected to play a key role in making decisions and implementing plans of care, but several evolving challenges related to the unfettered access to information and expertise of varying trustworthiness and complexity in between interactions with clinicians can both support and complicate this role. SDM should result in a plan of care that is maximally responsive to the biology and biography of each patient, maximally supportive of each patient's goals and priorities, and minimally disruptive of their lives and loves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Shickh
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Konstantinos Leventakos
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mark A Lewis
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dutta R, Vallurupalli M, McVeigh Q, Huang FW, Rebbeck TR. Understanding inequities in precision oncology diagnostics. NATURE CANCER 2023; 4:787-794. [PMID: 37248397 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00568-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Advances in molecular diagnostics have enabled the identification of targetable driver pathogenic variants, forming the basis of precision oncology care. However, the adoption of new technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels, can exacerbate healthcare disparities. Here, we summarize data on use patterns of advanced biomarker testing, highlight the disparities in both accessing NGS testing and using this data to match patients to appropriate personalized therapies and propose multidisciplinary strategies to address inequities looking forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritika Dutta
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mounica Vallurupalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Cancer Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Quinn McVeigh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Cancer Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Franklin W Huang
- Cancer Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- San Francisco Veterans Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Habr D, Wolf Gianares B, Schuler KW, Chari D. Patients at the Heart of the Scientific Dialogue: An Industry Perspective. Oncol Ther 2023; 11:15-24. [PMID: 36705813 PMCID: PMC9881512 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-023-00220-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmaceutical companies need to regularly communicate to patients all essential information about their medicines, especially data from the research studies that were conducted to evaluate the medicine’s benefits and risks. To do that, companies will need to make sure patients have access to and awareness of relevant information. This can be achieved by ensuring medical information is freely available to the reader, and working with publishers to facilitate open access (free) publications. Companies should also help improve patients’ understanding of medical terminology, offer simplified versions of scientific content, and deliver information through various formats (print versus digital, text versus audio versus video) to address different learning styles and literacy levels. This will empower patients with knowledge and improve shared decision-making. It will also be essential for pharmaceutical companies to involve patients in various stages of medicine development, such as getting their input on how the research studies for investigating these medicines are designed and reported to ensure relevant information to patients are well-captured and clear. This should also go in parallel with providing opportunities to elevate the patient voice through patient-partnered research and authorship on topics particularly relevant to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dany Habr
- Pfizer Oncology, Pfizer Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10011, USA.
| | | | - Kristine W Schuler
- Pfizer Oncology, Pfizer Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10011, USA
| | - Dheepa Chari
- Pfizer Oncology, Pfizer Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10011, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tabernero J, Bowling TE, Rivers J, Chari D, Ghith J, Ferdinand R, Shanahan K, Shore ND. Improving access to oncology publications for advocates and people with cancer. Cancer 2022; 128:3757-3763. [PMID: 36098654 PMCID: PMC9826100 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Journal articles provide reliable and current information about cancer research. This can offer hope to people with cancer and help them make decisions about their care. Here, the authors suggest ways in which different groups may help people with cancer to find, view, and understand articles. For example, journals should make articles free to view if they describe research that could change patient care. Also, clear titles and easy-to-follow summaries or videos may help people to find relevant articles and understand the main findings. It is important to explore ways to best share research with all those whose lives it may affect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep Tabernero
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology, International Oncology Bureau‐Quiron, University of Vic‐Central University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Jamil Rivers
- METAvivor Research & SupportAnnapolisMarylandUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Neal D. Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research CenterMyrtle BeachSouth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Madoff DC, Abi-Jaoudeh N, Braxton D, Goyal L, Jain D, Odisio BC, Salem R, Schattner M, Sheth R, Li D. An Expert, Multidisciplinary Perspective on Best Practices in Biomarker Testing in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Oncologist 2022; 27:884-891. [PMID: 35925597 PMCID: PMC9526481 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that arises from the intrahepatic biliary tree and is associated with a poor prognosis. Until recently, the treatment landscape of advanced/metastatic iCCA has been limited primarily to chemotherapy. In recent years, the advent of biomarker testing has identified actionable genetic alterations in 40%-50% of patients with iCCA, heralding an era of precision medicine for these patients. Biomarker testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) has since become increasingly relevant in iCCA; however, several challenges and gaps in standard image-guided liver biopsy and processing have been identified. These include variability in tissue acquisition relating to the imaging modality used for biopsy guidance, the biopsy method used, number of passes, needle choice, specimen preparation methods, the desmoplastic nature of the tumor, as well as the lack of communication among the multidisciplinary team. Recognizing these challenges and the lack of evidence-based guidelines for biomarker testing in iCCA, a multidisciplinary team of experts including interventional oncologists, a gastroenterologist, medical oncologists, and pathologists suggest best practices for optimizing tissue collection and biomarker testing in iCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Madoff
- Corresponding author: David C. Madoff, MD, FSIR, FACR, FCIRSE, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. Tel: +1 203 785 5102; Fax: +1 203 737 1241;
| | | | - David Braxton
- Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | | | - Dhanpat Jain
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Riad Salem
- Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark Schattner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rahul Sheth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cho MT, Gholami S, Gui D, Tejaswi SL, Fananapazir G, Abi-Jaoudeh N, Jutric Z, Samarasena JB, Li X, Valerin JB, Mercer J, Dayyani F. Optimizing the Diagnosis and Biomarker Testing for Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:392. [PMID: 35053557 PMCID: PMC8773504 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogenous group of malignancies originating in the biliary tree, and associated with poor prognosis. Until recently, treatment options have been limited to surgical resection, liver-directed therapies, and chemotherapy. Identification of actionable genomic alterations with biomarker testing has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for these patients. However, several challenges exist to the seamless adoption of precision medicine in patients with CCA, relating to a lack of awareness of the importance of biomarker testing, hurdles in tissue acquisition, and ineffective collaboration among the multidisciplinary team (MDT). To identify gaps in standard practices and define best practices, multidisciplinary hepatobiliary teams from the University of California (UC) Davis and UC Irvine were convened; discussions of the meeting, including optimal approaches to tissue acquisition for diagnosis and biomarker testing, communication among academic and community healthcare teams, and physician education regarding biomarker testing, are summarized in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May T. Cho
- University of California Irvine Health, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.A.-J.); (Z.J.); (J.B.S.); (X.L.); (J.B.V.); (F.D.)
| | - Sepideh Gholami
- University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA; (S.G.); (D.G.)
| | - Dorina Gui
- University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA; (S.G.); (D.G.)
| | | | | | - Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh
- University of California Irvine Health, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.A.-J.); (Z.J.); (J.B.S.); (X.L.); (J.B.V.); (F.D.)
| | - Zeljka Jutric
- University of California Irvine Health, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.A.-J.); (Z.J.); (J.B.S.); (X.L.); (J.B.V.); (F.D.)
| | - Jason B. Samarasena
- University of California Irvine Health, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.A.-J.); (Z.J.); (J.B.S.); (X.L.); (J.B.V.); (F.D.)
| | - Xiaodong Li
- University of California Irvine Health, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.A.-J.); (Z.J.); (J.B.S.); (X.L.); (J.B.V.); (F.D.)
| | - Jennifer B. Valerin
- University of California Irvine Health, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.A.-J.); (Z.J.); (J.B.S.); (X.L.); (J.B.V.); (F.D.)
| | - Jacob Mercer
- Helsinn Therapeutics (U.S.), Inc., Iselin, NJ 08830, USA;
| | - Farshid Dayyani
- University of California Irvine Health, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.A.-J.); (Z.J.); (J.B.S.); (X.L.); (J.B.V.); (F.D.)
| |
Collapse
|