Up-Front Multigene Panel Testing for Cancer Susceptibility in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Pathogenic germline variants in patients with endometrial cancer of diverse ancestry

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in outcomes exist in endometrial cancer (EC). The contribution of ancestry-based variations in germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) is unknown.

METHODS

Germline assessment of ≥76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets sequencing from January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2021. Self-reported race/ethnicity and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry data classified patients into groups. Genetic ancestry was inferred from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. Rates of gPV and genetic counseling were compared by ancestry.

RESULTS

Among 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs; 15 had >1 gPV. Rates of gPV varied by self-reported ancestry (Ashkenazi Jewish, 40/202 [20%]; Asian, 15/124 [12%]; Black/African American (AA), 12/171 [7.0%]; Hispanic, 15/124 [12%]; non-Hispanic (NH) White, 129/927 [14%]; missing, 5/77 [6.5%]; p = .009], with similar findings by genetic ancestry (p < .001). We observed a lower likelihood of gPVs in patients of Black/AA (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81) and African (AFR) ancestry (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85) and a higher likelihood in patients of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic ancestry (OR, 1.62; 95% CI; 1.11-2.34) compared with patients of non-Hispanic White/European ancestry, even after adjustment for age and molecular subtype. Somatic landscape influenced gPVs with lower rates of microsatellite instability-high tumors in patients of Black/AA and AFR ancestry. Among those with newly identified gPVs (n = 114), 102 (89%) were seen for genetic counseling, with lowest rates among Black/AA (75%) and AFR patients (67%).

CONCLUSIONS

In those with EC, gPV and genetic counseling varied by ancestry, with lowest rates among Black/AA and AFR patients, potentially contributing to disparities in outcomes given implications for treatment and cancer prevention.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Black women with endometrial cancer do worse than White women, and there are many reasons for this disparity. Certain genetic changes from birth (mutations) can increase the risk of cancer, and it is unknown if rates of these changes are different between different ancestry groups. Genetic mutations in 1625 diverse women with endometrial cancer were studied and the lowest rates of mutations and genetic counseling were found in Black and African ancestry women. This could affect their treatment options as well as their families and may make disparities worse.

Improving genetic testing following abnormal mismatch repair immunohistochemistry results in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

Although universal mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in endometrial cancer began at our institution in July 2015, not all eligible patients were referred for genetic testing (GT). In April 2017, genetic counselors obtained IHC data and contacted physicians to approve genetic counseling referrals (GCRs) for Lynch Syndrome (LS) in eligible patients. We assessed if this protocol increased frequency of GCRs and GT in patients with abnormal MMR IHC.

METHODS

We retrospectively (7/2015-5/2022) identified patients with abnormal MMR IHC at a large urban hospital. GCRs and GT were compared between cases from 7/2015-4/2017 (pre-protocol) and 5/2017-5/2022 (post-protocol) with chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Of 794 patients with IHC testing, 177 (22.3%) had abnormal MMR results with 46 (26.0%) meeting criteria for LS screening with GT. Of 46 patients, 16 (34.8%) were identified prior to and 30 (65.2%) after the protocol initiation. GCRs significantly increased from 11/16 (68.8%) to 29/30 (96.7%) in the pre-protocol versus post-protocol groups, p = 0.02. There was no statistically significant difference in GT between groups (10/16, 62.5% vs 26/30, 86.7%, p = 0.07). Of 36 patients who underwent GT, 16 (44.4%) had LS: MSH6, 9; MSH2, 4; PMS2, 2; MLH1, 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased frequency of GCRs was observed following the change in protocol, which is important as LS screening has clinical implications for patients and their families. Despite this additional effort, approximately 15% who met criteria did not undergo GT; further efforts such as universal germline testing in patients with endometrial cancer should be considered.

Germline multigene panel testing of patients with endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries. The present study aimed to determine the frequency of germline pathogenic variants (PV) in patients with EC. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, germline genetic testing (GGT) was performed in 527 patients with EC using a next generation sequencing panel targeting 226 genes, including 5 Lynch syndrome (LS) and 14 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) predisposition genes, and 207 candidate predisposition genes. Gene-level risks were calculated using 1,662 population-matched controls (PMCs). Patients were sub-categorized to fulfill GGT criteria for LS, HBOC, both or none. A total of 60 patients (11.4%) carried PV in LS (5.1%) and HBOC (6.6%) predisposition genes, including two carriers of double PV. PV in LS genes conferred a significantly higher EC risk [odds ratio (OR), 22.4; 95% CI, 7.8-64.3; P=1.8×10^-17] than the most frequently altered HBOC genes BRCA1 (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.6-9.5; P=0.001), BRCA2 (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 1.9-28.9; P=0.002) and CHEK2 (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.0-9.9; P=0.04). Furthermore, >6% of patients with EC not fulfilling LS or HBOC GGT indication criteria carried a PV in a clinically relevant gene. Carriers of PV in LS genes had a significantly lower age of EC onset than non-carriers (P=0.01). Another 11.0% of patients carried PV in a candidate gene (the most frequent were FANCA and MUTYH); however, their individual frequencies did not differ from PMCs (except for aggregated frequency of loss-of-function variants in POLE/POLD1; OR, 10.44; 95% CI, 1.1-100.5; P=0.012). The present study demonstrated the importance of GGT in patients with EC. The increased risk of EC of PV carriers in HBOC genes suggests that the diagnosis of EC should be included in the HBOC GGT criteria.

Comprehensive analysis of germline drivers in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in unselected patients with endometrial cancer (EC), define biallelic gPVs within tumors, and describe their associations with clinicopathologic features.

METHODS

Germline assessment of at least 76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing clinical tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) sequencing from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021. In patients with gPVs, biallelic alterations in ECs were identified through analysis of loss of heterozygosity and somatic PVs. Clinicopathologic variables were compared using nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

Of 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs, and 15 patients had 2 gPVs. There were 231 gPVs in 35 genes (75 [32%] high penetrance; 39 [17%] moderate penetrance; and 117 [51%] low, recessive, or uncertain penetrance). Compared with those without gPVs, patients with gPVs were younger (P = .002), more often White (P = .009), and less obese (P = .025) and had differences in distribution of tumor histology (P = .017) and molecular subtype (P < .001). Among 231 gPVs, 74 (32%) exhibited biallelic inactivation within tumors. For high-penetrance gPVs, 63% (47 of 75) of ECs had biallelic alterations, primarily affecting mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination related genes, including BRCA1,BRCA2, RAD51D, and PALB2. Biallelic inactivation varied across molecular subtypes with highest rates in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or copy-number (CN)-high subtypes (3 of 12 [25%] POLE, 30 of 77 [39%] MSI-H, 27 of 60 [45%] CN-high, 9 of 57 [16%] CN-low; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Of unselected patients with EC, 13% had gPVs, with 63% of gPVs in high-penetrance genes (MMR and homologous recombination) exhibiting biallelic inactivation, potentially driving cancer development. This supports germline assessment in EC given implications for treatment and cancer prevention.

Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Genetic testing has proven utility in identifying and diagnosing individuals with FH. Here we outline the current landscape of genetic testing for FH, recommendations for testing practices and the efforts underway to improve access, availability, and uptake.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alternatives to the traditional genetic testing and counseling paradigm for FH are being explored including expanding screening programs, testing in primary care and/or cardiology clinics, leveraging electronic communication tools like chatbots, and implementing direct contact approaches to facilitate genetic testing of both probands and at-risk relatives. There is no consensus on if, when, and how genetic testing or accompanying genetic counseling should be provided for FH, though traditional genetic counseling and/or testing in specialty lipid clinics is often recommended in expert statements and professional guidelines. More evidence is needed to determine whether alternative approaches to the implementation of genetic testing for FH may be more effective.

Mismatch Repair Protein Status of Non-Neoplastic Uterine and Intestinal Mucosa in Patients with Lynch Syndrome and Double Somatic Mismatch Repair Protein Mutations

Mismatch repair protein-deficient non-neoplastic colonic crypts and endometrial glands (dMMR crypts and glands) have been reported as a unique marker of underlying Lynch syndrome (LS). However, no large studies have directly compared the frequency of detection in cases with double somatic (DS) MMR mutations. We retrospectively analyzed 42 colonic resection specimens (24 LS, 18 DS) and 20 endometrial specimens (9 LS, 11 DS) including 19 hysterectomies and 1 biopsy for dMMR crypts and glands. All specimens were from patients with known primary cancers including colonic adenocarcinomas and endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (including two mixed carcinomas). Four blocks of normal mucosa away from tumor were selected from most cases, as available. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) specific to the primary tumor mutations were analyzed. dMMR crypts were found in 65% of LS and 0% of DS MMR mutated colonic adenocarcinomas (p < 0.001). Most dMMR crypts were detected in the colon (12 of 15) compared to ileum (3). dMMR crypts showed single and grouped loss of MMR IHC expression. dMMR glands were found in 67% of LS and 9% (1 of 11) of DS endometrial cases (p = 0.017). Most dMMR glands were found in the uterine wall, with 1 LS and 1 DS case exhibiting dMMR glands in the lower uterine segment. The majority of cases exhibited multifocal and grouped dMMR glands. No morphologic atypia was identified in dMMR crypts or glands. Overall, we demonstrate that dMMR crypts and glands are highly associated with underlying LS, while rarer in those with DS MMR mutations.

Frequency of actionable germline pathogenic variants identified through tumor next-generation sequencing in a gynecologic cancer cohort

BACKGROUND

Tumor next-generation sequencing can identify potential germline pathogenic variants associated with cancer susceptibility.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of tumor sequencing results that met European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommendations for further germline genetic testing, and the frequency of germline variants among a cohort with gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent tumor sequencing between September 2019 and February 2022 in a large healthcare system in New York City were retrospectively identified. Eligible patients with suspected germline pathogenic variants on tumor sequencing were identified based on ESMO guidelines. Logistic regression was used to explore variables associated with referral and completion of germline testing.

RESULTS

Of 358 patients with gynecologic cancers who underwent tumor sequencing, 81 (22.6%) had ≥1 suspected germline variant according to ESMO guidelines. Of the 81 patients with qualifying tumor sequencing results, 56 (69.1%) received germline testing: 41/46 (89.1%) eligible patients with ovarian cancer and 15/33 (45.5%) with endometrial cancer. In the endometrial cancer cohort, 11/33 (33.3%) eligible patients were not referred for germline testing and the majority of these patients had tumor variants in genes commonly known to cause hereditary cancer. Of the 56 patients who underwent germline testing, 40 (71.4%) had pathogenic germline variants. In multivariable analysis, race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white was associated with lower odds of germline testing referral and completion (OR=0.1, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.5 and OR=0.2, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.6, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Given the high rate of pathogenic germline variant detection and the importance of identifying such variants for both patients and their family, it is imperative that eligible patients undergo germline testing. Additional education for providers on multidisciplinary guidelines and development of clinical pathways to ensure germline testing of suspected pathogenic variants identified on tumor sequencing is warranted, especially in light of the racial/ethnic inequity observed.

Lynch Syndrome Genetics and Clinical Implications

Lynch syndrome (LS) is one of the most prevalent hereditary cancer syndromes in humans and accounts for some 3% of unselected patients with colorectal or endometrial cancer and 10%-15% of those with DNA mismatch repair-deficient tumors. Previous studies have established the genetic basis of LS predisposition, but there have been significant advances recently in the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of LS tumors, which has important implications in clinical management. At the same time, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced cancers with DNA mismatch repair defects. We aim to review the recent progress in the LS field and discuss how the accumulating epidemiologic, clinical, and molecular information has contributed to a more accurate and complete picture of LS, resulting in genotype- and immunologic subtype-specific strategies for surveillance, cancer prevention, and treatment.

Inherited Cancer Susceptibility Gene Sequence Variations Among Patients With Appendix Cancer

Importance

Germline sequence variations in APC, BMPR1A, CDH1, CHEK2, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, PMS2, PTEN, SMAD4, STK11, and TP53 genes are associated with susceptibility to gastrointestinal cancers. As a rare cancer, the evaluation of appendiceal cancer (AC) predisposition has been limited.

Objective

To assess the prevalence and spectrum of inherited cancer susceptibility gene sequence variations in patients with AC and the utility of germline genetic testing for this population.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included patients with AC who underwent germline genetic testing of 14 cancer susceptibility genes performed by a clinical testing laboratory between March 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from March to August 2022. Clinical, individual, and family histories were obtained from clinician-completed test requisition forms. Multigene panel testing was performed by targeted custom capture and sequencing and chromosome rearrangement analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcomes were germline sequence variation prevalence and spectrum in patients with AC.

Results

Among the 131 patients with AC in the cohort (90 female [68.7%]), a total of 16 deleterious sequence variations were identified in 15 patients (11.5%). Similarly, when limited to the 74 patients with AC as the first and only primary tumor, a total of 8 patients (10.8%) had at least 1 deleterious sequence variation in a cancer susceptibility gene. Overall, 6 patients (4.6%) had a deleterious sequence variation observed in MUTYH (5 with monoallelic MUTYH and 1 with biallelic MUTYH). All 4 patients with Lynch syndrome (3.1%) had a sequence variation in the MLH1 gene, of whom 3 were aged 50 years or older at AC diagnosis. Five patients (3.8%) had deleterious sequence variations in other cancer predisposition genes (1 with APC [c.3920T>A, p.I1307K], 2 with CHEK2 [c.470T>C, p.I157T], 1 with SMAD4 [c.263 287dup, p.L98IFS*14], and 1 with TP53 [c.524G>A, p.R175H]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, 1 in every 10 patients with AC who underwent testing for hereditary cancer predisposition carried an inherited gene sequence variation associated with cancer susceptibility. Given the high frequency and broad spectrum of germline gene sequence variations, these data suggest that genetic evaluation might be warranted for all patients diagnosed with this rare malignant tumor. A systemic sequencing effort for all patients with AC may also identify cancer vulnerabilities to exploit for therapeutic development in a cancer type for which clinical trials are limited.

A Previously Unrecognized Molecular Landscape of Lynch Syndrome in the Mexican Population

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the main hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome. There have been few reports regarding the clinical and molecular characteristics of LS patients in Latin America; this is particularly true in the Mexican population, where no information is available. The present study aims to describe the clinical and molecular spectrum of variants in a cohort of patients diagnosed with LS in Mexico. We present a retrospective analysis of 412 patients with suspected LS, whose main site of cancer diagnosis was the colon (58.25%), followed by the endometrium (18.93%). Next-generation sequencing analysis, with an extensive multigene panel, showed that 27.1% (112/414) had a variant in one of the genes of the mismatch repair pathway (MMR); 30.4% (126/414) had a variant in non-MMR genes such as CHEK2, APC, MUTYH, BRCA1, and BRCA2; and 42.5% (176/414) had no genetic variants. Most of the variants were found in MLH1. Pathogenic variants (PVs) in MMR genes were identified in 65.7% (96/146) of the total PVs, and 34.24% (45/146) were in non-MMR genes. Molecular and clinical characterization of patients with LS in specific populations allowed personalized follow-up, with the option for targeted treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the development of public health policies. Moreover, such characterization allows for family cascade testing and consequent prevention strategies.

Unexpected actionable genetic variants revealed by multigene panel testing of patients with uterine cancer

OBJECTIVE

Hereditary uterine cancer (UC) is traditionally associated with pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in Lynch syndrome genes or PTEN; however, growing evidence supports a role for other genes that may reveal new clinical management options. In this study we assessed the prevalence and potential clinical impact of PGVs identified in UC patients referred for comprehensive germline genetic testing that combined testing for Lynch syndrome, PTEN, and other cancer predisposition genes.

METHODS

Prevalence of PGVs in patients referred to a single clinical lab for germline genetic testing with an indication of uterine or endometrial cancer were retrospectively assessed and compared by syndrome type, patient age at testing, and self-reported ancestry. Potential clinical actionability of PGVs was based on established guidelines for clinical management, targeted therapies, and clinical trial eligibility.

RESULTS

PGVs were detected in 13.6% of the cohort (880/6490). PGVs were most frequently observed in Lynch syndrome genes (60.4%) and PTEN (1.5%), with 38.1% in another cancer predisposition gene (i.e., CHEK2, BRCA1/BRCA2). PGV prevalence was similar for patients <50 years and those ≥50 years (15.1% vs 13.2%). Nearly all PGVs (97.2%) were associated with guideline-recommended management, including cascade testing; 60.5% were associated with FDA-approved therapies; and 35.2% were associated with clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Focusing germline testing on Lynch syndrome genes and PTEN and limiting testing to patients <50 years of age at diagnosis may overlook a substantial proportion of UC patients who harbor actionable PGVs. Universal comprehensive genetic testing of UC patients could benefit many patients and at-risk family members.

Implementing universal upfront multi-gene panel testing in endometrial cancer: From cost to practical considerations

OBJECTIVES

The routine use of upfront universal germline genetic testing among patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer (EC) has been proposed to improve diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS) and discover pathogenic variants (PVs) in other cancer susceptibility genes. We propose an algorithm prioritizing upfront multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) for newly diagnosed EC patients.

METHODS

A decision analysis compared the cost of the current algorithm of universal mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) for all EC cases to a new MGPT algorithm that employs upfront MGPT for all EC cases and reserves MMR IHC for the recurrent setting. The increase in the number of LS diagnoses using upfront MGPT, and the number of patients with PVs in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are also estimated.

RESULTS

The MGPT algorithm demonstrated a cost savings of $259 per patient. Assuming 66,950 new cases of EC per year, this would represent $17.1 M of cost savings per year. When applied to all new diagnoses of EC in one year, the MGPT algorithm identified 660 (1%) additional cases of LS that would have been missed with the current algorithm. An additional 660 (1%) EC patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs would be diagnosed only through implementation of universal MGPT.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of universal upfront MGPT is a practical consideration for patients with newly diagnosed EC for cost savings and improved diagnosis of highly penetrant cancer syndromes. Incorporation of germline genetic testing in the upfront setting represents an opportunity to improve access to genetic counseling and testing, and ultimately an avenue to achieve equity and improve the lives of our patients with EC and their families.

Identification of Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Endometrial Cancer Based on a Germline Next Generation Sequencing Multigene Panel Test

We aimed to investigate the prevalence and relative contributions of LS and non-LS mutations in patients with endometrial cancer in Korea. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 204 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer who underwent a germline next generation sequencing multigene panel test covering MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM at three tertiary centers. Thirty patients (14.7%) with pathogenic mutations (12 MLH1; 6 MSH2; 10 MSH6; 2 PMS2) and 20 patients (9.8%) with 22 unclassified variants (8 MLH1; 8 MSH2; 2 MSH6; 3 PMS2; 1 EPCAM) were identified. After excluding four close relatives of a proband, the prevalence of LS was 13.0% (26/200). Patients with LS were more likely than those with sporadic cancer to be younger at diagnosis (48 vs. 53 years, p = 0.045) and meet the Amsterdam II criteria (66.7 vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001). Non-endometrioid histology was more prevalent in patients with MSH6 or PMS2 mutations (41.7%) than those with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations (5.6%, p = 0.026). In this pre-selected cohort of endometrial cancer patients who underwent next generation sequencing, the prevalence of LS was 13%, thus supporting the use of gene panel testing for endometrial cancer patients.

Point/Counterpoint: Is It Time for Universal Germline Genetic Testing for all GI Cancers?

Use of germline genetic testing among patients with cancer is increasing because of (1) the availability of multigene panel tests that include multiple cancer susceptibility genes in a single test, (2) decreased costs of these tests and improvements in insurance coverage, and (3) US Food and Drug Administration-approval of genotype-directed therapies such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for individuals with certain cancers and pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (with possible benefits with other genes in the homologous repair deficiency pathway). In addition, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines have already endorsed germline genetic testing for all patients with certain cancer types (epithelial ovarian cancer, exocrine pancreatic cancer, and high-grade/metastatic prostate cancer), regardless of age or personal/family history of cancer. Herein, we debate the pros and cons of offering germline multigene panel testing to all patients diagnosed with any GI cancer. The authors agree that it may just be a matter of time before germline multigene panel testing is offered to all patients with cancer; however, this article will highlight some of the benefits, risks, and limitations of this approach so that research can help fill some of the gaps to ensure that genetic medicine continues to be implemented in ways that improve real-world patient care and outcomes.

Utility of germline multi-gene panel testing in patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with germline mutations in mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) associated with Lynch syndrome (LS) have an increased lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC). Multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) is a recent hereditary cancer risk tool enabling next-generation sequencing of numerous genes in parallel. We determined the prevalence of actionable cancer predisposition gene mutations identified through MGPT in an EC patient cohort.

METHODS

A single center retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with EC who had a clinical indication for genetic testing and who underwent MGPT as part of standard of care treatment between 2012 and 2021. Pathogenic mutations were identified and actionable mutations were defined as those with clinical management implications. Additionally, the number of individuals identified with LS was compared between MGPT and tumor-based screening.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 224 patients. Thirty-three patients [14.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.4-20.1] had actionable mutations. Twenty-one patients (9.4%, 95% CI = 5.9-14.0) had mutations in LS genes (4 MLH1, 5 MSH2, 7 MSH6, 4 PMS2, 1 Epcam-MSH2). MGPT revealed two patients with LS (9.5% of LS cases) not identified through routine tumor-based screening. Thirteen patients (5.8%, 95% CI = 3.1-9.7) had at least one actionable mutation in a non-Lynch syndrome gene (6 CHEK2, 2 BRCA2, 2 ATM, 2 APC, 1 RAD51C, 1 BRCA1).

CONCLUSIONS

Germline MGPT is both feasible and informative as it identifies LS cases not found on tumor testing as well as additional actionable mutations in patients with EC.