1
|
Borczuk AC. Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer: Recommendations and Update. Surg Pathol Clin 2024; 17:307-320. [PMID: 38692813 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2023.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Adoption of molecular testing in lung cancer is increasing. Molecular testing for staging and prediction of response for targeted therapy remain the main indications, and although utilization of blood-based testing for tumor is growing, the use of the diagnostic cytology and tissue specimens is equally important. The pathologist needs to optimize reflex testing, incorporate stage-based algorithms, and understand types of tests for timely and complete assessment in the majority of cases. When tissue is limited, testing should capture the most frequent alterations to maximize the yield of what are largely mutually exclusive alterations, avoiding the need for repeat biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alain C Borczuk
- Anatomic Pathology, Northwell Health, 2200 Northern Boulevard Suite 104, Greenvale, NY 11548, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu S, Graves N, Tan AC. The cost-effectiveness of including liquid biopsy into molecular profiling strategies for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in an Asian population. Lung Cancer 2024; 191:107794. [PMID: 38636314 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Liquid biopsy is complementary to tissue biopsy for lung cancer profiling, yet evidence of the cost-effectiveness is limited. This could retard implementation and reimbursement in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of profiling strategies that include liquid biopsy and to identify the optimal profiling approach for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an Asian population using Singapore as an example. MATERIALS AND METHODS A decision tree and partitioned-survival model was developed from the Singapore healthcare system's perspective to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five molecular profiling strategies: either tissue or plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) alone, a concurrent, and two sequential approaches. Model inputs were informed by local data or published literature. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were undertaken to understand the robustness of the conclusions for decision making. The optimal strategy at different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds was presented by cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier and the expected loss curve. RESULTS The sequential tissue-plasma NGS approach revealed an additional 0.0981 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for an extra cost of S$3,074 over a 20-year time horizon compared to tissue NGS alone, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of S$31,318/QALY and an incremental net monetary benefit of S$1,343 per patient. The findings were sensitive to the costs of pembrolizumab and osimertinib and the probabilities of re-biopsy after tissue NGS. Sequential plasma-tissue NGS and plasma NGS alone were more costly and less effective than alternatives. CONCLUSION The sequential tissue-plasma NGS approach generated the highest net monetary benefit and was the optimal testing strategy when WTP was S$45,000/QALY. It retained superiority but understandably with a higher ICER when expensive, non-first line treatments were included. Overall, its routine clinical practice should be proactively considered for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC in an Asian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibo Liu
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Graves
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Aaron C Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mestre-Ferrándiz J, Franch Camino B, Hidalgo Á, Del Llano Núñez-Cortés A, Del Llano Señarís JE, Lumbreras B, Beas Pedraza D, Nuño-Solinís R, Paz-Ares L, Ramón Y Cajal S, Rodríguez MJ. Expert-based collaborative analysis of the situation and prospects of biomarker test implementation in oncology in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:985-990. [PMID: 38206517 PMCID: PMC10981580 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03338-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Biomarkers as screening for precision medicine is a fundamental step. The purpose of this article is twofold. First, to highlight the existing barriers in the implementation of Precision Medicine in Spain, with a special emphasis on barriers in access to the determination of biomarkers. Second, to provide a Roadmap that can help implement Precision Medicine equitably at the national level and optimize the use of biomarkers. METHODS A systematic review of literature (SRL) and a focus group (FG) with multidisciplinary experts has been carried out in 2023. Participants were contacted individually, and discourse analysis was processed anonymously. RESULTS We carried out a quantitative (SRL) and a qualitative approach (FG). The discourse analysis and roadmap were sent individually to each expert for approval. CONCLUSIONS The potential of Precision Medicine has not been fulfilled in Spain. While several regional initiatives are in place, a national plan or strategy around Precision Medicine and use of biomarkers is lacking. In a general context of rapid progress at a global and European level, including the 2021 Europe's Beating Cancer Plan, it is time to define and implement a National Plan to make the promise come true. While some comparable countries within Europe - such as the UK or France - are mature enough to adopt such strategies, in Spain there is still a long way to go. We consider that the different strands of work outlined in the Roadmap can be used as basis for such purpose.
Collapse
|
4
|
Fielding D, Lakis V, Dalley AJ, Chittoory H, Newell F, Koufariotis LT, Patch AM, Kazakoff S, Bashirzadeh F, Son JH, Ryan K, Steinfort D, Williamson JP, Bint M, Pahoff C, Nguyen PT, Twaddell S, Arnold D, Grainge C, Pattison A, Fairbairn D, Gune S, Christie J, Holmes O, Leonard C, Wood S, Pearson JV, Lakhani SR, Waddell N, Simpson PT, Nones K. Evaluation of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Samples from Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for Whole Genome, Whole Exome and Comprehensive Panel Sequencing. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:785. [PMID: 38398180 PMCID: PMC10887389 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is often the only source of tumor tissue from patients with advanced, inoperable lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA aspirates are used for the diagnosis, staging, and genomic testing to inform therapy options. Here we extracted DNA and RNA from 220 EBUS-TBNA aspirates to evaluate their suitability for whole genome (WGS), whole exome (WES), and comprehensive panel sequencing. For a subset of 40 cases, the same nucleic acid extraction was sequenced using WGS, WES, and the TruSight Oncology 500 assay. Genomic features were compared between sequencing platforms and compared with those reported by clinical testing. A total of 204 aspirates (92.7%) had sufficient DNA (100 ng) for comprehensive panel sequencing, and 109 aspirates (49.5%) had sufficient material for WGS. Comprehensive sequencing platforms detected all seven clinically reported tier 1 actionable mutations, an additional three (7%) tier 1 mutations, six (15%) tier 2-3 mutations, and biomarkers of potential immunotherapy benefit (tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability). As expected, WGS was more suited for the detection and discovery of emerging novel biomarkers of treatment response. WGS could be performed in half of all EBUS-TBNA aspirates, which points to the enormous potential of EBUS-TBNA as source material for large, well-curated discovery-based studies for novel and more effective predictors of treatment response. Comprehensive panel sequencing is possible in the vast majority of fresh EBUS-TBNA aspirates and enhances the detection of actionable mutations over current clinical testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Fielding
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; (A.J.D.); (H.C.); (S.R.L.); (P.T.S.)
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (F.B.); (J.H.S.); (K.R.)
| | - Vanessa Lakis
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - Andrew J. Dalley
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; (A.J.D.); (H.C.); (S.R.L.); (P.T.S.)
| | - Haarika Chittoory
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; (A.J.D.); (H.C.); (S.R.L.); (P.T.S.)
| | - Felicity Newell
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - Lambros T. Koufariotis
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - Ann-Marie Patch
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - Stephen Kazakoff
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - Farzad Bashirzadeh
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (F.B.); (J.H.S.); (K.R.)
| | - Jung Hwa Son
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (F.B.); (J.H.S.); (K.R.)
| | - Kimberley Ryan
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (F.B.); (J.H.S.); (K.R.)
| | - Daniel Steinfort
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia; (D.S.); (J.C.)
| | - Jonathan P. Williamson
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Liverpool Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia;
| | - Michael Bint
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, QLD 4575, Australia; (M.B.); (A.P.)
| | - Carl Pahoff
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia;
| | - Phan Tien Nguyen
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
| | - Scott Twaddell
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.T.); (D.A.); (C.G.)
| | - David Arnold
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.T.); (D.A.); (C.G.)
| | - Christopher Grainge
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.T.); (D.A.); (C.G.)
| | - Andrew Pattison
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, QLD 4575, Australia; (M.B.); (A.P.)
| | - David Fairbairn
- Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
| | - Shailendra Gune
- NSW Health Pathology South, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia;
| | - Jemma Christie
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia; (D.S.); (J.C.)
| | - Oliver Holmes
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - Conrad Leonard
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - Scott Wood
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - John V. Pearson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - Sunil R. Lakhani
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; (A.J.D.); (H.C.); (S.R.L.); (P.T.S.)
- Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
| | - Nicola Waddell
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
| | - Peter T. Simpson
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; (A.J.D.); (H.C.); (S.R.L.); (P.T.S.)
| | - Katia Nones
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.L.); (F.N.); (L.T.K.); (A.-M.P.); (S.K.); (O.H.); (C.L.); (S.W.); (J.V.P.); (N.W.); (K.N.)
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hofman P, Berezowska S, Kazdal D, Mograbi B, Ilié M, Stenzinger A, Hofman V. Current challenges and practical aspects of molecular pathology for non-small cell lung cancers. Virchows Arch 2024; 484:233-246. [PMID: 37801103 PMCID: PMC10948551 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03651-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
The continuing evolution of treatment options in thoracic oncology requires the pathologist to regularly update diagnostic algorithms for management of tumor samples. It is essential to decide on the best way to use tissue biopsies, cytological samples, as well as liquid biopsies to identify the different mandatory predictive biomarkers of lung cancers in a short turnaround time. However, biological resources and laboratory member workforce are limited and may be not sufficient for the increased complexity of molecular pathological analyses and for complementary translational research development. In this context, the surgical pathologist is the only one who makes the decisions whether or not to send specimens to immunohistochemical and molecular pathology platforms. Moreover, the pathologist can rapidly contact the oncologist to obtain a new tissue biopsy and/or a liquid biopsy if he/she considers that the biological material is not sufficient in quantity or quality for assessment of predictive biomarkers. Inadequate control of algorithms and sampling workflow may lead to false negative, inconclusive, and incomplete findings, resulting in inappropriate choice of therapeutic strategy and potentially poor outcome for patients. International guidelines for lung cancer treatment are based on the results of the expression of different proteins and on genomic alterations. These guidelines have been established taking into consideration the best practices to be set up in clinical and molecular pathology laboratories. This review addresses the current predictive biomarkers and algorithms for use in thoracic oncology molecular pathology as well as the central role of the pathologist, notably in the molecular tumor board and her/his participation in the treatment decision-making. The perspectives in this setting will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Hofman
- Côte d'Azur University, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, BP69, 06001, Nice cedex 01, France.
- Côte d'Azur University, IRCAN, Inserm, CNRS 7284, U1081, Nice, France.
| | - Sabina Berezowska
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Kazdal
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Baharia Mograbi
- Côte d'Azur University, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, BP69, 06001, Nice cedex 01, France
- Côte d'Azur University, IRCAN, Inserm, CNRS 7284, U1081, Nice, France
| | - Marius Ilié
- Côte d'Azur University, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, BP69, 06001, Nice cedex 01, France
- Côte d'Azur University, IRCAN, Inserm, CNRS 7284, U1081, Nice, France
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Véronique Hofman
- Côte d'Azur University, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, BP69, 06001, Nice cedex 01, France
- Côte d'Azur University, IRCAN, Inserm, CNRS 7284, U1081, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zazo S, Pérez‐Buira S, Carvajal N, Plaza‐Sánchez J, Manso R, Pérez‐González N, Dominguez C, Prieto‐Potin I, Rubio J, Dómine M, Lozano V, Mohedano P, Carcedo D, Carias R, Rojo F. Actionable mutational profiling in solid tumors using hybrid-capture-based next-generation sequencing in a real-world setting in Spain. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6827. [PMID: 38213074 PMCID: PMC10905216 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe the performance of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel for the detection of precise genomic alterations in cancer in Spanish clinical practice. The impact of tumor characteristics was evaluated on informative NGS and actionable mutation rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital (May 2021-March 2022) where molecular diagnostic of 537 Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tissue samples of diverse solid tumors (lung, colorectal, melanoma, gastrointestinal stromal, among others) was performed using AVENIO Tumor Tissue Targeted Kit. A descriptive analysis of the features of all samples was carried out. Multivariable logistic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of sample characteristics on NGS performance defined by informative results rate (for all tumors and for lung tumors), and on actionable mutations rate (for lung tumors only). RESULTS AVENIO performance rate was 75.2% in all tumor samples and 75.3% in lung cancer samples, and the multivariable analysis showed that surgical specimens are most likely to provide informative results than diagnostic biopsies. Regarding the mutational findings, 727 pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or variant of unknown significance mutations were found in all tumor samples. Single nucleotide variant was the most common genomic alteration, both for all tumor samples (85.3% and 81.9% for all solid tumors and lung samples, respectively). In lung tumors, multivariable analysis showed that it is more likely to find actionable mutations from non-smokers and patients with adenocarcinoma, large cell, or undifferentiated histologies. CONCLUSION This is the largest cohort-level study in Spain to profile the analyses of biopsy samples of different tumors using NGS in routine clinical practice. Our findings showed that the use of NGS routinely provides good rates of informative results and can improve tumor characterization and identify a greater number of actionable mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Zazo
- Department of PathologyFundación Jiménez Díaz University HospitalMadridSpain
- IIS‐Fundación Jimenez DiazCenter for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC)MadridSpain
| | - Sandra Pérez‐Buira
- Department of PathologyFundación Jiménez Díaz University HospitalMadridSpain
| | - Nerea Carvajal
- Department of PathologyFundación Jiménez Díaz University HospitalMadridSpain
| | | | - Rebeca Manso
- Department of PathologyFundación Jiménez Díaz University HospitalMadridSpain
| | | | - Carolina Dominguez
- IIS‐Fundación Jimenez DiazCenter for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC)MadridSpain
| | - Iván Prieto‐Potin
- Department of PathologyFundación Jiménez Díaz University HospitalMadridSpain
| | - Jaime Rubio
- Medical Oncology DepartmentFundación Jiménez Díaz University HospitalMadridSpain
| | - Manuel Dómine
- IIS‐Fundación Jimenez DiazCenter for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC)MadridSpain
- Medical Oncology DepartmentFundación Jiménez Díaz University HospitalMadridSpain
| | | | | | | | - Rafael Carias
- Department of PathologyFundación Jiménez Díaz University HospitalMadridSpain
| | - Federico Rojo
- Department of PathologyFundación Jiménez Díaz University HospitalMadridSpain
- IIS‐Fundación Jimenez DiazCenter for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC)MadridSpain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Formanti Alonso L, Atienza Cuevas L, Romero García R, Mohigefer Barrera J, Del Río Ignacio JJ, Santisteban Espejo A, Bernal Florindo I, Catalina Fernández I, García Rojo M. [Study of genetic variants in 169 non-small cell lung cancer patients]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE PATOLOGIA : PUBLICACION OFICIAL DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE ANATOMIA PATOLOGICA Y DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE CITOLOGIA 2023; 56:233-242. [PMID: 37879820 DOI: 10.1016/j.patol.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in our country. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the paradigm of personalized medicine. The main objective of this study is analysing the distribution of the most frequently described clinically significant variants in NSCLC, in our environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS We studied the immunohistochemical expression of TTF1, p40 and PD-L1 and the genetic variants frequency using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) with a panel of 52 genes, in 174 NSCLC paraffin-embedded samples in 169 patients (111 men and 52 women) from the province of Cádiz. RESULTS The immunohistochemical expression of TTF1, p40 and PD-L1 was positive in 87%, 0% and 46% in adenocarcinoma, and 0%, 100% and 41% in squamous cell carcinoma. In NGS, the most common single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were KRAS (36%), EGFR (14%), BRAF (10%), PIK3CA (8%), and MET (3%). The most frequent copy number variants (CNVs) were amplifications in NF1 (30%), EGFR (18%), CCND1 (9%), MYC (9%) and KRAS (7%). In women, SNV in EGFR are more frequent than in men (P<.0001). Adenocarcinoma is the most frequent histological type with SNV in KRAS (P=.007361) or in EGFR (P<.0001). Gene fusions were detected in 16 patients (9.47%), in 9 cases in the MET gene. CONCLUSIONS We detected associations, not described so far, between immunohistochemical expression and specific gene variants, which could have an impact on the treatment of NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Formanti Alonso
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, España; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España.
| | - Lidia Atienza Cuevas
- Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España; Unidad de Gestión Clínica Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España
| | - Raquel Romero García
- Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España; Unidad de Gestión Clínica Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España
| | - Javier Mohigefer Barrera
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, España; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España
| | - Juan Jesús Del Río Ignacio
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, España; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España
| | - Antonio Santisteban Espejo
- Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España; Unidad de Gestión Clínica Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España
| | - Irene Bernal Florindo
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, España; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España
| | - Inmaculada Catalina Fernández
- Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España; Unidad de Gestión Clínica Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España
| | - Marcial García Rojo
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, España; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España
| |
Collapse
|