Oral cancer examinations among U.S. Hispanics in 1998

Disparities in Oral Cancer Screening Among Dental Professionals: NHANES 2011-2016

INTRODUCTION

As early detection of oral cancers is associated with better survival, oral cancer screening should be included in dental visits for adults. This study examines the rate and predictors of oral cancer screening exams among U.S. adults with a recent dental visit.

METHODS

Individuals aged ≥30 years who received a dental visit in the last 2 years, in the 2011-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed in December 2018. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models examined the likelihood of intraoral and extraoral oral cancer screening exams, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, poverty income ratio, health insurance, tobacco smoking, and alcohol consumption. Subgroup analyses were conducted among races/ethnicities, smokers, and alcohol consumers. Statistical significance was set at p<0.01.

RESULTS

A total of 37.6% and 31.3% reported receiving an intraoral and extraoral oral cancer screening exam, respectively. Minority racial/ethnic groups versus white, non-Hispanics, less-educated versus more-educated, uninsured and Medicaid-insured versus privately insured, and low-income versus high-income participants were less likely to have received intraoral or extraoral oral cancer screening exams. There was no difference in the likelihood of being screened based on smoking status. Alcohol consumers were more likely to be screened. Among subgroups, less-educated and low-income individuals were less likely to be screened.

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly higher proportion of minority race/ethnicity and low SES individuals report not receiving an oral cancer screening exam, despite a recent dental visit. This selective screening by dental professionals is incompliant with guidelines and concerning because these groups are more likely to present with an advanced stage of oral cancer at diagnosis. An understanding of the reasons for discriminatory oral cancer screening practices could help develop effective interventions.

The impact of low-dose carcinogens and environmental disruptors on tissue invasion and metastasis

The purpose of this review is to stimulate new ideas regarding low-dose environmental mixtures and carcinogens and their potential to promote invasion and metastasis. Whereas a number of chapters in this review are devoted to the role of low-dose environmental mixtures and carcinogens in the promotion of invasion and metastasis in specific tumors such as breast and prostate, the overarching theme is the role of low-dose carcinogens in the progression of cancer stem cells. It is becoming clearer that cancer stem cells in a tumor are the ones that assume invasive properties and colonize distant organs. Therefore, low-dose contaminants that trigger epithelial-mesenchymal transition, for example, in these cells are of particular interest in this review. This we hope will lead to the collaboration between scientists who have dedicated their professional life to the study of carcinogens and those whose interests are exclusively in the arena of tissue invasion and metastasis.

Oral epithelial stem cells - implications in normal development and cancer metastasis

Oral mucosa is continuously exposed to environmental forces and has to be constantly renewed. Accordingly, the oral mucosa epithelium contains a large reservoir of epithelial stem cells necessary for tissue homeostasis. Despite considerable scientific advances in stem cell behavior in a number of tissues, fewer studies have been devoted to the stem cells in the oral epithelium. Most of oral mucosa stem cells studies are focused on identifying cancer stem cells (CSC) in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) among other head and neck cancers. OSCCs are the most prevalent epithelial tumors of the head and neck region, marked by their aggressiveness and invasiveness. Due to their highly tumorigenic properties, it has been suggested that CSC may be the critical population of cancer cells in the development of OSCC metastasis. This review presents a brief overview of epithelium stem cells with implications in oral health, and the clinical implications of the CSC concept in OSCC metastatic dissemination.

Oral and pharyngeal cancer incidence and mortality among Hispanics, 1996-2002: the need for ethnoregional studies in cancer research

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer (OPC) incidence and mortality statistics among Hispanics in New York State differed from those among Hispanics in the United States as a whole.

METHODS

OPC incidence and mortality statistics for 1996-2002 were obtained from the New York State Cancer Registry and compared with national statistics released by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program for the same period.

RESULTS

Among Hispanic men, OPC incidence rates were approximately 75% and 89% higher in New York State and New York City, respectively, than national rates reported by the SEER program. No notable differences were identified among Hispanic women. Incidence rates among New York State Hispanic men were 16% higher than those of their non-Hispanic White counterparts. The difference was twice as high (32%) among Hispanic men in New York City. Mortality rates among both men and women exhibited patterns similar to the incidence patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnoregional differences exist in the incidence and mortality rates of OPC in the United States. New York State Hispanic men exhibit much higher incidence and mortality rates than US Hispanics as reported by the SEER program.

Is there disparity in the care of minority patients with upper aerodigestive tract malignancy?

The data presently available indicate that there is unequal (disparate) care in patients with head and neck cancer. The reasons for this are likely multifactorial and require further study. Complicating such work is the need for subgroup analysis. For example, Hispanics are not a homogeneous ethnic group; hence, differences in social perception, cultural mores, and available medical resources can be demonstrated that can directly impact care and outcome. Appropriate epidemiologic studies are needed with more underserved minority patients to analyze these differences further and to address such differences.

Oral cancer knowledge and practices of dentists along the Texas-Mexico border

BACKGROUND

The study assessed the knowledge and clinical practices of Texas-Mexico border dentists in oral cancer prevention and early detection.

METHODS

A pretested, self-administered questionnaire was mailed to all 398 dentists registered to practice along the Texas-Mexico border.

RESULTS

Inadequacies and ambivalence in respondents' oral cancer knowledge and practices were evident. Performance of oral cancer examinations was associated with positive perception of undergraduate oral cancer training (P =.02). Most respondents (81%) were interested in oral cancer continuing education (CE).

CONCLUSIONS

More emphasis on oral cancer training for dental students as well as provision of oral cancer CE to respondents are recommended.