A cancer genetics education campaign: delivering parallel messages to clinicians and the public

A Follow-Up Community Survey of Knowledge and Beliefs About Cancer and Genetics

The purpose of this study is to assess changes since the launch of the US Surgeon General's campaign in the public's beliefs about the role of genetics in the etiology of cancer, as well as changes in recording family health history. We conducted a survey of 480 Western New York adults, assessing: (1) experiences with cancer, (2) beliefs about cancer and genetics, and (3) practices of recording family health history. Most respondents were aware of the importance of family history. The sample also showed increased knowledge about cancer and genetics compared with a previous survey. However, only 7 % kept written records that included medical conditions, which was not different from a previous survey. Time constraints, apathy, and reluctance to find out negative health information were the most reported barriers. Results suggest a need for continued education of the public, with increased emphasis on written family health records.

How can we reach them? Information seeking and preferences for a cancer family history campaign in underserved communities

Individuals with a family history of cancer are at elevated risk for the disease, and web-based tools are available to assist in assessing risk. Preferences for a potential campaign to promote awareness of the role of family history in cancer risk were sought, guided by McGuire's Input-Output Persuasion Model. A randomized telephone survey administered to five underserved communities assessed potential campaign messages, channels, sources, receivers, and destinations and use of the Internet (n = 101). Information sources sought about hereditary cancer and their predictors were assessed. Nearly half of the sample was African American and had annual income below $25,000. Most (59%) had Internet access at home. Few differences emerged as a function of race (African American vs. Other). The Internet was the most common (43%) first source sought for hereditary cancer information, followed by physicians (23%). In univariate multinomial logistic regression models, those with a high school education or more and those with greater family history (trend) were more likely than those without to choose the Internet as their first source of information over physicians. Our survey provided a wealth of information for understanding how to best launch our family history cancer risk communication campaign. Education level affected information seeking, and efforts are under way to lessen this potential barrier.

Epilepsy patients' perceptions about stigma, education, and awareness: preliminary responses based on a community participatory approach

As individuals directly impacted by their experience of epilepsy and others' responses to it, epilepsy patients' opinions about education and awareness issues are needed. A community-based participatory approach was used to develop a survey of public and patient attitudes and perceptions about epilepsy, which was administered to persons with epilepsy. The majority of the 165 respondents (34% response rate) indicated they perceive misperceptions and stigma related to epilepsy in the general public, which they thought could be ameliorated through educational interventions. Respondents indicated potential avenues of educational intervention for the general public as well as for those with epilepsy, with recommended content and intervention type depending on target audience. The community-based participatory research process and the patients' perceptions gathered through the resulting survey indicate potential activities for overcoming stigma and increasing education and awareness related to epilepsy.

Initial Perspectives from Midwestern Neurologists: Epilepsy Patients' Barriers and Motivators for Seeking Treatment

PURPOSE

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological illness that affects 2.7 million people in the United States, but remains poorly understood. Care providers may not recognize their patients' need for epilepsy information, contributing to treatment barriers, such as stigmatization and poor patient-provider communication.

METHODS

The current study piloted a survey of epilepsy-related attitudes and perceptions of 33 Midwestern neurologists. The survey included questions about perceived barriers to and motivators for treatment, thoughts on misperceptions of epilepsy in the community and in the patient population, and potential interventions to address misperceptions.

RESULTS

Respondents perceived misinformation and lack of knowledge in patients and the general public that could be contributing to the barriers that exist to treat patients adequately. Respondents suggested potential methods for addressing misperceptions effectively.

DISCUSSION

This study of neurologists' perceptions about epilepsy barriers and needs provides an important perspective for the development of interventions to address misperceptions and barriers among patients and the public.

A model for the development of genetics education programs for health professionals

PURPOSE

The need for education programs to facilitate the integration of genetics into health practice is well recognized. The inclusion of education as an aspect of genetics policy and the establishment of national bodies for genetics education extend program development beyond ad hoc programs conducted by individual practitioners. A framework for the development of an effective program is required that has a strong theoretic basis and incorporates rigorous evaluation.

METHODS

Relevant aspects of three theories that can inform genetics education programs are described: program logic modeling, adult learning theory, and evaluation theory. These are drawn on to develop a framework for the development and implementation of genetics education programs for health professionals and concurrent evaluation.

RESULTS

The utility of the framework is demonstrated in the development and implementation of "The Genetics File" program, a multifaceted program for general practitioners, comprising an enduring print resource and interactive workshop. The evaluation strategy developed is also documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Program logic, adult learning theory, and evaluation theory together provide a useful and relevant theoretic framework for the development of genetics education programs for health professionals.

Cancer knowledge and disparities in the information age

Increasing information flow often leads to widening gaps in knowledge between different socioeconomic status (SES) groups as higher SES groups are more likely to acquire this new information at a faster rate than lower SES groups. These gaps in knowledge may offer a partial but robust explanation for differential risk behaviors and health disparities between different social groups. Drawing on the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003), a national survey of communication behaviors conducted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), we examine the relationship between publicity and knowledge gaps on two cancer topics that received different levels of publicity: knowledge about tobacco and sun exposure and their respective links to cancer. Analyses of the HINTS 2003 data suggest that differential knowledge levels of causes of cancer between SES groups are one potential explanation of cancer disparities that have been extensively reported in the literature. It is evident that high income and high education are associated with awareness about causes of major cancers such as lung and skin, and may allow people to protect themselves and minimize their risks. The data also show that heavier media attention could attenuate the knowledge gaps though moderate publicity or lack of news coverage may actually widen them. Last, the findings in this article suggest that it is necessary to take into account the SES variation within different racial and ethnic groups rather than mask them by treating the groups as one.